Bug#627394: marked as done (transition: rpm)
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2011 08:40:34 +0200 with message-id 4de33be2.3070...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#627394: transition: rpm has caused the Debian Bug report #627394, regarding transition: rpm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 627394: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627394 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi I've just uploaded new rpm (I should have probably started with asking here, but I simply forgot, sorry) to unstable. Most likely all things which build depend on librpm-dev will be broken: dose2: librpm-dev fossology: librpm-dev libextractor: librpm-dev rpm2html: librpm-dev I'm going to verify it and file FTBFS bugs on them. The primary reason for uploading to upstable was fixing bug#621452. - -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com - -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.37.6-0.5-desktop (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJN1jshAAoJEGo39bHX+xdNMMcQAJWgqhI5HahlYxj9CPd4f+AK pBG80tUbnzQd/fXEa9UzdWDTSuHX7lC9VVZ2eXO2GlO/GC2xNrqfz64koRXiU8Jb dW3R1CsJHFHrqpW1LIy3jiIoOQG8JNvYKl6b/OBItCyh6NflFEKBxd1X+1djvdBN eG7LC+IrUIseHO11zUkJkvEZ2D1n9T96YTVetupoW29tzDL07a1ZW9uIhsB1xNYE CKkdqtgNjdZcD8dgsfLrIVNETA4gezlRyygjlBw5UbzlRwX+xGsEw8fsvJqc2ph+ 4tEt9oby7jc8UsA4n0ZxUfUAZPs/EapS6QU8aoeWCGFfDeuFnEgEIv+4/UHtMdNG GBOKm2dxCXhMm6o5jcNroG0DKXGfoOwusxIsc4vIeODgJ1o3Tw+5BB0reb7jZ+E9 CUnVQn24gtgF4VkYmt3qc+mlgIXTa/QvBe08YySnD/7y0xGkZteyP3NcTf57zG6/ ZJuIN1oF+R6jqq6qY24wb14AjGEpGYG8MxEFZv2XmzsrKhqBTz9CvwSV6l7wHN9K 5y17c2L6HaG7k42EsubewLoLzDRenoUW8qFblzsVWpLF3Lv6drfLT5zxQVOcTV0l gG2Avr/W3aO0yggtZR4yyPc/JPhOC6cutiKoZ9r1w2UWWwetXtlps2ll05pD9l7W npKfnFsBH/j6nGPAkH6n =AujB -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 05/20/2011 11:57 AM, Michal Čihař wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi I've just uploaded new rpm (I should have probably started with asking here, but I simply forgot, sorry) to unstable. Most likely all things which build depend on librpm-dev will be broken: dose2: librpm-dev fossology: librpm-dev libextractor: librpm-dev rpm2html: librpm-dev I'm going to verify it and file FTBFS bugs on them. The primary reason for uploading to upstable was fixing bug#621452. It has migrated. rpm |4.9.0-5 | testing | source, amd64, armel, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ ---End Message---
[SRM] proposed stable update openldap
Hi, I've prepared a proposed update to squeeze for openldap. The maintainers of that package let me know they would like some help so I've proposed this update to them last week, and received no objections. I have installed this update in our LDAP test environment with no issues found. It contains 3 changes: - A data loss bug which has been fixed in unstable for a while now; - Three low-prio security updates which have been in Ubuntu for some time; - A grave problem when reconfiguring the package. Changelog follows, debdiff is attached. Please let me know if it's OK to upload. openldap (2.4.23-7.1) stable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload targeted at stable. * Picked the following patches from various sources: [ Matthijs Möhlmann ] * Update patch service-operational-before-detach (Closes: #616164, #598361) [ Ubuntu Security Team / Jamie Strandboge ] * SECURITY UPDATE: fix successful anonymous bind via chain overlay when using forwarded authentication failures - debian/patches/CVE-2011-1024 - CVE-2011-1024 * SECURITY UPDATE: verify password when authenticating to rootdn and using ndb backend. Note: Debian is not compiled with --enable-ndb by default - debian/patches/CVE-2011-1025 - CVE-2011-1025 * SECURITY UPDATE: fix DoS when processing unauthenticated modrdn requests and requestDN is empty - debian/patches/CVE-2011-1081 - CVE-2011-1081 - LP: #742104, Closes: 617606 [ Raphaël Hertzog ] * Fix dpkg-reconfigure slapd. Closes: #596343 -- Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org Wed, 25 May 2011 16:40:39 +0200 Cheers, Thijs openldap_stable.debdiff Description: Binary data
Bug#628570: nmu: akonadi-googledata_1.2.0-1
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal Hello, we need to rebuild akonadi-googledata in order to make the kdepim sync with google accounts work again, see: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2011/05/msg00048.html nmu akonadi-googledata_1.2.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against newer libgcal and KDE SC libraries. dw akonadi-googledata_1.2.0-1 . ALL . -m kde4libs5-dev (= 4:4.6), kdepimlibs5-dev (= 4:4.6), libgcal-dev (= 0.9.6-3) -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105301202.48126.panfa...@gmail.com
Bug#628570: nmu: akonadi-googledata_1.2.0-1
Hi, dw akonadi-googledata_1.2.0-1 . ALL . -m kde4libs5-dev (= 4:4.6), kdepimlibs5-dev (= 4:4.6), libgcal-dev (= 0.9.6-3) sorry, it's kdelibs5-dev, not kde4libs5-dev. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105301223.38799.panfa...@gmail.com
Bug#628570: marked as done (nmu: akonadi-googledata_1.2.0-1)
Your message dated Mon, 30 May 2011 12:56:35 +0200 with message-id 4de377e3.1040...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#628570: nmu: akonadi-googledata_1.2.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #628570, regarding nmu: akonadi-googledata_1.2.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 628570: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628570 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal Hello, we need to rebuild akonadi-googledata in order to make the kdepim sync with google accounts work again, see: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2011/05/msg00048.html nmu akonadi-googledata_1.2.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against newer libgcal and KDE SC libraries. dw akonadi-googledata_1.2.0-1 . ALL . -m kde4libs5-dev (= 4:4.6), kdepimlibs5-dev (= 4:4.6), libgcal-dev (= 0.9.6-3) -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 30/05/2011 12:02, José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote: Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal Hello, we need to rebuild akonadi-googledata in order to make the kdepim sync with google accounts work again, see: http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2011/05/msg00048.html nmu akonadi-googledata_1.2.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against newer libgcal and KDE SC libraries. dw akonadi-googledata_1.2.0-1 . ALL . -m kde4libs5-dev (= 4:4.6), kdepimlibs5-dev (= 4:4.6), libgcal-dev (= 0.9.6-3) Scheduled (with dw fixed). Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ ---End Message---
Re: [SRM] proposed stable update openldap
Hi, On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 10:12 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: I've prepared a proposed update to squeeze for openldap. The maintainers of that package let me know they would like some help so I've proposed this update to them last week, and received no objections. I have installed this update in our LDAP test environment with no issues found. Thanks for this. It contains 3 changes: - A data loss bug which has been fixed in unstable for a while now; - Three low-prio security updates which have been in Ubuntu for some time; These look okay; thanks. - A grave problem when reconfiguring the package. This (#596343) seems okay, but doesn't appear to have been fixed in unstable yet, which is generally a pre-requisite for applying the fix to stable. Are there any plans to do that in the near future? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1306754640.3313.3498.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: [SRM] proposed stable update openldap
On Mon, May 30, 2011 13:24, Adam D. Barratt wrote: - A grave problem when reconfiguring the package. This (#596343) seems okay, but doesn't appear to have been fixed in unstable yet, which is generally a pre-requisite for applying the fix to stable. Are there any plans to do that in the near future? No plan yet, but how long does it need to be in sid to satisfy this wish? Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/97abb4e4661b39de5b172836b94d54fa.squir...@wm.kinkhorst.nl
Processed: retitle 625581 to pythonmagick: FTBFS: _Image.cpp:89:123: error: no matches converting function 'channelDepth' to type 'void (class Magick::Image::*)(enum MagickCore::ChannelType, unsigned
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # pythonmagick FTBFS: retitle 625581 pythonmagick: FTBFS: _Image.cpp:89:123: error: no matches converting function 'channelDepth' to type 'void (class Magick::Image::*)(enum MagickCore::ChannelType, unsigned int)' Bug #625581 [src:pythonmagick] transition: libmagick4 Bug #628254 [src:pythonmagick] pythonmagick: FTBFS: _Image.cpp:89:123: error: no matches converting function 'channelDepth' to type 'void (class Magick::Image::*)(enum MagickCore::ChannelType, unsigned int)' Changed Bug title to 'pythonmagick: FTBFS: _Image.cpp:89:123: error: no matches converting function 'channelDepth' to type 'void (class Magick::Image::*)(enum MagickCore::ChannelType, unsigned int)'' from 'transition: libmagick4' Ignoring request to change the title of bug#628254 to the same title block 625544 with 625581 Bug #625544 [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick4 Was blocked by: 625553 625578 625576 625550 625579 625552 625554 625602 625582 625592 625561 625585 625580 625573 625597 625583 625557 625574 625595 625546 625577 625599 625609 625584 625575 625547 625551 625581 625545 625558 625559 625610 625556 625549 625560 625593 625589 625548 Added blocking bug(s) of 625544: 628254 # pyicu FTBS with ICU 4.8: block 628529 with 628584 Bug #628529 [release.debian.org] transition: ICU transition (4.4 - 4.8) Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 628529: 628584 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 628529: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628529 625544: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625544 625581: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625581 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130676149222469.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: klibc 1.5.20 stable/oldstable update
On Thu, 19 May 2011, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 15:41 +, maximilian attems wrote: * [klibc] ipconfig: comment new escape function security fix for CVE-2011-0997 type vulnerability corresponding cve requested but not yet given out. http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=46a0f831582629612f0ff9707ad1292887f26bff As mentioned on oss-sec, it would be nice if this didn't write to a predictable filename. From the stable update point-of-view though, I realise that's not a regression relative to the current lenny / squeeze versions. It is not of relevance for current pre-init usage, as you don't have unpriviliged users there, but it will get fixed upstream, by making the used dir an optional switch. * [klibc] ipconfig: Only peek and discard packets from specified device. This fixes netbooting on boxes with several connected network dev. (the commit is on the largeish size, but got tested together with 1.5.20) http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=92823d1a78a8a6f3e7a7cc36f949ca6379c4e77c concerning oldstable only the first one should be fixed. ipconfig has deeper troubles there. if acked by SRM I'd upload a klibc-1.5.20-2 with just the 2 aboves fixes for stable and a 1.5.12-3 for oldstable with just the first fix? It's conventional to use e.g. -1+squeeze1, but afaics the above versions have not been previously uploaded to Debian so could be used if you wish. ok cool, used the conventional numbering. I'd appreciate debdiffs for a final check before the uploads, but the above sounds good; thanks. do you mean belows output of debdiff on the dsc files? belows is for stable, oldstable will follow once this is acked. thank you -- maks diff -Nru klibc-1.5.20/debian/changelog klibc-1.5.20/debian/changelog --- klibc-1.5.20/debian/changelog 2010-08-28 13:07:23.0 +0200 +++ klibc-1.5.20/debian/changelog 2011-05-30 17:20:39.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +klibc (1.5.20-1+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low + + * ipconfig: handle multiple connected network dev. (closes: #621065) + * ipconfig: Escape DHCP options. (CVE-2011-1930) + + -- maximilian attems m...@debian.org Mon, 30 May 2011 17:17:18 +0200 + klibc (1.5.20-1) unstable; urgency=high * New upstream release diff -Nru klibc-1.5.20/debian/patches/debian-changes-1.5.20-1 klibc-1.5.20/debian/patches/debian-changes-1.5.20-1 --- klibc-1.5.20/debian/patches/debian-changes-1.5.20-1 2010-08-28 13:09:43.0 +0200 +++ klibc-1.5.20/debian/patches/debian-changes-1.5.20-1 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 @@ -1,54 +0,0 @@ -Description: Upstream changes introduced in version 1.5.20-1 - This patch has been created by dpkg-source during the package build. - Here's the last changelog entry, hopefully it gives details on why - those changes were made: - . - klibc (1.5.20-1) unstable; urgency=high - . - * New upstream release - - ipconfig: fix infinite loop. (closes: #552554) - - ipconfig: fix multiple dns domains. (closes: #594208) - * klibc-utils.postinst: Nuke non empty dirs too. (closes: #594651) - . - The person named in the Author field signed this changelog entry. -Author: maximilian attems m...@debian.org -Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/552554 -Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/594208 -Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/594651 - -The information above should follow the Patch Tagging Guidelines, please -checkout http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ to learn about the format. Here -are templates for supplementary fields that you might want to add: - -Origin: vendor|upstream|other, url of original patch -Bug: url in upstream bugtracker -Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/bugnumber -Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/bugnumber -Forwarded: no|not-needed|url proving that it has been forwarded -Reviewed-By: name and email of someone who approved the patch -Last-Update: -MM-DD - /dev/null -+++ klibc-1.5.20/maketar.sh -@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ -+#!/bin/bash -xe -+# -+# Make a tarball from the current git repository -+# -+ -+[ -z $tmpdir ] tmpdir=/var/tmp -+ -+tmp=$tmpdir/klibc.$$ -+rm -rf $tmp -+cg-export $tmp -+cd $tmp -+make release -+version=`cat usr/klibc/version` -+rm -rf $tmpdir/klibc-$version -+mv $tmp $tmpdir/klibc-$version -+cd .. -+rm -f klibc-$version.tar* -+tar cvvf klibc-$version.tar klibc-$version -+gzip -9 klibc-$version.tar -+rm -rf klibc-$version diff -Nru klibc-1.5.20/debian/patches/debian-changes-1.5.20-1+squeeze1 klibc-1.5.20/debian/patches/debian-changes-1.5.20-1+squeeze1 --- klibc-1.5.20/debian/patches/debian-changes-1.5.20-1+squeeze1 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ klibc-1.5.20/debian/patches/debian-changes-1.5.20-1+squeeze1 2011-05-30 17:27:42.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +Description: Upstream changes introduced in version 1.5.20-1+squeeze1 + This patch has been created by dpkg-source during the package build. + Here's the last changelog entry, hopefully
unblock base-installer 1.119
This version of base-installer is needed by the version of debootstrap that already made its way into testing, so it should be allowed to transition. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#625792: [britney2] Needs to be cleverer at deciding which packages to check for installability
tag 625792 + patch thanks On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 20:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 20:57 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 00:27:18 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: thunar-vfs - the source isn't in testing; so steps A, C and D are skipped - unstable's ristretto doesn't depend on libthunar-vfs-1-2, so the package isn't marked for checking again hrm, but why does unstable's ristretto matter at that point, rather than testing's? (Apologies if I'm missing something obvious.) It's not unstable's ristretto so much as unstable's thunar-vfs. After adding thunar-vfs to testing, the record for the libthunar-vfs-1-2 binary built from that source is copied from unstable to testing, including the previously computed list of reverse dependencies, which is then used to look for affected packages. So, the solution to this turned out to be reasonably simple, although it took me a while to see that. iter_packages() has a list of undo dictionaries for the entire exo hint, which includes the fact that the previous version of libthunar-vfs-1-2 had ristretto as a reverse-dependency; the fix is to make doop_source() aware of that undo information. Patch attached. I'll probably push it in a day or so unless anyone yells or points out issues with it. Regards, Adam diff --git a/britney.py b/britney.py index 7c72a56..b03dc0d 100755 --- a/britney.py +++ b/britney.py @@ -1994,9 +1994,12 @@ class Britney: # check the package at the top of the tree return satisfy(pkg) -def doop_source(self, pkg): +def doop_source(self, pkg, hint_undo=[]): Apply a change to the testing distribution as requested by `pkg` +An optional list of undo actions related to packages processed earlier +in a hint may be passed in `hint_undo`. + This method applies the changes required by the action `pkg` tracking them so it will be possible to revert them. @@ -2112,6 +2115,22 @@ class Britney: key = (p, parch) if key not in affected: affected.append(key) self.systems[parch].remove_binary(binary) +else: +# if the binary was previously built by a different +# source package in testing, all of the reverse +# dependencies of the old binary are affected. +# reverse dependencies built from this source can be +# ignored as their reverse trees are already handled +# by this function +# XXX: and the reverse conflict tree? +for (tundo, tpkg, tpkg_name, tsuite) in hint_undo: +if p in tundo['binaries']: +for rdep in tundo['binaries'][p][RDEPENDS]: +if rdep in binaries[parch][0] and rdep not in source[BINARIES]: +affected.append( (rdep, parch) ) +affected.extend( [ (x, parch) for x in \ +self.get_reverse_tree(rdep, parch, 'testing') ] ) +affected = list(set(affected)) # add/update the binary package binaries[parch][0][binary] = self.binaries[suite][parch][0][binary] self.systems[parch].add_binary(binary, binaries[parch][0][binary][:PROVIDES] + \ @@ -2258,7 +2277,7 @@ class Britney: if pkg in pre_process: pkg_name, suite, affected, undo = pre_process[pkg] else: -pkg_name, suite, affected, undo = self.doop_source(pkg) +pkg_name, suite, affected, undo = self.doop_source(pkg, lundo) if hint: lundo.append((undo, pkg, pkg_name, suite))
Processed: Re: Bug#625792: [britney2] Needs to be cleverer at deciding which packages to check for installability
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tag 625792 + patch Bug #625792 [release.debian.org] [britney2] Needs to be cleverer at deciding which packages to check for installability Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 625792: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625792 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130678292426105.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: retitle 622279 to transition: python-defaults (switching default: 2.6 - 2.7), tagging 622279 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 622279 transition: python-defaults (switching default: 2.6 - 2.7) Bug #622279 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults Changed Bug title to 'transition: python-defaults (switching default: 2.6 - 2.7)' from 'transition: python-defaults' tags 622279 - pending Bug #622279 [release.debian.org] transition: python-defaults (switching default: 2.6 - 2.7) Removed tag(s) pending. unblock 620975 with 622279 Bug #620975 [release.debian.org] transition: python-apt Was blocked by: 572072 617272 604544 572087 572350 622279 572059 Removed blocking bug(s) of 620975: 622279 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 620975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=620975 622279: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622279 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13067856502944.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze2_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze2_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze2_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze2_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze2_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze2_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze2_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: chromium-browser_6.0.472.63~r59945-5+squeeze5_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: chromium-browser_6.0.472.63~r59945-5+squeeze5_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: chromium-browser_6.0.472.63~r59945-5+squeeze5_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: mahara_1.2.6-2+squeeze2_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qr8yh-0002xj...@franck.debian.org
[SRM] Stable update for gwrite
Hi,
I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached debdiff).
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
diff -u gwrite-0.3.0/debian/changelog gwrite-0.3.0/debian/changelog
--- gwrite-0.3.0/debian/changelog
+++ gwrite-0.3.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+gwrite (0.3.0-2) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/control:
+- Change to @debian.org address.
+- Add python-support (= 0.90) to Depends to avoid missing
+ python-support (E: missing-dependency-on-python-support).
+ * debian/dirs:
+- Removed, uselessly installed empty directory /usr/sbin.
+
+ -- Aron Xu a...@debian.org Tue, 31 May 2011 07:22:41 +0800
+
gwrite (0.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release:
diff -u gwrite-0.3.0/debian/control gwrite-0.3.0/debian/control
--- gwrite-0.3.0/debian/control
+++ gwrite-0.3.0/debian/control
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
Source: gwrite
Section: editors
Priority: optional
-Maintainer: Aron Xu happyaron...@gmail.com
+Maintainer: Aron Xu a...@debian.org
Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (= 7), python, python-support, python-setuptools, python-distutils-extra
Standards-Version: 3.8.4
Homepage: http://code.google.com/p/gwrite
Package: gwrite
Architecture: all
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, python, python-gtk2, python-jswebkit, python-webkit, mimetex, wv
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, python, python-gtk2, python-jswebkit, python-webkit, mimetex, wv, python-support (= 0.90)
Description: simple GTK+ HTML5 rich text editor
gWrite is a simple GTK+ HTML5 WYSIWYG editor, focusing on writing
and simple text formating. It can automatically generate a table of
reverted:
--- gwrite-0.3.0/debian/dirs
+++ gwrite-0.3.0.orig/debian/dirs
@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
-usr/bin
-usr/sbin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
