Re: poppler transition
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:20:18AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:14:16AM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Is there a approximate time scale for that, as we are having a serious bug that makes tex segfault *every*time*, so we would like to upload sooner or later ... thus: - is there an expected transition end time? - can you please send out an email when it is done What's the bug number? #633011 Why isn't it RC? But if it's indeed introduced with the latest binNMU for the poppler transition I'd rather like to see a sourceful upload with only that fix, urgency=high. Ping!? Should I wait for that or not? Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#633611: marked as done (unblock: shibboleth-sp2/2.4.2+dfsg-2 (armel problems))
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:40:08 +0200 with message-id 20110719124008.ga11...@thrall.0x539.de and subject line Re: Bug#633611: unblock: shibboleth-sp2/2.4.2+dfsg-2 (armel problems) has caused the Debian Bug report #633611, regarding unblock: shibboleth-sp2/2.4.2+dfsg-2 (armel problems) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 633611: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633611 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hello folks, I'm not quite sure what to do with this, and perhaps I should be filing a bug against ftp.debian.org for an architecture removal, but I'll file it here as a weird sort of unblock first to see if that's the right thing to do. The problem is that g++ bug #630752 means that shibboleth-sp2 cannot build on armel (the bug is present even when built with no optimization), which is now blocking migration of xml-security-c (along with xmltooling, opensaml2, and shibboleth-sp2), which has a security fix. I don't know what the options are here. Is there a way to force the migration and temporarily pull shibboleth-sp2 from testing for armel? I don't really want to remove the binaries from unstable as well, since the package really *should* build for armel and will again as soon as this bug is fixed, but maybe that's the right short-term fix? -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-2-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 03:06:01PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes: In the meantime I signed the missing powerpc build. As soon as we get xml-security-c accepted into proposed-updates we can copy it over to testing, as it would be higher otherwise. That should solve the security issue too, no? Oh, yes. That's probably an even better solution. Thank you! Done now. Sorry for the delay. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Re: poppler transition
On 15.07.11 Philipp Kern (pk...@debian.org) wrote: On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:14:16AM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hi, #633011 Why isn't it RC? It is now. But if it's indeed introduced with the latest binNMU for the poppler transition I'd rather like to see a sourceful upload with only that fix, urgency=high. The issue seems to be long standing in the source code and seems to have been revealed by a change in the linker. H. -- MAC user's dynamic debugging list evaluator? Never heard of that. http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#634194: libtiff4-dev: Depends on libjpeg-dev even though library is linked against libjpeg62
On 18/07/11 at 20:05 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 19:59:50 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 08:25:08AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: Package: libtiff4-dev Version: 3.9.5-1 Severity: normal As the subject says, libtiff4 currently depends on libjpeg62, while libtiff4-dev depends on libjpeg-dev which is only provided by libjpeg8-dev. So there's a version mismatch there. Hello Daniel, Perhaps all that's needed is a binary-only NMU of the tiff source package -- it looks like it builds fine against libjpeg8 with the current Build-Depends. Yes, only a binary-only NMU is required. Does the temporary mismatch cause any actual issue? 50 to 100 packages failed to build in my latest rebuild because of that. - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110719153002.ga32...@xanadu.blop.info
Re: Bug#634194: libtiff4-dev: Depends on libjpeg-dev even though library is linked against libjpeg62
On 19/07/11 at 18:09 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 05:30:02PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 18/07/11 at 20:05 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 19:59:50 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 08:25:08AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: Package: libtiff4-dev Version: 3.9.5-1 Severity: normal As the subject says, libtiff4 currently depends on libjpeg62, while libtiff4-dev depends on libjpeg-dev which is only provided by libjpeg8-dev. So there's a version mismatch there. Hello Daniel, Perhaps all that's needed is a binary-only NMU of the tiff source package -- it looks like it builds fine against libjpeg8 with the current Build-Depends. Yes, only a binary-only NMU is required. Does the temporary mismatch cause any actual issue? 50 to 100 packages failed to build in my latest rebuild because of that. Could you point to some of them ? I know about 62 packages with conflicting build-dependency but this is unrelated to this discrepancy. (At least a binary-only NMU of libtiff4 would not fix that). Ah, I was talking about those ones, sorry. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110719161326.ga1...@xanadu.blop.info
Re: Bug#634194: libtiff4-dev: Depends on libjpeg-dev even though library is linked against libjpeg62
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 05:30:02PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 18/07/11 at 20:05 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 19:59:50 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 08:25:08AM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: Package: libtiff4-dev Version: 3.9.5-1 Severity: normal As the subject says, libtiff4 currently depends on libjpeg62, while libtiff4-dev depends on libjpeg-dev which is only provided by libjpeg8-dev. So there's a version mismatch there. Hello Daniel, Perhaps all that's needed is a binary-only NMU of the tiff source package -- it looks like it builds fine against libjpeg8 with the current Build-Depends. Yes, only a binary-only NMU is required. Does the temporary mismatch cause any actual issue? 50 to 100 packages failed to build in my latest rebuild because of that. Could you point to some of them ? I know about 62 packages with conflicting build-dependency but this is unrelated to this discrepancy. (At least a binary-only NMU of libtiff4 would not fix that). Cheers, Bill. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110719160947.GK24411@yellowpig
Bug#634753: RM: lxde-settings-daemon/0.4.1-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Doesn't need anymore in LXDE since it serged in lxsession 0.4.1 in upstream. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=zh_TW.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110719195001.16563.64437.reportbug@magabahi
Re: Please configure mirroring for the Release Team's git repositories
This one time, at band camp, Adam D. Barratt said: Sorry to be a pain, but would it be possible to update the repository descriptions to those below, so that they show up in gitweb as something more helpful than the default unnamed repository? I did include descriptions in the original mail, but probably didn't make them obvious enough; apologies for that. Done. Cheers, -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :sg...@debian.org | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#634753: RM: lxde-settings-daemon/0.4.1-2
On 07/19/2011 09:50 PM, Andrew Lee (李健秋) wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Doesn't need anymore in LXDE since it serged in lxsession 0.4.1 in upstream. Do you want it removed from testing only, or sid *and* (therefore) testing? If the latter, then please reassign to ftp.debian.org Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e25e396.60...@dogguy.org
Processed: Re: Bug#634753: RM: lxde-settings-daemon/0.4.1-2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 634753 ftp.debian.org Bug #634753 [release.debian.org] RM: lxde-settings-daemon/0.4.1-2 Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'. retitle 634753 RM: lxde-settings-daemon -- RoM; obsoleted by lxsession Bug #634753 [ftp.debian.org] RM: lxde-settings-daemon/0.4.1-2 Changed Bug title to 'RM: lxde-settings-daemon -- RoM; obsoleted by lxsession' from 'RM: lxde-settings-daemon/0.4.1-2' user ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to ftp.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). usertags 634753 rm Bug#634753: RM: lxde-settings-daemon -- RoM; obsoleted by lxsession There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: rm. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 634753: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634753 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131110595514919.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#634753: RM: lxde-settings-daemon/0.4.1-2
reassign 634753 ftp.debian.org retitle 634753 RM: lxde-settings-daemon -- RoM; obsoleted by lxsession user ftp.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 634753 rm thanks On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 03:50 +0800, Andrew Lee wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Doesn't need anymore in LXDE since it serged in lxsession 0.4.1 in upstream. Then you want to be asking the FTP Team to remove it from unstable. Reassigning. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1311105875.8028.12.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-authnz-external_3.2.4-2+squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-authnz-external_3.2.4-2+squeeze1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-authnz-external_3.2.4-2+squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-authnz-external_3.2.4-2+squeeze1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-authnz-external_3.2.4-2+squeeze1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-authnz-external_3.2.4-2+squeeze1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-authnz-external_3.2.4-2+squeeze1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-authnz-external_3.2.4-2+squeeze1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-authnz-external_3.2.4-2+squeeze1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-authnz-external_3.2.4-2+squeeze1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libapache2-mod-authnz-external_3.2.4-2+squeeze1_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze2_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze2_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze2_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze2_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze2_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.8.3-5+squeeze2_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qjgqf-0001hn...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in oldproposedupdates
Processing changes file: libvirt_0.4.6-10+lenny2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.4.6-10+lenny2_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.4.6-10+lenny2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.4.6-10+lenny2_arm.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.4.6-10+lenny2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.4.6-10+lenny2_hppa.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.4.6-10+lenny2_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.4.6-10+lenny2_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.4.6-10+lenny2_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.4.6-10+lenny2_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.4.6-10+lenny2_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libvirt_0.4.6-10+lenny2_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qjgqh-0001i9...@franck.debian.org
Bug#632800: pu: package opencv 2.1.0-3+squeeze1
Hi,
I uploaded package (2.1.0-5) where this bug (#629414 and 610803) had
been corrected to
unstable. It is already in testing.
Can I upload 2.1.0-3+squeeze1 to pu?
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
2011/7/11 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.org:
Hi, Adam.
2011/7/10 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
tag 632800 + moreinfo squeeze
thanks
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 10:03 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
I'd like to upload new version of opencv into s-p-u, which fixes
optimization
of the i386 architecture (#629414) and install path of opencv-doc (#610803).
Please let me know if I can go on with the upload.
The bug status of #629414 is a little odd - and, in fact, wrong. The
bug is both marked as affecting opencv 2.10-4, which is in testing and
unstable, and tagged squeeze, which should only be the case if the
version in stable and testing and/or unstable were the same and only the
stable version is affected by the bug; those two things can't both be
true.
Your indication is right.
My procedure was wrong.
Please confirm whether 2.10-4 is also affected, and then either:
- mark the bug as fixed in 2.10-4
- fix the bug in unstable, and then come back to us regarding fixing it
in stable
This bug is revised with 2.10-5.
I upload this version to unstable soon.
In either case, please remove the squeeze tag from #629414. There is
no reason for it to be applied to that bug.
OK, I removed squeeze tag.
Thanks for your comments.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CABMQnVL=ukedtbwrz-fcn-te31q2v9smi4sldxzs7zvwruv...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#634797: opencv 2.3 transition
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I plan to up-load opencv 2.3 to unstable.
Because soname changes, a re-build is needed in the depending package.
The following packages depend on opencv.
Some packages can not build with opencv 2.3. I have already sent the
bug report and the patch to correct it.
- auto-multiple-choice / FTBFS with opencv 2.3.#634795
- freecad / Build OK
- freej / FTBFS: #631822
- frei0r /FTBFS but this problem is corrected in the package up-loaded
to mentor.debian.net.
- gmic
libjpeg8-dev: Conflicts: libjpeg62-dev but 6b1-2 is to be installed.
blocked #629966
- kipi-plugins / Build OK
- lush / Build OK
- mrpt / FTBFS #625075
- player / Build OK
- sikuli / Build OK
- sivp / FTBFS with opencv 2.3. #634796
Please let me know when I can start the transition of opencv 2.3.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/cabmqnvlo2krjh-+c4tts5qlzpd7yo_k-wmoecg_bybdhscg...@mail.gmail.com
stable-update to amispammer package
Hi,
amispammer package does not work anymore in Gnu Debian Squeeze, I attach the
patch to fix it.
Thank you for your help.
Kind regards,
--
Julián Moreno Patiño
.''`. Debian GNU/{Linux,KfreeBSD}
: :' : Free Operating Systems
`. `' http://debian.org/
`- PGP KEY ID 6168BF60
Registered GNU Linux User ID 488513
Description: Fix detection of the IP address
Forwarded: no
Author: Julián Moreno Patiño darkju...@gmail.com
Last-Update: 2011-07-19
--- a/amispammer 2010-04-30 11:42:33.0 -0500
+++ b/amispammer 2011-05-16 16:39:47.0 -0500
@@ -16,12 +16,12 @@
{
my $detected_ip=NULL;
my $browser = LWP::UserAgent-new;
-my $response = $browser-get(http://www.cualesmiip.es/;);
+my $response = $browser-get(http://checkip.dyndns.org/;);
$respuesta=$response-content;
if ($response-is_success)
{
-my @trozos_init=split (/Tu IP es\\/h1\\h1 align\=\center\\/,$respuesta);
-my @trozos_end=split (/\\/h1\\h2/,$trozos_init[1]);
+my @trozos_init=split (/Current IP Address: /,$respuesta);
+my @trozos_end=split (/\\/body\\\/html\/,$trozos_init[1]);
$detected_ip=$trozos_end[0];
}
return ($detected_ip);
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#634815: pu: package amispammer/3.1-1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
Now amispammer package does not work anymore in GNU Debian Squeeze, please
could you add the attached patch ?
Thank you for your help.
Kind regards,
--
Julián Moreno Patiño
.''`. Debian GNU/{Linux,KfreeBSD}
: :' : Free Operating Systems
`. `' http://debian.org/
`- PGP KEY ID 6168BF60
Registered GNU Linux User ID 488513
Description: Fix detection of the IP address
Forwarded: no
Author: Julián Moreno Patiño darkju...@gmail.com
Last-Update: 2011-07-19
--- a/amispammer 2010-04-30 11:42:33.0 -0500
+++ b/amispammer 2011-05-16 16:39:47.0 -0500
@@ -16,12 +16,12 @@
{
my $detected_ip=NULL;
my $browser = LWP::UserAgent-new;
-my $response = $browser-get(http://www.cualesmiip.es/;);
+my $response = $browser-get(http://checkip.dyndns.org/;);
$respuesta=$response-content;
if ($response-is_success)
{
-my @trozos_init=split (/Tu IP es\\/h1\\h1 align\=\center\\/,$respuesta);
-my @trozos_end=split (/\\/h1\\h2/,$trozos_init[1]);
+my @trozos_init=split (/Current IP Address: /,$respuesta);
+my @trozos_end=split (/\\/body\\\/html\/,$trozos_init[1]);
$detected_ip=$trozos_end[0];
}
return ($detected_ip);
Bug#634797: opencv 2.3 transition
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 01:39:41 (CEST), Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: I plan to up-load opencv 2.3 to unstable. I'm not a release manager, but the Libav maintainer in Debian. Still, could you please consider including the patch from #634818 before uploading to unstable? I'm confident that the #ifdef version checks are a bit too strict and that the patch should also work with some minor adjustments with Libav 0.6 currently in wheezy. Let me know if you experience any trouble. Cheers, -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87y5ztplm7@faui43f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de
