Re: Bug#636643: marked as done (release.debian.org: Please bump urgency of samba to high)
Quoting Paul Wise (p...@debian.org): reportbug reportbug :) #636929 I had a look at reportbug's source code as an attempt to create a patch, but, though I more or less found the place where to put this, I wasn't sure enough of the right things to do.so this is a bug report without patch, sorry. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#636929: release.debian.org: add a template for urgency bumps?
Hello Christian, On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 08:58, Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org wrote: This suggestion comes after sending a BR against release.d.o to request for an urgency bump for a package of mine. I like the use of the BTS for release-related things, with various templates for common actions requested to the release team.It could be good to have a template for urgency bump requests, when one wants to request raising (or lowering) the urgency of a given package in unstable. The template could ask for the source package name, current urgency and target urgency, as well as, of course, a rationale. At least d-release should be added in the loop, in order to allow them to ack/nack the request (ie if they want such requests as bug report of a specific category). Added d-r@ let's see what they say. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAPdtAj3734JVaV7m3gxVn4PHBhmntTr8dgr6=am+0gf4i58...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#636945: pu: package ace/5.7.7-4
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, as per #630897 ace needs to be repackaged in stable only. Details available at [1]; just let me know if something is missing or unclear. Are you OK with uploading this to s-p-u? Thanks, Regards, Thomas [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630897#37 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110807105408.5467.55259.reportbug@gratos
Bug#636630: pu: package clive/2.2.13-5+squeeze3
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes: like to upload clive/2.2.13-5+squeeze3. It adapts the code for URL extraction to recent changes to the youtube.com website[1]. [...] [1] http://bugs.debian.org/636612 Please go ahead; thanks. Uploaded. Thanks :) Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k4ap79sf@marvin.43-1.org
Processed: block 622134 with 622051
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 622051 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 622068 621987 622053 620893 622144 621974 622025 622034 621402 620998 616291 613369 622016 622004 622140 621395 621994 622074 615697 622054 622019 622008 622141 621105 618087 622049 623253 621509 622076 622027 622032 622065 622011 622154 622018 622014 620777 622072 622069 622070 622012 620581 621884 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 622051 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131271973717196.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 565018
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 565018 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 622068 620893 622053 621987 622034 622025 621974 622144 616291 620998 621402 613369 622016 622004 622140 622051 621994 621395 622074 615697 622054 622019 622008 622141 621105 618087 622049 623253 621509 622076 622027 622011 622032 622065 622154 622018 622014 620777 622072 622069 620581 622012 622070 621884 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 565018 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131271987817592.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 622063
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 622063 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 622068 621987 622053 620893 622144 621974 622025 622034 621402 620998 616291 613369 622016 622004 622140 622051 621395 621994 622074 615697 622054 565018 622019 622008 622141 621105 618087 622049 623253 621509 622076 622027 622065 622032 622011 622154 622018 622014 620777 622072 622069 622070 622012 620581 621884 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 622063 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272039919719.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 618228
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 618228 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 622068 620893 622053 621987 622034 622025 621974 622144 616291 620998 621402 613369 622016 622004 622140 622051 621994 621395 622074 622063 615697 622054 565018 622019 622008 622141 621105 618087 622049 623253 621509 622076 622027 622011 622032 622065 622154 622018 622014 620777 622072 622069 620581 622012 622070 621884 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 618228 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272047019878.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 555877
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 555877 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 622068 621987 622053 620893 622144 621974 622025 622034 621402 620998 616291 613369 622016 622004 622140 622051 621395 621994 622074 615697 622063 622054 565018 622019 622008 622141 621105 618087 622049 623253 621509 622027 622076 622065 622032 622011 622154 622018 622014 620777 622072 622069 622070 622012 620581 618228 621884 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 555877 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272055520476.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 618184
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 618184 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 622068 620893 622053 621987 622034 622025 621974 622144 616291 620998 621402 613369 622016 622004 622140 622051 621994 621395 622074 622063 615697 622054 565018 622019 622008 622141 621105 618087 622049 623253 621509 622076 622027 622011 622032 622065 622154 622018 622014 620777 622072 622069 620581 622012 622070 618228 621884 555877 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 618184 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272061220679.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 622031
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 622031 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 622068 621987 622053 620893 622144 621974 622025 622034 621402 620998 616291 613369 622016 622004 622140 622051 621395 621994 622074 615697 622063 622054 565018 622019 622008 622141 621105 618087 622049 623253 621509 622027 622076 622065 622032 622011 622154 622018 622014 618184 620777 622072 622069 622070 622012 620581 618228 621884 555877 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 622031 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272069420864.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 622041
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 622041 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 622068 620893 622053 621987 622034 622025 621974 622144 616291 620998 621402 613369 622016 622004 622140 622031 622051 621994 621395 622074 622063 615697 622054 565018 622019 622008 622141 621105 618087 622049 623253 621509 622076 622027 622011 622032 622065 622154 622018 622014 620777 618184 622072 622069 620581 622012 622070 618228 621884 555877 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 622041 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272079021213.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 622066
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 622066 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 622068 621987 622053 620893 622144 621974 622025 622034 621402 620998 616291 613369 622016 622004 622140 622031 622051 621395 621994 622074 615697 622063 622054 565018 622019 622008 622141 621105 618087 622049 621509 623253 622027 622076 622065 622032 622011 622154 622018 622014 618184 620777 622072 622069 622070 622012 620581 622041 618228 621884 555877 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 622066 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272087721599.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 632532
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 632532 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 622068 620893 622053 621987 622034 622025 621974 622144 616291 620998 621402 613369 622016 622004 622140 622031 622051 621994 621395 622074 622063 615697 622054 565018 622019 622008 622141 621105 618087 622049 623253 621509 622076 622027 622011 622032 622065 622154 622018 622014 620777 618184 622072 622069 620581 622012 622070 618228 622041 621884 555877 622066 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 632532 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272096721896.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 601038
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 601038 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 622068 621987 622053 620893 622144 621974 622025 622034 621402 620998 616291 613369 622016 622004 622140 622031 622051 621395 621994 622074 615697 622063 622054 632532 565018 622019 622008 622141 621105 618087 622049 621509 623253 622027 622076 622065 622032 622011 622154 622018 622014 618184 620777 622072 622069 622070 622012 620581 622041 618228 621884 555877 622066 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 601038 and 615803 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272113422549.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 625184
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 625184 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 601038 622068 620893 622053 621987 622034 622025 621974 622144 616291 620998 621402 613369 622016 622004 622140 622031 622051 615803 621994 621395 622074 622063 615697 622054 632532 565018 622019 622008 622141 621105 618087 622049 623253 621509 622076 622027 622011 622032 622065 622154 622018 622014 620777 618184 622072 622069 620581 622012 622070 618228 622041 621884 555877 622066 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 625184 and 629804 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272121622722.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 615761
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 615761 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 622068 601038 621987 622053 620893 625184 622144 621974 622025 622034 621402 620998 616291 613369 622016 622004 622140 622031 622051 615803 621395 621994 629804 622074 615697 622063 622054 632532 565018 622019 622008 622141 621105 622049 618087 621509 623253 622027 622076 622065 622032 622011 622154 622018 622014 618184 620777 622072 622069 622070 622012 620581 622041 618228 621884 555877 622066 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 615761 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272124022748.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 623923
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 623923 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 601038 622068 620893 622053 621987 625184 622034 622025 621974 622144 616291 620998 621402 613369 622016 622004 622140 622031 622051 615803 621994 621395 622074 629804 622063 615697 622054 632532 565018 622019 622008 622141 621105 615761 618087 622049 623253 621509 622076 622027 622011 622032 622065 622154 622018 622014 620777 618184 622072 622069 620581 622012 622070 618228 622041 621884 555877 622066 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 623923 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272129122836.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 618224
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 618224 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 622068 601038 621987 622053 620893 625184 622144 621974 622025 622034 621402 620998 616291 613369 622016 622004 622140 622031 622051 615803 623923 621395 621994 629804 622074 615697 622063 622054 632532 565018 622019 622008 622141 621105 622049 618087 615761 621509 623253 622027 622076 622065 622032 622011 622154 622018 622014 618184 620777 622072 622069 622070 622012 620581 622041 618228 621884 555877 622066 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 618224 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272132722962.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 554316
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 554316 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 601038 622068 620893 622053 621987 625184 622034 622025 621974 622144 616291 620998 621402 613369 622016 622004 622140 622031 622051 615803 621994 621395 623923 622074 629804 622063 615697 622054 632532 565018 622019 622008 622141 621105 615761 618087 622049 623253 621509 622076 622027 622011 622032 622065 622154 618224 622018 622014 620777 618184 622072 622069 620581 622012 622070 618228 622041 621884 555877 622066 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 554316 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272139523172.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 618110
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 618110 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 622068 601038 621987 622053 620893 625184 622144 621974 622025 622034 621402 620998 616291 613369 622016 622004 622140 622031 622051 554316 615803 623923 621395 621994 629804 622074 615697 622063 622054 632532 565018 622019 622008 622141 621105 622049 618087 615761 621509 623253 622027 622076 622065 622032 622011 622154 618224 622018 622014 618184 620777 622072 622069 622070 622012 620581 622041 618228 621884 555877 622066 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 618110 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272149723763.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 621926
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 621926 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 601038 622068 620893 622053 621987 625184 622034 622025 621974 622144 616291 620998 621402 613369 622016 622004 622140 618110 622031 622051 615803 554316 621994 621395 623923 622074 629804 622063 615697 622054 632532 565018 622019 622008 622141 621105 615761 618087 622049 623253 621509 622076 622027 622011 622032 622065 622154 618224 622018 622014 620777 618184 622072 622069 620581 622012 622070 618228 622041 621884 555877 622066 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 621926 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272151923919.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 629661
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 629661 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 622068 601038 621987 622053 620893 625184 622144 621974 622025 622034 621402 620998 616291 613369 622016 622004 622140 622031 618110 622051 554316 615803 623923 621395 621994 629804 622074 615697 622063 622054 632532 565018 622019 622008 622141 621105 621926 622049 618087 615761 621509 623253 622027 622076 622065 622032 622011 622154 618224 622018 622014 618184 620777 622072 622069 622070 622012 620581 622041 618228 621884 555877 622066 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 629661 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272186225580.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: block 622134 with 636956
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 622134 with 636956 Bug #622134 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl 1.0.0 Was blocked by: 622010 601038 622068 620893 622053 625184 622144 620998 622016 622140 618110 622051 554316 621395 623923 622074 629804 622063 615697 622054 632532 565018 622008 621105 621926 615761 622076 629661 622011 622032 622154 618224 620777 622072 620581 622012 622070 622041 621884 555877 621987 621974 622025 622034 621402 616291 613369 622004 622031 615803 621994 622019 622141 622049 618087 621509 623253 622027 622065 622018 622014 618184 622069 618228 622066 Added blocking bug(s) of 622134: 636956 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 622134: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622134 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131272191425713.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#635974: pu: package win32-loader/0.6.21+squeeze1
Le vendredi, 5 août 2011 20.34:24, Philipp Kern a écrit : On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:44:53PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote: Dear release team, One week ago, Didier Raboud wrote: So in order to fix this, my plan is to upload a win32-loader 0.6.21+squeeze0 to stable(-proposed-update) that would include the following changes: - add a Built-Using field in the binary package (to track GPL-compliance) - add the byhand code, backported from current unstable (to push the standalone version to the archive) - document versions and pointers to sources in the pool/ directories (to enhance documentation) For what is worth, win32-loader 0.7.4 uploaded on thursday includes all those changes and its companion text is now available on the mirrors: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/tools/win32-loader/unstable/win32-loader.txt That would be `pool/main', not `main/pool' in the URLs? Good point, thank you. win32-loader 0.7.4.1 fixes that and has been uploaded right now. By the way, what more should I do to get this fixed ? Cheers, -- OdyX signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#636966: ruby1.9.1: should not bump shlibs with every upload
Package: ruby1.9.1 Version: 1.9.2.180-3 Severity: important ruby blocks other transitions quite easily because it passes -V to dh_mkshlibs. This causes packages that are built against the ruby in unstable to adopt strict dependencies on that particular upstream version. Given that we occassionally encounter FTBFS bugs with ruby, it would help a lot if you could transition to symbol files instead (or any other way that doesn't cause the upstream version to appear unnecessarily). Kind regards and thanks, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#636945: pu: package ace/5.7.7-4
On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 12:54 +0200, Thomas Girard wrote: as per #630897 ace needs to be repackaged in stable only. Details available at [1]; just let me know if something is missing or unclear. [...] [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630897#37 Sorry, this seems to have fallen off our radar at some point. As a general comment, when you're providing pre-built packages for people to check, it's generally helpful if the .dsc / .changes are signed, to provide some sort of trust path for the download. Overall, the re-packaging looks okay; thanks. Checking the diff was made slightly more annoying by the fact that the source package is tarball-in-tarball and packaged in a way that debdiff's automatic support for that format doesn't seem to like, but never mind. One quick question on the changes, however: -ace (5.7.7-4) unstable; urgency=high +ace (5.7.7+dfsg-1) stable; urgency=low [...] +ace (5.7.7-4) unstable; urgency=low Why was the urgency on the -4 stanza changed? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1312731075.31497.36.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Re: Please binNMU libglew1.5 using packages against libglew1.6
On Sunday 07 August 2011 18:30:32 Andreas Metzler wrote: On 2011-08-04 Clara Gnos clara.g...@googlemail.com wrote: [...] Some of them may also have to change their Build-Depends to libglew1.6 | libglew-dev. Currently libglew1.6-dev also provides libglew1.5-dev to fix build problems. Hello, Did the API change incompatibly or is there another reason for changing the name of the -dev package? It looks like the debian maintainer used the soversion in the dev package name. Upstream never said that it became incompatible and I cannot find the important change which would have changed the API. Here the changelog diff: +lib1.6.0/b [04-27-11] +ul +li New extensions: +ul +li GL_AMD_blend_minmax_factor +li GL_AMD_sample_positions +li GL_EXT_x11_sync_object +li GL_NV_texture_multisample +li GL_NV_video_capture +li GLX_NV_video_capture +li WGL_NV_DX_interop +li WGL_NV_video_capture +/ul +li Bug fixes: +ul +li Define GLEW_NO_GLU for no glu dependency. +li mx suffix for GLEW MX libraries, build both libraries by default. +li Cygwin build improvements +li Soname of GLEWmx shared libraries +li Query GL extension string only once +li GLX_OML_sync_control no longer requires C99 +li glDraw*InstancedARB moved from GL_ARB_draw_instanced to GL_ARB_instanced_arrays +li glFramebufferTextureLayerEXT moved from GL_EXT_geometry_shader4 to GL_EXT_texture_array +li Fixes for BSD build +/ul +/ul +/ul Greetings, Glara -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1374515.edezdyv...@sven-desktop.home.narfation.org
Re: Please binNMU libglew1.5 using packages against libglew1.6
On 2011-08-04 Clara Gnos clara.g...@googlemail.com wrote: [...] Some of them may also have to change their Build-Depends to libglew1.6 | libglew-dev. Currently libglew1.6-dev also provides libglew1.5-dev to fix build problems. Hello, Did the API change incompatibly or is there another reason for changing the name of the -dev package? cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110807163032.gd3...@downhill.g.la
Bug#636945: pu: package ace/5.7.7-4
(please leave pkg-ace-devel@ in CC:) Hello, Le 07/08/2011 17:31, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 12:54 +0200, Thomas Girard wrote: as per #630897 ace needs to be repackaged in stable only. Details available at [1]; just let me know if something is missing or unclear. [...] [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630897#37 Sorry, this seems to have fallen off our radar at some point. As a general comment, when you're providing pre-built packages for people to check, it's generally helpful if the .dsc / .changes are signed, to provide some sort of trust path for the download. Sorry about that. Overall, the re-packaging looks okay; thanks. Checking the diff was made slightly more annoying by the fact that the source package is tarball-in-tarball and packaged in a way that debdiff's automatic support for that format doesn't seem to like, but never mind. Yes. Packaging was overhauled in unstable to avoid that. One quick question on the changes, however: -ace (5.7.7-4) unstable; urgency=high +ace (5.7.7+dfsg-1) stable; urgency=low [...] +ace (5.7.7-4) unstable; urgency=low Why was the urgency on the -4 stanza changed? My mistake, good catch, thanks! (I guess I forgot to commit the urgency bump; hence the issue.) I'll make a new package and publish it again at the same location, signed this time. Regards, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e3ecf27.4000...@free.fr
Bug#637008: unblock: libgcrypt11/1.4.6-9
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libgcrypt11 The new upload contains a workaround for 633458 on sparc. Gnutls should now build successfully. Please *also* retry gnutls26 2.12.7-4 on sparc. unblock libgcrypt11/1.4.6-9 thanks, cu andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110807180109.ga10...@downhill.g.la
Bug#637008: marked as done (unblock: libgcrypt11/1.4.6-9)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Aug 2011 20:51:05 +0100 with message-id 1312746665.31497.60.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#637008: unblock: libgcrypt11/1.4.6-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #637008, regarding unblock: libgcrypt11/1.4.6-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 637008: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637008 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libgcrypt11 The new upload contains a workaround for 633458 on sparc. Gnutls should now build successfully. Please *also* retry gnutls26 2.12.7-4 on sparc. unblock libgcrypt11/1.4.6-9 thanks, cu andreas ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 20:01 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: Please unblock package libgcrypt11 I've dropped my block hint and suggested that Julien drop his. The new upload contains a workaround for 633458 on sparc. Gnutls should now build successfully. Please *also* retry gnutls26 2.12.7-4 on sparc. Done; gnutls26/sparc has been uploaded already. Regards, Adam ---End Message---
Bug#637020: pu: package zfsutils/8.1-5
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu This proposed update fixes three problems that may cause boot errors when zfsutils is installed: * Set X-Start-Before: checkroot so that boot doesn't break when fstab relies on ZFS volumes. (Closes: #635627) * Do not mount/unmount filesystems! This may result in unbootable system if their mountpoints collide (typical in a dual-boot machine). Use /etc/fstab instead. * Set X-Stop-After: umountfs to ensure ZVOLs are no longer in use when zfs volfini is called. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.2-1-amd64 Locale: LANG=ca_AD.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_AD.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Index: debian/zfsutils.zfs.init === --- debian/zfsutils.zfs.init (revision 3674) +++ debian/zfsutils.zfs.init (working copy) @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ # Provides: zvol zfs # Required-Start: # Required-Stop: +# X-Start-Before:checkroot +# X-Stop-After: umountfs # Default-Start: S # Default-Stop: 0 6 # Short-Description: Start/stop ZFS subsystem. @@ -41,15 +43,6 @@ esac done - # filesystems - log_progress_msg filesystems - zfs mount -a - RET=$? - if [ $RET != 0 ] ; then - log_end_msg $RET - exit $RET - fi - # end log_end_msg 0 } @@ -82,21 +75,6 @@ exit $RET fi - # filesystems - log_progress_msg filesystems - zfs unshare -a - RET=$? - if [ $RET != 0 ] ; then - log_end_msg $RET - exit $RET - fi - zfs umount -a - RET=$? - if [ $RET != 0 ] ; then - log_end_msg $RET - exit $RET - fi - # end log_end_msg 0 } Index: debian/changelog === --- debian/changelog (revision 3674) +++ debian/changelog (working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ +zfsutils (8.1-5) unstable; urgency=low + + * Set X-Start-Before: checkroot so that boot doesn't break when +fstab relies on ZFS volumes. (Closes: #635627) + * Do not mount/unmount filesystems! This may result in unbootable +system if their mountpoints collide (typical in a dual-boot +machine). Use /etc/fstab instead. + * Set X-Stop-After: umountfs to ensure ZVOLs are no longer in use +when zfs volfini is called. + + -- Robert Millan r...@debian.org Sun, 07 Aug 2011 20:31:55 + + zfsutils (8.1-4) unstable; urgency=low * Create a /boot/zfs/ directory in zfsutils-udeb, so that zpool.cache
Bug#637020: pu: package zfsutils/8.1-5
Hi, On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 08:45:21PM +, Robert Millan wrote: This proposed update fixes three problems that may cause boot errors when zfsutils is installed: [...] * Do not mount/unmount filesystems! This may result in unbootable system if their mountpoints collide (typical in a dual-boot machine). Use /etc/fstab instead. I presume that it would still unshare the volume prior to umount? Your change seems to contradict the OpenSolaris ZFS documentation[1]. It postulates that automatic mount management is what you want and the other way is legacy. Now the consequence of that chance is that the ZFS data structures tell that they should be automounted at $location but we ignore that now? Doesn't that have the potential for breakage upon the next reboot after installing that stable update? (Especially for machines with a single kFreeBSDZFS instance, i.e. servers?) Kind regards, Philipp Kern [1] http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/ZFSADMIN/gaynd.html#gamnd -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#637040: RM: t1lib/5.1.2-3
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Severity: normal Hi, t1lib has a significant set of security vulnerablities [0] and there is no sign of them ever getting fixed with upstream missing in action for over three years now. Because of these issues, xpdf for example has dropped support for it in favor of freetype2 [1]. poppler did this a long time ago as well. There are a few reverse dependencies, which could also be updated to use freetype instead. These include: php5 (php5-gd binary package) xdvik-ja vflib3 matita libimager-perl lablgtkmathview grace evince (libevince3 binary package) dvipng I would recommend removing t1lib from the archive. If the release team concurs with this, I will file serious bugs against the reverse dependencies. Once that's done and everyone is in concurrance, I'll send a message to the ftp masters for removal. Best wishes, Mike [0] http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/t1lib [1] http://www.foolabs.com/xpdf/download.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110807203604.06212194.michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: clive_2.2.13-5+squeeze3_multi.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: typo3-src_4.3.9+dfsg1-1+squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qqf1g-00038f...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in oldproposedupdates
Processing changes file: typo3-src_4.2.5-1+lenny8_i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qqf1h-00038v...@franck.debian.org
