Bug#660211: nmu: kstars_4:4.7.4-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, please rebuild kstars in experimental to followup the libindi 0.9 transition (it had no rdeps in unstable/testing) I did few weeks ago. nmu kstars_4:4.7.4-1 . ALL . -m libindi 0.9 transition Thanks, -- Pino -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120217121314.18477.23581.reportbug@localhost.localdomain
Bug#660211: marked as done (nmu: kstars_4:4.7.4-1)
Your message dated Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:09:32 + with message-id 53122ed228527bbedf474cffd7cf2...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#660211: nmu: kstars_4:4.7.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #660211, regarding nmu: kstars_4:4.7.4-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 660211: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660211 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, please rebuild kstars in experimental to followup the libindi 0.9 transition (it had no rdeps in unstable/testing) I did few weeks ago. nmu kstars_4:4.7.4-1 . ALL . -m libindi 0.9 transition Thanks, -- Pino ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 17.02.2012 12:13, Pino Toscano wrote: please rebuild kstars in experimental to followup the libindi 0.9 transition (it had no rdeps in unstable/testing) I did few weeks ago. nmu kstars_4:4.7.4-1 . ALL . -m libindi 0.9 transition Scheduled, as: wb nmu kstars . ALL . experimental . -m Rebuild against libindi0a Regards, Adam ---End Message---
Bug#660022: transition: freebsd-libs
Hi all, I am not sure but I think the parameters used on the transition page lead to several false positives (or false bads): the tail of the criteria for being good is: [...] | .depends ~ /libusb2debian/ | .depends ~ /libusbhid4debian/ the tail of the criteria for being bad is: [...] | .depends ~ /libusb2/ | .depends ~ /libusbhid4/ So all packages that already depend on libusb2debian or libusbhid4debian as they should are classified as bad packages. Again, I am not sure, I might have missed some details since it is the first transition I take part. But from what I see, the parameters should be corrected. Cheers Nicolas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#660022: transition: freebsd-libs
On 17.02.2012 17:06, Nicolas Bourdaud wrote: I am not sure but I think the parameters used on the transition page lead to several false positives (or false bads): the tail of the criteria for being good is: [...] | .depends ~ /libusb2debian/ | .depends ~ /libusbhid4debian/ the tail of the criteria for being bad is: [...] | .depends ~ /libusb2/ | .depends ~ /libusbhid4/ So all packages that already depend on libusb2debian or libusbhid4debian as they should are classified as bad packages. Again, I am not sure, I might have missed some details since it is the first transition I take part. But from what I see, the parameters should be corrected. Fixed; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1fb93d0fe4a86cd3e91f085baa1e6...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#631019: HDF5 transition, the return!
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 19:35:31 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: - 657669: cdo build-depends (indirectly) on the serial and mpi versions of hdf5, which aren't co-installable - 658307: minc, same issue as cdo - 658281: adios, same issue as cdo I've pushed to http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/jcristau/hdf5.git a change which should help with this. I'll probably upload something based on that tomorrow unless I hear otherwise. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
NEW changes in oldproposedupdates
Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_amd64.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_alpha.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_hppa.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_i386.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_ia64.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_mips.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_mipsel.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_powerpc.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_s390.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_sparc.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_amd64.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_alpha.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_hppa.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_i386.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_ia64.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_mips.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_mipsel.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_powerpc.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_s390.changes Rejecting. REJECT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_sparc.changes Rejecting. REJECT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ryspm-0001wx...@franck.debian.org
Bug#660022: transition: freebsd-libs
Nicolas Bourdaud nicolas.bourd...@gmail.com (17/02/2012): I am not sure but I think the parameters used on the transition page lead to several false positives (or false bads): the tail of the criteria for being good is: [...] | .depends ~ /libusb2debian/ | .depends ~ /libusbhid4debian/ the tail of the criteria for being bad is: [...] | .depends ~ /libusb2/ | .depends ~ /libusbhid4/ So all packages that already depend on libusb2debian or libusbhid4debian as they should are classified as bad packages. Again, I am not sure, I might have missed some details since it is the first transition I take part. But from what I see, the parameters should be corrected. Current parameters aren't too good: Some packages were missing, so I decided to widen the search perimeter but was in a hurry so stuff needs fixing. That will be tweaked later on. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#656839: libosip2 upload to unstable
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 05:39:14 Hector Oron wrote: I would like to check if there is something holding RC fix in unstable for libosip2 package. Currently it is blocking some packages to build on armhf and s390x. If you dont have the time, would you have anything against unstable NMU? Hector, We are currently awaiting a transition slot via debian-release. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656839 According to the endorsed workflow, we should not upload to unstable without approval from the release team: http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions So please do not NMU, until this cordination is complete. Mark signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
NEW changes in oldproposedupdates
Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_hppa.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny2_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_alpha.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_hppa.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: opie_2.32-10.2+lenny1_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rywa1-0001pn...@franck.debian.org
