urgency bump samba for CVE-2012-1182
Dear release team, Can you consider to urgency bump samba/2:3.6.4-1 for security issue CVE-2012-1182? The debdiff is indeed 2 MB, however, this is because the bug is in the source for generated code which makes the resulting diff rather large. The upstream release contains no other changes. I'm attaching the diffstat. As this is a rather serious and publicised issue, an urgency bump would be particularly appreciated, if possible. thanks, Thijs samba_sid.diffstat Description: Binary data
Re: False negative in ben?
On 06/04/12 16:16, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Le 06/04/2012 13:00, Joachim Breitner a écrit : I regularly check http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html, it is a great tool. But I am confused why it says haskell-sfml-audio, -openal and -alut is bad on armel armhf mips mipsel ppc s390 s390x. According to the parameters, this means that some of the packages of the source are uninstallable, but edos-debcheck or apt-get install in a chroot work flawlessly. Ben considers only the latest version of arch:all packages, whereas dak waits for the source package to be built on $arch before making the new versions of its arch:all packages available on $arch. and this is also true for all binary packages (arch:any too) and source packages… in ben. I'm not sure exactly what the desired behaviour is in this case... Britney does the same. So I'm not sure we should modify this behavior. It seems a sane filter when considering the migration problem. My 2cents, -- Mehdi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f86fb93.6000...@debian.org
Re: urgency bump samba for CVE-2012-1182
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 16:24:56 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: As this is a rather serious and publicised issue, an urgency bump would be particularly appreciated, if possible. I made it 2 days. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#668461: marked as done (RM: request-tracker3.8/3.8.11-1)
Your message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:40:33 +0200 with message-id 20120412184033.gw22...@radis.cristau.org and subject line Re: Bug#668461: RM: request-tracker3.8/3.8.11-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #668461, regarding RM: request-tracker3.8/3.8.11-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 668461: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668461 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Hello, request-tracker3.8 represents an old (in deep maintenance mode by upstream) branch of RT, and it shouldn't be released with wheezy. There is an RC bug #647126 to hint that it shouldn't be released, but I'd quite like to have it removed from testing now to bring any issues out of the woodwork before it is removed altogether (having it unstable for a little while long will also be useful for maintaining backports, should there be further upstream releases). Thanks, Dominic. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 00:13:41 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: request-tracker3.8 represents an old (in deep maintenance mode by upstream) branch of RT, and it shouldn't be released with wheezy. There is an RC bug #647126 to hint that it shouldn't be released, but I'd quite like to have it removed from testing now to bring any issues out of the woodwork before it is removed altogether (having it unstable for a little while long will also be useful for maintaining backports, should there be further upstream releases). remove hint added. Might be worth filing a bug against the release-notes pseudo-package (tagged 'wheezy') so we don't forget to mention this before the release, if there's something users need to do to get their installation properly upgraded? Thanks, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Processed: tagging 667863
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 667863 + pending Bug #667863 [release.debian.org] transition: octave 3.2 - 3.6 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 667863: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667863 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13342717263594.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Permission to upload armadillo (was Uploading armadillo: soname change)
Dear Release Team, On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:47:13PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote: Thanks for the pointer. I have ensured that the reverse dependencies build fine. Now, I am ready to go ahead and upload it and request binNMUs, if the release team is all right with it. Armadillo 3 has been released with an soname change. The revers dependencies gdal and dolfin build fine, so a binNMU should be sufficient. May I go ahead and upload the new package to unstable? Thanks. Kumar -- Not only Guinness - Linux is good for you, too. -- Banzai on IRC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120413015442.ga15...@bluemoon.alumni.iitm.ac.in
fsl got stuck in Needs-Build state on some architectures
please hint fsl 4.1.9-4+b1 on armel, mips, mipsel. It seems to have got stuck on these architectures for about 6 days according to https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=fsl thanks -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jm88lm$do2$1...@dough.gmane.org
Re: fsl got stuck in Needs-Build state on some architectures
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 00:05 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: please hint fsl 4.1.9-4+b1 on armel, mips, mipsel. It seems to have got stuck on these architectures for about 6 days according to https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=fsl hint is a testing migration term, it doesn't really mean anything in terms of buildds. In any case, as mentioned on IRC the cause is most likely simply that the package is non-free and will therefore get a very low build priority. If further information than that is needed, please contact the buildd admins ($a...@buildd.debian.org). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1334293055.3065.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
