Bug#683367: unblock: ffgtk/0.8.1-2

[Rolf Leggewie]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package ffgtk 0.8.1-2 which fixes an FTBFS induced by
changes in libcapi20-dev upstream.  I've also taken the liberty to
update the watch file to make it work again despite upstream blocking
straight access to directories now.  Debdiff is attached for your
kind review.
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 047070f..0825a42 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ffgtk (0.8.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * add patch to compile ffgtk against libcapi v3.25. Closes: #680813
+  * unbreak the watch file, upstream disallows direct directory access now
+
+ -- Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz  Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:57:12 +0800
+
 ffgtk (0.8.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * initial release. Closes: #602723, LP: #522644.
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index d3dde38..9e31ba5 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Priority: extra
 Maintainer: Rolf Leggewie f...@rolf.leggewie.biz
 Uploaders: Jan-Michael Brummer jan.brum...@tabos.org
 Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7.0.50~), libxml2-dev, libcurl4-gnutls-dev,
- libspandsp-dev, intltool, libtool, libsndfile-dev, libcapi20-dev (= 3.22),
+ libspandsp-dev, intltool, libtool, libsndfile-dev, libcapi20-dev (= 1:3.24),
  libdbus-glib-1-dev, libebook1.2-dev, libgnome-keyring-dev, libasound2-dev,
  libspeex-dev, libspeexdsp-dev, libpulse-dev, libnotify-dev, dh-autoreconf,
  libgtk-3-dev | libgtk2.0-dev
diff --git a/debian/patches/build-with-i4l-v3.25.patch b/debian/patches/build-with-i4l-v3.25.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..5f8525b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/build-with-i4l-v3.25.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Description: build successfully against version 3.25 of isdnutils
+Author: Jan-Michael Brummer
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/680813
+Forwarded: not-needed, latest ffgtk upstream does not need this anymore
+Last-Update: 2012-07-20
+
+--- ffgtk-0.8.1.orig/ffgtk/faxophone/faxophone.c
 ffgtk-0.8.1/ffgtk/faxophone/faxophone.c
+@@ -1538,7 +1538,10 @@ struct sSession *faxophoneInit( struct s
+ 
+ 	if ( psSession == NULL ) {
+ 		if ( pnHost != NULL ) {
+-			setHostName( pnHost );
++			capi20ext_set_driver( fritzbox );
++			capi20ext_set_host( ( char * ) pnHost );
++			capi20ext_set_port( 5031 );
++			capi20ext_set_tracelevel( 0 );
+ 		}
+ 
+ 		nApplId = capiInit( nController );
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index 26c8ab4..cba2577 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 po-files.patch
+build-with-i4l-v3.25.patch
diff --git a/debian/watch b/debian/watch
index 9a83286..de64fbc 100644
--- a/debian/watch
+++ b/debian/watch
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 version=3
-http://www.tabos.org/ffgtk/download/ffgtk-(.*)\.tar\.bz2
+http://www.tabos.org/ffgtk/download.php .*/ffgtk-(.*)\.tar\.bz2

Bug#661078: britney: ignore additional packages in Sources index

[Ansgar Burchardt]

Hi,

Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net writes:
 On 2012-02-24 01:22, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
 I would like to include additional packages referenced by Built-Using in
 the Sources index[1] at some undefined point in the future.  This might
 confuse britney which would need to just ignore them.
 
 Ansgar
 
 [1] http://bugs.debian.org/657212

 In light of our IRC chat in #d-ftp today and the asumption that the
 Only-Extra-Source field will be implemented, I believe I have a
 trivial patch that will work[1].  There is an updated test for it in the
 britney2-tests[2] (the new repository announced today - not the old one).
   The patch is backwards compatible and could be applied before the
 extra sources appear in the Sources files (and without updating any of
 the unrelated existing tests).

I remembered we don't have overrides and thus no Priority or Section
fields for the extra sources.  As even the current values for overrides
aren't that useful (most source packages have Priority: source), I had
an alternative idea:

Instead of introducing a new field, use Priority: optional for regular
sources and Priority: extra for the extra sources introduced by
Built-Using.  At least the latter would also go to Section: source.

This would also fix #626394 (Priority: source in Sources).

Ansgar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ehns8k1x@deep-thought.43-1.org

Bug#661078: britney: ignore additional packages in Sources index

[Niels Thykier]

On 2012-07-31 09:30, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
 Hi,
 
 [...]
 
 I remembered we don't have overrides and thus no Priority or Section
 fields for the extra sources.  As even the current values for overrides
 aren't that useful (most source packages have Priority: source), I had
 an alternative idea:
 
 Instead of introducing a new field, use Priority: optional for regular
 sources and Priority: extra for the extra sources introduced by
 Built-Using.  At least the latter would also go to Section: source.
 
 This would also fix #626394 (Priority: source in Sources).
 
 Ansgar
 
 

Short: Sounds good to me.


AFAICT, we don't use Priority for any thing in Britney, so it won't
cause a lot of issues.  The only thing is that Britney does not include
Priority in the control files she writes.
  However, I believe she is the only consumer of those control files.
If we assume Priority: optional if the field is missing, this should
not be an issue[1].

If you change the value of the source field, that should also be fine.
I see it is written to the HeidiResult file, but I think that
particular column is stripped by another of our scripts before it is
passed on (I think we use that column to strip out our faux packages).

~Niels

[1] The filtering would ensure that she would never write a Priority:
extra source in the control files, so the assumption should be reasonable.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50179349.2020...@thykier.net

Bug#683243: unblock: keystone/2012.1.1-2

[Niels Thykier]

tags 683243 + moreinfo
thanks

On 2012-07-30 07:19, Thomas Goirand wrote:
 Package: release.debian.org
 Severity: normal
 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
 Usertags: unblock
 
 Dear Release Team,
 
 The new Keystone package, currently available in SID, contains
 reviewed Debconf templates and lots of translations, thanks to
 the work of Bubulle.
 
 Please unblock keystone/2012.1.1-2.
 
 Thanks in advance,
 
 Thomas Goirand (zigo)
 
 

Hi,

It seems like the new version introduces #683337?

~Niels


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5017953f.9000...@thykier.net

Processed: Re: Bug#683243: unblock: keystone/2012.1.1-2

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 683243 + moreinfo
Bug #683243 [release.debian.org] unblock: keystone/2012.1.1-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
683243: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683243
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.134372282317556.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#683299: marked as done (unblock: open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:24:39 +0200
with message-id 20120731082439.gh5...@halon.org.uk
and subject line Closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #683299,
regarding unblock: open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
683299: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683299
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-2 would have migrated in time,
2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3 fixes the FTBFS of the dkms module.

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:  daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:   http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Maintainer refuses to justify changes. Closing.

Neil
-- 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---

Bug#683342: unblock: e2fsprogs/1.42.5-1

[Niels Thykier]

On 2012-07-31 00:39, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
 Package: release.debian.org
 Severity: normal
 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
 Usertags: unblock
 
 Please unblock package e2fsprogs
 
 This fixes a number of fairly serious bugs:
   * It fixes a foreign multiarch bug (#678395), and multiarch is a
   release goal
   * It fixes a bug (#682592) which could cause logsave to hang in
   /etc/init.d/checkroot
   * It fixes a bug which could cause a file system to be checked on every
   single boot, despite the file system appearing clean
 
 There are a number of other bugs fixed; see the changelog for more details.
 
 unblock e2fsprogs/1.42.5-1
 
 [...]

Hi,

Not sure if you are aware of it, but d-i has requested us to hold all
udebs for now.  So it may be a while before you get a final answer on
this request.

Also (in answer to your other email), I believe it is fine with
requesting them already now so we are aware of them.  :)

Anyhow, I gave it a short look and...
 * All debian patches appear to have been removed.  By the looks they
   were fetched from upstream so I guess they were backports that are
   no longer needed?  (I am asking because there is no mention of them
   in d/changelog as far as I can tell)
 * Did you intend to include tune2fs.8.in.bak e2fsck.8.in.bak?

~Niels


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50179746.5090...@thykier.net

Bug#683351: marked as done (unblock: desktop-base/7.0.2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:33:32 +0200
with message-id 5017985c.4070...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#683351: unblock: desktop-base/7.0.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #683351,
regarding unblock: desktop-base/7.0.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
683351: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683351
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package desktop-base

people seem to not like dconf.

diff attached.

unblock desktop-base/7.0.2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- 
 .''`.  Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :'  : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'`  4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352  D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
diff -Nru desktop-base-7.0.1/debian/changelog desktop-base-7.0.2/debian/changelog
--- desktop-base-7.0.1/debian/changelog	2012-07-29 19:23:09.0 -0400
+++ desktop-base-7.0.2/debian/changelog	2012-07-30 19:43:22.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+desktop-base (7.0.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Droped the ${misc:Depends}, as Yves-Alexis pointed out, it drags in dconf
+without a reason.
+
+ -- Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org  Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:43:20 -0400
+
 desktop-base (7.0.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Eshat Cakar ]
diff -Nru desktop-base-7.0.1/debian/control desktop-base-7.0.2/debian/control
--- desktop-base-7.0.1/debian/control	2012-07-14 21:18:58.0 -0400
+++ desktop-base-7.0.2/debian/control	2012-07-30 19:41:47.0 -0400
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 
 Package: desktop-base
 Architecture: all
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, librsvg2-common
+Depends: librsvg2-common
 Pre-Depends: dpkg (= 1.15.7.2~)
 Suggests: gnome | kde-standard | xfce4 | wmaker
 Description: common files for the Debian Desktop


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 2012-07-31 02:30, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
 Package: release.debian.org
 Severity: normal
 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
 Usertags: unblock
 
 Please unblock package desktop-base
 
 people seem to not like dconf.
 
 diff attached.
 
 unblock desktop-base/7.0.2
 
 [...]


Unblocked, thanks.


~Niels---End Message---

Bug#683142: unblock: bdii/5.2.12-1

[Mattias Ellert]

sön 2012-07-29 klockan 12:46 +0200 skrev Niels Thykier:
 On 2012-07-29 06:47, Mattias Ellert wrote:
  Package: release.debian.org
  Severity: normal
  User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
  Usertags: freeze-exception
  
  unblock bdii/5.2.12-1
  
  Hi!
  
  The bdii package was removed from testing due to an RC bug, together
  with the packages that depends on it. The 5.2.12-1 update fixes the RC
  bug (bug #663444). I would like to request a freeze exception for this
  update to allow the bdii package and the packages depending on it to be
  part of the release.
  
  Mattias
  
 
 Why did you include a new upstream release in this?  It makes it harder
 for us to review and reduces the chance for you to get the unblock?
 Does this upstream release have important bug fixes, if so what are they?

I had been preparing an update to a new upstream release for a long time
before finally making the upload. On several occasions I have completed
a potential update and then looked at the BTS and thought that I should
fix that RC bug before doing the upload. Since fixing the RC bug was not
trivial this always ment that I held off doing the upload. I finally did
fix the RC bug. The fixed package compared to the last package I
prepared and did not upload was really just fixing the RC bug.

The changes in the package between the previous upload and the new one
are very minor. It is true that if you list the files changed the list
is not short, but most of the changed files are in the debian directory.
These changes are there to do the fix of the RC bug, fix some lintian
warnings and update the copyright file to the new recommended format.
The changes to the patches are just dropping the parts of the patches
that were accepted upstream and rebasing the remaining parts.

For the changes to the upstream itself, i.e. the files outside the
debian directory. These are mainly changes to the default configuration
to reduce the memory consumption and to add support for IPv6.

 --- bdii-5.2.5/debian/bdii.preinst
 +++ bdii-5.2.12/debian/bdii.preinst
 @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
 +#!/bin/sh
 +
 +set -e
 +
 +if [ $1 = upgrade ] ; then
 +if dpkg --compare-versions $2 lt 5.2.12 ; then
 +# Old versions with slapd configs listed in conffiles
 +   if [ -w /var/lib/dpkg/info/bdii.conffiles ] ; then
 +   sed -e /bdii-slapd.conf/d -e /bdii-top-slapd.conf/d \
 +   -i /var/lib/dpkg/info/bdii.conffiles
 +   fi
 +   rm -f /etc/bdii/bdii-slapd.conf /etc/bdii/bdii-top-slapd.conf
 +fi
 +fi
 +
 +#DEBHELPER#
 
 
 I think dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile is what you want to be
 policy compliant, but I could be wrong.

Yes this is probably a better idea. I was very happy when I managed to
write a maintainer script that solved the RC bug. But looking at the
code in the dpkg-maintscript-helper script I realize that there are
corner cases that are not properly handled by by script.

 I haven't read the full diff, so there are possibly more issues lurking
 in it.  In its current state, I am not inclined to grant an exception.
 
 ~Niels
 
 PS: urgency=high is no effect when the package is not in testing (in
 case you weren't aware of it)

I was not aware. However, the package was in testing until 2 days before
I did the upload. The fact the package was removed made the update very
urgent - and then the urgency is ignored because it was removed
Well... I don't make the rules.

I can make another update using the dpkg-maintscript-helper script
instead of my own not-so-great fix. If you truly do not want to take
advantage of the fixes for memory usage and IPv6 support I could also
upload a version where I backport the fix for the RC bug to the 5.2.5
version. But I personally think using the new version would be better.
Let me know what you think is petter.

Mattias



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8

[Niels Thykier]

On 2012-07-18 13:34, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
 [...]
 
 There are still 2 problems remaining: lestiff2 (patch in BTS) and cyrus-sasl
 (needs a sourcefull upload to fix binNMU / multiarch problem).
 

A patched version of lesstif2 appears to have been uploaded.  To my
knowledge it caused mtink to FTBFS, which has been fixed (see #683316).
  There have also been noticed issues with gromacs and cmucl, but these
appear to be unrelated to the multi-arch conversion[1].  I have CC'ed
Peter Samuelson, who have been conducting most of the lesstif2 rdep
rebuilds.

It is my understanding that lesstif2 is the last M-A conversion needed
for ia32-libs.  Assuming the changes to lesstif2 and mtink are
reasonable, cyrus-sasl just needs a no-change upload and ia32-libs is
good to go.

 [...]

 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677762
 
 The number of issues have gone down but not far enough yet. Most
 critical and trivial there is:
 
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650777
 
 That one prevents ia32-libs-gtk to be installable with a dependency on
 libgnomecanvas and 3rd party binaries still depend on that.
 
 [...]


It seems like most of those bugs are libraries needing converted to M-A
(i.e. usr/lib - usr/lib/$MADIR) and #650777 is the exception.

What do we lose if only the trivial bugs are fixed?  By trivial I
mean only patches that add Multi-Arch: $val fields like #650777 (so no
moving of libraries from usr/lib to usr/lib/$MADIR).

~Niels

[1] The gromacs issue appears to be #680825, which was filed before the
M-A conversion.  cmulc allegedly to have a broken build-arch setup;
not sure if a bug has been reported for that yet.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50179f3f.3050...@thykier.net

Bug#683299: unblock: open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3

[Julien Cristau]

Daniel,

if the git commits don't give any more detail/explanation than the
changelog, then they still don't help.  You know changelog entries and
git commit messages can be more than just one line...

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 03:30:10 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:

 From 1c91cfeedd6fc2b80050b1293e59d3dc343672eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 From: Daniel Baumann daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
 Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 02:45:02 +0200
 Subject: [PATCH 2/9] Loading modules through kmod instead of initscript.
 
 ---
  debian/local/open-vm-tools.kmod |2 ++
  debian/open-vm-tools.init   |   10 --
  debian/rules|1 +
  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 debian/local/open-vm-tools.kmod
 
This still doesn't explain why the change is necessary, and what was
wrong with the old code.  And if it is, which I would be willing to
believe if given some sort of explanation, it seems to be missing a
package dependency on kmod.

 From d1dd753db76334a896b91ac312c34470448dc252 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 From: Daniel Baumann daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
 Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 03:43:42 +0200
 Subject: [PATCH 4/9] Removing old dpkg trigger for update-initramfs.
 
... because?

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: unlock mmass*

[Filippo Rusconi]

Hello Julien,

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:11:22AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
 On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 22:52:03 +0200, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
 
  How could we manage to have that new package in Debian stable ? I
  would not mind removing from unstable the current version so that a
  new upload of version 5.1.0-2 would succeed. Or upload to another
  place ?
  
 http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#t-p-u

Thanks for suggesting this. I had done that procedure for a
release-critical bug fix, but I was skeptical about doing it for a
small improvement to the packaging of the software.

Great, I'll do that, then.

Cheers,
Filippo

-- 
Filippo Rusconi, PhD - public crypto key C78F687C @ pgp.mit.edu
Researcher at CNRS and Debian Developer lopi...@debian.org
Author of ``massXpert'' at http://www.massxpert.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120731091205.GA5856@licorne

Bug#683376: unblock: openttd/1.2.2-1 or openttd/1.2.1-2

[Matthijs Kooijman]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package openttd. Recently, upstream developers have
discovered a security problem in most versions of OpenTTD, including the
one in testing.

For squeeze/stable, a fixed package has been sent to the security team
this morning.

For testing, I intend to get the fix in through unstable (given that the
versions in testing and unstable are identical right now).

I see two options here:

 1. Include the next upstream version 1.2.2 in testing. I would prefer
this option, because:
   - 1.2.2 will include a number of useful bugfixes for users.
   - 1.2.2 will include only bugfixes, so the risk of introducing
 breakage is minimal.
   - 1.2.2 will probably be included in Ubuntu 12.10, so including it in
 Debian will allow multiplayer games between Debian wheezy and
 Ubuntu 12.10.

 Note that 1.2.2 has not been released by upstream yet, it's still
 undergoing testing.

unblock openttd/1.2.2-1

 2. Backport just the security fix and upload this as 1.2.1-2.

unblock openttd/1.2.1-2

If you think option 1 is acceptable, I'll prepare the packages as soon
as upstream releases 1.2.2. If you would rather go for option 2, I'll
start preparing packages right away.

Thanks,

Matthijs


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120731084720.16516.26085.report...@grubby.stderr.nl

Bug#683299: unblock: open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3

[Bernd Zeimetz]

[ CCing da-manager@ to make sure they know that you still fail in
maintaining your packages properly ]

Hi,

so yet again you managed to make a mess of open-vm-tools short time
before a release. open-vm-tools is essential for a lot of people,
running thousands of machines running Debian in a vmware environment -
and not in a simple desktop virtualization. So I think you should
finally pass the package into the hands of somebody who is willing to
maintain it properly and test changes early enough to ensure they make
their way into the next release. Actually I'm wondering if you even have
a proper environment to test the package properly.

On 07/31/2012 03:30 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
 On 07/31/2012 01:50 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
 there's nothing i can do about it except asking you to unblock said version, 
 which i did.
 
 almost.. in addition to what the other people on the thread[0] already
 said.. here are the individual git commits as patches attached,
 constituting the complete diff between wheezy and sid.
 
 the actual diff for anything that wasn't unblocked/freeze-exempted
 before already, is patch 8 only (and patch 9 for the changelog entry).
 
 [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg01706.html

To add some of my comments to your changelog:

+  * Switching to xz compression.

Why? Is this really release critical?

+  * Loading modules through kmod instead of initscript.

The initscript way was always ugly, but it is known to work. Why change
it short before the release? I doubt its well tested enough.

+  * Adding sleep during restart in initscript.

Why one second? Is it enough? Is there a proper way instead of sleeping?

+  * Removing old dpkg trigger for update-initramfs.

See above. How can you be sure it was well enough tested?

+  * Updating GPL boilerplate in copyright file.

Well, seems the copyright file was buggy, so yes, I guess this change
makes sense.


+  * Calling dh_dkms with version argument (Closes: #677503).
+  [ Thijs Kinkhorst ]
+  * Updating dkms.conf to make modules build again, thanks to H.A.J.
+Koster (Closes: #679886).

These two look like the only real fixes which need to be done at this
point of time before the release. Probably you should upload a package
with these three changes, send excuses for your behaviour to the release
team and ask them in a nice way to accept the changes. Of course you
should document why they are necessary and send the patches. Like
everybody else does.

If you are not willing to do so, please orphan the package so somebody
who has the time to maintain it and who is able to fix bugs during the
freeze in a manner which would be appropriate for a Debian developer
(and which is far far far away from what you are showing here).

Best regards,

Bernd

-- 
 Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485  DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5017a04d.3040...@debian.org

Bug#683376: unblock: openttd/1.2.2-1 or openttd/1.2.1-2

[Niels Thykier]

tags 683376 + moreinfo
thanks

On 2012-07-31 10:47, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
 Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
 release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock
 
 Please unblock package openttd. Recently, upstream developers have 
 discovered a security problem in most versions of OpenTTD,
 including the one in testing.
 
 For squeeze/stable, a fixed package has been sent to the security
 team this morning.
 
 For testing, I intend to get the fix in through unstable (given
 that the versions in testing and unstable are identical right
 now).
 
 I see two options here:
 
 [...]
 
 If you think option 1 is acceptable, I'll prepare the packages as
 soon as upstream releases 1.2.2. If you would rather go for option
 2, I'll start preparing packages right away.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Matthijs
 
 

Hi,

 We cannot really make this decision without knowing what we are
looking at.
  Please include a debdiff for each option showing the differences
between the version in testing and the version that option would provide.

~Niels


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5017a302.6070...@thykier.net

Processed: Re: Bug#683376: unblock: openttd/1.2.2-1 or openttd/1.2.1-2

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 683376 + moreinfo
Bug #683376 [release.debian.org] unblock: openttd/1.2.2-1 or openttd/1.2.1-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
683376: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683376
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13437263554078.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#683377: unblock: xen/4.1.3~rc1+hg-20120614.a9c0a89c08f2-5

[Bastian Blank]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock xen/4.1.3~rc1+hg-20120614.a9c0a89c08f2-5. It makes it
possible to do real upgrades and fixes some other problems.

xen (4.1.3~rc1+hg-20120614.a9c0a89c08f2-5) unstable; urgency=low

  [ Ian Campbell ]
  * Set tap device MAC addresses to fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff (Closes: #671018)
  * Only run xendomains initscript if toolstack is xl or xm (Closes: #680528)

  [ Bastian Blank ]
  * Actually build-depend on new enough version of dpkg-dev.
  * Add xen-sytem-* meta-packages. We are finally in a position to do
automatic upgrades and this package is missing. (closes: #681376)

 -- Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org  Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:23:26 +0200

unblock xen/4.1.3~rc1+hg-20120614.a9c0a89c08f2-5

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.4-trunk-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120731093405.28852.74259.report...@minihammer.waldi.eu.org

Re: unlock mmass*

[Filippo Rusconi]

Greetings Debian release Managers,

following my previous mails about mmass [0], I would like to perform
an upload of version 5.1.0-2 (currently in testing is version
5.1.0-1).

The debdiff is the following:

debdiff mmass_5.1.0-1.dsc mmass_5.1.0-2.dsc 
diff -Nru mmass-5.1.0/debian/changelog mmass-5.1.0/debian/changelog
--- mmass-5.1.0/debian/changelog2012-05-24 15:09:18.0 +0200
+++ mmass-5.1.0/debian/changelog2012-07-31 11:20:18.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+mmass (5.1.0-2) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+  * Fix the debian/start-script so as to pass the argument to the mmass
+program. This is important because otherwise it cannot be possible to
+run the mmass program with a file name to load at start.
+
+ -- Filippo Rusconi lopi...@debian.org  Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:42:43 +0200
+
 mmass (5.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release implementing, amongst others, a suggestion that I
diff -Nru mmass-5.1.0/debian/start-script mmass-5.1.0/debian/start-script
--- mmass-5.1.0/debian/start-script 2012-05-24 15:09:18.0 +0200
+++ mmass-5.1.0/debian/start-script 2012-07-31 11:20:18.0 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 #!/bin/sh
 
 export PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/mmass/mspy/${PYTHONPATH:+:$PYTHONPATH}
-exec python /usr/share/mmass/mmass.py
+exec python /usr/share/mmass/mmass.py $@

Could you please authorize me to upload that new package to
testing-proposed-updates ?

Thank you for your kind attention,

Cheers,
Filippo

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg01463.html

-- 
Filippo Rusconi, PhD - public crypto key C78F687C @ pgp.mit.edu
Researcher at CNRS and Debian Developer lopi...@debian.org
Author of ``massXpert'' at http://www.massxpert.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#683376: unblock: openttd/1.2.2-1 or openttd/1.2.1-2

[Matthijs Kooijman]

Hi Niels,

  We cannot really make this decision without knowing what we are
 looking at.
   Please include a debdiff for each option showing the differences
 between the version in testing and the version that option would provide.
Ok, I'll do so as soon as upstream releases the 1.2.2 RC1, which should
be identical or at least very similar to the final 1.2.2 release.

Thanks for looking  into this!

Gr.

Matthijs


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#683315: unblock: yagf/0.9.1-3

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

 We can't unblock something that hasn't been upload yet...

Sponsor has uploaded the package.

Regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/497951343728...@web27f.yandex.ru

Re: gscan2pdf freeze exception

[Jeffrey Ratcliffe]

On 29 July 2012 12:57, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
 According to the BTS, #682818 also affects the version in testing.  If
 so, could you please wait till 1.0.4-4 has migrated.  This makes the
 diff much easier for me to review.

Would you also unfreeze uploads which fix important bugs (I'm looking
at 680158[1])?

Regards

Jeff

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680158


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cacg2wbz_quec4vwd+bcn40jkjdvvgqmxxunu0gdnsur5wt+...@mail.gmail.com

Re: gscan2pdf freeze exception

[Niels Thykier]

On 2012-07-31 12:08, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
 On 29 July 2012 12:57, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
 According to the BTS, #682818 also affects the version in testing.  If
 so, could you please wait till 1.0.4-4 has migrated.  This makes the
 diff much easier for me to review.
 
 Would you also unfreeze uploads which fix important bugs (I'm looking
 at 680158[1])?
 
 Regards
 
 Jeff
 
 [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680158
 
 


fixes for severity: important bugs in packages of priority: optional or
extra, only when this can be done via unstable;

 Source: http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html

So, in the particular case, yes.

Can I ask you to file an unblock bug for that (with a debdiff)?  Unblock
requests on d-release@l.d.o are harder for us to keep track of.

~Niels


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5017bd5c.6060...@thykier.net

Bug#683383: unblock: boxshade/3.3.1-7

[Andreas Tille]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package boxshade because RC bug #683375 was fixed.
Please see debdiff below to see the changes.

unblock boxshade/3.3.1-7

Kind regards and thanks for your work as release team

  Andreas.


diff -Nru boxshade-3.3.1/debian/changelog boxshade-3.3.1/debian/changelog
--- boxshade-3.3.1/debian/changelog 2012-01-07 09:14:53.0 +0100
+++ boxshade-3.3.1/debian/changelog 2012-07-31 11:25:01.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+boxshade (3.3.1-7) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * debian/install: Make sure boxshade executable will be installed
+in the proper location
+Closes: #683375 (LP: #1017188)
+
+ -- Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org  Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:17:22 +0200
+
 boxshade (3.3.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Mathieu Malaterre ]
diff -Nru boxshade-3.3.1/debian/install boxshade-3.3.1/debian/install
--- boxshade-3.3.1/debian/install   2012-01-07 09:07:52.0 +0100
+++ boxshade-3.3.1/debian/install   2012-07-31 11:18:41.0 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 debian/bin usr
-boxshade   usr/lib
+boxshade   usr/lib/boxshade
 *.grp  etc/boxshade
 *.par  etc/boxshade
 *.sim  etc/boxshade

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.5
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-xenU-4814-i386 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/2012073511.2288.32545.report...@mail.an3as.eu

Bug#683387: unblock: transmission/2.52-3

[Leo 'costela' Antunes]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package transmission

Latest upload has a backported fix for a security vulnerability[0]

Cheers

[0] http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2012/Jul/348

unblock transmission/2.52-3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.4-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120731115219.29864.91203.reportbug@inertia.local

Bug#683243: unblock: keystone/2012.1.1-2

[Thomas Goirand]

On 07/31/2012 04:20 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
 tags 683243 + moreinfo
 thanks
 
 On 2012-07-30 07:19, Thomas Goirand wrote:
 Package: release.debian.org
 Severity: normal
 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
 Usertags: unblock

 Dear Release Team,

 The new Keystone package, currently available in SID, contains
 reviewed Debconf templates and lots of translations, thanks to
 the work of Bubulle.

 Please unblock keystone/2012.1.1-2.

 Thanks in advance,

 Thomas Goirand (zigo)


 
 Hi,
 
 It seems like the new version introduces #683337?
 
 ~Niels

Hi,

Indeed, this needs to be fixed, we're working on it and I'll update
#683337 accordingly. I don't think that this version introduces it
though, I believe it was there already.

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5017c8ac.8050...@debian.org

Bug#683315: marked as done (unblock: yagf/0.9.1-3)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:59:18 +0100
with message-id dc8953297b8bad895a684aa4cc883...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683315: unblock: yagf/0.9.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #683315,
regarding unblock: yagf/0.9.1-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
683315: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683315
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: jac...@debian.org

Please unblock package yagf

Fixes not RC bug #682102

unblock yagf/0.9.1-3
diff -Nru yagf-0.9.1/debian/changelog yagf-0.9.1/debian/changelog
--- yagf-0.9.1/debian/changelog 2012-06-10 15:47:59.0 +0300
+++ yagf-0.9.1/debian/changelog 2012-07-30 19:52:17.0 +0300
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+yagf (0.9.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * debian/control was updated:
+changed dependency of yagf package from cuneiform | tesseract-ocr to
+tesseract-ocr | cuneiform. (Closes: #682102)
+
+ -- Boris Pek tehnic...@mail.ru  Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:51:55 +0300
+
 yagf (0.9.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/rules was updated:
diff -Nru yagf-0.9.1/debian/control yagf-0.9.1/debian/control
--- yagf-0.9.1/debian/control   2012-06-10 15:47:42.0 +0300
+++ yagf-0.9.1/debian/control   2012-07-30 19:52:17.0 +0300
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 Package: yagf
 Architecture: any
 Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends},
- cuneiform | tesseract-ocr
+ tesseract-ocr | cuneiform
 Recommends: xsane
 Description: graphical interface for cuneiform and tesseract
  YAGF is a graphical interface for cuneiform and tesseract text recognition
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---

On 31.07.2012 10:56, Boris Pek wrote:

Hi,


We can't unblock something that hasn't been upload yet...


Sponsor has uploaded the package.


Unblocked; thanks.

Regards,

Adam---End Message---

Bug#683383: marked as done (unblock: boxshade/3.3.1-7)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:01:13 +0100
with message-id 5ecde0164d1bff7ab8388b51f4938...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683383: unblock: boxshade/3.3.1-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #683383,
regarding unblock: boxshade/3.3.1-7
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
683383: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683383
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package boxshade because RC bug #683375 was fixed.
Please see debdiff below to see the changes.

unblock boxshade/3.3.1-7

Kind regards and thanks for your work as release team

  Andreas.


diff -Nru boxshade-3.3.1/debian/changelog boxshade-3.3.1/debian/changelog
--- boxshade-3.3.1/debian/changelog 2012-01-07 09:14:53.0 +0100
+++ boxshade-3.3.1/debian/changelog 2012-07-31 11:25:01.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+boxshade (3.3.1-7) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * debian/install: Make sure boxshade executable will be installed
+in the proper location
+Closes: #683375 (LP: #1017188)
+
+ -- Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org  Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:17:22 +0200
+
 boxshade (3.3.1-6) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Mathieu Malaterre ]
diff -Nru boxshade-3.3.1/debian/install boxshade-3.3.1/debian/install
--- boxshade-3.3.1/debian/install   2012-01-07 09:07:52.0 +0100
+++ boxshade-3.3.1/debian/install   2012-07-31 11:18:41.0 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 debian/bin usr
-boxshade   usr/lib
+boxshade   usr/lib/boxshade
 *.grp  etc/boxshade
 *.par  etc/boxshade
 *.sim  etc/boxshade

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.5
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-xenU-4814-i386 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---

On 31.07.2012 12:15, Andreas Tille wrote:

Please unblock package boxshade because RC bug #683375 was fixed.


Unblocked; thanks.

Regards,

Adam---End Message---

Advise on next steps concerning upload and unblock request

[Thomas Müller]

Hi,

I'm one of the maintainers of the ownCloud package [1].

We have ownCloud 4.0.4 in testing and 4.0.5 (which fixes RC #681138) in 
unstable.
Just a few minutes ago upstream released 4.0.6 with fixes to some security 
issues (besides other fixes).

Shall I ask for unblock of 4.0.5 and a few days later for 4.0.6?
Or can we agree to got for 4.0.6 right away.

I think we have to go for 4.0.6 as I'll classify the security issues as RC.

Please find the upstream changelog here: http://owncloud.org/releases/Changelog

Upstream diff v4.0.4..v4.0.5:
https://gitorious.org/owncloud/owncloud/commit/d163fe02cd05c30a223c757b138acd8a35f898f3/diffs/10bf36a6ae022f54797d12ab756ad78e4a9ffe5a

Upstream diff v4.0.5..v4.0.6:
https://gitorious.org/owncloud/owncloud/commit/10bf36a6ae022f54797d12ab756ad78e4a9ffe5a/diffs/aa60771736b230d82d472a3443f262f7158842ad

Thanks a lot and take care,

Thomas

[1] - http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/owncloud.html


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1343734065.5017c13176...@office.tmit.eu

Bug#683387: marked as done (unblock: transmission/2.52-3)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:03:18 +0100
with message-id ae033b99c4589824720c50f227da6...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683387: unblock: transmission/2.52-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #683387,
regarding unblock: transmission/2.52-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
683387: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683387
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package transmission

Latest upload has a backported fix for a security vulnerability[0]

Cheers

[0] http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2012/Jul/348

unblock transmission/2.52-3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.4-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---

On 31.07.2012 12:52, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:

Please unblock package transmission

Latest upload has a backported fix for a security vulnerability[0]


Unblocked; thanks.

Regards,

Adam---End Message---

Re: debdiff for automake1.7_1.7.9-9.1+squeeze1

[Adam D. Barratt]

On 31.07.2012 04:40, Eric Dorland wrote:

Proposed stable update for automake1.7.


Please go ahead; thanks.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/3f4e18fa00e6e0ac612be71262cc7...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org

Re: debdiff for automake1.9_1.9.6+nogfdl-3.1+squeeze1

[Adam D. Barratt]

On 31.07.2012 04:12, Eric Dorland wrote:

* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote:

On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 23:24 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
 Proposed stable update for automake1.9.

This looks like the patches that are already in stable?

+automake1.9 (1.9.6+nogfdl-3.1) unstable; urgency=high


Err whoops, attached the wrong diff. Here's the right one.


Thanks.  Please go ahead.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/2d9847362cc29eefc7595b912a215...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org

Bug#683392: unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx/96.43.20-6

[Andreas Beckmann]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx

Only translation and documentation updates.

  debdiff --diffstat ...-5.dsc ...-6.dsc | filterdiff -x '*.po*'

attached.

unblock nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx/96.43.20-6

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (800, 'stable'), (700, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (500, 
'stable-updates'), (130, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diffstat for nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx-96.43.20 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx-96.43.20

 NEWS|   19 ++-
 changelog   |   29 ++---
 control |   39 +--
 control.models  |5 +-
 po/cs.po|   52 ++
 po/da.po|   53 +++
 po/de.po|   60 +++
 po/fr.po|   61 
 po/it.po|   52 ++
 po/pl.po|   58 ++
 po/ru.po|   55 
 po/sk.po|   52 ++
 po/sv.po|   54 +++
 po/templates.pot|   45 ++
 rules   |2 -
 xserver-xorg-video-nvidia.templates |   18 +-
 16 files changed, 612 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff -Nru nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx-96.43.20/debian/NEWS nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx-96.43.20/debian/NEWS
--- nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx-96.43.20/debian/NEWS	2012-06-30 12:13:40.0 +0200
+++ nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx-96.43.20/debian/NEWS	2012-07-12 08:15:15.0 +0200
@@ -1,13 +1,16 @@
 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx (96.43.20-5) unstable; urgency=low
 
-  The NVIDIA legacy 96xx driver has not been updated to support the current
-  Xserver and is therefore no longer usable.  For graphics adapters that are
-  not supported by a newer nvidia driver generation the only possibility is to
-  use the nouveau driver.
+  Nvidia Corporation has not updated the legacy 96xx driver to support 
+  current X servers, so this driver is no longer usable.  For graphics
+  adapters that are not supported by a newer Nvidia driver generation,
+  the best option is to use the free Nouveau driver.
 
-  In order to switch to the nouveau driver, please uninstall all nvidia
-  driver packages and *purge* (just removing is insufficient) the
-  nvidia-kernel-common package.  Also remove all nvidia specific configuration
-  from /etc/X11/xorg.conf (and xorg.conf.d/).
+  To switch to the Nouveau driver, please uninstall all Nvidia driver
+  packages, remove all Nvidia-specific configuration from
+  /etc/X11/xorg.conf (and xorg.conf.d/), and *purge* the
+  nvidia-kernel-common package - just removing it is insufficient.
+
+  The Nouveau driver (xserver-xorg-video-nouveau) should work without
+  needing any specific xorg.conf settings.
 
  -- Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de  Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:36:17 +0200
diff -Nru nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx-96.43.20/debian/changelog nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx-96.43.20/debian/changelog
--- nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx-96.43.20/debian/changelog	2012-06-30 13:11:06.0 +0200
+++ nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx-96.43.20/debian/changelog	2012-07-31 13:15:41.0 +0200
@@ -1,14 +1,33 @@
+nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx (96.43.20-6) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  [ Andreas Beckmann ]
+  * Debconf template reviewed by debian-l10n-english@.
+  * Update NEWS and long descriptions accordingly.
+
+  [ Debconf translations ]
+  * Czech (cs): Michal Simunek  (Closes: #683066)
+  * Danish (da): Joe Hansen (Closes: #682382)
+  * French (fr): Julien Patriarca   (Closes: #682499)
+  * German (de): Martin Eberhard Schauer(Closes: #682855)
+  * Italian (it): Dario Santamaria  (Closes: #683118)
+  * Polish (pl): Michał Kułach  (Closes: #682325)
+  * Russian (ru): Yuri Kozlov   (Closes: #682130)
+  * Slovak (sk): Ivan Masár (Closes: #682009)
+  * Swedish (sv): Martin Bagge  (Closes: #682568)
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de  Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:15:41 +0200
+
 nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx (96.43.20-5) unstable; urgency=low
 
-  * Turn into transitional packages.  The 96xx legacy driver has 

Bug#683299: unblock: open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3

[Daniel Baumann]

On 07/31/2012 11:07 AM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
 so yet again you managed to make a mess of open-vm-tools short time
 before a release.

i didn't. please read the whole thread carefully, thank you.

 +  * Switching to xz compression.
 
 Why?

smaller package size.

 Is this really release critical?

this is part of the -2 upload before the freeze (as everything else
except the last dkms ftbfs fix), it's a regular maintainer upload.

 +  * Loading modules through kmod instead of initscript.
 
 The initscript way was always ugly, but it is known to work. Why change
 it short before the release?

because it's better and less error prone.

 I doubt its well tested enough.

it is.

 +  * Adding sleep during restart in initscript.
 
 Why one second?

because it sometimes fails to restart if there's no sleep.

 Is it enough?

yes.

 Is there a proper way instead of sleeping?

to the best of my knowledge, this is the proper way these days on how do
deal with these sort of things in sysvinit initscripts.

 +  * Removing old dpkg trigger for update-initramfs.
 
 See above. How can you be sure it was well enough tested?

dpkg dropped support for update-initramfs triggers in debian/*triggers,
the trigger file therefore is entirely useless. you need to call
update-initramfs in postinst manually, like the package already does
since a long time.

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:  daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:   http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5017d0c3.4060...@progress-technologies.net

Bug#683299: unblock: open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3

[Bernd Zeimetz]

On 07/31/2012 02:34 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
 On 07/31/2012 11:07 AM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
 so yet again you managed to make a mess of open-vm-tools short time
 before a release.
 
 i didn't. please read the whole thread carefully, thank you.

Yes you did, as several people tried to explain to you already. But I'm
not going to bother myself with that anymore, assuming that you will
manage to do an upload according to the rules of the release team asap.

-- 
 Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485  DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5017d4db.9070...@debian.org

Bug#683400: freeze-exception for live-debconfig

[Daniel Baumann]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

On 07/31/2012 02:51 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
 I checked with Release Team, and they prefer to have written
 communication for upload approvals, so they asked if you could send a
 request to debian-release@lists.d.o anyway.

done hereby (not sure if opening a freeze-exception bug is that accurate
for this sort of request, but i didn't found anything more suitable, and
bts is preferable over plain mails on the list).

live-debconfig contains the stand-alone parts from live-config that's
needed for 'build-time' configuration of systems, including live systems
and lxc systems.

it was split out from live-config due to popular demand, see ftp-masters
thread for the history why it was in src:live-config in the first place
rather than it's own src package (beginning of june).

live-debconfig however is in NEW now since some days, and i need to know
if ftp-masters will process the package so that it can go to unstable
first, and eventually and if RM agrees, go to wheezy. if not, i will
need to stuff the contend back into src:live-config.

ftp-masters however say, that they need RM consent to even let it to
unstable first (which actually confuses me a bit, since other completely
new packages, e.g. crtools, were processed just fine and are now in
unstable).

at debconf, luk said that he agrees to have the package in unstable
first, and then go from there and see, if it can go to wheezy at a later
point (which is ok, since we'll need a few
translation/documentation-update uploads of that package anyway before
we consider asking for an unblock).

so.. does the release-team allow ftp-master to process that package?

unrelated to that, but similar: we'll intend to upload another new
package, live-examples, that will carry the configuration trees for
live-build for the official debian-live images for wheezy (see e.g.
http://live.debian.net/gitweb/?p=config-gnome-desktop.git). do you
need/want a seperate request for that too in order to allow ftp-masters
to process the package (in advance, or afterwards?), or should i just
upload the package normally?

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:  daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:   http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5017d9b5.90...@progress-technologies.net

Bug#683299: unblock: open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3

[Daniel Baumann]

On 07/31/2012 10:59 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
 This still doesn't explain why the change is necessary, and what was
 wrong with the old code.  And if it is, which I would be willing to
 believe if given some sort of explanation, it seems to be missing a
 package dependency on kmod.

for the 'why' part i've think i covered in my response to Bernd a few
minutes ago, if you need more, feel free to ask.

regarding the kmod depends.. kmod is like linux kernel packages, there
should be no depends against it as it will otherwise mean that kmod
(which is quasi-essential, it's being pulled in during debootstrap)
would be hard-enforced upon chroots and lxc systems, where you don't or
can't use kernel modules anyway (within the chroot/container). having
said that, kmod should be in recommends.

do you want me to upload that right now already, or would you prefere
waiting until (if at all) open-vm-tools migrate?

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:  daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:   http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5017df94.6020...@progress-technologies.net

Bug#683299: unblock: open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3

[Julien Cristau]

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 14:34:11 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:

  +  * Adding sleep during restart in initscript.
  
  Why one second?
 
 because it sometimes fails to restart if there's no sleep.
 
  Is it enough?
 
 yes.
 
Based on what?  If the system is under load, what guarantees that it
won't take more time?

  Is there a proper way instead of sleeping?
 
 to the best of my knowledge, this is the proper way these days on how do
 deal with these sort of things in sysvinit initscripts.
 
Nope.  The proper way is for stop to not return until it's actually
stopped.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#683299: unblock: open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3

[Julien Cristau]

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 14:34:11 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:

  +  * Switching to xz compression.
  
  Why?
 
 smaller package size.
 
Which is particularly important for this package because...?  And using
the -9 option (which is recommended against by the xz documentation)
because...?

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#683299: unblock: open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3

[Daniel Baumann]

On 07/31/2012 03:40 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
 Based on what?

tests on my computer.

 If the system is under load, what guarantees that it won't take
 more time?

as often there are no guarantees, but i tested it under quite some cpu
and IO load, and it worked for me.

regarding testing migration.. even if it wouldn't help in 100% of all
cases, it's better to have it safer in most cases, the current testing
package does not have a sleep at all.

 Nope.  The proper way is for stop to not return until it's
 actually stopped.

it does that. but again, it's safer in some cases to have the sleep,
just to be on the safe side.

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:  daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:   http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5017e18c.1030...@progress-technologies.net

Bug#683299: unblock: open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3

[Daniel Baumann]

On 07/31/2012 03:41 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
 Which is particularly important for this package because...?  And using
 the -9 option (which is recommended against by the xz documentation)
 because...?

i'm definitely not going to re-iterate what all the people said about
using xz compression, feel free to watch the debconf talk and look at
the various threads on the debian mailinglists should you require more
information why and how it's beneficial to use xz in debian.

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:  daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:   http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5017e1fe.3060...@progress-technologies.net

Bug#683334: unblock: libcrypt-ssleay-perl/0.58-2 (pre-approval request)

[Philipp Kern]

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:47:49PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
 Note, I just first would like to get a pre-approval, if the change is
 okay to be passed to wheezy.
 
 Attached is the debdiff against 0.58-1 currently in wheezy and
 unstable.

ACK.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#683342: unblock: e2fsprogs/1.42.5-1

[Theodore Ts'o]

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:28:54AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
 Also (in answer to your other email), I believe it is fine with
 requesting them already now so we are aware of them.  :)

Since udeb's have been held, I guess this point is moot in any case.  :-)

Just for the record, none of these changes should be user visible from
a d-i perspective, although of course any change has testing
impliciations.

 Anyhow, I gave it a short look and...
  * All debian patches appear to have been removed.  By the looks they
were fetched from upstream so I guess they were backports that are
no longer needed?  (I am asking because there is no mention of them
in d/changelog as far as I can tell)

Well, technically speaking they came from upstream first (e2fsprogs
gets developed with an upstream-first policy), and then I pull them
into debian/patches when I make interim releases of the debian package
between upstream releases.  So yes, all of these commits are reflected
upstream.

(Each of the debian patches references the upstream commit id's for
easier tracking, BTW.)

  * Did you intend to include tune2fs.8.in.bak e2fsck.8.in.bak?

Argh, no, I didn't.  Thanks for pointing that out.  Unfortunately,
it's in the upstream release tarball which has already been published
and GPG signed, so it's too late to fix this now.

My script for generating the release tarball needs some tweaking so
that these files (left over from a patch application) get filtered out
automatically.  I have a .gitignore entry which is why I didn't notice
them, sigh.

- Ted


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120731164010.gb32...@thunk.org

Bug#682482: unblock: glpi/0.83.31-1

[Pierre Chifflier]

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 02:49:50PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
 On 2012-07-23 10:56, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
  Package: release.debian.org
  Severity: normal
  User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
  Usertags: unblock
  
  Hi,
  
  GLPI 0.83.31 (micro-fix based on 0.83.3) is an important security
  release, fixing two CVEs:
  
  CVE-2012-4002:
Bug #3704: CSRF prevention step 1
Bug #3707: CSRF prevention step 2
  
  CVE-2012-4003:
Bug #3705: Security XSS for few items
  
  https://forge.indepnet.net/projects/glpi/versions/771
  
  Note: the diff from 0.83.2-1 (current testing) is pretty big, but almost
  all the patch is made of fixes in many files. Trying to backport would
  make no sense imho since it would bring almost everything, and make future
  maintenance even harder.
  
  Please allow GLPI 0.83.31 in testing.
  
  Regards,
  Pierre
  
  unblock glpi/0.83.31-1
  
  
 
 Hi,
 
 I am afraid that diff is too much for me to review.  I have tried a
 couple of times now and there is lot in there I expect is unrelated
 changes.
 
 I understand that due to #3707, the security fix only will still be a
 huge diff.  That said, it is not the Html::closeForm() (i.e. CSRF step
 2) that I choke on.  So I would be would be interested in seening the
 diff with only the security fixes.
 
 ~Niels
 
 

Hi,

I agree that the diff is pretty big, and that splitting only the
security fixes is hard (and would make maintenance almost impossible).

I used a few commands to extract a trimmed version of the patch:

git df upstream/0.83.2..upstream/0.83.31  glpi_0.83.31_raw.diff
cat glpi_0.83.31_raw.diff | filterdiff -x '*locales*' -x '*htmlawed*' \
 -x '*glpi-0.83.1-empty.sql*' -x '*update*'  glpi_0.83.31_filtered.diff

to exclude the changes related to locales and similar. I did not attach
the patch to this mail, it is still 200kB.

The stripped diff still makes 5300 lines out of the ~9000 original. It
also appears that it does not only include calls to
Html::closeForm()

but also checks on HTTP_REFERRER (and exemption on some pages with
DO_NOT_CHECK_HTTP_REFERER), and addition of CURRENTCSRFTOKEN.

I know that there are rules for the freeze, but I do not feel many
choices here:
- keep a vulnerable version for wheezy. Not good. I may try to maintain
  something in -backports, but that would still mean having a vulnerable
  version by default.
- try to backport only the security corrections in the current version
  in testing. Honestly, I do not think I will be able to do that, so if
  this is decided I will ask for some help.

Additionally, since the submission of this ticket,
version 0.83.4 was released with some new fixes (not tagged as
security, but #3800 also concerns HTTP_REFERER for ex.).

Regards,
Pierre


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120731180808.gf14...@mail.wzdftpd.net

Bug#683334: unblock: libcrypt-ssleay-perl/0.58-2 (pre-approval request)

[Salvatore Bonaccorso]

Hi Philipp

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 05:15:10PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
 On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:47:49PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
  Note, I just first would like to get a pre-approval, if the change is
  okay to be passed to wheezy.
  
  Attached is the debdiff against 0.58-1 currently in wheezy and
  unstable.
 
 ACK.

Great, many thanks! I would like to delay the upload to unstable just
a bit, to first answer to a concern raised in #622917 in message 41[1]
by Jakub Wilk. I would like to first have a look at this, before
uploading to unstable.

 [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622917#41

Will try to do so later in the evening.

Kind regards
Salvatore


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#683392: unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx/96.43.20-6

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 14:25 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
 Please unblock package nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx
 
 Only translation and documentation updates.

I debated grumbling about the changes to -5's existing changelog, but I
guess the meaning hasn't changed.

This change to debian/rules doesn't appear to have been mentioned in the
changelog:

 override_dh_makeshlibs:
-   dh_makeshlibs -Xvdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so -Xtls/libnvidia-tls.so -- -c0
+   DPKG_GENSYMBOLS_CHECK_LEVEL=0 dh_makeshlibs -Xvdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so 
-Xtls/libnvidia-tls.so -- -c0

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1343759589.1551.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org

Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8

[Nicholas Breen]

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:02:55AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
 A patched version of lesstif2 appears to have been uploaded.  To my
 knowledge it caused mtink to FTBFS, which has been fixed (see #683316).
   There have also been noticed issues with gromacs and cmucl, but these
 appear to be unrelated to the multi-arch conversion[1].
[...]
 [1] The gromacs issue appears to be #680825, which was filed before the
 M-A conversion.

Yes, it is.  gromacs builds correctly with the multiarch lesstif2 as long as
cmake is downgraded to 2.8.8-3, which avoids #680825/#681428.  That bug is
waiting on a new cmake upload -- would it be acceptable to the RT to remove
gromacs from testing, allowing lesstif2 to migrate, and then re-admitting a
binNMU'ed gromacs after cmake is updated?  Assuming the lesstif and
(as-yet-unavailable) cmake migrations themselves are allowed, of course.


-- 
Nicholas Breen
nbr...@debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120731185914.gj9...@ofb.net

Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#679671: ia32-libs-i386: depends on removed package libdb4.8

[Peter Samuelson]

[Nicholas Breen]
 That bug is waiting on a new cmake upload -- would it be acceptable
 to the RT to remove gromacs from testing, allowing lesstif2 to
 migrate, and then re-admitting a binNMU'ed gromacs after cmake is
 updated?  Assuming the lesstif and (as-yet-unavailable) cmake
 migrations themselves are allowed, of course.

There is no need to remove gromacs in order for lesstif2 to migrate.
There's no SONAME bump or anything.  The issue only came up at all,
because we needed to make sure the new lesstif2 does not add any new
FTBFS in other packages.

Peter


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120731194557.ge4...@p12n.org

Bug#683436: unblock: aroarfw/0.1~beta4-5

[Patrick Matthäi]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package aroarfw

This update only removes Philipp from the maintainer list, as he had already
requested.

unblock aroarfw/0.1~beta4-5

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120731200229.4289.50091.report...@srv1.linux-dev.org

Bug#683437: unblock: ckport/0.1~rc0-3

[Patrick Matthäi]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package ckport

This update only removes Philipp from the maintainers list, as he had already
requested, to do so.

unblock ckport/0.1~rc0-3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120731200338.4350.77832.report...@srv1.linux-dev.org

Bug#683440: unblock: muroard/0.1.10-2

[Patrick Matthäi]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package muroard

This update removes Philipp - as requested - as maintainer.

unblock muroard/0.1.10-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120731200633.4464.60338.report...@srv1.linux-dev.org

Bug#683439: unblock: muroar/0.1.8-2

[Patrick Matthäi]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package muroar

It removes - as requested - Philipp as maintainer and also adds an important
upstream patch (01-env-home-validation) to add validation of $HOME.

unblock muroar/0.1.8-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120731200534.4400.19671.report...@srv1.linux-dev.org

Bug#683441: unblock: otrs2/3.1.7+dfsg1-3

[Patrick Matthäi]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package otrs2

I have added an upstream patch to fix the postmaster module with IMAPTLS
mailboxes:

* Add backported upstream patch 27-imaptls-more-than-one-email. Using IMAPTLS
  will purge all e-mails, if more than one is located in the inbox. This is
  because of newer Mail::IMAPClient module versions return an array reference
  insteaf of an array on the -message action.

unblock otrs2/3.1.7+dfsg1-3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120731200809.4519.4688.report...@srv1.linux-dev.org

Bug#683436: marked as done (unblock: aroarfw/0.1~beta4-5)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:07:05 +0100
with message-id 1343765225.1551.4.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683436: unblock: aroarfw/0.1~beta4-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #683436,
regarding unblock: aroarfw/0.1~beta4-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
683436: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683436
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package aroarfw

This update only removes Philipp from the maintainer list, as he had already
requested.

unblock aroarfw/0.1~beta4-5

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 22:02 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
 Please unblock package aroarfw
 
 This update only removes Philipp from the maintainer list, as he had already
 requested.

Unblocked.

Regards,

Adam---End Message---

Bug#683442: unblock: fglrx-driver/1:12-6+point-1

[Patrick Matthäi]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package fglrx-driver

As already discussed in:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg01145.html
fglrx-driver could be unblocked now. AMD just released a point release for
Debian to fix the open issues.

unblock fglrx-driver/1:12-6+point-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120731201254.4585.91024.report...@srv1.linux-dev.org

Bug#683437: marked as done (unblock: ckport/0.1~rc0-3)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:12:02 +0100
with message-id 1343765522.1551.6.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683437: unblock: ckport/0.1~rc0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #683437,
regarding unblock: ckport/0.1~rc0-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
683437: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683437
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package ckport

This update only removes Philipp from the maintainers list, as he had already
requested, to do so.

unblock ckport/0.1~rc0-3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 22:03 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
 Please unblock package ckport
 
 This update only removes Philipp from the maintainers list, as he had already
 requested, to do so.

Unblocked.

Regards,

Adam---End Message---

Bug#683440: marked as done (unblock: muroard/0.1.10-2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:11:16 +0100
with message-id 1343765476.1551.5.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683440: unblock: muroard/0.1.10-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #683440,
regarding unblock: muroard/0.1.10-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
683440: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683440
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package muroard

This update removes Philipp - as requested - as maintainer.

unblock muroard/0.1.10-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 22:06 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
 Please unblock package muroard
 
 This update removes Philipp - as requested - as maintainer.

Unblocked.

Regards,

Adam---End Message---

Bug#683392: unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx/96.43.20-6

[Andreas Beckmann]

On 2012-07-31 20:33, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
  override_dh_makeshlibs:
 -   dh_makeshlibs -Xvdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so -Xtls/libnvidia-tls.so -- -c0
 +   DPKG_GENSYMBOLS_CHECK_LEVEL=0 dh_makeshlibs 
 -Xvdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so -Xtls/libnvidia-tls.so -- -c0

Most packages are empty transitionals now after commenting out the files
in .install, but I didn't delete the .symbols - and -c0 wasn't enough to
silence dh_makeshlibs w.r.t. missing symbols (because my .pbuilderrc
sets DPKG_GENSYMBOLS_CHECK_LEVEL=4).


Andreas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50183bb3.3070...@abeckmann.de

Bug#683445: Consider including GMSH into Wheezy

[Anton Gladky]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please, consider including GMSH into Wheezy.
GMSH is a mesh generator, which is used for preparation of
meshes for different simulation and modelling tasks.

Unfortunately it is affected by a license issue because of opencascade
license GPL-incompatibility #617931, like some other packages,
which are still in Wheezy.

But the license question has a chance to be some day resolved.
It will be pity, if the next stable release will loose such important
for scientists and engineers package.

Thanks.

Anton


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CALF6qJnj6OO1ctDZUvPaR9_vVmHXbY0FfQW6+q=nzuxta8h...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#683446: unblock: libqt4pas/2.5-7

[Matthias Klumpp]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package libqt4pas

Rev7 only contains adjustments on the package's symbols file to build on more
(now all) architectures. It does not introduce any new issue and is therefore
safe to accept for Wheezy.

unblock libqt4pas/2.5-7

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.5.0-6-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120731204535.31672.16873.reportbug@sirius

Bug#683446: unblock: libqt4pas/2.5-7

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 22:45 +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
 Please unblock package libqt4pas
 
 Rev7 only contains adjustments on the package's symbols file to build on more
 (now all) architectures.

From a scan of the diff, all of the changes appear to be hurd-i386
related?  Given that wheezy won't include any packages on that
architecture, such changes aren't suitable for an unblock.

 It does not introduce any new issue and is therefore
 safe to accept for Wheezy.

Non-sequitur.  The freeze policy doesn't consist of does not introduce
any new issue.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1343768563.1551.10.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org

Re: debdiff for automake1.10_1.10.3-1+squeeze1

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 19:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
 On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 22:24 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
  Proposed stable update for automake1.10.
 
 +automake1.10 (1:1.10.3-1+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
 +
 +  * lib/am/distdir.am: Backport fix for CVE-2012-3386 Temporary worldwide
 +write permissions during make distcheck. (Closes: #681117)
 +
 + -- Eric Dorland e...@debian.org  Sun, 29 Jul 2012 21:22:49 -0400
 
 Please go ahead; thanks.

For the record, this was uploaded and I've just flagged it for
acceptance in to p-u.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1343768894.1551.11.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org

Bug#683446: marked as done (unblock: libqt4pas/2.5-7)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:08:15 +0200
with message-id 
caknhny8gw4qm1oyj0umuowmy07co22lfxjamkj9tvhq5wvm...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#683446: unblock: libqt4pas/2.5-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #683446,
regarding unblock: libqt4pas/2.5-7
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
683446: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683446
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package libqt4pas

Rev7 only contains adjustments on the package's symbols file to build on more
(now all) architectures. It does not introduce any new issue and is therefore
safe to accept for Wheezy.

unblock libqt4pas/2.5-7

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.5.0-6-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Hi!
Okay, if Hurd is not important, we can close this report as invalid.
(I don't care about Hurd also, but probably others did)
Sorry for the noise!
Regards,
Matthias

2012/7/31 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
 On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 22:45 +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
 Please unblock package libqt4pas

 Rev7 only contains adjustments on the package's symbols file to build on more
 (now all) architectures.

 From a scan of the diff, all of the changes appear to be hurd-i386
 related?  Given that wheezy won't include any packages on that
 architecture, such changes aren't suitable for an unblock.

 It does not introduce any new issue and is therefore
 safe to accept for Wheezy.

 Non-sequitur.  The freeze policy doesn't consist of does not introduce
 any new issue.

 Regards,

 Adam
---End Message---

NEW changes in proposedupdates

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: automake1.10_1.10.3-1+squeeze1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze6_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze6_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze6_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze6_ia64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze6_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze6_kfreebsd-i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze6_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze6_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze6_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze6_s390.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze6_sparc.changes
  ACCEPT


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1swjop-0004h0...@franck.debian.org

Processed: block 682906 with 683053

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 block 682906 with 683053
Bug #682906 [release.debian.org] unblock: python-defaults/2.7.3-2
682906 was not blocked by any bugs.
682906 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 682906: 683053
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
682906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682906
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13437708687942.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#683452: unblock: phpunit-selenium/1.2.6-3

[Luis Uribe]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Dear release team,

I ask for a freeze exception for phpunit-selenium/1.2.6-3

This upload introduces a README.Debian file with vital information for
using this set of classes.

The attached file was produced using 
debdiff phpunit-selenium_1.2.6-2.dsc phpunit-selenium_1.2.6-3.dsc  
phpunit-selenium_1.2.6-2:1.2.6-3.diff

Thanks

-- 
Luis Uribe
http://eviled.org
diff -Nru phpunit-selenium-1.2.6/debian/changelog phpunit-selenium-1.2.6/debian/changelog
--- phpunit-selenium-1.2.6/debian/changelog	2012-05-31 00:25:31.0 -0500
+++ phpunit-selenium-1.2.6/debian/changelog	2012-07-31 15:00:26.0 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+phpunit-selenium (1.2.6-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * debian/README.Debian
+Adding file
+  * debian/control
+Adding DM-Upload-Allowed
+
+ -- Luis Uribe a...@eviled.org  Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:44:17 -0500
+
 phpunit-selenium (1.2.6-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Replaces: phpunit ( 3.6) and Depends: phpunit (= 3.6) (Closes: #675275).
diff -Nru phpunit-selenium-1.2.6/debian/control phpunit-selenium-1.2.6/debian/control
--- phpunit-selenium-1.2.6/debian/control	2012-05-31 00:25:31.0 -0500
+++ phpunit-selenium-1.2.6/debian/control	2012-07-31 15:00:26.0 -0500
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 Build-Depends-Indep: php-pear
 Standards-Version: 3.9.3
 Homepage: https://github.com/sebastianbergmann/phpunit-selenium
+DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
 Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/pkg-php/phpunit-selenium.git
 Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-php/phpunit-selenium.git
 
diff -Nru phpunit-selenium-1.2.6/debian/README.Debian phpunit-selenium-1.2.6/debian/README.Debian
--- phpunit-selenium-1.2.6/debian/README.Debian	1969-12-31 19:00:00.0 -0500
+++ phpunit-selenium-1.2.6/debian/README.Debian	2012-07-31 15:00:26.0 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+In order to run test that uses phpunit-selenium you need to download the
+Selenium Server from http://seleniumhq.org/download/ (the actual supported
+version of the server is 2.23) and start it with:
+
+  java -jar selenium-server-standalone-X.XX.X.jar
+
+The Selenium Server receives Selenium commands from your tests and
+interprets them, and reports back the results of running those tests.
+
+An example phpunit test:
+?php
+require_once 'PHPUnit/Extensions/SeleniumTestCase.php';
+
+class Example extends PHPUnit_Extensions_SeleniumTestCase
+{
+  function setUp()
+  {
+$this-setBrowser(*firefox);
+$this-setBrowserUrl(http://www.debian.org/;);
+  }
+
+  function testMyTestCase()
+  {
+$this-open(/);
+$this-assertTrue($this-isTextPresent(debian));
+  }
+}
+?
+
+For this test to run, you have to install iceweasel and make a link
+from /usr/bin/firefox to /usr/bin/iceweasel (You may want to save a
+copy of the script originally installed in /usr/bin/firefox)
+
+You can find documentation about how to write tests at
+http://seleniumhq.org/docs/05_selenium_rc.html
\ No newline at end of file


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#683453: unblock: mirror/2.9-62

[Steve McIntyre]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package mirror

Trivial bugfix to add a missing dependency. Debdiff attached.

unblock mirror/2.9-62

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru mirror-2.9/debian/changelog mirror-2.9/debian/changelog
--- mirror-2.9/debian/changelog	2012-05-15 13:15:21.0 +
+++ mirror-2.9/debian/changelog	2012-07-31 21:42:12.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+mirror (2.9-62) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * *Really* add the libperl4-corelibs-perl dependency. Closes: #683448.
+
+ -- Steve McIntyre 93...@debian.org  Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:42:02 +0100
+
 mirror (2.9-61) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Add Depends on libperl4-corelibs-perl. Closes: #667893. Thanks to
diff -Nru mirror-2.9/debian/control mirror-2.9/debian/control
--- mirror-2.9/debian/control	2012-01-23 19:57:47.0 +
+++ mirror-2.9/debian/control	2012-07-31 21:41:16.0 +
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 Package: mirror
 Architecture: all
-Depends: ${perl:Depends}, netbase, patch, ${misc:Depends}
+Depends: ${perl:Depends}, netbase, patch, ${misc:Depends}, libperl4-corelibs-perl
 Recommends: mailx, fping
 Suggests: at, cron
 Description: keeps FTP archives up-to-date

Bug#683453: marked as done (unblock: mirror/2.9-62)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:53:09 +0100
with message-id 1343771589.1551.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683453: unblock: mirror/2.9-62
has caused the Debian Bug report #683453,
regarding unblock: mirror/2.9-62
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
683453: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683453
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package mirror

Trivial bugfix to add a missing dependency. Debdiff attached.

unblock mirror/2.9-62

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru mirror-2.9/debian/changelog mirror-2.9/debian/changelog
--- mirror-2.9/debian/changelog	2012-05-15 13:15:21.0 +
+++ mirror-2.9/debian/changelog	2012-07-31 21:42:12.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+mirror (2.9-62) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * *Really* add the libperl4-corelibs-perl dependency. Closes: #683448.
+
+ -- Steve McIntyre 93...@debian.org  Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:42:02 +0100
+
 mirror (2.9-61) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Add Depends on libperl4-corelibs-perl. Closes: #667893. Thanks to
diff -Nru mirror-2.9/debian/control mirror-2.9/debian/control
--- mirror-2.9/debian/control	2012-01-23 19:57:47.0 +
+++ mirror-2.9/debian/control	2012-07-31 21:41:16.0 +
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 
 Package: mirror
 Architecture: all
-Depends: ${perl:Depends}, netbase, patch, ${misc:Depends}
+Depends: ${perl:Depends}, netbase, patch, ${misc:Depends}, libperl4-corelibs-perl
 Recommends: mailx, fping
 Suggests: at, cron
 Description: keeps FTP archives up-to-date
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 22:46 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
 Please unblock package mirror
 
 Trivial bugfix to add a missing dependency. Debdiff attached.

Unblocked; thanks.

Regards,

Adam---End Message---

Bug#683299: unblock: open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3

[Philipp Kern]

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 03:47:42PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
 On 07/31/2012 03:41 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
  Which is particularly important for this package because...?  And using
  the -9 option (which is recommended against by the xz documentation)
  because...?
 i'm definitely not going to re-iterate what all the people said about
 using xz compression, feel free to watch the debconf talk and look at
 the various threads on the debian mailinglists should you require more
 information why and how it's beneficial to use xz in debian.

To quote the manual page:

| For example, decompressing a file created with xz -9 currently requires
| 65 MiB of memory. 

I don't think that's agreed upon. If anything default options should be used.
But then Julien did ask you the question why it's needed and you avoided it.
That makes a useful discussion pretty hard.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#683299: unblock: open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3

[Bernd Zeimetz]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 07/31/2012 03:45 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
 On 07/31/2012 03:40 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
 Based on what?
 
 tests on my computer.

As it was already explained to you before the release of Squeeze, this is far
far far away from proper testing for a package like open-vm-tools. It should
be tested on current (and maybe even older) ESX instalations. Ballooning,
live-migrations, snapshots with quiesce option and all the other nice features
need to work before it should be released as stable.


 If the system is under load, what guarantees that it won't take more
 time?
 
 as often there are no guarantees, but i tested it under quite some cpu and
 IO load, and it worked for me.
 
 regarding testing migration.. even if it wouldn't help in 100% of all 
 cases, it's better to have it safer in most cases, the current testing 
 package does not have a sleep at all.

Why not add a proper way to handle it instead of a broken workaround?


 Nope.  The proper way is for stop to not return until it's actually
 stopped.
 
 it does that. but again, it's safer in some cases to have the sleep, just
 to be on the safe side.

So you've patched your kill(1) to block until the process is gone? Luckily
this patch did not make it into Debian.

- -- 
 Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485  DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=J106
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50186d66.8040...@debian.org

Bug#682736: unblock: vmware-manager/0.2.0-2

[Alexander Zangerl]

On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:15:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt writes:
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 18:27 +1000, Alexander Zangerl wrote:
 Please unblock package vmware-manager
 
 the version in unstable fixes rc bug #680481,
 which is a file name conflict between the
 packages vmm and vmware-manager: both
 provide a program named vmm, and the man page is
 causing the clash. the fix consists of vmware-manager 
 switching to use /usr/bin/vwm (note: w).

Are vwm and vmm supposed to be identical, other than the name
change?  The version of vmm shipped in -2 appears to include new
changes which are then not carried over in to vmw:

no, that's not the case but seems a problem invented by debdiff:
the package is git-hosted and -built and for some weird reason 
debdiff hands out all kinds of weird deltas here...

attached you'll find a diff -ub between files from the binary packages:
vmm from the 0.2.0-1 and the renamed 0.2.0-2 vwm, which shows that 
apart from renaming vmm into vwm in the POD sections nothing 
has been changed.

regards
az

--- alt/usr/bin/vmm	2012-05-14 13:00:05.0 +1000
+++ neu/usr/bin/vwm	2012-07-08 19:42:57.0 +1000
@@ -2,32 +2,32 @@
 # POD {{{
 =head1 NAME
 
-vmm - Manage VMware virtual machines
+vwm - Manage VMware virtual machines
 
 =head1 SYNOPSIS
 
-	vmm command [options]
+	vwm command [options]
 
 =over
 	
 =item BGlobal syntax:
 
-	vmm command [-f] [-v+] [-w seconds] [@profile]
+	vwm command [-f] [-v+] [-w seconds] [@profile]
 
 =item BCommand specific syntax:
 
-	vmm clone [-o pool] [-c count] [-a datastore...] [-l folder] source vm new vm name
-	vmm deploy [synonym of 'clone']
-	vmm df [-h] [datastore...]
-	vmm host [maintenance|restore|restart|shutdown|disconnect|reconnect] hosts...
-	vmm list [-d col1,col2... | perl string] [-t title] [vm|datastore|host|pool|template][s] [patterns...]
-	vmm migrate [-p low|normal|high] [-o pool] vms... host
-	vmm move [-o pool] vms... datastore
-	vmm setpool low|normal|high cpu|mem|all pools...
-	vmm show [vm|datastore|host|pool] [items...]
-	vmm snapshot [-t title] vms...
-	vmm state on|off|suspend|reboot|shutdown|restart|standby vms...
-	vmm version
+	vwm clone [-o pool] [-c count] [-a datastore...] [-l folder] source vm new vm name
+	vwm deploy [synonym of 'clone']
+	vwm df [-h] [datastore...]
+	vwm host [maintenance|restore|restart|shutdown|disconnect|reconnect] hosts...
+	vwm list [-d col1,col2... | perl string] [-t title] [vm|datastore|host|pool|template][s] [patterns...]
+	vwm migrate [-p low|normal|high] [-o pool] vms... host
+	vwm move [-o pool] vms... datastore
+	vwm setpool low|normal|high cpu|mem|all pools...
+	vwm show [vm|datastore|host|pool] [items...]
+	vwm snapshot [-t title] vms...
+	vwm state on|off|suspend|reboot|shutdown|restart|standby vms...
+	vwm version
 
 =back
 
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
 =item Bversion
 
 Display various version informaiton about the connected vServer and local API.
-This command is the default if no actual command is specified (i.e. just running 'vmm' with nothing else specified).
+This command is the default if no actual command is specified (i.e. just running 'vwm' with nothing else specified).
 
 =back
 
@@ -134,16 +134,16 @@
 Specifies which profile to use when addressing the vServer.
 This can be an entry within the config file or the URL (with optional login details) e.g.
 
-	vmm version @cluster1
-	vmm version @cluster2
-	vmm version @https://cluster1.acme.edu
-	vmm version @https://usern...@cluster1.acme.edu
-	vmm version @https://username:passw...@cluster1.acme.edu
+	vwm version @cluster1
+	vwm version @cluster2
+	vwm version @https://cluster1.acme.edu
+	vwm version @https://usern...@cluster1.acme.edu
+	vwm version @https://username:passw...@cluster1.acme.edu
 
 Examples 1 and two assume 'custer1' and 'customer2' have been defined in the examples file (see EXAMPLES). The further examples specify the connection information on the command line.
 Specifying the password from the command line is exceptionally silly and should be avoided.
 
-If username and/or password is omitted (such as in examples 3 and 4 above) they will be prompted for when vmm is run.
+If username and/or password is omitted (such as in examples 3 and 4 above) they will be prompted for when vwm is run.
 
 =item B-c
 
@@ -228,8 +228,8 @@
 =back
 
 Force continue if an error occurs.
-Normaly if an error occurs vmm will stop processing any operations specified on the command line.
-If this flag is enabled vmm will continue operation as if no error occured.
+Normaly if an error occurs vwm will stop processing any operations specified on the command line.
+If this flag is enabled vwm will continue operation as if no error occured.
 
 =item B--human
 
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@
 =back
 
 Dry run mode.
-When enabled vmm will continue as normal but no actual call to the VMware VServer is made.
+When enabled vwm will continue as normal but no actual call to the VMware VServer is made.
 
 =item B--folder
 
@@ -414,69 +414,69 @@
 
 =over
 
-=item Bvmm 

Re: Freeze exception for texlive-extra 2012.20120611-2

[Norbert Preining]

Dear release managers,

now that texlive-extra 2012.20120611-2 is accepted into unstable and
there the second day, I ask once more for freeze exception:

On Mo, 30 Jul 2012, Norbert Preining wrote:
 Dear Release managers,
 
 I would like to ask for a freeze exception for
   texlive-extra 2012.20120611-2
 The only change made in this release is a fix for a incorrect info
 file, that when run through (g)install-info, under certain circumstances
 (that is not clear by now) creates garbeld UTF8 output in the 
 /usr/share/info/dir file.
 
 The short term solution is fixing the problematic info file, and this
 is what this upload does. It adds another patch under debian/patches
 that fixes the info file, plus adds a line in the debian/patches/series
 file plus a change log entry. That is all.
 
 The first bug report on strange dir files is #555620
 Ian Zimmerman tracked it down to broken info files, and submitted 
 two bug reports, one against texlive-font-utils shipping the problematic
 info file #683201, and one against texinfo that (g)install-info should
 be more robust wrt to errors #683204. Obviously the second one cannot
 be fixed so easily and quickly, so I decided to at least make sure
 that in the currently available packges the info/dir file is not
 created with garbled content.
 
 I attach the full debdiff to this email. There are other changes
 that creeped into the debdiff, due to our packaging of the 
 texlive-{base,extra,doc,lang} package in the same repository, but
 they only related to other packages and are not evaluated
 (changes in tpm2deb.cfg), plus a call to dh_lintian in rules.
 
 Thanks a lot
 
 Norbert
 
 
 Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
 JAIST, Japan TeX Live  Debian Developer
 DSA: 0x09C5B094   fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76  A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
 
 SCRONKEY (n.)
 Something that hits the window as a result of a violent sneeze.
   --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff

 diff -Nru texlive-extra-2012.20120611/debian/changelog 
 texlive-extra-2012.20120611/debian/changelog
 --- texlive-extra-2012.20120611/debian/changelog  2012-06-11 
 12:02:00.0 +0900
 +++ texlive-extra-2012.20120611/debian/changelog  2012-07-30 
 11:09:18.0 +0900
 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
 +texlive-extra (2012.20120611-2) unstable; urgency=low
 +
 +  * fix broken mf2pt1 info file that triggered broken info/dir file
 +under certain circumstances (Closes: #683201)
 +
 + -- Norbert Preining prein...@debian.org  Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:08:33 +0900
 +
  texlive-extra (2012.20120611-1) unstable; urgency=low
  
* new upstream checkout (TL2012 release)
 diff -Nru texlive-extra-2012.20120611/debian/patches/fix-mf2pt1-info 
 texlive-extra-2012.20120611/debian/patches/fix-mf2pt1-info
 --- texlive-extra-2012.20120611/debian/patches/fix-mf2pt1-info
 1970-01-01 09:00:00.0 +0900
 +++ texlive-extra-2012.20120611/debian/patches/fix-mf2pt1-info
 2012-07-30 11:06:59.0 +0900
 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
 +---
 + texmf/doc/info/mf2pt1.info |2 +-
 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
 +
 +Index: texlive-extra-2012.20120611/texmf/doc/info/mf2pt1.info
 +===
 +--- texlive-extra-2012.20120611.orig/texmf/doc/info/mf2pt1.info  
 2012-04-01 08:11:11.0 +0900
  texlive-extra-2012.20120611/texmf/doc/info/mf2pt1.info   2012-07-30 
 11:06:28.760202853 +0900
 +@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 + 
 + INFO-DIR-SECTION TeX
 + START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY
 +-* mf2pt1::   Produce PostScript Type 1 fonts from Metafont source
 ++* mf2pt1: (mf2pt1).   Produce PostScript Type 1 fonts from Metafont source
 + END-INFO-DIR-ENTRY
 + 
 +*mf2pt1*: Produce PostScript Type 1 fonts from Metafont source
 diff -Nru texlive-extra-2012.20120611/debian/patches/series 
 texlive-extra-2012.20120611/debian/patches/series
 --- texlive-extra-2012.20120611/debian/patches/series 2012-05-21 
 09:29:59.0 +0900
 +++ texlive-extra-2012.20120611/debian/patches/series 2012-07-30 
 11:06:59.0 +0900
 @@ -1 +1,2 @@
  fix-scripts
 +fix-mf2pt1-info
 diff -Nru texlive-extra-2012.20120611/debian/rules 
 texlive-extra-2012.20120611/debian/rules
 --- texlive-extra-2012.20120611/debian/rules  2012-06-11 12:29:38.0 
 +0900
 +++ texlive-extra-2012.20120611/debian/rules  2012-07-30 11:14:00.0 
 +0900
 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
  #!/usr/bin/make -f
  # 
  # debian/rules file for texlive-extra
 -# $Id: rules.in 5480 2012-05-16 01:30:56Z preining $
 +# $Id: rules.in 5626 2012-07-29 14:17:10Z preining $
  
  PACKAGES=texlive-bibtex-extra texlive-extra-utils texlive-font-utils 
 texlive-formats-extra texlive-generic-extra texlive-math-extra 
 texlive-plain-extra texlive-latex-extra texlive-fonts-extra texlive-music 
 texlive-games 

Bug#683472: unblock: xen-api/1.3.2-10

[Thomas Goirand]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package xen-api

The current version in Wheezy suffers from a wrong default PAM setting of
PAM, giving access to XAPI to any account on th server, as per:
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-api/2012-07/msg00059.html

Relevant diff:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-xen/xen-api.git;a=commitdiff;h=c75c43b2fd6ab55113023e6f9b6510f5cdd3573e

So, please unblock xen-api/1.3.2-10 ASAP.

Cheers,

Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120801021906.12107.82020.report...@buzig.gplhost.com

Bug#683299: unblock: open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3

[Daniel Baumann]

On 08/01/2012 12:29 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
 I don't think that's agreed upon. If anything default options
 should be used.

i don't think so, see debconf bofh.

the bottom line is that -9 compresses better than -6, and that -9 is
not a problem on amd64 and i386, see debconf talk for more information.

open-vm-tools are only built on amd64 and i386 anyway, architectures
which are both considered to be 'fast' architectures.

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:  daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:   http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50189901.7020...@progress-technologies.net

Bug#683299: unblock: open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3

[Daniel Baumann]

On 08/01/2012 01:42 AM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
 tests on my computer.
 
 As it was already explained to you before the release of Squeeze, this is far
 far far away from proper testing for a package like open-vm-tools. It should
 be tested on current (and maybe even older) ESX instalations. Ballooning,
 live-migrations, snapshots with quiesce option and all the other nice features
 need to work before it should be released as stable.

i don't see the connection to adding a 'sleep 1' for safety, anyhow..

 regarding testing migration.. even if it wouldn't help in 100% of all 
 cases, it's better to have it safer in most cases, the current testing 
 package does not have a sleep at all.
 
 Why not add a proper way to handle it instead of a broken workaround?

..please do share your knowledge of the proper way then and help
making debian better (bug report plus patch would be appreciated).

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:  daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:   http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50189a46.3050...@progress-technologies.net

Bug#682736: unblock: vmware-manager/0.2.0-2

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 09:55 +1000, Alexander Zangerl wrote:
 On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:15:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt writes:
 Are vwm and vmm supposed to be identical, other than the name
 change?  The version of vmm shipped in -2 appears to include new
 changes which are then not carried over in to vmw:
 
 no, that's not the case but seems a problem invented by debdiff:
 the package is git-hosted and -built and for some weird reason 
 debdiff hands out all kinds of weird deltas here...

debdiff is displaying it because it's what's in the source package:

adsb@franck:~$ dpkg-source -x 
ftp/pool/contrib/v/vmware-manager/vmware-manager_0.2.0-1.dsc v-m1
[...]
adsb@franck:~$ dpkg-source -x 
ftp/pool/contrib/v/vmware-manager/vmware-manager_0.2.0-2.dsc v-m2
[...]
adsb@franck:~$ diff -adNru v-m1 v-m2 | diffstat
[...]
 vmm   |   19 
 vwm   | 1382 ++
 8 files changed, 1414 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

If you think debdiff is buggy, please file appropriate bug reports.  The
above agrees with what is shows, however.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1343798528.1551.18.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org

Bug#682736: unblock: vmware-manager/0.2.0-2

[Adam D. Barratt]

On 01.08.2012 06:22, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

adsb@franck:~$ dpkg-source -x
ftp/pool/contrib/v/vmware-manager/vmware-manager_0.2.0-1.dsc v-m1
[...]
adsb@franck:~$ dpkg-source -x
ftp/pool/contrib/v/vmware-manager/vmware-manager_0.2.0-2.dsc v-m2
[...]
adsb@franck:~$ diff -adNru v-m1 v-m2 | diffstat
[...]
 vmm   |   19
 vwm   | 1382
++
 8 files changed, 1414 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

If you think debdiff is buggy, please file appropriate bug reports.  
The

above agrees with what is shows, however.


Similarly, as an example:

adsb@franck:~$ diff -adNru v-m2/v{m,w}m | grep =
 	-file = ($cfgfile ? $cfgfile : \*DATA), # Read defaults from 
__DATA__ section if we cant find a default file.

-default = 'global',
-   -fallback = 'global',
-nocase = 1,
-allowempty = 1,
-   -handle_trailing_comment = 1,

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/27cce14229ef24aeeae4b9e7fae030fe@localhost