Bug#685964: marked as done (unblock: routes/1.13-2)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:07:19 +0200 with message-id 503b1ca7.7080...@thykier.net and subject line Re: Bug#685964: unblock: routes/1.13-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #685964, regarding unblock: routes/1.13-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 685964: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685964 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package routes It fixes an RC-bug and an important one via unstable, each one with a single word fix (so the changelog is the biggest part of the diff to review). unblock routes/1.13-2 Thanks in advance Regards David -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 2012-08-27 05:57, David Prévot wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package routes It fixes an RC-bug and an important one via unstable, each one with a single word fix (so the changelog is the biggest part of the diff to review). unblock routes/1.13-2 Thanks in advance Regards David [...] Unblocked, thanks. ~Niels---End Message---
Bug#685960: unblock: gnupg/1.4.12-5 (pre-approval)
On Mon, August 27, 2012 03:38, David Prévot wrote: Attached the current (from the gnupg package repository) debdiff, excluding the translation, since it contains other pending changes that may not be in line with the current freeze policy (so the release team may point what changes could be acceptable or not). The changes for enable-minimal, I consider as gnupg's maintainer not suitable to upload during the freeze. I can back them out if an upload for the other changes is desired. Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/7fe8f9d2ac65f3e8a33168b31a0b1540.squir...@wm.kinkhorst.nl
Bug#685951: marked as done (unblock: ruby-hoe/3.0.3-2)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:09:35 +0200
with message-id 503b1d2f.1080...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#685951: unblock: ruby-hoe/3.0.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #685951,
regarding unblock: ruby-hoe/3.0.3-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
685951: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685951
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ruby-hoe
This version fixes an important bug (#685330) which causes ruby1.8 to be
installed even if it's not needed. This bug makes it harder for the Ruby
team to phase ruby1.8 out, so it would be nice if this fix could get
into Wheezy.
a git diff against the package in testing is attached.
unblock ruby-hoe/3.0.3-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index f0af190..41f3fac 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+ruby-hoe (3.0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Shawn Landden ]
+ * Change dependency to `rubygems1.9.1 | rubygems` to avoid pulling ruby1.8
+through rubygems if ruby1.9.1 (which provides rubygems1.9.1) is already
+installed.
+(Closes: #685330)
+
+ [ Antonio Terceiro ]
+ * Team upload.
+
+ -- Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org Sun, 26 Aug 2012 18:00:12 -0300
+
ruby-hoe (3.0.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Cédric Boutillier ]
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index cd76740..cbbbfab 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -14,7 +14,11 @@ XS-Ruby-Versions: all
Package: ruby-hoe
Architecture: all
XB-Ruby-Versions: ${ruby:Versions}
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ruby | ruby-interpreter, rake (= 0.8.7), rubygems
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends},
+ ${misc:Depends},
+ ruby | ruby-interpreter,
+ rake (= 0.8.7),
+ rubygems1.9.1 | rubygems
Description: rake/rubygems helper for project Rakefiles
Hoe is a rake/rubygems helper for project Rakefiles. It helps you
manage and maintain, and release your project and includes a dynamic
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 2012-08-26 23:44, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ruby-hoe
This version fixes an important bug (#685330) which causes ruby1.8 to be
installed even if it's not needed. This bug makes it harder for the Ruby
team to phase ruby1.8 out, so it would be nice if this fix could get
into Wheezy.
a git diff against the package in testing is attached.
unblock ruby-hoe/3.0.3-2
[...]
Unblocked, thanks.
~Niels---End Message---
Bug#684910: marked as done (unblock: fcitx/1:4.2.4.1-5)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2012 09:11:58 +0200 with message-id 503b1dbe.3080...@thykier.net and subject line Re: Bug#684910: unblock: fcitx/1:4.2.4.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #684910, regarding unblock: fcitx/1:4.2.4.1-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 684910: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684910 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock fcitx/1:4.2.4.1-4. This version fixes a crash when loading input method wrappers that does not specify an icon of it. Also we are moving the keyboard module (fcitx-keyboard.so) from fcitx-module-x11 to the general fcitx-modules as it does provide some useful features when there is no X, as fcitx-module-x11 depends on fcitx-modules, such move would not cause breakage. -- Regards, Aron Xu ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 2012-08-14 17:49, Aron Xu wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock fcitx/1:4.2.4.1-4. This version fixes a crash when loading input method wrappers that does not specify an icon of it. Also we are moving the keyboard module (fcitx-keyboard.so) from fcitx-module-x11 to the general fcitx-modules as it does provide some useful features when there is no X, as fcitx-module-x11 depends on fcitx-modules, such move would not cause breakage. Unblocked fcitx/1:4.2.4.1-5, thanks. ~Niels---End Message---
Bug#685741: unblock: qpid-cpp/0.16-7
Am Freitag, 24. August 2012, 18:39:28 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 11:00 +0200, Cajus Pollmeier wrote: Am Freitag, 24. August 2012, 10:19:45 schrieben Sie: +-static std::auto_ptrSaslAuthenticator createAuthenticator(Connection connection, bool isShadow); ++ static std::auto_ptrSaslAuthenticator createAuthenticator(Connection connection); createAuthenticator() is a public symbol of libqpidbroker, which is shipped as a public library in /usr/lib. That means the library has changed ABI without changing SONAME afaics. libqpidbroker is only used by the qpid broker itself. There's nothing in testing that uses the broker library - besides the broker itself. Unstable has the qpidd-msgstore module that makes use of that library. qpidd-msgstore is also in testing. Does the earlier version not use the broker library? Hmm. Is it possible to remove it from testing? The version that matches the current 0.16 release of qpidd got stuck because it didn't compile on all architectures. 0.14 qpidd-msgstore will not work with 0.16 of qpidd. I'm not sure if and how I can simply change the SONAME for the broker. And if there's a need for that in this case. Any hints? It's shipped in a public library directory and versioned so yes it should be updated (even without the existence of a reverse dependency). Assuming the SONAMEs come from upstream, it'd be worth discussing the issue with them so we don't end up carrying a Debian-specific change for it. Just sent a message to upstream. Lets see. Cheers, Cajus signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [Pkg-ia32-libs-maintainers] Bug#684029: ia32-libs-i386: Please, downgrade ldap depends to recommends
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 05:38:58PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:16:36 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 12:28:35PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote: Package: ia32-libs-i386 Version: 20120701 Severity: normal Currently, ia32-libs-i386 depends on libldap-2.4-2 (= 2.4.23-7.2) libnss-ldap (= 264-2.2) libpam-ldap (= 184-8.5) I understand that, on systems where ldap is installed on the main (amd64) architecture, installing the corresponding i386 packages is required. However, when the main architecture does not have any ldap infrastructure installed (most laptops for example), we are required to install packages that ask strange questions (ldap base, ...) and that reconfigure /etc/nsswitch. Would it be possible to downgrade the Depends to a Recommends (at least) with a corresponding Breaks ( old-versions) if needed? If this is possible (I did not test), I think this should be applied to the wheezy package. Regards, Vincent Dear release team, would such a change (moving the 3 packages from Depends to Recommends) be suitable for a freeze exception? Wouldn't Recommends be just as wrong? Especially as those packages are recommended against AFAIK (http://www.debian.org/releases/squeeze/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html#new-ldap). Cheers, Julien They are in the squeeze ia32-libs package so dropping them completly would mean a regression on upgrade. Having them as Recommends would make them removable if not needed at least. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120827084349.GA32615@frosties
Bug#685929: marked as done (unblock: torcs/1.3.3+dfsg-0.1)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:10:46 +0100 with message-id c1f9adad94fe6c4bd07232b585e3b...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#685929: unblock: torcs/1.3.3+dfsg-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #685929, regarding unblock: torcs/1.3.3+dfsg-0.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 685929: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685929 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Subject: unblock: torcs/1.3.3+dfsg-0.1 Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: Rudy Godoy r...@stone-head.org Please unblock package torcs It fixes an RC-bug (#685144) by simply removing the useless windows directory from the source package (and the useless CVS directories as advised by Ansgar in the bug report, that were causing FTBFS issue anyway). It also fixes another FTBFS RC-bug (#684845) by protecting the files automatically changed during the build process. The torcs_unstable.diff (with --exclude windows --exclude CVS) shows only those changes. As previously asked in the “torcs and torcs-data-*” thread I'm replying to, the maintainer prepared some other fixes in unstable, mostly documentation related, and a detail in rules already almost accepted by Adam (I hope I read you correctly on this one, apologies if I didn't). The full torcs_testing.diff (with --exclude windows --exclude CVS) show the actual differences from testing. Thanks in Advance. Regards David unblock torcs/1.3.3+dfsg-0.1 P.-S.: copy of 1343243139.495.30.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org in case my “Reply-to” is broken. Le 25/07/2012 15:05, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 07:25 -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote: On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 07:59:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 12:29 -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote: So, in that case I'd like you to let pass rev. 6 (1.3.3-6) packages from sid. You're supposed to provide a rationale, not just say oh, go on, please. ;-p From a quick look at the diff from the version in testing, lintian fixes generally don't qualify for unblocks, nor does a complete rewrite of the copyright file in to DEP-5 format. I guess one could claim that some of the changes are documentation updates, but that's certainly stretching it for the copyright file. Basically, the DEP-5 involved primarily more detailed licensing terms for the game's artwork. Which was not included in the past. From an unblock / review perspective, it would have been more helpful to have simply added those to the existing file. :-( Few things remain to clean-up for some data files, I might need to contact designers/authors for that. Is there an ETA for having that sorted out? Second, with the new packaging layout I also created an VCs repo under the pkg-games umbrella, so that we are able to maintain and support on stable releases. That's already been in testing since May, so isn't really an argument for an unblock. ;-p […] As I indicated at the time, I'd still appreciate the first being answered. Regards, Adam diffstat for torcs-1.3.3 torcs-1.3.3+dfsg README.Debian-source | 12 changelog| 11 +++ rules| 10 ++ 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+) diff -Nru --exclude windows --exclude CVS torcs-1.3.3/debian/changelog torcs-1.3.3+dfsg/debian/changelog --- torcs-1.3.3/debian/changelog 2012-07-05 11:42:03.0 -0400 +++ torcs-1.3.3+dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-08-24 01:10:15.0 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +torcs (1.3.3+dfsg-0.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Repack source, removing src/windows including libraries for Win32 in +binary form only, and useless CVS directories. (Closes: #685144) + * debian/rules: protect automatically modified files during the source +building, restore them at the end of the process, and remove other extra +files during the clean target. (Closes: #684845) + + -- David Prévot taf...@debian.org Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:08:42 -0400 + torcs (1.3.3-6) unstable; urgency=low * Resolved Lintian warnings diff -Nru --exclude windows --exclude CVS torcs-1.3.3/debian/README.Debian-source torcs-1.3.3+dfsg/debian/README.Debian-source --- torcs-1.3.3/debian/README.Debian-source 2012-07-05 11:42:03.0 -0400 +++ torcs-1.3.3+dfsg/debian/README.Debian-source 2012-08-23 22:32:29.0 -0400 @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ +torcs (1.3.3+dfsg-0.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Repack source package: + tar xaf
Bug#685741: unblock: qpid-cpp/0.16-7
On 27.08.2012 08:34, Cajus Pollmeier wrote: Am Freitag, 24. August 2012, 18:39:28 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 11:00 +0200, Cajus Pollmeier wrote: Am Freitag, 24. August 2012, 10:19:45 schrieben Sie: +-static std::auto_ptrSaslAuthenticator createAuthenticator(Connection connection, bool isShadow); ++ static std::auto_ptrSaslAuthenticator createAuthenticator(Connection connection); createAuthenticator() is a public symbol of libqpidbroker, which is shipped as a public library in /usr/lib. That means the library has changed ABI without changing SONAME afaics. libqpidbroker is only used by the qpid broker itself. There's nothing in testing that uses the broker library - besides the broker itself. Unstable has the qpidd-msgstore module that makes use of that library. qpidd-msgstore is also in testing. Does the earlier version not use the broker library? Hmm. Is it possible to remove it from testing? The version that matches the current 0.16 release of qpidd got stuck because it didn't compile on all architectures. 0.14 qpidd-msgstore will not work with 0.16 of qpidd. Okay; removal hint added. I'm not sure if and how I can simply change the SONAME for the broker. And if there's a need for that in this case. Any hints? It's shipped in a public library directory and versioned so yes it should be updated (even without the existence of a reverse dependency). Assuming the SONAMEs come from upstream, it'd be worth discussing the issue with them so we don't end up carrying a Debian-specific change for it. Just sent a message to upstream. Lets see. Thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/596e9857ee124d15e19166bbf512e...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#685942: marked as done (unblock: installation-guide/20120826)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2012 10:36:42 +0100 with message-id e28cdb6beea9fe043ea06f7efcd41...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#685942: unblock: installation-guide/20120826 has caused the Debian Bug report #685942, regarding unblock: installation-guide/20120826 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 685942: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685942 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package installation-guide, so that it can be included in the beta2 of d-i next week. unblock installation-guide/20120826 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.0.4 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org y muhahaha... y ya un train qui part de Perrache à 14h57 y qui passe à Part-Dieu à 15h10 y si je le prend à Perrache, je suis en zone bleue y si je le prends à Part-Dieu, je suis en zone blanche y donc je vais le prendre à Perrache *mais* à Part-Dieu ;-) -+- #ens-mim - vive la SNCF -+- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 26.08.2012 22:14, Samuel Thibault wrote: Please unblock package installation-guide, so that it can be included in the beta2 of d-i next week. Unblocked; thanks. Regards, Adam---End Message---
Bug#683142: Proposed backport
tor 2012-08-23 klockan 17:54 +0200 skrev Cyril Brulebois: Hi Mattias, I'm not sure we're going to consider unblocking bdii, at least in its current form. It looks like a package which pretty much fails to comply with the freeze policy, so unless you come up with minimal changes to only fix actual bugs… (Hint: new upstream release, changing configuration, adding features, fixing lintian warnings, rewriting copyright, etc. are *not* things to do in unstable when you have RC bug fixes you want to get into testing.) Mraw, KiBi. Thank you for your feedback. I here attach a debdiff for a proposed backport of the fix to the RC bug only. Is this an acceptable change? diff -Nru bdii-5.2.5/debian/bdii.lintian-overrides bdii-5.2.5/debian/bdii.lintian-overrides --- bdii-5.2.5/debian/bdii.lintian-overrides 2011-06-14 11:58:13.0 +0200 +++ bdii-5.2.5/debian/bdii.lintian-overrides 2012-08-24 09:09:48.0 +0200 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ -bdii: non-standard-file-perm *etc/bdii/bdii-slapd.conf 0640 != 0644 -bdii: non-standard-file-perm *etc/bdii/bdii-top-slapd.conf 0640 != 0644 +bdii: non-standard-file-perm *usr/share/bdii/bdii-slapd.conf 0640 != 0644 +bdii: non-standard-file-perm *usr/share/bdii/bdii-top-slapd.conf 0640 != 0644 diff -Nru bdii-5.2.5/debian/bdii.postinst bdii-5.2.5/debian/bdii.postinst --- bdii-5.2.5/debian/bdii.postinst 2011-09-27 07:49:57.0 +0200 +++ bdii-5.2.5/debian/bdii.postinst 2012-08-24 11:00:12.0 +0200 @@ -3,14 +3,21 @@ set -e sed s/\(rootpw *\)secret/\1$(mkpasswd -s 0 | tr '/' 'x')/ \ --i /etc/bdii/bdii-slapd.conf /etc/bdii/bdii-top-slapd.conf +-i /usr/share/bdii/bdii-slapd.conf /usr/share/bdii/bdii-top-slapd.conf -chown openldap:openldap /etc/bdii/bdii-slapd.conf -chown openldap:openldap /etc/bdii/bdii-top-slapd.conf +chown openldap:openldap /usr/share/bdii/bdii-slapd.conf +chown openldap:openldap /usr/share/bdii/bdii-top-slapd.conf chown -R openldap:openldap /var/lib/bdii chown -R openldap:openldap /var/log/bdii +# Old versions with slapd configs listed in conffiles +dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile \ +/etc/bdii/bdii-slapd.conf 5.2.5-2+wheezy1~ bdii -- $@ +dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile \ +/etc/bdii/bdii-top-slapd.conf 5.2.5-2+wheezy1~ bdii -- $@ + # Remove obsolete cron script left behind by dpkg -rm -f /etc/cron.d/bdii-proxy +dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile \ +/etc/cron.d/bdii-proxy 5.2.5-2+wheezy1~ bdii -- $@ #DEBHELPER# diff -Nru bdii-5.2.5/debian/bdii.postrm bdii-5.2.5/debian/bdii.postrm --- bdii-5.2.5/debian/bdii.postrm 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ bdii-5.2.5/debian/bdii.postrm 2012-08-24 11:00:12.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +set -e + +# Old versions with slapd configs listed in conffiles +dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile \ +/etc/bdii/bdii-slapd.conf 5.2.5-2+wheezy1~ bdii -- $@ +dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile \ +/etc/bdii/bdii-top-slapd.conf 5.2.5-2+wheezy1~ bdii -- $@ + +# Remove obsolete cron script left behind by dpkg +dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile \ +/etc/cron.d/bdii-proxy 5.2.5-2+wheezy1~ bdii -- $@ + +#DEBHELPER# diff -Nru bdii-5.2.5/debian/bdii.preinst bdii-5.2.5/debian/bdii.preinst --- bdii-5.2.5/debian/bdii.preinst 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ bdii-5.2.5/debian/bdii.preinst 2012-08-24 11:00:12.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +set -e + +# Old versions with slapd configs listed in conffiles +dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile \ +/etc/bdii/bdii-slapd.conf 5.2.5-2+wheezy1~ bdii -- $@ +dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile \ +/etc/bdii/bdii-top-slapd.conf 5.2.5-2+wheezy1~ bdii -- $@ + +# Remove obsolete cron script left behind by dpkg +dpkg-maintscript-helper rm_conffile \ +/etc/cron.d/bdii-proxy 5.2.5-2+wheezy1~ bdii -- $@ + +#DEBHELPER# diff -Nru bdii-5.2.5/debian/changelog bdii-5.2.5/debian/changelog --- bdii-5.2.5/debian/changelog 2011-09-27 07:58:08.0 +0200 +++ bdii-5.2.5/debian/changelog 2012-08-24 09:08:29.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +bdii (5.2.5-2+wheezy1) testing; urgency=low + + * Backport RC bug fix to wheezy (Closes: #663444) + + -- Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:00:09 +0200 + bdii (5.2.5-2) unstable; urgency=low * Remove obsolete cron script left behind by dpkg (Closes: #642589) diff -Nru bdii-5.2.5/debian/rules bdii-5.2.5/debian/rules --- bdii-5.2.5/debian/rules 2011-09-04 20:21:31.0 +0200 +++ bdii-5.2.5/debian/rules 2012-08-24 10:49:27.0 +0200 @@ -45,6 +45,13 @@ sed s/BDII_USER=.*/BDII_USER=openldap/ \ -i debian/bdii/etc/bdii/bdii.conf + # Move bdii slapd config files out of /etc + mkdir debian/bdii/usr/share/bdii + mv debian/bdii/etc/bdii/bdii-slapd.conf debian/bdii/usr/share/bdii + mv debian/bdii/etc/bdii/bdii-top-slapd.conf debian/bdii/usr/share/bdii + ln -s ../../usr/share/bdii/bdii-slapd.conf debian/bdii/etc/bdii + ln -s ../../usr/share/bdii/bdii-top-slapd.conf debian/bdii/etc/bdii + binary-arch: # : @@ -60,6
Bug#683323: unblock: python-apt/0.8.7
ke, 2012-08-08 kello 01:50 +0200, Cyril Brulebois kirjoitti: Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org (30/07/2012): Since the version of testing, this contains mostly bug fixes and many translation updates, but also (starting with 0.8.5) one new module (apt.auth) which is a cleaned up version of an internal software-properties module (and not used by any code in unstable AFAIK). Then I'm not sure we need or want this new module in wheezy… Should this new module be rolled back and a new python-apt release produced just for Wheezy, then? The versions 0.8.5 and 0.8.6 FTBFS due to this new module, as it did not pass the test suite due to two bugs: (1) missing build-time dependency on version 0.9.6 of apt (and outdated buildds) [fixed in 0.8.6], and (2) because it combined the stderr and stdout of the apt-key command it calls which fails to work on kFreeBSD if LD_PRELOAD is set, as gpg (which is run by apt-key) is setuid there [and we use fakeroot for the apt.auth tests, so it fails]. The latter was fixed in 0.8.7. Especially when it took that long to get it to basically work. :( I'll leave the pythonish review to some other python-fluent release team members anyway; just a bit astonished to see new code at this point. At the very least, we need ASAP a new python-apt that removes the deprecated dependencies on Python 2.6 and that incorporates fixes to bugs that existed prior to the freeze. Martin-Éric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1346065817.8083.3.ca...@henna.lan
Bug#683323: unblock: python-apt/0.8.7
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:10:17PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: ke, 2012-08-08 kello 01:50 +0200, Cyril Brulebois kirjoitti: Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org (30/07/2012): Since the version of testing, this contains mostly bug fixes and many translation updates, but also (starting with 0.8.5) one new module (apt.auth) which is a cleaned up version of an internal software-properties module (and not used by any code in unstable AFAIK). Then I'm not sure we need or want this new module in wheezy… Should this new module be rolled back and a new python-apt release produced just for Wheezy, then? How about adding a warning to the module that it is experimental? I'd like to avoid rolling back stuff we already have in newer. Otherwise, we could upload a 0.8.8 with a disabled module as well, but that might create problems later on with merging Ubuntu packages that depend on python-apt (= 0.8.5) and expect apt.auth to be there. We could also create a 0.8.4.1 release for testing, by branching off unstable's 0.8.7, merging the changelog entries for 0.8.5, 0.8.6, and 0.8.7 into 0.8.4.1, and removing apt.auth mentions, and disabling or removing that module. But that is a bit more work. We could also name 0.8.4.1 as 0.8.4+wheezy1, but given that unstable is past 0.8.4 already, just using 0.8.4.X instead of 0.8.4+wheezyX seems a bit nicer. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. pgpgkcVWYvyGg.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#683323: unblock: python-apt/0.8.7
ma, 2012-08-27 kello 13:24 +0200, Julian Andres Klode kirjoitti: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:10:17PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: ke, 2012-08-08 kello 01:50 +0200, Cyril Brulebois kirjoitti: Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org (30/07/2012): Since the version of testing, this contains mostly bug fixes and many translation updates, but also (starting with 0.8.5) one new module (apt.auth) which is a cleaned up version of an internal software-properties module (and not used by any code in unstable AFAIK). Then I'm not sure we need or want this new module in wheezy… Should this new module be rolled back and a new python-apt release produced just for Wheezy, then? How about adding a warning to the module that it is experimental? I'd like to avoid rolling back stuff we already have in newer. Otherwise, we could upload a 0.8.8 with a disabled module as well, but that might create problems later on with merging Ubuntu packages that depend on python-apt (= 0.8.5) and expect apt.auth to be there. I might be wrong but I think that Cyril's point in not accepting 0.8.7 into Testing was that it introduces new features after the freeze. We could also create a 0.8.4.1 release for testing, by branching off unstable's 0.8.7, merging the changelog entries for 0.8.5, 0.8.6, and 0.8.7 into 0.8.4.1, and removing apt.auth mentions, and disabling or removing that module. But that is a bit more work. We could also name 0.8.4.1 as 0.8.4+wheezy1, but given that unstable is past 0.8.4 already, just using 0.8.4.X instead of 0.8.4+wheezyX seems a bit nicer. Either one of 0.8.4.1 or 0.8.4+wheezyX could be introduced via testing-security. Which of these two numbering scheme makes more sense is another question. Cyril might have preferences for that. Martin-Éric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1346067663.8083.7.ca...@henna.lan
Bug#681233: unblock: pynn/0.7.4-1
Hi Yaroslav,
On 22 août 12, at 18:08, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
unblocked anyway...
thanks Julien! you made me blush that I have missed them in my
quick review of the changes.
NB I am CCing upstream who might like to straighten those up
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Julien Cristau wrote:
def setup(timestep=0.1, min_delay=0.1, max_delay=0.1,
debug=False,**extra_params):
+
+logger.debug(setup() called, extra_params =
+str(extra_params))
this is broken, surely it should be below the docstring?
ideally -- yes -- but should be harmless
Should be called at the very beginning of a script.
extra_params contains any keyword arguments that are required
by a given
simulator but not by others.
also the sys.path.append('/usr/lib/python2.x/site-packages/oldxml')
seems like a horrible, horrible hack.
indeed... with not 100% clear motive (besides suggesting wanting
an older xml module, which was just bluntly manually copied on
that system).
Andrew -- could you clarify?:
src/neuroml.py:sys.path.append('/usr/lib/python%s/site-packages/
oldxml' % sys.version[:3]) # needed for Ubuntu
src/neuroml2.py:sys.path.append('/usr/lib/python%s/site-packages/
oldxml' % sys.version[:3]) # needed for Ubuntu
may be those are just left-overs which could be safely dropped?
These two files (neuroml.py and neuroml2.py) are experimental code,
and are not intended to be distributed with PyNN 0.7.x (they will be
cleaned up and tested for the upcoming PyNN 0.8.0)
I can edit the MANIFEST.in file to specifically exclude them, and make
a bug-fix release 0.7.5, but this seems like overkill. Is it necessary?
Best regards, and many thanks again for your work on this,
Andrew
--
Dr Andrew Davison
Unité de Neuroscience, Information et Complexité (UNIC)
Institut de Neurobiologie Alfred Fessard
Centre Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique
1, avenue de la Terrasse
91198 Gif sur Yvette
France
Tel: +33 1 69 82 34 51
http://www.andrewdavison.info/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/0b158b69-7cca-44d3-8c7b-0821f6230...@unic.cnrs-gif.fr
Bug#685994: unblock: pyatspi/2.5.3+dfsg-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package pyatspi version 2.5.3+dfsg-2 merely adds a dependency on libgail-common, which is needed to make some parts of gnome accessible (see bug #682915). unblock pyatspi/2.5.3+dfsg-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.0.4 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org `When you say I wrote a program that crashed Windows, people just stare at you blankly and say Hey, I got those with the system, *for free*.' (By Linus Torvalds) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120827123620.ga5...@type.bordeaux.inria.fr
Bug#686001: unblock: cmigemo/20110227-7
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi release managers, I'll request you to unblock cmigemo package, version 20110227-7. It'll fix http://bugs.debian.org/681321 annoyed bug as bug reporter said 2. This package won't work until users write a caller in their .emacs file. In my opinion, those who install this know what this is explicitly, and want to work well without nothing to do more. It will help users without modifying their settings. debdiff is below, please allow this unblock request, thanks. diff -Nru cmigemo-20110227/debian/changelog cmigemo-20110227/debian/changelog --- cmigemo-20110227/debian/changelog 2012-07-03 00:47:35.0 +0900 +++ cmigemo-20110227/debian/changelog 2012-07-13 19:01:16.0 +0900 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +cmigemo (20110227-7) unstable; urgency=low + + * Fix migemo-coding-system, add default load setting +- Thanks to Kenshi Muto. (Closes: #681321) + + -- Youhei SASAKI uwab...@gfd-dennou.org Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:00:00 +0900 + cmigemo (20110227-6) unstable; urgency=low * Fix upgrade/transition from 'migemo'. diff -Nru cmigemo-20110227/debian/contrib/migemo.el cmigemo-20110227/debian/contrib/migemo.el --- cmigemo-20110227/debian/contrib/migemo.el 2012-06-17 02:05:35.0 +0900 +++ cmigemo-20110227/debian/contrib/migemo.el 2012-07-13 18:37:38.0 +0900 @@ -105,10 +105,9 @@ (if (featurep 'mule) (if (string-match XEmacs emacs-version) (cond - ((memq 'euc-japan-unix (coding-system-list)) 'euc-japan-unix) - ((memq 'euc-jp-unix (coding-system-list)) 'euc-jp-unix)) -'euc-japan-unix)) -(and (boundp 'MULE) *euc-japan*unix)) + ((memq 'utf-8-unix (coding-system-list)) 'utf-8-unix)) +'utf-8-unix)) +(and (boundp 'MULE) *utf-8*unix)) *Default coding system for migemo.el :group 'migemo :type 'coding-system) diff -Nru cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-startup cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-startup --- cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-startup 2012-07-02 22:11:27.0 +0900 +++ cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-startup 2012-07-13 18:58:22.0 +0900 @@ -13,5 +13,16 @@ ;; We have to add this to the load-path: (setq load-path (cons (concat /usr/share/ (symbol-name flavor) - /site-lisp/migemo-el) load-path)) + /site-lisp/migemo-el) load-path)) +;; C/Migemo settings +(setq migemo-command /usr/bin/cmigemo) +(setq migemo-options '(-q --emacs -i \g)) +(setq migemo-dictionary /usr/share/cmigemo/utf-8/migemo-dict) +(setq migemo-user-dictionary nil) +(setq migemo-regex-dictionary nil) +(setq migemo-coding-system 'utf-8-unix) +(load-library migemo) +(migemo-init) + + -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120827230218.7bf4a9dd09f543c356dbb...@debian.or.jp
Re: Beta2 preparation: proposed unblock for netcfg
Hi Gaudenz, Sorina, Philipp, -boot, -release (cc'd for information). Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org (27/08/2012): I'm not opposing this. But on the other hand having it in beta2 would mean that it gets testing now and we could fix eventual issues for beta3. As I said I don't expect there to be any issues, but you never know. Everything is ready and all it needs is an unblock. Yeah, I've had troubles to decide, and now I've got to wait for cdebconf (missing sig for ia64 build) and grub-installer (parasite hint, confusing britney) to migrate anyway, so I've decided to look into this package now. Two things: (1) For Sorina, Gaudenz. 6833ae452a563a360a772fc5dc68399b62082d11: -di_info(Waiting time set to %d, link_waits); +di_info(Waiting time set to %d, link_waits / 4); Hmm, why 4? Let's see. It appears 4 is a magic number, appearing as: | link_waits *= 4; | … | di_info(Waiting time set to %d, link_waits / 4); | … | usleep(25); It might be nice to introduce a constant here to make it explicit what happens, and to be future-proof. (2) For Philipp: be8a052bf38fc121620fff90ea277eafb795713f: +buf = malloc(1024); +slen = readlink(path, buf, 1024); [slen0 check] +buf[slen + 1] = '\0'; If readlink returns 1024, that goes kaboom? (Also, using a constant might be nice.) I've added it to my hints file anyway, let's see how it goes for beta 2. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#683216: marked as done (unblock: tasksel/3.12)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:54:57 +0200
with message-id 20120827145457.gc2...@mraw.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683216: unblock: tasksel/3.12
has caused the Debian Bug report #683216,
regarding unblock: tasksel/3.12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
683216: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683216
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
3.12 contains no code changes, but several changes to task contents.
Possibly the most important change is adding synaptic back to the gnome
desktop task, which had stopped installing it due to pre-freeze changes
to the gnome package recommends. Arguably RC, and certianly the kind of
thing freezes exist to give time to be caught by QA.
As long as the task packages remain (co)installable in this new version,
I'd rate the risk of it breaking things to be low; the installed sizes
of some tasks will change but the documentation and CD layout is not
yet final anyway.
unblock tasksel/3.12
diff -Nru tasksel-3.11/debian/changelog tasksel-3.12/debian/changelog
--- tasksel-3.11/debian/changelog 2012-07-08 12:45:44.0 -0400
+++ tasksel-3.12/debian/changelog 2012-07-21 19:41:41.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,66 @@
+tasksel (3.12) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Andrew Lee (李健秋) ]
+ * Really depending on gdm3 in task-lxde-desktop (Closes: #680519).
+
+ [ Joey Hess ]
+ * xfce: Use network-manager-gnome.
+Rationalle: Everyone I've polled who has installed xfce for nontechnical
+users has had to switch out wicd due to its non-user-friendliness,
+which includes not managing wireless interfaces at all by default,
+and presenting the user with a secreen full of dozens of configuration
+settings when a network requires a password.
+Technical users who want wicd will have no difficulty installing it.
+
+ [ Christian Perrier ]
+ * Use xul-ext-mozvoikko instead of transitional mozvoikko in
+task-finnish-desktop. Closes: #680952
+ * Remove freedict-*, openddict-* and texlive-* from bosnian,
+croatian and serbian tasks. Thanks to Josip Rodin for
+reporting and investigating. Closes: #565209
+ * Replace apache2-mpm-prefork by apache2. Closes: #678749
+ * Replace qpopper and uw-imapd by dovecot-{pop3d,imapd} in the mail server
+task. Closes: #560696
+ * Create en english task with both British and American
+dictionaries and word lists. Consequently drop the british
+task and modify british-desktop. Closes: #545047
+ * Changes related to hunspell used in favoir of aspell:
+- Add hunspell-ro to romanian-desktop. Closes: #583195
+- Add hunspell-be to belarusian-desktop.
+- Replace myspell-en-us by hunspell-en-us in *-desktop.
+- Use hunspell-gl-es instead of hunspell-gl in galician-desktop.
+- Add hunspell-ml to malayalam-desktop.
+- Replace myspell-ru by hunspell-ru in russian-desktop.
+- Replace myspell-fr-gut by hunspell-fr in french-desktop.
+- Add hunspell-ne to nepali-desktop.
+- Add hunspell-sr to serbian-desktop.
+- Add hunspell-vi to vietnamese-desktop.
+- Add hunspell-eu-es to basque-desktop.
+ * Remove the mention that poppler-data is non-free in
+tasks descriptions.
+ * Replace synaptic by apper in kde-desktop. Closes: #681964
+
+ [ Translations of programs ]
+ * Uyghur added. Closes: #627005
+
+ [ Translations of debconf templates ]
+ * Uyghur added. Closes: #627005
+
+ [ Translations of tasks ]
+ * Uyghur added. Closes: #627005
+ * Fix an horrible grammar error in the translation of
+standard in French. Thanks to Cyril Brulebois for
+hitting me with a cluebat.
+
+ [ Aron Xu ]
+ * Update input method support and Chinese tasks. Closes: #681466
+
+ [ Joey Hess ]
+ * Add synaptic to task-gnome-desktop. It had been pulled in by
+nautilus, but that Recommends has been dropped.
+
+ -- Joey Hess jo...@debian.org Sat, 21 Jul 2012 19:41:30 -0400
+
tasksel (3.11) unstable; urgency=low
[ Josh Triplett ]
diff -Nru tasksel-3.11/debian/control tasksel-3.12/debian/control
--- tasksel-3.11/debian/control 2012-07-08 13:00:20.0 -0400
+++ tasksel-3.12/debian/control 2012-07-21 19:36:48.0 -0400
@@ -83,6 +83,8 @@
libreoffice-evolution,
# temporarily moved from task-desktop due to #525077
gimp,
+# Package management.
+ synaptic,
# firefox (ne iceweasel) is the most popular web browser at the moment,
# although both gnome and kde offer their own
Bug#685994: marked as done (unblock: pyatspi/2.5.3+dfsg-2)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:12:47 +0100 with message-id 1346080367.12289.0.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#685994: unblock: pyatspi/2.5.3+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #685994, regarding unblock: pyatspi/2.5.3+dfsg-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 685994: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685994 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package pyatspi version 2.5.3+dfsg-2 merely adds a dependency on libgail-common, which is needed to make some parts of gnome accessible (see bug #682915). unblock pyatspi/2.5.3+dfsg-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.0.4 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash -- Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org `When you say I wrote a program that crashed Windows, people just stare at you blankly and say Hey, I got those with the system, *for free*.' (By Linus Torvalds) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 14:36 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Please unblock package pyatspi version 2.5.3+dfsg-2 merely adds a dependency on libgail-common, which is needed to make some parts of gnome accessible (see bug #682915). Unblocked; thanks. Regards, Adam---End Message---
Permission to upload melange v 2012.1-3 (RC bug: #684736)
Dear Release Team,
I'd like to upload melange 2012.1-3. Mainly, this adds a missing
Depends: python-melange (= ${source:Version})
in the melange binary, which is an RC bug.
But I have also added some aesthetic changes that aren't related, but
which I consider either very minor change, or documentation related. As
per the debian/changelog:
* Added a get-vcs-source target in debian/rules.
* Added a debian/gbp.conf file.
* Fixed debian/copyright syntax and Format: URL.
* Fixed python-melange: capitalization-error-in-description python Python.
The first 2 VCS related addition, I would consider it documenting the
build process using Git, and adding consistency in our Openstack
packages (nova, keystone, and others, also have these).
Rather be safe than sorry, I'm asking first: is it ok to upload the
attached changes to SID, then ask for an unblock?
Let me know.
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
diff -Nru melange-2012.1/debian/changelog melange-2012.1/debian/changelog
--- melange-2012.1/debian/changelog 2012-06-12 20:02:00.0 +
+++ melange-2012.1/debian/changelog 2012-08-27 15:15:25.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+melange (1:2012.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Added myself as uploader.
+ * Add Depends on python-melange for melange binary package (Closes: #684736).
+ * Added a get-vcs-source target in debian/rules.
+ * Added a debian/gbp.conf file.
+ * Fixed debian/copyright syntax and Format: URL.
+ * Fixed python-melange: capitalization-error-in-description python Python.
+
+ -- Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:59:28 +
+
melange (1:2012.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
* rebuild to resolve depends on unavailable factory-boy (Closes: #663397).
diff -Nru melange-2012.1/debian/control melange-2012.1/debian/control
--- melange-2012.1/debian/control 2012-06-12 20:02:00.0 +
+++ melange-2012.1/debian/control 2012-08-27 15:15:25.0 +
@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@
Priority: extra
Maintainer: PKG OpenStack openstack-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Uploaders: Loic Dachary (OuoU) l...@debian.org,
- Ghe Rivero ghe.riv...@stackops.com
+ Ghe Rivero ghe.riv...@stackops.com,
+ Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7.0.50),
python-all (= 2.6.6-3~)
Build-Depends-Indep:
@@ -30,7 +31,7 @@
Package: melange
Architecture: all
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, python, adduser
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, python, adduser, python-melange
(= ${source:Version})
Description: IPAM management service for Openstack - Daemons
Melange is a network information service that provides a centralized
mechanism for managing IPs, MAC addresses and other information that
@@ -58,4 +59,4 @@
needs to be shared across multiple openstack services
(Nova zones, Atlas, Quantum).
.
- This package contains the python libraries.
\ No newline at end of file
+ This package contains the Python libraries.
\ No newline at end of file
diff -Nru melange-2012.1/debian/copyright melange-2012.1/debian/copyright
--- melange-2012.1/debian/copyright 2012-06-12 20:02:00.0 +
+++ melange-2012.1/debian/copyright 2012-08-27 15:15:25.0 +
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
-Format: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5
+Format: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
Upstream-Name: melange
Source: http://openstack.org/openstack/melange
Files: *
Copyright: 2010 United States Government as represented by the Administrator
of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
-Copyright: 2010-2011 OpenStack LLC
-Copyright: Others (See individual files for more details)
+ 2010-2011 OpenStack LLC
+ Others (See individual files for more details)
License: Apache-2
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the License);
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
diff -Nru melange-2012.1/debian/gbp.conf melange-2012.1/debian/gbp.conf
--- melange-2012.1/debian/gbp.conf 1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 +
+++ melange-2012.1/debian/gbp.conf 2012-08-27 15:15:25.0 +
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+[DEFAULT]
+upstream-branch = master
+debian-branch = debian/unstable
+upstream-tag = %(version)s
+compression = xz
+
+[git-buildpackage]
+export-dir = ../build-area/
diff -Nru melange-2012.1/debian/rules melange-2012.1/debian/rules
--- melange-2012.1/debian/rules 2012-06-12 20:02:00.0 +
+++ melange-2012.1/debian/rules 2012-08-27 15:15:25.0 +
@@ -12,4 +12,16 @@
override_dh_auto_install:
dh_auto_install
- cp $(CURDIR)/etc/melange/melange.conf.sample
$(CURDIR)/debian/melange/etc/melange/melange.conf
\ No newline at end of file
+ cp $(CURDIR)/etc/melange/melange.conf.sample
$(CURDIR)/debian/melange/etc/melange/melange.conf
+
+get-vcs-source:
+ git remote add upstream git://github.com/openstack/melange.git || true
+ git fetch upstream
+ if ! [ -e ../melange_2012.1.orig.tar.xz
Re: Permission to upload melange v 2012.1-3 (RC bug: #684736)
Hi Thomas.
Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr (27/08/2012):
I'd like to upload melange 2012.1-3. Mainly, this adds a missing
Depends: python-melange (= ${source:Version})
in the melange binary, which is an RC bug.
Please fix that only.
But I have also added some aesthetic changes that aren't related, but
which I consider either very minor change, or documentation related. As
per the debian/changelog:
* Added a get-vcs-source target in debian/rules.
* Added a debian/gbp.conf file.
* Fixed debian/copyright syntax and Format: URL.
Those don't match the freeze rules. (And frankly, hardcoding the
upstream version in the get-vcs-source target?)
* Fixed python-melange: capitalization-error-in-description python Python.
I guess we could consider that.
The first 2 VCS related addition, I would consider it documenting the
build process using Git, and adding consistency in our Openstack
packages (nova, keystone, and others, also have these).
Something for the next release cycle.
Rather be safe than sorry, I'm asking first: is it ok to upload the
attached changes to SID, then ask for an unblock?
Please fix bugs, please don't add irrelevant changes (aka. please follow
the rules).
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#686020: acpi-support-base: Please downgrade consolekit recommend into a suggestion
Package: acpi-support-base Version: 0.140-5 Severity: important Hello, The installed size of the base system has increased a lot between squeeze and wheezy. One of the reasons is that acpi-support-base now recommends consolekit, which brings a lot of things (libx11, libglib, dbus, ...). Is there a strong reason to get consolekit pulled even for a base system? Samuel -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.0.4 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages acpi-support-base depends on: ii acpid 1:2.0.16-1 Versions of packages acpi-support-base recommends: ii consolekit 0.4.5-3.1 Versions of packages acpi-support-base suggests: ii acpi-support 0.140-5 -- no debconf information -- Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org /* * [...] Note that 120 sec is defined in the protocol as the maximum * possible RTT. I guess we'll have to use something other than TCP * to talk to the University of Mars. * PAWS allows us longer timeouts and large windows, so once implemented * ftp to mars will work nicely. */ (from /usr/src/linux/net/inet/tcp.c, concerning RTT [retransmission timeout]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120827164723.ga17...@type.bordeaux.inria.fr
Bug#685882: unblock: zoneminder/1.25.0-2
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 14:37:34 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
diff -Nru zoneminder-1.25.0/debian/rules zoneminder-1.25.0/debian/rules
--- zoneminder-1.25.0/debian/rules2011-12-12 14:48:18.0 -0800
+++ zoneminder-1.25.0/debian/rules2012-08-23 13:27:54.0 -0700
@@ -17,21 +17,18 @@
DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)
-CFLAGS = -Wall -g
-CPPFLAGS = -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS
-CXXFLAGS = -DZM_FFMPEG_CVS -DHAVE_LIBCRYPTO
-
-ifneq (,$(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
- CFLAGS += -O0
-else
- CFLAGS += -O2
-endif
+CFLAGS = $(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CFLAGS)
+CPPFLAGS = $(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CPPFLAGS)
+CXXFLAGS = $(shell dpkg-buildflags --get CXXFLAGS)
+CFLAGS += -Wall -g
+CPPFLAGS += -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS
+CXXFLAGS += -DZM_FFMPEG_CVS -DHAVE_LIBCRYPTO
%:
dh $@ --with autoreconf
override_dh_auto_configure:
- CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) CXXFLAGS=$(CXXFLAGS) ./configure
--host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) --build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)
--sysconfdir=/etc/zm --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info --with-mysql=/usr
--with-webdir=/usr/share/zoneminder --with-ffmpeg=/usr
--with-cgidir=/usr/lib/cgi-bin --with-webuser=www-data
--with-webgroup=www-data --enable-crashtrace=no --enable-mmap=yes
+ ./configure --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) --build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)
--sysconfdir=/etc/zm --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info --with-mysql=/usr
--with-webdir=/usr/share/zoneminder --with-ffmpeg=/usr
--with-cgidir=/usr/lib/cgi-bin --with-webuser=www-data
--with-webgroup=www-data --enable-crashtrace=no --enable-mmap=yes
How are the build flags passed to configure? They don't seem to be
explicitly exported, and you removed them from the configure cmdline.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#686024: Unblock suitesparse/1:3.4.0-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package suitesparse_1:3.4.0-3 The only essential change is the fix of #682177. Diff is attached. unblock suitesparse/1:3.4.0-3 Thanks. Anton suitesparse.diff Description: Binary data
Bug#680890: marked as done (unblock: alsa-base/1.0.25+2+nmu1)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2012 18:38:16 +0100 with message-id 1346089096.12289.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#680890: unblock: alsa-base/1.0.25+2+nmu1 has caused the Debian Bug report #680890, regarding unblock: alsa-base/1.0.25+2+nmu1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 680890: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680890 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package alsa-base for the RC bug fix just uploaded for #673679. The complicating factor here is the udeb. alsa-drivers provides the old alsa-base udeb in testing which is now provided by alsa-base in unstable. 48 days old (needed 10 days) Not touching package due to block-udeb request by freeze (contact debian-release if update is needed) unblock alsa-base/1.0.25+2+nmu1 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: armel i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 21:18 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (08/07/2012): Please unblock package alsa-base for the RC bug fix just uploaded for #673679. The complicating factor here is the udeb. alsa-drivers provides the old alsa-base udeb in testing which is now provided by alsa-base in unstable. and thanks for the bug fix. Due to the udeb part of it, the unblock request will only be considered once d-i beta 1 is out, once somebody has figured out the consequences on d-i. +nmu2 was uploaded and unblocked, to include the fix for #685885; thus closing. Regards, Adam---End Message---
Apt downloads all description translations
Control: tags 641967 + important Control: tags 678227 + important Hello, The issue also happens at debian-installer time, thus downloading way more than necessary, and taking a lot of disk space (seen 82M here) for no reason, thus moving the embedded barrier yet higher for Debian. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120827174323.ga22...@type.bordeaux.inria.fr
Re: [Openstack-devel] Bug#684736: Permission to upload melange v 2012.1-3 (RC bug: #684736)
Hi Cyril,
Thanks for your review.
On 08/28/2012 12:11 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi Thomas.
Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr (27/08/2012):
I'd like to upload melange 2012.1-3. Mainly, this adds a missing
Depends: python-melange (= ${source:Version})
in the melange binary, which is an RC bug.
Please fix that only.
Ok, I'll do that.
(And frankly, hardcoding the
upstream version in the get-vcs-source target?)
Well, Melange is going to go away in the next release of Openstack, so I
didn't care... :)
* Fixed python-melange: capitalization-error-in-description python Python.
I guess we could consider that.
Can I at least also fix the debian/copyright, as per my diff?
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/503bb492.90...@goirand.fr
Bug#686028: pu: package geshi/1.0.8.4-1+squeeze1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear release team,
I have an upload of geshi for Squeeze ready. The upload fixes #685324. The
upload was requested by Jonathan Wiltshire [1]. I attach a debdiff between
the version currently in Squeeze and my prepared update.
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685324#58
Best regards
Jan Dittberner
--
Jan Dittberner - Debian Developer
GPG-key: 4096R/558FB8DD 2009-05-10
B2FF 1D95 CE8F 7A22 DF4C F09B A73E 0055 558F B8DD
http://ddportfolio.debian.net/ - http://people.debian.org/~jandd/
diff -u geshi-1.0.8.4/debian/rules geshi-1.0.8.4/debian/rules
--- geshi-1.0.8.4/debian/rules
+++ geshi-1.0.8.4/debian/rules
@@ -10,6 +10,11 @@
DEB_INSTALL_CHANGELOGS_php-geshi := docs/CHANGES
+clean::
+ # fix #685324
+ rm -f contrib/cssgen.php
+
+
binary-predeb/php-geshi::
find debian/php-geshi -depth \( -name .cvsignore -o -name .arch-ids
-o -name '*.swp' \) -exec rm -rf {} \;
find debian/php-geshi -type f -executable -exec chmod -x {} \;
diff -u geshi-1.0.8.4/debian/changelog geshi-1.0.8.4/debian/changelog
--- geshi-1.0.8.4/debian/changelog
+++ geshi-1.0.8.4/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+geshi (1.0.8.4-1+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Team upload.
+ * Fix Local File Inclusion Vulnerability in contrib script use debian/rules
+to remove contrib/cssgen.php from bundled examples (Closes: #685324)
+
+ -- Jan Dittberner ja...@debian.org Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:06:25 +0200
+
geshi (1.0.8.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#685116: Fwd: Re: pu: package nvidia-graphics-drivers/195.36.31-6squeeze2
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes: Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de writes: I haven't forgotten about this, but uploading this package I currently get a REJECT with a python traceback from dak (#685807). @Russ: in case someone fixes dak, could you try to re-upload this, it's tagged in SVN and builds in plain squeeze. Sure, no problem. I've changed the distribution to stable to work around this bug and have just now uploaded again. We'll see if dak handles it this time. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87r4qsgq7d@windlord.stanford.edu
Re: Bug#685116: Fwd: Re: pu: package nvidia-graphics-drivers/195.36.31-6squeeze2
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes: Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes: Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de writes: I haven't forgotten about this, but uploading this package I currently get a REJECT with a python traceback from dak (#685807). @Russ: in case someone fixes dak, could you try to re-upload this, it's tagged in SVN and builds in plain squeeze. Sure, no problem. I've changed the distribution to stable to work around this bug and have just now uploaded again. We'll see if dak handles it this time. Yup, that seems to have worked. Should now be ready for action by the stable release managers. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87fw78gpu2@windlord.stanford.edu
Processed: Re: Bug#685961: pu: package alpine/2.00+dfsg-6+squeeze1
Processing control commands: tags -1 + squeeze confirmed Bug #685961 [release.debian.org] pu: package alpine/2.00+dfsg-6+squeeze1 Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed. -- 685961: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685961 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b685961.13460920393465.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#685961: pu: package alpine/2.00+dfsg-6+squeeze1
Control: tags -1 + squeeze confirmed On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 18:48 -0700, Asheesh Laroia wrote: (This is my first stable proposed update, so if I get a process item wrong, please pardon me and help me correct it. Thanks!) Overall, it looks good; thanks. :-) Bug #653238 describes a crasher bug, possibly a security vulnerability, in alpine. The security team has indicated on the bug that they're not going to open a Debian Security Advisory for the alpine bug, and indicate, You/the maintainer may choose to fix it in (old)stable through a point update, or leave it at this. I choose to update stable through a point update. I assume from reading through the bug report that the issue does not affect the version of alpine currently in wheezy / sid? If so, please add an appropriate fixed version to make this clear. I've prepared a minimal package update that adds the patch that fixes the issue. I've tested that it builds fine in a stable pbuilder; before uploading, I have tested it on a machine running stable, where it works fine. Assuming my comment above about the issue not affecting wheezy and sid is correct, please feel free to go ahead with the upload, having updated the bug report as above. Oh, actually: +alpine (2.00+dfsg-6+squeeze1) squeeze; urgency=low That's fine, but there's currently a dak bug which means that squeeze in the distribution doesn't work; you'll need to either make it stable, or wait for the dak bug to get fixed. (#685807) As a footnote: I believe the process on my end is: * Get y'all's approval * Upload the package using dput ftp-master alpine_2.00+dfsg-6+squeeze1.dsc (with a binary package, as usual in Debian) * Watch it flow through into squeeze-updates with no further effort from me Almost, except it'll hit proposed-updates (once a member of the release team has flagged it appropriately to dak). squeeze-updates is a particular subset of p-u which is made separately available earlier than the point release (of course p-u is publicly available anyway, but not everyone wants to enable it in their sources.list on stable machines). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1346091950.12289.9.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#684763: pu: package tor/0.2.2.38-1
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 17:26 +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 10:23 +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: Apologies for not spotting earlier that there wasn't one attached, but please could we have a debdiff against the package currently in p-u? Ok, built a package for review. Patches attached. Thanks. Please go ahead. Great, thanks. Uploaded. I've just flagged the package for acceptance in to p-u; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1346092743.12289.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#684763: pu: package tor/0.2.2.38-1
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #684763 [release.debian.org] pu: package tor/0.2.2.38-1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 684763: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684763 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b684763.13460928308701.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#686028: pu: package geshi/1.0.8.4-1+squeeze1
Control: tags -1 + squeeze confirmed On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 20:09 +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote: I have an upload of geshi for Squeeze ready. The upload fixes #685324. The upload was requested by Jonathan Wiltshire [1]. I attach a debdiff between the version currently in Squeeze and my prepared update. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685324#58 Assuming that the resulting package has been tested on a squeeze system, please go ahead. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1346092602.12289.12.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#686028: pu: package geshi/1.0.8.4-1+squeeze1
Processing control commands: tags -1 + squeeze confirmed Bug #686028 [release.debian.org] pu: package geshi/1.0.8.4-1+squeeze1 Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed. -- 686028: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686028 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b686028.13460926897749.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: tor_0.2.2.38-1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1t64l2-000187...@franck.debian.org
Bug#685961: pu: package alpine/2.00+dfsg-6+squeeze1
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 19:25 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Oh, actually: +alpine (2.00+dfsg-6+squeeze1) squeeze; urgency=low That's fine, but there's currently a dak bug which means that squeeze in the distribution doesn't work; you'll need to either make it stable, or wait for the dak bug to get fixed. (#685807) Apparently the bug only affects DM uploads, so the original debdiff will be fine. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1346094449.12289.15.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#686031: unblock: debdelta/0.50
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Sorry to bother again! Please unblock package debdelta; the GnuPG signing key expired on 20th Aug (I had forgotten!), I included a new one, and moreover I corrected some messages and translations (thanks to d-italian people). a. unblock debdelta/0.50 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Andrea Mennucc E' un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa! (Tonino Carotone) diff -Nru debdelta-0.49/debdelta debdelta-0.50/debdelta --- debdelta-0.49/debdelta 2012-08-02 07:22:49.0 +0200 +++ debdelta-0.50/debdelta 2012-08-26 22:24:26.0 +0200 @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ doc['deltas']=_(\ -Usage: debdeltas [ option... ] [deb files and dirs, or 'Package' files] +Usage: debdeltas [ option... ] [deb files and dirs, or 'Packages' files] Computes all missing deltas for deb files. It orders by version number and produce deltas to the newest version @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ key used to sign the deltas (using GnuPG) --dir DIR force saving of deltas in this DIR (otherwise they go in the dir of the newer deb_file) ---old ARGS 'Package' files containing list of old versions of debs +--old ARGS 'Packages' files containing list of old versions of debs --alt ARGS for any cmdline argument, search for debs also in this place -n N how many deltas to produce for each deb (default unlimited) --no-md5do not include MD5 info in delta diff -Nru debdelta-0.49/debdeltas debdelta-0.50/debdeltas --- debdelta-0.49/debdeltas 2012-08-02 07:22:49.0 +0200 +++ debdelta-0.50/debdeltas 2012-08-26 22:24:26.0 +0200 @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ doc['deltas']=_(\ -Usage: debdeltas [ option... ] [deb files and dirs, or 'Package' files] +Usage: debdeltas [ option... ] [deb files and dirs, or 'Packages' files] Computes all missing deltas for deb files. It orders by version number and produce deltas to the newest version @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ key used to sign the deltas (using GnuPG) --dir DIR force saving of deltas in this DIR (otherwise they go in the dir of the newer deb_file) ---old ARGS 'Package' files containing list of old versions of debs +--old ARGS 'Packages' files containing list of old versions of debs --alt ARGS for any cmdline argument, search for debs also in this place -n N how many deltas to produce for each deb (default unlimited) --no-md5do not include MD5 info in delta diff -Nru debdelta-0.49/debdelta-upgrade debdelta-0.50/debdelta-upgrade --- debdelta-0.49/debdelta-upgrade 2012-08-02 07:22:49.0 +0200 +++ debdelta-0.50/debdelta-upgrade 2012-08-26 22:24:26.0 +0200 @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ doc['deltas']=_(\ -Usage: debdeltas [ option... ] [deb files and dirs, or 'Package' files] +Usage: debdeltas [ option... ] [deb files and dirs, or 'Packages' files] Computes all missing deltas for deb files. It orders by version number and produce deltas to the newest version @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ key used to sign the deltas (using GnuPG) --dir DIR force saving of deltas in this DIR (otherwise they go in the dir of the newer deb_file) ---old ARGS 'Package' files containing list of old versions of debs +--old ARGS 'Packages' files containing list of old versions of debs --alt ARGS for any cmdline argument, search for debs also in this place -n N how many deltas to produce for each deb (default unlimited) --no-md5do not include MD5 info in delta diff -Nru debdelta-0.49/debian/changelog debdelta-0.50/debian/changelog --- debdelta-0.49/debian/changelog 2012-08-06 16:20:04.0 +0200 +++ debdelta-0.50/debian/changelog 2012-08-26 22:14:26.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +debdelta (0.50) unstable; urgency=medium + + * ship 2012 gpg public key (to verify deltas with debdelta-upgrade) + * correct typo in program message + * correct italian translation of program messages +according to d-italian rules + + -- A Mennucc1 mennu...@debian.org Sun, 26 Aug 2012 21:10:55 +0200 + debdelta (0.49) unstable; urgency=low * update italian translation of program messages diff -Nru debdelta-0.49/debpatch debdelta-0.50/debpatch --- debdelta-0.49/debpatch 2012-08-02 07:22:49.0 +0200 +++ debdelta-0.50/debpatch 2012-08-26 22:24:26.0 +0200 @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ doc['deltas']=_(\ -Usage: debdeltas [ option... ] [deb files and dirs, or 'Package' files] +Usage: debdeltas [ option... ] [deb files and dirs, or 'Packages' files] Computes all missing deltas for deb files. It orders by version number and produce deltas to the newest version @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ key used to sign the deltas (using GnuPG)
Bug#686001: marked as done (unblock: cmigemo/20110227-7)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:17:46 +0200 with message-id 503bc7da.6020...@thykier.net and subject line Re: Bug#686001: unblock: cmigemo/20110227-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #686001, regarding unblock: cmigemo/20110227-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 686001: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686001 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi release managers, I'll request you to unblock cmigemo package, version 20110227-7. It'll fix http://bugs.debian.org/681321 annoyed bug as bug reporter said 2. This package won't work until users write a caller in their .emacs file. In my opinion, those who install this know what this is explicitly, and want to work well without nothing to do more. It will help users without modifying their settings. debdiff is below, please allow this unblock request, thanks. diff -Nru cmigemo-20110227/debian/changelog cmigemo-20110227/debian/changelog --- cmigemo-20110227/debian/changelog 2012-07-03 00:47:35.0 +0900 +++ cmigemo-20110227/debian/changelog 2012-07-13 19:01:16.0 +0900 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +cmigemo (20110227-7) unstable; urgency=low + + * Fix migemo-coding-system, add default load setting +- Thanks to Kenshi Muto. (Closes: #681321) + + -- Youhei SASAKI uwab...@gfd-dennou.org Fri, 13 Jul 2012 19:00:00 +0900 + cmigemo (20110227-6) unstable; urgency=low * Fix upgrade/transition from 'migemo'. diff -Nru cmigemo-20110227/debian/contrib/migemo.el cmigemo-20110227/debian/contrib/migemo.el --- cmigemo-20110227/debian/contrib/migemo.el 2012-06-17 02:05:35.0 +0900 +++ cmigemo-20110227/debian/contrib/migemo.el 2012-07-13 18:37:38.0 +0900 @@ -105,10 +105,9 @@ (if (featurep 'mule) (if (string-match XEmacs emacs-version) (cond - ((memq 'euc-japan-unix (coding-system-list)) 'euc-japan-unix) - ((memq 'euc-jp-unix (coding-system-list)) 'euc-jp-unix)) -'euc-japan-unix)) -(and (boundp 'MULE) *euc-japan*unix)) + ((memq 'utf-8-unix (coding-system-list)) 'utf-8-unix)) +'utf-8-unix)) +(and (boundp 'MULE) *utf-8*unix)) *Default coding system for migemo.el :group 'migemo :type 'coding-system) diff -Nru cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-startup cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-startup --- cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-startup 2012-07-02 22:11:27.0 +0900 +++ cmigemo-20110227/debian/migemo-el.emacsen-startup 2012-07-13 18:58:22.0 +0900 @@ -13,5 +13,16 @@ ;; We have to add this to the load-path: (setq load-path (cons (concat /usr/share/ (symbol-name flavor) - /site-lisp/migemo-el) load-path)) + /site-lisp/migemo-el) load-path)) +;; C/Migemo settings +(setq migemo-command /usr/bin/cmigemo) +(setq migemo-options '(-q --emacs -i \g)) +(setq migemo-dictionary /usr/share/cmigemo/utf-8/migemo-dict) +(setq migemo-user-dictionary nil) +(setq migemo-regex-dictionary nil) +(setq migemo-coding-system 'utf-8-unix) +(load-library migemo) +(migemo-init) + + ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 2012-08-27 16:02, Hideki Yamane wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi release managers, I'll request you to unblock cmigemo package, version 20110227-7. It'll fix http://bugs.debian.org/681321 annoyed bug as bug reporter said 2. This package won't work until users write a caller in their .emacs file. In my opinion, those who install this know what this is explicitly, and want to work well without nothing to do more. It will help users without modifying their settings. debdiff is below, please allow this unblock request, thanks. [...] Unblocked, thanks. ~Niels---End Message---
Bug#686031: unblock: debdelta/0.50
On 2012-08-27 21:11, A Mennucc wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Sorry to bother again! Please unblock package debdelta; the GnuPG signing key expired on 20th Aug (I had forgotten!), I included a new one, and moreover I corrected some messages and translations (thanks to d-italian people). a. unblock debdelta/0.50 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Whats up with: debdelta-0.50/po/fr.mo |binary debdelta-0.50/po/it.mo |binary I would expect these to be generated during build; have they been added by mistake? ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/503bc8f6.1050...@thykier.net
Re: Chances to obtain a freeze-exception for condor?
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:39:48AM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote: I have uploaded an updated 'condor' package to experimental. It fixes all remaining (user-relevant) annoyances of the current version in testing. The fixes are only a few lines per bug, and they are only changes in the packaging itself. The full diff to the version in testing is attached. Here are the stats (most lines are comments/docs): debian/changelog | 18 ++ debian/condor.links|1 - debian/condor.postinst | 24 debian/condor_qsub |3 +-- Bugs fixed are: #684667, #684879, and #678425 (none of them RC). Would you allow for a freeze exception of an upload to unstable with these changes (or any subset you would name)? And what about FTBFS fixes for alpha? http://bugs.debian.org/685892 Michael -- Michael Hanke http://mih.voxindeserto.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120827200049.GA22809@meiner
Bug#685331: unblock: (pre-approval) src:calligra/1:2.4.3-2
On 2012-08-24 14:49, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
+--- a/filters/words/msword-odf/wv2/src/styles.cpp
b/filters/words/msword-odf/wv2/src/styles.cpp
+@@ -248,6 +248,11 @@ throw(InvalidFormatException)
+ #ifdef WV2_DEBUG_STYLESHEET
+ wvlog cbUPX: cbUPX endl;
+ #endif
++// do not overflow the allocated buffer grupx
++if (offset + cbUPX grupxLen) {
^
In my experience it is either
if (offset + i limit) { /* safe */ }
or
if (offset + i = limit) { /* abort */ }
Is offset + cbUPX == grupxLen really a safe index?
++wvlog Error: grupx would overflow! endl;
++return false;
++}
+ for ( U16 j = 0; j cbUPX; ++j ) {
^
This suggests it might not be...
+ grupx[ offset + j ] = stream-readU8(); // read the whole UPX
+ #ifdef WV2_DEBUG_STYLESHEET
+--
+1.7.10.4
+
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/503bd3d0.8030...@thykier.net
Processed: Re: Bug#685116: Fwd: Re: pu: package nvidia-graphics-drivers/195.36.31-6squeeze2
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #685116 [release.debian.org] pu: package nvidia-graphics-drivers/195.36.31-6squeeze2 Added tag(s) pending. -- 685116: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685116 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b685116.134609874716586.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#685116: Fwd: Re: pu: package nvidia-graphics-drivers/195.36.31-6squeeze2
Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 11:11 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes: Andreas Beckmann deb...@abeckmann.de writes: I haven't forgotten about this, but uploading this package I currently get a REJECT with a python traceback from dak (#685807). @Russ: in case someone fixes dak, could you try to re-upload this, it's tagged in SVN and builds in plain squeeze. Sure, no problem. I've changed the distribution to stable to work around this bug and have just now uploaded again. We'll see if dak handles it this time. As noted in your follow-up, it did. It transpires the bug only affects DM uploads, so a package destined for squeeze but signed by your key would apparently have worked fine. I've just flagged the package for acceptance in to p-u; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1346098659.12289.19.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: nvidia-graphics-drivers_195.36.31-6squeeze2_multi.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1t66dg-0002a9...@franck.debian.org
Bug#686035: unblock: palp/1.1-1.2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package palp palp contains a COPYING file including the line The package must be distributed as a whole, including this file. But the binary package doesn't contain the file. The author clarified in the bug report #675301 that this line is no longer applicable. This update documents the license change in debian/copyright and closes the RC bug #675301. unblock palp/1.1-1.2 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (650, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120827212139.6549.73302.reportbug@tobi-laptop
Bug#686035: marked as done (unblock: palp/1.1-1.2)
Your message dated Mon, 27 Aug 2012 23:24:37 +0200 with message-id 20120827212437.gb4...@mraw.org and subject line Re: Bug#686035: unblock: palp/1.1-1.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #686035, regarding unblock: palp/1.1-1.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 686035: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686035 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package palp palp contains a COPYING file including the line The package must be distributed as a whole, including this file. But the binary package doesn't contain the file. The author clarified in the bug report #675301 that this line is no longer applicable. This update documents the license change in debian/copyright and closes the RC bug #675301. unblock palp/1.1-1.2 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (650, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Tobias Hansen tobias@gmx.de (27/08/2012): […] But the binary package doesn't contain the file. The author clarified in the bug report #675301 that this line is no longer applicable. This update documents the license change in debian/copyright and closes the RC bug #675301. unblock palp/1.1-1.2 Unblocked, thanks. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: tor_0.2.2.38-1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: tor_0.2.2.38-1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: tor_0.2.2.38-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: tor_0.2.2.38-1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: tor_0.2.2.38-1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: tor_0.2.2.38-1_s390.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1t66ge-0006db...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: tor_0.2.2.38-1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: tor_0.2.2.38-1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: tor_0.2.2.38-1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: tor_0.2.2.38-1_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1t66uj-xd...@franck.debian.org
Bug#686041: nmu: python-scientific_2.8-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, Could you please trigger a rebuild, to make the package work again (fixing an RC-bug)? Thanks in advance. nmu python-scientific_2.8-3 . ALL . -m Rebuild with current stuff (Closes: #685812) Regards David -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120827230357.22770.21203.report...@mikado.tilapin.org
brltty changes for wheezy
Hello,
We would like to apply some upstream fixes to the brltty package.
- r6587 fixes accent output in some messages (Bug#680648). It is a
matter of passing them through mbrtowc.
- r6588 simply unfuzzies translations which are actually up-to-date (the
translator didn't know about the fuzzy keyword) (Bug#680638).
- r6592 and r6625 fix typing shift/control/alt from braille devices in
X11 (Bug#681460). The patch looks long, but passing it through interdiff
-w (30-late-fixes-r6592-w.patch) better shows what it changes: if
into switch and a new next_modifiers variable which adds itself to
the existing modifier management. r6625, applied after that, fixes the
behavior.
- r6623 is quite invasive, but without it, the at-spi2 driver simply
does not work at all. That means that brltty can not be used to access
gnome-terminal windows along orca, which makes them way less usable with
a braille device.
- eventually, because of r6623, new build-deps are needed and the
configure script has to be regenerated, see patch. That further
triggers a rebuild of the pot file, which I had to disable trivially
with 40-no-update-pot.patch.
Are these all OK to upload?
Samuel
commit 571992bf34ef0323f6e15aee0e7fd21433dfd4e2
Author: dave dave@91a5dbb7-01b9-0310-9b5f-b28072856b6e
Date: Sun Jul 8 14:32:00 2012 +
setScreenMessage() should do text-Unicode conversion. (dm)
git-svn-id: svn://mielke.cc/main/brltty@6587
91a5dbb7-01b9-0310-9b5f-b28072856b6e
diff --git a/Programs/scr.c b/Programs/scr.c
index fe5d5ad..d50b7fd 100644
--- a/Programs/scr.c
+++ b/Programs/scr.c
@@ -231,14 +231,6 @@ setScreenCharacterText (ScreenCharacter *characters,
wchar_t text, size_t count)
}
void
-copyScreenCharacterText (ScreenCharacter *characters, const char *text, size_t
count) {
- while (count 0) {
---count;
-characters[count].text = text[count];
- }
-}
-
-void
setScreenCharacterAttributes (ScreenCharacter *characters, unsigned char
attributes, size_t count) {
while (count 0) {
characters[--count].attributes = attributes;
@@ -253,14 +245,26 @@ clearScreenCharacters (ScreenCharacter *characters,
size_t count) {
void
setScreenMessage (const ScreenBox *box, ScreenCharacter *buffer, const char
*message) {
- int count = box-width * box-height;
+ const ScreenCharacter *end = buffer + box-width;
+ unsigned int index = 0;
size_t length = strlen(message);
+ mbstate_t state;
+
+ memset(state, 0, sizeof(state));
+ clearScreenCharacters(buffer, (box-width * box-height));
- clearScreenCharacters(buffer, count);
+ while (length) {
+wchar_t wc;
+size_t result = mbrtowc(wc, message, length, state);
+if ((ssize_t)result 1) break;
- if (length box-left) {
-if ((length -= box-left) box-width) length = box-width;
-if (length) copyScreenCharacterText(buffer, message[box-left], length);
+message += result;
+length -= result;
+
+if (index++ = box-left) {
+ if (buffer == end) break;
+ (buffer++)-text = wc;
+}
}
}
diff --git a/Programs/scr.h b/Programs/scr.h
index 171847f..d8282a3 100644
--- a/Programs/scr.h
+++ b/Programs/scr.h
@@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ extern void setScreenMessage (const ScreenBox *box,
ScreenCharacter *buffer, con
extern void clearScreenCharacters (ScreenCharacter *characters, size_t count);
extern void setScreenCharacterText (ScreenCharacter *characters, wchar_t text,
size_t count);
-extern void copyScreenCharacterText (ScreenCharacter *characters, const char
*text, size_t count);
extern void setScreenCharacterAttributes (ScreenCharacter *characters,
unsigned char attributes, size_t count);
#define SCR_KEY_SHIFT 0X4000
Index: brltty/Messages/fr.po
===
--- brltty.orig/Messages/fr.po 2012-07-20 13:43:14.482771503 +1000
+++ brltty/Messages/fr.po 2012-07-20 13:45:24.626774855 +1000
@@ -117,7 +117,6 @@
msgstr Agogo
#: Programs/menu_prefs.c:1031
-#, fuzzy
msgid Alert
msgstr Alerte
@@ -274,7 +273,6 @@
msgstr Sensibilité du braille
#: Programs/menu_prefs.c:1005
-#, fuzzy
msgid Braille Tables
msgstr Tables braille
@@ -361,7 +359,6 @@
msgstr Fermer
#: Programs/menu_prefs.c:902
-#, fuzzy
msgid Colon
msgstr Deux-points
@@ -444,12 +441,10 @@
msgstr Format de la date
#: Programs/menu_prefs.c:922
-#, fuzzy
msgid Date Position
msgstr Position de la date
#: Programs/menu_prefs.c:945
-#, fuzzy
msgid Date Separator
msgstr Séparateur de la date
@@ -462,7 +457,6 @@
msgstr Débogage
#: Programs/brltty.c:557
-#, fuzzy
msgid December
msgstr Décembre
@@ -581,7 +575,6 @@
msgstr Instruments folkloriques
#: Programs/menu_prefs.c:677
-#, fuzzy
msgid Event Alerts
msgstr Signaux d'événements
@@ -724,7 +717,6 @@
msgstr Support du serveur XKB incompatible\n
#: Programs/menu_prefs.c:1036
-#, fuzzy
msgid Information
msgstr Informations
@@ -734,7 +726,6 @@
msgstr Installe le service %s et quittez.
#:
Please unbock imagemagick 6.7.7.10-4
Dear release team, Could you please unblock imagemagick 6.7.7.10-4 ? It contains a minimal fix (debdiff attached) for fixing a potential DoS vulnerability in testing. Many thanks, Vincent imagemagick-debdiff Description: Binary data
Bug#685960: unblock: gnupg/1.4.12-5 (pre-approval)
Hi, Le 27/08/2012 03:00, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit : The changes for enable-minimal, I consider as gnupg's maintainer not suitable to upload during the freeze. I can back them out if an upload for the other changes is desired. Thank you Thijs for your quick answer, so the remaining pending changes in the repository is just about documentation (actual diff attached, the changelog will of course be prettified for the actual upload), and the translation update we're talking about. Both should meet the freeze policy. Can someone from the release team please confirm that you would consider unblocking such an upload of gnupg, knowing that a udeb is involved too? Regards David Index: debian/control === --- debian/control (révision 231) +++ debian/control (révision 283) @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: important Maintainer: Debian GnuPG-Maintainers pkg-gnupg-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org Uploaders: Sune Vuorela deb...@pusling.com, - Daniel Leidert (dale) daniel.leid...@wgdd.de, + Daniel Leidert dleid...@debian.org, Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org Standards-Version: 3.9.3 Build-Depends: debhelper ( 7), libz-dev, libldap2-dev, libbz2-dev, Index: debian/changelog === --- debian/changelog (révision 231) +++ debian/changelog (révision 283) @@ -1,9 +1,15 @@ gnupg (1.4.12-5) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + [ Thijs Kinkhorst ] * Build udebs with --enable-minimal. + * Add lintian override for gnupg-curl non-conflict. - -- Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:53:21 + + [ Daniel Leidert ] + * debian/README.BUGS.Debian: Added note about gpg not returning an error +message if junk is given after --edit-key/--send-keys (closes: #630388). + -- Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:44:33 +0200 + gnupg (1.4.12-4) unstable; urgency=low * Move mingw64 to B-D-I, adjust make targets. This helps debian-ports @@ -33,6 +39,7 @@ - Documents keyid-format and with-colons combination (LP: #808295). - No longer requires readline for gpgv (closes: #592902). - Fixes man page format error for gpg-zip (closes: #606072). +- Fixes gpg manual page (closes: #640140). * As we're now on 0 patches, and dpatch is supposedly obsoleted, take the chance to switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format. * Several packaging tweaks to keep Lintian happy. Index: debian/source.lintian-overrides === --- debian/source.lintian-overrides (révision 0) +++ debian/source.lintian-overrides (révision 283) @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +gnupg source: binaries-have-file-conflict gnupg gnupg-curl usr/lib/gnupg/gpgkeys_curl +gnupg source: binaries-have-file-conflict gnupg gnupg-curl usr/lib/gnupg/gpgkeys_hkp Index: debian/README.BUGS.Debian === --- debian/README.BUGS.Debian (révision 231) +++ debian/README.BUGS.Debian (révision 283) @@ -109,4 +109,19 @@ Debian #485458 URL:http://bugs.debian.org/485458 - -- Daniel Leidert daniel.leid...@wgdd.de, 2009 +gnupg: gpg doesn't print an error if junk is given after --edit-key or + --send-key. + +Citing the upstream author in https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1090: + + We can't print an error message because that would let gpg treturn with + an error code and lead to problems with scripts which assume the current + way of doing things. A warning is possible but Unix tools generally + don't do that. + +Debian #567597 URL:http://bugs.debian.org/567597 +Debian #630388 URL:http://bugs.debian.org/630388 +Ubuntu #389694 URL:http://launchpad.net/bugs/389694 + + + -- Daniel Leidert daniel.leid...@wgdd.de, 2012 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#685195: unblock: aptitude/0.6.8-2
Control: retitle -1 unblock: aptitude/0.6.8.1-1 (pre-approval) Updated. There were some usability issues with these changes: * Improve display of relationships on multi-arch systems: - hide multi-arch implicit relationships, which are an internal aide for libapt-pkg (LP: #972858) - hide duplicate entries in lists of package relationships (Closes: #271465) The implicit relationships are important to show why a package is broken. I have removed these two changes for the time being and hope to find a better solution to the duplication. Remaining changes are repackaged as 0.6.8.1-1, waiting on mentors. Final debdiff attached, stripped of build system and po file noise. I will follow up again once it is in the archive. unblock aptitude/0.6.8.1-1 aptitude_0.6.8.1-1.debdiff Description: Binary data
Processed: Re: Bug#685195: unblock: aptitude/0.6.8-2
Processing control commands: retitle -1 unblock: aptitude/0.6.8.1-1 (pre-approval) Bug #685195 [release.debian.org] unblock: aptitude/0.6.8-2 Changed Bug title to 'unblock: aptitude/0.6.8.1-1 (pre-approval)' from 'unblock: aptitude/0.6.8-2' -- 685195: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685195 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b685195.134612903225149.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#685837: unblock: tomcat-native/1.1.24-1
On 08/25/2012 06:15 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi Tony,
tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org (24/08/2012):
Please consider an unblock for package tomcat-native due to #685516.
The current version in wheezy (1.1.23) is incompatible with the
version of tomcat7-7.0.28 in wheezy.
that's the kind of things which would have been nice to have in the
changelog, we have:
| * New upstream release (closes: #685516)
instead, that'd be better:
| * New upstream release:
|- tomcat7 is wheezy (7.0.28) is incompatible with tomcat-native 1.1.23,
| it requires 1.1.24 or higher (Closes: #685516).
That would save everyone a BTS lookup.
No argument there.
tomcat-native version 1.1.24 is compatible with and has been tested
with both tomcat6-6.0.35 and tomcat7-7.0.28. We recognize that the
requesting a new upstream version is typically not permitted during
the freeze, but in this case the differences between upstream versions
aren't extensive and the package is intended for use in conjunction
with tomcat6 and tomcat7 (I am not aware of other uses), so it seems a
shame to release with a version incompatible with tomcat7.
Yep, this one doesn't look too insane. It would have been nice to
include a source debdiff, stripping out the *.html and configure
changes.
((
I hope the latter really is due to just that:
-# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.59.
+# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.68
))
Well, I kind of assumed that folks would look at the debdiff between the
packages (which will necessarily include all of this) anyway.
Out of curiosity, if the primary use is with tomcat6 and tomcat7, how
come it wasn't spotted earlier? What if that version brings subtle
regressions? Will anyone notice/fix in a timely fashion?
The primary (only?) use of tomcat-native is to increase the performance
of tomcat - that is, running some function in native code in the APR
library via a JNI interface. It isn't required for tomcat to function,
but is used in many environments. (I don't use it mine.) As for why it
wasn't spotted earlier, that's an issue with team-maintenance. We're
learning, we're trying, and in the future I'll know to test these as a
suite. If there are subtle regressions, then they'll mostly likely be
reported via the Apache site (or in Debian). I think the possibility of
a regression is preferable to being completely incompatible with
tomcat7. For the lifetime of wheezy, tomcat7 should (will hopefully) be
the predominate server choice. (There was actually talk of dropping
tomcat6 for wheezy for security reason, but we're optimistic that Ubuntu
LTS support will help with the maintenance.)
Looking at the diff (please bear in mind I know little to nothing in
java/jni, so those are naïve questions):
- is tcn_socket_t for internal use only or is it exposed outside the
library?
- same question for tcn_pollset_t.
- is it ok to get rid of some functions, like update_ttl?
If answers are 2*internal+yes, we should be able to unblock it.
Taking a close look at the upstream source diff, I think the changes are
only additive:
These 2 are equivalent:
+TCN_IMPLEMENT_CALL(jint, Poll, add)(TCN_STDARGS, jlong pollset,
+jlong socket, jint reqevents)
-TCN_IMPLEMENT_CALL(jint, Poll, add)(TCN_STDARGS, jlong pollset,
-jlong socket, jint reqevents)
These are new:
+TCN_IMPLEMENT_CALL(jint, Poll, addWithTimeout)(TCN_STDARGS, jlong pollset,
+ jlong socket, jint reqevents,
+ jlong socket_timeout)
+static apr_status_t do_add(tcn_pollset_t *p, tcn_socket_t *s,
+ apr_int16_t reqevents,
+ apr_interval_time_t socket_timeout) {
Here is the change you're referring to:
-static void update_ttl(tcn_pollset_t *p, const apr_pollfd_t *fd, apr_time_t
t)
+static void update_last_active(tcn_pollset_t *p, const apr_pollfd_t *fd,
apr_time_t t)
update_ttl() (and it's replacement, update_last_active()) are only used
in poll.c and is declared as static, so I don't see how that would
change users of the library.
Thank you for your consideration!
tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#683244: Bug#682640: binNMU
On 08/18/2012 05:03 AM, Neil Williams wrote: Just to help those scanning the RC bug lists, the binNMU request for bobcat is #683244. The binNMU for c++-annotations would need to be requested later. I've done a simple test in a pbuilder chroot and the principle of the request does fix these two RC bugs. Hi Neil, Thank you for verifying the proposed binNMU. Any advice on how to proceed with this for bobcat from the maintainer perspective? Thank you, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Please unbock imagemagick 6.7.7.10-4
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 02:18 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote: Could you please unblock imagemagick 6.7.7.10-4 ? It contains a minimal fix (debdiff attached) for fixing a potential DoS vulnerability in testing. Unblocked. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1346130902.12289.23.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#686058: unblock: spamassassin/3.3.2-4
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package spamassassin
spamassassin 3.3.2-4 fixes two r-c packaging bugs and also incorporates
a fix from upstream that causes spamassassin to fail to properly process
certain (potentially intentionally) malformed messages. Details of these
bugs:
683431: spamassassin depends on /usr/share/doc/spamassassin/GPG.KEY, in
violation of policy §12.3.
684373: spamassassin doesn't re-create /var/lib/spamassassin upon
re-install after purge.
684709: the last line of malformed MIME messages is ignored
unblock spamassassin/3.3.2-4
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru spamassassin-3.3.2/debian/changelog
spamassassin-3.3.2/debian/changelog
--- spamassassin-3.3.2/debian/changelog 2012-06-14 23:00:17.0 -0700
+++ spamassassin-3.3.2/debian/changelog 2012-08-13 22:29:36.0 -0700
@@ -1,3 +1,26 @@
+spamassassin (3.3.2-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Incorporate upstream's fix for a bug where malformed multipart MIME
+messages would bypass URIBL rules. (Closes: #684709)
+ * Update standards version to 3.9.3 (no changes)
+
+ -- Noah Meyerhans no...@debian.org Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:37:11 -0700
+
+spamassassin (3.3.2-3.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * debian/spamassassin.postinst: Create /var/lib/spamassassin.
+Closes: #684373.
+
+ -- Bart Martens ba...@debian.org Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:29:42 +
+
+spamassassin (3.3.2-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * move GPG.KEY out of /usr/share/doc per §12.3(Closes: #683431)
+
+ -- Shawn Landden shawnland...@gmail.com Sat, 04 Aug 2012 16:20:46 +
+
spamassassin (3.3.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Run sa-update and sa-compile as a non-root user.
diff -Nru spamassassin-3.3.2/debian/control spamassassin-3.3.2/debian/control
--- spamassassin-3.3.2/debian/control 2012-06-14 23:59:48.0 -0700
+++ spamassassin-3.3.2/debian/control 2012-08-13 22:27:52.0 -0700
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7), perl, libssl-dev,
libhtml-parser-perl (= 3.24), libnet-dns-perl (= 0.34), libnetaddr-ip-perl,
hardening-wrapper
-Standards-Version: 3.9.2
+Standards-Version: 3.9.3
Homepage: http://www.spamassassin.org/
Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-maint/deb-maint/spamassassin/trunk
Vcs-Browser:
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/collab-maint/deb-maint/spamassassin/trunk/
diff -Nru spamassassin-3.3.2/debian/patches/60_bug_684709
spamassassin-3.3.2/debian/patches/60_bug_684709
--- spamassassin-3.3.2/debian/patches/60_bug_684709 1969-12-31
16:00:00.0 -0800
+++ spamassassin-3.3.2/debian/patches/60_bug_684709 2012-08-13
21:36:26.0 -0700
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+Index: spamassassin-3.3.2/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message.pm
+===
+--- spamassassin-3.3.2.orig/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message.pm 2011-06-06
16:59:17.0 -0700
spamassassin-3.3.2/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message.pm2012-08-13
21:36:04.0 -0700
+@@ -794,14 +794,30 @@
+ my $in_body = 0;
+ my $header;
+ my $part_array;
++ my $found_end_boundary;
+
+ my $line_count = @{$body};
+ foreach ( @{$body} ) {
+ # if we're on the last body line, or we find any boundary marker,
+ # deal with the mime part
+-if ( --$line_count == 0 || (defined $boundary
/^--\Q$boundary\E(?:--)?\s*$/) ) {
++$found_end_boundary = defined $boundary /^--\Q$boundary\E(?:--)?\s*$/;
++if ( --$line_count == 0 || $found_end_boundary ) {
+ my $line = $_; # remember the last line
+
++ # If at last line and no end boundary found, the line belongs to body
++ # TODO:
++ # Is $self-{mime_boundary_state}-{$boundary}-- needed here?
++ # Could missing end boundary be a useful rule? Mark it somewhere?
++ # If SA processed truncated message from amavis etc, this could also
++ # be hit legimately..
++ if (!$found_end_boundary) {
++# TODO: This is duplicate code from few pages down below..
++while (length ($_) MAX_BODY_LINE_LENGTH) {
++ push (@{$part_array}, substr($_, 0, MAX_BODY_LINE_LENGTH).\n);
++ substr($_, 0, MAX_BODY_LINE_LENGTH) = '';
++}
++push ( @{$part_array}, $_ );
++ }
+ # per rfc 1521, the CRLF before the boundary is part of the boundary:
+ # NOTE: The CRLF preceding the encapsulation line is conceptually
+ # attached to the boundary so that it is possible to have a part
+@@ -810,7 +826,7 @@
+ # CRLFs preceding the encapsulation line, the first of which is part
+ # of the preceding body part, and the second of which is part of the
+
