Bug#689691: marked as done (unblock: php-letodms-core/3.3.9-1)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:08:41 +0200 with message-id 507a64f9.1030...@thykier.net and subject line Re: Bug#689691: unblock: php-letodms-core/3.3.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #689691, regarding unblock: php-letodms-core/3.3.9-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 689691: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689691 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Subject: unblock: php-letodms-core/3.3.9-1 Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package php-letodms-core The current letodms version in testing (3.3.4-1) has some important security vulnerabilities. New php-letodms-core-3.3.9-1 fixes all these issues. unblock php-letodms-core/3.3.9-1 Thank you, Regards, Francisco. -- Francisco M. García Claramonte Debian GNU/Linux Developer franci...@debian.org GPG: public key ID 556ABA51 http://people.debian.org/~francisco/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 2012-10-08 17:37, Francisco Manuel Garcia Claramonte wrote: Hi Niels, Thanks for your support. I comment below. [...] I have prepared a diff file from my GIT Debian development copy (just local copy). It shows all changes from 3.3.4-1 to 3.3.9-1 [1]. I have prepared another diff file with main changes, removed some unneeded diffs (in files as example), to easy review [2]. And a full debdiff [3] file. Much harder to review. Please tell me if you need anything else, or I can help you in some way. [1] http://people.debian.org/~francisco/letodms/php-letodms-core_3.3.4--3.3.9.git.diff [2] http://people.debian.org/~francisco/letodms/php-letodms-core_3.3.4--3.3.9.git-main_changes.diff [3] http://people.debian.org/~francisco/letodms/php-letodms-core_3.3.4--3.3.9.debdiff Regards, Francisco [1] and [2] where much much better than the full debdiff [3]. Unblocked, thanks. ~Niels---End Message---
Bug#688512: unblock or tpu: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-1
Control: tag -1 pending d-i On 2012-10-06 02:44, Josselin Mouette wrote: I have just uploaded version 2.33.12+really2.32.4-2 because of a security vulnerability: glib2.0 (2.33.12+really2.32.4-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Revert link adding for gdbus-object-manager-example. While it is useful to have in /usr/share/doc as an example, it must not be shipped with the system documentation. * 20_glib-compile-resources_leak.patch: new patch. Fix a leak introduced in version 2.32.4. Thanks Niels Thykier! * SECURITY: add 11_CVE-2012-3524_setuid.patch from upstream. Prevents using DBus in a setuid binary. Fixes CVE-2012-3524. Attached is the diff between -1 and -2. Cheers, Unblock added, unblock-udeb pending d-i approval. Thanks, ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/507a65a6.2090...@thykier.net
Processed: Re: Bug#688512: unblock or tpu: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-1
Processing control commands: tag -1 pending d-i Bug #688512 [release.debian.org] unblock or tpu: glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-1 Added tag(s) d-i and pending. -- 688512: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688512 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b688512.135019870125463.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#689351: unblock: klibc/2.0.1-2
Control: tags -1 pending d-i On 2012-10-01 21:54, maximilian attems wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package klibc Has 3 fixes for armhf RC bug, plus security fix for dash and a fix for x86 cross building. See the diff: [...] Unblocked klibc/2.0.1-3, though unblock-udeb pending d-i approval. Thanks, ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/507a66d5.6010...@thykier.net
Processed: Re: Bug#689351: unblock: klibc/2.0.1-2
Processing control commands: tags -1 pending d-i Bug #689351 [release.debian.org] unblock: klibc/2.0.1-2 Added tag(s) d-i and pending. -- 689351: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689351 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b689351.135019900627372.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#688391: marked as done (unblock: caribou/0.4.4-1)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:27:12 +0200
with message-id 507a6950.1090...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#688391: unblock: caribou/0.4.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #688391,
regarding unblock: caribou/0.4.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
688391: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688391
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock caribou for translation updates and a pair of bugfixes.
caribou (0.4.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Stop overriding OnlyShowIn from upstream. Closes: #679102.
* New upstream translation/bugfix release.
The diff for non-autogenerated parts is attached. (The actual diff is
big because upstream changed the vala compiler version used.)
unblock caribou/0.4.4-1
Thanks,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'
`-
diff -Nru caribou-0.4.2/configure.ac caribou-0.4.4/configure.ac
--- caribou-0.4.2/configure.ac 2012-03-27 04:31:58.0 +0200
+++ caribou-0.4.4/configure.ac 2012-09-03 12:11:56.0 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
AC_PREREQ([2.63])
AC_INIT([caribou],
-[0.4.2],
+[0.4.4],
[https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=caribou],
[caribou])
@@ -104,9 +104,6 @@
dnl == intltool check ==
IT_PROG_INTLTOOL([0.35.0])
-dnl == Documentation ==
-GNOME_DOC_INIT
-
dnl == GObject introspection ==
GOBJECT_INTROSPECTION_REQUIRE([0.10.7])
diff -Nru caribou-0.4.2/data/antler/style.css caribou-0.4.4/data/antler/style.css
--- caribou-0.4.2/data/antler/style.css 2011-09-03 05:36:58.0 +0200
+++ caribou-0.4.4/data/antler/style.css 2012-08-03 15:43:47.0 +0200
@@ -10,10 +10,10 @@
@define-color group_scan_color2 darker(@group_scan_color1);
.antler-keyboard-button {
- border-width: 0;
- border-radius: 2;
- border-image: url(dark-key-border.svg) 2 2 2 2 repeat stretch;
- font: Sans 14;
+ border-width: 0px;
+ border-radius: 2px;
+ border-image: url(dark-key-border.svg) 2px 2px 2px 2px repeat stretch;
+ font: Sans 14px;
background-image: -gtk-gradient (linear,
left top,
left bottom,
diff -Nru caribou-0.4.2/debian/rules caribou-0.4.4/debian/rules
--- caribou-0.4.2/debian/rules 2011-11-21 16:57:04.0 +0100
+++ caribou-0.4.4/debian/rules 2012-06-26 14:17:37.0 +0200
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
install/caribou::
echo NoDisplay=true debian/tmp/usr/share/applications/caribou.desktop
- echo OnlyShowIn=GNOME; debian/tmp/etc/xdg/autostart/caribou-autostart.desktop
DEB_PYTHON2_MODULE_PACKAGES = caribou caribou-antler
diff -Nru caribou-0.4.2/NEWS caribou-0.4.4/NEWS
--- caribou-0.4.2/NEWS 2012-03-27 04:31:46.0 +0200
+++ caribou-0.4.4/NEWS 2012-09-05 11:26:46.0 +0200
@@ -1,4 +1,20 @@
=
+Version 0.4.4
+=
+- Removed unneeded gnome-doc-utils dependency
+- Bug 683256 - caribou unnecessarily requires pygobject 3.3.3 or up to
+ build
+- Translation updates (Galician, Polish, Vietnamese, Marathi,
+ Gujarati, Bengali)
+
+=
+Version 0.4.3
+=
+- Bug 674344: Not using units is deprecated in gtk CSS is deprecated
+- Update after pygobject bug 676746
+- Translation updates (Norwegian, Greek, Traditional Chinese)
+
+=
Version 0.4.2
=
- Build fixes
diff -Nru caribou-0.4.2/tools/make_schema.py caribou-0.4.4/tools/make_schema.py
--- caribou-0.4.2/tools/make_schema.py 2011-09-09 17:42:39.0 +0200
+++ caribou-0.4.4/tools/make_schema.py 2012-09-05 11:17:26.0 +0200
@@ -56,9 +56,19 @@
key.setAttribute('name', setting.gsettings_key)
key.setAttribute('type', setting.variant_type)
schemalist.appendChild(key)
+# pygobject = 3.3.3 and up expose g_variant_print as
+# print_. Older pygobjects expose it as print, which
+# we need to use through getattr as print is a keyword.
+#
+# Try the new name first, fall back to the old one if unavailable.
+#
+# Once we depend on pygobject = 3.4 we can just call
+# setting.gvariant.print_(False) directly.
+printfunc = getattr(setting.gvariant, 'print_', None)
+if printfunc is None:
+printfunc = getattr(setting.gvariant, 'print')
self._append_children_element_value_pairs(
-doc, key, [('default',
-getattr(setting.gvariant, print)(False)),
+
Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 02:19:25PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:43:48 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Or maybe it would be a good idea to add the working pinning setup to the iceweasel package itself, so that people that add backports source will automatically get proper upgrades? Or maybe not, I'm just throwing an idea. What does that even mean? When you have backports in your sources.list, you don't automatically get your upgrades from there. Once you do install one for the first time, subsequent upgrades come from backports. But in the case of iceweasel, version bumps also require new packages for xulrunner and libmozjs, and that prevents automatic upgrades: iceweasel's is kept back by apt. Default apt preferences for the iceweasel packages would ensure stable users that use backports sources will always get the latest. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014074143.ga24...@glandium.org
Bug#690419: unblock: iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceweasel 10.0.8esr-1/10.0.9esr-1 only contain upstream changes, which are security updates for the extended support branch. unblock iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014074511.24785.57313.report...@jigen.glandium.org
Re: Bug#665476: libsasl2-2 - ABI change without changing ABI name
Please revert, this will only break everything around and we don't really want transition sasl right now. The only thing which broke was openldap due some really deep internal library symbols, which are not used anywhere else, and it's already fixed, so I don't think this deserves transition. Debian release might have different opinion though, but if not I suggest to set this as wheezy-ignore. O. On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote: control: tag -1 patch Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/5. Please let me know if I should delay longer. See attached patch. Best wishes, Mike ___ Pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel mailing list pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel -- Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALjhHG-rvBABWLqWsOnMO+pk9hMy_jogu=ypxu0zbpyc6b6...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#665476: libsasl2-2 - ABI change without changing ABI name
And your patch is wrong, you have bumped soname, but left the package name same, which is even more wrong the this subtle breakage in the first place. On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org wrote: Please revert, this will only break everything around and we don't really want transition sasl right now. The only thing which broke was openldap due some really deep internal library symbols, which are not used anywhere else, and it's already fixed, so I don't think this deserves transition. Debian release might have different opinion though, but if not I suggest to set this as wheezy-ignore. O. On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote: control: tag -1 patch Hi, I've uploaded an nmu fixing this issue to delayed/5. Please let me know if I should delay longer. See attached patch. Best wishes, Mike ___ Pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel mailing list pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel -- Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org -- Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caljhhg92fv2bafpoj-sxacrvvsp5exvfshnxrdw2frtwb5b...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#681717: unblock: openjpeg/1.3+dfsg-4.4
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 17:59:37 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: Needing to debug the tools is both a lot more unlikely than debugging the library or something that uses it, and easy enough to build a debug version of the tool (which you need to do anyway to debug). So I don't think this is a problem. Please review the attached patch, and let me know if it is ok to upload to unstable. The security issue is fixed, and the tool binaries are now not excluded from the -dbg package. Go ahead. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dropbear. Uploads 2012.55-1.1 and -1.2 fixed
#630581 which prevented the remote unlock feature to work correctly
on Wheezy. This initramfs hook allows to easily add the possibility to
enter the system encryption passphrase using SSH. It would not be a good
user experience to require admins to recover physical access for these
setups after upgrading to Wheezy.
Thanks for your hard work!
Hint:
unblock dropbear/2012.55-1.2
--
Jérémy Bobbio.''`.
lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism
`. `'`
`-
diff -u dropbear-2012.55/debian/changelog dropbear-2012.55/debian/changelog
--- dropbear-2012.55/debian/changelog
+++ dropbear-2012.55/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+dropbear (2012.55-1.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Unbreak initramfs hook when upgrading from Squeeze.
+
+ -- Jérémy Bobbio lu...@debian.org Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:53:18 +0200
+
+dropbear (2012.55-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Adjust initramfs hook to work with multi-arch. Initial patch by
+Michael Stapelberg. (Closes: #630581)
+
+ -- Jérémy Bobbio lu...@debian.org Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:17:06 +0200
+
dropbear (2012.55-1) unstable; urgency=high
* New upstream release.
diff -u dropbear-2012.55/debian/initramfs/dropbear-hook dropbear-2012.55/debian/initramfs/dropbear-hook
--- dropbear-2012.55/debian/initramfs/dropbear-hook
+++ dropbear-2012.55/debian/initramfs/dropbear-hook
@@ -27,7 +27,11 @@
else
rm -f ${DESTDIR}/sbin/dropbear
copy_exec /usr/sbin/dropbear /sbin/
- cp /lib/libnss_* ${DESTDIR}/lib/
+ LIBC_DIR=$(ldd /usr/sbin/dropbear | sed -n -e 's,.* = \(/lib.*\)/libc\.so\..*,\1,p')
+ for so in $(find ${LIBC_DIR} -name 'libnss_compat*'); do
+ copy_exec ${so} ${LIBC_DIR}
+ done
+ echo 'passwd: compat' ${DESTDIR}/etc/nsswitch.conf
echo root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/sh ${DESTDIR}/etc/passwd
for keytype in dss rsa; do
if [ ! -f /etc/initramfs-tools/etc/dropbear/dropbear_${keytype}_host_key ]; then
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#690424: unblock: node/0.3.2-7.2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package node
I've just uploaded an NMU which implements only the changes requested
by the TC for the rename to stop the clash with nodejs. Reviewed
already by several folks at a BSP here. Please unblock.
unblock node/0.3.2-7.2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -u node-0.3.2/Makefile node-0.3.2/Makefile
--- node-0.3.2/Makefile
+++ node-0.3.2/Makefile
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
installbin: all
install -m 755 -o root -g root -d $(prefix)$(SBIN_DIR)
- install -m 4755 -s -o root -g root node $(prefix)$(SBIN_DIR)
+ install -m 4755 -s -o root -g root node $(prefix)$(SBIN_DIR)/ax25-node
install -m 755 -s -o root -g root nodeusers $(prefix)$(SBIN_DIR)
installhelp:
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
install -m 644-o bin -g bin man/node.conf.5 $(prefix)$(MAN_DIR)/man5
install -m 644-o bin -g bin man/node.perms.5 $(prefix)$(MAN_DIR)/man5
install -m 755 -o root -g root -d $(prefix)$(MAN_DIR)/man8
- install -m 644-o bin -g bin man/node.8 $(prefix)$(MAN_DIR)/man8
+ install -m 644-o bin -g bin man/node.8 $(prefix)$(MAN_DIR)/man8/ax25-node.8
clean:
rm -f *.o *~ *.bak *.orig
diff -u node-0.3.2/debian/rules node-0.3.2/debian/rules
--- node-0.3.2/debian/rules
+++ node-0.3.2/debian/rules
@@ -42,8 +42,13 @@
dh_installdirs
# Add here commands to install the package into debian/node.
- $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/node/
+ $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/ax25-node/
+ # Set up symlinks in the transitional package
+ mkdir -p debian/node/usr/sbin
+ ln -s ax25-node debian/node/usr/sbin/node
+ mkdir -p debian/node/usr/share/man/man8
+ ln -s ax25-node.8 debian/node/usr/share/man/man8/node.8
# Build architecture-independent files here.
binary-indep: build install
@@ -61,7 +66,7 @@
# dh_installpam
# dh_installinit
# dh_installcron
- dh_installmanpages
+ dh_installmanpages -p ax25-node
# dh_installinfo
# dh_undocumented
dh_installchangelogs
diff -u node-0.3.2/debian/control node-0.3.2/debian/control
--- node-0.3.2/debian/control
+++ node-0.3.2/debian/control
@@ -9,8 +9,17 @@
-Package: node
+Package: ax25-node
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, update-inetd, openbsd-inetd|inet-superserver
Description: Amateur Packet Radio Node program
- The node program accepts TCP/IP and packet radio network connections and
+ The ax25-node program accepts TCP/IP and packet radio network connections and
presents users with an interface that allows them to make gateway connections
to remote hosts using a variety of amateur radio protocols.
+Package: node
+Priority: extra
+Architecture: all
+Depends: ax25-node
+Conflicts: nodejs-legacy
+Section: oldlibs
+Description: Amateur Packet Radio Node program (transitional package)
+ The existing node package has been renamed to ax25-node. This transitional
+ package exists to ease the upgrade path for existing users.
diff -u node-0.3.2/debian/changelog node-0.3.2/debian/changelog
--- node-0.3.2/debian/changelog
+++ node-0.3.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+node (0.3.2-7.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * NMU
+ * Implement the tech committee decision to fix the node/nodejs name
+clash (Closes: #681361):
++ Rename the existing node binary package to ax25-node
++ Rename the /usr/sbin/node binary in that package to
+ /usr/sbin/ax25-node
++ Add a new node transitional package which depends on ax25-node
+ and conflicts with nodejs-legacy.
+
+ -- Steve McIntyre 93...@debian.org Sun, 14 Oct 2012 00:37:37 +0100
+
node (0.3.2-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Retiring - remove myself from the uploaders list.
reverted:
--- node-0.3.2/debian/postinst
+++ node-0.3.2.orig/debian/postinst
@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
-#! /bin/sh
-# postinst script for node
-#
-# see: dh_installdeb(1)
-
-set -e
-
-# summary of how this script can be called:
-#* postinst `configure' most-recently-configured-version
-#* old-postinst `abort-upgrade' new version
-#* conflictor's-postinst `abort-remove' `in-favour' package
-# new-version
-#* deconfigured's-postinst `abort-deconfigure' `in-favour'
-# failed-install-package version `removing'
-# conflicting-package version
-# for details, see /usr/share/doc/packaging-manual/
-#
-# quoting from the policy:
-# Any necessary prompting should almost always be confined to the
-# post-installation script, and should be protected with a conditional
-# so that unnecessary prompting doesn't happen if a package's
-# installation fails and the `postinst' is called with `abort-upgrade',
-# `abort-remove' or `abort-deconfigure'.
-
-case $1 in
-
Bug#690419: marked as done (unblock: iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 12:12:50 +0200 with message-id 20121014101250.gb17...@radis.cristau.org and subject line Re: Bug#690419: unblock: iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #690419, regarding unblock: iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 690419: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690419 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceweasel 10.0.8esr-1/10.0.9esr-1 only contain upstream changes, which are security updates for the extended support branch. unblock iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 09:45:11 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package iceweasel 10.0.8esr-1/10.0.9esr-1 only contain upstream changes, which are security updates for the extended support branch. unblock iceweasel/10.0.9esr-1 Hint added. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Re: Bug#687402: beanstalkd: proposed TPU (diff for NMU version 1.4.6-3.1)
On 13.10.2012 23:15, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:19:24PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 13.10.2012 20:22, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: Dear RMs, here's an almost identical patch (also, dropping -i as it's also deprecated, and adding VCS headers). On the whole, this looks fine; thanks. However: + * Bump up Standards-Version to 3.9.4 The d-d-a mail announcing the release of policy 3.9.4 specifically asked people *not* to do that. oh sorry about that; will upload with S-V set to 3.9.3 then. You could just have not bumped it at all instead. ;-) Approve hint added. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/c6447bb49b7dd8b40d0e5692a9635...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#685960: unblock: gnupg/1.4.12-6
Please unblock gnupg/1.4.12-6 The last upload did not fix #685627 as it did not trigger a rebuild of the .gmo file(s). The upload of gnupg/1.4.12-6 will fix that. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1350209845.6339.2.ca...@haktar.debian.wgdd.de
Re: Bug#665476: libsasl2-2 - ABI change without changing ABI name
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:29:21 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: Please revert, this will only break everything around and we don't really want transition sasl right now. Agreed that this patch is not acceptable. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RC-ness of incomplete copyright files
Quoting Michael Gilbert (mgilb...@debian.org): Hi, Jakub Wilk has been filing a lot of RC bugs on packages with incomplete copyright files. Some examples: http://bugs.debian.org/690394 http://bugs.debian.org/690371 http://bugs.debian.org/690370 Now, these are mostly easy fixes and of course in the end completeness is useful, but with so many packages embedding so much code from various sources, I think in the end we're going to find most of the archive affected. So, I'm wondering if the release team's opinion concurs with serious severity, or if these can be downgraded to important to avoid further delaying wheezy? Not wearing a release team hat, but it is my feeling that such deep nitpicking is certainly wished in the long termbut also helps very well in delaying the release of wheezy. No offense intended to Jakub's work, far from that. We certainly need people doing such archive-wide reviews of things that are often neglected. But we also need to *release* from time to time.otherwise the prediction hidden in one of my latest blog posts (http://www.perrier.eu.org/weblog/2012/10/09#69) will be more and more true. It is probably not the moment anymore to do archive-wide mass bug filing with RC severity except for FTBFS issues. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:44:33 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package dropbear. Uploads 2012.55-1.1 and -1.2 fixed #630581 which prevented the remote unlock feature to work correctly on Wheezy. This initramfs hook allows to easily add the possibility to enter the system encryption passphrase using SSH. It would not be a good user experience to require admins to recover physical access for these setups after upgrading to Wheezy. What guarantees that dropbear owns /etc/passwd and /etc/nsswitch.conf inside the initramfs, and that it's not stomping on some other package's stuff? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#683323: unblock: python-apt/0.8.7
2012/9/3 Michael Vogt m...@debian.org: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 01:24:24PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:10:17PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: ke, 2012-08-08 kello 01:50 +0200, Cyril Brulebois kirjoitti: Julian Andres Klode j...@debian.org (30/07/2012): Since the version of testing, this contains mostly bug fixes and many translation updates, but also (starting with 0.8.5) one new module (apt.auth) which is a cleaned up version of an internal software-properties module (and not used by any code in unstable AFAIK). Then I'm not sure we need or want this new module in wheezy… Should this new module be rolled back and a new python-apt release produced just for Wheezy, then? How about adding a warning to the module that it is experimental? I'd like to avoid rolling back stuff we already have in newer. Otherwise, we could upload a 0.8.8 with a disabled module as well, but that might create problems later on with merging Ubuntu packages that depend on python-apt (= 0.8.5) and expect apt.auth to be there. We could also create a 0.8.4.1 release for testing, by branching off unstable's 0.8.7, merging the changelog entries for 0.8.5, 0.8.6, and 0.8.7 into 0.8.4.1, and removing apt.auth mentions, and disabling or removing that module. But that is a bit more work. We could also name 0.8.4.1 as 0.8.4+wheezy1, but given that unstable is past 0.8.4 already, just using 0.8.4.X instead of 0.8.4+wheezyX seems a bit nicer. I created a branch at http://anonscm.debian.org/bzr/bzr/apt/python-apt/debian-wheezy/ that is based on the debian-sid branch but disables auth.py. I am happy to upload this to wheezy if that approach is approved by the release team. Release Team: A separate branch was created for Wheezy and a debdiff submitted. Is there anything else missing to move this issue forward and achieve a concensus about what will be allowed into Testing? Regards, Martin-Éric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/capzxpqfl645_hax3aem5tdxaksqbgm0nppp0vcn4bsbfpda...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:44:12PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: Please unblock package dropbear. Uploads 2012.55-1.1 and -1.2 fixed #630581 which prevented the remote unlock feature to work correctly on Wheezy. This initramfs hook allows to easily add the possibility to enter the system encryption passphrase using SSH. It would not be a good user experience to require admins to recover physical access for these setups after upgrading to Wheezy. What guarantees that dropbear owns /etc/passwd and /etc/nsswitch.conf inside the initramfs, and that it's not stomping on some other package's stuff? This unblock request is about fixing an upgrade issue. As far as I know, no bugs have ever been reported against dropbear about preventing other package's hooks to work. If dropbear was stomping on some feet, it was already doing it in Squeeze. If you have suggestions on how to get the guarantees you seek, I'd be happy to hear them. But I don't think thriving for perfect should leave user systems unbootable (or hard to boot). -- Jérémy Bobbio.''`. lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 13:02:12 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:44:12PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: Please unblock package dropbear. Uploads 2012.55-1.1 and -1.2 fixed #630581 which prevented the remote unlock feature to work correctly on Wheezy. This initramfs hook allows to easily add the possibility to enter the system encryption passphrase using SSH. It would not be a good user experience to require admins to recover physical access for these setups after upgrading to Wheezy. What guarantees that dropbear owns /etc/passwd and /etc/nsswitch.conf inside the initramfs, and that it's not stomping on some other package's stuff? This unblock request is about fixing an upgrade issue. As far as I know, no bugs have ever been reported against dropbear about preventing other package's hooks to work. If dropbear was stomping on some feet, it was already doing it in Squeeze. Touching nsswitch.conf is new in your patch afaict. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2
Also, fuck Gerrit's mail bouncing with C/R crap. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#685597: marked as done (unblock: ppl/0.11.2-8)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 12:19:18 +0100 with message-id 61813d4ea4746ba53bc743a895350...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#685597: unblock: ppl/0.11.2-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #685597, regarding unblock: ppl/0.11.2-8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 685597: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685597 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock unblock to fix #669479, #680896 for wheezy. the split out ppl-config binary is not used by apron and cloog-ppl, so no changes for build dependencies in other packages are needed. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 13.10.2012 23:30, Philipp Kern wrote: On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 08:09:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 12:07 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: unblock to fix #669479, #680896 for wheezy. the split out ppl-config binary is not used by apron and cloog-ppl, so no changes for build dependencies in other packages are needed. Has it been verified that they build correctly against a multi-arched libppl? Both have built successfully on zelenka against the following libppl: ii libppl-c4:s390 0.11.2-8 s390 Parma Polyhedra Library (C interface) ii libppl0.11-dev:s390 0.11.2-8 s390 Parma Polyhedra Library (development) ii libppl9:s390 0.11.2-8 s390 Parma Polyhedra Library (runtime library) Unblocked. Regards, Adam---End Message---
Bug#690440: unblock: libpst 0.6.54-4.1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, Please unblock libpst; the NMU from Gregor is pending upload for PowerPC and then it will be eligible. His NMU diff is attached. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 diff -Nru libpst-0.6.54/debian/changelog libpst-0.6.54/debian/changelog --- libpst-0.6.54/debian/changelog 2012-06-30 19:58:51.0 +0200 +++ libpst-0.6.54/debian/changelog 2012-09-30 19:12:46.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +libpst (0.6.54-4.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5): +readpst: fix directory to symlink upgrade in postinst. +(Closes: #687879) + + -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Sun, 30 Sep 2012 19:12:22 +0200 + libpst (0.6.54-4) unstable; urgency=low [ Jordi Mallach ] diff -Nru libpst-0.6.54/debian/readpst.postinst libpst-0.6.54/debian/readpst.postinst --- libpst-0.6.54/debian/readpst.postinst 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ libpst-0.6.54/debian/readpst.postinst 2012-09-30 19:19:33.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +#!/bin/sh +set -e + +# Replace documentation directory with symlink +docdir=/usr/share/doc/readpst +if [ -d $docdir ] [ ! -L $docdir ]; then +if rmdir $docdir 2/dev/null; then +ln -sf pst-utils $docdir +fi +fi + +#DEBHELPER# + +exit 0 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#690423: unblock: dropbear/2012.55-1.2
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 01:17:33PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 13:02:12 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:44:12PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: Please unblock package dropbear. Uploads 2012.55-1.1 and -1.2 fixed #630581 which prevented the remote unlock feature to work correctly on Wheezy. This initramfs hook allows to easily add the possibility to enter the system encryption passphrase using SSH. It would not be a good user experience to require admins to recover physical access for these setups after upgrading to Wheezy. What guarantees that dropbear owns /etc/passwd and /etc/nsswitch.conf inside the initramfs, and that it's not stomping on some other package's stuff? This unblock request is about fixing an upgrade issue. As far as I know, no bugs have ever been reported against dropbear about preventing other package's hooks to work. If dropbear was stomping on some feet, it was already doing it in Squeeze. Touching nsswitch.conf is new in your patch afaict. Would you like me to perform another upload removing the line creating /etc/nsswitch.conf? I don't really see the need, but it can surely be done. -- Jérémy Bobbio.''`. lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Fixing the Catalyst development environment in Wheezy
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:07:24 +0200 intrigeri intrig...@debian.org wrote: the Catalyst development environment is seriously broken and currently in Debian current testing/sid (to get and idea, see #683656, #680819, #680829, #680826, #665222). Agreed. We, Debian Perl Group, would like to fix that, and we have been working on it during DebCamp and DebConf accordingly. Sorry for the delay since then. Scope: three currently buggy packages are directly under the radar as far as freeze block/unblock decisions are concerned (libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl, libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl and libcatalyst-perl), and a few others are directly concerned due to being broken by the versions of libcatalyst-perl currently in testing and unstable. The diffs supplied originally in August are likely to be too large to be acceptable as unblocks and I've been wondering about an alternative solution for Wheezy. An alternative solution would be: 0: RM libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl | 0.15-1 | source, all Checking reverse dependencies... No dependency problem found. Removal of libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl possible. Closes: #680829 (Severity: serious) 1: RM libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl | 0.06-1 | source, all Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Build-Depends: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl Dependency problem found. Dependency problem goes away due to 0: Removal of libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl possible. Closes: #680819 (Severity: serious) 2: RM libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl | 0.10-1 | source, all Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Depends: gitalist: gitalist-common # Broken Build-Depends: gitalist: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl (= 0.07) Dependency problem found. gitalist: $ rmadison gitalist gitalist | 0.003006+dfsg-2 | sid | source $ bts select source:gitalist severity:grave severity:serious 681435 665223 Removal of libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl possible. Closes: #680843 3: RM gitalist gitalist | 0.003006+dfsg-2 | source gitalist-common | 0.003006+dfsg-2 | all gitalist-fastcgi | 0.003006+dfsg-2 | all Checking reverse dependencies... No dependency problem found. Closes: #681435 Closes: #665223 Not in testing. Worth removing from unstable? - update libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl to 0.17 (compatibility bugfix -only release) Instead: RM - update libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl to 0.07 (compatibility bugfix -only release) Instead: RM + libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl, possibly remove gitalist from unstable. I'll file the three RM bugs against release.debian.org (for removal from testing only) later today. I haven't decided whether it's worth removing gitalist at this stage. The one problematic bug is #680826 in libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl | 0.57-1 | source, all Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Depends: libcatalyst-modules-perl: libcatalyst-modules-perl # Broken Build-Depends: gitalist: libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl libcatalyst-modules-perl: libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl libcatalyst-plugin-unicode-encoding-perl: libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl libmojomojo-perl: libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl gitalist isn't a problem, libcatalyst-modules-perl and libmojomojo-perl are problems for fixing #680826. However, the original email to debian-release did not cover how that particular bug was to be fixed either. http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/08/msg01479.html -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpboIuxC3cCc.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#690440: marked as done (unblock: libpst 0.6.54-4.1)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:07:59 +0100 with message-id 102ebeee0ec4f989dfadc729dfdf3...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#690440: unblock: libpst 0.6.54-4.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #690440, regarding unblock: libpst 0.6.54-4.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 690440: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690440 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, Please unblock libpst; the NMU from Gregor is pending upload for PowerPC and then it will be eligible. His NMU diff is attached. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 diff -Nru libpst-0.6.54/debian/changelog libpst-0.6.54/debian/changelog --- libpst-0.6.54/debian/changelog 2012-06-30 19:58:51.0 +0200 +++ libpst-0.6.54/debian/changelog 2012-09-30 19:12:46.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +libpst (0.6.54-4.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5): +readpst: fix directory to symlink upgrade in postinst. +(Closes: #687879) + + -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Sun, 30 Sep 2012 19:12:22 +0200 + libpst (0.6.54-4) unstable; urgency=low [ Jordi Mallach ] diff -Nru libpst-0.6.54/debian/readpst.postinst libpst-0.6.54/debian/readpst.postinst --- libpst-0.6.54/debian/readpst.postinst 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ libpst-0.6.54/debian/readpst.postinst 2012-09-30 19:19:33.0 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +#!/bin/sh +set -e + +# Replace documentation directory with symlink +docdir=/usr/share/doc/readpst +if [ -d $docdir ] [ ! -L $docdir ]; then +if rmdir $docdir 2/dev/null; then +ln -sf pst-utils $docdir +fi +fi + +#DEBHELPER# + +exit 0 signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 14.10.2012 12:52, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Please unblock libpst; the NMU from Gregor is pending upload for PowerPC and then it will be eligible. His NMU diff is attached. Unblocked. Regards, Adam---End Message---
Bug#690442: unblock: cairo-5c/1.8.1
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock cairo-5c/1.8.1. This upload is no rocket science at all, just
removing all the past release files from the package.
It would help, if the package would be packaged an an upstream package, using
-debian release version.
cairo-5c (1.8.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer Upload.
* Repack 1.8 without including all the binary and source files
of all previous releases. Closes: #688056.
* Update config.{guess,sub}. Closes: #536837.
* Set package section to libs.
* Build with hardening flags.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/507aadce.3070...@debian.org
Bug#690443: RM: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl/0.15-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment and to close RC bug #680829, I feel it is necessary to remove libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl from testing. libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl | 0.15-1 | source, all Checking reverse dependencies... No dependency problem found. The other parts of this fix relate to libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl and libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl for which I am filing RM bugs as well. Full rationale: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/10/msg00677.html Please remove libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl from testing. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: armel i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014122906.17649.1300.reportbug@sylvester.codehelp
Bug#690442: marked as done (unblock: cairo-5c/1.8.1)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:28:57 +0100
with message-id 3487a849f110d468597f7dfbc8653...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#690442: unblock: cairo-5c/1.8.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690442,
regarding unblock: cairo-5c/1.8.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
690442: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690442
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock cairo-5c/1.8.1. This upload is no rocket science at all, just
removing all the past release files from the package.
It would help, if the package would be packaged an an upstream package, using
-debian release version.
cairo-5c (1.8.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer Upload.
* Repack 1.8 without including all the binary and source files
of all previous releases. Closes: #688056.
* Update config.{guess,sub}. Closes: #536837.
* Set package section to libs.
* Build with hardening flags.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 14.10.2012 13:19, Matthias Klose wrote:
Please unblock cairo-5c/1.8.1. This upload is no rocket science at
all, just
removing all the past release files from the package.
Unblocked earlier today; thanks.
Regards,
Adam---End Message---
Bug#690446: RM: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl/0.06-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment and to close RC bug #680819, I feel it is necessary to remove libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl from testing. libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl | 0.06-1 | source, all Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Build-Depends: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl Dependency problem found. I've also asked for removal of libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl in #690443, so this dependency problem goes away. The other parts of this fix relate to libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl for which I am will be filing an RM bug as well. Full rationale: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/10/msg00677.html Please remove libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl from testing. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: armel i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014123959.18219.4713.reportbug@sylvester.codehelp
Re: RC-ness of incomplete copyright files
* Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org) [121014 12:44]: Quoting Michael Gilbert (mgilb...@debian.org): Hi, Jakub Wilk has been filing a lot of RC bugs on packages with incomplete copyright files. Some examples: http://bugs.debian.org/690394 http://bugs.debian.org/690371 http://bugs.debian.org/690370 Now, these are mostly easy fixes and of course in the end completeness is useful, but with so many packages embedding so much code from various sources, I think in the end we're going to find most of the archive affected. So, I'm wondering if the release team's opinion concurs with serious severity, or if these can be downgraded to important to avoid further delaying wheezy? Not wearing a release team hat, but it is my feeling that such deep nitpicking is certainly wished in the long termbut also helps very well in delaying the release of wheezy. No offense intended to Jakub's work, far from that. We certainly need people doing such archive-wide reviews of things that are often neglected. Basically setting an bug to RC grade means: It is better to delay the release of Debian (or remove this package) then to ship as it is. If the bug is already present in stable, an minor error in the copyright file shouldn't mean that as we're not making anything worse. If the bug is new, and it is an real issue (like the copyright file saying this code is public domain, but in reality it is GPL3), then it sounds RC grade to me. If it is rather an minor glitch, then indeed it still should be fixed, but it's not serious enough to stop the release, i.e. the severity should be important. (I had always translated serious with we cannot do that, and important with we should be really ashamed. That worked very well.) Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014124827.gi26...@mails.so.argh.org
Bug#690447: unblock: libphone-ui/1:0.0.1+git20110825-2.1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock this NMU, uploaded to delayed/2. There is an nmudiff in the bug #690150. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 directhex i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8-10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#690448: RM: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl/0.10-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment and to close RC bug #680843, I feel it is necessary to remove libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl from testing. libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl | 0.10-1 | source, all Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Depends: gitalist: gitalist-common # Broken Build-Depends: gitalist: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl (= 0.07) Dependency problem found. gitalist: $ rmadison gitalist gitalist | 0.003006+dfsg-2 | sid | source $ bts select source:gitalist severity:grave severity:serious 681435 665223 So removing libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl from testing does not affect gitalist and there are no other dependency issues in testing. The other parts of this fix relate to libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl and libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl for which I have filed RM bugs as well. Full rationale: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/10/msg00677.html Please remove libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl from testing. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: armel i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014125131.18788.16766.reportbug@sylvester.codehelp
Bug#690457: RM: twidge/1.0.8.1+nmu1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm twidge needs to be migrated to a modified hoauth API but the RC bug #665254 has had no maintainer input since it was opened in March. (Maintainer is also upstream.) Please remove twidge from testing. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: armel i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014143243.21077.39863.reportbug@sylvester.codehelp
Re: Fixing the Catalyst development environment in Wheezy
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:07:25 +0100, Neil Williams wrote: The diffs supplied originally in August are likely to be too large to be acceptable as unblocks and I've been wondering about an alternative solution for Wheezy. Thanks for looking into this; but I'd rather have an opinion from the release team before we start to remove half of Catalyst from wheezy (and leaving the other half in a broken state). The one problematic bug is #680826 in libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl I don't think so ... gitalist isn't a problem, libcatalyst-modules-perl and libmojomojo-perl are problems for fixing #680826. However, the original email to debian-release did not cover how that particular bug was to be fixed either. http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/08/msg01479.html ... because it builds fine against the new Catalyst: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680826#13 (also mentioned in the above mail) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: R.E.M.: All The Way To Reno signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#689361: marked as done (unblock: at-spi2-atk/2.5.3-2)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:03:10 +0100
with message-id 490cce03024190b85d6e541815595...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689361: unblock: at-spi2-atk/2.5.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #689361,
regarding unblock: at-spi2-atk/2.5.3-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
689361: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689361
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
Please unblock package at-spi2-atk
unblock at-spi2-atk/2.5.3-2
Upstream has fixed a lot of reference leaks (which would translate into
memory leaks in applications, including long-running ones such as the
desktop). These are recorded in patches/leak*.
In addition, bug #688094 shows that at-spi2-atk leaves a lot of sockets
in the user's home directory, and even root-owned ones for gksu
applications. This is mitigated by the two upstream fixes recorded in
patches/socket*
Lastly, there are a couple translation updates in patches/lv and
patches/pl
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.0.4 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--
Samuel
m argh, pi est plus grand que 2. Ca casse tout
-+- #ens-mim -+-
diff -Nru at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/changelog at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/changelog
--- at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/changelog 2012-06-29 04:35:37.0 +0200
+++ at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/changelog 2012-09-30 17:46:16.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+at-spi2-atk (2.5.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * patches/leak*: Cherry-pick from upstream: fix reference leaks.
+ * patches/socket*: Cherry-pick from upstream: mitigate at-spi socket
+creation. (Closes: #688094)
+ * patches/lv: Cherry-pick from upstream: lv translation update.
+ * patches/pl: Cherry-pick from upstream: pl translation update.
+
+ -- Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org Sun, 30 Sep 2012 16:28:06 +0200
+
at-spi2-atk (2.5.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Samuel Thibault ]
diff -Nru at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak1
at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak1
--- at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak1 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
+0100
+++ at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak1 2012-09-30 17:30:26.0
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+commit e4a899792e389b9d733f1a74702a8f4158f93acc
+Author: Cosimo Cecchi cosi...@gnome.org
+Date: Mon Jul 2 16:14:12 2012 -0400
+
+atk-adaptor: plug a refcount leak
+
+https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679285
+
+diff --git a/atk-adaptor/adaptors/accessible-adaptor.c
b/atk-adaptor/adaptors/accessible-adaptor.c
+index 25d7823..77aacbb 100644
+--- a/atk-adaptor/adaptors/accessible-adaptor.c
b/atk-adaptor/adaptors/accessible-adaptor.c
+@@ -337,6 +337,8 @@ impl_GetRelationSet (DBusConnection * bus,
+ }
+ dbus_message_iter_close_container (iter, iter_array);
+ oom:
++ if (set)
++g_object_unref (set);
+ // TODO: handle out of memory */
+ return reply;
+ }
+
diff -Nru at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak2
at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak2
--- at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak2 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
+0100
+++ at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak2 2012-09-30 17:30:31.0
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+commit 246c99e7f62d5009d5bd4b09c491b74afddae9a6
+Author: Cosimo Cecchi cosi...@gnome.org
+Date: Mon Jul 2 16:14:48 2012 -0400
+
+atk-adaptor: plug a refcount leak
+
+https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679285
+
+diff --git a/atk-adaptor/event.c b/atk-adaptor/event.c
+index d19f451..1cbda23 100644
+--- a/atk-adaptor/event.c
b/atk-adaptor/event.c
+@@ -1017,6 +1017,7 @@ children_changed_event_listener (GSignalInvocationHint *
signal_hint,
+ detail1);
+ emit_event (accessible, ITF_EVENT_OBJECT, name, minor, detail1, detail2,
+ (so), ao, append_object);
++ g_object_unref (ao);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+
diff -Nru at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak3
at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak3
--- at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak3 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
+0100
+++ at-spi2-atk-2.5.3/debian/patches/leak3 2012-09-30 17:30:34.0
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+commit
Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm blcr is not usable with kernel version 2.6.39 or later (see bug #638339). It will probably be fixed upstream at some point, but it cannot now be released in wheezy. Therefore please remove from testing only. Ben. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.2.32-rc1+ (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014150942.28672.19984.report...@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk
Bug#689156: marked as done (unblock: mediawiki/1:1.19.2-2)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:15:41 +0100
with message-id 1b9f97b0150ff0bcaf2b304389b0e...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689156: unblock: mediawiki/1:1.19.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #689156,
regarding unblock: mediawiki/1:1.19.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
689156: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689156
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mediawiki
This upload follows on both the threads for better MW 1.19 support
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.release/56559
and the multiple security issues (Debian #686330) part:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.secure-testing.general/5325
The changes can be split into multiple parts. The security issues
were fixed by the new upstream version, which I’ll detail below.
First are the changes inside debian/ which I’ll show as diffs
between the _patched_ sources again (like with mksh) because
diffs between 3.0 (quilt) diffs are harder to read, except:
The file debian/patches/texvc_location.patch was removed, but it
was already not used in 1.19.1-1. The following patches were added
and have been attached to this message and removed from the diff:
fix_invalid_xhtml.patch, fix_warnings.patch
First, the packaging changes: add myself to Uploaders; do not
replace the jquery-tablesorter shipped with MW by the one in
Debian again because the MW one is a different/patched codebase
(fixes #687519); update Breaks wrt. the isochronal uploads of
src:fusionforge and src:mediawiki-exensions (for which I’ll also
file an unblock request); and Jonathan had added two Recommends.
I added a few “chmod +x” to quieten lintian and removed a COPYING
file from the .deb file after verifying its contents were already
in debian/copyright (which they were).
--- mediawiki-1.19.2-0/debian/changelog 2012-06-18 17:17:26.0 +0200
+++ mediawiki-1.19.2-1/debian/changelog 2012-09-20 13:45:26.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,26 @@
+mediawiki (1:1.19.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Thorsten Glaser ]
+ * New upstream: security fixes for CVE-2012-4377, CVE-2012-4378,
+CVE-2012-4379, CVE-2012-4380, CVE-2012-4381, CVE-2012-4382
+(Closes: #686330)
+ * Prevent table/table without any tr / inside, globally
+ * Fix more cases of not checking $wgHtml5
+ * MW’s ID (XML) sanitiser is there for a reason, use it!
+ * Prevent ul/ul without any li / inside in MonoBook
+ * Fix invalid XHTML caused by code not honouring $wgHtml5
+ * Quell some PHP warnings from sloppy code
+ * Do the wfSuppressWarnings patch used with FusionForge right
+ * Add myself to Uploaders and quieten lintian a bit
+ * Do not replace patched jquery-tablesorter with unpatched one;
+unbreaks sortable tables (Closes: #687519)
+ * Update versioned Breaks against fusionforge and mw-extensions
+
+ [ Jonathan Wiltshire ]
+ * Add Recommends on mediawiki-extensions-base and php-wikidiff2
+
+ -- Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:40:12 +0200
+
mediawiki (1:1.19.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream bug fix release
--- mediawiki-1.19.2-0/debian/control 2012-06-18 16:31:31.0 +0200
+++ mediawiki-1.19.2-1/debian/control 2012-09-20 13:45:26.0 +0200
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Source: mediawiki
Section: web
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Mediawiki Maintenance Team
pkg-mediawiki-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
-Uploaders: Romain Beauxis to...@rastageeks.org, Jonathan Wiltshire
j...@debian.org
+Uploaders: Romain Beauxis to...@rastageeks.org, Jonathan Wiltshire
j...@debian.org, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9),
dh-buildinfo,
ocaml-nox | ocaml, xsltproc, docbook-xml, docbook-xsl, po-debconf
@@ -13,10 +13,19 @@ Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/views
Package: mediawiki
Architecture: all
-Depends: apache2 | httpd, php5, php5-mysql | php5-pgsql | php5-sqlite,
mime-support, libjs-jquery, libjs-jquery-tipsy, libjs-jquery-cookie,
libjs-jquery-form, libjs-jquery-tablesorter, ${misc:Depends}
-Recommends: mysql-server | postgresql-contrib, php5-cli, python
+Depends: apache2 | httpd, php5, php5-mysql | php5-pgsql | php5-sqlite,
mime-support, libjs-jquery, libjs-jquery-tipsy, libjs-jquery-cookie,
libjs-jquery-form, ${misc:Depends}
+Recommends: mysql-server | postgresql-contrib, php5-cli, python,
php-wikidiff2, mediawiki-extensions-base
Suggests: imagemagick | php5-gd, mediawiki-math, memcached, clamav
Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 14.10.2012 16:09, Ben Hutchings wrote: blcr is not usable with kernel version 2.6.39 or later (see bug #638339). It will probably be fixed upstream at some point, but it cannot now be released in wheezy. Therefore please remove from testing only. As mentioned at the BSP, the library has several reverse dependencies. Do we know whether dropping the kernel module and keeping the libraries would work? (CCing the maintainer). # Broken Depends: gromacs: gromacs-mpich [amd64 armel i386 powerpc] hdf5: libhdf5-mpich2-7 [amd64 armel i386 powerpc] meep-lam4: libmeep-lam4-6 [amd64] meep-lam4 [amd64] meep-mpi-default: libmeep-mpi-default6 [amd64] meep-mpi-default [amd64] meep-mpich2: libmeep-mpich2-6 [amd64 armel i386 powerpc] meep-mpich2 [amd64 armel i386 powerpc] mpich2: libmpich2-3 [amd64 armel i386 powerpc] libmpich2-dev [amd64 armel i386 powerpc] mpich2 [amd64 armel i386 powerpc] netpipe: netpipe-mpich2 [amd64 armel i386 powerpc] openmpi: openmpi-checkpoint [amd64 armel i386 powerpc] python-scientific: mpich2python [amd64 armel i386 powerpc] yorick: yorick-mpy-mpich2 [amd64 armel i386 powerpc] # Broken Build-Depends: mpich2: libcr-dev openmpi: libcr-dev Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5305e860002cdbc4d26b67f20b164...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing
Processing control commands: tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #690458 [release.debian.org] RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 690458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690458 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b690458.1350228408668.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#690461: RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm freecad contains GPLv2 code and links to OCTPL (non-GPL-compatible) libraries (bug #617613)/ This is supposed to be fixed soon as there is a new version of libopencascade under a BSD licence http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617613#153. Since the relicensed libopencascade is not available in Debian and probably will not get into wheezy, I think freecad should be removed from stable and testing. Ben. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: amd64 Kernel: Linux 3.2.32-rc1+ (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014153121.29195.74835.report...@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk
Bug#690461: RM: freecad/0.12.5284-dfsg-7
I am not agreed with that and asked adding wheezy-ignore tag to the bug 617613 [1]. We are not able to add a relicensed opencascade version on this freeze-stage. But in general the problem seems to be resolved and new version will hopefully be packaged after the wheezy-release. Anton [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617613#163 2012/10/14 Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk: freecad contains GPLv2 code and links to OCTPL (non-GPL-compatible) libraries (bug #617613)/ This is supposed to be fixed soon as there is a new version of libopencascade under a BSD licence http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617613#153. Since the relicensed libopencascade is not available in Debian and probably will not get into wheezy, I think freecad should be removed from stable and testing. Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALF6qJmkJf8VY_B-5oObQPW23b0rrfgzgf=ayta4r2qbwfm...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#689147: unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1
On 10/12/2012 11:31 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 16:12:55 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package gajim A new Gajim release fixes some bugs, and particulary the bug #682598 [0] More information can be found in the Mail I sent to debian-release mailing list: [1] debdif is available here: [2] [0]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682598 [1]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/09/msg00042.html [2]: http://lagaule.org/debian/gajim/gajim-0.15.1.debdiff unblock gajim/0.15.1-1 A few comments: - the source format change is not appropriate It's because it was in format 3.0 previously (Gajim 0.14.4), and for 0.15 I did something wrong that I wanted to repair. Moreover, I need to add a patch for your next point (change to _StreamCB) and it's nicer in format 3.0. If you really want, I can re-do the patch in old format. - why does this drop the 0.15-1.1 changelog entry? hmm I didn't do this upload so it was not in my debian files. I've re-added it. - what does the src/common/check_X509.py change do? string comparison and version comparison are kind of different things... Gajim 0.15 badly checks openssl version. see https://trac.gajim.org/ticket/7124 - how is the change to _StreamCB supposed to work? there doesn't seem to be an 'obj' variable in that function It does not work. Oauth2 is not in 0.15 branch, so not usefull. But ok, I've added a patch to remove that. - the src/common/gnupg.py changes are big and don't really look bugfix only. What's the potential for regression there? gnupg.py is an external library that is not yet packaged, it's why it is in Gajim sources (it's in Gajim repos too). I've take the new release from there. It's in Gajim trunk since May, 18, and don't cause any trouble. Of course I've read the changes, and I don't see anything that could cause a problem. Overall I think I'm ok with the farstream/farsight change but I'm not so sure about the rest. At least without some more explanations why they're necessary. Thanks for the comments, I hope I explained what you wanted to know, else don't hesitate to ask. I've re-build a new package available here: http://lagaule.org/debian/gajim/ I'll ask a debian developper to upload it as soon as you tell me it's ok (or you prefer it to be uploaded now? ) -- Yann -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/507ae31d.8040...@lagaule.org
Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing
On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 16:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 14.10.2012 16:09, Ben Hutchings wrote: blcr is not usable with kernel version 2.6.39 or later (see bug #638339). It will probably be fixed upstream at some point, but it cannot now be released in wheezy. Therefore please remove from testing only. As mentioned at the BSP, the library has several reverse dependencies. Do we know whether dropping the kernel module and keeping the libraries would work? (CCing the maintainer). I'm not familiar with the package but from the description it appears that the library is only an interface to the kernel module, thus it won't be usable with current kernel packages. The changelog states that: * blcr-dkms still lacks support for 2.6.39/3.x kernels, but is useful to: - Users running newer kernels with stable - Users running older kernels with testing/unstable - Developers working on support for newer kernels However I don't think that any longterm kernel series older than 2.6.39 will be supported for the lifetime of wheezy. Further, userland packages in jessie will be allowed to assume a kernel version of 3.2 or later, so the next upgrade may fail badly. If the interface between the library and kernel module is stable (though I suspect not...) then the library might be usable with an updated module when that arrives. Then it would seem reasonable to include the library only in wheezy. But if not then I don't think either belongs in the release. [...] # Broken Build-Depends: mpich2: libcr-dev openmpi: libcr-dev These can be built without libcr, and indeed they are on those architectures where it is not available. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Fixing the Catalyst development environment in Wheezy
On 28.08.2012 20:07, intrigeri wrote: the Catalyst development environment is seriously broken and currently in Debian current testing/sid (to get and idea, see #683656, #680819, #680829, #680826, #665222). We, Debian Perl Group, would like to fix that, and we have been working on it during DebCamp and DebConf accordingly. Sorry for the delay since then. [...] So, what we want to get into Wheezy is: - update libcatalyst-perl to 5.90015 (attached: preliminary debdiff's from 5.90012-1 to 5.90015-1) - update libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl to 0.17 (compatibility bugfix -only release) - update libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl to 0.07 (compatibility bugfix -only release) Assuming that the diffs you attached at the time are still current, please go ahead and then file unblock bugs for each package once they've been in unstable for a few days. Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cec2e1e6a7e436416695ac2ec0138...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#690464: pre-approval: dput nmu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Dear release team, There is a bug (#561678) causing lot of extra work to security and release teams and the maintainer has not been very responsive lately. I was wondering uploading a nmu with the diff attached would be considered for unblocking and could make it to the wheezy release. Thank you and please, think of the children. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (100, 'unstable'), (50, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash diff -Nru dput-0.9.6.3/dcut.1 dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/dcut.1 --- dput-0.9.6.3/dcut.1 2012-03-06 07:15:07.0 + +++ dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/dcut.1 2012-10-14 16:40:16.0 +0100 @@ -160,6 +160,19 @@ -END PGP SIGNATURE- .fi +If you've uploaded packages with the --delayed option (uploaded to +\fBDEFERRED\fR queue), then use the \fBcancel\fR command with a .changes +file. + +.in +4n +.nf +$ dcut cancel dput_0.9.4_i386.changes +.fi + +.in +This creates and uploads a commands file just like the other commands. +.nf + .SH LICENSE This program is distributed under the terms of the Gnu General Public License, Version 2 or later. diff -Nru dput-0.9.6.3/debian/changelog dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/debian/changelog --- dput-0.9.6.3/debian/changelog 2012-03-06 07:15:07.0 + +++ dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/debian/changelog 2012-10-14 16:22:48.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +dput (0.9.6.3+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Discourage people to upload packages to the wrong archive (Closes: #561678) + * Deleted obsolete comment about gluck (Closes: #674585) + * Use case and example about dcut added to man page. Thanks +Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp (Closes: #688871) + + -- Alberto Á. Fuentes paj...@gmail.com Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:04:37 +0100 + dput (0.9.6.3) unstable; urgency=low * volatile archive has been discontinued (Closes: #661374) diff -Nru dput-0.9.6.3/dput.cf dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/dput.cf --- dput-0.9.6.3/dput.cf 2012-03-06 07:15:07.0 + +++ dput-0.9.6.3+nmu1/dput.cf 2012-10-14 13:54:17.0 +0100 @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ login = anonymous allow_dcut = 1 method = ftp +# Please, upload your package to the proper archive +# http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#bug-security-upload +allowed_distributions = (?!UNRELEASED|.*-security|.*-backports) # http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2009/05/msg00036.html [ftp-eu] @@ -31,6 +34,9 @@ incoming = /pub/UploadQueue/ login = anonymous allow_dcut = 1 +# Please, upload your package to the proper archive +# http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#bug-security-upload +allowed_distributions = (?!UNRELEASED|.*-security|.*-backports) # http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/09/msg7.html [ssh-upload] @@ -40,6 +46,9 @@ method = scp incoming = /srv/upload.debian.org/UploadQueue/ allow_dcut = 1 +# Please, upload your package to the proper archive +# http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#bug-security-upload +allowed_distributions = (?!UNRELEASED|.*-security|.*-backports) # And if you want to override one of the defaults, add it here. # For example, comment out the next line @@ -72,9 +81,6 @@ incoming = /pub/Incoming/upload login = anonymous -### Delayed Upload queue will move off gluck. -### please use [ftp-master] (aka ftp.upload.debian.org) - [backports] fqdn = backports-master.debian.org method = ftp
Bug#689147: unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1
* Yann Leboulanger aste...@lagaule.org, 2012-10-14, 18:06: - the src/common/gnupg.py changes are big and don't really look bugfix only. What's the potential for regression there? gnupg.py is an external library that is not yet packaged, FWIW, it _is_ packaged as python-gnupg. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014161802.ga3...@jwilk.net
Bug#690466: unblock: libuuid-perl/0.02-5
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package libuuid-perl 0.02-5.
This adds Conflicts: doc-base ( 0.10.3) and closes #652638.
Complete debdiff:
#v+
diff -Nru libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/changelog libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/changelog
- --- libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/changelog 2010-07-08 15:42:15.0 +0200
+++ libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/changelog 2012-10-14 18:10:17.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+libuuid-perl (0.02-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/control: conflict on doc-base 0.10.3 to avoid package
+installation failure due to symbol lookup errors when perl 5.14 and
+libuuid-perl get unpacked and trigger the old doc-base.
+Thanks to Martin Pitt for testing this in Ubuntu, Niko Tyni for the
+initial analysis, and Stuart Prescott for further triaging.
+(Closes: #652638) (LP: #902553)
+
+ -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Sun, 14 Oct 2012 18:09:59 +0200
+
libuuid-perl (0.02-4) unstable; urgency=low
[ gregor herrmann ]
diff -Nru libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/control libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/control
- --- libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/control2010-07-08 15:42:15.0 +0200
+++ libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/control2012-10-14 18:10:17.0 +0200
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
Package: libuuid-perl
Architecture: any
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${perl:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
+Conflicts: doc-base ( 0.10.3)
Description: Perl extension for using UUID interfaces as defined in e2fsprogs
This is a Perl interface to libuuid from e2fsprogs. It allows generation,
parsing, and unparsing of UUIDs.
#v-
unblock libuuid-perl/0.02-5
Thanks in advance,
gregor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=S4Gt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20121014161952.24053.62451.report...@jadzia.comodo.priv.at
Bug#690448: marked as done (RM: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl/0.10-1)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:18:41 +0100 with message-id 20121014171841.81027d9e00ed7ce5a0dca...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#690448: RM: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl/0.10-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #690448, regarding RM: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl/0.10-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 690448: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690448 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment and to close RC bug #680843, I feel it is necessary to remove libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl from testing. libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl | 0.10-1 | source, all Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Depends: gitalist: gitalist-common # Broken Build-Depends: gitalist: libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl (= 0.07) Dependency problem found. gitalist: $ rmadison gitalist gitalist | 0.003006+dfsg-2 | sid | source $ bts select source:gitalist severity:grave severity:serious 681435 665223 So removing libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl from testing does not affect gitalist and there are no other dependency issues in testing. The other parts of this fix relate to libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl and libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl for which I have filed RM bugs as well. Full rationale: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/10/msg00677.html Please remove libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl from testing. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: armel i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:51:31 +0100 Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment and to close RC bug #680843, I feel it is necessary to remove libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl from testing. Closing as the libcatalyst-perl package is likely to be updated. -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpFsfqSlXBoH.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message---
Bug#690446: marked as done (RM: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl/0.06-1)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:19:40 +0100 with message-id 20121014171940.4e05e6b9564f435a145a3...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#690446: RM: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl/0.06-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #690446, regarding RM: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl/0.06-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 690446: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690446 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment and to close RC bug #680819, I feel it is necessary to remove libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl from testing. libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl | 0.06-1 | source, all Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Build-Depends: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl: libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl Dependency problem found. I've also asked for removal of libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl in #690443, so this dependency problem goes away. The other parts of this fix relate to libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl for which I am will be filing an RM bug as well. Full rationale: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/10/msg00677.html Please remove libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl from testing. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: armel i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:39:59 +0100 Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment and to close RC bug #680819, I feel it is necessary to remove libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl from testing. http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/10/msg00677.html Closing as the libcatalyst-perl is likely to be updated. -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpNrCOjyhAxc.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message---
Bug#690443: marked as done (RM: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl/0.15-1)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:20:30 +0100 with message-id 20121014172030.e023481a5d1971c455691...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#690443: RM: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl/0.15-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #690443, regarding RM: libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl/0.15-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 690443: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690443 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment and to close RC bug #680829, I feel it is necessary to remove libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl from testing. libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl | 0.15-1 | source, all Checking reverse dependencies... No dependency problem found. The other parts of this fix relate to libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl and libcatalyst-view-component-subinclude-perl for which I am filing RM bugs as well. Full rationale: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/10/msg00677.html Please remove libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl from testing. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: armel i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 13:29:06 +0100 Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm As part of the fixes for the Catalyst development environment and to close RC bug #680829, I feel it is necessary to remove libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl from testing. http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/10/msg00677.html Closing as libcatalyst-perl is likely to be updated. -- Neil Williams = http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/ pgpwYEPHwYs44.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message---
Re: Fixing the Catalyst development environment in Wheezy
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:14:41 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: We, Debian Perl Group, would like to fix that, and we have been working on it during DebCamp and DebConf accordingly. Sorry for the delay since then. [...] So, what we want to get into Wheezy is: - update libcatalyst-perl to 5.90015 (attached: preliminary debdiff's from 5.90012-1 to 5.90015-1) - update libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl to 0.17 (compatibility bugfix -only release) - update libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl to 0.07 (compatibility bugfix -only release) Assuming that the diffs you attached at the time are still current, libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl and libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl are unchanged since July, libcatalyst-perl has 2 changes in d/changelog, closing two additional bugs that were filed since then and are also fixed by this new version: #v+ % git diff 2f614ff1e0a0ac93dd00699649c61a79027daf76 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 58b6d3f..4382ca8 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -7,11 +7,13 @@ libcatalyst-perl (5.90015-1) unstable; urgency=low - fixes the FTBFS in libtest-www-mechanize-catalyst-perl (Closes: #681422) - fixes Catalyst-Plugin-StackTrace (Closes: #681423) - fixes Catalyst-Plugin-Session-State-Cookie (Closes: #681425) +- fixes Catalyst-Plugin-Unicode-Encoding (Closes: #680816) * Added myself to Uploaders and Copyright [ intrigeri ] * Drop erroneous and harmful Conflicts/Provides/Replaces on libcatalyst-controller-actionrole-perl. +Closes: #683656 * Add Breaks on libcatalystx-simplelogin-perl ( 0.17) and libcatalyst-actionrole-acl-perl ( 0.07). #v- please go ahead and then file unblock bugs for each package once they've been in unstable for a few days. Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. Thanks alot for your work, and sorry for this unpleasant mess! @intrigeri, are you uploading the packages or do you want me to do it? Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Kurt Ostbahn: Da Polifka Rudl signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#689147: unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1
On 10/14/2012 06:18 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Yann Leboulanger aste...@lagaule.org, 2012-10-14, 18:06:
- the src/common/gnupg.py changes are big and don't really look
bugfix only. What's the potential for regression there?
gnupg.py is an external library that is not yet packaged,
FWIW, it _is_ packaged as python-gnupg.
right, but we have a small change in it for logging:
logger = logging.getLogger('gajim.c.gnupg')
And I added an unhandled GPG message from it (full diff is here:
http://paste.gajim.org/view/66412c5c)
I'll open a bug there to add it and will remove it from Gajim sources
for next release.
--
Yann
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/507ae9bb.6050...@lagaule.org
Bug#690468: unblock: libpst/0.6.54-4.1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libpst
The updated package fixes #687879, the policy violation of missing
/usr/share/doc/readpst directory, which was replaced by a symlink.
Debdiff output is attached.
unblock libpst/0.6.54-4.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (150, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different names, permissions or owners.]
Files in second .changes but not in first
-
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/08/748e536800a6dee75025e548e1974fddee40c6.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/14/2e058929c514976724d4e444c280f5dd864763.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/14/4c2b251c5b0959b6b5999559ac2b119ad05fac.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/5f/5dbf629070ebfdf06a2576ada5f3e75fe2267f.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/a2/69abcdbd49a71e0f73066c494e4049c1aa9eaf.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/fb/1886139f0938b2e82f690b1dda25261ceda6a8.debug
Files in first .changes but not in second
-
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/00/cf60cabd3f9ab4f2a7430276ae496cf2d2e35e.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/26/4265c69bc7b2c3ba2ecbd7a4a5cb899aec8910.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/88/08c30ebdf40f66397f7df62134abfeee3c5eab.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/88/7ea7a1b4d45613efb7e4530774987d5b17654a.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/d5/7055aa2b69233acf3ac6056a553d5aca036451.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/ee/718078f41d822058f294e1bc5f55f6c807018f.debug
Control files of package libpst-dev: lines which differ (wdiff format)
--
Depends: libpst4 (= [-0.6.54-4)-] {+0.6.54-4.1)+}
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}
Control files of package libpst4: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}
Control files of package libpst4-dbg: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Depends: libpst4 (= [-0.6.54-4),-] {+0.6.54-4.1),+} pst-utils
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}
Control files of package pst-utils: lines which differ (wdiff format)
-
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}
Control files of package readpst: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}
Bug#690471: unblock: tgmochikit/1.4.2-2.1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package tgmochikit. This version clarifies the
licence status of some files.
diff -u tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/changelog tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/changelog
--- tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/changelog
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+tgmochikit (1.4.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Remove the text 'See scriptaculous.js for full license' from
+Sortable.js. This file (and DragAndDrop.js) is derived from
+scriptaculous-js http://script.aculo.us/dist/ which is MIT-licenced
+and compatible with the MIT/AFL dual-licence applied to all the
+Javascript code. (Closes: #689285)
+
+ -- Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:46:29 +0100
+
tgmochikit (1.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Jakub Wilk ]
diff -u tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/copyright tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/copyright
--- tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/copyright
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/debian/copyright
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
MIT for the Python part
MIT/AFL for the JavaScript part
-All Mochikit JavaScript files report All Rights Reserved. This is, from the
+Most Mochikit JavaScript files report All Rights Reserved. This is, from the
point of view of MochiKit upstream, a way to redirect the licensing to the
LICENSE.txt files that can be found in the distribution root (which dual
licenses it MIT and AFL). See: http://markmail.org/message/doxccpq5mefweeay
only in patch2:
unchanged:
---
tgmochikit-1.4.2.orig/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4_r1383/unpacked/Sortable.js
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4_r1383/unpacked/Sortable.js
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
Copyright (c) 2005 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us)
Mochi-ized By Thomas Herve (_firstna...@nimail.org)
-See scriptaculous.js for full license.
-
***/
MochiKit.Base._deps('Sortable', ['Base', 'Iter', 'DOM', 'Position',
'DragAndDrop']);
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- tgmochikit-1.4.2.orig/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4/unpacked/Sortable.js
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4/unpacked/Sortable.js
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
Copyright (c) 2005 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us)
Mochi-ized By Thomas Herve (_firstna...@nimail.org)
-See scriptaculous.js for full license.
-
***/
MochiKit.Base._deps('Sortable', ['Base', 'Iter', 'DOM', 'Position',
'DragAndDrop']);
only in patch2:
unchanged:
---
tgmochikit-1.4.2.orig/tgmochikit/static/javascript/trunk/unpacked/Sortable.js
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/tgmochikit/static/javascript/trunk/unpacked/Sortable.js
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
Copyright (c) 2005 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us)
Mochi-ized By Thomas Herve (_firstna...@nimail.org)
-See scriptaculous.js for full license.
-
***/
MochiKit.Base._module('Sortable', '1.5', ['Base', 'Iter', 'DOM', 'Position',
'DragAndDrop']);
only in patch2:
unchanged:
---
tgmochikit-1.4.2.orig/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4.1/unpacked/Sortable.js
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4.1/unpacked/Sortable.js
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
Copyright (c) 2005 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us)
Mochi-ized By Thomas Herve (_firstna...@nimail.org)
-See scriptaculous.js for full license.
-
***/
MochiKit.Base._deps('Sortable', ['Base', 'Iter', 'DOM', 'Position',
'DragAndDrop']);
only in patch2:
unchanged:
---
tgmochikit-1.4.2.orig/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4.2/unpacked/Sortable.js
+++ tgmochikit-1.4.2/tgmochikit/static/javascript/1.4.2/unpacked/Sortable.js
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
Copyright (c) 2005 Thomas Fuchs (http://script.aculo.us, http://mir.aculo.us)
Mochi-ized By Thomas Herve (_firstna...@nimail.org)
-See scriptaculous.js for full license.
-
***/
MochiKit.Base._deps('Sortable', ['Base', 'Iter', 'DOM', 'Position',
'DragAndDrop']);
--- END ---
unblock tgmochikit/1.4.2-2.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: amd64
Kernel: Linux 3.2.32-rc1+ (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20121014165602.30802.94788.report...@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk
Bug#690468: marked as done (unblock: libpst/0.6.54-4.1)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:53:49 +0100
with message-id d9bd30dde8cad99eeb73ea14feff0...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#690468: unblock: libpst/0.6.54-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690468,
regarding unblock: libpst/0.6.54-4.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
690468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libpst
The updated package fixes #687879, the policy violation of missing
/usr/share/doc/readpst directory, which was replaced by a symlink.
Debdiff output is attached.
unblock libpst/0.6.54-4.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (150, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different names, permissions or owners.]
Files in second .changes but not in first
-
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/08/748e536800a6dee75025e548e1974fddee40c6.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/14/2e058929c514976724d4e444c280f5dd864763.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/14/4c2b251c5b0959b6b5999559ac2b119ad05fac.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/5f/5dbf629070ebfdf06a2576ada5f3e75fe2267f.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/a2/69abcdbd49a71e0f73066c494e4049c1aa9eaf.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/fb/1886139f0938b2e82f690b1dda25261ceda6a8.debug
Files in first .changes but not in second
-
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/00/cf60cabd3f9ab4f2a7430276ae496cf2d2e35e.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/26/4265c69bc7b2c3ba2ecbd7a4a5cb899aec8910.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/88/08c30ebdf40f66397f7df62134abfeee3c5eab.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/88/7ea7a1b4d45613efb7e4530774987d5b17654a.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/d5/7055aa2b69233acf3ac6056a553d5aca036451.debug
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/ee/718078f41d822058f294e1bc5f55f6c807018f.debug
Control files of package libpst-dev: lines which differ (wdiff format)
--
Depends: libpst4 (= [-0.6.54-4)-] {+0.6.54-4.1)+}
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}
Control files of package libpst4: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}
Control files of package libpst4-dbg: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Depends: libpst4 (= [-0.6.54-4),-] {+0.6.54-4.1),+} pst-utils
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}
Control files of package pst-utils: lines which differ (wdiff format)
-
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}
Control files of package readpst: lines which differ (wdiff format)
---
Version: [-0.6.54-4-] {+0.6.54-4.1+}
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 14.10.2012 17:40, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
Please unblock package libpst
The updated package fixes #687879, the policy violation of missing
/usr/share/doc/readpst directory, which was replaced by a symlink.
Already done earlier today; see #690440.
Regards,
Adam---End Message---
Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing
On 14 October 2012 17:07, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 16:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 14.10.2012 16:09, Ben Hutchings wrote: blcr is not usable with kernel version 2.6.39 or later (see bug #638339). It will probably be fixed upstream at some point, but it cannot now be released in wheezy. Therefore please remove from testing only. As mentioned at the BSP, the library has several reverse dependencies. Do we know whether dropping the kernel module and keeping the libraries would work? (CCing the maintainer). I'm not familiar with the package but from the description it appears that the library is only an interface to the kernel module, thus it won't be usable with current kernel packages. The changelog states that: * blcr-dkms still lacks support for 2.6.39/3.x kernels, but is useful to: - Users running newer kernels with stable - Users running older kernels with testing/unstable - Developers working on support for newer kernels However I don't think that any longterm kernel series older than 2.6.39 will be supported for the lifetime of wheezy. Further, userland packages in jessie will be allowed to assume a kernel version of 3.2 or later, so the next upgrade may fail badly. If the interface between the library and kernel module is stable (though I suspect not...) then the library might be usable with an updated module when that arrives. Then it would seem reasonable to include the library only in wheezy. But if not then I don't think either belongs in the release. [...] # Broken Build-Depends: mpich2: libcr-dev openmpi: libcr-dev These can be built without libcr, and indeed they are on those architectures where it is not available. The library behaves sanely without the kernel module and dropping just the -dkms package would be my preferred solution. Most binaries that use BLCR are built to run in environments where the presence of the kernel part isn't a given. Upstream doesn't have funding at the moment to add support for newer kernels (they sound like it's something they hope to return to though) and my attempts at developing a patch were largely unsuccessful, i.e. worse than no patch at all. I anticipate that the library itself ought to be useable when such a patch arrives. There's a bug outstanding for dropping the Recommends to Suggests on the kernel module, that combined with removing the -dkms package should be sufficient for releasing without storing up pain for the future in my view. Alan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAD2JkJeRD5fZHdiL1tmc4OqTM=gdGt=nn+u6oqffutpuram...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#690468: unblock: libpst/0.6.54-4.1
On 14/10/12 18:53, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Already done earlier today; see #690440. Ha! Someone could have CC'd me on that! ;) Thanks anyway and sorry for the noise! Cheers -- Leo costela Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#690472: unblock: wzdftpd/0.8.3-6.2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package wzdftpd This fixes bug #689906 which made the daemon fail to start after reboot if /run is a tmpfs. diff -u wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/changelog wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/changelog --- wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/changelog +++ wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +wzdftpd (0.8.3-6.2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Create /var/run/wzdftpd from init script (Closes: #689906) +(based on patch by Thomas Goirand) + * Fix spelling of 'bandwidth' in description + * Remove duplicate upstream changelog + + -- Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:46:01 +0100 + wzdftpd (0.8.3-6.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. diff -u wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/control wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/control --- wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/control +++ wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/control @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol. . Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security, - speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, + speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc. . It includes several authentication backends, is easily scriptable and provides @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol. . Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security, - speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, + speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc. . This package provides the MySQL backend for wzdftpd. @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol. . Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security, - speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, + speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc. . This package provides the PostgreSQL backend for wzdftpd. @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol. . Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security, - speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, + speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc. . This package provides the necessary files to enable zeroconf support in @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol. . Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security, - speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, + speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc. . This package provides the necessary files to run Tcl plugins in wzdftpd, @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol. . Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security, - speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, + speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc. . This package provides the necessary files to run Perl plugins in wzdftpd, @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol. . Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security, - speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, + speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc. . This package provides all needed files to develop extensions for wzdftpd. diff -u wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/init.d wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/init.d --- wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/init.d +++ wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/init.d @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ DAEMON=/usr/sbin/wzdftpd NAME=wzdftpd DESC=wzdftpd +PID_DIR=/var/run/$NAME test -x $DAEMON || exit 0 @@ -34,6 +35,11 @@ case $1 in start) echo -n Starting $DESC: + mkdir -p $PID_DIR + # the following will be used to run the server as a non-privileged user + if id ftp /dev/null 2/dev/null; then + chown ftp $PID_DIR + fi start-stop-daemon --start --quiet \ --pidfile /var/run/$NAME/$NAME.pid --exec $DAEMON -- $DAEMON_OPTS echo $NAME. diff -u wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/wzdftpd.postrm wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/wzdftpd.postrm --- wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/wzdftpd.postrm +++ wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/wzdftpd.postrm @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ rm -f /etc/wzdftpd/users /etc/wzdftpd/users.OLD rm -f /etc/wzdftpd/wzd.cfg rm -f /etc/wzdftpd/wzd.cfg.wzdftpd-old /etc/wzdftpd/wzd.cfg.wzdftpd-new
Bug#690472: marked as done (unblock: wzdftpd/0.8.3-6.2)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 18:08:30 +0100 with message-id 36ec702d81b0e3355c8ad69d0ef47...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#690472: unblock: wzdftpd/0.8.3-6.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #690472, regarding unblock: wzdftpd/0.8.3-6.2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 690472: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690472 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package wzdftpd This fixes bug #689906 which made the daemon fail to start after reboot if /run is a tmpfs. diff -u wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/changelog wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/changelog --- wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/changelog +++ wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +wzdftpd (0.8.3-6.2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Create /var/run/wzdftpd from init script (Closes: #689906) +(based on patch by Thomas Goirand) + * Fix spelling of 'bandwidth' in description + * Remove duplicate upstream changelog + + -- Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:46:01 +0100 + wzdftpd (0.8.3-6.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload. diff -u wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/control wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/control --- wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/control +++ wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/control @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol. . Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security, - speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, + speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc. . It includes several authentication backends, is easily scriptable and provides @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol. . Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security, - speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, + speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc. . This package provides the MySQL backend for wzdftpd. @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol. . Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security, - speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, + speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc. . This package provides the PostgreSQL backend for wzdftpd. @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol. . Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security, - speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, + speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc. . This package provides the necessary files to enable zeroconf support in @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol. . Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security, - speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, + speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc. . This package provides the necessary files to run Tcl plugins in wzdftpd, @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol. . Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security, - speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, + speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc. . This package provides the necessary files to run Perl plugins in wzdftpd, @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ implements the lastest RFC extensions to FTP protocol. . Features are: flexible user management, acls, virtual users/groups, security, - speed, bandwith limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, + speed, bandwidth limitation, per command authorization, virtual directories, dynamic ip changes auto-detection, etc. . This package provides all needed files to develop extensions for wzdftpd. diff -u wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/init.d wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/init.d --- wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/init.d +++ wzdftpd-0.8.3/debian/init.d @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ DAEMON=/usr/sbin/wzdftpd
Bug#690458: RM: blcr/0.8.2-15 testing
On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 17:56 +0100, Alan Woodland wrote: [...] The library behaves sanely without the kernel module and dropping just the -dkms package would be my preferred solution. Most binaries that use BLCR are built to run in environments where the presence of the kernel part isn't a given. Upstream doesn't have funding at the moment to add support for newer kernels (they sound like it's something they hope to return to though) and my attempts at developing a patch were largely unsuccessful, i.e. worse than no patch at all. Unfortunately checkpoint/restore is not something that can be implemented properly without explicit support in the kernel, i.e. it's not suitable for an out-of-tree module. This has gradually being added and I think it is mostly done upstream, but much of that is post-3.2. Hopefully libcr will be updated in future to make use of the new kernel mechanisms rather than its own module. I anticipate that the library itself ought to be useable when such a patch arrives. There's a bug outstanding for dropping the Recommends to Suggests on the kernel module, that combined with removing the -dkms package should be sufficient for releasing without storing up pain for the future in my view. Yes, that sounds like a reasonable thing to do for now. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Always try to do things in chronological order; it's less confusing that way. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#690475: release.debian.org: unblock: pear-horde-channel/4
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hello release team, Mathieu Parent uploaded a pear-horde-channel source package to unstable. This builds the pear-horde-channel binary package, which basically consists of just the file /usr/share/php/.channels/pear.horde.org.reg. This file is needed for building php-horde-activesync php-horde-alarm php-horde-argv php-horde-auth php-horde-autoloader php-horde-browser php-horde-cache [...] php-horde-vfs php-horde-view php-horde-xml-element php-horde-xml-wbxml (see (Bug #683554 RM: horde3 and reverse dependencies) for the complete list). In current testing, the pear-horde-channel binary package is created from the horde3 source package, which is scheduled for removal from Debian (Bug#683554: RM: horde3 and reverse dependencies). The debdiff of the old and new binary package is available from http://mdcc.cx/tmp/pear-horde-channel/pear-horde-channel_3.3.12%2bdebian0-2.2_vs_4.debdiff . The files debian/copyright as well as a full diff are available from http://mdcc.cx/tmp/pear-horde-channel/ . Unfortunately, the new pear-horde-channel Debian source package lacks instructions on how to recreate the generated file pear.horde.org.reg. I've just filed Bug #690463 reporting this issue. In the mean time, please allow pear-horde-channel/4 to enter Debian testing. Thank you for considering. Joost unblock: pear-horde-channel/4 PS: See Bug#683628 release-notes: Re: Horde and Kolab removed for even more background information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014172017.ge...@beskar.mdcc.cx
Bug#690464: pre-approval: dput nmu
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 17:14:08 +0100, Alberto Á. Fuentes wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Dear release team, There is a bug (#561678) causing lot of extra work to security and release teams and the maintainer has not been very responsive lately. I was wondering uploading a nmu with the diff attached would be considered for unblocking and could make it to the wheezy release. Looks ok to me. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#668008: transition/unblock: uw-imap
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:12:19 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
Unfortunately, Jonas's decision to upload without an SONAME bump broke all
packages that use libc-client (see bug #682256), due to an extra, internal
(and in this case unnecessarily strict) version check that fails.
The SONAME *shouldn't* have had to be changed as 2007f is merely a bugfix
release, except for an attempt to also support AIX 5.2, but that's nothing
that affects us. There are no ABI or API changes. See attached diff.
How about the patch below?
Cheers,
Julien
diff -Nru uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog
uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog
--- uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-06-29 13:32:24.0 +0200
+++ uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-10-14 20:02:14.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+uw-imap (8:2007f~dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Disable broken version check (closes: #682256)
+
+ -- Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:02:13 +0200
+
uw-imap (8:2007f~dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff -Nru uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/2011_disable_version_check.patch
uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/2011_disable_version_check.patch
--- uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/2011_disable_version_check.patch
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/2011_disable_version_check.patch
2012-10-14 19:59:55.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Index: uw-imap/src/c-client/mail.c
+===
+--- uw-imap.orig/src/c-client/mail.c
uw-imap/src/c-client/mail.c
+@@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ static void mail_string_setpos (STRING *
+
+ void mail_versioncheck (char *version)
+ {
++#if 0
+ /* attempt to protect again wrong .h */
+ if (strcmp (version,mailcclientversion)) {
+ char tmp[MAILTMPLEN];
+@@ -300,6 +301,7 @@ void mail_versioncheck (char *version)
+version,mailcclientversion);
+ fatal (tmp);
+ }
++#endif
+ }
+
+
diff -Nru uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/series
uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/series
--- uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/series2012-06-29 13:05:33.0
+0200
+++ uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/patches/series2012-10-14 19:58:25.0
+0200
@@ -5,3 +5,4 @@
2002_mailspool.patch
2004_no_binaries_below_etc.patch
2010_disallow_escaping_home.patch
+2011_disable_version_check.patch
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#687779: marked as done (unblock: ksh/93u+20120628-1)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:32:52 +0200 with message-id 20121014183252.gj17...@radis.cristau.org and subject line Re: Bug#687779: ksh: diff for NMU version 93u+-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #687779, regarding unblock: ksh/93u+20120628-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 687779: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687779 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Hi, Please unblock package ksh/93u+20120628-1 which fixes #679966 (severity grave). Frankly it would be better to exclude ksh from the next Debian release than include it with this bug because it breaks very basic functionality in the shell. The fix was done upstream so I don't really know the details. Thanks Oliver ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 23:40:45 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: tags 679966 + patch tags 679966 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ksh (versioned as 93u+-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/00. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. RMs: please clear for an upload to t-p-u, thanks. Uploaded and approved. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy
[ Maybe a -backports list would be a better place to discuss this issue than -release ] Hi, Le 14/10/2012 03:41, Mike Hommey a écrit : When you have backports in your sources.list, you don't automatically get your upgrades from there. Once you do install one for the first time, subsequent upgrades come from backports. But in the case of iceweasel, version bumps also require new packages for xulrunner and libmozjs, and that prevents automatic upgrades: iceweasel's is kept back by apt. Default apt preferences for the iceweasel packages would ensure stable users that use backports sources will always get the latest. You may wish to include an /etc/apt/preferences.d/iceweasel [1] file in your backported software, but I wonder if that would be a really good idea, if that would be enough to achieve your purpose, and if that would be safe of unwanted side effects. 1: $ cat /etc/apt/preferences.d/iceweasel Package: iceweasel Pin: release a=squeeze-backports Pin-Priority: 500 Regards David signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012, David Prévot wrote: [ Maybe a -backports list would be a better place to discuss this issue than -release ] Hi, Le 14/10/2012 03:41, Mike Hommey a écrit : When you have backports in your sources.list, you don't automatically get your upgrades from there. Once you do install one for the first time, subsequent upgrades come from backports. But in the case of iceweasel, version bumps also require new packages for xulrunner and libmozjs, and that prevents automatic upgrades: iceweasel's is kept back by apt. Default apt preferences for the iceweasel packages would ensure stable users that use backports sources will always get the latest. You may wish to include an /etc/apt/preferences.d/iceweasel [1] file in your backported software, but I wonder if that would be a really good idea, if that would be enough to achieve your purpose, and if that would be safe of unwanted side effects. Wrong, not in the backported one. In the stable one. If a package is installed from bpo the file isn't needed. Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014195602.ga5...@snow-crash.org
Bug#668008: transition/unblock: uw-imap
On söndagen den 14 oktober 2012, you stated the following: On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:12:19 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: Unfortunately, Jonas's decision to upload without an SONAME bump broke all packages that use libc-client (see bug #682256), due to an extra, internal (and in this case unnecessarily strict) version check that fails. The SONAME *shouldn't* have had to be changed as 2007f is merely a bugfix release, except for an attempt to also support AIX 5.2, but that's nothing that affects us. There are no ABI or API changes. See attached diff. How about the patch below? It might certainly be a good idea too disable that check permanently; it is rather redundant after all. diff -Nru uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog --- uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-06-29 13:32:24.0 +0200 +++ uw-imap-2007f~dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-10-14 20:02:14.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +uw-imap (8:2007f~dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Disable broken version check (closes: #682256) + + -- Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:02:13 +0200 + -- Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org Debian Developer signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#690466: marked as done (unblock: libuuid-perl/0.02-5)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:27:42 +0100
with message-id 1350250062.4156.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#690466: unblock: libuuid-perl/0.02-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #690466,
regarding unblock: libuuid-perl/0.02-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
690466: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690466
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package libuuid-perl 0.02-5.
This adds Conflicts: doc-base ( 0.10.3) and closes #652638.
Complete debdiff:
#v+
diff -Nru libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/changelog libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/changelog
- --- libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/changelog 2010-07-08 15:42:15.0 +0200
+++ libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/changelog 2012-10-14 18:10:17.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+libuuid-perl (0.02-5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/control: conflict on doc-base 0.10.3 to avoid package
+installation failure due to symbol lookup errors when perl 5.14 and
+libuuid-perl get unpacked and trigger the old doc-base.
+Thanks to Martin Pitt for testing this in Ubuntu, Niko Tyni for the
+initial analysis, and Stuart Prescott for further triaging.
+(Closes: #652638) (LP: #902553)
+
+ -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org Sun, 14 Oct 2012 18:09:59 +0200
+
libuuid-perl (0.02-4) unstable; urgency=low
[ gregor herrmann ]
diff -Nru libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/control libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/control
- --- libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/control2010-07-08 15:42:15.0 +0200
+++ libuuid-perl-0.02/debian/control2012-10-14 18:10:17.0 +0200
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
Package: libuuid-perl
Architecture: any
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${perl:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
+Conflicts: doc-base ( 0.10.3)
Description: Perl extension for using UUID interfaces as defined in e2fsprogs
This is a Perl interface to libuuid from e2fsprogs. It allows generation,
parsing, and unparsing of UUIDs.
#v-
unblock libuuid-perl/0.02-5
Thanks in advance,
gregor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=S4Gt
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 18:19 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
Please unblock package libuuid-perl 0.02-5.
This adds Conflicts: doc-base ( 0.10.3) and closes #652638.
Unblocked; thanks.
Also closing #673913, which is a symptom of the issue fixed by this
change.
Regards,
Adam---End Message---
Bug#690501: unblock: loadlin/1.6f-1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
Please unblock package loadlin
unblock loadlin/1.6f-1
See the attached debdiff. This is a new upstream release (I am
upstream), but it only includes two things:
- the cppcheck patch we had in Debian is now integrated as such
upstream, so this change is a no-op for us.
- the actually interesting thing is the change in loadlin.asm, which is
needed to be able to boot wheezy kernels. The change reduces the buffer
size for the command line (down to 864 characters, still plenty) in
order to release 4KiB room for the setup heap, needed by newer kernels.
I preferred to upload the new upstream 1.6f release itself rather than
adding a patch to avoid confusion for users: since the upstream release
mainly contain the second change, using version name 1.6e in Debian
would let users think that change is not there. Or conversely, people
using 1.6e from Debian would believe that the upstream 1.6e already had
the change.
Thanks,
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.0.4 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--
Samuel
Allez, soyez sympa ... traduisez-lui linux
Linux, c'est comme le miel : c'est vachement bon mais ça attire les
mouches. En plus, ça colle aux doigts et on a du mal à s'en défaire.
-+- TP in: Guide du linuxien pervers - Barrez vous les mouches !
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/changelog loadlin-1.6f/debian/changelog
--- loadlin-1.6e/debian/changelog 2012-04-01 21:32:40.0 +0200
+++ loadlin-1.6f/debian/changelog 2012-10-05 02:51:20.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+loadlin (1.6f-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * New upstream release. Fixes booting the Wheezy kernels.
+ * debian/rules:
+- Set BYHAND to yes, as we need a new loadlin.exe uploaded to mirrors to
+be able to boot the Wheezy kernels.
+ * debian/patches/cppcheck: Drop, merged upstream.
+
+ -- Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org Mon, 17 Sep 2012 01:42:31 +0200
+
loadlin (1.6e-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/rules:
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/99-yasm.patch
loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/99-yasm.patch
--- loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/99-yasm.patch 2011-02-21 23:14:56.0
+0100
+++ loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/99-yasm.patch 2012-10-05 02:49:13.0
+0200
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
diff -r 56b6cf82d167 -r c8190a00fb15 src/loadlin.asm
--- a/src/loadlin.asm Tue Feb 09 03:29:55 2010 +0100
+++ b/src/loadlin.asm Wed Apr 28 20:13:19 2010 +0200
-@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ LOADLIN_VERSION equ '1.6e'
+@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ LOADLIN_VERSION equ '1.6f'
locals
jumps
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/cppcheck
loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/cppcheck
--- loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/cppcheck2012-04-01 21:28:36.0
+0200
+++ loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/cppcheck1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
+0100
@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-# HG changeset patch
-# User Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@xensource.com
-# Date 1293314723 -3600
-# Branch debian
-# Node ID cc08aceb936fadb70ad6feaccb8bc97ba1c1ad6c
-# Parent 70d9a1ffd330c9b79454b5f4496cddfd8474b8f9
-cppcheck fixes
-
-diff -r 70d9a1ffd330 -r cc08aceb936f src/srclinux/pgadjust.c
a/src/srclinux/pgadjust.c Sun Sep 12 00:29:00 2010 +0200
-+++ b/src/srclinux/pgadjust.c Sat Dec 25 23:05:23 2010 +0100
-@@ -363,13 +363,16 @@
- PAGELIST-count=i;
- PAGELIST-blocks[bi-1].tcount=i-PAGELIST-blocks[bi-1].start;
- PAGELIST-auxbuf=(void *)0x1000;
-+ fclose(f);
- }
-
- int main(int argc, char** argv)
- {
- read_pagelist(argv[1]);
-- printf(count %d nblocks %d\n, PAGELIST-count,
PAGELIST-number_of_blocks);
-- if (PAGELIST) adjust();
-+ if (PAGELIST) {
-+printf(count %d nblocks %d\n, PAGELIST-count,
PAGELIST-number_of_blocks);
-+adjust();
-+ }
- return 0;
- }
-
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/series loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/series
--- loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/series 2012-04-01 21:28:42.0 +0200
+++ loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/series 2012-09-17 01:59:41.0 +0200
@@ -1,2 +1 @@
-cppcheck
99-yasm.patch
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/rules loadlin-1.6f/debian/rules
--- loadlin-1.6e/debian/rules 2012-04-01 21:22:46.0 +0200
+++ loadlin-1.6f/debian/rules 2012-09-17 01:58:57.0 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
DEB_TARBALL=
DEB_INSTALL_CHANGELOGS_loadlin=doc/changes
-BYHAND ?= no
+BYHAND ?= yes
include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/doc/changes loadlin-1.6f/doc/changes
--- loadlin-1.6e/doc/changes2010-08-25 02:48:28.0 +0200
+++ loadlin-1.6f/doc/changes2012-09-17 01:37:40.982396102 +0200
@@ -2,6 +2,16 @@
===
Bug#690502: unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-5
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ruby1.8
Version 1.8.7.358-5, just uploaded into unstable, includes a fix for
CVE-2012-4381 (Debian bug #689945).
Attached you will find a debdiff between the version in wheezy and this
one.
unblock ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-5
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
diff -Nru ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/changelog ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/changelog
--- ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/changelog 2012-06-02 07:34:01.0 -0300
+++ ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/changelog 2012-10-14 19:46:41.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ruby1.8 (1.8.7.358-5) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * added debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch to fix CVE-2012-4481
+(Closes: #689945)
+
+ -- Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org Sun, 14 Oct 2012 19:45:52 -0300
+
ruby1.8 (1.8.7.358-4) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/rules: avoid running DRB tests, since they crash and leave runaway
diff -Nru ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch
--- ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch 1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 -0300
+++ ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch 2012-10-14 19:45:15.0 -0300
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+Description: avoid breaking safefity in strings passed to Exception#to_s
+ Fixes CVE-2012-4481
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/689945
+Origin: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q4/22
+Reviewed-By: Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
+
+--- ruby1.8-1.8.7.358.orig/error.c
ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/error.c
+@@ -665,9 +665,6 @@ name_err_to_s(exc)
+
+ if (NIL_P(mesg)) return rb_class_name(CLASS_OF(exc));
+ StringValue(str);
+-if (str != mesg) {
+- OBJ_INFECT(str, mesg);
+-}
+ return str;
+ }
+
diff -Nru ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/series ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/series
--- ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/series 2012-05-27 10:59:27.0 -0300
+++ ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/series 2012-10-14 19:43:03.0 -0300
@@ -13,3 +13,4 @@
110703_CVE-2011-0188.patch
tcltk-no-rpath.patch
use-ldflags.patch
+CVE-2012-4481.patch
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#689579: unblock: dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5/0.5
Hi Adam, On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:26:30 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Looking through the diff, there's an undocumented bump of the debhelper compat level from 4 to 6. What's the rationale for that? Hmm, this package is very simple and so I seldom update the package. So I'm afraid the package becomes rather an old style package as time passes. So when I've got a chance to update package I've tried to update anything as possible as I can. I don't remeber precisely, but I guess I bump the debhelper compat level along the following modification. * To erase lintian warnings, we refine debian/rules a bit. This might be not an appropriate modification at a freeze period but I think this is not a practical problem. If I should change packaging or changelog or anything, please let me know. Best regards, 2012-10-15(Mon) -- Debian Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda kohda AT debian.org Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121015.102113.92653586279398529.atsuhito@at-vaio
Bug#690502: marked as done (unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-5)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2012 05:54:12 +0100
with message-id 1350276852.4156.4.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#690502: unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #690502,
regarding unblock: ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
690502: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690502
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ruby1.8
Version 1.8.7.358-5, just uploaded into unstable, includes a fix for
CVE-2012-4381 (Debian bug #689945).
Attached you will find a debdiff between the version in wheezy and this
one.
unblock ruby1.8/1.8.7.358-5
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
diff -Nru ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/changelog ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/changelog
--- ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/changelog 2012-06-02 07:34:01.0 -0300
+++ ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/changelog 2012-10-14 19:46:41.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+ruby1.8 (1.8.7.358-5) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * added debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch to fix CVE-2012-4481
+(Closes: #689945)
+
+ -- Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org Sun, 14 Oct 2012 19:45:52 -0300
+
ruby1.8 (1.8.7.358-4) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/rules: avoid running DRB tests, since they crash and leave runaway
diff -Nru ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch
--- ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch 1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 -0300
+++ ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/CVE-2012-4481.patch 2012-10-14 19:45:15.0 -0300
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+Description: avoid breaking safefity in strings passed to Exception#to_s
+ Fixes CVE-2012-4481
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/689945
+Origin: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q4/22
+Reviewed-By: Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org
+
+--- ruby1.8-1.8.7.358.orig/error.c
ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/error.c
+@@ -665,9 +665,6 @@ name_err_to_s(exc)
+
+ if (NIL_P(mesg)) return rb_class_name(CLASS_OF(exc));
+ StringValue(str);
+-if (str != mesg) {
+- OBJ_INFECT(str, mesg);
+-}
+ return str;
+ }
+
diff -Nru ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/series ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/series
--- ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/series 2012-05-27 10:59:27.0 -0300
+++ ruby1.8-1.8.7.358/debian/patches/series 2012-10-14 19:43:03.0 -0300
@@ -13,3 +13,4 @@
110703_CVE-2011-0188.patch
tcltk-no-rpath.patch
use-ldflags.patch
+CVE-2012-4481.patch
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 20:34 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Please unblock package ruby1.8
Version 1.8.7.358-5, just uploaded into unstable, includes a fix for
CVE-2012-4381 (Debian bug #689945).
Unblocked; thanks.
Regards,
Adam---End Message---
Bug#690501: marked as done (unblock: loadlin/1.6f-1)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Oct 2012 07:56:00 +0200
with message-id 20121015055600.gl17...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#690501: unblock: loadlin/1.6f-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690501,
regarding unblock: loadlin/1.6f-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
690501: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690501
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
Please unblock package loadlin
unblock loadlin/1.6f-1
See the attached debdiff. This is a new upstream release (I am
upstream), but it only includes two things:
- the cppcheck patch we had in Debian is now integrated as such
upstream, so this change is a no-op for us.
- the actually interesting thing is the change in loadlin.asm, which is
needed to be able to boot wheezy kernels. The change reduces the buffer
size for the command line (down to 864 characters, still plenty) in
order to release 4KiB room for the setup heap, needed by newer kernels.
I preferred to upload the new upstream 1.6f release itself rather than
adding a patch to avoid confusion for users: since the upstream release
mainly contain the second change, using version name 1.6e in Debian
would let users think that change is not there. Or conversely, people
using 1.6e from Debian would believe that the upstream 1.6e already had
the change.
Thanks,
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.0.4 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--
Samuel
Allez, soyez sympa ... traduisez-lui linux
Linux, c'est comme le miel : c'est vachement bon mais ça attire les
mouches. En plus, ça colle aux doigts et on a du mal à s'en défaire.
-+- TP in: Guide du linuxien pervers - Barrez vous les mouches !
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/changelog loadlin-1.6f/debian/changelog
--- loadlin-1.6e/debian/changelog 2012-04-01 21:32:40.0 +0200
+++ loadlin-1.6f/debian/changelog 2012-10-05 02:51:20.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+loadlin (1.6f-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * New upstream release. Fixes booting the Wheezy kernels.
+ * debian/rules:
+- Set BYHAND to yes, as we need a new loadlin.exe uploaded to mirrors to
+be able to boot the Wheezy kernels.
+ * debian/patches/cppcheck: Drop, merged upstream.
+
+ -- Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org Mon, 17 Sep 2012 01:42:31 +0200
+
loadlin (1.6e-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/rules:
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/99-yasm.patch
loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/99-yasm.patch
--- loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/99-yasm.patch 2011-02-21 23:14:56.0
+0100
+++ loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/99-yasm.patch 2012-10-05 02:49:13.0
+0200
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
diff -r 56b6cf82d167 -r c8190a00fb15 src/loadlin.asm
--- a/src/loadlin.asm Tue Feb 09 03:29:55 2010 +0100
+++ b/src/loadlin.asm Wed Apr 28 20:13:19 2010 +0200
-@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ LOADLIN_VERSION equ '1.6e'
+@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ LOADLIN_VERSION equ '1.6f'
locals
jumps
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/cppcheck
loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/cppcheck
--- loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/cppcheck2012-04-01 21:28:36.0
+0200
+++ loadlin-1.6f/debian/patches/cppcheck1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
+0100
@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-# HG changeset patch
-# User Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@xensource.com
-# Date 1293314723 -3600
-# Branch debian
-# Node ID cc08aceb936fadb70ad6feaccb8bc97ba1c1ad6c
-# Parent 70d9a1ffd330c9b79454b5f4496cddfd8474b8f9
-cppcheck fixes
-
-diff -r 70d9a1ffd330 -r cc08aceb936f src/srclinux/pgadjust.c
a/src/srclinux/pgadjust.c Sun Sep 12 00:29:00 2010 +0200
-+++ b/src/srclinux/pgadjust.c Sat Dec 25 23:05:23 2010 +0100
-@@ -363,13 +363,16 @@
- PAGELIST-count=i;
- PAGELIST-blocks[bi-1].tcount=i-PAGELIST-blocks[bi-1].start;
- PAGELIST-auxbuf=(void *)0x1000;
-+ fclose(f);
- }
-
- int main(int argc, char** argv)
- {
- read_pagelist(argv[1]);
-- printf(count %d nblocks %d\n, PAGELIST-count,
PAGELIST-number_of_blocks);
-- if (PAGELIST) adjust();
-+ if (PAGELIST) {
-+printf(count %d nblocks %d\n, PAGELIST-count,
PAGELIST-number_of_blocks);
-+adjust();
-+ }
- return 0;
- }
-
diff -Nru loadlin-1.6e/debian/patches/series
