Bug#694850: license RC bug 679980 in cacti: request for release-team opinion for wheezy
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, I am unsure if it was a mistake by me to not submit the request for your opinion below as a bug, i.e. that the message was lost in your e-mail filters. Therefor I now file the request as a bug in the BTS. Apologies if my previous e-mail to debian-release@l.d.o was still in your queue and this is a duplicate. Paul On 25-11-12 13:53, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi release team, Cacti has a nearly 5 months old standing RC bug [1] filed against it about files with a non-DFSG license (distribution is possible, but others can not use the copy for other purposes, they need to get their own free copy). I was hoping that cacti upstream would create the code needed to provide the functionality [2] that would be removed by removing the files in question. I have now given up on that happening soon, so I have created a patch [3] to do that. Before implementing this in the Debian cacti package, I request your opinion on what is acceptable for wheezy. I see several options: 1) Ignore this bug for wheezy as these files are shipped already for so long and distribution is still allowed (I would prefer we don't choose this option). 2) Remove the problematic files from source, leaving the cacti package slightly crippled. The functionality in question is not needed for cacti to work, but if you monitor lots of systems with cacti, your ability to locate the proper graphs easily is decreased. (I would rather prefer 1)). 3) Remove the problematic files from source, and apply the patch I attached to bug 679980 [3], but DON'T add the needed jstree code to the package. As my patch, in contrast to the current tree, generates a visible (but non-collapsing) HTML tree, this option is already better than 1). However, the tree would be enormous for large sites, still making it hardly useful for them. This option will be better than 2), even more so for small sites. 4) Same as 3) but also embed jstree in the package [4]. As the jquery and jquery-cookies dependency can be satisfied by packages already in Debian, only jstree is needed to be in cacti. It should be clear that I prefer this solution (that is why I did the work) but I can imagine that the release team finds it too intrusive in this stage of the release cycle. So my request is that you state how you want this bug resolved for wheezy. If needed, I can prepare the preferred option in experimental first, so you can postpone the final decision. But the main change will be the patch [3] and the inclusion of jstee [5] and it's css and pictures [6]. With kind regards, Paul By the way, I would still like to include the changes in the unblock bug 683684, as I already see questions popping up on the upstream forum (mostly Ubuntu users of current version 0.8.8.a-3). [1] http://bugs.debian.org/679980 [2] The functionality being that you have a tree on every page with graphs which you can expand or collapse to navigate through all possible (groups of) graphs. [3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=27;filename=replace_treeview_by_jquery.jstree.patch;att=1;bug=679980 [4] I have already filed a wish-list bug against jsquery-goodies to create a package for jstree: http://bugs.debian.org/694313 [5] http://svn.cacti.net/viewvc/cacti/branches/0.8.9/include/js/jquery/jquery.jstree.js?revision=7218content-type=text%2Fplain [6] http://svn.cacti.net/viewvc/cacti/branches/main/include/js/jquery/themes/default/ [7] http://bugs.debian.org/683684 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: tagging 683311
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 683311 + moreinfo Bug #683311 [release.debian.org] unblock: htop/1.0.1-2 Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 683311: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683311 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135435932511772.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: reassign clone of 694559 to sponsorship-requests
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # 694559 is an unblock request and an RFS, so cloning and reassigning to find # a sponsor clone 694559 -1 Bug #694559 [release.debian.org] unblock (RFS): apt-build/0.12.44 Bug 694559 cloned as bug 694853 reassign -1 sponsorship-requests Bug #694853 [release.debian.org] unblock (RFS): apt-build/0.12.44 Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'sponsorship-requests'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #694853 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #694853 to the same values previously set severity -1 important Bug #694853 [sponsorship-requests] unblock (RFS): apt-build/0.12.44 Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' retitle -1 RFS: apt-build/0.12.44 [RC] [QA] Bug #694853 [sponsorship-requests] unblock (RFS): apt-build/0.12.44 Changed Bug title to 'RFS: apt-build/0.12.44 [RC] [QA]' from 'unblock (RFS): apt-build/0.12.44' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 694559: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694559 694853: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694853 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135435958013473.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#683792: marked as done (unblock: libseccomp/1.0.0-1)
Your message dated Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:01:26 +0100 with message-id 20121201110126.gd5...@radis.cristau.org and subject line Re: Bug#683792: unblock: libseccomp/1.0.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #683792, regarding unblock: libseccomp/1.0.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 683792: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683792 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package libseccomp libseccomp just released their 1.0.0 version which has ABI changes over the earlier 0.1.0 release. This is a new library and no packages in Debian are currently build-depending on libseccomp, so the risk to the freeze is minimal. I'd like to have this 1.0.0 version in Debian for easier development work for people wanting to use libseccomp going forward. unblock libseccomp/1.0.0-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers precise-updates APT policy: (500, 'precise-updates'), (500, 'precise-security'), (500, 'precise') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-26-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 20:59:31 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 17:35:31 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package libseccomp libseccomp just released their 1.0.0 version which has ABI changes over the earlier 0.1.0 release. This is a new library and no packages in Debian are currently build-depending on libseccomp, so the risk to the freeze is minimal. I'd like to have this 1.0.0 version in Debian for easier development work for people wanting to use libseccomp going forward. Or we could just remove it from wheezy, if nothing's currently using it in the distro... I've done that, seeing how there was no followup and the 1.0.0 version is still in new. Newer libseccomp can hopefully live in wheezy-backports. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Processed: Re: Bug#694826: unblock: s390-tools/1.16.0-2
Processing control commands: tags -1 + confirmed d-i Bug #694826 [release.debian.org] unblock: s390-tools/1.16.0-2 Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed. -- 694826: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694826 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b694826.135436015417331.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#694826: unblock: s390-tools/1.16.0-2
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i On 30.11.2012 22:18, Philipp Kern wrote: The udev rules of s390-tools referred to the now non-existing udev tool vol_id. The update to 1.16.0-2 correct this and use blkid instead. This eliminates a spurious warning on-boot. Unblocked; thanks. Needs a d-i ack, so CCing KiBi. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/bd914dc8466fb24baadf93c00dc33...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#694831: marked as done (unblock: pidgin/2.10.6-2)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Dec 2012 11:10:16 + with message-id c514a419c5f5e9f277822175b942a...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#694831: unblock: pidgin/2.10.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #694831, regarding unblock: pidgin/2.10.6-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694831: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694831 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: minor User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package pidgin: diff -Nru pidgin-2.10.6/debian/changelog pidgin-2.10.6/debian/changelog --- pidgin-2.10.6/debian/changelog 2012-07-07 02:17:15.0 +0300 +++ pidgin-2.10.6/debian/changelog 2012-09-26 04:43:12.0 +0300 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +pidgin (2.10.6-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Rebuild with no changes to enable xz compression (Closes: #688692) + + -- Ari Pollak a...@debian.org Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:42:44 -0400 + pidgin (2.10.6-1) unstable; urgency=low * Imported Upstream version 2.10.6 unblock pidgin/2.10.6-2 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 30.11.2012 23:37, Bob Bib wrote: +pidgin (2.10.6-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Rebuild with no changes to enable xz compression (Closes: #688692) Unblocked. Regards, Adam---End Message---
Bug#684732: unblock: nut/2.6.4-2
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 21:50:17 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Control: retitle -1 unblock: nut/2.6.4-2.1
Upon request of Arnaud Quette, I have uploaded a NMU of nut versioned
2.6.4-2.1, which fixes RC bug #677054. The change relative to the
previous version in unstable (2.6.4-2) is that I have added a preinst
script in nut-client.
For completeness, I attach the debdiff of the new version (2.6.4-2.1)
against the version currently in Wheezy (2.6.4-1).
diff -Nru nut-2.6.4/debian/control nut-2.6.4/debian/control
--- nut-2.6.4/debian/control 2012-06-06 21:06:03.0 +0200
+++ nut-2.6.4/debian/control 2012-08-12 20:39:01.0 +0200
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
Package: nut
Architecture: all
+Section: metapackages
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, nut-server, nut-client
Description: network UPS tools - metapackage
Network UPS Tools (NUT) is a client/server monitoring system that
@@ -32,7 +33,8 @@
through the server, and are notified whenever the power status
changes.
.
- This package is a metapackage that install both nut-server and nut-client
+ This package is a metapackage that install both nut-server and nut-client,
+ in most cases it is sufficient for a basic UPS monitoring system.
s/install/s/
Package: nut-server
Architecture: any
@@ -50,12 +52,11 @@
changes.
.
This package provides NUT's core system, and the serial and USB UPS
- drivers. In most cases it is sufficient for a basic UPS monitoring
- system.
+ drivers.
Package: nut-client
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, adduser, lsb-base (= 3.0-6)
Provides: ups-monitor
Conflicts: ups-monitor, nut-server ( 2.6.3-1)
Recommends: bash-completion
diff -Nru nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-cgi.postrm nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-cgi.postrm
--- nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-cgi.postrm 2012-06-06 21:06:03.0 +0200
+++ nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-cgi.postrm 2012-08-12 20:39:01.0 +0200
@@ -44,3 +44,4 @@
#DEBHELPER#
+exit 0
Why? Changelog doesn't seem to mention it.
diff -Nru nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-client.lintian-overrides
nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-client.lintian-overrides
--- nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-client.lintian-overrides 1970-01-01
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-client.lintian-overrides 2012-08-12
20:39:01.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+nut-client: script-in-etc-init.d-not-registered-via-update-rc.d
What is that about?
diff -Nru nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-client.postinst
nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-client.postinst
--- nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-client.postinst 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
+0100
+++ nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-client.postinst 2012-08-12 20:39:01.0
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+#!/bin/sh -e
+
+case $1 in
+
+ configure)
+
+# make sure the nut user exists and has correct memberships
+if ! getent group nut /dev/null; then
+ addgroup --quiet --system nut
+fi
+if ! getent passwd nut /dev/null; then
+ adduser --quiet --system --ingroup nut --home /var/lib/nut
--no-create-home nut
+elif ! groups nut | grep -qw nut; then
+ adduser nut nut
+fi
+# for Ubuntu, while waiting for a proper debconf
+#if ! groups nut | grep -qw dialout; then
+#adduser nut dialout
+#fi
+
+# make sure that conffiles are secured and have the correct ownerships
+if [ -d /etc/nut/ ] ; then
+ chown root:nut /etc/nut/
+fi
+for file in nut.conf upsmon.conf upssched.conf ; do
+if [ -f /etc/nut/$file ] ; then
+chown root:nut /etc/nut/$file
+chmod 640 /etc/nut/$file
+fi
+done
+
I still think the chowns/chmods shouldn't be done on upgrades, if for
whatever reason the local admin changed those that's their choice.
+# make sure that /var/run/nut exists and has the correct ownerships
+if [ ! -d /var/run/nut ] ; then
+mkdir -p /var/run/nut
+fi
+if [ -d /var/run/nut ] ; then
+chown root:nut /var/run/nut
+chmod 770 /var/run/nut
+fi
+;;
+
+ abort-upgrade)
+# do nothing
+;;
+
+ abort-remove)
+# do nothing
+;;
+
+ abort-deconfigure)
+# do nothing
+;;
+
+ *)
+echo $0: incorrect arguments: $* 2
+exit 1
+;;
+
+esac
+
+#DEBHELPER#
+
+exit 0
diff -Nru nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-server.postinst
nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-server.postinst
--- nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-server.postinst 2012-06-06 21:06:03.0
+0200
+++ nut-2.6.4/debian/nut-server.postinst 2012-08-12 20:39:01.0
+0200
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
if [ -d /etc/nut/ ] ; then
chown root:nut /etc/nut/
fi
-for file in nut.conf ups.conf upsd.conf upsmon.conf upsd.users
upssched.conf ; do
+for file in ups.conf upsd.conf upsd.users ; do
if [ -f /etc/nut/$file ] ; then
chown root:nut /etc/nut/$file
chmod 640 /etc/nut/$file
@@ -50,67
Processed: tagging 684732
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 684732 + moreinfo Bug #684732 [release.debian.org] unblock: nut/2.6.4-2.1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 684732: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684732 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135436040719644.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#685230: unblock hylafax 3:6.0.6-4
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 00:27:15 +0200, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: Hi Cyril and Julien, this a diff from the version currently sitting in testing (6.0.6-1) and a possible upload to t-p-u (6.0.6-2~wheezy1). As you may see, I limited all changes to what is strictly required in order to fix two really important bugs already corrected in unstable. If you approve this, then I will upload the packages to t-p-u. Sorry for the delay. diff -ruN 6.0.6-1/debian/changelog 6.0.6-2~wheezy1/debian/changelog --- 6.0.6-1/debian/changelog2012-06-20 09:19:56.0 +0200 +++ 6.0.6-2~wheezy1/debian/changelog2012-10-13 00:12:55.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +hylafax (3:6.0.6-2~wheezy1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=high + + * Added restricted deletion flag on tmp directory (Closes: #682824) + * Update postinst and postrm scripts for hylafax-client (Closes: #661482) + + -- Giuseppe Sacco eppes...@debian.org Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:02:09 + + hylafax (3:6.0.6-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream relase. Converted to 6.0 branch instead of 6.1 since the diff -ruN 6.0.6-1/debian/hylafax-client.postinst 6.0.6-2~wheezy1/debian/hylafax-client.postinst --- 6.0.6-1/debian/hylafax-client.postinst 2012-01-16 09:31:30.0 +0100 +++ 6.0.6-2~wheezy1/debian/hylafax-client.postinst 2012-10-12 23:55:15.0 +0200 @@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ ucf $newfile /etc/hylafax/pagesizes fi +# register config file with package name to ucf +ucfr hylafax-client /etc/hylafax/pagesizes + rm -f $newfile # diff -ruN 6.0.6-1/debian/hylafax-client.postrm 6.0.6-2~wheezy1/debian/hylafax-client.postrm --- 6.0.6-1/debian/hylafax-client.postrm2010-06-20 00:29:50.0 +0200 +++ 6.0.6-2~wheezy1/debian/hylafax-client.postrm2012-10-12 23:53:34.0 +0200 @@ -4,8 +4,9 @@ if [ $1 = purge ]; then [ -d /etc/hylafax ] rm -f /etc/hylafax/pagesizes -rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /etc/hylafax -if which ucf /dev/null 21; then - ucf --purge /etc/hylafax/pagesizes -fi +#rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty /etc/hylafax + +# clear and deregister config file out from ucf database +which ucf /dev/null ucf --purge /etc/hylafax/pagesizes +which ucfr /dev/null ucfr --purge hylafax-client /etc/hylafax/pagesizes fi might want an 'exit 0' here to make sure the script doesn't exit with an error if ucfr doesn't exist. diff -ruN 6.0.6-1/debian/rules 6.0.6-2~wheezy1/debian/rules --- 6.0.6-1/debian/rules2012-06-17 14:47:42.0 +0200 +++ 6.0.6-2~wheezy1/debian/rules2012-10-13 00:08:17.0 +0200 @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ do chmod 755 $(d_server)/var/spool/hylafax/$$i; done chmod 775 $(d_server)/var/spool/hylafax chmod 4777 $(d_server)/var/spool/hylafax/tmp + chmod og+t $(d_server)/var/spool/hylafax/tmp Why a separate chmod call for the same directory? chmod 755 $(d_server)/var/spool/hylafax/dev chown uucp $(d_server)/etc/hylafax/hosts.hfaxd chmod 600 $(d_server)/etc/hylafax/hosts.hfaxd Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#694561: unblock: mathgl/1.11.2-16
On 30.11.2012 22:08, Dimitrios Eftaxiopoulos wrote: Στις Παρ 30 Νοε 2012 23:35:17 γράψατε: Apologies if I missed a pointer somewhere, but have upstream said they're happy applying the new license to 1.11.2? Unfortunately the fact that they've removed the terms for 1.11.3 doesn't automatically make the change apply retrospectively. [...] If I ask upstream to add in the texinfo/copyright.texi file a statement that the change apply retrospectively for the whole of the 1.x series, will that be OK for the FTP master team? It doesn't necessarily need to be in the file itself; a mail that can be pointed at or publicly shared or quoted should be fine too. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e94bc1bfa795501a690be081cfd3...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Processed: tagging 685230
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 685230 + moreinfo Bug #685230 [release.debian.org] unblock hylafax 3:6.0.6-4 Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 685230: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685230 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135436073721932.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#686369: unblock: grub/0.97-66.1 (pre-approval)
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:17:40 -0400, David Prévot wrote: Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: 686...@bugs.debian.org X-Debbugs-CC: debian-l10n-engl...@lists.debian.org Hi release team, I wonder if we should consider removing the grub dummy package from the grub source package. Go ahead. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#687526: reminder: unblock (pre-approval) slbackup 0.0.12-4
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:12:50 +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote: Dear Release Team, any news on my unblock request (pre-approval) of slbackup 0.0.12-4? The changes are way too invasive in my opinion. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#687617: [pre-approval] unblock: openarena with really auto-download? prompt
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:02:00 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock The ioquake3 engine has an option to auto-download missing maps, mods etc. (PK3 files) from multiplayer servers. It is off by default, but many users and mod communities encourage switching it on, since it makes playing on modified or updated multiplayer servers considerably more straightforward. Switching it on is a security risk, because PK3 files can also contain executable bytecode: it's executed in a sandbox, but that sandbox is unlikely to be perfect. In tremulous, an old fork of ioquake3 which hadn't had the benefit of some more recent ioquake3 work on hardening the sandbox environment, I turned off auto-downloading entirely. When I suggested[1] doing the same to ioquake3, which would affect openarena in main and quake3 in contrib), unanimous feedback from users and the Games Team was that they would prefer an are you sure? prompt when auto-downloading was enabled. This moves the change from ioquake3 to openarena, since it's openarena that provides the user interface. Is the rest of the user interface generally translated? I might be willing to accept this patch, but not if it means regressing l10n. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 687617
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 687617 + moreinfo Bug #687617 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: openarena with really auto-download? prompt Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 687617: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687617 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135436209731722.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#687765: marked as done (unblock: adanaxisgpl/1.2.5.dfsg.1-4.1, bzr-stats/0.1.0+bzr51-1 and gnat-gps/5.0-13)
Your message dated Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:49:16 +0100
with message-id 20121201114916.gj5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687765: unblock: adanaxisgpl/1.2.5.dfsg.1-4.1,
bzr-stats/0.1.0+bzr51-1 and gnat-gps/5.0-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #687765,
regarding unblock: adanaxisgpl/1.2.5.dfsg.1-4.1, bzr-stats/0.1.0+bzr51-1 and
gnat-gps/5.0-13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
687765: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687765
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
The packages below have a release critical bug in Debian Testing, which
is fixed in Debian Unstable. They do miss an unblock request, however:
Package adanaxisgpl/1.2.5.dfsg.1-4.1
Fixing #667094 -- adanaxisgpl: ftbfs with GCC-4.7
The debdiff is minimal and only adds -fpermissive to CXXFLAGS [1]
Package bzr-stats/0.1.0+bzr51-1
Fixing #686138 -- bzr-stats: incompatibility with bzr 2.6
This is a full maintainer upload, but the debdiff looks pretty
minimal and acceptable. However, it does some packaging related changes.
YMMV. The debdiff is attached
Package gnat-gps/5.0-13
#684194 -- gnat-gps: /u/s/d/gnat-gps is empty after upgrade from squeeze
The upload fixes the bug only. A debdiff is attached
unblock adanaxisgpl/1.2.5.dfsg.1-4.1
unblock bzr-stats/0.1.0+bzr51-1
unblock gnat-gps/5.0-13
At this point I gave up. Sometimes people are making life to you really
complicated, I understand your frustration now. :)
Here are some unblock requsts you are unlikely to accept.
Package calibre/0.8.64+dfsg-1:
Fixing #653328 -- calibre: Calibre Quick Start Guide under
Non-Commercial License
Note, the maintainer packaged a new upstream version which generates
a large delta between the Wheezy and Testing version. The RC bugfix
itself could be extracted for a t-p-u update only easily, however.
Please CC 653328 in case you won't unblock this request.
Package dnsmasq-base/2.63-3
#686694 -- dnsmasq-base: fails to install: missing Depends: adduser
There is a maintainer upload which adds a new upstream version as
well (despite the missing changelog entry mentioning that). The same as
for calibre applies here, a debdiff is not attached due to its size.
I might prepare a t-p-u NMU for these two.
unblock calibre/0.8.64+dfsg-1
unblock dnsmasq-base/2.63-3
[1]
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=10;filename=adanaxisgpl.debdiff;att=1;bug=667094
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
diff -Nru bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr48/classify.py bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr51/classify.py
--- bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr48/classify.py 2010-10-13 06:54:33.0 +0200
+++ bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr51/classify.py 2012-08-28 02:28:39.0 +0200
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
Classify a commit based on the types of files it changed.
+from __future__ import absolute_import
+
import os.path
from bzrlib import urlutils
diff -Nru bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr48/cmds.py bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr51/cmds.py
--- bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr48/cmds.py 2011-03-22 00:27:31.0 +0100
+++ bzr-stats-0.1.0+bzr51/cmds.py 2012-08-28 02:28:39.0 +0200
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
A Simple bzr plugin to generate statistics about the history.
+from __future__ import absolute_import
+
from bzrlib import (
branch,
commands,
@@ -26,6 +28,7 @@
ui,
workingtree,
)
+from bzrlib.revision import NULL_REVISION
from bzrlib.plugins.stats.classify import classify_delta
from itertools import izip
@@ -166,7 +169,10 @@
a_repo.lock_read()
try:
trace.note('getting ancestry')
-ancestry = a_repo.get_ancestry(revision)[1:]
+graph = a_repo.get_graph()
+ancestry = [
+r for (r, ps) in graph.iter_ancestry([revision])
+if ps is not None and r != NULL_REVISION]
revs, canonical_committer = get_revisions_and_committers(a_repo, ancestry)
finally:
a_repo.unlock()
@@ -183,11 +189,9 @@
pb = ui.ui_factory.nested_progress_bar()
a_repo.lock_read()
try:
-trace.note('getting ancestry 1')
-start_ancestry = set(a_repo.get_ancestry(start_rev))
-
Bug#688080: marked as done (unblock: tomoyo-tools/2.5.0-2012-0414-10)
Your message dated Sat, 1 Dec 2012 12:52:30 +0100
with message-id 20121201115230.gk5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#688080: unblock: tomoyo-tools/2.5.0-2012-0414-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #688080,
regarding unblock: tomoyo-tools/2.5.0-2012-0414-10
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
688080: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688080
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock tomoyo-tools package since it helps users with introduce
debconf, no manual configuration would be needed.
debdiff is attached below, most of lines are changelog, po files and
rename {pre,post}{inst,rm} files. Except it, 100-200 lines in maintainer
script.
diff -Nru tomoyo-tools-2.5.0-20120414/debian/README.Debian
tomoyo-tools-2.5.0-20120414/debian/README.Debian
--- tomoyo-tools-2.5.0-20120414/debian/README.Debian2012-05-26
06:21:49.0 +0900
+++ tomoyo-tools-2.5.0-20120414/debian/README.Debian2012-06-03
14:22:54.0 +0900
@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
-Kernel Support
+Kernel parameter
---
-To enable Tomoyo as the MAC security, please add security=tomoyo
-on the kernel command line. By default, you should specify it in
-/etc/default/grub file as GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX and execute update-grub
+To enable Tomoyo as the MAC security, please specify parameter to the kernel.
+By default, it will be done by package.
+.
+If you should specify it by hand, in /etc/default/grub file as
+GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=security=tomoyo and execute update-grub
+
+ -- Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.org Sat, 02 Jun 2012 12:59:34 +0900
+
diff -Nru tomoyo-tools-2.5.0-20120414/debian/changelog
tomoyo-tools-2.5.0-20120414/debian/changelog
--- tomoyo-tools-2.5.0-20120414/debian/changelog2012-05-28
08:25:05.0 +0900
+++ tomoyo-tools-2.5.0-20120414/debian/changelog2012-08-06
10:59:11.0 +0900
@@ -1,3 +1,52 @@
+tomoyo-tools (2.5.0-20120414-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ [ Christian Perrier ]
+ * Debconf templates and debian/control reviewed by the debian-l10n-
+english team as part of the Smith review project. Closes: #680088
+
+ [Debconf translation updates]
+ * Slovak (Ivan Masár). Closes: #681956
+ * Russian (Yuri Kozlov). Closes: #682131
+ * Polish (Michał Kułach). Closes: #682324
+ * Portuguese (Pedro Ribeiro). Closes: #682377
+ * Danish (Joe Hansen). Closes: #682387
+ * German (Chris Leick). Closes: #682484
+ * French (Julien Patriarca). Closes: #682498
+ * Spanish; (# traductor (campo Last-Translator) y ponga en copia a la
+lista de Javier Fernández-Sanguino). Closes: #682559
+ * Swedish (Martin Bagge / brother). Closes: #682565
+ * Czech (Miroslav Kure). Closes: #682690
+ * Italian (Beatrice Torracca). Closes: #682988
+
+ [ Hideki Yamane ]
+ * upload to unstable.
+
+ -- Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.org Mon, 06 Aug 2012 10:58:37 +0900
+
+tomoyo-tools (2.5.0-20120414-3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * debian/rules
+- add override_dh_install to exclude files
+- exec debconf-updatepo in override_dh_clean
+ * debian/tomoyo-tools.{pre,post}{inst,rm}
+- add stat.conf to CONFFILE
+- rename to tomoyo-tools.*
+ * With this release, you can enable tomoyo automatically with debconf.
+It set /etc/default/grub and exec update-grub.
+- debian/tomoyo-tools.post{inst,rm}
+ + add some line for debconf
+- debian/tomoyo-tools.{templates,config}
+ + add it to enable debconf
+- debian/control
+ + add Build-Depends: po-debconf and Pre-Depends: debconf
+- debian/README.Debian
+ + update it
+ * debian/{tomoyo-tools,libtomoyotools3}.lintian-overrides
+- add it to override no-upstream-changelog warning, upstream changelog
+ is provided as README.tomoyo file
+
+ -- Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.org Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:08:23 +0900
+
tomoyo-tools (2.5.0-20120414-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control
@@ -47,6 +96,7 @@
tomoyo-tools (2.4.0-20111025-1) experimental; urgency=low
* New upstream release (Closes: #651267)
+- deal with /run transition (Closes: #644328)
* debian/patches
- drop ld--as-needed.patch as merged to upstream
* debian/control,libtomoyotools2.{symbols,install}
diff -Nru tomoyo-tools-2.5.0-20120414/debian/control
tomoyo-tools-2.5.0-20120414/debian/control
--- tomoyo-tools-2.5.0-20120414/debian/control 2012-05-28 08:17:40.0
+0900
+++
Bug#688100: unblock: fglrx-driver/1:12-6+point-3
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 19:42:13 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Control: retitle -1 unblock: fglrx-driver/1:12-6+point-3 Hi, there are only translation updates in -3 (the 8 critical translations are complete) and a bump of the versioned Breaks: ia32-libs due to the added epoch for the post-monolithic packages. An updated diff is attached, excluding *.po* I'm not convinced this is worth it. Not closing right away in case somebody wants to give a second opinion... Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#688321: unblock: quota/4.01-1
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 17:21:32 +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package quota http://packages.qa.debian.org/q/quota.html The new version fixes Debian bug #685356, namely: repquota: Fix reporting for XFS Conversion to generic quota scanning introduced a bug for XFS where we stopped scanning after quotactl reported first error. quotactl for XFS however reports ENOENT when it has nothing to report for a particular user / group and we shouldn't stop scanning after that. We tried to test for this but the test was wrong. Fix it. The changelog diff is weird: --- quota-4.00/debian/changelog 2012-12-01 12:01:05.0 + +++ quota-4.01/debian/changelog 2012-12-01 12:01:06.0 + @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ -quota (4.00-4) unstable; urgency=low +quota (4.01-1) unstable; urgency=low - * Added upstream patch to fix problem with editing of several users. -(Closes: #670641) - * Updated packages description which was pretty outdated. -Thanks to Justin B Rye j...@edlug.org.uk (Closes: #673396) + * Imported Upstream version 4.01 (Closes: #685356) + * Adjusted patch for new upstream version. + * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3, no changes needed. + * Use Debian build flags. - -- Michael Meskes mes...@debian.org Wed, 23 May 2012 18:35:45 +0200 + -- Michael Meskes mes...@debian.org Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:51:40 +0200 quota (4.00-3) unstable; urgency=low What's up with that? Would it be possible to get *only* the xfs fix in testing instead of the whole new release? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 688321
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 688321 + moreinfo Bug #688321 [release.debian.org] unblock: quota/4.01-1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 688321: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688321 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13543635408783.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#688100: unblock: fglrx-driver/1:12-6+point-3
On 2012-12-01 13:00, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 19:42:13 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: there are only translation updates in -3 (the 8 critical translations are complete) and a bump of the versioned Breaks: ia32-libs due to the added epoch for the post-monolithic packages. I'm not convinced this is worth it. Not closing right away in case somebody wants to give a second opinion... The important changes are in -2, -3 was just fixing it up: fglrx-driver (1:12-6+point-2) unstable; urgency=low * fglrx-driver.postrm: Do not fail if the debconf templates are not available (i.e. if the package is unconfigured). * fglrx-source: Add Built-Using attribute to the generated module packages to record the exact versions of linux and fglrx-driver that were used during the build. * libgl1-fglrx-glx:i386: Add Breaks: ia32-libs ( 20120701) because that is still shipping /usr/lib32/libGL.so.1 which gets no longer diverted away. (Closes: #683853) * fglrx-atieventsd: Add Depends: glx-alternative-fglrx to ensure the triggers are processed and the glx alternative is properly setup before the atieventsd is started. (See: #684000) * Check for UNSIGNED in /etc/ati/signature during package build to prevent reappearence of bugs like #684702. * Update Homepage to point to AMD. * Update watch file. * README.Debian: Add link to unofficial bugzilla for upstream bug reports. * fglrx-driver.NEWS, libfglrx.templates: Mention the availability of fglrx-legacy-driver which supports the legacy Radeon HD 2000/3000/4000. This package is currently only in experimental but it will be provided in wheezy-backports, too. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50b9f504.5060...@abeckmann.de
Bug#694859: t-p-u pre-approval fossil/1.22.1+dfsg-0.1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I would like to ask pre-approval to upload fossil 1.22.1+dfsg-0.1 to
testing-proposed-updates. The only change is the removal of 2 non-free files
from the orig tarball. See debdiff below.
The version in unstable is 1.24-1, and the diffstat between testing and
unstable has:
157 files changed, 31399 insertions(+), 23563 deletions(-)
For reference: I uploaded fossil 1.22.1+dfsg-0.1 to mentors, and will ask for
sponsorship if I get pre-approval.
http://mentors.debian.net/package/fossil
BTW is it correct to file this as an unblock request? Reportbug knows about
requests for stable-proposed-updates, but not for t-p-u.
Thanks,
Ivo
diff -Nru fossil-1.22.1/debian/changelog fossil-1.22.1+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- fossil-1.22.1/debian/changelog 2012-03-29 10:47:49.0 +0200
+++ fossil-1.22.1+dfsg/debian/changelog 2012-12-01 13:06:52.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+fossil (1:1.22.1+dfsg-0.1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload with maintainer approval.
+ * Upload to testing for wheezy.
+ * Remove non-free src/cson_amalgamation.{c,h} from upstream tarball
+(closes: #692623, #692624).
+
+ -- Ivo De Decker ivo.dedec...@ugent.be Sat, 01 Dec 2012 12:44:37 +0100
+
fossil (1:1.22.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version
diff -Nru fossil-1.22.1/src/cson_amalgamation.c
fossil-1.22.1+dfsg/src/cson_amalgamation.c
--- fossil-1.22.1/src/cson_amalgamation.c 2012-03-17 19:30:58.0
+0100
+++ fossil-1.22.1+dfsg/src/cson_amalgamation.c 2012-12-01 12:43:54.0
+0100
@@ -1,5641 +0,0 @@
-#ifdef FOSSIL_ENABLE_JSON
contents of non-free file stripped from diff
-#endif /* FOSSIL_ENABLE_JSON */
diff -Nru fossil-1.22.1/src/cson_amalgamation.h
fossil-1.22.1+dfsg/src/cson_amalgamation.h
--- fossil-1.22.1/src/cson_amalgamation.h 2012-03-17 19:30:58.0
+0100
+++ fossil-1.22.1+dfsg/src/cson_amalgamation.h 2012-12-01 12:43:54.0
+0100
@@ -1,2506 +0,0 @@
-#ifdef FOSSIL_ENABLE_JSON
contents of non-free file stripped from diff
-#endif /* FOSSIL_ENABLE_JSON */
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121201122704.ga2...@ugent.be
Bug#688729: marked as done (unblock xpra/0.3.11+dfsg-1)
Your message dated Sat, 1 Dec 2012 13:46:44 +0100 with message-id 20121201124644.gn5...@radis.cristau.org and subject line Re: Bug#688729: unblock xpra/0.3.9+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #688729, regarding unblock xpra/0.3.11+dfsg-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 688729: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688729 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package 'xpra' This is major strategically important update. Upstream treat 0.3.x versions as most conservative bugfix-only branch. Earlier development moved to 0.4.x (deprecated) then to 0.5.x (current stable) and recently to 0.6.x (experimental). Upstream changelog (below) highlighting many important fixes for protocol and clipboard bugs rendering package unusable in some cases. According to upstream 0.3.9 is expected to be a last update to 0.3.x branch. It is providing important changes for protocol compatibility with later versions. #680244 is also expressing some concerns regarding current state of 0.3.2 in testing. As for packaging, we apologise for the number of introduced changes (see attached diff). One of the most important ones we had to do is to expose python modules publicly for interaction with frontends as xpra is both application and a module. ## Changelog: xpra (0.3.9+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low * Override dh_compress to prevent compression of example conf file. (Closes: #688235) xpra (0.3.9+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. * debian/README.Debian: Remove Known issues section, it is invalidated with 0.3.6 release. * debian/rules: Allow overriding of VER in get-orig-source. [ Dmitry Smirnov ] * debian/rules: export LDFLAGS using DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND. * debian/xpra.install: install only *.png icons. * Remove debian/parti.* (we're not shipping parti). * Publicly expose xpra modules. + Dropped private-pkg.diff patch. + debian/xpra.install: install xpra modules publicly. * debian/watch: corrected version mangle (Closes: #674964) * Removing debian/repack in favour of get-orig-source * binary and source compression to xz: + debian/rules: added override for dh_builddeb + Added debian/source/options * debian/copyright: add missing copyright paragraph. xpra (0.3.6+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low * debian/control: Added Dmitry Smirnov to Uploaders * New upstream release. (Closes: #683133) [ Dmitry Smirnov ] * Remove debian/docs * debian/copyright: + Consolidated and updated copyright info. + Update copyright format. * debian/control: added Recommends: xserver-xorg-video-dummy * debian/rules: avoid dropping LDFLAGS when passing --as-needed (fixes Hardening) * install sample 'dummy.xorg.conf' and README.Debian with instructions how to use Xdummy (Closes: #681051). * separating man pages from .install to .manpages xpra (0.3.4+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. xpra (0.3.3+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. ## ## Upstream Changelog: v0.3.9 (2012-09-08) == -- fix man page typo -- fix non bash login shell compatibility -- fix xpra screenshot argument parsing error handling v0.3.8 (2012-09-05) == -- zlib compatibility fix: use chunked decompression when supported (newer versions) v0.3.7 (2012-08-29) == -- fix zlib compression in raw packet mode: always flush the buffer -- fix big clipboard packets causing disconnection: just drop them instead -- force disconnection after irrecoverable network parsing error -- support compressed cursors -- fix incomplete cloning of attributes causing default values to be used -- fix window refresh: do not skip all windows after a hidden one! v0.3.6 (2012-08-16) == -- fix clipboard atom packing (was more noticeable with qt and Java applications) -- fix clipboard selection for non X11 clients: only 'multiple' codepath requires X11 bindings -- fix python3 build -- fix potential double free in x264 error path -- fix logging format error on window dimensions have changed.. (parameter grouping was wrong) -- fix colour bleeding with x264 (ie: green on black text) -- remove incorrect and unnecessary
Processed: retitle 688966 to unblock: midgard2-core/10.05.7.1-2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 688966 unblock: midgard2-core/10.05.7.1-2 Bug #688966 [release.debian.org] pu: Review midgard-core package Changed Bug title to 'unblock: midgard2-core/10.05.7.1-2' from 'pu: Review midgard-core package' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 688966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688966 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135436656829441.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: tagging 688966
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 688966 + moreinfo Bug #688966 [release.debian.org] unblock: midgard2-core/10.05.7.1-2 Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 688966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688966 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135436678830675.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#689003: unblock: bacula/5.2.6+dfsg-5
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:24:19 +0400, Alexander Golovko wrote: Sorry, i don't see any reply. I prepare package for wheezy, changelog here: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-bacula/bacula.git;a=blob;f=debian/changelog;h=56223bdd477cd7a52770eae92cfc5d1c857dea27;hb=wheezy i try to make each changelog record as separate commit with clean description: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-bacula/bacula.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/wheezy If i has not a mess, than all changes except one was accepted. I didn't get final reply about #556207 (see inline). I thought it was clear I'm not convinced this change is suitable. Please drop it. And i have yet another question - there was a non-maintainer upload. What package version should be now? I would much prefer if this was a 5.2.6+dfsg-7 version, uploaded to sid, and including only the approved changes, rather than a direct upload to testing. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#689147: unblock: gajim/0.15.1-1
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 18:06:53 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote: On 10/12/2012 11:31 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 16:12:55 +0200, Yann Leboulanger wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package gajim A new Gajim release fixes some bugs, and particulary the bug #682598 [0] More information can be found in the Mail I sent to debian-release mailing list: [1] debdif is available here: [2] [0]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682598 [1]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/09/msg00042.html [2]: http://lagaule.org/debian/gajim/gajim-0.15.1.debdiff unblock gajim/0.15.1-1 A few comments: - the source format change is not appropriate It's because it was in format 3.0 previously (Gajim 0.14.4), and for 0.15 I did something wrong that I wanted to repair. Moreover, I need to add a patch for your next point (change to _StreamCB) and it's nicer in format 3.0. If you really want, I can re-do the patch in old format. Yes please. - why does this drop the 0.15-1.1 changelog entry? hmm I didn't do this upload so it was not in my debian files. I've re-added it. Thanks. - what does the src/common/check_X509.py change do? string comparison and version comparison are kind of different things... Gajim 0.15 badly checks openssl version. see https://trac.gajim.org/ticket/7124 Well it's not fixed as far as I can tell, just differently wrong. Probably doesn't matter too much either way for the debian package, but still... - how is the change to _StreamCB supposed to work? there doesn't seem to be an 'obj' variable in that function It does not work. Oauth2 is not in 0.15 branch, so not usefull. But ok, I've added a patch to remove that. Thanks. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#689153: marked as done (unblock: mksh/40.9.20120630-4)
Your message dated Sat, 1 Dec 2012 14:12:07 +0100
with message-id 20121201131207.gq5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689153: unblock: mksh/40.9.20120630-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #689153,
regarding unblock: mksh/40.9.20120630-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
689153: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689153
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mksh
The upload 40.9.20120630-3 was specifically made to target wheezy;
the changes have been tested for a while now, and the diff, split
by the kind of change done, follows.
The package fixes two problems, first, the following script did not
work (regression against mksh 39) and now works again:
echo $(
echo \{
tr u x -'EOF'
price is u denar
EOF
echo }
)
This is LP#1030581.
The part of the debdiff pertaining to that is one half of the diff
to debian/patches/debian-changes (as I do that kind of stuff in CVS)
and follows here as diff against the patched source instead, for
easier review; changes to CVS keywords and the version number reported
have also been omitted:
--- mksh-40.9.20120630-2/tree.c 2012-06-28 22:18:27.0 +0200
+++ mksh-40.9.20120630-3/tree.c 2012-09-29 17:00:22.0 +0200
@@ -53,6 +53,25 @@ ptree(struct op *t, int indent, struct s
return;
switch (t-type) {
case TCOM:
+ prevent_semicolon = false;
+ /*
+* special-case 'var=EOF' (rough; see
+* exec.c:execute() for full code)
+*/
+ if (
+ /* we have zero arguments, i.e. no programme to run */
+ t-args[0] == NULL
+ /* we have exactly one variable assignment */
+ t-vars[0] != NULL t-vars[1] == NULL
+ /* we have exactly one I/O redirection */
+ t-ioact != NULL t-ioact[0] != NULL
+ t-ioact[1] == NULL
+ /* of type here document (or here string) */
+ (t-ioact[0]-flag IOTYPE) == IOHERE) {
+ fptreef(shf, indent, %S, t-vars[0]);
+ break;
+ }
+
if (t-vars) {
w = (const char **)t-vars;
while (*w)
@@ -65,7 +84,6 @@ ptree(struct op *t, int indent, struct s
fptreef(shf, indent, %S , *w++);
} else
shf_puts(#no-args# , shf);
- prevent_semicolon = false;
break;
case TEXEC:
t = t-left;
@@ -216,8 +234,10 @@ ptree(struct op *t, int indent, struct s
* often leads to an extra blank line, but it's not
* worth worrying about)
*/
- if (need_nl)
+ if (need_nl) {
shf_putc('\n', shf);
+ prevent_semicolon = true;
+ }
}
}
@@ -258,8 +278,8 @@ pioact(struct shf *shf, int indent, stru
/* name/delim are NULL when printing syntax errors */
if (type == IOHERE) {
if (iop-delim)
- fptreef(shf, indent, %S , iop-delim);
- else
+ wdvarput(shf, iop-delim, 0, WDS_TPUTS);
+ if (iop-flag IOHERESTR)
shf_putc(' ', shf);
} else if (iop-name)
fptreef(shf, indent, (iop-flag IONAMEXP) ? %s : %S ,
This part also touches the testsuite (most of it remove a space
at the end of the line):
--- mksh-40.9.20120630-2/check.t2012-09-29 17:00:14.0 +0200
+++ mksh-40.9.20120630-3/check.t2012-09-29 17:00:22.0 +0200
@@ -2268,7 +2268,13 @@ stdin:
=c $x \x40=
EOF
}
- typeset -f foo
+ fnd=$(typeset -f foo)
+ print -r -- $fnd
+ function foo {
+ echo blub
+ }
+ foo
+ eval $fnd
foo
# rather nonsensical, but…
vd==d $x \x40=
@@ -2278,11 +2284,12 @@ stdin:
print -r -- | va={$va} vb={$vb} vc={$vc} vd={$vd} ve={$ve} vf={$vf} |
expected-stdout:
function foo {
- vc= -EOF
+ vc=-EOF
=c $x \x40=
EOF
}
+ blub
| va={=a u \x40=
Bug#689425: unblock: fcitx-googlepinyin/0.1.6-1
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 21:29:30 +0800, Aron Xu wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock This is a relatively big debdiff, but most of the noise are come from the newly added svg files which show up as text files in diff. These changes are limiting the input and install icons to avoid crashing fcitx main program. Even when known issues in fcitx has already been fixed, it would be good to make fcitx-googlepinyin safer. There's another change in the package which you don't mention here. What is that about? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#689579: marked as done (unblock: dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5/0.5)
Your message dated Sat, 1 Dec 2012 14:22:31 +0100
with message-id 20121201132231.gs5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689579: unblock: dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5/0.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #689579,
regarding unblock: dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5/0.5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
689579: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689579
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5
This version fixes the grave bug#688253 i.e. unistallable
in sid.
Basically, it is a dependency problem and we need to change
dependency from obsolete vfdata-morisawa5 to texlive-lang-cjk.
Also because of this change, the package should be modified to
use TFM and/or VF files of texlive-lang-cjk so I did it too.
So debdiff output:
diff -Nru dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.4/debian/changelog
dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.5/debian/changelog
--- dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.4/debian/changelog 2008-07-23
11:20:11.0 +0900
+++ dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.5/debian/changelog 2012-10-04
09:34:58.0 +0900
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5 (0.5) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Modify to be compatible with new TeXLive2012 environment.
+So we can't use the package with vfdata-morisawa5 anymore and we removed
+vfdata-morisawa5 from Depends field.
+ * Fix a control file so that this is installable. Thanks to Andreas Beckmann
+debian AT abeckmann.de and Colin Watson cjwatson AT ubuntu.com.
+(Closes: #688253)
+ * To erase lintian warnings, we refine debian/rules a bit.
+
+ -- Atsuhito KOHDA ko...@debian.org Wed, 03 Oct 2012 14:29:25 +0900
+
dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5 (0.4) unstable; urgency=low
* Renamed fontdesc file bikan-morisawa (to bikan-morisawa5) to avoid
diff -Nru dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.4/debian/compat
dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.5/debian/compat
--- dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.4/debian/compat 2008-05-29 17:24:21.0
+0900
+++ dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.5/debian/compat 2012-10-03 14:47:06.0
+0900
@@ -1 +1 @@
-4
+6
diff -Nru dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.4/debian/control
dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.5/debian/control
--- dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.4/debian/control2008-05-29
17:31:02.0 +0900
+++ dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.5/debian/control2012-10-03
16:44:14.0 +0900
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
Package: dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5
Architecture: all
-Depends: dvi2ps (= 4.1j), vfdata-morisawa5 ( 0.0.20020122-12)
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, dvi2ps (= 5.1j), texlive-lang-cjk
Recommends: ptex-bin, okumura-clsfiles
Description: fontdesc files of dvi2ps for Morisawa Basic-5 type faces
You can convert DVI file with Morisawa Basic-5 type faces of vfdata-morisawa5
diff -Nru dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.4/debian/copyright
dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.5/debian/copyright
--- dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.4/debian/copyright 2008-05-29
17:31:02.0 +0900
+++ dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.5/debian/copyright 2012-10-03
16:44:14.0 +0900
@@ -7,6 +7,3 @@
ftp://ftp.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp/tex
and dvi2ps is in main (i.e. DFSG-compliant) so this package goes in main.
-
-Note vfdata-morisawa5, on which this package depends, changed license to
-the modified BSD.
diff -Nru dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.4/debian/dirs
dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.5/debian/dirs
--- dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.4/debian/dirs 2003-02-14 12:00:17.0
+0900
+++ dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.5/debian/dirs 2012-10-03 14:55:48.0
+0900
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-usr/share/texmf/dvi2ps
+usr/lib/dvi2ps
etc/texmf/dvi2ps
diff -Nru dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.4/debian/rules
dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.5/debian/rules
--- dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.4/debian/rules 2008-07-23 11:23:50.0
+0900
+++ dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.5/debian/rules 2012-10-03 16:40:08.0
+0900
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
# This is the debhelper compatability version to use.
PACK=dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5
-TXMF=/usr/share/texmf
+TXMF=/usr/lib
INSTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/$(PACK)$(TXMF)/dvi2ps
ETCDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/$(PACK)/etc/texmf/dvi2ps
@@ -19,7 +19,9 @@
touch configure-stamp
-build: configure-stamp build-stamp
+build: build-arch build-indep
+build-arch: configure-stamp build-stamp
+build-indep: configure-stamp build-stamp
build-stamp:
dh_testdir
diff -Nru dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5-0.4/fontsk/asc-morisawa5
Bug#689698: please unblock gupnp stack
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 13:11:03 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: Hello! About a month has passed since our last interaction, so maybe it's time for another reminder from me. Please unblock packages in the gupnp stack Not a single bug report has been filed, so there should be little worry that there is any problems caused by letting the updated packages into testing - while allowing the affected people to get compatibility fixes part of the new stable upstream releases. The thing is, these updated packages mean rather big diffs, and don't seem to close any reported bugs, according to the changelogs. So I'm afraid this isn't a very high priority. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#694862: pre-approval for audit/1:1.7.18-2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I would like to upload audit 1:1.7.18-2 based on the attached patch, which
fixes #681457.
The patch contains a backport of arm support from a newer upstream version.
However, it seems syscall audit support is not enabled in wheezy arm kernels:
- support for AUDITSYSCALL on arm was introduced after 3.2 (I tested it with a
3.6 kernel)
- AUDITSYSCALL conflicts with OABI_COMPAT, which seems to be enabled on all
debian arm kernels
If you think this change is inappropriate for wheezy, do you think #681457
should be downgraded or tagged wheezy-ignore?
In addition to the change above, the patch also adds an autoreconf script,
based on upstream svn, to get it to build without a large diff in
autogenerated files.
Cheers,
Ivo
diff -Nru audit-1.7.18/debian/autogen.sh audit-1.7.18/debian/autogen.sh
--- audit-1.7.18/debian/autogen.sh 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ audit-1.7.18/debian/autogen.sh 2012-11-24 21:51:52.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#! /bin/sh
+# based on autogen.sh in upstream 1.8 svn branch
+
+autoreconf -fv --install
+
+cd system-config-audit
+
+autopoint -f
+# intltool bug: it tries to use $aux_dir/po/Makefile.in.in in older versions
+ln -s ../po admin/po
+# ... and it puts dummy intltool-*.in to ., not to $aux_dir in newer versions
+rm admin/intltool-{extract,merge,update}.in
+touch admin/intltool-{extract,merge,update}.in
+intltoolize --force
+rm admin/po
+
+aclocal -I m4
+autoconf -Wall
+autoheader -Wall
+automake -Wall --add-missing
+
diff -Nru audit-1.7.18/debian/changelog audit-1.7.18/debian/changelog
--- audit-1.7.18/debian/changelog 2012-01-31 16:36:25.0 +0100
+++ audit-1.7.18/debian/changelog 2012-11-24 23:24:55.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+audit (1:1.7.18-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * QA upload.
+ * Set Maintainer to Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org (cf. #692492).
+ * debian/control: Add Vcs-* fields
+ * Backport patches to enable arm support (Closes: #681457)
+ * Use autoreconf to update generated files with autogen.sh based on upstream
+svn. This is necessary to build with changes in Makefile.am for arm
+support.
+
+ -- Ivo De Decker ivo.dedec...@ugent.be Sat, 24 Nov 2012 23:24:08 +0100
+
audit (1:1.7.18-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru audit-1.7.18/debian/control audit-1.7.18/debian/control
--- audit-1.7.18/debian/control 2011-07-29 23:22:06.0 +0200
+++ audit-1.7.18/debian/control 2012-11-24 21:44:49.0 +0100
@@ -1,15 +1,17 @@
Source: audit
Priority: extra
-Maintainer: Philipp Matthias Hahn pmh...@debian.org
+Maintainer: Debian QA Group packa...@qa.debian.org
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 8),
python-all-dev (= 2.6.6-3~), swig,
automake1.10, autoconf (= 2.59), libtool, autotools-dev,
intltool, cvs, libprelude-dev, libldap2-dev, libev-dev, chrpath,
- libwrap0-dev, libkrb5-dev
+ libwrap0-dev, libkrb5-dev, dh-autoreconf, autopoint
Build-Conflicts: autoconf2.13, automake1.4
Standards-Version: 3.9.2
Section: libs
Homepage: http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/audit/
+Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/audit.git
+Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/audit.git
Package: auditd
Section: admin
diff -Nru audit-1.7.18/debian/patches/arm-support.diff audit-1.7.18/debian/patches/arm-support.diff
--- audit-1.7.18/debian/patches/arm-support.diff 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ audit-1.7.18/debian/patches/arm-support.diff 2012-11-24 23:22:50.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,536 @@
+Description: arm support
+ Backport from trunk of support for arm architecture.
+
+ Please note that upstream calls this 'armeb', but it should work with the arm
+ ports in debian (armel and armhf).
+
+---
+Origin: upstream
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/681457
+Forwarded: not-needed
+Last-Update: 20121124
+
+--- audit-1.7.18.orig/lib/libaudit.h
audit-1.7.18/lib/libaudit.h
+@@ -386,7 +386,8 @@ typedef enum {
+ MACH_PPC,
+ MACH_S390X,
+ MACH_S390,
+-MACH_ALPHA
++ MACH_ALPHA,
++ MACH_ARMEB
+ } machine_t;
+
+ /* These are the valid audit failure tunable enum values */
+--- audit-1.7.18.orig/lib/lookup_table.c
audit-1.7.18/lib/lookup_table.c
+@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
+ #ifdef WITH_ALPHA
+ #include alpha_tables.h
+ #endif
++#include armeb_tables.h
+ #include i386_tables.h
+ #include ia64_tables.h
+ #include ppc_tables.h
+@@ -52,6 +53,10 @@
+ #include msg_typetabs.h
+ #include optabs.h
+
++#ifndef EM_ARM
++#define EM_ARM 40
++#endif
++
+ struct int_transtab {
+ intkey;
+ unsigned int lvalue;
+@@ -68,6 +73,7 @@ static const struct int_transtab elftab[
+ #ifdef WITH_ALPHA
+ { MACH_ALPHA, AUDIT_ARCH_ALPHA }
+ #endif
++{ MACH_ARMEB, AUDIT_ARCH_ARMEB }
+ };
+ #define AUDIT_ELF_NAMES (sizeof(elftab)/sizeof(elftab[0]))
+
+@@ -116,6 +122,9 @@ int audit_name_to_syscall(const char *sc
+ found = alpha_syscall_s2i(sc,
Bug#689973: unblock: mimedefang/2.73-2
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 18:04:05 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package mimedefang Version 2.73-2 fixes release critical Bug #688196 (piuparts). Please prepare a fix for that bug against the 2.71-2 version currently in testing. I don't think we'll upgrade to 2.73 at this point, sorry. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 689973
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 689973 + moreinfo Bug #689973 [release.debian.org] unblock: mimedefang/2.73-2 Added tag(s) moreinfo. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 689973: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689973 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.135436927216197.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#690036: marked as done (unblock: rabbitmq-server/2.8.7-1)
Your message dated Sat, 1 Dec 2012 14:46:02 +0100 with message-id 20121201134602.gv5...@radis.cristau.org and subject line Re: Bug#690036: unblock: rabbitmq-server/2.8.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #690036, regarding unblock: rabbitmq-server/2.8.7-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 690036: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690036 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package rabbitmq-server We would be grateful if you consider unblocking version 2.8.7. The differences between 2.8.4 and 2.8.7 only include bugfixes, as noted in the changelog: http://www.rabbitmq.com/changelog.html For 2.8.5: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-announce/attachments/20120802/e4ad3dd3/attachment.txt For 2.8.6: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-announce/attachments/20120822/21528820/attachment.txt For 2.8.7: http://lists.rabbitmq.com/pipermail/rabbitmq-announce/attachments/20120927/ffd77c7c/attachment.txt The 2.8.x releases were made from a stable branch. The most important fixes are to High Availability mode of operation. All of the changes in question were made upstream. It would be very unfortunate if 2.8.4 was accepted instead, because it is halfway down a stable branch of development. unblock rabbitmq-server/2.8.7-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 12:04:56 +0100, Emile Joubert wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package rabbitmq-server We would be grateful if you consider unblocking version 2.8.7. The differences between 2.8.4 and 2.8.7 only include bugfixes, as noted in the changelog: http://www.rabbitmq.com/changelog.html Looks like you now uploaded 3.0.0, with 777 files changed, 51128 insertions(+), 23582 deletions(-) against 2.8.4, and a whole new major release. Closing this bug. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#690082: marked as done (unblock: siege/2.70-4)
Your message dated Sat, 1 Dec 2012 14:47:40 +0100
with message-id 20121201134740.gw5...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#690082: unblock: siege/2.70-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #690082,
regarding unblock: siege/2.70-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
690082: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690082
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package siege
siege/2.70-4 Fixes:
#689965 siege: Enable hardened build flags
siege (2.70-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Enable hardened build flags using the hardening-wrapper
(Closes: #689965)
- debian/rules Enable the hardening-wrapper.
- debian/control Build-Depend on hardening-wrapper.
* debian/control New maintainer address. Thanks to Patrick Matthäi for
his sponsorships.
Debdiff (against siege/2.70-3 which is in testing) attached.
unblock siege/2.70-4
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_GT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=es_GT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru siege-2.70/debian/changelog siege-2.70/debian/changelog
--- siege-2.70/debian/changelog 2012-04-16 13:02:16.0 -0600
+++ siege-2.70/debian/changelog 2012-10-08 13:24:07.0 -0600
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+siege (2.70-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Enable hardened build flags using the hardening-wrapper
+(Closes: #689965)
+- debian/rules Enable the hardening-wrapper.
+- debian/control Build-Depend on hardening-wrapper.
+ * debian/control New maintainer address. Thanks to Patrick Matthäi for
+his sponsorships.
+
+ -- Josue Abarca jmasli...@debian.org Sat, 06 Oct 2012 10:47:10 -0600
+
siege (2.70-3) unstable; urgency=low
* setup.h.diff patch added in order to improve the definition of
diff -Nru siege-2.70/debian/control siege-2.70/debian/control
--- siege-2.70/debian/control 2012-04-16 13:02:16.0 -0600
+++ siege-2.70/debian/control 2012-10-08 13:24:07.0 -0600
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
Source: siege
Section: web
Priority: optional
-Maintainer: Josue Abarca jmasli...@debian.org.gt
+Maintainer: Josue Abarca jmasli...@debian.org
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7.0.50~), libssl-dev (= 0.9.8), automake1.9,
- autotools-dev (= 20100122.1)
+ autotools-dev (= 20100122.1), hardening-wrapper
Standards-Version: 3.9.3
Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/siege.git
Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/siege.git
diff -Nru siege-2.70/debian/patches/format_strings.diff siege-2.70/debian/patches/format_strings.diff
--- siege-2.70/debian/patches/format_strings.diff 1969-12-31 18:00:00.0 -0600
+++ siege-2.70/debian/patches/format_strings.diff 2012-10-08 13:24:07.0 -0600
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+Description: This patch adds string literals
+ to format strings in the snprintf function. This is required by
+ -Werror=format-security to avoid format string attacks. This pacth
+ was backported from siege beta in order to be able to use security
+ hardening build flags.
+Origin: upstream, http://www.joedog.org/pub/siege/beta/siege-beta.tar.gz
+Last-Update: 2012-10-07
+--- a/src/init.c
b/src/init.c
+@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
+* use default of ~/.siegerc */
+ if(strcmp(my.rc, ) == 0){
+ if((e = getenv(SIEGERC)) != NULL){
+- snprintf(my.rc, sizeof(my.rc), e);
++ snprintf(my.rc, sizeof(my.rc), %s, e);
+ } else {
+ snprintf(my.rc, sizeof(my.rc), %s/.siegerc, getenv(HOME));
+ if (stat(my.rc, buf) 0 errno == ENOENT) {
diff -Nru siege-2.70/debian/patches/series siege-2.70/debian/patches/series
--- siege-2.70/debian/patches/series 2012-04-16 13:02:16.0 -0600
+++ siege-2.70/debian/patches/series 2012-10-08 13:24:07.0 -0600
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@
set_verbose_to_false.diff
update_doc_about_log_file.diff
setup.h.diff
+format_strings.diff
diff -Nru siege-2.70/debian/rules siege-2.70/debian/rules
--- siege-2.70/debian/rules 2012-04-16 13:02:16.0 -0600
+++ siege-2.70/debian/rules 2012-10-08 13:24:07.0 -0600
@@ -4,6 +4,9 @@
# Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode.
#export DH_VERBOSE=1
+# Enable the hardening-wrapper
+export DEB_BUILD_HARDENING=1
+
%:
dh --with autotools_dev $@
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 13:22:29 -0600, Josue Abarca wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Bug#688100: unblock: fglrx-driver/1:12-6+point-3
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 13:16:04 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: On 2012-12-01 13:00, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 19:42:13 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: there are only translation updates in -3 (the 8 critical translations are complete) and a bump of the versioned Breaks: ia32-libs due to the added epoch for the post-monolithic packages. I'm not convinced this is worth it. Not closing right away in case somebody wants to give a second opinion... The important changes are in -2, -3 was just fixing it up: I know, and that was what I was referring to. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#694859: t-p-u pre-approval fossil/1.22.1+dfsg-0.1
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 13:27:05 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, I would like to ask pre-approval to upload fossil 1.22.1+dfsg-0.1 to testing-proposed-updates. The only change is the removal of 2 non-free files from the orig tarball. See debdiff below. The bug should be fixed in sid too. Preferrably before the upload to wheezy. Please let us know when that has happened. The version in unstable is 1.24-1, and the diffstat between testing and unstable has: 157 files changed, 31399 insertions(+), 23563 deletions(-) For reference: I uploaded fossil 1.22.1+dfsg-0.1 to mentors, and will ask for sponsorship if I get pre-approval. http://mentors.debian.net/package/fossil BTW is it correct to file this as an unblock request? Reportbug knows about requests for stable-proposed-updates, but not for t-p-u. Yes, that's fine. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#694859: t-p-u pre-approval fossil/1.22.1+dfsg-0.1
Processing control commands: tag -1 + moreinfo Bug #694859 [release.debian.org] t-p-u pre-approval fossil/1.22.1+dfsg-0.1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 694859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694859 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b694859.135437082027083.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#683292: unblock: nipy/0.2.0-1
On Sat, 01 Dec 2012, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:22:04 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: unblock nipy/0.2.0-1 Looks like this is too big and too late. Closing, sorry. taking into account that this report was opened in July, too late in particular sounds like a mockery to me making the whole freezing a farce especially given my original detailed reasoning for this freeze exception. Have a good weekend -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121201145617.gv7...@onerussian.com
Bug#688100: unblock: fglrx-driver/1:12-6+point-3
On 2012-12-01 15:02, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 13:16:04 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: On 2012-12-01 13:00, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 19:42:13 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: there are only translation updates in -3 (the 8 critical translations are complete) and a bump of the versioned Breaks: ia32-libs due to the added epoch for the post-monolithic packages. I'm not convinced this is worth it. Not closing right away in case somebody wants to give a second opinion... The important changes are in -2, -3 was just fixing it up: I know, and that was what I was referring to. The package in wheezy contains incorrect (outdated) information w.r.t. to support for legacy hardware (as it was written before AMD released the beta driver) and is therefore misleading the users on upgrades. There are also some (partial) upgrade issues with the 32-bit stuff on amd64 Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50ba2916.6050...@abeckmann.de
Bug#694859: t-p-u pre-approval fossil/1.22.1+dfsg-0.1
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo Hi Julien, Thanks for your quick response. On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 03:06:57PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: I would like to ask pre-approval to upload fossil 1.22.1+dfsg-0.1 to testing-proposed-updates. The only change is the removal of 2 non-free files from the orig tarball. See debdiff below. The bug should be fixed in sid too. Preferrably before the upload to wheezy. Please let us know when that has happened. The same change was uploaded to sid: fossil 1:1.24+dfsg-0.1 Can I do the upload to t-p-u (via a sponsor)? The version in unstable is 1.24-1, and the diffstat between testing and unstable has: 157 files changed, 31399 insertions(+), 23563 deletions(-) For reference: I uploaded fossil 1.22.1+dfsg-0.1 to mentors, and will ask for sponsorship if I get pre-approval. http://mentors.debian.net/package/fossil Cheers, Ivo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121201183140.ga7...@ugent.be
Processed: Re: Bug#694859: t-p-u pre-approval fossil/1.22.1+dfsg-0.1
Processing control commands: tag -1 - moreinfo Bug #694859 [release.debian.org] t-p-u pre-approval fossil/1.22.1+dfsg-0.1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 694859: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694859 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b694859.13543867086903.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#694859: t-p-u pre-approval fossil/1.22.1+dfsg-0.1
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 19:31:40 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: The same change was uploaded to sid: fossil 1:1.24+dfsg-0.1 Can I do the upload to t-p-u (via a sponsor)? Go ahead. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Can bug #591969 be ignored for wheezy?
Can this bug be tagged wheezy-ignore? From the bug report: Am 04.06.2012 20:38, schrieb Christian Welzel: Am 04.06.2012 12:55, schrieb Holger Levsen: On Sonntag, 3. Juni 2012, Christian Welzel wrote: These files directly correlate to some of TYPO3 content elements. Removing the swf would mean to patch TYPO3 core too. so you would like to get this bugged tagged wheezy-ignore again? If thats necessary, then yes. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#688729: unblock xpra/0.3.9+dfsg-2
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012 23:46:44 Julien Cristau wrote: Please unblock package 'xpra' Unblocked. Thank you so much Julien. Regards, Dmitry. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201212020814.43852.only...@member.fsf.org
Bug#694600: marked as done (unblock (pre-approval): kgamma/4:4.8.4-2)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Dec 2012 23:11:32 +0100
with message-id 50ba8094.9080...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#694600: unblock (pre-approval): kgamma/4:4.8.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #694600,
regarding unblock (pre-approval): kgamma/4:4.8.4-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
694600: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694600
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I would like to upload kgamma 4.8.4-2.
The only change is the backport of an upstream patch to fix the crash
of this configuration module when being run as different user than the
one currently logged in X.
Attached the current diff out of the packaging repo of the changes
above.
Thanks,
--
Pino
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index c8f3e08..8af9522 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+kgamma (4:4.8.4-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ [ Pino Toscano ]
+ * Backport upstream commit 1918f145261a52a3b2a917c6784c2cebecbb4064 to fix
+crash when run as different user (e.g. root); patch
+upstream_Fix-crash-when-XVidExtWrap-is-not-available.patch.
+(Closes: #688767)
+
+ -- Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:42:59 +0100
+
kgamma (4:4.8.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Team upload.
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
new file mode 100644
index 000..b4726e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+upstream_Fix-crash-when-XVidExtWrap-is-not-available.patch
diff --git a/debian/patches/upstream_Fix-crash-when-XVidExtWrap-is-not-available.patch b/debian/patches/upstream_Fix-crash-when-XVidExtWrap-is-not-available.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..abe8479
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/upstream_Fix-crash-when-XVidExtWrap-is-not-available.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+From 1918f145261a52a3b2a917c6784c2cebecbb4064 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Christoph Feck christ...@maxiom.de
+Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 02:19:01 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH] Fix crash when XVidExtWrap is not available
+
+This can happen when run as root
+BUG: 292335
+FIXED-IN: 4.10
+---
+ kcmkgamma/kgamma.cpp | 10 +-
+ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/kcmkgamma/kgamma.cpp b/kcmkgamma/kgamma.cpp
+index ffe29ea..890ba99 100644
+--- a/kcmkgamma/kgamma.cpp
b/kcmkgamma/kgamma.cpp
+@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ KGamma::KGamma(QWidget* parent_P, const QVariantList )
+ :KCModule(KGammaConfigFactory::componentData(), parent_P), rootProcess(0)
+ {
+ bool ok;
+- GammaCorrection = true;
++ GammaCorrection = false;
+ xv = new XVidExtWrap(ok, NULL);
+ if (ok) { /* KDE 4: Uneccessary test, when all KCM wrappers do conditional loading */
+ xv-getGamma(XVidExtWrap::Red, ok);
+@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ KGamma::KGamma(QWidget* parent_P, const QVariantList )
+ xv-setScreen(currentScreen);
+
+ rootProcess = new KProcess;
++ GammaCorrection = true;
+ setupUI();
+ saved = false;
+
+@@ -107,10 +108,9 @@ KGamma::KGamma(QWidget* parent_P, const QVariantList )
+ }
+ load();
+ }
+-else { //something is wrong, show only error message
+- GammaCorrection = false;
+- setupUI();
+-}
++ }
++ if (!GammaCorrection) { //something is wrong, show only error message
++setupUI();
+ }
+ }
+
+--
+1.7.10.4
+
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 2012-11-28 21:02, Pino Toscano wrote:
[...]
Thanks, it was uploaded some hours ago and it build almost everywhere.
Unblocked, thanks.
~Niels---End Message---
Bug#694578: marked as done (unblock (pre-approval): okular/4.8.4-3)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Dec 2012 23:10:14 +0100
with message-id 50ba8046.4080...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#694578: unblock (pre-approval): okular/4.8.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #694578,
regarding unblock (pre-approval): okular/4.8.4-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
694578: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694578
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please (pre-approve) unblock package okular
einclude/attach the debdiff against the package in testing)
This packages solves:
- #680946, severity important, avoiding different versions of libokularcore and
okular at the same time. The first 3 entries in the changelog are part of this
fix.
Three commits backported from upstream to solve:
- the extraction of the page bounding box, used by the trimming function;
- restore word detection in DVI documents;
- avoid a crash with broken fonts.
Diffstat:
changelog |
22 +
control |
3
patches/avoid_crash_with_broken_fonts.diff |
31 ++
patches/fix_word_detection_with_dvi_docs.diff |
153 ++
patches/series |
3
patches/upstream_Call-Generator-signalPixmapRequestDone-_after_-savin.patch |
40 ++
6 files changed, 251 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Kinds regards, Lisandro.
unblock okular/4.8.4-3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru okular-4.8.4/debian/changelog okular-4.8.4/debian/changelog
--- okular-4.8.4/debian/changelog 2012-06-20 14:37:55.0 -0300
+++ okular-4.8.4/debian/changelog 2012-11-27 20:41:58.0 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,25 @@
+okular (4:4.8.4-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ [ Pino Toscano ]
+ * Force okular to depend on the same version of libokularcore, as it uses
+internal API of it.
+ * Make libokularcore break okular 4.8, as with 4.8 a private symbol used
+by the okularpart has been dropped.
+ * The two changes above will make sure to avoid different versions of
+libokularcore and okular at the same time. (Closes: #680946)
+ * Backport upstream commit edbb4ef9f5aa8f120558b9d4f4b9f68970100c4b to fix
+the extraction of the page bounding box, used by the trimming function;
+patch upstream_Call-Generator-signalPixmapRequestDone-_after_-savin.patch.
+(Closes: #686642)
+
+ [ Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer ]
+ * Backport upstream commit 91e46331fd7901705a69323c75de84e2467416dd to restore
+word detection in DVI documents. Thanks Luigi Toscano.
+ * Backport upstream commit 823a84942df4d3604b041ef7878a9984b1f12b7f to avoid
+a crash with broken fonts. Thanks Luigi Toscano.
+
+ -- Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:24:28 +0200
+
okular (4:4.8.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Team upload.
diff -Nru okular-4.8.4/debian/control okular-4.8.4/debian/control
--- okular-4.8.4/debian/control 2012-06-20 14:06:57.0 -0300
+++ okular-4.8.4/debian/control 2012-11-27 20:41:58.0 -0300
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
Section: libs
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Breaks: okular ( 4:4.8)
Description: libraries for the Okular document viewer
This package contains libraries used by the Okular document viewer.
.
@@ -37,7 +38,7 @@
Package: okular
Section: graphics
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, libokularcore1 (= ${binary:Version})
Suggests: okular-extra-backends (= ${binary:Version}), texlive-binaries, unrar, poppler-data, ghostscript, jovie
Provides: pdf-viewer, postscript-viewer
Description: universal document viewer
diff -Nru okular-4.8.4/debian/patches/avoid_crash_with_broken_fonts.diff okular-4.8.4/debian/patches/avoid_crash_with_broken_fonts.diff
--- okular-4.8.4/debian/patches/avoid_crash_with_broken_fonts.diff 1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 -0300
+++ okular-4.8.4/debian/patches/avoid_crash_with_broken_fonts.diff 2012-11-27 20:41:58.0 -0300
@@
Bug#694807: marked as done (unblock: manpages-fr-extra/20121129)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Dec 2012 23:16:55 +0100
with message-id 50ba81d7.7050...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#694807: unblock: manpages-fr-extra/20121129
has caused the Debian Bug report #694807,
regarding unblock: manpages-fr-extra/20121129
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
694807: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694807
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package manpages-fr-extra, it's just a translation
update, that aim to track the tiny documentation changed made in
ldconfig(8) inside eglibc 2.13-36 recently unblocked in Wheezy
(since the documentation translation is outsourced in this package).
We also made some proofread in other translations, and continued to
update the openssl one too (thus the tiny build change picked up from
openssl upstream).
The attached debdiff spares you the po4a (translations) change.
unblock manpages-fr-extra/20121129
Thanks in advance for considering it.
Regards
David
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (100,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru --exclude po4a manpages-fr-extra-20121027/debian/changelog manpages-fr-extra-20121129/debian/changelog
--- manpages-fr-extra-20121027/debian/changelog 2012-10-27 11:05:48.0 -0400
+++ manpages-fr-extra-20121129/debian/changelog 2012-11-29 11:27:36.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,22 @@
+manpages-fr-extra (20121129) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * openssl:
+- Handle section 7 and 5 of manual pages
+- New translation of some files:
+ + CMS_final.3
+ + CMS_sign_receipt.3
+ + CMS_verify_receipt.3
+ + d2i_DSAPublicKey.3
+ + SSL_CTX_set_cert_store.3
+ + SSL_set_session.3
+ + ui_compat.3
+ + des_modes.7
+ * sysvinit: Sync with version 2.88dsf-34
+ * eglibc: Sync with version 2.13-37
+ * util-linux, tar: Typo and format fixes
+
+ -- David Prévot taf...@debian.org Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:25:01 -0400
+
manpages-fr-extra (20121027) unstable; urgency=low
[ Thomas Blein ]
diff -Nru --exclude po4a manpages-fr-extra-20121027/eglibc/C/man8/ldconfig.8 manpages-fr-extra-20121129/eglibc/C/man8/ldconfig.8
--- manpages-fr-extra-20121027/eglibc/C/man8/ldconfig.8 2012-10-26 18:35:07.0 -0400
+++ manpages-fr-extra-20121129/eglibc/C/man8/ldconfig.8 2012-11-29 11:19:06.0 -0400
@@ -140,8 +140,7 @@
execution time linker/loader
.TP 20
.B /etc/ld.so.conf
-File containing a list of colon, space, tab, newline, or comma separated
-directories in which to search for libraries.
+File containing a list of newline separated directories in which to search for libraries.
.TP 20
.B /etc/ld.so.cache
File containing an ordered list of libraries found in the directories
diff -Nru --exclude po4a manpages-fr-extra-20121027/eglibc/VERSION manpages-fr-extra-20121129/eglibc/VERSION
--- manpages-fr-extra-20121027/eglibc/VERSION 2012-10-26 18:35:07.0 -0400
+++ manpages-fr-extra-20121129/eglibc/VERSION 2012-11-29 11:21:58.0 -0400
@@ -1 +1 @@
-2.13-35
+2.13-37
diff -Nru --exclude po4a manpages-fr-extra-20121027/openssl/extract-section.pl manpages-fr-extra-20121129/openssl/extract-section.pl
--- manpages-fr-extra-20121027/openssl/extract-section.pl 1969-12-31 20:00:00.0 -0400
+++ manpages-fr-extra-20121129/openssl/extract-section.pl 2012-11-27 15:53:22.0 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+#!/usr/bin/perl
+
+while(STDIN) {
+ if (/=for\s+comment\s+openssl_manual_section:(\S+)/)
+ {
+ print $1\n;
+ exit 0;
+ }
+}
+
+print $ARGV[0]\n;
+
diff -Nru --exclude po4a manpages-fr-extra-20121027/openssl/Makefile manpages-fr-extra-20121129/openssl/Makefile
--- manpages-fr-extra-20121027/openssl/Makefile 2011-07-03 20:22:19.0 -0400
+++ manpages-fr-extra-20121129/openssl/Makefile 2012-11-27 15:53:22.0 -0400
@@ -17,21 +17,23 @@
post-build: man1 man3
man1:
- mkdir -p fr/man1
+ mkdir -p fr/man1 fr/man5
@set -e; \
for m in fr/apps/*.pod; do \
+ sec=`$(PERL) ./extract-section.pl 1 $$m`; \
man=$$(basename $$m); \
man=$${man%.pod}; \
- $(P2M) --section=1SSL $$m fr/man1/$$man.1ssl; \
+ $(P2M) --section=$${sec}SSL $$m fr/man$$sec/$$man.$$secssl; \
done
man3:
- mkdir -p fr/man3
+
Bug#694614: tpu: cairo-dock/3.0.0-3 (pre-approval)
Hi,
I attched updated debdiff.
V2;
- Fix typo rigin to Origin in patches.
- Revert Update debhelper to 9.
change version from 9 to 7 of debian/compat and version of debhelper.
Could you check ?
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwama...@nigauri.org wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 10:20 AM, David Prévot taf...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Le 30/11/2012 21:05, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu a écrit :
- Enable hardening build
- Update debhelper = 9, Add dpkg-dev (= 1.16.1~)
As much as I like the hardening effort, I think we're too late in the
freeze for such a change (unless it was explicitly requested by the
security team, maybe).
Why? Release team still accepts change to the release goal.
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
Well, “changes for release goals, *if they are not invasive*”. Rule #1
provides an explicit but non-exhaustive list of those inappropriate
changes, including “Changing debhelper compat version”.
Oh, I see. I will revise.
Thanks!
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
GPG ID: 40AD1FA6
cairo-dock-3.0.0-3.debdiff
Description: Binary data
Bug#694568: marked as done (unblock openscenegraph/3.0.1-4)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Dec 2012 23:32:37 +0100 with message-id 50ba8585.40...@thykier.net and subject line Re: Bug#694568: unblock openscenegraph/3.0.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #694568, regarding unblock openscenegraph/3.0.1-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 694568: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694568 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Requesting an unblock after thread: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/11/msg00808.html debdiff attached. Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com debdiff_openscenegraph-3.0.1-3_to_-4.diff Description: Binary data ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 2012-11-27 22:41, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Requesting an unblock after thread: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/11/msg00808.html debdiff attached. Cheers. Unblocked, thanks. ~Niels---End Message---
Bug#693077: marked as done (unblock: glusterfs/3.2.7-3)
Your message dated Sat, 01 Dec 2012 23:46:59 +0100 with message-id 50ba88e3.3000...@thykier.net and subject line Re: Bug#693077: unblock: glusterfs/3.2.7-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #693077, regarding unblock: glusterfs/3.2.7-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 693077: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693077 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package glusterfs See bug #691595 - there is an stupid and faulty duplication of starting the glusterd daemon in the init script. Just fixed by removing the useless lines. diff -Naur '--exclude=.svn' 3.2.7-2/debian/changelog 3.2.7-3/debian/changelog --- 3.2.7-2/debian/changelog2012-07-22 14:18:52.0 +0200 +++ 3.2.7-3/debian/changelog2012-11-12 20:37:46.218864002 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +glusterfs (3.2.7-3) unstable; urgency=low + + * Remove duplicated and faulty call of the glusterd daemon from the init +script. +Closes: #691595 + + -- Patrick Matthäi pmatth...@debian.org Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:23:32 +0100 + glusterfs (3.2.7-2) unstable; urgency=low * Add upstream patch 03-glusterd-crash-gcc-optimizations, which fixes a crash diff -Naur '--exclude=.svn' 3.2.7-2/debian/glusterfs-server.init 3.2.7-3/debian/glusterfs-server.init --- 3.2.7-2/debian/glusterfs-server.init2012-07-22 14:18:52.0 +0200 +++ 3.2.7-3/debian/glusterfs-server.init2012-11-12 20:37:46.218864002 +0100 @@ -43,8 +43,6 @@ log_daemon_msg Starting glusterd service glusterd start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --oknodo --pidfile $PIDFILE --startas $DAEMON -- -p $PIDFILE $GLUSTERD_OPTS log_end_msg $? - start_daemon -p $PIDFILE $DAEMON -f $CONFIGFILE - return $? fi } unblock glusterfs/3.2.7-3 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 2012-11-12 20:57, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package glusterfs See bug #691595 - there is an stupid and faulty duplication of starting the glusterd daemon in the init script. Just fixed by removing the useless lines. [...] unblock glusterfs/3.2.7-3 [...] Unblocked, thanks. ~Niels---End Message---
Bug#694901: unblock: manpages/3.44-1
Hi,
Le 01/12/2012 19:07, David Prévot a écrit :
Please unblock package manpages, it fixes an important issue in the
Debian-specific part of the package (#691414, see motd.5.diff attached).
Since it's a documentation only package, it has also been updated, the
attached diff spares you most of these documentation changes.
Sorry, I meant to send an even more filtered one, please consider the
two diff attached to this message.
unblock manpages/3.44-1
Thanks (a lot) in advance for considering it, and please note that the
French translation is ready too (fixing the important Debian-specific
issue), so I may bug you again if you agree with this unblock:
unblock manpages-fr/3.44d1p1-1
Cheers
David
--- manpages-3.44.orig/man5/motd.5
+++ manpages-3.44/man5/motd.5
@@ -28,17 +28,29 @@
motd \- message of the day
.SH DESCRIPTION
The contents of \fI/etc/motd\fP are displayed by
-.BR login (1)
+.BR pam_motd (8)
after a successful login but just before it executes the login shell.
The abbreviation motd stands for message of the day, and this file
has been traditionally used for exactly that (it requires much less disk
space than mail to all users).
+
+On Debian GNU/Linux, the content of
+.I /run/motd.dynamic
+is also displayed.
+This file is generated by
+.I /etc/init.d/motd
+at boot.
.SH FILES
-/etc/motd
+.I /etc/motd
+.br
+.I /run/motd.dynamic
+.br
+.I /etc/init.d/motd
.SH SEE ALSO
.BR login (1),
.BR issue (5)
+.BR pam_motd(8)
.SH COLOPHON
This page is part of release 3.44 of the Linux
.I man-pages
diff -Nru --exclude 'man?' --exclude 'Changes*' --exclude 'man-pages-*' manpages-3.42/debian/changelog manpages-3.44/debian/changelog
--- manpages-3.42/debian/changelog 2012-12-01 18:36:00.0 -0400
+++ manpages-3.44/debian/changelog 2012-12-01 18:36:00.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,23 @@
+manpages (3.44-1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Imported Upstream version 3.44: (Closes: #692595)
+. new manpages: getauxval.3 secure_getenv.3
+. major update to delete_module.2 init_module.2 prctl.2 getauxval.3 proc.5
+. fts.3: Improve description of physical vs. logical (Closes: #633505)
+. getdomainname.2: these calls relate to NIS, not DNS (Closes: #295635)
+. proc.5: fix 'starttime' description of /proc/PID/stat (Closes: #675891)
+. ptrace.2: Clarify some operations are not present on all
+ architectures (Closes: #122383)
+ * motd.5 updated and motd.tail removed: due to new behaviour of sysvinit
+2.88dsf-24 (Closes: #691414)
+ * Add glibc-doc-reference to package description (Closes: #640764)
+ * fputs.3: missing space in putc(c,stdout) (Closes: #693255)
+ * resolv.conf.5: Document IPv6 format for nameserver (Closes: #610036)
+ * stat.2: Clarify description of EOVERFLOW error (Closes: #604928)
+ * Ack my NMUs (Closes: #651476, #670874)
+
+ -- Simon Paillard spaill...@debian.org Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:56:48 +0100
+
manpages (3.42-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Simon Paillard ]
diff -Nru --exclude 'man?' --exclude 'Changes*' --exclude 'man-pages-*' manpages-3.42/debian/check-conflicts manpages-3.44/debian/check-conflicts
--- manpages-3.42/debian/check-conflicts 1969-12-31 20:00:00.0 -0400
+++ manpages-3.44/debian/check-conflicts 2012-12-01 18:36:00.0 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+
+BASEMAN=/usr/share/man
+
+which apt-file /dev/null 21
+if [ $? -ne 0 ] ; then
+ echo apt-file is required 12 ;
+ exit 1
+fi
+
+echo -e WARNING: This tool assumes apt-file has been updated based on sid\n 12 ;
+
+
+for j in man*/*.* ;
+ do (dpkg -S $BASEMAN/$j.gz 2/dev/null || apt-file search $BASEMAN/$j.gz) \
+ | grep -v '^manpages:' \
+ | grep -v '^manpages-dev:' ;
+done
diff -Nru --exclude 'man?' --exclude 'Changes*' --exclude 'man-pages-*' manpages-3.42/debian/control manpages-3.44/debian/control
--- manpages-3.42/debian/control 2012-12-01 18:36:00.0 -0400
+++ manpages-3.44/debian/control 2012-12-01 18:36:00.0 -0400
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
Priority: important
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7)
Standards-Version: 3.9.3
-Vcs-Browser: http://cvs.infodrom.org/manpages/?cvsroot=debian
-Vcs-CVS: :pserver:anonym...@cvs.infofrom.org:/var/cvs/debian manpages
+Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/manpages.git
+Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/manpages.git
Homepage: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Package: manpages
@@ -39,4 +39,4 @@
these two sections:
2 = Linux system calls.
3 = Library calls (note that a more comprehensive source of information
- may be found in the glibc-doc package).
+ may be found in the glibc-doc and glibc-doc-reference packages).
diff -Nru --exclude 'man?' --exclude 'Changes*' --exclude 'man-pages-*' manpages-3.42/debian/inst manpages-3.44/debian/inst
--- manpages-3.42/debian/inst 2012-12-01 18:36:00.0 -0400
+++ manpages-3.44/debian/inst 2012-12-01 18:36:00.0 -0400
@@ -15,13 +15,15 @@
for j in $i/*.*; do
echo -n ${j#*/}
case ${j#*/} in
-
