Bug#706488: RM: boinc-server-maker/7.0.27
Hi Steffen, On Tue, April 30, 2013 22:07, Steffen Moeller wrote: The PHP code shipping with the BOINC Server Maker package was not updated for a long time because of the freeze coinciding with the general overhaul the BOINC package structure. An important security update was missed. The package does not impose any security risk upon installation. And every regular BOINC server maintainer needed to manually update their installation. Do you have a reference to more information on this security issue (bug report, upstream info, ..)? thanks, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/a4d74a0adda1af55a3ed9a46d223f081.squir...@aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl
Bug#706488: Aw: Re: Bug#706488: RM: boinc-server-maker/7.0.27
I looked around but could not find the most prominent report that once made it into German local TV. Maybe someone else can help out. Our later BOINC packages do not build the boinc-server-maker package any more. Respective (updated) experimental bits go into .. experimental. Steffen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/trinity-705ff7a8-6bc0-477c-8486-7c65bd0973bd-1367399680309@3capp-gmx-bs48
Bug#706488: RM: boinc-server-maker/7.0.27
Hi, These missed server issues were presumably what's now CVE-2013-2018: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.oss.general/10083 - Alyssa -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130501101716.gi1...@li141-249.members.linode.com
Bug#706546: unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package httrack from sid to testing/wheezy, or block current testing/wheezy version if this is too late (which is something I am fearing) As reminder, httrack is a website copier (ie. same category as wget) The current stable/squeeze version (3.43.9-1) is a bit old, and has several bugs: - random corruption of files during updates (#607704) - random crash when interrupting a mirror (#657878) - buffer overflow while repairing cache (#614966) But OTOH, the current testing/wheezy release (3.46.1-1) also has serious issues: - random closing of files/sockets, leading to break randomly download of files of produce files with garbage (#706535) ; 3.46 and 3.43 issue - UTF-8 conversion bug on Linux that may lead to buggy filenames and invalid filenames in current working directory (#706536) ; 3.46 speficic issue - memory leak in hashtable, that may lead to excessive memory consumption (#706537) ; 3.46 and 3.43 issue BUG #706536 (testing-version specific) is especially annoying, as it randomly breaks downloaded filenames if they contain non-ascii characters, and can create garbage files in current working directory (might be more than important). BUG #706535 (stable/testing specific, fixed in sid) is also annoying (random breakage of downloaded files), but impacts all versions prior to sid. I therefore would suggest either to accept current SID version (3.47.7-1) in testing, or, considering the very late delay (and the fact that the sid version is new), blocking the testing version. The diff between stable and sid is important, due to new features (such as UTF-8 filenames handling), but the diff between testing and sid is reasonnable. Sorry for the very late notification - I have been tricked by the timing again! -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.7 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.8.4-grsec (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130501124155.30672.95173.reportbug@proliant.localnet
Processed: Re: Bug#706546: unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1
Processing control commands: tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #706546 [release.debian.org] unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 706546: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706546 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b706546.13674128737149.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#706546: unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi, On 2013-05-01 13:41, Xavier Roche wrote: Please unblock package httrack from sid to testing/wheezy, or block current testing/wheezy version if this is too late (which is something I am fearing) What do you mean by block [the] current testing/wheezy version? (Removal?) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/bbab4d4e30002bd4d6e9906aab972...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#706553: nmu: scribus_1.4.2.dfsg+r18267-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu scribus_1.4.2.dfsg+r18267-1 . amd64 . -m Rebuild in a clean Debian sid environment. Once again a package built on ??? was uploaded to sid: scribus/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libpodofo0.9.1 Can't locate libpodofo0.9.1, sid has libpodofo0.9.0 and a rebuild works fine. May have been a local package or a build on Ubuntu. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130501134937.9439.57788.report...@cake.ae.cs.uni-frankfurt.de
Bug#706546: unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1
Le 01/05/2013 14:54, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : What do you mean by block [the] current testing/wheezy version? (Removal?) No, move the old package (3.43.9-1) in wheezy - not sure this is possible either considering the late date. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51811d42.2070...@httrack.com
Bug#706488: RM: boinc-server-maker/7.0.27
On Wed, May 1, 2013 12:17, Alyssa Milburn wrote: These missed server issues were presumably what's now CVE-2013-2018: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.oss.general/10083 Thanks, noted. Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2703629283f91c611de96e59e1831b3c.squir...@aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl
Bug#706546: unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51812c3b.4030...@httrack.com
Processed: Re: Bug#706546: unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1
Processing control commands: tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #706546 [release.debian.org] unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 706546: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706546 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b706546.136742000727787.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#706546: unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1
On 2013-05-01 14:48, Xavier Roche wrote: Le 01/05/2013 14:54, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : What do you mean by block [the] current testing/wheezy version? (Removal?) No, move the old package (3.43.9-1) in wheezy - not sure this is possible either considering the late date. That's not really practical at this point, no. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/91b0f924b81810cffa13d9193e655...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#706546: unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1
Le 01/05/2013 17:01, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : That's not really practical at this point, no. Yep, seems logical. Then we can either let the 3.46.1-1 release (and have an update later - in such case please close this ticket) or unblock 3.47.7-1 when possible. Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51812f7a.40...@httrack.com
Bug#691988: marked as done (unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15)
Your message dated Wed, 01 May 2013 19:43:42 +0100 with message-id 1367433822.28602.5.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#691988: Re: Bug#691988: pre-approve unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15 has caused the Debian Bug report #691988, regarding unblock: libpam-ssh/1.92-15 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 691988: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691988 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Dear release team managers, please pre-approve the unblock of libpam-ssh/1.92-15 in view to encourage potential sponsor to upload it for reintroduction. libpam-ssh was removed because some easy to fix RC bugs persisted due to its unofficial orphan state. This pacakge is already in Squeeze, and bug reports have been filled to request its reintroduction to ( #664177 ). This minimal version purposely fixes only these easy to fix RC bugs: it is meant for Wheezy, hence my request. Note that an upstream version of the package with ECDSA support is ready to be uploaded, but it is meant for Jessie. Jerome unblock libpam-ssh/1.92-15 -- System Information: Debian Release: Wheezy* APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.23-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 11:46 +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: As reported in #685614 and #664177, libpam-ssh is important for some computer and cluster setup; for example, it can be used to mount the home partition on cluster using sshfs. So its absence in Wheezy may cause some troubles during the coming upgrade as it is already in Squeeze; according to popcon, libpam-ssh has grossly 400 users. *insert large flashing there is no precedent being set here signs. possibly with hooters too.* After some careful procrastination, and considering the fact that no further uploads have been necessary, I've decided to unblock the package. Hopefully that turns out to be the right decision. :-) Regards, Adam---End Message---
Bug#685880: please ship wheezy with Ekiga 4.0
On Sat, 2013-04-20 at 15:58 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 16:25 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: but I think it's something that should seriously be considered. Otherwise Ekiga should be considered from removal from wheezy, as there is no way security patches can be maintained for that old release onwards. Huge is accurate; even my attempts at filtering the diffs for a couple of the packages still left several kLOCS of diff. :-( I realise we haven't particularly helped by not replying earlier; I suspect that was largely because we were also unsure what to do for the best. Unfortunately, this request demonstrates our dislike for making decisions that people will dislike. In any case, I think it's clearly too late to be accepting the new versions of the packages in to wheezy. We could therefore do with input from interested parties as to which is the better solution betwen shipping the versions of ekiga et al currently in wheezy, or no versions at all. This may (or may not) be influenced by: For reference, removing ekiga, opal and ptlib would also require dropping gnugk, h323plus, openam and t38modem. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1367434033.28602.9.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#706380: unblock: clutter-gst/1.5.4-1+build1
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 706380 = pu retitle 706380 pu: clutter-gst/1.5.4-1+build1 thanks On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 14:17 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Please unblock package clutter-gst No-change rebuild to clear binNMU state and restore multiarch co-installability. At the risk of sounding like a broken record, - r1. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1367434595.28602.17.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#706386: unblock: lua-sql/2.3.0-1+build1
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 706386 + pu retitle 706386 pu: lua-sql/2.3.0-1+build1~deb7u1 thanks On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 15:17 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Please unblock package lua-sql No-change rebuild to clear binNMU state and restore multiarch co-installability. As with the other packages, I'm afraid at this point I'm opting to address this via a point release. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1367434511.28602.15.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#706387: unblock: myodbc/5.1.10-2+build1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). usertags 706387 + pu Usertags were: unblock. Usertags are now: unblock pu. retitle 706387 pu: myodbc/5.1.10-2+build1~deb7u1 (?) Bug #706387 [release.debian.org] unblock: myodbc/5.1.10-2+build1 Changed Bug title to 'pu: myodbc/5.1.10-2+build1~deb7u1 (?)' from 'unblock: myodbc/5.1.10-2+build1' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 706387: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706387 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13674343862195.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#706387: unblock: myodbc/5.1.10-2+build1
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 706387 + pu retitle 706387 pu: myodbc/5.1.10-2+build1~deb7u1 (?) thanks On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 15:29 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Please unblock package myodbc No-change rebuild to clear binNMU state and restore multiarch co-installability. Given the closeness of the release and the fact that library has several r-deps (including LO), I'm opting to defer this until the first point release. If we can get the updated package accepted relatively early after the release, that will give us some time to iron out any issues. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1367434378.28602.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#706386: unblock: lua-sql/2.3.0-1+build1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). usertags 706386 + pu Usertags were: unblock. Usertags are now: unblock pu. retitle 706386 pu: lua-sql/2.3.0-1+build1~deb7u1 Bug #706386 [release.debian.org] unblock: lua-sql/2.3.0-1+build1 Changed Bug title to 'pu: lua-sql/2.3.0-1+build1~deb7u1' from 'unblock: lua-sql/2.3.0-1+build1' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 706386: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706386 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13674345193100.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#706380: unblock: clutter-gst/1.5.4-1+build1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). usertags 706380 = pu Usertags were: unblock. Usertags are now: pu. retitle 706380 pu: clutter-gst/1.5.4-1+build1 Bug #706380 [release.debian.org] unblock: clutter-gst/1.5.4-1+build1 Changed Bug title to 'pu: clutter-gst/1.5.4-1+build1' from 'unblock: clutter-gst/1.5.4-1+build1' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 706380: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706380 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13674346033917.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#706546: marked as done (unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1)
Your message dated Wed, 01 May 2013 20:10:38 +0100 with message-id 1367435438.28602.20.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#706546: unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #706546, regarding unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 706546: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706546 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package httrack from sid to testing/wheezy, or block current testing/wheezy version if this is too late (which is something I am fearing) As reminder, httrack is a website copier (ie. same category as wget) The current stable/squeeze version (3.43.9-1) is a bit old, and has several bugs: - random corruption of files during updates (#607704) - random crash when interrupting a mirror (#657878) - buffer overflow while repairing cache (#614966) But OTOH, the current testing/wheezy release (3.46.1-1) also has serious issues: - random closing of files/sockets, leading to break randomly download of files of produce files with garbage (#706535) ; 3.46 and 3.43 issue - UTF-8 conversion bug on Linux that may lead to buggy filenames and invalid filenames in current working directory (#706536) ; 3.46 speficic issue - memory leak in hashtable, that may lead to excessive memory consumption (#706537) ; 3.46 and 3.43 issue BUG #706536 (testing-version specific) is especially annoying, as it randomly breaks downloaded filenames if they contain non-ascii characters, and can create garbage files in current working directory (might be more than important). BUG #706535 (stable/testing specific, fixed in sid) is also annoying (random breakage of downloaded files), but impacts all versions prior to sid. I therefore would suggest either to accept current SID version (3.47.7-1) in testing, or, considering the very late delay (and the fact that the sid version is new), blocking the testing version. The diff between stable and sid is important, due to new features (such as UTF-8 filenames handling), but the diff between testing and sid is reasonnable. Sorry for the very late notification - I have been tricked by the timing again! -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.7 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.8.4-grsec (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 17:06 +0200, Xavier Roche wrote: Le 01/05/2013 17:01, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : That's not really practical at this point, no. Yep, seems logical. Then we can either let the 3.46.1-1 release (and have an update later - in such case please close this ticket) or unblock 3.47.7-1 when possible. Looking through the upload history, there appear to have been nine uploads in around two weeks. On that basis, I'm afraid I'm not particularly happy to unblock the package at this point. Let's stick with 3.46.1-1 for now and revisit which fixes might be suitable for a stable update after the release. Regards, Adam---End Message---
Bug#698502: unblock: glusterfs/3.2.7-4
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 698502 = pu retitle 698502 pu: glusterfs/3.2.7-3+deb7u1 thanks On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 00:24 +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Upstream just said these days, that the HEAD fix may also be unsecure/incomplete/broken/whatever, if this patch is not QA acceptable. Also some gluterfs developers stated, that they have not got the time for working on this issue and that people seeing problems may fix it better. I think it's clear at this point that we won't be accepting the current package for the release. Let's look at it again afterwards to see if we can fix it via a point release. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1367435693.28602.23.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#698502: unblock: glusterfs/3.2.7-4
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). usertags 698502 = pu Usertags were: unblock. Usertags are now: pu. retitle 698502 pu: glusterfs/3.2.7-3+deb7u1 Bug #698502 [release.debian.org] unblock: glusterfs/3.2.7-4 Changed Bug title to 'pu: glusterfs/3.2.7-3+deb7u1' from 'unblock: glusterfs/3.2.7-4' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 698502: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698502 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.136743570111965.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#704601: unblock: hdf5/1.8.8-9.1
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 704601 = pu retitle 704601 pu: hdf5/1.8.8-9+deb7u1 thanks On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 14:36 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Please unblock package hdf5 This update fixes several upgrade issues (see #667599 and duplicates) involving hdf5. While it is not a perfect solution (there are still some upgrade paths failing), it is an improvement over what is currently in wheezy. A better solution would require significant reorganization of the hdf5 package stack. Unfortunately our procrastination over this means it'll have to wait until a point release now. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1367435800.28602.24.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#704601: unblock: hdf5/1.8.8-9.1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). usertags 704601 = pu Usertags were: unblock. Usertags are now: pu. retitle 704601 pu: hdf5/1.8.8-9+deb7u1 Bug #704601 [release.debian.org] unblock: hdf5/1.8.8-9.1 Changed Bug title to 'pu: hdf5/1.8.8-9+deb7u1' from 'unblock: hdf5/1.8.8-9.1' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 704601: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704601 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.136743580712947.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#706435: unblock: readline5/5.2+dfsg-2
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 706435 = pu retitle 706435 pu: readline5/5.2+dfsg-1+deb7u1 thanks On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 11:05 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Please unblock package readline5 fixes a multiarch regression in the +dfsg-1 upload Given the closeness of the release and the fact that readline5 has several r-deps, I'm opting to defer this until the first point release. If we can get the updated package accepted relatively early after the release, that will give us some time to iron out any issues. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1367435898.28602.25.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#706435: unblock: readline5/5.2+dfsg-2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). usertags 706435 = pu Usertags were: unblock. Usertags are now: pu. retitle 706435 pu: readline5/5.2+dfsg-1+deb7u1 Bug #706435 [release.debian.org] unblock: readline5/5.2+dfsg-2 Changed Bug title to 'pu: readline5/5.2+dfsg-1+deb7u1' from 'unblock: readline5/5.2+dfsg-2' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 706435: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706435 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.136743590513789.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#695201: marked as done (wheezy-ignore tag for RC bug #693577 in libfso-glib)
Your message dated Wed, 01 May 2013 21:02:39 +0100 with message-id 1367438559.28602.39.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#695201: Bug#704222: release.debian.org: Request for wheezy-ignore tag: bug #693577 (libfso-glib: not properly built from source) has caused the Debian Bug report #695201, regarding wheezy-ignore tag for RC bug #693577 in libfso-glib to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 695201: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695201 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Please add a wheezy-ignore tag for #693577, rationale: Fixing this will change the ABI, resulting in a transition. It will require upstream work to fix properly. The package still builds fine. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 693577 + wheezy-can-defer tags 693577 + wheezy-ignore thanks On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 17:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [Ugh, apologies for not having got back to this sooner] On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 21:20 +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote: [...] 4. ignore everything for wheezy Let's stop procrastinating, and just do that. Regards, Adam---End Message---
Bug#704222: marked as done (release.debian.org: Request for wheezy-ignore tag: bug #693577 (libfso-glib: not properly built from source))
Your message dated Wed, 01 May 2013 21:02:39 +0100 with message-id 1367438559.28602.39.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#695201: Bug#704222: release.debian.org: Request for wheezy-ignore tag: bug #693577 (libfso-glib: not properly built from source) has caused the Debian Bug report #695201, regarding release.debian.org: Request for wheezy-ignore tag: bug #693577 (libfso-glib: not properly built from source) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 695201: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695201 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, Fixing #693577 in wheezy requires either a transition or a reupload of fso-specs in an older version (which is my fault :(). I suggest to add a wheezy-ignore tag to bug #693577. I also think this is a serious bug, but IMHO it's acceptable to use upstream's pregenerated source code for wheezy. P.S.: Sorry for the late request. I thought it had already been done. -- Sebastian ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 693577 + wheezy-can-defer tags 693577 + wheezy-ignore thanks On Sun, 2013-04-28 at 17:49 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [Ugh, apologies for not having got back to this sooner] On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 21:20 +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote: [...] 4. ignore everything for wheezy Let's stop procrastinating, and just do that. Regards, Adam---End Message---
Processed: closing 697706
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # What an odd typo close 697706 Bug #697706 [release.debian.org] RM: elementary/0.7.0.55225-1 Marked Bug as done thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 697706: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697706 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.136744087716570.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#706488: RM: boinc-server-maker/7.0.27
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 21:23 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 22:07 +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: Please kindly remove boinc-server-maker from the distribution. We can't remove individual binary packages, and it's too late to accept an upload via unstable that stops building it. So we either ship the boinc source currently in wheezy as-is, or we don't. Gentle ping? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1367440911.28602.42.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#706480: unblock: openjdk-6/6b27-1.12.5-1 and openjdk-7/7u21-2.3.9-3
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 18:48 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: 7u3-2.1.7-1 did still build the cacao VM, which is now disabled, and replaced by a transitional package. the cacao VM for openjdk-7 currently is not as stable as the one for openjdk-6, and trying to re-enable it caused build failures on i386 and s390. The changelogs are attached. It looks like the transitional icedtea-7-jre-cacao isn't built on powerpc? Either it needs to be, or you need to ask ftp-master to remove the 7u21-2.3.9-2 binary package. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1367442105.28602.44.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#706546: unblock: httrack/3.47.9-1
Hi, Le 01/05/2013 21:10, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : Let's stick with 3.46.1-1 for now and revisit which fixes might be suitable for a stable update after the release. Yup, that's probably safer ; current state is not totally perfect currently (there are still icons-related issues remaining). Thanks, Xavier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51818270.5070...@httrack.com
Bug#706553: marked as done (nmu: scribus_1.4.2.dfsg+r18267-1)
Your message dated Wed, 01 May 2013 22:22:33 +0100 with message-id 1367443353.28602.46.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Re: Bug#706553: nmu: scribus_1.4.2.dfsg+r18267-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #706553, regarding nmu: scribus_1.4.2.dfsg+r18267-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 706553: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706553 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu scribus_1.4.2.dfsg+r18267-1 . amd64 . -m Rebuild in a clean Debian sid environment. Once again a package built on ??? was uploaded to sid: scribus/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libpodofo0.9.1 Can't locate libpodofo0.9.1, sid has libpodofo0.9.0 and a rebuild works fine. May have been a local package or a build on Ubuntu. Andreas ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 15:49 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: nmu scribus_1.4.2.dfsg+r18267-1 . amd64 . -m Rebuild in a clean Debian sid environment. Once again a package built on ??? was uploaded to sid: scribus/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libpodofo0.9.1 Can't locate libpodofo0.9.1, sid has libpodofo0.9.0 and a rebuild works fine. May have been a local package or a build on Ubuntu. Scheduled. Regards, Adam---End Message---
Help with Wheezy CD testing on Saturday
Hi folks, As we're expecting to release this Saturday (4th May) and I'm going to be preparing the CDs and DVDs to go with the release, it would be lovely if we have some volunteers to help test the images. We have been doing testing of the daily, weekly and Release Candidate images as they're produced, but it would be nice to get more coverage in the testing, especially: * non-PC architectures * more obscure combinations of options like partitioning, filesystems etc. * different desktops with differing package sets I've started a wiki page at https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianCD/ReleaseTesting/Wheezy and I'll be filling in more details there in the next couple of days, including some specific configurations that I'd like to see tested. If you can help us test on Saturday, please take a look and join me in #debian-cd where we'll be coordinating. Cheers, -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Managing a volunteer open source project is a lot like herding kittens, except the kittens randomly appear and disappear because they have day jobs. -- Matt Mackall -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130502012910.gb28...@einval.com
Bug#706480: unblock: openjdk-6/6b27-1.12.5-1 and openjdk-7/7u21-2.3.9-3
Am 01.05.2013 23:01, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 18:48 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: 7u3-2.1.7-1 did still build the cacao VM, which is now disabled, and replaced by a transitional package. the cacao VM for openjdk-7 currently is not as stable as the one for openjdk-6, and trying to re-enable it caused build failures on i386 and s390. The changelogs are attached. It looks like the transitional icedtea-7-jre-cacao isn't built on powerpc? Either it needs to be, or you need to ask ftp-master to remove the 7u21-2.3.9-2 binary package. hmm, the package should build, and I think it does so, however it seems like the buildd doesn't identify the build environment as wheezy. the lsb-release file seems to be up to date, but not the base-files package. I'm preparing a new upload now, which builds this transitional package for wheezy and sid, however I don't like the idea that there are buildd setups which differ in such basic ways. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5181c268.9070...@ubuntu.com
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-5.3_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-5.3_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-5.3_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-5.3_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-5.3_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-5.3_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-5.3_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-5.3_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: strongswan_4.4.1-5.3_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1uxlqg-0005ig...@franck.debian.org
