Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 16:18:38 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Since libx264 is largely subsumed by libav, I think it makes very much sense to do them both at the same time. I am convinced that we will have less effort this way. OK, feel free to go ahead with both. (As discussed with Reinhard) Please add remove mplayer/2:1.0~rc4.dfsg1+svn34540-1 trying: -mplayer skipped: -mplayer (12 - 73) got: 5+0: i-5 * i386: devede, photofilmstrip, toonloop Should those rdeps be removed too? All three packages depend on mencoder, which has been deprecated and is essentially unmaintained by upstream for years. As I do have strong concerns that mencoder makes it for jessie release, I would suggest to remove mencoder, and all depending packages such as devede, photofilmstrip or toonloop, for now until some solution is found in order to speed up the libav9 transition. -- regards, Reinhard
Processed: tagging 704032
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 704032 + pending Bug #704032 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults 1.54 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 704032: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704032 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.137681592225563.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: Bug#720062: www.debian.org: http://release.debian.org/migration/ does not work / is not understandable
reassign 720062 release.debian.org retitle 720062 migration page output unclear user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 720062 + tools On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 07:11 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal debian-www don't maintain the pages you mentioned. The clue is that they're under release.debian.org. :-) I maintain goobox. It had a release critical bug which I just downgraded because I cannot reproduce it and the submitter does not answer anymore on my questions. Now the version in sid should be able to migrate to testing. However, it is still blocked. The list of RC bugs that the BTS provides to britney for testing migration is updated four times a day - at 00:00, 06:00, 12:00 and 18:00 UTC. You downgraded the bug at 20:00, so when britney ran at 22:00 UTC she was unaware of the downgrading. The next britney run is in a few minutes time at which point the bug will no longer be a blocker. So I follow the PTS to: http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=goobox Here I read: goobox depends on libcam-dev which is not available in testing First: The link from libcam-dev does not work: Not Found The requested URL /migration/testing.pl?package=libcam-dev was not found on this server. Yes, that's unfortunate. Secondly, libcam-dev is in testing: http://packages.debian.org/jessie/libcam-dev Yes, but. The link in question is in a section headed Dependency analysis (including build-depends; i386 only):. libcam-dev _does not exist_ on i386: libcam-dev | 9.1+ds1-3 |testing | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 So this page has broken links and incorrect information. No. Some of the links don't work (they should be translated to source packages) and some of the information is confusingly presented. The information is /not/ incorrect. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1376820094.32416.31.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#720062: www.debian.org: http://release.debian.org/migration/ does not work / is not understandable
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reassign 720062 release.debian.org Bug #720062 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: http://release.debian.org/migration/ does not work / is not understandable Bug reassigned from package 'www.debian.org' to 'release.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #720062 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #720062 to the same values previously set retitle 720062 migration page output unclear Bug #720062 [release.debian.org] www.debian.org: http://release.debian.org/migration/ does not work / is not understandable Changed Bug title to 'migration page output unclear' from 'www.debian.org: http://release.debian.org/migration/ does not work / is not understandable' user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). usertags 720062 + tools There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: tools. On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 07:11 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Package: www.debian.org Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Severity: normal Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. debian-www don't maintain the pages you mentioned. The clue is that Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. they're under release.debian.org. :-) Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. Too many unknown commands, stopping here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 720062: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720062 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.137682010619264.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#720062: www.debian.org: http://release.debian.org/migration/ does not work / is not understandable
Hello Adam, On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:01:34AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: reassign 720062 release.debian.org retitle 720062 migration page output unclear user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 720062 + tools On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 07:11 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal debian-www don't maintain the pages you mentioned. The clue is that they're under release.debian.org. :-) Thanks. I was wondering for some time as well which package to report at. I maintain goobox. It had a release critical bug which I just downgraded because I cannot reproduce it and the submitter does not answer anymore on my questions. Now the version in sid should be able to migrate to testing. However, it is still blocked. The list of RC bugs that the BTS provides to britney for testing migration is updated four times a day - at 00:00, 06:00, 12:00 and 18:00 UTC. You downgraded the bug at 20:00, so when britney ran at 22:00 UTC she was unaware of the downgrading. The next britney run is in a few minutes time at which point the bug will no longer be a blocker. Thanks for your explanation. I assumed that it already happened and looking at that page made me believe it was another issue. Secondly, libcam-dev is in testing: http://packages.debian.org/jessie/libcam-dev Yes, but. The link in question is in a section headed Dependency analysis (including build-depends; i386 only):. libcam-dev _does not exist_ on i386: libcam-dev | 9.1+ds1-3 |testing | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 Dooh, of course. (I knew that when I was working on alpha ...) Thanks Helge -- Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de Dipl.-Phys. http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php 64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred Help keep free software libre: http://www.ffii.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Release Goal: Switch to OpenJDK7
Hello, I would like to propose the following release goal to the release team for Jessie: https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/OpenJDK7 While the OpenJDK 7 switch is done in unstable, there are still packages depending on OpenJDK 6. This release goal will also include the removal of OpenJDK 6 from the archive. I am willing to be the advocate for this task. And I am proposing to reuse the tag: openjdk-7-transition / ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Thanks, Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5210d4be.8090...@debian.org
Re: Release Goal: Switch to OpenJDK7
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 16:05:50 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Hello, I would like to propose the following release goal to the release team for Jessie: https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/OpenJDK7 Why does this need to be a release goal? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#710708: marked as done (transition: gtksourceview3)
Your message dated Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:29:43 +0200 with message-id 20130818222943.gm4...@betterave.cristau.org and subject line Re: Bug#710708: transition: gtksourceview3 has caused the Debian Bug report #710708, regarding transition: gtksourceview3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 710708: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710708 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition gtksourceview3 bumped the SONAME because some symbols were dropped from the ABI. Those symbols were private though and were not exposed in public headers, so there should be no fallout from this. Simple binNMUs should do the trick just fine. Ben file: title = gtksourceview3; is_affected = .depends ~ libgtksourceview-3.0-0 | .depends ~ libgtksourceview-3.0-1; is_good = .depends ~ libgtksourceview-3.0-1; is_bad = .depends ~ libgtksourceview-3.0-0; -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (800, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.8-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 20:41:52 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition gtksourceview3 bumped the SONAME because some symbols were dropped from the ABI. Those symbols were private though and were not exposed in public headers, so there should be no fallout from this. Simple binNMUs should do the trick just fine. All done. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#720125: pu: package intel-microcode/1.20130808.0+deb7u1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear stable release manager(s), There is a need to update the intel-microcode package in stable: Intel released a microcode update package that fixes several nasty processor errata, including a critical issue. The errata are present on just about every Intel Core and Core-based Xeon processors since the 1st gen i3/i5/i7 and Xeons since Nehalem. I've added a full description of the worst processor erratum the microcode update fixes in the relevant debian changelog. Intel classified this microcode update as a security fix, but I've asked the security team about it and they feel this is best addressed through stable-proposed-updates due to the non-free nature of intel-microcode. Please refer to the attached diff. I have ommited the upstream microcode data changes from the diff to make it an easier read. All changes present in the diff have been tested in unstable and testing for a couple months without any issues reported. They're necessary to avoid the need for a reboot (or manual intervention) to apply the microcode. Please verify whether the proposed changes would be acceptable for an upload to stable. I have *not* included the changes required to fix bug #716917 in this update, however if you feel I should do so, I can prepare an update that would also fix #716917 in stable. Thank you. diffstat: changelog | 23 debian/changelog| 49 debian/intel-microcode.kpreinst | 28 debian/intel-microcode.postinst | 31 microcode-20130808.dat |14880 ++-- 5 files changed, 9846 insertions(+), 5165 deletions(-) -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.1 APT prefers proposed-updates APT policy: (990, 'proposed-updates'), (990, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.4.58+ (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh diff --git a/changelog b/changelog index 16c601f..10ad8a2 100644 --- a/changelog +++ b/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,26 @@ +2013-08-08: + * New Microcodes: +sig 0x000306c3, pf mask 0x32, 2013-07-02, rev 0x0012, size 19456 +sig 0x000306e4, pf mask 0xed, 2013-06-13, rev 0x0415, size 11264 +sig 0x000306e6, pf mask 0xed, 2013-06-19, rev 0x0600, size 11264 +sig 0x00040651, pf mask 0x72, 2013-07-02, rev 0x0015, size 18432 + + * Updated Microcodes (removed in the past): +sig 0x000106a5, pf mask 0x03, 2013-06-21, rev 0x0019, size 10240 + + * Updated Microcodes: +sig 0x000106a4, pf mask 0x03, 2013-06-21, rev 0x0012, size 14336 +sig 0x000106e5, pf mask 0x13, 2013-07-01, rev 0x0006, size 7168 +sig 0x00020652, pf mask 0x12, 2013-06-26, rev 0x000e, size 8192 +sig 0x00020655, pf mask 0x92, 2013-06-28, rev 0x0004, size 3072 +sig 0x000206a7, pf mask 0x12, 2013-06-12, rev 0x0029, size 10240 +sig 0x000206d7, pf mask 0x6d, 2013-06-17, rev 0x0710, size 17408 +sig 0x000206f2, pf mask 0x05, 2013-06-18, rev 0x0037, size 13312 +sig 0x000306a9, pf mask 0x12, 2013-06-13, rev 0x0019, size 12288 + + * Removed Microcodes: +sig 0x000106e4, pf mask 0x09, 2010-03-08, rev 0x0002, size 5120 + 2013-02-22: * Updated Microcodes: sig 0x000306a9, pf mask 0x12, 2013-01-09, rev 0x0017, size 11264 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 247bf7c..ce4ce71 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,52 @@ +intel-microcode (1.20130808.0+deb7u1) stable; urgency=high + + * New upstream microcode data file 20130808 ++ New Microcodes: + sig 0x000306c3, pf mask 0x32, 2013-07-02, rev 0x0012, size 19456 + sig 0x000306e4, pf mask 0xed, 2013-06-13, rev 0x0415, size 11264 + sig 0x000306e6, pf mask 0xed, 2013-06-19, rev 0x0600, size 11264 + sig 0x00040651, pf mask 0x72, 2013-07-02, rev 0x0015, size 18432 ++ Updated Microcodes (removed in the past): + sig 0x000106a5, pf mask 0x03, 2013-06-21, rev 0x0019, size 10240 ++ Updated Microcodes: + sig 0x000106a4, pf mask 0x03, 2013-06-21, rev 0x0012, size 14336 + sig 0x000106e5, pf mask 0x13, 2013-07-01, rev 0x0006, size 7168 + sig 0x00020652, pf mask 0x12, 2013-06-26, rev 0x000e, size 8192 + sig 0x00020655, pf mask 0x92, 2013-06-28, rev 0x0004, size 3072 + sig 0x000206a7, pf mask 0x12, 2013-06-12, rev 0x0029, size 10240 + sig 0x000206d7, pf mask 0x6d, 2013-06-17, rev 0x0710, size 17408 + sig 0x000206f2, pf mask 0x05, 2013-06-18, rev 0x0037, size 13312 + sig 0x000306a9, pf mask 0x12, 2013-06-13, rev 0x0019, size 12288 ++ Removed Microcodes: + sig 0x000106e4, pf mask 0x09, 2010-03-08,
Minor bug fix in wheezy.
Hello, I'm recently adopted KDE-Telepathy (under the supervision of the debian pkg kde extras team.) A user reported a minor localiazation bug with the older version in stable: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=715199 It seems like it would be especially annoying because its a grammatically incorrect phrase on the main window. The KDE packaging team thought this was an unlikely to be approved as an update to wheezy, but sincie the proposed updates wiki page does suggest asking the stable release team I thought I'd at least ask you. The bug is fixed in the new version uploaded to unstable (0.6.3). Is this something that can go through proposed updates for wheezy to fix 0.4.0? My proposed update is below pulled from my git repository as a branch from the debian/0.4.0-1 tag. Diane diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 91404f9..4d837bd 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +ktp-contact-list (0.4.0-1.1~fixes) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + * Add fix_es_localization.patch (Closes #715199) + + -- Diane Trout di...@ghic.org Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:38:26 -0700 + ktp-contact-list (0.4.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * Initial release. diff --git a/debian/patches/fix_es_localization.patch b/debian/patches/fix_es_localization.patch new file mode 100644 index 000..89f34e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches/fix_es_localization.patch @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +Author: Diane Trout di...@ghic.org +Description: Fix locatization typo. Fixed in upstream by 0.6.3 + +--- a/po/es/ktp-contactlist.po b/po/es/ktp-contactlist.po +@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ + #. i18n: ectx: property (windowTitle), widget (QMainWindow, MainWindow) + #: rc.cpp:98 + msgid KDE IM Contacts +-msgstr Contados de MI para KDE ++msgstr Contactos de MI para KDE + + #: rooms-model.cpp:72 + msgid Password required diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series new file mode 100644 index 000..57bd3a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches/series @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +fix_es_localization.patch signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#704032: Csound caught in boost transition
Hi all, I'm in the process of updating csound to version 6 (actually, I started a bit before this transition), and that has happened a lot less smoothly than I had hoped. Feel free to remove csound and qutecsound (the only libcsound rdep) from testing in order to advance this transition. Csound is FTBFS for reasons unrelated to this transition in many archs. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caafdzj8o7autbpbvy4abtr-rwyhkfyoxacod40ok9zgn0pe...@mail.gmail.com
