Re: PHP security upload not included in 6.0.9
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.ukwrote: On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 01:38 +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote: I saw the happy notice about 6.0.9 release, and wondered why isn't php5 (5.3.3-7+squeeze18) part of this update (uploaded in December). This was due to the fact that the package has not yet successfully built on kfreebsd-*, as can be seen from https://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/oldstable.html Thanks Adam. 1. First time I encounter this problem, any idea where can I see the buildd logs for these security uploads to see why haven't they built fine. 2. I see there are only a few of similar cases, would be nice to have them caught and generate some notification - finding out only when a fix doesn't go into a stable update sounds expensive to me (project benefit wise). Kaplan
Re: PHP security upload not included in 6.0.9
Hi Lior, On Mon, February 17, 2014 09:45, Lior Kaplan wrote: 1. First time I encounter this problem, any idea where can I see the buildd logs for these security uploads to see why haven't they built fine. The security team receives those. I'll forward them to you for this case. 2. I see there are only a few of similar cases, would be nice to have them caught and generate some notification - finding out only when a fix doesn't go into a stable update sounds expensive to me (project benefit wise). In general terms, the security team monitors what builds fail and tries to involve the respective porters and maintainers; it seems in this case that wasn't (yet) done. I would expect the buildd admins to also actively monitor what fails on their archs but I'm not sure that actually happens for all archs. Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/9d47579c117b833d7e671cad7fed4228.squir...@aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl
Re: PHP security upload not included in 6.0.9
On 2014-02-17 8:45, Lior Kaplan wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 01:38 +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote:
I saw the happy notice about 6.0.9 release, and wondered why
isn't
php5 (5.3.3-7+squeeze18) part of this update (uploaded in
December).
This was due to the fact that the package has not yet successfully
built
on kfreebsd-*, as can be seen from
https://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/oldstable.html [1]
Thanks Adam.
1. First time I encounter this problem, any idea where can I see the
buildd logs for these security uploads to see why haven't they built
fine.
Logs for security builds aren't publicly available; you could try asking
the security team.
2. I see there are only a few of similar cases, would be nice to have
them caught and generate some notification
The security team periodically check for packages that are available in
the security archive but have not made it to ftp-master. In this case
the packages aren't available in the security archive either; I'd expect
that they also check those.
- finding out only when a fix doesn't go into a stable update sounds
expensive to me (project benefit wise).
Having the fixes included in a stable update is mostly convenience. The
packages are already available (at least on the architectures where they
build okay) from the security archive, which everyone running
{old,}stable should be checking.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/ccd7f45654011a82bb7a3138e8e2b...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi release team, Please bear with me as this is my very first binNMU request. I need to have the hdf5 source package rebuilt in wheezy in order to fix #739261. This is because the current hdf5 release in wheezy was built with a gfortran older than the one currently in wheezy. nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable -m Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261) Many thanks in advance, _g. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTAeWrAAoJEO/obGx//s+Dg+QH/jtBfwpXaBGUul3rK8+3f7jx bqL3T+Kh0zyTZKBDiVJFdCJ5ciu3TJtuEuATGqNgErArnlViVRSpg0FJKchVHvZG MIQd+/Jj9ywCXX2PdwNTuzAR37/O/KD91b6BcV2yYnIX3WaPYd2snGylgtF8mbjT YN1nxXkM/tQm08ccE6qWcvD9/2y9w3ust+5dTvaV2xxyiW3m89UOmpM7RIZvzaWN KBECXzrBqRV1gt9JQfpdudYJPWZ0RCugtjcHXeykjq4jrRl5q0KF56R5l5WuxEHB gfOPvXL4XTwjky8UwND2jqLU+Hwe932dxfVF5+k9RbaE8+wlz8N7D9GhVrrz4pg= =gasF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140217103436.31884.7378.report...@pini.bou-fi.net
Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
Gilles Filippini wrote, On 17/02/2014 11:34: Please bear with me as this is my very first binNMU request. I need to have the hdf5 source package rebuilt in wheezy in order to fix #739261. This is because the current hdf5 release in wheezy was built with a gfortran older than the one currently in wheezy. nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable -m Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261) Ah sorry, I've seen a syntax mistake just after pushing send (missing '.'). The nmu line should read: nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable . -m Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261) Thanks, _g. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:46:39AM +0100, Gilles Filippini wrote: Gilles Filippini wrote, On 17/02/2014 11:34: Please bear with me as this is my very first binNMU request. I need to have the hdf5 source package rebuilt in wheezy in order to fix #739261. This is because the current hdf5 release in wheezy was built with a gfortran older than the one currently in wheezy. nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable -m Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261) Ah sorry, I've seen a syntax mistake just after pushing send (missing '.'). The nmu line should read: nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable . -m Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261) Are there plans to make libhdf5-serial-dev work again, aka #706044? - S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140217111548.gr9...@casco.aei.mpg.de
Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
Hi Steffen, Steffen Grunewald wrote, On 17/02/2014 12:15: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:46:39AM +0100, Gilles Filippini wrote: Gilles Filippini wrote, On 17/02/2014 11:34: Please bear with me as this is my very first binNMU request. I need to have the hdf5 source package rebuilt in wheezy in order to fix #739261. This is because the current hdf5 release in wheezy was built with a gfortran older than the one currently in wheezy. nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable -m Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261) Ah sorry, I've seen a syntax mistake just after pushing send (missing '.'). The nmu line should read: nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable . -m Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261) Are there plans to make libhdf5-serial-dev work again, aka #706044? I hadn't. But this is indeed a good opportunity to fix it as well. So the plan would be to upload to stable a fix for #706044 which would close #739266 by the way. Am I reading you correctly? Thanks, _g. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: testing migration status of nvidia-graphics-drivers [non-free]
On 2014-02-03 14:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 2014-02-03 12:52, Andreas Beckmann wrote: I'm a bit confused about the testing migration status of nvidia-graphics-drivers. [...] 319.76 does have armhf binaries, 319.82 does not have these, but I had them removed from unstable early enough to avoid blockage. nvidia-settings still has armhf binaries and depends on nvidia-alternative (which no longer does). How could I find this information myself? Anyway, nvidia-settings has been updated in sid to not build armhf for now and the outdated armhf binaries were just removed, so this will fix automatically in a few days (unless someone ages nvidia-settings which is at 6/10). Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/53020d7d.6020...@debian.org
Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
Steffen Grunewald wrote, On 17/02/2014 14:03: Hi Gilles, nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable . -m Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261) Are there plans to make libhdf5-serial-dev work again, aka #706044? I hadn't. But this is indeed a good opportunity to fix it as well. So the plan would be to upload to stable a fix for #706044 which would close #739266 by the way. Am I reading you correctly? If that could be done, we'd get rid of a quite nasty issue, indeed. (I still have no idea how #706044 could slip through during Wheezy freeze.) Thanks, Thank you - there are quite some people around who would be very happy! Let's go this way then. It is currently building on my box. Then would retitling this bug as pu: ... be sufficient? _g. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: cloning 734528 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: clone 734528 -1 Bug #734528 [ftp.debian.org] RM: libghc-optparse-applicative-dev [sparc], libghc-optparse-applicative-prof [sparc], yesod [sparc] -- ROM; transitively broken build-deps Bug 734528 cloned as bug 739291 739291 was not blocked by any bugs. 739291 was blocking: 729531 Added blocking bug(s) of 739291: 729531 retitle 734528 RM: haskell-optparse-applicative [sparc] -- ROM; transitively broken build-deps Bug #734528 [ftp.debian.org] RM: libghc-optparse-applicative-dev [sparc], libghc-optparse-applicative-prof [sparc], yesod [sparc] -- ROM; transitively broken build-deps Changed Bug title to 'RM: haskell-optparse-applicative [sparc] -- ROM; transitively broken build-deps' from 'RM: libghc-optparse-applicative-dev [sparc], libghc-optparse-applicative-prof [sparc], yesod [sparc] -- ROM; transitively broken build-deps' retitle -1 RM: haskell-yesod-bin [sparc] -- ROM; transitively broken build-deps Bug #739291 [ftp.debian.org] RM: libghc-optparse-applicative-dev [sparc], libghc-optparse-applicative-prof [sparc], yesod [sparc] -- ROM; transitively broken build-deps Changed Bug title to 'RM: haskell-yesod-bin [sparc] -- ROM; transitively broken build-deps' from 'RM: libghc-optparse-applicative-dev [sparc], libghc-optparse-applicative-prof [sparc], yesod [sparc] -- ROM; transitively broken build-deps' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 734528: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734528 739291: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739291 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.139264429119347.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
On 2014-02-17 13:27, Gilles Filippini wrote: Steffen Grunewald wrote, On 17/02/2014 14:03: Hi Gilles, nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable . -m Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261) Are there plans to make libhdf5-serial-dev work again, aka #706044? I hadn't. But this is indeed a good opportunity to fix it as well. So the plan would be to upload to stable a fix for #706044 which would close #739266 by the way. Am I reading you correctly? If that could be done, we'd get rid of a quite nasty issue, indeed. (I still have no idea how #706044 could slip through during Wheezy freeze.) Thanks, Thank you - there are quite some people around who would be very happy! Let's go this way then. I've not looked at the detail of the bug, but the metadata for #706044 indicates that it affects the package in unstable as well. If that's correct then it needs to be fixed in unstable before considering a stable fix. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8c8773bcecfac21fefe8061bc377c...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Re: testing migration status of nvidia-graphics-drivers [non-free]
On 2014-02-17 13:24, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2014-02-03 14:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2014-02-03 12:52, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
I'm a bit confused about the testing migration status of
nvidia-graphics-drivers.
[...]
319.76 does have armhf binaries, 319.82 does not have these, but I
had
them removed from unstable early enough to avoid blockage.
nvidia-settings still has armhf binaries and depends on
nvidia-alternative (which no longer does).
How could I find this information myself?
I started from https://release.debian.org/britney/update_output.txt :
trying: nvidia-graphics-drivers
skipped: nvidia-graphics-drivers (63 - 878)
got: 3+0: i-1:a-1:a-0:a-1
* armhf: nvidia-settings
and then looked at the dependencies. Some test runs with
{edos,dos}-debcheck are also often useful here.
Anyway, nvidia-settings has been updated in sid to not build armhf for
now and the outdated armhf binaries were just removed, so this will fix
automatically in a few days (unless someone ages nvidia-settings which
is at 6/10).
#738656 was processed earlier today, so the packages are no longer in
sid. I've aged nvidia-settings for tonight's britney run.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/b86a401cbb47b6b6be4c6242b24d3...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Processed: bug 737906 is forwarded to https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libc2.18.html
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forwarded 737906 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libc2.18.html Bug #737906 [release.debian.org] transition: eglibc Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libc2.18.html'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 737906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737906 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13926467984522.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
fixed 706044 1.8.9-1~exp1 thanks Adam D. Barratt wrote, On 17/02/2014 14:53: On 2014-02-17 13:27, Gilles Filippini wrote: Steffen Grunewald wrote, On 17/02/2014 14:03: Hi Gilles, nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable . -m Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261) Are there plans to make libhdf5-serial-dev work again, aka #706044? I hadn't. But this is indeed a good opportunity to fix it as well. So the plan would be to upload to stable a fix for #706044 which would close #739266 by the way. Am I reading you correctly? If that could be done, we'd get rid of a quite nasty issue, indeed. (I still have no idea how #706044 could slip through during Wheezy freeze.) Thanks, Thank you - there are quite some people around who would be very happy! Let's go this way then. I've not looked at the detail of the bug, but the metadata for #706044 indicates that it affects the package in unstable as well. If that's correct then it needs to be fixed in unstable before considering a stable fix. #706044 was fixed in 1.8.9-1~exp1 but not marked as such. Thanks for the notice, _g. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#739266: wheezy-pu: package hdf5/1.8.8-9+deb7u1 (was: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9)
retitle 739266 wheezy-pu: package hdf5/1.8.8-9+deb7u1 tag 739266 wheezy user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 739266 - binnmu usertag 739266 + pu thanks Gilles Filippini wrote, On 17/02/2014 14:27: Steffen Grunewald wrote, On 17/02/2014 14:03: Hi Gilles, nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable . -m Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261) Are there plans to make libhdf5-serial-dev work again, aka #706044? I hadn't. But this is indeed a good opportunity to fix it as well. So the plan would be to upload to stable a fix for #706044 which would close #739266 by the way. Am I reading you correctly? If that could be done, we'd get rid of a quite nasty issue, indeed. (I still have no idea how #706044 could slip through during Wheezy freeze.) Thanks, Thank you - there are quite some people around who would be very happy! Let's go this way then. It is currently building on my box. Then would retitling this bug as pu: ... be sufficient? The new package is ready. I've successfully tested the build of a hdf5 c++ example in a clean wheezy chroot. Debdiff attached. Thanks, _g. diff -Nru hdf5-1.8.8/debian/changelog hdf5-1.8.8/debian/changelog --- hdf5-1.8.8/debian/changelog 2012-03-08 11:09:55.0 +0100 +++ hdf5-1.8.8/debian/changelog 2014-02-17 15:43:30.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +hdf5 (1.8.8-9+deb7u1) stable; urgency=medium + + * Backport change from the 1.8.9-1 source package: ++ Bring back the C++ library (closes: 706044). + * Upload to stable (closes: #739266). + + -- Gilles Filippini p...@debian.org Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:43:17 +0100 + hdf5 (1.8.8-9) unstable; urgency=low * Force the dependency on the serpack for hdf5-tools hdf5-helpers. diff -Nru hdf5-1.8.8/debian/hdf5-helpers.install hdf5-1.8.8/debian/hdf5-helpers.install --- hdf5-1.8.8/debian/hdf5-helpers.install 2012-02-24 11:15:58.0 +0100 +++ hdf5-1.8.8/debian/hdf5-helpers.install 2014-02-17 15:35:54.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ usr/bin/h5cc usr/bin/h5fc - +usr/bin/h5c++ diff -Nru hdf5-1.8.8/debian/rules hdf5-1.8.8/debian/rules --- hdf5-1.8.8/debian/rules 2012-03-08 11:09:08.0 +0100 +++ hdf5-1.8.8/debian/rules 2014-02-17 15:35:54.0 +0100 @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ --with-pthread --enable-linux-lfs --enable-unsupported \ --enable-shared --enable-production=$(USE_PROD) \ --disable-sharedlib-rpath --with-zlib --with-default-api-version=v18 -SERIAL_ONLY_FLAGS = --enable-fortran --enable-threadsafe +SERIAL_ONLY_FLAGS = --enable-fortran --enable-threadsafe --enable-cxx configure: configure-stamp-debian configure-stamp \ $(configure_stamp_openmpi) configure-stamp-mpich2 @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ dh_makeshlibs -p$(openmpipack) -V $(openmpipack) endif dh_makeshlibs -p$(mpich2pack) -V $(mpich2pack) - dh_makeshlibs -p$(serpack) -V $(serpack) | $(virtpack) + dh_makeshlibs -p$(serpack) -Xhdf5_cpp -Xhdf5_hl_cpp -V $(serpack) | $(virtpack) dh_installdeb $(ARCH_FLAG) dh_shlibdeps -p$(serpack) -L$(serpack) -ldebian/$(serpack)/usr/lib:debian/build/test/.libs dh_shlibdeps -phdf5-tools -L$(serpack) -ldebian/$(serpack)/usr/lib:debian/build/test/.libs signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#739266: wheezy-pu: package hdf5/1.8.8-9+deb7u1 (was: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 739266 wheezy-pu: package hdf5/1.8.8-9+deb7u1 Bug #739266 [release.debian.org] nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9 Changed Bug title to 'wheezy-pu: package hdf5/1.8.8-9+deb7u1' from 'nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9' tag 739266 wheezy Bug #739266 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package hdf5/1.8.8-9+deb7u1 Added tag(s) wheezy. user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was p...@debian.org). usertag 739266 - binnmu Usertags were: binnmu. Usertags are now: . usertag 739266 + pu There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: pu. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 739266: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739266 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.139265645011892.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:15:48 +0100, Steffen Grunewald wrote: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:46:39AM +0100, Gilles Filippini wrote: Gilles Filippini wrote, On 17/02/2014 11:34: Please bear with me as this is my very first binNMU request. I need to have the hdf5 source package rebuilt in wheezy in order to fix #739261. This is because the current hdf5 release in wheezy was built with a gfortran older than the one currently in wheezy. nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable -m Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261) Ah sorry, I've seen a syntax mistake just after pushing send (missing '.'). The nmu line should read: nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable . -m Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy (closes: #739261) Are there plans to make libhdf5-serial-dev work again, aka #706044? #706044 is very much not make libhdf5-serial-dev work again. And is IMO not material for stable, though OMMV. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
Hi Julien, Julien Cristau wrote, On 17/02/2014 18:07: On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:15:48 +0100, Steffen Grunewald wrote: Are there plans to make libhdf5-serial-dev work again, aka #706044? #706044 is very much not make libhdf5-serial-dev work again. Indeed. AIUI #706044 is about re-enabling the HDF5 C++ API. And is IMO not material for stable, though OMMV. Hmm... YMMV for sure. My take is that we re-introduce something that shouldn't have been removed in the first place. This C++ API is in squeeze and will be in jessie. It makes sense to enable it in wheezy as well. And I fail to see potential nasty side effects. Thanks, _g. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#737906: transition: eglibc
Processing control commands: tags -1 + confirmed Bug #737906 [release.debian.org] transition: eglibc Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 737906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737906 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b737906.139266125417257.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#737906: transition: eglibc
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On 2014-02-06 21:20, Adam Conrad wrote: Requestion a transition slot to upload eglibc 2.18 to unstable. The number of rdeps with an exact glibc dependency (due to using internal symbols) is quite low, and should all be binNMUable. Assuming that all we're expecting to be involved is the binNMUs, please go ahead (i.e. there aren't a bunch of FTBFS against eglibc 2.18 bugs hiding up your sleeve somewhere :-). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/a375e9e3ca168515869d49d59260f...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Processed: #739261 blocked by #739266
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 739261 by 739266 Bug #739261 [libhdf5-openmpi-dev] libhdf5-openmpi-dev: Version in stable (wheezy) does not work with gfortran from stable 739261 was not blocked by any bugs. 739261 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 739261: 739266 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 739261: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739261 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13926636703554.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: parcimonie_0.7.1-1+deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.10.9-1~deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.10.9-1~deb7u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.10.9-1~deb7u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.10.9-1~deb7u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.10.9-1~deb7u1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.10.9-1~deb7u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.10.9-1~deb7u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.10.9-1~deb7u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.10.9-1~deb7u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.10.9-1~deb7u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.10.9-1~deb7u1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.10.9-1~deb7u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: pidgin_2.10.9-1~deb7u1_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1wfwgb-00031i...@franck.debian.org
Bug#739375: pu: package elib/1.0-11.1+deb7u1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Since elib was removed from unstable today, we need to fix the
install-info usage in its maintainer scripts in wheezy, otherwise the
package will be un-uninstallable after an upgrade to jessie.
Rebuilding with the debhelper version in wheezy is sufficient. This also
moves around the html documentation to its proper location.
Andreas
diff -u elib-1.0/debian/changelog elib-1.0/debian/changelog
--- elib-1.0/debian/changelog
+++ elib-1.0/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+elib (1.0-11.1+deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=medium
+
+ * QA upload.
+ * Rebuild with current debhelper. (Closes: #689773, #476252)
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org Mon, 17 Feb 2014 23:40:09 +0100
+
elib (1.0-11.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different names, permissions or owners.]
Files in second .deb but not in first
-
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib_0.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib_1.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib_2.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib_3.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib_4.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib_5.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib_6.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib_7.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib_abt.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib_toc.html
Files in first .deb but not in second
-
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib/elib.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib/elib_1.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib/elib_2.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib/elib_3.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib/elib_4.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib/elib_5.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib/elib_6.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib/elib_7.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib/elib_8.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib/elib_abt.html
-rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib/elib_toc.html
drwxr-xr-x root/root /usr/share/doc/elib/html-info/elib/
Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
Installed-Size: [-492-] {+320+}
Version: [-1.0-11.1-] {+1.0-11.1+deb7u1+}
Bug#725142: pu: package totem-plugin-arte/3.2.1-1~wheezy1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Is there anything I can do to help the validation of the fixed package? As a reminder, the totem-plugin-arte package is broken in Stable since mid-August... Thanks, Nicolas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTAphNAAoJEF5mTbNeG1+eOqMQAJIWdAKthLH2fp4dTYDDXvOg hYi4hLbjYk3IzMIyjTy5HsBu5XX9XYmOwe8FnHlIvjWdWFNr2kIszxKn7CuEwwE+ AVn3D/ybEAHLbswPg0eESq2cAaeGpgzjcRejHJYkA8jPfbgSDh8M1XAaNIglhqAT LKlDPDo21wDYUWc2UdqfQOnRNKeamy+HhW0jPAjQVz+F2hdyWtvUVPkbBQkJImY/ +qEaeCf1XAFrpe7y+WRLw3BkxZxsR/QXKtRKOeWnQ98iKNZjV+nwfngYYk3USL/M ry1ek1tEEvQIRYONgVqi61j1xH87P82uKOsDkXf7g5NhrCOf6ctN3JtTFl3DE0AK 2tA1E+jeVYock4RadNomXskzflkXepx1NR9hm5PXA2q88UOZDBWTx+Wm+D32ztNY 0INXquKLcmMla47aggG42JQkHkh6+tP2Wvs1X/BFkwKwUfiIoSmqCsR9Cm6FvTbP NnS611uUAI70iv9JK+0m1QW88pgYz3hX5Ioh7IMBLEKa+oIA+tLAonBiQ4yxl1uI d9G58iPp2Qcu1BHGe+2KZc8Rz0m/tYwpU36kWNjWcRSW1QklJFuMvHKI3S2sLvGa LReOQR/PQvjOZarq3O6zT1kM5L708MN2VF4JQaG4rDp088/ziooMr/R7E1XdL420 XkPgRNfJyq36vIeB/x3e =zeyR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/53029856.40...@nicolas-delvaux.org
