Bug#731491: transition: oce
On 2014-02-18 20:03 GMT+01:00 Julien Cristau wrote: On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:54:45 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: [...] oce 0.15-1 is now in experimental, and soname has been bumped, thus is_good becomes is_good = .depends ~ /liboce-foundation8/; This version fixes long standing issues with OpenCASCADE licensing, as the new version is now LGPL 2.1 (with a runtime exception). yay. Current unstable versions of its rdepends (gmsh, freecad, netgen) do not need source changes, and oce binaries have been built on all architectures. Feel free to upload to sid. I'll update the tracker in a bit. Uploaded, thanks. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAMqf4EEuMyV9D2v7FfmRczKA+h1GmxbbVJp2fwBG=x0wazh...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bits from the Release Team: Architecture health check
On 29/01/2014 23:03, Niels Thykier wrote: I believe this is a first for us (as well) - at the very least, I won't claim to have all the answers. Anyhow, as I see it, we want you to choose a set of supported packages, then we will probably ask how / why you made that choice and, quite possibly, poke a bit at making you choosing a slightly larger set etc. Hi Niels, After some discussion we've reached the following position statement, which has the approval of Steven, Petr and myself: ~~~ It is with much regret that we observe that GDM has grown hard dependencies on a Linux-specific component (systemd). Although GDM still offers the possibility of running it using ConsoleKit, this codepath is no longer supported by upstream, and ConsoleKit itself is considered deprecated software and has been abandoned by its developers. Furthermore, we observe that the GNOME UI has grown hard dependencies on GDM, as well as other developments which make it impractical to run GNOME on kernels other than Linux. Our understanding is that GNOME release managers don't see this as a problem and are not actively trying to resolve this. In this situation we do not think it's reasonably practical for us to continue providing assistance to ensure portability of the GNOME desktop on GNU/kFreeBSD. When it comes to individual applications, we'd like to support as many of them as possible. As long as they are still intended to be portable by their upstream developers, and that they don't have any hard dependency on the GNOME desktop itself (i.e., they can be run as standalone apps), we intend to continue providing porting assistance for them. ~~~ -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5304dcb3.5000...@debian.org
Re: Bits from the Release Team: Architecture health check
Robert Millan r...@debian.org (2014-02-19): After some discussion we've reached the following position statement, which has the approval of Steven, Petr and myself: ~~~ It is with much regret that we observe that GDM has grown hard dependencies on a Linux-specific component (systemd). Although GDM still offers the possibility of running it using ConsoleKit, this codepath is no longer supported by upstream, and ConsoleKit itself is considered deprecated software and has been abandoned by its developers. Furthermore, we observe that the GNOME UI has grown hard dependencies on GDM, as well as other developments which make it impractical to run GNOME on kernels other than Linux. Our understanding is that GNOME release managers don't see this as a problem and are not actively trying to resolve this. In this situation we do not think it's reasonably practical for us to continue providing assistance to ensure portability of the GNOME desktop on GNU/kFreeBSD. When it comes to individual applications, we'd like to support as many of them as possible. As long as they are still intended to be portable by their upstream developers, and that they don't have any hard dependency on the GNOME desktop itself (i.e., they can be run as standalone apps), we intend to continue providing porting assistance for them. ~~~ I thought this might be of some interest: http://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2014/02/19/on-portability/ Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#739525: transition: qscintilla2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition The latest version of qscintialla2 has a new so name, so transition time. I have looked into this locally and believe, now that ovito is fixed (#730890), the rdepends are all ready. This did't go through New yet, but having tested locally, I'm hoping to avoid the need to go via experimental first. Affected packages: * juffed * kscope * monkeystudio * ovito * qtruby * smokeqt * tora * universalindentgui wb nmu juffed kscope monkeystudio ovito qtruby smokeqt tora universalindentgui . ALL . -m Rebuild for libqscintilla2-11 transition. Ben file: title = qscintilla2; is_affected = .depends ~ .build-depends ~ libqscintilla2-dev; is_good = .depends ~ libqscintilla2-11; is_bad = .depends ~ libqscintilla2-9; -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140219171024.4216.28621.reportbug@Scott-Latitude-E6320
Bug#739526: pu: package polarssl/1.2.9-1~deb7u2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, I'm attaching my proposal for polarssl 1.2.9-1~deb7u2 for stable, as discussed with Moritz at #738854. Thanks in advance, Roland -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash diff -ruN polarssl-1.2.9.orig/debian/changelog polarssl-1.2.9/debian/changelog --- polarssl-1.2.9.orig/debian/changelog 2013-10-16 20:15:19.0 +0200 +++ polarssl-1.2.9/debian/changelog 2014-02-16 12:16:50.872530746 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +polarssl (1.2.9-1~deb7u2) stable; urgency=medium + + * Fix FTBFS bug due to expired certificates, backport from upstream 1.3.4, +thanks to Moritz Mühlenhoff (Closes: #738854) + + -- Roland Stigge sti...@antcom.de Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:14:50 +0100 + polarssl (1.2.9-1~deb7u1) stable-security; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -ruN polarssl-1.2.9.orig/debian/patches/04-update-certs-in-testsuite.patch polarssl-1.2.9/debian/patches/04-update-certs-in-testsuite.patch --- polarssl-1.2.9.orig/debian/patches/04-update-certs-in-testsuite.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ polarssl-1.2.9/debian/patches/04-update-certs-in-testsuite.patch 2014-02-16 12:14:44.934546316 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ +The test suite certificate is expired. This was fixed in 1.3.4, so +update the affected certs. + +--- polarssl-1.2.9.orig/tests/data_files/server1.crt polarssl-1.2.9/tests/data_files/server1.crt +@@ -1,60 +1,3 @@ +-Certificate: +-Data: +-Version: 3 (0x2) +-Serial Number: 1 (0x1) +-Signature Algorithm: sha1WithRSAEncryption +-Issuer: C=NL, O=PolarSSL, CN=PolarSSL Test CA +-Validity +-Not Before: Feb 12 14:44:06 2011 GMT +-Not After : Feb 12 14:44:06 2021 GMT +-Subject: C=NL, O=PolarSSL, CN=PolarSSL Server 1 +-Subject Public Key Info: +-Public Key Algorithm: rsaEncryption +-RSA Public Key: (2048 bit) +-Modulus (2048 bit): +-00:a9:02:1f:3d:40:6a:d5:55:53:8b:fd:36:ee:82: +-65:2e:15:61:5e:89:bf:b8:e8:45:90:db:ee:88:16: +-52:d3:f1:43:50:47:96:12:59:64:87:6b:fd:2b:e0: +-46:f9:73:be:dd:cf:92:e1:91:5b:ed:66:a0:6f:89: +-29:79:45:80:d0:83:6a:d5:41:43:77:5f:39:7c:09: +-04:47:82:b0:57:39:70:ed:a3:ec:15:19:1e:a8:33: +-08:47:c1:05:42:a9:fd:4c:c3:b4:df:dd:06:1f:4d: +-10:51:40:67:73:13:0f:40:f8:6d:81:25:5f:0a:b1: +-53:c6:30:7e:15:39:ac:f9:5a:ee:7f:92:9e:a6:05: +-5b:e7:13:97:85:b5:23:92:d9:d4:24:06:d5:09:25: +-89:75:07:dd:a6:1a:8f:3f:09:19:be:ad:65:2c:64: +-eb:95:9b:dc:fe:41:5e:17:a6:da:6c:5b:69:cc:02: +-ba:14:2c:16:24:9c:4a:dc:cd:d0:f7:52:67:73:f1: +-2d:a0:23:fd:7e:f4:31:ca:2d:70:ca:89:0b:04:db: +-2e:a6:4f:70:6e:9e:ce:bd:58:89:e2:53:59:9e:6e: +-5a:92:65:e2:88:3f:0c:94:19:a3:dd:e5:e8:9d:95: +-13:ed:29:db:ab:70:12:dc:5a:ca:6b:17:ab:52:82: +-54:b1 +-Exponent: 65537 (0x10001) +-X509v3 extensions: +-X509v3 Basic Constraints: +-CA:FALSE +-X509v3 Subject Key Identifier: +-1F:74:D6:3F:29:C1:74:74:45:3B:05:12:2C:3D:A8:BD:43:59:02:A6 +-X509v3 Authority Key Identifier: +-keyid:B4:5A:E4:A5:B3:DE:D2:52:F6:B9:D5:A6:95:0F:EB:3E:BC:C7:FD:FF +- +-Signature Algorithm: sha1WithRSAEncryption +-bd:cf:96:c1:95:1e:9a:c2:6e:d8:88:88:d8:2a:7a:96:20:3e: +-50:0b:c8:c7:df:1d:41:ed:e4:66:cd:b3:02:81:7d:57:04:1b: +-5d:c6:33:59:0f:c1:20:b9:23:34:89:8a:6c:f2:fd:c7:48:36: +-8c:80:e7:e1:9b:c6:60:5c:b0:33:02:0e:fd:df:be:61:bc:18: +-89:0c:38:db:fb:fb:46:23:32:f7:8c:c1:3e:7c:de:1e:2f:3a: +-77:2f:f4:8e:93:8e:25:4c:77:21:74:6c:18:b7:72:8d:bf:f5: +-4f:5d:64:95:c1:6a:1a:70:11:88:af:bc:55:8a:25:30:f3:fa: +-69:f2:af:2d:75:fb:2b:89:22:52:9b:05:42:15:29:13:95:5e: +-33:9a:55:d4:c7:22:d8:44:ce:25:ab:b6:70:ee:34:14:9b:c8: +-fc:2f:56:ff:04:7e:18:00:2b:31:ac:36:7f:11:bb:ec:4d:e5: +-69:a6:b4:2c:03:a5:7b:13:3a:03:82:8e:6f:97:f9:70:64:cc: +-e4:88:7a:b4:41:79:15:5a:b7:ff:db:f3:34:86:0c:6b:51:6a: +-cd:a7:01:2d:91:7c:cd:21:d8:2c:48:a6:5c:17:73:8c:1a:0d: +-e2:a0:d4:fd:6c:d1:c9:84:41:46:30:08:e3:d9:b3:1d:7e:ab: +-6a:57:aa:9f + -BEGIN CERTIFICATE- + MIIDPzCCAiegAwIBAgIBATANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADA7MQswCQYDVQQGEwJOTDER + MA8GA1UEChMIUG9sYXJTU0wxGTAXBgNVBAMTEFBvbGFyU1NMIFRlc3QgQ0EwHhcN +---
Re: Bits from the Release Team: Architecture health check
Em 2014-02-19 13:45, Cyril Brulebois escreveu: Robert Millan r...@debian.org (2014-02-19): After some discussion we've reached the following position statement, which has the approval of Steven, Petr and myself: ~~~ It is with much regret that we observe that GDM has grown hard dependencies on a Linux-specific component (systemd). Although GDM still offers the possibility of running it using ConsoleKit, this codepath is no longer supported by upstream, and ConsoleKit itself is considered deprecated software and has been abandoned by its developers. Furthermore, we observe that the GNOME UI has grown hard dependencies on GDM, as well as other developments which make it impractical to run GNOME on kernels other than Linux. Our understanding is that GNOME release managers don't see this as a problem and are not actively trying to resolve this. In this situation we do not think it's reasonably practical for us to continue providing assistance to ensure portability of the GNOME desktop on GNU/kFreeBSD. When it comes to individual applications, we'd like to support as many of them as possible. As long as they are still intended to be portable by their upstream developers, and that they don't have any hard dependency on the GNOME desktop itself (i.e., they can be run as standalone apps), we intend to continue providing porting assistance for them. ~~~ I thought this might be of some interest: http://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2014/02/19/on-portability/ Mraw, KiBi. Interesting...he say: We don’t make it a secret that modern Linux is the primary target that we are developing on and for.. KDE guys also make KDE first in LInux, but they have an official web site to support this purpose http://freebsd.kde.org/ and Gnome? KDE also investing in new technologies and at same time they have a team to portability, so... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/914917e9ce458a98991d41430b9de...@openmailbox.org
Bug#739529: wheezy-pu: package openblas/0.1.1-6+deb7u3
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear Release Team,
Please find attached a proposed update for openblas, fixing bug #739331.
Cheers,
--
.''`.Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Developer
`. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien
`- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594
diff -Nru openblas-0.1.1/debian/changelog openblas-0.1.1/debian/changelog
--- openblas-0.1.1/debian/changelog 2013-06-04 10:10:31.0 +0200
+++ openblas-0.1.1/debian/changelog 2014-02-19 18:43:18.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+openblas (0.1.1-6+deb7u3) wheezy; urgency=low
+
+ * fork-handler.patch: fixes hangs of OpenBLAS when called from a program
+using OpenMP (Closes: #739331)
+
+ -- Sébastien Villemot sebast...@debian.org Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:41:55 +0100
+
openblas (0.1.1-6+deb7u2) stable; urgency=low
* power7.patch: new patch, fixes FTBFS on powerpc machines with Power7 arch
diff -Nru openblas-0.1.1/debian/patches/fork-handler.patch openblas-0.1.1/debian/patches/fork-handler.patch
--- openblas-0.1.1/debian/patches/fork-handler.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ openblas-0.1.1/debian/patches/fork-handler.patch 2014-02-19 18:41:24.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+Description: Add fork handler
+ This patches fixes hangs of OpenBLAS when called from a program using OpenMP.
+ Note that this will only work if OpenBLAS is compiled with pthreads
+ (i.e. no OpenMP).
+Origin: upstream, https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/294#issuecomment-33536895
+Bug: https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/294
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/739331
+Last-Update: 2014-02-17
+---
+This patch header follows DEP-3: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
+--- a/driver/others/memory.c
b/driver/others/memory.c
+@@ -1220,6 +1220,14 @@ static void gotoblas_memory_init(void) {
+ }
+ #endif
+
++static void openblas_fork_handler()
++{
++ int err;
++ err = pthread_atfork (BLASFUNC(blas_thread_shutdown), blas_thread_init, blas_thread_init);
++ if(err != 0)
++fprintf(stderr, OpenBLAS cannot install fork handler. You may meet hang after fork.\n);
++}
++
+ /* Initialization for all function; this function should be called before main */
+
+ static int gotoblas_initialized = 0;
+@@ -1228,6 +1236,8 @@ void CONSTRUCTOR gotoblas_init(void) {
+
+ if (gotoblas_initialized) return;
+
++ openblas_fork_handler();
++
+ #ifdef PROFILE
+moncontrol (0);
+ #endif
diff -Nru openblas-0.1.1/debian/patches/series openblas-0.1.1/debian/patches/series
--- openblas-0.1.1/debian/patches/series 2013-06-04 10:09:31.0 +0200
+++ openblas-0.1.1/debian/patches/series 2014-02-19 18:40:21.0 +0100
@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@
gemv_crash_big_data.diff
dot_uninitialized_buffer.diff
power7.patch
+fork-handler.patch
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Bits from the Release Team: Architecture health check
On 19/02/2014 16:45, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Robert Millan r...@debian.org (2014-02-19): After some discussion we've reached the following position statement, which has the approval of Steven, Petr and myself: ~~~ It is with much regret that we observe that GDM has grown hard dependencies on a Linux-specific component (systemd). Although GDM still offers the possibility of running it using ConsoleKit, this codepath is no longer supported by upstream, and ConsoleKit itself is considered deprecated software and has been abandoned by its developers. Furthermore, we observe that the GNOME UI has grown hard dependencies on GDM, as well as other developments which make it impractical to run GNOME on kernels other than Linux. Our understanding is that GNOME release managers don't see this as a problem and are not actively trying to resolve this. In this situation we do not think it's reasonably practical for us to continue providing assistance to ensure portability of the GNOME desktop on GNU/kFreeBSD. When it comes to individual applications, we'd like to support as many of them as possible. As long as they are still intended to be portable by their upstream developers, and that they don't have any hard dependency on the GNOME desktop itself (i.e., they can be run as standalone apps), we intend to continue providing porting assistance for them. ~~~ I thought this might be of some interest: http://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2014/02/19/on-portability/ Skillful talk and some screenshots may be useful to persuade people, but alas, it has no effect whatsoever on the actual problem. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/53050f95.8030...@debian.org
Bug#739529: wheezy-pu: package openblas/0.1.1-6+deb7u3
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 19:03 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: Please find attached a proposed update for openblas, fixing bug #739331. Please go ahead; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1392842414.14947.8.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#739529: wheezy-pu: package openblas/0.1.1-6+deb7u3
Processing control commands: tags -1 + confirmed Bug #739529 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package openblas/0.1.1-6+deb7u3 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 739529: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739529 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b739529.139284242426058.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#739526: pu: package polarssl/1.2.9-1~deb7u2
Control: tags -1 + wheezy confirmed On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 18:24 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote: I'm attaching my proposal for polarssl 1.2.9-1~deb7u2 for stable, as discussed with Moritz at #738854. I must admit that I'm a little confused by the disconnect between the certificate having expired and: +-Validity +-Not Before: Feb 12 14:44:06 2011 GMT +-Not After : Feb 12 14:44:06 2021 GMT However, it does indeed appear to be the upstream fix for the issue, so please go ahead; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1392843071.14947.11.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#739526: pu: package polarssl/1.2.9-1~deb7u2
Processing control commands: tags -1 + wheezy confirmed Bug #739526 [release.debian.org] pu: package polarssl/1.2.9-1~deb7u2 Added tag(s) wheezy and confirmed. -- 739526: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739526 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b739526.139284308031402.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#735557: transition: octave3.8
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 23:55:19 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: So basically the transition can start as soon as you decide. Go ahead then. Thanks, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 731491
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 731491 + pending Bug #731491 [release.debian.org] transition: oce Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 731491: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731491 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13928434941171.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#735557: transition: octave3.8
Processing control commands: tag -1 confirmed Bug #735557 [release.debian.org] transition: octave3.8 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 735557: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735557 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b735557.13928435811386.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#739529: wheezy-pu: package openblas/0.1.1-6+deb7u3
Le mercredi 19 février 2014 à 20:40 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 19:03 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: Please find attached a proposed update for openblas, fixing bug #739331. Please go ahead; thanks. Uploaded, thanks. -- .''`.Sébastien Villemot : :' :Debian Developer `. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien `- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#735557: transition: octave3.8
Le mercredi 19 février 2014 à 21:59 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit : Control: tag -1 confirmed On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 23:55:19 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: So basically the transition can start as soon as you decide. Go ahead then. Thanks, transition started. -- .''`.Sébastien Villemot : :' :Debian Developer `. `' http://www.dynare.org/sebastien `- GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#739569: nmu: supertux_0.3.4-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu supertux_0.3.4-1 . ALL . experimental . -m Rebuild against glew 1.10 supertux in experimental depends on the no longer available libglew1.7 Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140219234112.1540.33362.report...@cake.ae.cs.uni-frankfurt.de
Fwd: your mail
Продается красивая современная новая вилла на Эгейском побережье Турции с великолепным панорамным видом на море и горы, в небольшом сданном в 2013 году комплексе с охраной,180 кв.м площадью, 3 спальни, кухня-гостиная, полностью меблирована и укомплектована бытовой техникой,участок 400 кв.м с собственным бассейном, документы оформлены.До пляжа 900 метров. Сообщите, пожалуйста, интересует ли Вас такая недвижимость? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/260028927027.kbsdnbrf...@www.310tutors.com
