NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.57-2_armhf.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wb2ol-0004rs...@franck.debian.org
Bug#745110: RM: s3ql/2.7-1
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2014-04-18 05:21, Nikolaus Rath wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Hello, Could you please remove the s3ql package from testing? It's already scheduled for autoremoval, but it'd be nice if we don't have to wait for the deadline to pass. There is a new s3ql release in unstable that fixes the RC bug of the version in testing, but the new release does not support kFreeBSD anymore (due to use of epoll). Therefore, the unstable release is out of date on kfreebsd-* and this blocks migration to testing. If I understand the situation correctly, removing s3ql from testing will allow the new release to migrate. kFreeBSD support will hopefully be restored in the next upstream release. Thanks! -Nikolaus [...] Hi, You need to get the s3ql kfreebsd binaries removed from unstable for it to be able to migrate. Please file a bug against ftp.debian.org for that. We can still remove s3ql from testing, but it will *not* make the version in sid able to migrate. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5350e3be.2070...@thykier.net
Processed: Re: Bug#745110: RM: s3ql/2.7-1
Processing control commands: tags -1 moreinfo Bug #745110 [release.debian.org] RM: s3ql/2.7-1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 745110: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745110 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b745110.13978101234362.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#717493: pu: package sympa/6.1.11~dfsg-5.1~deb7u1
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #717493 [release.debian.org] pu: package sympa/6.1.11~dfsg-5.1~deb7u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 717493: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717493 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b717493.139781593715198.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#717493: pu: package sympa/6.1.11~dfsg-5.1~deb7u1
Control: tags -1 + pending On 2014-04-17 22:46, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 02:24:24PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: I'm slightly torn on this one. Whilst the patch seems obviously correct, it's not applied to the package in unstable, which is usually a requirement for accepting a patch for stable. There's an argument that it's unlikely that anyone will try to update from squeeze's sympa to jessie's without having upgraded perl in between, but conversely the patch should work fine with the package in unstable. Are there any plans to apply the patch, or otherwise update the package, in unstable? This fix apply on a Debian patch[1] which has been merged upstream[2] in sympa 6.1.19 and the fix itself was applied a few commits later[3]. I'm currently working on the packaging of sympa 6.1.20. It should be ready to be uploaded in unstable within the next few days. Thanks. Given how close we are to the upload window for 7.5 closing (over this weekend), I'm prepared to accept the fix as-is on the assumption that it will get to unstable in the very near future, so please go ahead with the upload for stable. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/33fb5f7d0f143308f7094da70d449...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.57-2_mips.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wb5r9-0004v2...@franck.debian.org
Bug#742386: wheezy-pu: package qemu/1.1.2+dfsg-6a+deb7u1
On 2014-04-13 19:05, Michael Tokarev wrote: 13.04.2014 22:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 21:49 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: 13.04.2014 21:39, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Please go ahead. There's a pending security update for qemu fixing CVE-2014-0150 (#744221), which uploads +deb7u1 for both qemu and qemu-kvm, fwiw. Okay, thanks. I guess the stable updates should be +deb7u2 then, incorporating the u1 upload, once it's released. Yes indeed. And I want to take care of this, again, once security fix will be released. I noticed that the security updates have now been released. Not wishing to chase, just a gentle reminder that the window for getting updates in to 7.5 closes over the weekend. (Although getting in to 7.6 instead is presumably not a huge problem.) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/3a4fe9c8a642b15e50b3b355f8da5...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#742386: wheezy-pu: package qemu/1.1.2+dfsg-6a+deb7u1
18.04.2014 15:40, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 2014-04-13 19:05, Michael Tokarev wrote: [] There's a pending security update for qemu fixing CVE-2014-0150 (#744221), which uploads +deb7u1 for both qemu and qemu-kvm, fwiw. Okay, thanks. I guess the stable updates should be +deb7u2 then, incorporating the u1 upload, once it's released. Yes indeed. And I want to take care of this, again, once security fix will be released. I noticed that the security updates have now been released. Not wishing to chase, just a gentle reminder that the window for getting updates in to 7.5 closes over the weekend. (Although getting in to 7.6 instead is presumably not a huge problem.) I've another security bugfix for qemu+qemu-kvm, CVE-2014-2894, assigned today, see https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-04/msg02016.html The fix is also one-liner. Maybe we can combine the two - this #742386 and CVE-2014-2894 - into single pu? If not, I guess I'll go with this #742386 first and CVE-2014-2894 on top of it. Thanks, /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53511284.7070...@msgid.tls.msk.ru
Bug#742386: wheezy-pu: package qemu/1.1.2+dfsg-6a+deb7u1
On 2014-04-18 12:54, Michael Tokarev wrote: 18.04.2014 15:40, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Not wishing to chase, just a gentle reminder that the window for getting updates in to 7.5 closes over the weekend. (Although getting in to 7.6 instead is presumably not a huge problem.) I've another security bugfix for qemu+qemu-kvm, CVE-2014-2894, assigned today, see https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-04/msg02016.html The fix is also one-liner. Maybe we can combine the two - this #742386 and CVE-2014-2894 - into single pu? Looking at the source for the 2.0.0 packages uploaded to unstable yesterday, it looks like they contain the CVE fix? If so then the security-tracker needs updating, as https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-2894 lists unstable as vulnerable. If the security team don't plan to issue a DSA for the issue (which I don't know if they've decided yet) then the patch looks sane enough to include in the p-u. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/c3e4991dd0f08f294bbd5463d9dc5...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#736494: About #736494
On 2014-04-16 16:18, William Dauchy wrote: On Apr16 11:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote: One thing that wasn't absolutely clear from the original (although I guess was potentially implied) is whether any of the fixes which are relevant have previously been applied in some way to the packages in unstable. All the fixes are backports from upstream which are included in package currently in unstable (5.5.x) Thanks for the confirmation. On a related note, it would be appreciated if comments such as cleanup series were more verbose in future, as it appears to have involved removing enabled patches (which ones hopes have been replaced by newer patches) as well as those which were already disabled. I will be more versbose on those; it was commented patches in series, so not used; this modification has also been made in unstable. Thanks. Just a gentle reminder, the window for getting an upload in to the 7.5 point release closes over the weekend. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/62822e09ae49c94255dfddcde334c...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Bug#736494: About #736494
On Fri, April 18, 2014 17:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 2014-04-16 16:18, William Dauchy wrote: On Apr16 11:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On a related note, it would be appreciated if comments such as cleanup series were more verbose in future, as it appears to have involved removing enabled patches (which ones hopes have been replaced by newer patches) as well as those which were already disabled. I will be more versbose on those; it was commented patches in series, so not used; this modification has also been made in unstable. Thanks. Just a gentle reminder, the window for getting an upload in to the 7.5 point release closes over the weekend. Thanks for the reminder. It should have been uploaded less than an hour ago. Cheers, Thijs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/b274b3caf50e6f06e1af1c78e0a3f4d0.squir...@aphrodite.kinkhorst.nl
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.57-2_mipsel.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wbbex-00050k...@franck.debian.org
Bug#745110: RM: s3ql/2.7-1
On 04/18/2014 01:35 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: Could you please remove the s3ql package from testing? It's already scheduled for autoremoval, but it'd be nice if we don't have to wait for the deadline to pass. There is a new s3ql release in unstable that fixes the RC bug of the version in testing, but the new release does not support kFreeBSD anymore (due to use of epoll). Therefore, the unstable release is out of date on kfreebsd-* and this blocks migration to testing. If I understand the situation correctly, removing s3ql from testing will allow the new release to migrate. kFreeBSD support will hopefully be restored in the next upstream release. You need to get the s3ql kfreebsd binaries removed from unstable for it to be able to migrate. Please file a bug against ftp.debian.org for that. We can still remove s3ql from testing, but it will *not* make the version in sid able to migrate. Got it. Thanks for your help! Best, -Nikolaus -- GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.« -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53515aa8.2040...@rath.org
Bug#745110: marked as done (RM: s3ql/2.7-1)
Your message dated Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:26:41 +0200 with message-id 53516051.2000...@thykier.net and subject line Re: Bug#745110: RM: s3ql/2.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #745110, regarding RM: s3ql/2.7-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 745110: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745110 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Hello, Could you please remove the s3ql package from testing? It's already scheduled for autoremoval, but it'd be nice if we don't have to wait for the deadline to pass. There is a new s3ql release in unstable that fixes the RC bug of the version in testing, but the new release does not support kFreeBSD anymore (due to use of epoll). Therefore, the unstable release is out of date on kfreebsd-* and this blocks migration to testing. If I understand the situation correctly, removing s3ql from testing will allow the new release to migrate. kFreeBSD support will hopefully be restored in the next upstream release. Thanks! -Nikolaus -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.13-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 2014-04-18 19:02, Nikolaus Rath wrote: On 04/18/2014 01:35 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: Could you please remove the s3ql package from testing? It's already scheduled for autoremoval, but it'd be nice if we don't have to wait for the deadline to pass. There is a new s3ql release in unstable that fixes the RC bug of the version in testing, but the new release does not support kFreeBSD anymore (due to use of epoll). Therefore, the unstable release is out of date on kfreebsd-* and this blocks migration to testing. If I understand the situation correctly, removing s3ql from testing will allow the new release to migrate. kFreeBSD support will hopefully be restored in the next upstream release. You need to get the s3ql kfreebsd binaries removed from unstable for it to be able to migrate. Please file a bug against ftp.debian.org for that. We can still remove s3ql from testing, but it will *not* make the version in sid able to migrate. Got it. Thanks for your help! Best, -Nikolaus I am guessing that #745178 is intended to replace this bug, so I'll take the liberty of closing this one. ~Niels---End Message---
Bug#736494: About #736494
Control: tags -1 + pending On 2014-04-18 16:53, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Fri, April 18, 2014 17:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Just a gentle reminder, the window for getting an upload in to the 7.5 point release closes over the weekend. Thanks for the reminder. It should have been uploaded less than an hour ago. Indeed; that was during dinstall, so it hadn't popped up on our radar. Flagged for acceptance; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/f1f95bd8f43d3dd3e057139230168...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Processed: Re: Bug#736494: About #736494
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #736494 [release.debian.org] pu: package php5/5.4.45.4.4-14+deb7u8 Added tag(s) pending. -- 736494: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736494 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b736494.139784251428352.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: openssl_1.0.1e-2+deb7u7_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openssl_1.0.1e-2+deb7u7_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openssl_1.0.1e-2+deb7u7_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openssl_1.0.1e-2+deb7u7_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openssl_1.0.1e-2+deb7u7_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openssl_1.0.1e-2+deb7u7_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openssl_1.0.1e-2+deb7u7_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openssl_1.0.1e-2+deb7u7_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openssl_1.0.1e-2+deb7u7_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openssl_1.0.1e-2+deb7u7_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openssl_1.0.1e-2+deb7u7_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openssl_1.0.1e-2+deb7u7_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: openssl_1.0.1e-2+deb7u7_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u9_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: qemu_1.1.2+dfsg-6a+deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: qemu_1.1.2+dfsg-6a+deb7u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: qemu_1.1.2+dfsg-6a+deb7u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: qemu_1.1.2+dfsg-6a+deb7u1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: qemu_1.1.2+dfsg-6a+deb7u1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: qemu_1.1.2+dfsg-6a+deb7u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: qemu_1.1.2+dfsg-6a+deb7u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: qemu_1.1.2+dfsg-6a+deb7u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: qemu_1.1.2+dfsg-6a+deb7u1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: qemu_1.1.2+dfsg-6a+deb7u1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: qemu_1.1.2+dfsg-6a+deb7u1_s390x.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: qemu_1.1.2+dfsg-6a+deb7u1_sparc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: qemu-kvm_1.1.2+dfsg-6+deb7u1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: qemu-kvm_1.1.2+dfsg-6+deb7u1_i386.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wbctf-fc...@franck.debian.org
Re: Bug#745019: problems with 2.6.32 kernel (and wheezy libnl3)
Hi Dietmar, Am Donnerstag, 17. April 2014, 10:15:21 schrieben Sie: Package: libnl3 Version: 3.2.7 The library does not work when running newer versions of the 2.6.32 kernel: # nl-qdisc-list Error: Unable to allocate link cache: Input data out of range (same bug with 3.2.24-1) This is already fixed upstream: http://git.infradead.org/users/tgr/libnl.git/commit/dfd0a80ec845a800504fecb9 36c2b33d6918fc9c Also see: https://bugzilla.openvz.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2939 Would be great to have a fix for wheezy. As I was doing an upload for another problem anyway, I backported the fix from the upstream git into our 3.2.24. 2.6.32 was the kernel from squeeze, while wheezy uses mainly 3.2, so I'm not sure if this fix is critical enough to warrant a stable update. I've therefore added debian-release to get an answer to this question :-) . Heiko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2305885.fzbCAUopYp@phil
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: wordpress_3.6.1+dfsg-1~deb7u3_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wbekc-0005c4...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u9_s390.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wbh5n-0005ms...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u9_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u9_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u9_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u9_powerpc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wbhkq-0007hp...@franck.debian.org
Bug#745209: transition: gloox
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively small transition (just like #736219 was), with only 4 source packages affected, and only 2 of them are in testing: licq (build ok, needs binNMU) 0ad (build ok, needs binNMU) Assuming the release team has no objections, I'll go ahead and upload this to unstable directly. Ben file: title = gloox; is_affected = .depends ~ libgloox11 | .depends ~ libgloox12; is_good = .depends ~ libgloox12; is_bad = .depends ~ libgloox11; Regards, Vincent -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.13-5-vclaptop-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140418224735.21703.2056.reportbug@vincent-tlaptop
Bug#745210: pu: package intel-microcode/1.20140122.1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Please aprove an update for wheezy for the intel-microcode package (non-free). This Intel microcode update has been available on non-free testing, unstable and wheezy-backports already for two months without issues. It updates the microcode of very widely-used processors (Ivy-Bridge, Haswell and Crystal Well Core i*, as well as Xeon E5-v2). As usual, I do not know what specific errata these updates fix, Intel did not disclose any information about it to the general public. An update for wheezy stable is required so that: 1. users that have not installed the backports package (which was updated two months ago) can receive up-to-date microcode. 2. an update for squeeze-backports can be uploaded. Here's the changelog of the update: intel-microcode (1.20140122.1) stable; urgency=low * New upstream microcode data file 20140122 + New Microcodes: sig 0x00040661, pf mask 0x32, 2013-08-21, rev 0x000f, size 23552 + Updated Microcodes: sig 0x000106e5, pf mask 0x13, 2013-08-20, rev 0x0007, size 7168 sig 0x000306c3, pf mask 0x32, 2013-08-16, rev 0x0017, size 20480 sig 0x000306e4, pf mask 0xed, 2013-07-09, rev 0x0416, size 11264 sig 0x00040651, pf mask 0x72, 2013-09-14, rev 0x0017, size 19456 debdiff Diffstat: changelog | 10 debian/changelog | 13 microcode-20130906.dat |36211 --- microcode-20140122.dat |37684 + I've attached the debdiff for the proposed update, with the changes to the .dat file removed to reduce clutter. -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.4 APT prefers proposed-updates APT policy: (990, 'proposed-updates'), (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.10.37+ (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh diff -Nru intel-microcode-1.20130906.1/changelog intel-microcode-1.20140122.1/changelog --- intel-microcode-1.20130906.1/changelog 2013-09-24 21:48:47.0 -0300 +++ intel-microcode-1.20140122.1/changelog 2014-04-18 16:46:10.0 -0300 @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +2014-01-22: + * New Microcodes: +sig 0x00040661, pf mask 0x32, 2013-08-21, rev 0x000f, size 23552 + + * Updated Microcodes: +sig 0x000106e5, pf mask 0x13, 2013-08-20, rev 0x0007, size 7168 +sig 0x000306c3, pf mask 0x32, 2013-08-16, rev 0x0017, size 20480 +sig 0x000306e4, pf mask 0xed, 2013-07-09, rev 0x0416, size 11264 +sig 0x00040651, pf mask 0x72, 2013-09-14, rev 0x0017, size 19456 + 2013-09-06: * Updated Microcodes: sig 0x000306c3, pf mask 0x32, 2013-08-07, rev 0x0016, size 20480 diff -Nru intel-microcode-1.20130906.1/debian/changelog intel-microcode-1.20140122.1/debian/changelog --- intel-microcode-1.20130906.1/debian/changelog 2013-09-26 14:43:51.0 -0300 +++ intel-microcode-1.20140122.1/debian/changelog 2014-04-18 16:46:10.0 -0300 @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@ +intel-microcode (1.20140122.1) stable; urgency=low + + * New upstream microcode data file 20140122 ++ New Microcodes: + sig 0x00040661, pf mask 0x32, 2013-08-21, rev 0x000f, size 23552 ++ Updated Microcodes: + sig 0x000106e5, pf mask 0x13, 2013-08-20, rev 0x0007, size 7168 + sig 0x000306c3, pf mask 0x32, 2013-08-16, rev 0x0017, size 20480 + sig 0x000306e4, pf mask 0xed, 2013-07-09, rev 0x0416, size 11264 + sig 0x00040651, pf mask 0x72, 2013-09-14, rev 0x0017, size 19456 + + -- Henrique de Moraes Holschuh h...@debian.org Sat, 01 Feb 2014 17:00:53 -0200 + intel-microcode (1.20130906.1) stable; urgency=high * New upstream microcode data file 20130906 diff -Nru intel-microcode-1.20130906.1/microcode-20130906.dat intel-microcode-1.20140122.1/microcode-20130906.dat --- intel-microcode-1.20130906.1/microcode-20130906.dat 2013-09-24 21:48:47.0 -0300 +++ intel-microcode-1.20140122.1/microcode-20130906.dat 1969-12-31 21:00:00.0 -0300
Bug#717493: pu: package sympa/6.1.11~dfsg-5.1~deb7u1
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:12:07AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
Given how close we are to the upload window for 7.5 closing (over
this weekend), I'm prepared to accept the fix as-is on the assumption
that it will get to unstable in the very near future, so please go
ahead with the upload for stable.
Done a few minutes ago.
Thanks,
M.
--
Emmanuel Bouthenot
mail: kolter@{openics,debian}.orggpg: 4096R/0x929D42C3
xmpp: kol...@im.openics.org irc: kolter@{freenode,oftc}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140418234336.ga31...@openics.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u9_armel.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wbign-0005sh...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u9_ia64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wbiut-0007mb...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u9_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wbixv-00028q...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: linux_3.2.57-2_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wbjqy-00059s...@franck.debian.org
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: php5_5.4.4-14+deb7u9_mips.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1wbmib-00068i...@franck.debian.org
