Bug#758597: unblock: win32-loader/0.7.5
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock win32-loader is only blocked because the migration needs manual work from the FTP Masters. win32-loader has seen some translation updates and other small code updates but nothing too weird for a pre-freeze period: win32-loader (0.7.5) unstable; urgency=medium The « Schistocerca gregaria » release * Replicate d-i's change for the video mode fr the graphical installer: Remove old video=vesa:ywrap,mtrr option from VIDEO_MODE_GTK DirectFB apparently needed those at some point. Let's see whether letting the kernel do its job just works. (See: #395040) * Fetch hurd dailies from d-i.debian.org * Replace deprcated wiki.d.o errata url with the one from www.d.o * Use http.d.n instead of cdn.d.n -- Didier Raboud o...@debian.org Tue, 12 Aug 2014 22:51:27 +0200 win32-loader (0.7.4.10) unstable; urgency=medium [ Changwoo Ryu ] * Updated translations: - Korean -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Wed, 23 Apr 2014 07:31:52 +0200 win32-loader (0.7.4.9) unstable; urgency=low [ Dmitrijs Ledkovs ] * Bump debhelper compat level to 9. * Set Vcs-* to canonical format. [ Christian Perrier ] * Add myself to Uploaders * Update Standards to 3.9.4 (checked) -- Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Sun, 14 Jul 2013 13:08:00 +0200 As usual: a) -release unblocks: unblock win32-loader/0.7.5 b) Ftpmasters do their magic with the files in tools/win32-loader to reflect the unstable-testing copy Thanks in advance, cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140819055901.19846.68353.reportbug@gyllingar
Bug#758602: nmu: proftpd-mod-fsync_0.2-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu proftpd-mod-fsync_0.2-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against proftpd-dfsg 1.3.5-1 Package still depends on proftpd-abi-1.3.5rc4 -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.utf8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140819075318.27006.38972.report...@seneca.home.org
Bug#758603: nmu: proftpd-mod-msg_0.4.1-1.1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu proftpd-mod-msg_0.4.1-1.1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against proftpd-dfsg 1.3.5-1 Package still depends on proftpd-abi-1.3.5rc4 -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.utf8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140819075447.27108.93793.report...@seneca.home.org
Bug#758604: nmu: proftpd-mod-tar_0.3.3-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu proftpd-mod-tar_0.3.3-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against proftpd-dfsg 1.3.5-1 Package still depends on proftpd-abi-1.3.5rc4 -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.utf8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140819075616.27226.8357.report...@seneca.home.org
Bug#758605: nmu: proftpd-mod-vroot_0.9.2-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu proftpd-mod-vroot_0.9.2-2 . ALL . -m Rebuild against proftpd-dfsg 1.3.5-1 Package still depends on proftpd-abi-1.3.5rc4 -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.utf8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140819075906.27386.45975.report...@seneca.home.org
Bug#758603: marked as done (nmu: proftpd-mod-msg_0.4.1-1.1)
Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:04:43 +0200 with message-id 53f3051b.4020...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#758603: nmu: proftpd-mod-msg_0.4.1-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #758603, regarding nmu: proftpd-mod-msg_0.4.1-1.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 758603: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758603 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu proftpd-mod-msg_0.4.1-1.1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against proftpd-dfsg 1.3.5-1 Package still depends on proftpd-abi-1.3.5rc4 -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.utf8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 19/08/14 09:54, Ralf Treinen wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu proftpd-mod-msg_0.4.1-1.1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against proftpd-dfsg 1.3.5-1 Package still depends on proftpd-abi-1.3.5rc4 Done. Emilio---End Message---
Bug#758604: marked as done (nmu: proftpd-mod-tar_0.3.3-1)
Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:04:25 +0200 with message-id 53f30509.2020...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#758604: nmu: proftpd-mod-tar_0.3.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #758604, regarding nmu: proftpd-mod-tar_0.3.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 758604: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758604 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu proftpd-mod-tar_0.3.3-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against proftpd-dfsg 1.3.5-1 Package still depends on proftpd-abi-1.3.5rc4 -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.utf8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 19/08/14 09:56, Ralf Treinen wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu proftpd-mod-tar_0.3.3-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against proftpd-dfsg 1.3.5-1 Done. Emilio---End Message---
Bug#758602: marked as done (nmu: proftpd-mod-fsync_0.2-1)
Your message dated Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:06:10 +0200 with message-id 53f30572.8000...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#758602: nmu: proftpd-mod-fsync_0.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #758602, regarding nmu: proftpd-mod-fsync_0.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 758602: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758602 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu proftpd-mod-fsync_0.2-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against proftpd-dfsg 1.3.5-1 Package still depends on proftpd-abi-1.3.5rc4 -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.utf8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On 19/08/14 09:53, Ralf Treinen wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu proftpd-mod-fsync_0.2-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against proftpd-dfsg 1.3.5-1 Package still depends on proftpd-abi-1.3.5rc4 Done. Emilio PS: it'd be fine if you filed all of these related binnmu requests on the same bug---End Message---
Bug#758616: dpkg: support installing M-A:same packages with different binNMU version
Package: dpkg Version: 1.17.11 Severity: wishlist (X-d-cc debian-release@) Hi, Currently M-A:same packages with different versions can't be co-installed. That prevents packages that have been binNMUed in one architecture but not another to be co-installed, e.g. libfoo_1.1-1:i386 libfoo_1.1-1+b1:amd64 or libfoo_1.1-1+b1:i386 libfoo_1.1-1+b2:amd64 Can't be co-installed. This is problematic because packages get binNMU on a subset of architectures very often (whenever it's not needed to binNMU them everywhere). See e.g. #758527. Emilio -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (800, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental'), (650, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages dpkg depends on: ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.6-7 ii libc62.19-7 ii liblzma5 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2 ii libselinux1 2.3-1 ii tar 1.27.1-2 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-1 dpkg recommends no packages. Versions of packages dpkg suggests: ii apt 1.0.6 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140819092519.25647.46164.reportbug@titan
FYI: torbrowser-launcher might require updates during point releases
Dear SRMs, On Mittwoch, 25. Juni 2014, intrigeri wrote: Micah Lee wrote (25 Jun 2014 18:35:45 GMT) : * TLS/x.509 security: torbrowser-launcher doesn't rely on the CA infrastructure. The only TLS it does is make HTTPS requests to check.torproject.org and (if you haven't set a mirror) www.torproject.org. When it connects to these hostnames, it uses a hardcoded certificate. So none of the TLS PKI issues apply at all here. I like the idea of using the Debian archive as a side-channel, presumably already somewhat trusted, to distribute the included certificate. @Debian maintainers: it might be nice to make the stable release team aware that this package will most likely need to be updated in stable point-releases, when the certificate changes. I'm not sure how likely this is, but as intrigeri suggested it's probably a good idea to notify you now that this might happen. I assume this is not a reason to not include torbrowser-launcher in a stable release, but it's up to you to decide. :-) cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Bug#752275: FYI: torbrowser-launcher might require updates during point releases
Hi, Holger Levsen wrote (19 Aug 2014 18:41:30 GMT) : I'm not sure how likely this is, [...] Data point: the certificate that's currently in use, and hard-coded, is valid for ~2.5 years. It expires in May, 2016. So, it seems that we'll need at least one stable update during the lifetime of Jessie. Cheers, -- intrigeri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/85egwcxpyu@boum.org
Bug#758667: nmu: irssi_0.8.17~rc1-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu irssi_0.8.17~rc1-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against perlapi-5.20.0. Hi, It wasn't rebuild with newest perl in sid. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53f392b6.70...@linuxmint.pl
Re: Bug#758492: RM: lcms/1.19.dfsg2-1.5
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net schrieb: This in fact requires a bit more time, see below: Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Depends: devil: libdevil1c2 I've reopened the bug, a resolution is pending. foo2zjs: printer-driver-foo2zjs This is #757384 gimp: gimp I've reopened the bug and bumped to RC severity. imagemagick: libmagickcore-dev This will be fixed along with the imagemagick transition. Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/slrnlv7e69.30o@inutil.org
Re: kfreebsd-* release status?
On 19/08/14 00:40, Cyril Brulebois wrote: [ I'm adding -release@ to the loop. I tried to refrain from mentioning my concerns in the Jessie Beta 1 announce, that's why I used a quite neutral wording, but let's be honest: kfreebsd-* is looking bad right now. ] I was drafting a quite long reply to this, but after 15 minutes, I realised whatever precious time we have, needs to be spent fixing the bugs, not discussing this. So I'll reply to each of the bugs individually. In short, yes I think kfreebsd does have high workload right now; we could use more help as the freeze approaches, but I'm not worried. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: block 758492 with 757384 743596 740495
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 758492 with 757384 743596 740495 Bug #758492 [release.debian.org] RM: lcms/1.19.dfsg2-1.5 758492 was not blocked by any bugs. 758492 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 758492: 743596, 740495, and 757384 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 758492: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758492 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.140851322518935.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
