Re: More trigger cycles
Hi Niels, On Sonntag, 22. Februar 2015, Niels Thykier wrote: I admit I would (also?) have preferred that we did not depend on a missing error check in dpkg. If the automatic check on jenkins.d.n is extended early in the stretch cycle, I suspect we have a pretty good chance at getting most of them done. is there anything you'd like to see done except s#jessie#stretch#g then? Adding more jobs is rather trivial... (and hw ressources are available.) My major concern right now is that we are still blind to the actual number of remaining issues. We only learn of them by getting occasional upgrade is broken reports - this way, we are never really sure when we have fixed the last one. If there are any jobs you could imagine to help finding these issues on jenkins.d.n before users report them, I'd be curious to hear (and quite very probably happy to implement them)! Andreas has also added a new suite to his (private) piuparts configuration, wheezy2jessie-apt1st/main, which upgrades apt first and then lets the new apt compute the upgrade path for the remaining packages, do you think that would be interesting to run piuparts.d.o? cheers, Holger, still+again happy to see jenkins.d.n being so useful! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#776748: (pre-approval) unblock: libxml2/2.9.1+dfsg1-5 (via t-p-u)
On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 11:38:05 +0100 Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org wrote: Hi, On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:55:27AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: Go ahead, thanks. Uploaded. Unblocked. On PTS it says: * Unblock request by ivodd ignored due to version mismatch: 2.9.1+dfsg1-5 Anything wrong? Cheers, Aron -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAMr=8w5f3amure66o2zdq+ag4bmoc3hikus6g79ds0wtg-+...@mail.gmail.com
Processed: jessie-pu requires release-team approval
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 778851 by 778858 Bug #778851 [src:openafs] corrupted mmaped files in AFS 778851 was not blocked by any bugs. 778851 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 778851: 778858 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 778851: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778851 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14247079089332.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2
Processing control commands: tags -1 wontfix Bug #774737 [release.debian.org] unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2 Added tag(s) wontfix. -- 774737: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774737 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b774737.142471014724213.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#772183: unblock: libjpeg6b/1:6b2-2
Control: tags -1 wontfix On 2014-12-05 23:47, Bill Allombert wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Dera release team, Please unblock package libjpeg6b (and unstuck it from NEW). libjpeg6b binaries were hijacked by the libjpeg-turbo source package, but this have been resolved. So I made a new libjpeg6b upload so that the libjpeg6b binaries get rebuilt. However this caused libjpeg6b to be directed to the NEW queue, which is still there. So it missed the freeze deadline Given that libjpeg6b is in wheezy, and the package was fully expected to be released in jessie before it was hijacked, I would appreciate if you would unstuck it. unblock libjpeg6b/1:6b2-2 Thanks for your understanding, As debated in #774737, we will only be shipping with one implementation of libjpeg, so I am afraid I will have to decline this request. Yours truly, ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54eb5a2d.5010...@thykier.net
Processed: Re: Bug#772183: unblock: libjpeg6b/1:6b2-2
Processing control commands: tags -1 wontfix Bug #772183 [release.debian.org] unblock: libjpeg6b/1:6b2-2 Added tag(s) wontfix. -- 772183: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772183 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b772183.142471020124497.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2
Control: tags -1 wontfix On 2015-01-06 23:25, Bill Allombert wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please allow libjpeg9 back in jessie. The removal of libjpeg9 implies the removal of libjpeg-progs which is in wheezy and used by a number of users, thus it is not unused. It would be disruptive for wheezy to miss it. Concerning bug #773232, it is spurious. This is a bug in a different pakage which was fixed a long time ago. I dealt with it immediatly but somehow I forgot to close it/reassign it, and I offer my apology for that. At this point I was in holiday and forgot about it and I did not receive a reminder until today. This is done now. unblock libjpeg9/1:9a-2 Thanks for your understanding, As debated in this bug, I am afraid we will have to decline this request. Regarding the migration path, it seems that the jpeg-progs do not currently have a valid migration path. I will bring this to the jpeg-turbo maintainer(s) and request them to come up with a solution. Yours truly, ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54eb59f7.60...@thykier.net
Bug#776748: (pre-approval) unblock: libxml2/2.9.1+dfsg1-5 (via t-p-u)
On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 20:02 +0800, Aron Xu wrote: On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 11:38:05 +0100 Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org wrote: Hi, On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:55:27AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote: Go ahead, thanks. Uploaded. Unblocked. On PTS it says: * Unblock request by ivodd ignored due to version mismatch: 2.9.1+dfsg1-5 Anything wrong? Not on our side. The PTS is only checking the excuses for unstable, which is obviously not unblocked. Compare the output of grep-excuses libxml2 and grep-excuses libxml2_tpu. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1424710139.7430.11.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk
Re: Bug#777597: perl-modules: upgrade regression: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of perl-modules
On 2015-02-15 12:57, Niko Tyni wrote: (Dropping Sven and Andreas but adding the release team; there's a question for you lower in the mail.) On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:19:18PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: [...] Relaxing the circular dependency is a workaround that might be doable, even though it would be 'incorrect'. There are modules in perl that need others in perl-modules, and vice versa. However, I count only 21 binary packages in sid [1] that depend on perl-modules but not perl. As perl is transitively build essential (via dpkg-dev and libdpkg-perl), build dependencies should not be a concern at all. There are a few packages that pull in perl indirectly through their other dependencies, which brings the count of binary packages that only depend on perl-modules down to 15: [...] Release team: if we don't find another solution, would you be willing to allow changes in these packages replacing Depends: perl-modules with Depends: perl into jessie? [...] Yes. Feel free to do this in parallel with trying to find an alternative solution. The sooner we solve this upgrade issue, the better. Thanks, ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54eba335.4080...@thykier.net
Bug#778338: unblock: file/1:5.22+15-1
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2015-02-13 18:10, Christoph Biedl wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Short version: Please unblock file 1:5.22+15-1 It entered unstable a few weeks ago, I did extensive testing before uploading and no issues have been reported. However, switching to a new upstream version still requires a longer explanation. [...] My decision to forward to a new upstream version (plus some more commits) instead was also driven by the experience of backporting fixes for wheezy and squeeze-lts which became quite complex, always carrying the risk of introducing new bugs. For jessie, I'd like to start at a late point so fixing future security bugs will be easier. Hi, While I do understand your PoV, I cannot say I am very pleased with pulling a new upstream release of file(1). We got plenty of tools that are expecting certain output from file that /may/ suddenly need to be changed. Not to mention, in the previous release, an upload of file (for unstable) broke dpkg's dpkg-shlibs. I know it was not you, who uploaded that and I suspect this version of file is unlikely to be that bad given it has been in unstable for 1½ months. Note, I have not attached the debdiff as it's rather huge, some 69k lines. I will hand it in later upon request. Kind regards, Christoph [..] I suspect a filterdiff would do wonders to that output. If you truly consider getting this into Jessie, then please consider supplying a version with the auto-generated files and the FILE_RCSID(...) changes filtered out. That said, I will make no promises to accept it even with a filtered diff. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54eba96b.3060...@thykier.net
Processed: Re: Bug#778554: unblock: systemd/215-12
Processing control commands: tags -1 = d-i Bug #778554 [release.debian.org] unblock: systemd/215-12 Added tag(s) d-i. -- 778554: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778554 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b778554.142472752119461.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#778554: unblock: systemd/215-12
Control: tags -1 = d-i On 2015-02-16 17:16, Martin Pitt wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock systemd 215-12 hit unstable three days ago with some RC/important/safe So far there have been no regression reports. At the time of this writing there are now no RC bugs left \o/ I attach the full debdiff between 215-11 and -12, but as usual I also link to the individual commits on anonscm. Unfortunately the latter are a bit noisy, as the implementation of the fixes was discussed several times and changed a bit. Note that there are zero changes for udev and hence the udebs (for d-i). Sorry, this one fell through on my end. It is ok from my PoV, CC'ing KiBi for a d-i ack (out of principle). Quoting you in full for KiBi's convenience. Annotated changelog: | systemd (215-12) unstable; urgency=medium | | [ Martin Pitt ] | * debian/udev.README.Debian: Trim the parts which are obsolete, wrong, or | described in manpages. Only keep the Debian specific bits. | (Part of #776546) http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=a76b454 | * Actually install udev's README.Debian when building for Debian. | (Closes: #776546) http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=d26405c8 Documentation cleanup. Note that this was requested/pre-approved by Niels. | * Only start logind if dbus is installed. This fixes the noisy startup | failure in environments without dbus such as LXC containers or servers. | (part of #772700) http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=a7d7679 http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=0d601f8 (update/cleanup) | * Add getty-static.service unit which starts getty@.service on tty 2 to 6 if | dbus is not installed, and hence logind cannot auto-start them on demand. | (Closes: #772700) http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=c4b5782f0 http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=965ef72 (cleanup of the previous two commits) RC bug (with 3 duplicates). This restores VT functionality on systems without dbus (i. e. mainly servers) as it is under sysvinit, and quiesces logind failures there. | * Add unit-config autopkgtest to check systemd unit/sysv init enabling and | disabling via systemctl. This avoids bugs like #777613 (did not affect | unstable). http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=ec551e56 I used this to verify that 215 was not affected. I'd like to keep this in master, just to have it available for post-release bug fixes/verification. | * cgroup: Don't trim cgroup trees created by someone else, just the ones | that systemd itself created. This avoids cleaning up empty cgroups from | e.g. LXC. (Closes: #777601) http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=255ae60 http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=59d9202 (followup fix due to git pilot error on my side, sorry) RC bug. This looks fairly intrusive (not at all in patch size, that's just a two-liner; but in effect), but as long as there is more than just systemd writing to /sys/fs/cgroups this errs on the safe side: now systemd will never cleanup empty cgroups that it didn't create by itself (realized_mask); before it cleaned up all controllers which are supported by the kernel (cgroup_supported). | * boot-and-services autopkgtest: Add CgroupsTest to check cgroup | creation/cleanup behaviour. This reproduces #777601 and verifies the fix | for it. http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=f1a42bae tests == ♥ :-) | * rules: Fix by-path of mmc RPMB partitions and don't blkid them. Avoids | kernel buffer I/O errors and timeouts. (LP: #1333140) http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=21c55fb This is https://launchpad.net/bugs/1333140 . Not quite RC, but a trivial patch which just blacklists mmcblk*-rpmb devices from getting touched by udev rules; they are rather mimosic and can't really opened or detected with blkid and other tools. | * Document systemctl --failed option. (Closes: #767267) http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=8b3d324 Documentation (manpage) only, and an useful option. | [ Michael Biebl ] | * core: Don't fail to run services in --user instances if $HOME is missing. | (Closes: #759320) http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?id=e0b3ce3b Not release critical, but causes annoyingly long delays during shutdown, and quite a simple fix. | [ Didier Roche ] | * default-display-manager-generator: Avoid unnecessary /dev/null symlink and | warning if there is no display-manager.service
Re: [steve.m....@googlemail.com: Perl 5.20.2 is now available!]
On 2015-02-16 21:45, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: [...] Hi release team, See http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/perl-maintainers/2015-February/004667.html where I have summarised some possibly-relevant fixes from the latest stable release of perl. Many of them are regressions from what we have in wheezy. By themselves none of them are release critical but there is quite a bundle of changes. Do you think there is any point in trying to get these into Jessie before release? I think there'd be an argument for them going in in a point release if not. It'd probably be safest to actually import 5.20.2 rather than cherry pick all the right patches from that long list. I realise that this falls some way outside the current freeze policy, so feel free to tell me to go away :) Note: there's one bug currently filed at RC to consider fixing in perl: #777556. Cheers, Dominic. I do feel it is not quite in the spirit of the freeze-policy. Though having reviewed the concrete upstream changes, commit-by-commit, I would be willing to accept those (upstream) changes for Jessie. That said, my approval assumes there will be no changes on the debian side (beyond dropping patches applied upstream and a changelog entry). If there are other changes to debian/, they will need to be approved separately. Thanks, ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54eba29e.6030...@thykier.net
Processed: Re: Bug#778338: unblock: file/1:5.22+15-1
Processing control commands: tags -1 moreinfo Bug #778338 [release.debian.org] unblock: file/1:5.22+15-1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 778338: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778338 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b778338.14247304857547.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#778554: unblock: systemd/215-12
On 2015-02-17 15:11, Martin Pitt wrote: Hey Niels, Niels Thykier [2015-02-16 20:10 +0100]: I have not had time to review this fully. However, I noticed #778565, which suggests a regression in this version of udev. I am putting this unblock request on hold until you have had a time to review #778565. Michael and I responded to that and asked for some more information and log output. This looks very dubious, given that udev hardly changed at all in 215-12 except for blacklisting the mmcblkb-*rpmb devices (which are totally unrelated). Noted, as mentioned in a different mail, I have decided to unblock this. [...] Personally, I am leaning towards (2) in the absence of a patch/diff for (3). The bug trail has a pointer to the experimental fix for this: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?h=experimentalid=929bece5326 But anyway, this will not cover the edge cases that the (rather vocal) reporters of #755722 are concerned about, e. g. if the machine is always offline. So (3) is probably not a full solution yet, and this might require some more adjustment in fsck or other places. Ok. Though, as I understood the link to the upstream date, part of the reason for not sync'ing the time was to make it easier on live-CDs. Is this the sort of change that will break live-CDs? If so, what will it take to not break live-CDs with (2) (or possibly (3)). I figure this rather means live CDs are not supposed to touch the system, and syncing the hw clock to a potentially wrong time of a live system is bad. However, that's precisely what has happenend under sysvinit (through util-linux' /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh) all the years; that's what I meant with bug compatible to sysvinit :-) However, with (3) we'd essentially get the same behaviour if the live system gets network connectivity. Personally I'm leaning towards the hwclock-save.service (2) or even ignoring this (1). Martin In lack of anything else to distinguish them, my preference is to go with same bugs as usual - so that would make (2). It also have the advantage of users will perceive fewer issues with the systemd. Admittedly, I presume a migration to (3) in Stretch will be no easier or harder given we go with (2). Thanks, ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54eb9f15.3010...@thykier.net
Bug#779013: jessie-pu: package phppgadmin/5.1-1
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: jessie
Severity: normal
Hello
phppgadmin is a web application that supports apache2.2
When upgrading to Jessie that contains apache 2.4, the application
doesn't work anymore. See #669837.
The proposed update fixes that important issue.
It is unclear whether it is ok to bump the severity of #669837 to RC: In
a way, you can move and fix the apache conf file around yourself so it
may not be RC, but another point of view is that if you had the package
working on wheezy, upgrading to jessie just always breaks it. I'd like
to have your opinion on that. If you agree the severity can be bumped to
RC, then we could just unblock phppgadmin/5.1-1.1
Attached is the full debdiff, that will be for Jessie 8.1 I suppose.
Please double check the first line of the changelog, I'm a bit lost
about how to proceed with versionning, and I assumed
testing-proposed-update will become proposed-update when jessie is released.
Regarding the patch itself, using dh_apache2 is not a trivial change,
but I believe it is less complex that trying to fix things by doing
things manually in maintainer scripts.
The only unnecessary thing I see there is that we stop creating obsolete
/etc/apache2/conf.d/ directory, which is a good thing imho.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
diff -Nru phppgadmin-5.1/debian/changelog phppgadmin-5.1/debian/changelog
--- phppgadmin-5.1/debian/changelog 2013-04-18 12:37:03.0 +0200
+++ phppgadmin-5.1/debian/changelog 2015-02-20 18:21:14.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,20 @@
+phppgadmin (5.1-1+deb8u1) testing; urgency=low
+
+ * Non maintainer upload.
+ * Changes for apache2.4 settings (Closes: #669837)
+. Upgrade phppgadmin.conf restriction to localhost to 2.4 format.
+. Update rules:
+Use --with apache2 in rules.
+No longer copying apache.conf, dh_apache2 does that.
+. Rename apache.conf into phppgadmin.conf.
+. Drop /etc/apache2/conf.d from dirs.
+. Remove manual reload of apache in maintainer scripts, dh_apache2 does it
+ automatically.
+. Build-depends on dh-apache2.
+. Use {$misc:Suggests} so apache2 is no longer a direct Depends.
+
+ -- Jean-Michel Nirgal Vourgère jmv_...@nirgal.com Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:01:15 +
+
phppgadmin (5.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff -Nru phppgadmin-5.1/debian/control phppgadmin-5.1/debian/control
--- phppgadmin-5.1/debian/control 2013-04-18 11:39:06.0 +0200
+++ phppgadmin-5.1/debian/control 2015-02-20 18:04:29.0 +0100
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Uploaders: Peter Eisentraut pet...@debian.org
Section: web
Priority: extra
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7.0.50~)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 7.0.50~), dh-apache2
Standards-Version: 3.9.3
Homepage: http://phppgadmin.sourceforge.net/
Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-postgresql/phppgadmin.git
@@ -11,9 +11,9 @@
Package: phppgadmin
Architecture: all
-Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libapache2-mod-php5 | php5-cgi, php5-pgsql, apache2 | httpd,
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libapache2-mod-php5 | php5-cgi, php5-pgsql,
libjs-jquery
-Recommends: postgresql-doc
+Recommends: ${misc:Recommends}, postgresql-doc
Suggests: postgresql, slony1-bin
Description: web-based administration tool for PostgreSQL
phpPgAdmin is a web-based administration tool for PostgreSQL. It is perfect
diff -Nru phppgadmin-5.1/debian/dirs phppgadmin-5.1/debian/dirs
--- phppgadmin-5.1/debian/dirs 2013-04-18 11:39:06.0 +0200
+++ phppgadmin-5.1/debian/dirs 2015-02-20 10:28:52.0 +0100
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
usr/share/phppgadmin
usr/share/phppgadmin/conf
etc/phppgadmin
-etc/apache2/conf.d
diff -Nru phppgadmin-5.1/debian/phppgadmin.apache2 phppgadmin-5.1/debian/phppgadmin.apache2
--- phppgadmin-5.1/debian/phppgadmin.apache2 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ phppgadmin-5.1/debian/phppgadmin.apache2 2015-02-20 10:28:52.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+conf debian/phppgadmin.conf
diff -Nru phppgadmin-5.1/debian/phppgadmin.conf phppgadmin-5.1/debian/phppgadmin.conf
--- phppgadmin-5.1/debian/phppgadmin.conf 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ phppgadmin-5.1/debian/phppgadmin.conf 2015-02-20 10:28:52.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+Alias /phppgadmin /usr/share/phppgadmin
+
+Directory /usr/share/phppgadmin
+
+DirectoryIndex index.php
+AllowOverride None
+
+# Only allow connections from localhost:
+Require local
+
+IfModule mod_php5.c
+ php_flag magic_quotes_gpc Off
+ php_flag track_vars On
+ #php_value include_path .
+/IfModule
+IfModule !mod_php5.c
+ IfModule mod_actions.c
+IfModule mod_cgi.c
+ AddType application/x-httpd-php .php
+ Action
Bug#779067: unblock: wine/1.6.2-20
package: release.debian.org
user: release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags: unblock
severity: normal
Please consider unblocking wine. I know its rather late for fixing
important bugs, but this one was just filed. There is currently a
missing relationship to libasound2-plugins, which can leave users
without working audio by default (bug #779002).
This change has been present in wine-development for almost a year.
unblock wine/1.6.2-20
diff -Nru wine-1.6.2/debian/changelog wine-1.6.2/debian/changelog
--- wine-1.6.2/debian/changelog 2015-01-18 13:01:44.0 -0500
+++ wine-1.6.2/debian/changelog 2015-02-23 01:08:22.0 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+wine (1.6.2-20) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Recommend libasound2-plugins (closes: #779002).
+
+ -- Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:07:16 +
+
wine (1.6.2-19) unstable; urgency=medium
* Fix typo in libwine-alsa.maintscript (closes: #774861).
diff -Nru wine-1.6.2/debian/control wine-1.6.2/debian/control
--- wine-1.6.2/debian/control 2015-01-18 13:02:52.0 -0500
+++ wine-1.6.2/debian/control 2015-02-23 01:08:55.0 -0500
@@ -116,6 +116,8 @@
libfreetype6,
libgl1-mesa-dri,
libwine-gecko-2.21
+Recommends:
+ libasound2-plugins,
Breaks:
wine ( 1.6.1-9),
wine-bin ( 1.5.31-1),
@@ -142,6 +144,7 @@
Replaces:
wine ( 1.6.1-9),
Recommends:
+ libasound2-plugins,
wine32 (= ${source:Version}),
Description: Windows API implementation - 64-bit binary loader
Wine is a free MS-Windows API implementation.
diff -Nru wine-1.6.2/debian/control.in wine-1.6.2/debian/control.in
--- wine-1.6.2/debian/control.in 2015-01-10 14:21:31.0 -0500
+++ wine-1.6.2/debian/control.in 2015-02-23 01:06:52.0 -0500
@@ -116,6 +116,8 @@
libfreetype6,
libgl1-mesa-dri,
libwine-gecko-2.21
+Recommends:
+ libasound2-plugins,
Breaks:
wine ( 1.6.1-9),
wine-bin ( 1.5.31-1),
@@ -142,6 +144,7 @@
Replaces:
wine ( 1.6.1-9),
Recommends:
+ libasound2-plugins,
wine32 (= ${source:Version}),
Description: Windows API implementation - 64-bit binary loader
Wine is a free MS-Windows API implementation.
Bug#779075: unblock: partman-target/94
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: d-i User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, This package already got unblocked by the RT; we just need waiting for a d-i ack. It fixes two RC bugs (according to Britney): #757413, #761815 The changelog is: Changes: partman-target (94) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Steve McIntyre ] * Don't add entries for random USB media to /etc/fstab, they're not useful. Closes: #761815 NB: AFAICT #757413 is a duplicate of #761815 that was closed manually after upload. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150224075155.4433.48413.report...@mangetsu.thykier.net
Bug#778554: unblock: systemd/215-12
Hello Niels, Niels Thykier [2015-02-23 22:43 +0100]: Noted, as mentioned in a different mail, I have decided to unblock this. Thanks. In lack of anything else to distinguish them, my preference is to go with same bugs as usual - so that would make (2) Right, probably the best bet for jessie now. Admittedly, I presume a migration to (3) in Stretch will be no easier or harder given we go with (2). Correct. We don't have that extra unit in experimental, and don't intend to put it there. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150224055637.ga3...@piware.de
Bug#779059: unblock: qmail-run/2.0.2+nmu1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package qmail-run It moves a file needed during postinst from /usr/share/doc/qmail-run to /usr/share/qmail-run. #775052 Andreas unblock qmail-run/2.0.2+nmu1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150223232925.19587.9634.report...@zam581.zam.kfa-juelich.de
