Bug#790254: marked as done (nmu: ovito_2.3.3-3)

2015-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:05:19 +0200
with message-id 55925bcf.40...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#790254: nmu: ovito_2.3.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #790254,
regarding nmu: ovito_2.3.3-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
790254: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790254
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hello,

the recent tachyon package upgrade comes with a minor library transition:
it appears that ovito is the only package that depends on tachyon for now,
and that this unique dependency currently blocks the migration of the tachyon
package from unstable to testing. The current ovito package may rebuild against
the new tachyon package without issue.

Please rebuild ovito against the new tachyon package in view to unblock the
migration of the tachyon package from Sid to Stretch.

Thanks in advance,
Jerome


nmu ovito_2.3.3-3 . ALL . -m tachyon library transition
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 30/06/15 06:31, Anton Gladky wrote:
 Hi,
 
 2015-06-28 22:04 GMT+02:00 Jerome BENOIT calcu...@rezozer.net:
 I don't see ovito depending on tachyon. It build depends on it, but it 
 doesn't
 seem to depend on any of tachyon's packages. Can you say what exactly 
 depends on
 what?
 
 I have disabled tachyon plugin in ovito for the moment and removed
 it from build-depends not to keep the transition. Will try to switch
 it on with a newer ovito upstream version.

OK, closing this as no binNMU is needed then.

Cheers,
Emilio---End Message---


Bug#790622: nmu: tvc_4.2.3+dfsg-1

2015-06-30 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu tvc_4.2.3+dfsg-1 . amd64 . experimental . -m Rebuild against 
libarmadillo5.

Some transitions happened while the package was in NEW...


Andreas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20150630123944.7952.94085.report...@zam581.zam.kfa-juelich.de



Bug#790620: nmu: obconf_1:2.0.4+git20130908-2

2015-06-30 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu obconf_1:2.0.4+git20130908-2 . ALL . experimental . -m Rebuild against 
openbox 3.6.0

That is the experimental part of the ongoing openbox transition in sid.


Andreas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20150630122951.7576.53184.report...@zam581.zam.kfa-juelich.de



Bug#790622: marked as done (nmu: tvc_4.2.3+dfsg-1)

2015-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:55:38 +0200
with message-id 55929fda.9090...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#790622: nmu: tvc_4.2.3+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #790622,
regarding nmu: tvc_4.2.3+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
790622: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790622
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu tvc_4.2.3+dfsg-1 . amd64 . experimental . -m Rebuild against 
libarmadillo5.

Some transitions happened while the package was in NEW...


Andreas
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 30/06/15 14:39, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
 Package: release.debian.org
 Severity: normal
 Tags: experimental
 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
 Usertags: binnmu
 
 nmu tvc_4.2.3+dfsg-1 . amd64 . experimental . -m Rebuild against 
 libarmadillo5.
 
 Some transitions happened while the package was in NEW...

Done.

Emilio---End Message---


Bug#790620: marked as done (nmu: obconf_1:2.0.4+git20130908-2)

2015-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:56:26 +0200
with message-id 5592a00a.4060...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#790620: nmu: obconf_1:2.0.4+git20130908-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #790620,
regarding nmu: obconf_1:2.0.4+git20130908-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
790620: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790620
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu obconf_1:2.0.4+git20130908-2 . ALL . experimental . -m Rebuild against 
openbox 3.6.0

That is the experimental part of the ongoing openbox transition in sid.


Andreas
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 30/06/15 14:29, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
 Package: release.debian.org
 Severity: normal
 Tags: experimental
 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
 Usertags: binnmu
 
 nmu obconf_1:2.0.4+git20130908-2 . ALL . experimental . -m Rebuild against 
 openbox 3.6.0
 
 That is the experimental part of the ongoing openbox transition in sid.

Done.

Thanks,
Emilio---End Message---


Bug#745475: broken auto-removal logic

2015-06-30 Thread Mattias Ellert
tor 2014-11-20 klockan 08:14 +0100 skrev Julien Cristau:
 On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 07:23:28 +0100, Mattias Ellert wrote:
 
  I would like to propose to increase the severity of this bug back 
  to
  serious. I find it extremely disruptive.
  
 No, this bug is very much not serious.
 
 Cheers,
 Julien

I strongly disagree with this assessment.

This happens again and again and again. It is very far from very much
not serious.

Mattias


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Bug#786713: marked as done (transition: libwps)

2015-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jul 2015 01:52:27 +0200
with message-id 55932bbb.5020...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#786713: transition: libwps
has caused the Debian Bug report #786713,
regarding transition: libwps
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
786713: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786713
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

libwps 0.4.0 changed API of one function (and thus also SONAME).

It is already in NEW since May 17.

Reverse dependencies (source):

# grep-dctrl -FDepends libwps -sSource 
/var/lib/apt/lists/http.debian.net_debian_dists_sid_main_binary-amd64_Packages 
| sort | uniq
Source: abiword (3.0.0-8)
Source: calligra (1:2.8.5+dfsg-1)
Source: libreoffice
Source: libwps
Source: writerperfect

- writerperfect 0.9.3 (in experimental) already was adapted for 0.4.0 and uses
  it. Will upload to sid together with libwps itself
- libreoffice
  - 5.0.0 beta1 requires it (5.0.0 final will be there end of July already)
  - the patch committed for 5.0.0 beta1[0] also applies to 4.3.3, should work.
Will upload to sid together with libwps itself. It's a bit bigger because
it also adds support for new file formats but if ththe full one doesn't work
we can strip it down.
- abiword and calligra
  - don't have official patches/upstream work yet (they even didn't get the
last transition done upstream...) but the change is easy and except the
change of the .pc mainly a one-liner[1] for both. 
I'd upload abiword myself (orphaned; QA upload, collab-maint..) and file
a bug for calligra

Of course we should wait for it to be out of NEW first.
Ben file:

title = libwps;
is_affected = .depends ~ libwps-0.3-3 | .depends ~ libwps-0.4-4;
is_good = .depends ~ libwps-0.4-4;
is_bad = .depends ~ libwps-0.3-3;

Regards,

Rene

[0]
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/writerperfect/source/calc/MSWorksCalcImportFilter.cxx?id=f9568335a653f72732f9c8ebf007cf8850021ff9

[1]
+--- calligra-2.8.5+dfsg.orig/filters/words/works/import/WPSImport.cpp
 calligra-2.8.5+dfsg/filters/words/works/import/WPSImport.cpp
+@@ -43,7 +43,9 @@ private:
+ bool _isSupportedFormat(librevenge::RVNGInputStream *input, const char * 
/* password */)
+ {
+ libwps::WPSKind kind = libwps::WPS_TEXT;
+-libwps::WPSConfidence confidence = 
libwps::WPSDocument::isFileFormatSupported(input, kind);
++libwps::WPSCreator creator;
++bool needsEncoding;
++libwps::WPSConfidence confidence = 
libwps::WPSDocument::isFileFormatSupported(input, kind, creator, needsEncoding);
+ if ((libwps::WPS_TEXT != kind) || (confidence != 
libwps::WPS_CONFIDENCE_EXCELLENT))
+ {
+ fprintf(stderr, ERROR: We have no confidence that you are giving 
us a valid Microsoft Works document.\n);

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.8
  APT prefers oldstable
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: armhf (armv7l)

Kernel: Linux 3.4.79-sun7i (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 21/06/15 11:26, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
 On 16/06/15 19:49, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
 Let's do this after libreoffice migrates (which should happen soon,
 when evolution-data-server is ready).
 
 britney was broken because of a problem in the archive, but that's now fixed 
 and
 everything migrated. You can proceed with this.

This was waiting for writerperfect, which just migrated, and the old libwps was
removed from testing. Closing.

Cheers,
Emilio---End Message---


Bug#787668: marked as done (transition: qtbase-opensource-src)

2015-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jul 2015 01:49:13 +0200
with message-id 55932af9.6030...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#787668: transition: qtbase-opensource-src
has caused the Debian Bug report #787668,
regarding transition: qtbase-opensource-src
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
787668: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787668
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi RT! We are near ready to push the new Qt5 version to unstable, so
I'm filling this bug in order to get you informed.

I'll reply to it when we are ready to go.

Kinds regards, Lisandro.

Ben file:

title = qtbase-opensource-src;
is_affected = .depends ~ qtbase-abi-5-3-2 | .depends ~ qtbase-abi-5-4-2;
is_good = .depends ~ qtbase-abi-5-4-2;
is_bad = .depends ~ qtbase-abi-5-3-2;

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_AR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_AR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 26/06/15 04:23, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
 On Thursday 25 June 2015 23:20:45 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
 Just because IRC is not the official way of doing this: we are ready to
 binNMU calibre.
 
 Which you already did. You are wonderfull :)

And this just migrated:

qtbase-opensource-src | 5.4.2+dfsg-4| testing  | source
qtbase-opensource-src | 5.4.2+dfsg-4| unstable | source

Good job as usual :)

Cheers,
Emilio---End Message---


Processed (with 2 errors): block 790626 with 789447, merging 790626 790533, tagging 790626

2015-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 block 790626 with 789447
Bug #790626 [src:octave] octave: FTBFS with GNU Texinfo 6: Argument of \\ has 
an extra }
790626 was not blocked by any bugs.
790626 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 790626: 789447
 merge 790626 790533
Bug #790626 [src:octave] octave: FTBFS with GNU Texinfo 6: Argument of \\ has 
an extra }
Unable to merge bugs because:
blocks of #790533 is '789447' not ''
blockedby of #790533 is '' not '789447'
Failed to merge 790626: Did not alter merged bugs.

 tags 790626 + stretch sid
Failed to alter tags of Bug 790626: failed to get lock on 
/org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/790626 -- Unable to lock 
/org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/790626 Resource temporarily unavailable.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/790626 Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/790626 Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/790626 Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/790626 Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/790626 Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/790626 Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/790626 Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/790626 Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629.
Unable to lock /org/bugs.debian.org/spool/lock/790626 Resource temporarily 
unavailable at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 629.
 at /usr/local/lib/site_perl/Debbugs/Common.pm line 587.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
790533: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790533
790626: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790626
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.143569945731009.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#790692: wheezy-pu: package ftpd-ssl/0.17.33+0.3-1+deb7u1

2015-06-30 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hello all,

I would like to proceed with an update also to
oldstable/wheezy of the SSL-enhanced FTP server
built from linux-ftpd-ssl. It deals with the
same denial of service as was established in
the report #788331, and the remedy is identical
to the one applied to testing as well has been
queued for jessie-pu. The relevant debdiff is
herewith attached.

Best regards,
  Mats Erik Andersson, present maintainer of linux-ftpd-ssl.
diff -Nru linux-ftpd-ssl-0.17.33+0.3/debian/changelog 
linux-ftpd-ssl-0.17.33+0.3/debian/changelog
--- linux-ftpd-ssl-0.17.33+0.3/debian/changelog 2011-04-20 03:47:23.0 
+0200
+++ linux-ftpd-ssl-0.17.33+0.3/debian/changelog 2015-06-30 01:04:24.0 
+0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+linux-ftpd-ssl (0.17.33+0.3-1+deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=medium
+
+  * QA Upload
+  * NLST of empty directory results in segfault. (Closes: #788331)
++ debian/patches/500-ssl.diff: Updated.
+
+ -- Mats Erik Andersson mats.anders...@gisladisker.se  Tue, 30 Jun 2015 
01:04:03 +0200
+
 linux-ftpd-ssl (0.17.33+0.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Update to linux-ftpd 0.17-33.
diff -Nru linux-ftpd-ssl-0.17.33+0.3/debian/patches/500-ssl.diff 
linux-ftpd-ssl-0.17.33+0.3/debian/patches/500-ssl.diff
--- linux-ftpd-ssl-0.17.33+0.3/debian/patches/500-ssl.diff  2011-04-20 
03:47:23.0 +0200
+++ linux-ftpd-ssl-0.17.33+0.3/debian/patches/500-ssl.diff  2015-06-16 
13:46:42.0 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Origin: 
ftp://ftp.uni-mainz.de/pub/software/security/ssl/SSL-MZapps/linux-ftpd-0.17+ssl-0.3.diff.gz
 Forwarded: not-needed
 Author: Tim Hudson t...@cryptsoft.com
-Last-Update: 2010-06-21
+Last-Update: 2015-06-11
 
 Index: linux-ftpd-ssl/ftpd/Makefile
 ===
@@ -917,10 +917,12 @@
byte_count += strlen(nbuf) + 1;
}
}
-@@ -2705,6 +3193,13 @@
+@@ -2704,8 +3193,16 @@
+   reply(226, Transfer complete.);
  
transflag = 0;
-   if (dout != NULL)
+-  if (dout != NULL)
++  if (dout != NULL) {
 +#ifdef USE_SSL
 +if (ssl_data_active_flag  (ssl_data_con!=NULL)) {
 +  SSL_free(ssl_data_con);
@@ -929,8 +931,10 @@
 +  }
 +#endif /* USE_SSL */
(void) fclose(dout);
++  }
data = -1;
pdata = -1;
+ out:
 @@ -2792,3 +3287,223 @@
  }
  #endif/* TCPWRAPPERS */


Processed: unblock 790626 with 789447, block 789447 with 790626, merging 790626 790533, tagging 790626

2015-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 unblock 790626 with 789447
Bug #790626 [src:octave] octave: FTBFS with GNU Texinfo 6: Argument of \\ has 
an extra }
790626 was blocked by: 789447
790626 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 790626: 789447
 block 789447 with 790626
Bug #789447 [release.debian.org] transition: qscintilla2
789447 was blocked by: 790533
789447 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 789447: 790626
 merge 790626 790533
Bug #790626 [src:octave] octave: FTBFS with GNU Texinfo 6: Argument of \\ has 
an extra }
Bug #790533 [src:octave] octave: FTBFS on multiple archs during binNMU for 
qscintilla2 transition
The source octave and version 3.8.2-4+b1 do not appear to match any binary 
packages
Marked as found in versions octave/3.8.2-4.
Added tag(s) upstream and confirmed.
Bug #790626 [src:octave] octave: FTBFS with GNU Texinfo 6: Argument of \\ has 
an extra }
The source octave and version 3.8.2-4+b1 do not appear to match any binary 
packages
Marked as found in versions octave/3.8.2-4+b1.
Merged 790533 790626
 tags 790626 + stretch sid
Bug #790626 [src:octave] octave: FTBFS with GNU Texinfo 6: Argument of \\ has 
an extra }
Bug #790533 [src:octave] octave: FTBFS on multiple archs during binNMU for 
qscintilla2 transition
Added tag(s) sid and stretch.
Added tag(s) sid and stretch.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
789447: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789447
790533: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790533
790626: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790626
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.14357002664507.transcr...@bugs.debian.org