Bug#796952: english language release notes pdf file is not english (https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes.en.pdf)

[Holger Wansing]

Hi,

Norbert Preining  wrote:
> Hi everyone, esp release managers
> 
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787759
> 
> There are two bugs, one is the broken fonts, one is the
> broken dvipdfmx for t1 fonts.
> 
> > This mail made me think about the status of this ...
> 
> I asked release managers quite some time ago:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2015/08/msg00902.html
> but it turned out that answers were never delivered to me.
> 
> Niels opened a bug for that:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796952
> with X-Debbugs-Cc lines in the pseudo header, but these emails
> seem to be never delivered to me (no appearance in my collected
> debian-tex mailbox).
> 
> ANyway, I have seen the answer of Niels only *now*!!!
> 
> So, release managers: What do you suggest? What are the time lines
> for the next point release? I will happily update every
> necessary package, I think I have still the git branch for it.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Norbert

Counting on the usual cycle for point releases, one could imagine 
8.4 for April or May 2016.

So, could this bug now be planned to be fixed in 8.4?

Release managers?


Holger


-- 

Created with Sylpheed 3.5.0 under
D E B I A N   L I N U X   8 . 0   " J E S S I E " .

Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/

Bug#796952: english language release notes pdf file is not english (https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes.en.pdf)

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Sat, 2016-02-13 at 10:45 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Norbert Preining  wrote:
> > Hi everyone, esp release managers
> > 
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787759
> > 
> > There are two bugs, one is the broken fonts, one is the
> > broken dvipdfmx for t1 fonts.
[...]
> So, could this bug now be planned to be fixed in 8.4?

I have to admit that I'm not really keen on approving an update which
consists of "add this tar to the source package". I'm also still not
sure why the suggestion is to add the changes via such a binary update
rather than a patch - I appreciate that the changes might be large, but
that doesn't preclude being able to produce an actual diff.

(Codebases where patches can't be backported also really don't thrill me
with an SRM hat on, but that's another matter.)

Regards,

Adam

Bug#814595: nmu: apertium_3.4.0~r61013-5

[Andreas Beckmann]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu apertium_3.4.0~r61013-5 . mips . unstable . -m "Rebuild with 
liblttoolbox3-3.3-0v5."

Looks like this was built against the temporarily reinstated 
liblttoolbox3-3.3-0.

apertium builds a M-A:same library, so maybe more architectures than
just mips should be rebuilt.


Andreas

Bug#814595: marked as done (nmu: apertium_3.4.0~r61013-5)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 13 Feb 2016 11:59:00 +0100
with message-id <56bf0c74.9080...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#814595: nmu: apertium_3.4.0~r61013-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #814595,
regarding nmu: apertium_3.4.0~r61013-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
814595: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814595
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu apertium_3.4.0~r61013-5 . mips . unstable . -m "Rebuild with 
liblttoolbox3-3.3-0v5."

Looks like this was built against the temporarily reinstated 
liblttoolbox3-3.3-0.

apertium builds a M-A:same library, so maybe more architectures than
just mips should be rebuilt.


Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 13/02/16 11:32, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> nmu apertium_3.4.0~r61013-5 . mips . unstable . -m "Rebuild with 
> liblttoolbox3-3.3-0v5."
> 
> Looks like this was built against the temporarily reinstated 
> liblttoolbox3-3.3-0.

Scheduled.

> apertium builds a M-A:same library, so maybe more architectures than
> just mips should be rebuilt.

Shrug.

Emilio--- End Message ---

Bug#810568: openexr transition

[Andreas Beckmann]

# missed binNMU due to being built/installed late
nmu exactimage_0.9.1-12 . mips64el . -m "Rebuild against libopenexr22 and 
libilmbase12."

# failed with ICE, new gcc version is now in sid, so try again
gb gmic_1.6.8-3+b1 . mips64el

ben is unsure about the state of about openimageio/mips64el,
but I cannot see anything "old" (i.e. /6v5/) in the build log.


Andreas

Bug#810568: openexr transition

[Andreas Beckmann]

On 2016-02-13 12:07, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> ben is unsure about the state of about openimageio/mips64el,
> but I cannot see anything "old" (i.e. /6v5/) in the build log.

caused by libopenimageio1.5v5 cruft, so

nmu blender_2.76.b+dfsg0-3 . mips64el . -m "Rebuild against libopenimageio1.6."


Andreas

Processed: Re: Bug#814442: jessie-pu: package postgresql-9.1/9.1.20-0+deb8u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #814442 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package 
postgresql-9.1/9.1.20-0+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
814442: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814442
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#814442: jessie-pu: package postgresql-9.1/9.1.20-0+deb8u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 16:18 +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> with today's postgresql-9.1 9.1.20-0+deb7u1 security update in wheezy,
> the package version in wheezy is now greater than the one in jessie.
> This no-change (in pl/perl) upload fixes that.

Flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#785053: jessie-pu: package nss-pam-ldapd/0.9.4-3+deb8u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #785053 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package nss-pam-ldapd/0.9.4-3
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
785053: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785053
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#785053: jessie-pu: package nss-pam-ldapd/0.9.4-3+deb8u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 21:52 +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-01 at 17:16 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Apologies for the repeated delay. :-| Please go ahead.
> 
> Just when I wanted to wrap this up, another important bug popped up
> with a trivial fix :)
> 
> The bug is #811476 which has a trivial fix that has been in testing for
> a long time and affects people who put IPv6 addresses in LDAP. A patch
> that can be dropped in debian/patches is attached.
> 
> To not delay this process much longer I'll upload 0.9.4-3+deb8u1 with
> the fixes for #759544, #794686 and #794068 which were previously
> approved in about a week.

It was actually nearer a month, but it got uploaded and I've just
flagged it for acceptance.

In order to not confuse things, please open a second bug for any
additional fixes on top of 0.9.4-3+deb8u1.

Regards,

Adam

Bug#810597: transition: gnutls28

[Andreas Beckmann]

This binNMU seems to have been missed so far ...

nmu mod-gnutls_0.7.2-2 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against libgnutls30."


Andreas

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: libgcrypt20_1.6.3-2+deb8u1_allonly.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libgcrypt20_1.6.3-2+deb8u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libgcrypt20_1.6.3-2+deb8u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libgcrypt20_1.6.3-2+deb8u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libgcrypt20_1.6.3-2+deb8u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libgcrypt20_1.6.3-2+deb8u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libgcrypt20_1.6.3-2+deb8u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libgcrypt20_1.6.3-2+deb8u1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libgcrypt20_1.6.3-2+deb8u1_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libgcrypt20_1.6.3-2+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libgcrypt20_1.6.3-2+deb8u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss-pam-ldapd_0.9.4-3+deb8u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.20-0+deb8u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT

Bug#814609: nmu: mbt_3.2.12-1 zeromq3_4.1.4-1

[Andreas Beckmann]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu mbt_3.2.12-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuilt against libticcutils2v5."
nmu zeromq3_4.1.4-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against libsodium18."

There were transitions in sid recently.


Andreas

Bug#804246: marked as done (transition: gsl)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:59:49 +0100
with message-id <56bf28c5.4030...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#804246: transition: gsl
has caused the Debian Bug report #804246,
regarding transition: gsl
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
804246: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804246
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gsl.html

An uncoordinated transition to GSL 2.0 has started in unstable.

It caused nco to FTBFS and I suspect other reverse dependencies will
likewise need to be updated to build successfully with gsl (2.0+dfsg-1).

The automatically created transition tracker is already available.

The maintainer is CC'ed.

Kind Regards,

Bas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 06/11/15 15:06, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gsl.html
> 
> An uncoordinated transition to GSL 2.0 has started in unstable.
> 
> It caused nco to FTBFS and I suspect other reverse dependencies will
> likewise need to be updated to build successfully with gsl (2.0+dfsg-1).
> 
> The automatically created transition tracker is already available.
> 
> The maintainer is CC'ed.

This is finally over.

Cheers,
Emilio--- End Message ---

Bug#814609: marked as done (nmu: mbt_3.2.12-1 zeromq3_4.1.4-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:03:27 +0100
with message-id <56bf299f.2080...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#814609: nmu: mbt_3.2.12-1 zeromq3_4.1.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #814609,
regarding nmu: mbt_3.2.12-1 zeromq3_4.1.4-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
814609: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814609
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu mbt_3.2.12-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuilt against libticcutils2v5."
nmu zeromq3_4.1.4-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against libsodium18."

There were transitions in sid recently.


Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 13/02/16 13:56, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> nmu mbt_3.2.12-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuilt against libticcutils2v5."
> nmu zeromq3_4.1.4-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against libsodium18."
> 
> There were transitions in sid recently.

Thanks. Scheduled.

Emilio--- End Message ---

Bug#810597: transition: gnutls28

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

On 13/02/16 13:43, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> This binNMU seems to have been missed so far ...
> 
> nmu mod-gnutls_0.7.2-2 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against libgnutls30."

Scheduled (plus the sid-only).

Emilio

Bug#813128: Fwd: Bug#813128: transition: openmpi

[Mattia Rizzolo]

Ok, This part of the transition is going well enough, modulo #814183.
As you may know, I switched the mpi-defaults in s390x and x32 to use
openmpi instead of mpich, now that openmpi builds there too.
No the default MPI implementation is the same in all release
architectures, which is nice per se.

From what I can see in the past there were no rebuilds for this, but (as
also others pointed out elsewhere) it would only make sense.
There are also packages already failing to build due to dependencies
being built against mpich but now building against openmpi.

According to my grepping the packages affected are a strict subset of
the ones doing this transition.  In particular, attached there is a
list dived in levels as of reported by the auto-openmpi tracker.

A handful needs sourceful changes, I already done a couple and I'll do
the rest too.

I welcome any comments on the plan, or please schedule the
appropriated rebuilds.

-- 
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540  .''`.
more about me:  http://mapreri.org  : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-
LEVEL 1

aces3
arpack
blacs-mpi => DONE
boost1.55
boost1.58
cctools
dune-grid
gerris
gmsh
gpaw
hdf5 => SOURCEFUL UPDATE NEEDED
hppc
hyphy
hypre
mpi4py
mpqc
mrbayes
mrmpi
otf
palabos
parmetis => NON-FREE
ray
regina-normal
rmpi
scotch
spooles
tachyon
valgrind
yorick

LEVEL 2

adios
elkcode
gfsview
gromacs => SOURCEFUL UPDATE NEEDED
gyoto
lammps
libghemical => NOT mpi-defaults
libgpiv
mathgl
meep-mpi-default
mpb
netpipe => NOT mpi-defaults, SOURCEFUL UPDATE NEEDED
openmx
paraview
scalapack => DONE
silo-llnl
starpu
tessa
vtk
vtk6

LEVEL 3

esys-particle
eztrace => SOURCEFUL UPDATE NEEDED
gpiv
gpivtools
ligghts
nwchem

LEVEL 4

cp2k
espresso
freefem++
petsc

LEVEL 5

slepc

LEVEL 6

dolfin
getdp


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#814614: nmu: ceph_0.94.5-1

[Andreas Beckmann]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu ceph_0.94.5-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild with debhelper (>= 
9.20151126)."

ceph/experimental was built with a buggy debhelper w.r.t. init.d scripts
handling.


Andreas

Bug#814651: jessie-pu: package sitesummary/0.1.17+deb8u1

[Petter Reinholdtsen]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

The sitesummary package in stable is affected by two RC bugs, one giving
uninstallation problems, the other causing hangs in the postinst.  The
following patch will solve it.  The change is already in unstable and
testing.

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 231a412..e165579 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+sitesummary (0.1.17+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium
+
+  * Backport RC fixes from unstable.
+
+  [ Dominik George ]
+  * Fix hanging postinst script (Closes: #785214).
+  * Fix dangling symlink in apache config after removal (Closes: #785215, 
#794606).
+
+ -- Petter Reinholdtsen   Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:34:24 +0100
+
 sitesummary (0.1.17) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * Fix installation problem when sitesummary is preseeded to update
diff --git a/debian/sitesummary.postinst b/debian/sitesummary.postinst
index 031b9f4..910d81a 100644
--- a/debian/sitesummary.postinst
+++ b/debian/sitesummary.postinst
@@ -41,21 +41,6 @@ EOF
 
 case "$1" in
 configure)
-# Enable it on fresh installations as before Apache 2.4.  Check for
-# cgi.load existence to avoid trying to configure when installed after
-# apache2 is unpacked but not yet configured (bug #760084).
-if [ -z "$2" ] && \
-[ -e /etc/apache2/mods-available/cgi.load ] && \
-[ -e /usr/share/apache2/apache2-maintscript-helper ] ; then
-. /usr/share/apache2/apache2-maintscript-helper
-apache2_invoke enmod cgi.load
-apache2_invoke enconf sitesummary.conf
-fi
-
-# Make sure the cgi script can write to the storage area
-   chown www-data /var/lib/sitesummary/tmpstorage \
-   /var/lib/sitesummary/entries 
-
 # If the config file is missing, check debconf to see if the
 # munin configuration feature should be enabled.  This hidden
 # debconf question allow preseeding during installation.
@@ -82,6 +67,24 @@ case "$1" in
update-rc.d -f sitesummary-client remove >/dev/null 2>&1 || :
fi
 
+# Close debconf file handles before restarting Apache
+db_stop
+
+# Enable it on fresh installations as before Apache 2.4.  Check for
+# cgi.load existence to avoid trying to configure when installed after
+# apache2 is unpacked but not yet configured (bug #760084).
+if [ -z "$2" ] && \
+[ -e /etc/apache2/mods-available/cgi.load ] && \
+[ -e /usr/share/apache2/apache2-maintscript-helper ] ; then
+. /usr/share/apache2/apache2-maintscript-helper
+apache2_invoke enmod cgi.load
+apache2_invoke enconf sitesummary.conf
+fi
+
+# Make sure the cgi script can write to the storage area
+   chown www-data /var/lib/sitesummary/tmpstorage \
+   /var/lib/sitesummary/entries 
+
;;
 
 abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure)
diff --git a/debian/sitesummary.prerm b/debian/sitesummary.prerm
new file mode 100644
index 000..62eb441
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/sitesummary.prerm
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+set -e
+
+case "$1" in
+remove)
+# Enable it on fresh installations as before Apache 2.4.  Check for
+# cgi.load existence to avoid trying to configure when installed after
+# apache2 is unpacked but not yet configured (bug #760084).
+if [ -z "$2" ] && \
+[ -e /usr/share/apache2/apache2-maintscript-helper ] ; then
+. /usr/share/apache2/apache2-maintscript-helper
+apache2_invoke disconf sitesummary.conf
+fi
+;;
+*)
+echo "prerm called with unknown argument \`$1'" >&2
+exit 1
+;;
+esac
+
+exit 0

I would like to update the stable version of sitesummary to fix this bug
affecting Debian Edu.  Are you OK with me uploading a package with this
change?

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: nss-pam-ldapd_0.9.4-3+deb8u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss-pam-ldapd_0.9.4-3+deb8u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss-pam-ldapd_0.9.4-3+deb8u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss-pam-ldapd_0.9.4-3+deb8u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss-pam-ldapd_0.9.4-3+deb8u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss-pam-ldapd_0.9.4-3+deb8u1_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss-pam-ldapd_0.9.4-3+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nss-pam-ldapd_0.9.4-3+deb8u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.20-0+deb8u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.20-0+deb8u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.20-0+deb8u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.20-0+deb8u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.20-0+deb8u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.20-0+deb8u1_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.20-0+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: postgresql-9.1_9.1.20-0+deb8u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT

Bug#814614: marked as done (nmu: ceph_0.94.5-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 13 Feb 2016 20:43:48 +0100
with message-id <56bf8774.1080...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#814614: nmu: ceph_0.94.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #814614,
regarding nmu: ceph_0.94.5-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
814614: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814614
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu ceph_0.94.5-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild with debhelper (>= 
9.20151126)."

ceph/experimental was built with a buggy debhelper w.r.t. init.d scripts
handling.


Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 13/02/16 14:29, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> nmu ceph_0.94.5-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild with debhelper (>= 
> 9.20151126)."
> 
> ceph/experimental was built with a buggy debhelper w.r.t. init.d scripts
> handling.

Scheduled.

Emilio--- End Message ---

Bug#810568: openexr transition

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

On 13/02/16 12:17, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2016-02-13 12:07, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> ben is unsure about the state of about openimageio/mips64el,
>> but I cannot see anything "old" (i.e. /6v5/) in the build log.
> 
> caused by libopenimageio1.5v5 cruft, so
> 
> nmu blender_2.76.b+dfsg0-3 . mips64el . -m "Rebuild against 
> libopenimageio1.6."

All three scheduled.

Emilio

NEW changes in oldstable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: nginx_1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nginx_1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nginx_1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nginx_1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nginx_1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4_ia64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nginx_1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nginx_1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4_kfreebsd-i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nginx_1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nginx_1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nginx_1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nginx_1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4_s390.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nginx_1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: nginx_1.2.1-2.2+wheezy4_sparc.changes
  ACCEPT

Bug#796952: english language release notes pdf file is not english (https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes.en.pdf)

[Norbert Preining]

Hi Adam,

> I have to admit that I'm not really keen on approving an update which
> consists of "add this tar to the source package". I'm also still not

Understandable.

> sure why the suggestion is to add the changes via such a binary update
> rather than a patch - I appreciate that the changes might be large, but
> that doesn't preclude being able to produce an actual diff.

I can do a patch, that is the easiest part of course, but it will
be huge.

> (Codebases where patches can't be backported also really don't thrill me
> with an SRM hat on, but that's another matter.)

They can, if someone could identify the single patch and try to get
it working in the old code base - which has been severly rewritten
in hthe meantime.

I can try for that, but I have *no* idea when how and if it works out.

All the best

Norbert


PREINING, Norbert   http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
GPG: 0x860CDC13   fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0  ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13

Bug#796952: english language release notes pdf file is not english (https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes.en.pdf)

[Norbert Preining]

> So, could this bug now be planned to be fixed in 8.4?

I forgot to add - even if we do *NOT* want to fix dvipdfmx, there is
an easy way around, do not use type1 but otf/ttf fonts.

I have advised this to the Russian reporter and done it myself
for all release notes. It is damned easy to choose a different font.

Norbert


PREINING, Norbert   http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
GPG: 0x860CDC13   fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0  ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13