NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: ruby-standalone_0.5+deb8u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-standalone_0.5+deb8u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-standalone_0.5+deb8u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-standalone_0.5+deb8u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-standalone_0.5+deb8u1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-standalone_0.5+deb8u1_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-standalone_0.5+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-standalone_0.5+deb8u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: ruby-standalone_0.5+deb8u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT

Processed: Re: Bug#815060: Encouraging removal of nvidia kernel modules from Debian non-free archive.

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #815060 [ftp.debian.org, src:nvidia-graphics-modules] RM: 
nvidia-graphics-modules -- RoQA; Violates kernel license
Bug reassigned from package 'ftp.debian.org, src:nvidia-graphics-modules' to 
'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #815060 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #815060 to the same values 
previously set
> clone -1 -2 -3
Bug #815060 [ftp.debian.org] RM: nvidia-graphics-modules -- RoQA; Violates 
kernel license
Bug 815060 cloned as bugs 815525-815526
> reassign -2 release.debian.org
Bug #815525 [ftp.debian.org] RM: nvidia-graphics-modules -- RoQA; Violates 
kernel license
Bug reassigned from package 'ftp.debian.org' to 'release.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #815525 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #815525 to the same values 
previously set
> tag -2 jessie
Bug #815525 [release.debian.org] RM: nvidia-graphics-modules -- RoQA; Violates 
kernel license
Added tag(s) jessie.
> retitle -2 RM: nvidia-graphics-modules/340.96+3.16.0+1
Bug #815525 [release.debian.org] RM: nvidia-graphics-modules -- RoQA; Violates 
kernel license
Changed Bug title to 'RM: nvidia-graphics-modules/340.96+3.16.0+1' from 'RM: 
nvidia-graphics-modules -- RoQA; Violates kernel license'
> reassign -3 release.debian.org
Bug #815526 [ftp.debian.org] RM: nvidia-graphics-modules -- RoQA; Violates 
kernel license
Bug reassigned from package 'ftp.debian.org' to 'release.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #815526 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #815526 to the same values 
previously set
> tag -3 wheezy
Bug #815526 [release.debian.org] RM: nvidia-graphics-modules -- RoQA; Violates 
kernel license
Added tag(s) wheezy.
> retitle -3 RM: nvidia-graphics-modules/304.131+3.2.0+1
Bug #815526 [release.debian.org] RM: nvidia-graphics-modules -- RoQA; Violates 
kernel license
Changed Bug title to 'RM: nvidia-graphics-modules/304.131+3.2.0+1' from 'RM: 
nvidia-graphics-modules -- RoQA; Violates kernel license'

-- 
815060: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815060
815525: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815525
815526: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815526
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#815520: jessie-pu: package fglrx-driver/1:15.9-4~deb8u2 xvba-video_0.8.0-9+deb8u1

[Andreas Beckmann]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hi,

the last fglrx-driver update in jessie brought a small regression:
updates with xvba-va-driver installed fail due to a file overwrite
conflict (#813427).
xvba-va-driver is currently uninstallable in jessie.
xvba-va-driver is no longer needed as a separate package, instead
libfglrx-amdxvba1 brings equivalent files.

We need to update both packages to fix this issue.

The updated src:fglrx-driver package adds proper Breaks+Replaces against
the xvba-va-driver package currently in jessie.

The updated src:xvba-video package turns xvba-va-driver into an
installable empty dummy package. That's less intrusive than removing it
while ensuring that a clean upgrade path exists.

Let's do the discussion with this one bug here and clone it once it
reached confirmed state.


Andreas
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog	(revision 1603)
+++ debian/changelog	(revision 1604)
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+fglrx-driver (1:15.9-4~deb8u2) jessie; urgency=medium
+
+  * libfglrx-amdxvba1: Add Breaks+Replaces: xvba-va-driver (<< 0.8.0-9+deb)
+since we now ship fglrx_drv_video.so and xvba_drv_video.so.
+(Closes: #813427)
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann   Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:31:06 +0100
+
 fglrx-driver (1:15.9-4~deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium
 
   * Rebuild for jessie.
Index: debian/control
===
--- debian/control	(revision 1603)
+++ debian/control	(revision 1604)
@@ -122,8 +122,11 @@
  xvba-va-driver,
 Conflicts:
  libxvbaw1,
+Breaks:
+ xvba-va-driver (<< 0.8.0-9+deb),
 Replaces:
  libxvbaw1,
+ xvba-va-driver (<< 0.8.0-9+deb),
 Description: AMD XvBA (X-Video Bitstream Acceleration) backend for VA API${fglrx:VariantDescSuffix}
  X-Video Bitstream Acceleration (XvBA), designed by AMD for its (ATI) Radeon GPU
  and Fusion APU, is an arbitrary extension of the X video extension (Xv) for the
Index: debian/rules
===
--- debian/rules	(revision 1604)
+++ debian/rules	(revision 1605)
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
 override_dh_auto_install:
 	dh_auto_install
 	rm -f debian/xvba-va-driver/$(libdir)/dri/*.la
+	$(RM) debian/xvba-va-driver/$(libdir)/dri/fglrx_drv_video.so
+	$(RM) debian/xvba-va-driver/$(libdir)/dri/xvba_drv_video.so
 
 override_dh_installchangelogs:
 	dh_installchangelogs NEWS
Index: debian/control
===
--- debian/control	(revision 1604)
+++ debian/control	(revision 1605)
@@ -23,9 +23,11 @@
 Pre-Depends:
  dpkg (>= 1.15.6~),
 Depends:
- libfglrx-amdxvba1 | libfglrx-legacy-amdxvba1,
+ libfglrx-amdxvba1 (>= 1:15.9),
  ${shlibs:Depends},
  ${misc:Depends}
+Breaks:
+ libfglrx-legacy-amdxvba1,
 Provides:
  va-driver
 Description: XvBA-based backend for VA API (AMD fglrx implementation)
Index: debian/changelog
===
--- debian/changelog	(revision 1604)
+++ debian/changelog	(revision 1605)
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+xvba-video (0.8.0-9+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium
+
+  * xvba-va-driver as a separate package has been obsoleted by
+fglrx-driver 1:15.9, turn it into an empty metapackage.
+  * Stop shipping fglrx_drv_video.so and xvba_drv_video.so.  (Closes: #813427)
+  * Bump Depends on libfglrx-amdxvba1 to (>= 1:15.9) which provides them.
+  * This breaks compatibility with libfglrx-legacy-amdxvba1 (package exists
+only in wheezy-backports).
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann   Mon, 22 Feb 2016 01:05:30 +0100
+
 xvba-video (0.8.0-9) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   [ Patrick Matthäi ]

Bug#815517: jessie-pu: package unbound/1.4.22-3+deb8u1

[Robert Edmonds]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hi,

The unbound package in jessie has outdated root DNS server address hints
for h.root-servers.net, see #815370. I'd like to upload a new version to
jessie with the following changes.

Thanks!

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index af91f28..2c6d115 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+unbound (1.4.22-3+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium
+
+  * iterator/iter_hints.c: Update hints for H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET
+(Closes: #815370)
+
+ -- Robert Edmonds   Sun, 21 Feb 2016 18:36:43 -0500
+
 unbound (1.4.22-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Fix CVE-2014-8602: denial of service by making resolver chase endless
diff --git a/iterator/iter_hints.c b/iterator/iter_hints.c
index 7fa07a7..8e51424 100644
--- a/iterator/iter_hints.c
+++ b/iterator/iter_hints.c
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ compile_time_root_prime(int do_ip4, int do_ip6)
if(!ah(dp, "E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.", "192.203.230.10")) goto failed;
if(!ah(dp, "F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.", "192.5.5.241"))   goto failed;
if(!ah(dp, "G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.", "192.112.36.4"))  goto failed;
-   if(!ah(dp, "H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.", "128.63.2.53"))   goto failed;
+   if(!ah(dp, "H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.", "198.97.190.53")) goto failed;
if(!ah(dp, "I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.", "192.36.148.17")) goto failed;
if(!ah(dp, "J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.", "192.58.128.30")) goto failed;
if(!ah(dp, "K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.", "193.0.14.129"))  goto failed;
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ compile_time_root_prime(int do_ip4, int do_ip6)
if(!ah(dp, "A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.", "2001:503:ba3e::2:30")) goto failed;
if(!ah(dp, "D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.", "2001:500:2d::d")) goto failed;
if(!ah(dp, "F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.", "2001:500:2f::f")) goto failed;
-   if(!ah(dp, "H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.", "2001:500:1::803f:235")) goto failed;
+   if(!ah(dp, "H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.", "2001:500:1::53")) goto failed;
if(!ah(dp, "I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.", "2001:7fe::53")) goto failed;
if(!ah(dp, "J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.", "2001:503:c27::2:30")) goto failed;
if(!ah(dp, "K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.", "2001:7fd::1")) goto failed;

-- 
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: sane-backends_1.0.24-8+deb8u1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: vsftpd_3.0.2-17+deb8u1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: ruby-standalone_0.5+deb8u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT

Bug#815356: jessie-pu: package ruby-standalone/0.5+deb8u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 13:49 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:36:34AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> > 
> > On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 22:05 -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > I would like to upload a stable update for ruby-standalone, that makes
> > > it work correctly with bundler, which is a very important use case.
> > 
> > Please go ahead.
> 
> just uploaded; thanks.

Flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#815356: jessie-pu: package ruby-standalone/0.5+deb8u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #815356 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package ruby-standalone/0.5+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
815356: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815356
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#815469: jessie-pu: package osmo/0.2.12-1+deb8u1

[Markus Koschany]

Am 21.02.2016 um 20:22 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 19:46 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> I would like to update Osmo in Jessie because the internal data backup
>> function on i386 is broken and it produces only a 50 bytes empty file.
>> This will lead to invalid data when user's try to restore the backup.
>>
>> This is Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/813414
> 
> Please go ahead.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Adam

Uploaded. Thanks.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#815469: jessie-pu: package osmo/0.2.12-1+deb8u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #815469 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package osmo/0.2.12-1+deb8u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
815469: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815469
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#815469: jessie-pu: package osmo/0.2.12-1+deb8u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + confirmed

On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 19:46 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I would like to update Osmo in Jessie because the internal data backup
> function on i386 is broken and it produces only a 50 bytes empty file.
> This will lead to invalid data when user's try to restore the backup.
> 
> This is Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/813414

Please go ahead.

Regards,

Adam

Re: 8.4 and 7.10 planning

[Donald Norwood]

On 02/21/2016 08:13 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:24:35 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We're due both Jessie and Wheezy point releases, and are proposing doing
>> both on the same weekend again, as we did for 8.2 and 7.9, as the CD
>> team seem happy to try it again.
>>
>> Some suggested dates:
>>
>> March 12th / 13th
>> March 19th / 20th
>> March 26th / 27th - Easter, holiday weekend in at least the UK
>> April 2nd / 3rd
March 12/13 is no good (Steve) and March 26/27 is Easter holiday as well
in the US.

Although the publicity team is flexible on the date ranges,  April 2/3
seem to be the better of the date ranges as the delay would give Ben
time to push the kernel updates.

Best regards,

Donald Norwood



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#815469: jessie-pu: package osmo/0.2.12-1+deb8u1

[Markus Koschany]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hello,

I would like to update Osmo in Jessie because the internal data backup
function on i386 is broken and it produces only a 50 bytes empty file.
This will lead to invalid data when user's try to restore the backup.

This is Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/813414

The debdiff is attached.

Regards,

Markus
diff -Nru osmo-0.2.12/debian/changelog osmo-0.2.12/debian/changelog
--- osmo-0.2.12/debian/changelog	2014-10-15 14:20:21.0 +0200
+++ osmo-0.2.12/debian/changelog	2016-02-21 19:36:29.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+osmo (0.2.12-1+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium
+
+  * Add libarchive-i386.patch.
+Fix corrupt data backup on i386.
+Thanks to Christian Buchmüller for the report and Maxim Gordienko for the
+patch. (Closes: #813414)
+
+ -- Markus Koschany   Sun, 21 Feb 2016 19:35:43 +0100
+
 osmo (0.2.12-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Imported Upstream version 0.2.12.
diff -Nru osmo-0.2.12/debian/patches/libarchive-i386.patch osmo-0.2.12/debian/patches/libarchive-i386.patch
--- osmo-0.2.12/debian/patches/libarchive-i386.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ osmo-0.2.12/debian/patches/libarchive-i386.patch	2016-02-21 19:36:29.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+From: Maxim Gordienko
+Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 22:38:37 +0100
+Subject: libarchive i386
+
+On i386 platforms libarchive does not write the file content if
+the archived file content is set only with archive_entry_copy_stat().
+
+Forwarded: http://sourceforge.net/p/osmo-pim/code/1051/
+Debian-Bug: https://bugs.debian.org/813414
+---
+ src/backup.c | 1 +
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
+
+diff --git a/src/backup.c b/src/backup.c
+index 3ece5f5..ee99236 100644
+--- a/src/backup.c
 b/src/backup.c
+@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ tar_archive (const gchar *outname, GUI *appGUI)
+ 		stat (filename, );
+ 		entry = archive_entry_new ();
+ 		archive_entry_copy_stat (entry, );
++		archive_entry_set_size(entry, st.st_size);
+ 		archive_entry_set_pathname (entry, filename);
+ 		archive_write_header (archive, entry);
+ 		fd = open (filename, O_RDONLY);
diff -Nru osmo-0.2.12/debian/patches/series osmo-0.2.12/debian/patches/series
--- osmo-0.2.12/debian/patches/series	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ osmo-0.2.12/debian/patches/series	2016-02-21 19:36:29.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+libarchive-i386.patch

Bug#812887: transition: iptables

[Andreas Henriksson]

Hello!

On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 04:23:25PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 04:58:41PM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> > iptables 1.6.0 has been released and we plan to include it in debian.
> > 
> > The libxtables binary package name has been changed from libxtables10 to
> > libxtables11. However, this change seems to affect very few packages (if 
> > any).
> > 
> > Since an upload to experimental was done, a transition was set up [0].
> > Following the instructions [1] for transition, I've build-tested all
> > reverse build-deps of iptables and they seem to build simply fine:
> > 
> >  * xtables-addons: no problems
> >  * connman: no problems
> >  * west-chamer: no problems
> > 
> > So, I ask for a transition slot to upload iptables 1.6.0 to unstable.
> 
> The transition completed.

Please also binNMU iproute2 to build against the new libxtables and
pick up a new recommends, or the 'ipt' module will be/stay broken.

Regards,
Andreas Henriksson

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: sane-backends_1.0.24-8+deb8u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sane-backends_1.0.24-8+deb8u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sane-backends_1.0.24-8+deb8u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sane-backends_1.0.24-8+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: vsftpd_3.0.2-17+deb8u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: vsftpd_3.0.2-17+deb8u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: vsftpd_3.0.2-17+deb8u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: vsftpd_3.0.2-17+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: sane-backends_1.0.24-8+deb8u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sane-backends_1.0.24-8+deb8u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sane-backends_1.0.24-8+deb8u1_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sane-backends_1.0.24-8+deb8u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: vsftpd_3.0.2-17+deb8u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: vsftpd_3.0.2-17+deb8u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: vsftpd_3.0.2-17+deb8u1_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: vsftpd_3.0.2-17+deb8u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT

Bug#815356: jessie-pu: package ruby-standalone/0.5+deb8u1

[Antonio Terceiro]

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:36:34AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 22:05 -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > I would like to upload a stable update for ruby-standalone, that makes
> > it work correctly with bundler, which is a very important use case.
> 
> Please go ahead.

just uploaded; thanks.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#815036: transition: msgpack-c

[James McCoy]

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:46:53PM -0500, James McCoy wrote:
> FTBFS:
> 
> * webdis:
>   + #811343 filed with patch
> * tmate:
>   + New upstream version is needed
>   + Will file a bug for this

Filed #815381.

> * kumofs:
>   + configure script expects the C++ library (libmsgpack) and therefore
> fails
>   + Trivial patch to remove that expectation leads to a compile failure
> due to mixing code with C and C++ linkage
>   + No upstream activity in 5+ years
>   + Debian maintainer MIA

Given the above and a popcon of 5, should an RM bug be filed?

> * libdata-messagepack-stream-perl:
>   + This likely needs a newer version of libdata-messagepack-perl, which
> hasn't been uploaded yet

Confirmed that a newer libdata-messagepack-perl is needed.  There is a
patch in the Debian repo which helps, but a more complete patch is
proposed upstream[0].

[0]: https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack-perl/pull/22

>   + Needs to be adapted to new msgpack-c API.  I have some patches I can
> send in that regard.

I've provided patches for this upstream[1] and opened bug #815433 to
track this.

[1]: https://github.com/typester/Data-MessagePack-Stream/issues/6

Cheers,
-- 
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy 

Bug#814716: marked as done (jessie-pu: package apt-offline/1.5.1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 19:14:46 +0530
with message-id <1456062286.4681.3.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#814716: jessie-pu: package apt-offline/1.5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #814716,
regarding jessie-pu: package apt-offline/1.5.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
814716: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814716
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

There are 2 bugs reported to me privately about functionality broken in
apt-offline, in the version shipped in Jessie.

Bug 1: apt-offline only look into /etc/apt/trusted.gpg for key
verification. This results in most apt data not to be installed because
the debian (archive) keyring resides in /usr/share/keyrings

Bug 2: Because of the last minute changes in 1.5.x release, the file
detection plugin had some output changes that led to .gpg data
represented differently by different plugins.


Both bugs were known and are already fixed in the current 1.7.x release
in Unstable/Testing.


This request is to backport those changes for Stable. The patch has been
verified by the user who reported the bug to me. I've also verified the
patch in a Jessie container, and it seems to not break anything.

root@learner:~# apt-offline -v
1.5.2
root@learner:~# apt-offline install /var/tmp/lxc/jessie.zip 
gpgv: Signature made Sat Jan 23 18:49:39 2016 IST using RSA key ID 46925553
gpgv: Good signature from "Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (7.0/wheezy) 
"
gpgv: Signature made Sat Jan 23 18:49:39 2016 IST using RSA key ID 2B90D010
gpgv: Good signature from "Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (8/jessie) 
"
gpgv: Signature made Sat Jan 23 18:55:24 2016 IST using RSA key ID 518E17E1
gpgv: Good signature from "Jessie Stable Release Key 
"
/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/httpredir.debian.org_debian_dists_jessie_Release 
synced.
/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/httpredir.debian.org_debian_dists_jessie_Release.gpg 
synced.
/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/httpredir.debian.org_debian_dists_jessie_main_binary-amd64_Packages.bz2
 synced.
/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/httpredir.debian.org_debian_dists_jessie_main_i18n_Translation-en.bz2
 synced.




Please give me an ACK on this email, and then I will go ahead and upload
it for Stable (Jessie) inclusion. The debdiff is attached with this bug
report.




-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.3.5+ (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_IN.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_IN.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
diff -Nru apt-offline-1.5.1/apt_offline_core/AptOfflineCoreLib.py apt-offline-1.5.2/apt_offline_core/AptOfflineCoreLib.py
--- apt-offline-1.5.1/apt_offline_core/AptOfflineCoreLib.py	2015-11-18 19:37:20.0 +0530
+++ apt-offline-1.5.2/apt_offline_core/AptOfflineCoreLib.py	2016-02-14 20:53:21.0 +0530
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
 
 
 app_name = "apt-offline"
-version = "1.5"
+version = "1.5.2"
 myCopyright = "(C) 2005 - 2014 Ritesh Raj Sarraf"
 terminal_license = "This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.\n\
 This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under\n\
@@ -915,15 +915,37 @@
 class APTVerifySigs:
 
 def __init__(self, gpgv=None, keyring=None):
+self.defaultPaths = ['/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/', '/usr/share/keyrings/']
+
 if gpgv is None:
 self.gpgv="/usr/bin/gpgv"
 else:
 self.gpgv=gpgv
-
+
+self.opts = []
 if keyring is None:
-self.opts="--keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --ignore-time-conflict"
+
+self.opts.append("--ignore-time-conflict ")
+
+#INFO: For backwards compatibility
+if os.path.exists("/etc/apt/trusted.gpg"):
+self.opts.extend("--keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg".split())
+
+for eachPath in self.defaultPaths:
+

Bug#796952: english language release notes pdf file is not english (https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes.en.pdf)

[Norbert Preining]

Hi Julien,

> Thanks!  I've applied your variant2 patch and installed fonts-sil-charis
> on www-master.

Ok, not optimal, but not too bad. Maybe we should discuss proper font
selection before the next release.

If there are any further problems, please don't hesitate to contact me!

All the best

Norbert


PREINING, Norbert   http://www.preining.info
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
GPG: 0x860CDC13   fp: F7D8 A928 26E3 16A1 9FA0  ACF0 6CAC A448 860C DC13

Re: 8.4 and 7.10 planning

[Julien Cristau]

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:24:35 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> We're due both Jessie and Wheezy point releases, and are proposing doing
> both on the same weekend again, as we did for 8.2 and 7.9, as the CD
> team seem happy to try it again.
> 
> Some suggested dates:
> 
> March 12th / 13th
> March 19th / 20th
> March 26th / 27th - Easter, holiday weekend in at least the UK
> April 2nd / 3rd
> 
Should all work for me.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: 8.4 and 7.10 planning

[Ben Hutchings]

On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 12:24 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We're due both Jessie and Wheezy point releases, and are proposing doing
> both on the same weekend again, as we did for 8.2 and 7.9, as the CD
> team seem happy to try it again.
> 
> Some suggested dates:
> 
> March 12th / 13th
> March 19th / 20th
> March 26th / 27th - Easter, holiday weekend in at least the UK
> April 2nd / 3rd

I was planning stable updates for the kernel but haven't uploaded to
either suite yet, so I would prefer one of the later dates.  But of
course this can slip to the next point release.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Time is nature's way of making sure that everything doesn't happen at once.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: sane-backends_1.0.24-8+deb8u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: vsftpd_3.0.2-17+deb8u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT

Processed: Re: Bug#809319: jessie-pu: package sane-backends/1.0.24-8

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #809319 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package sane-backends/1.0.24-8
Bug #797769 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package sane-backends/1.0.24-8
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
797769: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797769
809319: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=809319
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#809319: jessie-pu: package sane-backends/1.0.24-8

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 09:36 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 02/21/2016 07:38 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> > I have no upload rights. So I ask my sponsor to upload it. But he
> > has a lot of work in his job.
> > 
> > It's fine if someone can upload it. The package is on mentors[1].
> 
> I'm taking care of it right now. No worries.

Uploaded and flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#785047: vsftpd/3.0.2-17+deb8u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #785047 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package vsftpd/3.0.2-17
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
785047: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785047
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#785047: vsftpd/3.0.2-17+deb8u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 11:56 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
> 
> On 02/21/2016 11:08 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> >> @Joerg: Could you re-upload the package to mentors?
> >> 
> > 
> > done.. [1]
> 
> Reopening since I am preparing the upload now.

Uploaded and flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Re: 8.4 and 7.10 planning

[Steve McIntyre]

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:24:35PM +, Adam Barratt wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We're due both Jessie and Wheezy point releases, and are proposing doing
>both on the same weekend again, as we did for 8.2 and 7.9, as the CD
>team seem happy to try it again.
>
>Some suggested dates:
>
>
>March 12th / 13th
not a chance for me, I'll be on a plane back from a conf in Thailand.

>March 19th / 20th
fine

>March 26th / 27th
(probably) fine

>April 2nd / 3rd
fine

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"Since phone messaging became popular, the young generation has lost the
 ability to read or write anything that is longer than one hundred and sixty
 characters."  -- Ignatios Souvatzis

NEW changes in oldstable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: cpio_2.11+dfsg-0.1+deb7u2_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cpio_2.11+dfsg-0.1+deb7u2_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cpio_2.11+dfsg-0.1+deb7u2_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cpio_2.11+dfsg-0.1+deb7u2_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cpio_2.11+dfsg-0.1+deb7u2_ia64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cpio_2.11+dfsg-0.1+deb7u2_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cpio_2.11+dfsg-0.1+deb7u2_kfreebsd-i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cpio_2.11+dfsg-0.1+deb7u2_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cpio_2.11+dfsg-0.1+deb7u2_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cpio_2.11+dfsg-0.1+deb7u2_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cpio_2.11+dfsg-0.1+deb7u2_s390.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cpio_2.11+dfsg-0.1+deb7u2_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: cpio_2.11+dfsg-0.1+deb7u2_sparc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: dbconfig-common_1.8.47+nmu1+deb7u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: didiwiki_0.5-11+deb7u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: didiwiki_0.5-11+deb7u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: didiwiki_0.5-11+deb7u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: didiwiki_0.5-11+deb7u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: didiwiki_0.5-11+deb7u1_ia64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: didiwiki_0.5-11+deb7u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: didiwiki_0.5-11+deb7u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: didiwiki_0.5-11+deb7u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: didiwiki_0.5-11+deb7u1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: didiwiki_0.5-11+deb7u1_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: didiwiki_0.5-11+deb7u1_s390.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: didiwiki_0.5-11+deb7u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: didiwiki_0.5-11+deb7u1_sparc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xdelta3_3.0.0.dfsg-1+deb7u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xdelta3_3.0.0.dfsg-1+deb7u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xdelta3_3.0.0.dfsg-1+deb7u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xdelta3_3.0.0.dfsg-1+deb7u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xdelta3_3.0.0.dfsg-1+deb7u1_ia64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xdelta3_3.0.0.dfsg-1+deb7u1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xdelta3_3.0.0.dfsg-1+deb7u1_kfreebsd-i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xdelta3_3.0.0.dfsg-1+deb7u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xdelta3_3.0.0.dfsg-1+deb7u1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xdelta3_3.0.0.dfsg-1+deb7u1_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xdelta3_3.0.0.dfsg-1+deb7u1_s390.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xdelta3_3.0.0.dfsg-1+deb7u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xdelta3_3.0.0.dfsg-1+deb7u1_sparc.changes
  ACCEPT

8.4 and 7.10 planning

[Adam D. Barratt]

Hi,

We're due both Jessie and Wheezy point releases, and are proposing doing
both on the same weekend again, as we did for 8.2 and 7.9, as the CD
team seem happy to try it again.

Some suggested dates:

March 12th / 13th
March 19th / 20th
March 26th / 27th - Easter, holiday weekend in at least the UK
April 2nd / 3rd

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#784915: jessie-pu: package rsnapshot/1.3.1-4

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #784915 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package rsnapshot/1.3.1-4
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
784915: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784915
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#814269: jessie-pu: package nettle/2.7.1-5

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + confirmed

On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 20:59 +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> OK to upload fix for https://bugs.debian.org/813679 (CVE-2015-8803
> CVE-2015-8804 CVE-2015-8805), as suggested by (a member of) the
> security team? (Security-related bugs but unlikely to be exploitable.)

Assuming that the resulting package has been tested on Jessie, please go
ahead.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#814269: jessie-pu: package nettle/2.7.1-5

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #814269 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package nettle/2.7.1-5
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
814269: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814269
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#813916: transition: gdal

[Sebastiaan Couwenberg]

On 19-02-16 14:08, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 12-02-16 19:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 12/02/16 18:52, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> On 12-02-16 18:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
 On 06/02/16 17:43, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to the recently released
> GDAL 1.11.4. Only the packages using C++ symbols need to be rebuilt.
>
> GDAL 2.0.2 was released along with 1.11.4, but we still don't have
> support for GDAL 2.0 in all reverse dependencies. Since the transition
> to GDAL 1.11.3, support for GDAL 2.0 was added to all reverse
> depedencies except Fiona [0]. Upstream has recently included changes for
> GDAL 2.0, but these differ from the initial GDAL 2.0 changes available
> as a patch in #802808. The improved GDAL 2.0 changes are entangled with
> other changes for the upcoming Fiona 1.7 release, which I've not been
> able to successfully backport. This will not be a blocker for the GDAL
> 2.0 transition, as discussed with the maintainer on the debian-gis list
> [1].
>
> Because the transition for GDAL 1.11.4 is ready now, I'd like to do that
> first before preparing the transition to GDAL 2.0. All reverse
> dependencies rebuilt successfully with GDAL 1.11.4, the summary of
> rebuilds is included below.
>

 This would get entangled with the openmpi transition, so it will have to 
 wait.
 After openmpi, I'm thinking about doing libpng, but we'll see.
>>>
>>> Waiting for openmpi is no problem, but if the libpng transition is going
>>> to happen first, I think it's better to use that time the prepare the
>>> transition to GDAL 2.0 instead of 1.11.4. Last week the last blocker was
>>> resolved [0], so we're also pretty much ready to transition to GDAL 2.0.
>>> The 2.0 packages will have to pass the NEW queue again, because of the
>>> delay that will cause I've opted to transition to 1.11.4 which is ready now.
>>>
>>> If you can confirm that the libpng transition is going to happen first,
>>> I'll upload the packages for GDAL 2.0 to experimental, and we can switch
>>> to that in unstable after the libpng transition and the new gdal has
>>> passed NEW.
>>
>> Sure, let's do that.
> 
> The GDAL 2.0.2 packages are available in experimental and ready for
> transition.
> 
> libgdal-grass (2.0.2-1) not available in experimental yet, liblas and
> grass need to be rebuilt with GDAL 2.0 before it can be built too,
> because the SOVERSION is included in the binary package it builds the
> package will have to pass the NEW queue after upload first. To get it
> passed the NEW queue, I'll rebuild liblas & grass with gdal
> (2.0.2-1-1~exp2) from experimental and upload all three to experimental too.

libgdal-grass (2.0.2-1~exp1) and its dependencies are in experimental
now too.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: amavisd-new_2.10.1-2~deb8u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT

Processed: tagging 728906

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 728906 - moreinfo
Bug #728906 [release.debian.org] pu: package netbeans/7.0.1+dfsg1-6
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
728906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728906
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#813071: jessie-pu: package amavisd-new/1:2.10.1-2

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 13:24 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt"  writes:
> 
> > You've dropped the epoch in the new stanza. With that fixed, please feel
> > free to upload.
> 
> Have had confirmation that the change solves the problem. Fixed the
> version and uploaded.

Thanks; flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#813071: jessie-pu: package amavisd-new/1:2.10.1-2

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #813071 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package amavisd-new/1:2.10.1-2
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
813071: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813071
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#782596: marked as done (RFC: possible wheezy-pu: package debhelper to address #708218 for wheezy?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:11:23 +
with message-id <2016022123.gv6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#782596: RFC: possible wheezy-pu: package debhelper to 
address #708218 for wheezy?
has caused the Debian Bug report #782596,
regarding RFC: possible wheezy-pu: package debhelper to address #708218 for 
wheezy?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
782596: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782596
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi Stable release managers,

This is not a wheezy-pu request per se. The recent libxrender update
through security.d.o was initially just a rebuild of libxrender
against a fixed version of libx11. This caused #782505 ("libxrender1:
dist-upgrade breaks on multiarch due to conflict on
changelog.Debian.gz").

The fix for debhelper in #708218 didn't make it into wheezy so binNMUs
in wheezy for multiarch enabled packages will have the problem.

Would it make sense to have an update of debhelper in wheezy fixing
this issue as well?

Regards,
Salvatore
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 22:21:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> 
> On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 23:09 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > On 2015-04-14 17:47, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> [...]
> > > The fix for debhelper in #708218 didn't make it into wheezy so binNMUs
> > > in wheezy for multiarch enabled packages will have the problem.
> > > 
> > > Would it make sense to have an update of debhelper in wheezy fixing
> > > this issue as well?
> [...]
> > >From a debhelper PoV, it looks reasonable at first glance.
> > 
> > It looks like we would need to backport the 4 commits listed in the
> > attached "...-commits.diff" file.  The combined result (excluding
> > changelog entries) is in the "...-dh_installchangelogs.diff" and had no
> > merge conflicts (only one chunk required fuzziness to be applied).
> 
> The diff looks okay to me, but...
> 
> > Except a missing changelog entry, is the expected debdiff for such an
> > upload.  Disclaimer, not tested (not even build tested).
> 
> ... that needs addressing before we can consider an upload. :)
> 
No followup since last April.  Closing now.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#770821: marked as done (wheezy-pu: package soprano/2.7.6+dfsg.1-2wheezy2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:09:16 +
with message-id <20160221110916.ga30...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#707301: wheezy-pu: make soprano co-installable with 
multiarch-enabled ODBC drivers
has caused the Debian Bug report #770821,
regarding wheezy-pu: package soprano/2.7.6+dfsg.1-2wheezy2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
770821: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770821
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release-notes
Severity: important


Hello,
Working through release notes, everythign looks good until you get to 

apt-get dist-upgrade

I have found a bug for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645726

which says it was fixed in the upstream version but this does not allow for 
dist-upgrade. This is a second computer that it had happend on in our company.

apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Failed
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 odbcinst1debian2 : Breaks: tdsodbc (< 0.82-8) but 0.82-7 is to be installed
E: Error, pkgProblemResolver::Resolve generated breaks, this may be caused by 
held packages.


Solution:
Current solution to this problem is to remove the package.

What I have done is 
 apt-get remove odbcinst1debian2 
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  libjaxp1.3-java libntfs10 libdb4.7-java fgfs-base libdb4.7-java-gcj libproj0 
libogdi3.2 libcoin60 freetds-common ttf-lyx libxerces-c28
  lm-sensors libopenthreads13 libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 libgeos-c1 proj-data 
fancontrol proj-bin libplib1 libgeos-3.2.0 libsysfs2 libpq5
  libhdf4-0-alt libxcb-render-util0 libnetcdf6 libsmpeg0
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
The following extra packages will be installed:
  libgnutls26 libp11-kit0 libssl1.0.0 virtuoso-opensource-6.1-bin
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  flightgear libgdal1-1.6.0 libopenscenegraph65 libvirtodbc0 odbcinst 
odbcinst1debian2 python-pyodbc simgear1.9.1 sun-java6-bin sun-java6-jre
  sun-java6-plugin tdsodbc unixodbc virtuoso-minimal
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libp11-kit0 libssl1.0.0
The following packages will be upgraded:
  libgnutls26 virtuoso-opensource-6.1-bin
2 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 14 to remove and 873 not upgraded.
Need to get 6,017 kB of archives.
After this operation, 265 MB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y



Then just to make sure..I did
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade

At this point the 
apt-get dist-upgrade allowed me to upgrade my system. 

If you could mention that in the release notes. tdsodbc will need to be 
reinstalled after upgrade.

Thank you,
Lucas





-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.7
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 13:22:19 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:

> reassign 707301 soprano
> found 707301 2.7.6+dfsg.1-2wheezy1
> retitle 707301 make soprano co-installable with multiarch-enabled ODBC drivers
> clone 707301 -1
> reassign -1 release.debian.org
> block -1 by 707301
> severity -1 normal
> tags -1 + wheezy
> User release.debian@packages.debian.org
> usertag -1 + pu
> retitle -1  wheezy-pu: package soprano/2.7.6+dfsg.1-2wheezy2
> # this upload still needs to happen and agreed on upon the soprano
> # maintainers...!
> thanks
> 
> Hi,
> 
> appearantly soprano is not co-installable with multiarch-enabled ODBC drivers 
> as explained and patched by Steve in 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707301#29
> 
> I'm not fully convinced this patch is appropriate in stable at this time (but 
> then I should also say that I'm mostly clueless about this issue too...), so 
> probably the -1 bug should be reassigned to release-notes or closed after 
> all... but that's easy enough to do, so that's why.
> 
AFAICT there was no followup or diff sent to the release.d.o bug in the
last year and a half; closing.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#756986: marked as done (wheezy-pu: package debian-lan-config/0.13~bpo70+5)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:04:18 +
with message-id <20160221110418.gt6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#756986: wheezy-pu: package 
debian-lan-config/0.13~bpo70+5
has caused the Debian Bug report #756986,
regarding wheezy-pu: package debian-lan-config/0.13~bpo70+5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
756986: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756986
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu


Dear release managers!

I would like to ask for the permission to upload and the inclusion of
the latest debian-lan-config package in the upcoming wheezy point
release.

The debian-lan-config package is kind of special, as it contains no
'program' in itself, but instructions (in a FAI config space) on how
to build a composed system within debian, cf.

   .

The package did not make it for the wheezy freeze and I provided it
via backports after the release.  However, with further improvements,
it got less and less justified to use backports, as the wheezy package
is not a strict 'backport' of the version in jessie, which is of
course targeted at jessie.

Content and history of the package is available here:

   


The package should not pose any risk to the distribution, as it needs
to be 'activated' manually to do anything at all.  To get an idea, cf.

   
.

Best regards and thanks for your consideration,

 Andi



-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Aug  4, 2014 at 10:19:00 +0200, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: wheezy
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> 
> 
> Dear release managers!
> 
> I would like to ask for the permission to upload and the inclusion of
> the latest debian-lan-config package in the upcoming wheezy point
> release.
> 
We're not normally adding completely new packages post-release, and even
less so now wheezy is almost EOL.  Closing.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#761662: marked as done (wheezy-pu: package dictionaries-common/1.12.11+deb7u1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:05:30 +
with message-id <20160221110530.gu6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#761662: wheezy-pu: package 
dictionaries-common/1.12.11+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #761662,
regarding wheezy-pu: package dictionaries-common/1.12.11+deb7u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
761662: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=761662
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hi,

For some time dictionaries-comon package has been complaining loudly with an
installation error when a debconf database corruption affecting it is found,
together with some relevant info to repair that. 

This was initially done in purpose to help debconf maintainer gather
information about the problem. Also, some recovery process for simple
corruptions was added. Usual reason for this was fixed in debconf some time
ago.

Recently, seems that some other yet unknown cause for big corruption
sometimes appears, and I has also been pointed out that accidental removal
of stuff under /var/cache/debconf has the same effect, triggering the
above mentioned installation error (http://bugs.debian.org/751367).

Some code has been added in sid to handle this better, using info provided
by packages to get a list of possible values, and using a debconf question
to warn sysadmin about the problem instead of a failure error message,
together with some other improvements like using always no-await triggers.

I have been sugested in http://bugs.debian.org/751367 to put some of this
code in a wheezy point release, and I would like to know your opinion here,

I am attaching a diff with the minimal changes I suggest to put in that
point upload. It consists of two things,

a) Select a temporary default from a list of known to be available values.
   This was formerly extracted from debconf, but it becomes unavailable if
   corruption is large.

b) Use a debconf question to warn about the problem and give advice.

Thanks very much for your time,

-- 
Agustin
diff -Nru dictionaries-common-1.12.11/debian/changelog dictionaries-common-1.12.11+deb7u1/debian/changelog
--- dictionaries-common-1.12.11/debian/changelog	2013-01-22 14:51:12.0 +0100
+++ dictionaries-common-1.12.11+deb7u1/debian/changelog	2014-07-25 16:49:17.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+dictionaries-common (1.12.11+deb7u1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Improve behavior on debconf database corruption (Closes: #751367):
+- update-default.in: Use /var/lib/dictionaries-common info as last
+  resource to try getting a default in case of debconf database
+  corruption. This should work better around installation error.
+- Use a debconf question to warn about debconf database corruption.
+
+ -- Agustin Martin Domingo   Fri, 25 Jul 2014 16:48:41 +0200
+
 dictionaries-common (1.12.11) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/control: Add Breaks against ancient myspell-cs-cz,
diff -Nru dictionaries-common-1.12.11/debian/dictionaries-common.templates dictionaries-common-1.12.11+deb7u1/debian/dictionaries-common.templates
--- dictionaries-common-1.12.11/debian/dictionaries-common.templates	2011-04-27 17:54:16.0 +0200
+++ dictionaries-common-1.12.11+deb7u1/debian/dictionaries-common.templates	2014-07-25 13:04:48.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+Template: dictionaries-common/debconf_database_corruption
+Type: note
+Description: Possible debconf database corruption
+ The setting for "${question}" is missing, but packages providing
+ candidates are installed.
+ .
+ This may be due to corruption in the debconf database. See
+ "/usr/share/doc/dictionaries-common/README.problems" on "Debconf
+ database corruption".
+ .
+ In this case, running "/usr/share/debconf/fix_db.pl" can help to put
+ the debconf database in a consistent state.
+ .
+ Some questions are likely to be asked after this message in order to
+ leave the dictionaries system in a (provisionally) working state.
+
 Template: dictionaries-common/invalid_debconf_value
 Type: note
 _Description: An invalid debconf value [${value}] has been found
@@ -108,4 +124,3 @@
  will not set the default ispell dictionary.
  .
  Use instead 'select-default-ispell' or 'select-default-wordlist' scripts.
-
diff -Nru dictionaries-common-1.12.11/scripts/system/update-default.in dictionaries-common-1.12.11+deb7u1/scripts/system/update-default.in
--- 

Bug#740435: marked as done (wheezy-pu: package arandr/0.1.7.1-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:01:16 +
with message-id <20160221110116.gr6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#740435: wheezy-pu: package arandr/0.1.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #740435,
regarding wheezy-pu: package arandr/0.1.7.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
740435: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740435
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

hello release team,

i'd like to upload a new version of arandr to stable.

arandr versions before 0.1.7.1, as described in bug #718366 (originally
#507521), completely fail to work with some combinations of x servers
(which are present in wheezy), graphics cards and output devices.


the changes between 0.1.6-1 and 0.1.7.1-1 affect +94-24 lines of python
code, that's practically the minimal patch -- i could squeeze out a line
or two where just comments are modified, no more.

the larger part of the delta between wheezy and jessie are updates to
translation files (four new languages), and the resulting changes to
changelog, news, readme and debian/copyright. add changing
standards-version and adding a debian menu file, that's it.

given the delta on the program itself is already as good as minimal, and
given that 0.1.7.1-1 has been used in unstable for half a year without
additional bugs, i'd like to ask the release team for its opinion on
uploading an unmodified 0.1.7.1-1 (as in `dch -D stable -v
0.1.7.1-1+deb7u1 -m "Unmodified upload to stable"`). a debdiff from
wheezy to jessie is attached.


if you insist on a minimal diff, i can strip 0.1.7.1 down -- but it is
my opinion that the chance of making a mistake in the course of that is
much higher than the chance of introducing a bugs by uploading the
current testing version.

please let me know which course of action you prefer in this case
chrysn
[The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
different names, permissions or owners.]

Files in second .deb but not in first
-
-rw-r--r--  root/root   /usr/share/doc/arandr/TODO.gz
-rw-r--r--  root/root   /usr/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/arandr.mo
-rw-r--r--  root/root   /usr/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES/arandr.mo
-rw-r--r--  root/root   /usr/share/locale/ko_KR/LC_MESSAGES/arandr.mo
-rw-r--r--  root/root   /usr/share/locale/uk/LC_MESSAGES/arandr.mo
-rw-r--r--  root/root   /usr/share/menu/arandr
-rw-r--r--  root/root   /usr/share/pyshared/arandr-0.1.7.1.egg-info
-rwxr-xr-x  root/root   DEBIAN/postrm
lrwxrwxrwx  root/root   
/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/arandr-0.1.7.1.egg-info -> 
../../../share/pyshared/arandr-0.1.7.1.egg-info
lrwxrwxrwx  root/root   
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/arandr-0.1.7.1.egg-info -> 
../../../share/pyshared/arandr-0.1.7.1.egg-info

Files in first .deb but not in second
-
-rw-r--r--  root/root   /usr/share/doc/arandr/TODO
-rw-r--r--  root/root   /usr/share/pyshared/arandr-0.1.6.egg-info
lrwxrwxrwx  root/root   /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/arandr-0.1.6.egg-info 
-> ../../../share/pyshared/arandr-0.1.6.egg-info
lrwxrwxrwx  root/root   /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/arandr-0.1.6.egg-info 
-> ../../../share/pyshared/arandr-0.1.6.egg-info

Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)

Depends: [-python2.7 | python2.6,-] python (>= 2.6.6-7~), python (<< 2.8), 
x11-xserver-utils | xrandr, python-gtk2
Installed-Size: [-480-] {+533+}
Version: [-0.1.6-1-] {+0.1.7.1-1+}


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 16:02:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 12:34 +0100, chrysn wrote:
> > hello adam,
> > 
> > thanks for your ping -- i've missed the original reply.
> > 
> > >That sounds like it would probably be fine, but a defdiff of the
> > >proposed package would be appreciated for confirmation. In the context
> > >of package updates, when we refer to a debdiff we usually mean one of
> > >the _source_ packages, not the resulting binar(y|ies), to indicate the
> > >actual changes to the uploaded package which result from the rebuild.
> > >
> > >The version number would need to be 0.1.7.1-1~deb7u1; otherwise it would
> > >be higher than the version in testing/unstable.
> > 
> > i've attached a debdiff to that respect, and in case you prefer to work
> > off a dsc, 

Processed: Re: Bug#804209: wheezy-pu: package fuse-exfat/0.9.7-2+deb7u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #804209 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package fuse-exfat/0.9.7-2+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
804209: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804209
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#750010: marked as done (pu: package mlmmj/1.2.18.1-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 11:01:58 +
with message-id <20160221110158.gs6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#750010: pu: package mlmmj/1.2.18.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #750010,
regarding pu: package mlmmj/1.2.18.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
750010: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=750010
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Dear release team,

Upstream for MLMMJ has released a bugfix version correcting
a few bugs, one of which is the loss of some emails in some
cases, which is IMO bad enough to deserve a correction in
Debian Stable.

The upstream ChangeLog file contains:

1.2.18.1
 o Stop mlmmj-maintd deleting list posts while they are being sent
 o Fix +list from crashing Mlmmj
 o Fix bug that made double subscription possible

I believe these are important bugfixes.

I have attached the debdiff between 1.2.18.0-2 and
1.2.18.1-1 which I just uploaded to Sid. There's a bit of
noise in this debdiff, like the Makefile.in, some doc
updates, and such. These are only updates of the GNU
tooling, and I don't believe there's much impact on
MLMMJ itself. However, the interesting part is the
last bits, with the below files updated:

src/mlmmj-maintd.c
src/send_list.c
src/subscriberfuncs.c

When filtering to only these .c files, the patch is only
138 lines long (so, much more easy to review).

So, I would like to upgrade the current Wheezy version of
MLMMJ to the upstream release 1.2.18.1. If that was not
possible from the view of the release team, then I would
like to add a patch to the current version including all
the modifications on the .c files seen in the attached
diff file.

Please let me know the stable release team view on this,

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)
diff -Nru mlmmj-1.2.18.0/aclocal.m4 mlmmj-1.2.18.1/aclocal.m4
--- mlmmj-1.2.18.0/aclocal.m4	2012-05-29 13:47:25.0 +
+++ mlmmj-1.2.18.1/aclocal.m4	2014-02-05 06:12:37.0 +
@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
-# generated automatically by aclocal 1.12 -*- Autoconf -*-
+# generated automatically by aclocal 1.12.5 -*- Autoconf -*-
+
+# Copyright (C) 1996-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 
-# Copyright (C) 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
-# 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 Free Software Foundation,
-# Inc.
 # This file is free software; the Free Software Foundation
 # gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
 # with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
@@ -26,8 +25,6 @@
 # gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
 # with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
 
-# serial 8
-
 # AM_AUTOMAKE_VERSION(VERSION)
 # 
 # Automake X.Y traces this macro to ensure aclocal.m4 has been
@@ -37,7 +34,7 @@
 [am__api_version='1.12'
 dnl Some users find AM_AUTOMAKE_VERSION and mistake it for a way to
 dnl require some minimum version.  Point them to the right macro.
-m4_if([$1], [1.12], [],
+m4_if([$1], [1.12.5], [],
   [AC_FATAL([Do not call $0, use AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([$1]).])])dnl
 ])
 
@@ -53,7 +50,7 @@
 # Call AM_AUTOMAKE_VERSION and AM_AUTOMAKE_VERSION so they can be traced.
 # This function is AC_REQUIREd by AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE.
 AC_DEFUN([AM_SET_CURRENT_AUTOMAKE_VERSION],
-[AM_AUTOMAKE_VERSION([1.12])dnl
+[AM_AUTOMAKE_VERSION([1.12.5])dnl
 m4_ifndef([AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION],
   [m4_copy([m4_PACKAGE_VERSION], [AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION])])dnl
 _AM_AUTOCONF_VERSION(m4_defn([AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION]))])
@@ -66,8 +63,6 @@
 # gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
 # with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
 
-# serial 2
-
 # For projects using AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([foo]), Autoconf sets
 # $ac_aux_dir to '$srcdir/foo'.  In other projects, it is set to
 # '$srcdir', '$srcdir/..', or '$srcdir/../..'.
@@ -121,8 +116,6 @@
 # gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
 # with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
 
-# serial 10
-
 # AM_CONDITIONAL(NAME, SHELL-CONDITION)
 # -
 # Define a conditional.
@@ -154,7 +147,6 @@
 # gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
 # with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
 
-# serial 16
 
 # There are a few dirty hacks below to avoid letting 'AC_PROG_CC' be
 # written in clear, in which case automake, when reading aclocal.m4,
@@ -166,7 +158,7 @@

Bug#804209: wheezy-pu: package fuse-exfat/0.9.7-2+deb7u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 10:26 +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 06:26:22PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> 
> Hi Adam,
> 
> > Please go ahead.
> 
> Uploaded.

This was accepted a while ago but I apparently forgot to tag it.

Regards,

Adam

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: pagekite_0.5.6d-3+deb8u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sitesummary_0.1.17+deb8u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT

Bug#731412: marked as done (pu: package am-utils/6.2+rc20110530-3.1~deb7u1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:58:47 +
with message-id <20160221105847.gp6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#731412: pu: package am-utils/6.2+rc20110530-3.1~deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #731412,
regarding pu: package am-utils/6.2+rc20110530-3.1~deb7u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
731412: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731412
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hi,

according to #722145 crashes unless the kernel version has 2 dots.
While this is not a problem with the kernel in wheezy, it will prevent
using it with newer kernels (backports, custom, vanilla, ...)

I'm not a user of am-utils and don't know how to test this change
properly. Attached is a proposed debdiff that just rebuilds the fixed
package from sid for wheezy (therefore including also a trivial change
to the texinfo manual).


Andreas
diff -u am-utils-6.2+rc20110530/debian/changelog am-utils-6.2+rc20110530/debian/changelog
--- am-utils-6.2+rc20110530/debian/changelog
+++ am-utils-6.2+rc20110530/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+am-utils (6.2+rc20110530-3.1~deb7u1) wheezy; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Rebuild for wheezy.
+
+ -- Andreas Beckmann   Thu, 05 Dec 2013 10:00:57 +0100
+
+am-utils (6.2+rc20110530-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix @sp macro usage in the texinfo manual (Closes: #713285).
+  * Fix crashes on modern kernels (Closes: #722145).
+
+ -- Andrew Shadura   Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:32:42 +0100
+
 am-utils (6.2+rc20110530-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Fixed missing build dependency on dpkg-dev
diff -u am-utils-6.2+rc20110530/debian/patches/series am-utils-6.2+rc20110530/debian/patches/series
--- am-utils-6.2+rc20110530/debian/patches/series
+++ am-utils-6.2+rc20110530/debian/patches/series
@@ -9,0 +10,2 @@
+kernel-version.patch
+fix-texi.patch
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- am-utils-6.2+rc20110530.orig/debian/patches/kernel-version.patch
+++ am-utils-6.2+rc20110530/debian/patches/kernel-version.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+From: Yoram Bar-Haim 
+Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 13:06:33 + (+0300)
+Subject: fix flaw when kernel version is 3.x
+X-Git-Url: http://git.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/?p=am-utils-6.2.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=3a382320e8d0b52a250efd8907f8429497de2335
+
+fix flaw when kernel version is 3.x
+---
+
+--- a/conf/mount/mount_linux.c
 b/conf/mount/mount_linux.c
+@@ -239,14 +239,20 @@
+ int
+ linux_version_code(void)
+ {
++  char *token;
++  int shift = 16;
+   struct utsname my_utsname;
+   static int release = 0;
+ 
+-  if ( 0 == release && 0 == uname(_utsname)) {
+-release = 65536 * atoi(strtok(my_utsname.release, "."))
+-  + 256 * atoi(strtok(NULL, "."))
+-  + atoi(strtok(NULL, "."));
++  if ( release || uname(_utsname))
++return release;
++
++  for (token = strtok(my_utsname.release, "."); token && (shift > -1); token = strtok(NULL, "."))
++  {
++ release |= (atoi(token) << shift);
++ shift -= 8;
+   }
++
+   return release;
+ }
+ 
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- am-utils-6.2+rc20110530.orig/debian/patches/fix-texi.patch
+++ am-utils-6.2+rc20110530/debian/patches/fix-texi.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+--- a/doc/am-utils.texi
 b/doc/am-utils.texi
+@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
+ Copyright @copyright{} 1989 Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine
+ @*
+ Copyright @copyright{} 1989 The Regents of the University of California.
+-@sp
++@sp 1
+ All Rights Reserved.
+ @vskip 1ex
+ Permission to copy this document, or any portion of it, as
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Dec  6, 2013 at 21:28:34 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> 
> On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 10:22 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> 
> > according to #722145 crashes unless the kernel version has 2 dots.
> > While this is not a problem with the kernel in wheezy, it will prevent
> > using it with newer kernels (backports, custom, vanilla, ...)
> > 
> > I'm not a user of am-utils and don't know how to test this change
> > properly.
> 
> I'd appreciate it if someone could, before we look at including it.
> 
That hasn't happened in the last two years; closing.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#731414: marked as done (pu: NMU proftpd-mod-vroot/0.9.2-2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:59:54 +
with message-id <20160221105954.gq6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#731414: pu: NMU proftpd-mod-vroot/0.9.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #731414,
regarding pu: NMU proftpd-mod-vroot/0.9.2-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
731414: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731414
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

According to #715569 proftpd-mod-vroot needs to be rebuilt to be
functional with the proftpd in wheezy. The 0.9.2-2+b2 binNMU that is to
be found in most architectures in wheezy has been built against
proftpd 1.3.4a-1, while wheezy has 1.3.4a-5+deb7u1 nowadays.
I have no idea what causes this binary incompatibility.

The usual command would probably be 

nmu proftpd-mod-vroot_0.9.2-2 . ALL . wheezy . -m "rebuild against proftpd 
1.3.4a-5+deb7u1"

but there has already been another binNMU in sid, so the next binNMU
version is already taken:

 proftpd-mod-vroot | 0.9.2-2| wheezy | source, armhf
 proftpd-mod-vroot | 0.9.2-2| sid| source
 proftpd-mod-vroot | 0.9.2-2+b1 | wheezy | s390x
 proftpd-mod-vroot | 0.9.2-2+b1 | sid| armhf
 proftpd-mod-vroot | 0.9.2-2+b2 | wheezy | amd64, armel, i386, ia64, 
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
 proftpd-mod-vroot | 0.9.2-2+b2 | sid| s390x
 proftpd-mod-vroot | 0.9.2-2+b3 | sid| amd64, armel, i386, ia64, 
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc


Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Dec  7, 2013 at 13:36:33 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> 
> On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 10:50 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > According to #715569 proftpd-mod-vroot needs to be rebuilt to be
> > functional with the proftpd in wheezy. The 0.9.2-2+b2 binNMU that is to
> > be found in most architectures in wheezy has been built against
> > proftpd 1.3.4a-1, while wheezy has 1.3.4a-5+deb7u1 nowadays.
> > I have no idea what causes this binary incompatibility.
> [...]
> >  proftpd-mod-vroot | 0.9.2-2| wheezy | source, armhf
> >  proftpd-mod-vroot | 0.9.2-2| sid| source
> >  proftpd-mod-vroot | 0.9.2-2+b1 | wheezy | s390x
> >  proftpd-mod-vroot | 0.9.2-2+b1 | sid| armhf
> >  proftpd-mod-vroot | 0.9.2-2+b2 | wheezy | amd64, armel, i386, ia64, 
> > kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
> >  proftpd-mod-vroot | 0.9.2-2+b2 | sid| s390x
> >  proftpd-mod-vroot | 0.9.2-2+b3 | sid| amd64, armel, i386, ia64, 
> > kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc
> 
> Before we consider another rebuild in sid with a higher binNMU number,
> do we know whether the package currently works there?
> 
> Binary incompatibility breaking within uploads of the same upstream
> release a) sucks and b) seems like something that should be expressed in
> package relationships (or better yet, fixed).
> 
No followup in 2+ years; closing.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#785047: vsftpd/3.0.2-17+deb8u1

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Control: reopen -1

On 02/21/2016 11:08 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
>> @Joerg: Could you re-upload the package to mentors?
>> 
> 
> done.. [1]

Reopening since I am preparing the upload now.

Adrian

- -- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=vbBf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#719632: marked as done (pu: package nova/2012.1.1-18)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:56:54 +
with message-id <20160221105654.go6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#719632: Prepared a new Wheezy update for Nova
has caused the Debian Bug report #719632,
regarding pu: package nova/2012.1.1-18
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
719632: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719632
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Dear release team,

Please find attached a serrie of correction I want to add to the current
Nova package. It comes from the output of git format-patch of the wheezy
branch of the Nova package, since the global debdiff for the package was
less readable.

In the 0001-CVE-2013-2096-OSSA-2013-012-Check-QCOW2-image-size-d.patch   
patch, there's normally a quilt refresh output, which I have removed from
attached file so that you can read it better.

Please let me know which of these patches is considered acceptable form
the release team point of view. 

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>From 4f384d61f29b604601bc69f66bfa8b10d440dcac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Goirand 
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 22:37:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] Do not use file from /usr/share/doc/nova-compute-xen in
 postinst (Closes: #710507)

---
 debian/changelog |2 ++
 debian/nova-compute-xen.postinst |2 +-
 debian/rules |2 +-
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 3c5bf44..6e6eaaf 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ nova (2012.1.1-18+deb7u1) wheezy-proposed-updates; urgency=low
   * CVE-2013-2096: [OSSA 2013-012] Check QCOW2 image size during root disk
 creation (Closes: #710157).
   * Refreshes various patches (removes offsets when applying).
+  * Do not use file from /usr/share/doc/nova-compute-xen in postinst, thanks
+to Andreas Beckmann for reporting (Closes: #710507).
 
  -- Thomas Goirand   Sat, 13 Jul 2013 22:26:11 +0800
 
diff --git a/debian/nova-compute-xen.postinst b/debian/nova-compute-xen.postinst
index f74e389..098c2c2 100644
--- a/debian/nova-compute-xen.postinst
+++ b/debian/nova-compute-xen.postinst
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ if [ "$1" = "configure" -o "$1" = "reconfigure" ]; then
 		mkdir /etc/nova
 	fi
 	if ! [ -f ${XENAPI_CONFFILE} ] ; then
-		cp /usr/share/doc/nova-compute-xen/nova-compute.conf.dist ${XENAPI_CONFFILE}
+		cp /usr/share/nova-compute-xen/nova-compute.conf.dist ${XENAPI_CONFFILE}
 	fi
 
 	. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 6c91641..6fc41f1 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ override_dh_install:
 	for hypervisor in qemu kvm uml lxc; do \
 		install -D -m 0600 $(CURDIR)/debian/nova-compute-$${hypervisor}.conf $(CURDIR)/debian/nova-compute-$${hypervisor}/etc/nova/nova-compute.conf; \
 	done
-	install -D -m 0600 $(CURDIR)/debian/nova-compute-xen.conf.dist $(CURDIR)/debian/nova-compute-xen/usr/share/doc/nova-compute-xen/nova-compute.conf.dist
+	install -D -m 0600 $(CURDIR)/debian/nova-compute-xen.conf.dist $(CURDIR)/debian/nova-compute-xen/usr/share/nova-compute-xen/nova-compute.conf.dist
 
 override_dh_fixperms:
 	dh_fixperms -Xnova_sudoers
-- 
1.7.10.4

>From 55f8951757e0923c6919381e280ca4e7a3f7c321 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Goirand 
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2013 23:03:05 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] Fixes log rotation of nova-consoleauth.log and
 nova-xvpvncproxy.log (Closes: #706011)

---
 debian/changelog  |5 +
 debian/nova-console.logrotate |2 +-
 debian/nova-xvpvncproxy.logrotate |4 ++--
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 6c73dd9..a873cb7 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 nova (2012.1.1-18+deb7u1) wheezy-proposed-updates; urgency=low
 
+  [ Thomas Goirand ]
   * CVE-2013-2096: [OSSA 2013-012] Check QCOW2 image size during root disk
 creation (Closes: #710157).
   * Refreshes various patches (removes offsets when applying).
@@ -7,6 +8,10 @@ nova (2012.1.1-18+deb7u1) wheezy-proposed-updates; urgency=low
 to Andreas Beckmann for reporting (Closes: #710507).
   * Updates debian/gbp.conf to use the debian/wheezy branch for building.
 
+  [ Julien Cristau ]
+  * Fixes log rotation of nova-consoleauth.log and nova-xvpvncproxy.log
+(Closes: 

Processed: Re: Bug#785047: vsftpd/3.0.2-17+deb8u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reopen -1
Bug #785047 {Done: Julien Cristau } [release.debian.org] 
jessie-pu: package vsftpd/3.0.2-17
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #785047 to the same values 
previously set

-- 
785047: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785047
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#780533: marked as done (pu: package jakarta-taglibs-standard/1.1.2-2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:50:34 +
with message-id <20160221105034.gm6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#780533: pu: package jakarta-taglibs-standard/1.1.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #780533,
regarding pu: package jakarta-taglibs-standard/1.1.2-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
780533: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=780533
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hi,

This proposed update is to fix CVE-2015-0254 for
jakarta-taglibs-standard in stable.

I'm attaching a .debdiff with the proposed change.

Cheers,


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.8
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.13-0.bpo.1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set 
to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- 
Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org
secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://miguel.cc/key.
"Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche


jakarta-taglibs-standard_1.1.2-2+deb7u1.debdiff.gz
Description: Binary data


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 16:10:20 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> Apologies for the delay in getting back to you.
> 
> On Sun, 2015-03-15 at 16:44 -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> > This proposed update is to fix CVE-2015-0254 for
> > jakarta-taglibs-standard in stable.
> 
> Please go ahead, using "wheezy" in the changelog rather than "stable".
> 
That upload never happened.  Closing.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---

Bug#776617: marked as done (wheezy-pu: fso stack)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:49:21 +
with message-id <20160221104921.gl6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#776617: wheezy-pu: fso stack
has caused the Debian Bug report #776617,
regarding wheezy-pu: fso stack
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
776617: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776617
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hi,

I just requested unblocking of the fso stack for unstable -> testing
migration. I also prepared fixed packages for wheezy and the security
team send me here.

This is the debdiff for the proposed stable updates:

=== debdiff fso-datad_0.11.0-1.dsc fso-datad_0.11.0-1+deb7u1.dsc ===

diff -Nru fso-datad-0.11.0/debian/changelog fso-datad-0.11.0/debian/changelog
--- fso-datad-0.11.0/debian/changelog   2012-05-26 10:29:47.0 +0200
+++ fso-datad-0.11.0/debian/changelog   2015-01-28 00:18:22.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+fso-datad (0.11.0-1+deb7u1) wheezy-security; urgency=high
+
+  * Fix DBus permissions (Closes: CVE-2014-8156)
+
+ -- Sebastian Reichel   Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:04:16 +0100
+
 fso-datad (0.11.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release 
diff -Nru fso-datad-0.11.0/debian/patches/fix-dbus-permissions.patch 
fso-datad-0.11.0/debian/patches/fix-dbus-permissions.patch
--- fso-datad-0.11.0/debian/patches/fix-dbus-permissions.patch  1970-01-01 
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ fso-datad-0.11.0/debian/patches/fix-dbus-permissions.patch  2015-01-28 
00:15:03.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+From: Sebastian Reichel 
+Reported-By: Simon McVittie 
+Last-Update: 2015-01-20
+Description: Fix Security Problem in DBus Configuration
+ Old configuration allows every local user to send arbitrary D-Bus
+ messages to the path /org/freesmartphone/Framework on *any* D-Bus
+ system service (rough HTTP analogy: send a POST to
+ http://server/org/freesmartphone/Framework on any server).
+Bug-CVE: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-8156
+
+Index: fso-datad/data/fsodatad.conf
+===
+--- fso-datad.orig/data/fsodatad.conf
 fso-datad/data/fsodatad.conf
+@@ -3,8 +3,7 @@
+ 
+ 
+ 
+-
+-
++
+ 
+ 
+ 
diff -Nru fso-datad-0.11.0/debian/patches/series 
fso-datad-0.11.0/debian/patches/series
--- fso-datad-0.11.0/debian/patches/series  1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 
+0100
+++ fso-datad-0.11.0/debian/patches/series  2015-01-28 00:15:24.0 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+fix-dbus-permissions.patch

=== debdiff fso-deviced_0.11.4-1.dsc fso-deviced_0.11.4-1+deb7u1.dsc ===

diff -Nru fso-deviced-0.11.4/debian/changelog 
fso-deviced-0.11.4/debian/changelog
--- fso-deviced-0.11.4/debian/changelog 2012-06-01 07:00:15.0 +0200
+++ fso-deviced-0.11.4/debian/changelog 2015-01-28 01:17:12.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+fso-deviced (0.11.4-1+deb7u1) wheezy-security; urgency=high
+
+  * Fix DBus permissions (Closes: CVE-2014-8156)
+
+ -- Sebastian Reichel   Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:40:54 +0100
+
 fso-deviced (0.11.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release
diff -Nru fso-deviced-0.11.4/debian/patches/fix-dbus-permissions.patch 
fso-deviced-0.11.4/debian/patches/fix-dbus-permissions.patch
--- fso-deviced-0.11.4/debian/patches/fix-dbus-permissions.patch
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ fso-deviced-0.11.4/debian/patches/fix-dbus-permissions.patch
2015-01-28 00:40:03.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+From: Sebastian Reichel 
+Reported-By: Simon McVittie 
+Last-Update: 2015-01-20
+Description: Fix Security Problem in DBus Configuration
+ Old configuration allows every local user to send arbitrary D-Bus
+ messages to the path /org/freesmartphone/Framework on *any* D-Bus
+ system service (rough HTTP analogy: send a POST to
+ http://server/org/freesmartphone/Framework on any server).
+Bug-CVE: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-8156
+
+Index: fso-deviced/data/fsodeviced.conf
+===
+--- fso-deviced.orig/data/fsodeviced.conf
 fso-deviced/data/fsodeviced.conf
+@@ -3,8 +3,7 @@
+ 
+ 
+ 
+-
+-
++
+ 
+ 
+ 
diff -Nru fso-deviced-0.11.4/debian/patches/series 

Bug#746946: marked as done (wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:48:19 +
with message-id <20160221104819.gk6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #746946,
regarding wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
746946: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746946
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: wheezy
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hi, can we please update distro-info-data, to add the next Ubuntu
release, 14.10 - Utopic Unicorn.

There are also a couple of minor support date updates, included, trivial
packaging changes, and a bugfix to the Debian release versions. I don't
think that risks regressions.

As in the past, e.g. #727020, I'd be nice if this could go through
stable-updates, but not essential.

The impact of having this data package out of date is mostly restricted
to ubuntu-dev-tools, which won't know the name of the current Ubuntu
development release.

Thanks,

SR

diff -Nru distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian/changelog 
distro-info-data-0.20~deb7u1/debian/changelog
--- distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian/changelog   2013-10-21 
17:13:46.0 +0200
+++ distro-info-data-0.20~deb7u1/debian/changelog   2014-05-04 
10:58:03.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+distro-info-data (0.20~deb7u1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  [ Benjamin Drung ]
+  * Update EOL date of Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" to 2014-05-16.
+  * Update EOL date of Ubuntu 13.04 "Raring Ringtai" to 2014-01-27.
+  * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.5.
+  * Use just the stable release version without the point release suffix,
+i.e. 6.0 for squeeze, 7 for wheezy, and 8 for jessie. (Closes: #724557)
+
+  [ Stefano Rivera ]
+  * Add Ubuntu 14.10, Utopic Unicorn.
+
+ -- Stefano Rivera   Sun, 04 May 2014 10:57:29 +0200
+
 distro-info-data (0.17~deb7u1) stable; urgency=low
 
   * Add Ubuntu 14.04, Trusty Tahr. (Closes: #726696, 727020)
diff -Nru distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian/compat 
distro-info-data-0.20~deb7u1/debian/compat
--- distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian/compat  2013-05-11 01:08:18.0 
+0200
+++ distro-info-data-0.20~deb7u1/debian/compat  2013-03-20 00:11:08.0 
+0200
@@ -1 +1 @@
-8
+9
diff -Nru distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian/control 
distro-info-data-0.20~deb7u1/debian/control
--- distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian/control 2013-05-11 01:08:18.0 
+0200
+++ distro-info-data-0.20~deb7u1/debian/control 2014-01-07 23:18:24.0 
+0200
@@ -3,10 +3,10 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Benjamin Drung 
 Uploaders: Stefano Rivera 
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8), python
-Standards-Version: 3.9.3
-Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/distro-info-data.git
-Vcs-Browser: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/distro-info-data.git
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), python
+Standards-Version: 3.9.5
+Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/distro-info-data.git
+Vcs-Browser: 
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/distro-info-data.git
 
 Package: distro-info-data
 Architecture: all
diff -Nru distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian/copyright 
distro-info-data-0.20~deb7u1/debian/copyright
--- distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian/copyright   2013-05-11 
01:08:18.0 +0200
+++ distro-info-data-0.20~deb7u1/debian/copyright   2013-03-20 
00:11:10.0 +0200
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 Upstream-Contact: Benjamin Drung 
 
 Files: *
-Copyright: 2009-2012, Benjamin Drung 
+Copyright: 2009-2013, Benjamin Drung 
 License: ISC
  Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any
  purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
diff -Nru distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian.csv 
distro-info-data-0.20~deb7u1/debian.csv
--- distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian.csv 2013-10-21 16:58:51.0 
+0200
+++ distro-info-data-0.20~deb7u1/debian.csv 2014-01-07 23:19:29.0 
+0200
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 4.0,Etch,etch,2005-06-06,2007-04-08,2010-02-15
 5.0,Lenny,lenny,2007-04-08,2009-02-14,2012-02-06
 6.0,Squeeze,squeeze,2009-02-14,2011-02-06,2014-05-04
-7.0,Wheezy,wheezy,2011-02-06,2013-05-04
-8.0,Jessie,jessie,2013-05-04
+7,Wheezy,wheezy,2011-02-06,2013-05-04
+8,Jessie,jessie,2013-05-04
 ,Sid,sid,1993-08-16
 ,Experimental,experimental,1993-08-16
diff -Nru 

Bug#731735: marked as done (pu: package glance/2012.1.1-5+deb7u1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:47:03 +
with message-id <20160221104703.gj6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#731735: pu: package glance/2012.1.1-5+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #731735,
regarding pu: package glance/2012.1.1-5+deb7u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
731735: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731735
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hi,

I have prepared an update for Glance over here:
http://archive.gplhost.com/pub/security/glance/

Attached to this mail is the relevant debdiff for Glance.
What the update does is only fixing the logrotate path,
which is currently wrong in the current Wheezy version.
Here's the changelog:

[ Thomas Goirand ]
* debian/gbp.conf now tracking the debian/wheezy branch.
[ Julien Cristau ]
* Fix logrotate config to reference the right file names.

Thanks considering this and letting me know,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)
diff -Nru glance-2012.1.1/debian/changelog glance-2012.1.1/debian/changelog
--- glance-2012.1.1/debian/changelog	2013-03-14 20:53:41.0 +
+++ glance-2012.1.1/debian/changelog	2013-12-09 07:48:43.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+glance (2012.1.1-5+deb7u1) wheezy-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+  [ Thomas Goirand ]
+  * debian/gbp.conf now tracking the debian/wheezy branch.
+
+  [ Julien Cristau ]
+  * Fix logrotate config to reference the right file names.
+
+ -- Thomas Goirand   Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:44:43 +0800
+
 glance (2012.1.1-5) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * CVE-2013-1840: fixes "Backend credentials leak in Glance v1 API"
diff -Nru glance-2012.1.1/debian/gbp.conf glance-2012.1.1/debian/gbp.conf
--- glance-2012.1.1/debian/gbp.conf	2013-03-14 20:53:41.0 +
+++ glance-2012.1.1/debian/gbp.conf	2013-12-09 07:48:43.0 +
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 [DEFAULT]
 upstream-branch = master
-debian-branch = debian/unstable
+debian-branch = debian/wheezy
 upstream-tag = %(version)s
 compression = xz
 
diff -Nru glance-2012.1.1/debian/glance-api.logrotate glance-2012.1.1/debian/glance-api.logrotate
--- glance-2012.1.1/debian/glance-api.logrotate	2013-03-14 20:53:41.0 +
+++ glance-2012.1.1/debian/glance-api.logrotate	2013-12-09 07:48:43.0 +
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/var/log/glance/glance-api.log {
+/var/log/glance/api.log {
 daily
 missingok
 compress
diff -Nru glance-2012.1.1/debian/glance-registry.logrotate glance-2012.1.1/debian/glance-registry.logrotate
--- glance-2012.1.1/debian/glance-registry.logrotate	2013-03-14 20:53:41.0 +
+++ glance-2012.1.1/debian/glance-registry.logrotate	2013-12-09 07:48:43.0 +
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/var/log/glance/glance-registry.log {
+/var/log/glance/registry.log {
 daily
 missingok
 compress
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:47:40 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> On 2014-08-24 19:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >On 2014-01-22 21:37, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 18:12 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>  I have prepared an update for Glance over here:
>  http://archive.gplhost.com/pub/security/glance/
> >>>
> >>>The security tracker lists this issue as potentially open in
> >>>Wheezy: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2013-4354
> >>>
> >>>Does this affect stable and is there a fix which can be included
> >>>along?
> >>
> >>Ping? (On both the original upload and Moritz's question.)
> >
> >Re-ping.
> 
> Re-re-ping.
> 
> If nothing happens with this soon then I'm tempted to close the request,
> rather than leaving it open indefinitely.
> 
That was over a year ago; closing.

Cheers,
Julien--- End Message ---

Bug#726558: marked as done (pu: package policykit-1/0.105-3+deb7u1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:46:24 +
with message-id <20160221104624.gi6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#726558: pu: package policykit-1/0.105-3+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #726558,
regarding pu: package policykit-1/0.105-3+deb7u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
726558: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726558
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

As discussed in [1], I'd like to upload a fix for CVE-2013-4288 for
policykit-1 to stable.
The patch itself has been applied to the unstable version as well (in
0.105-3+nmu1).

Please let me know if I can proceed with the stable upload to get this
fix into 7.3.

Full debdiff is attached.

Regards,
Michael


[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2013/10/msg00604.html

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.10-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index c3ab45b..1644c95 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+policykit-1 (0.105-3+deb7u1) stable; urgency=low
+
+  * Fix CVE-2013-4288: race condition in pkcheck. (Closes: #723717)
+
+ -- Michael Biebl   Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:35:01 +0200
+
 policykit-1 (0.105-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * 07_set-XAUTHORITY-environment-variable-if-unset.patch: Set XAUTHORITY
diff --git a/debian/gbp.conf b/debian/gbp.conf
index c31be83..a475fbf 100644
--- a/debian/gbp.conf
+++ b/debian/gbp.conf
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 [DEFAULT]
 pristine-tar = True
-debian-branch = master
+debian-branch = wheezy
diff --git a/debian/patches/cve-2013-4288.patch b/debian/patches/cve-2013-4288.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..2aad36c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/cve-2013-4288.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+From 52c927893a2ab135462b616c2e00fec377da9885 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Colin Walters 
+Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:16:11 -0400
+Subject: [PATCH 2/4] pkcheck: Support --process=pid,start-time,uid syntax too
+
+The uid is a new addition; this allows callers such as libvirt to
+close a race condition in reading the uid of the process talking to
+them.  They can read it via getsockopt(SO_PEERCRED) or equivalent,
+rather than having pkcheck look at /proc later after the fact.
+
+Programs which invoke pkcheck but need to know beforehand (i.e.  at
+compile time) whether or not it supports passing the uid can
+use:
+
+pkcheck_supports_uid=$($PKG_CONFIG --variable pkcheck_supports_uid polkit-gobject-1)
+test x$pkcheck_supports_uid = xyes
+---
+ data/polkit-gobject-1.pc.in |3 +++
+ docs/man/pkcheck.xml|   29 -
+ src/programs/pkcheck.c  |9 +++--
+ 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
+
+Index: policykit-1-0.105/data/polkit-gobject-1.pc.in
+===
+--- policykit-1-0.105.orig/data/polkit-gobject-1.pc.in	2013-09-11 09:40:56.604225567 -0400
 policykit-1-0.105/data/polkit-gobject-1.pc.in	2013-09-11 09:40:56.596225567 -0400
+@@ -11,3 +11,6 @@
+ Libs: -L${libdir} -lpolkit-gobject-1
+ Cflags: -I${includedir}/polkit-1
+ Requires: gio-2.0 >= 2.18 glib-2.0 >= 2.18
++# Programs using pkcheck can use this to determine
++# whether or not it can be passed a uid.
++pkcheck_supports_uid=true
+Index: policykit-1-0.105/docs/man/pkcheck.xml
+===
+--- policykit-1-0.105.orig/docs/man/pkcheck.xml	2013-09-11 09:40:56.604225567 -0400
 policykit-1-0.105/docs/man/pkcheck.xml	2013-09-11 09:42:28.272223569 -0400
+@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@
+ 
+   pid,pid-start-time
+ 
++
++  pid,pid-start-time,uid
++
+   
+ 
+ 
+@@ -90,7 +93,7 @@
+ DESCRIPTION
+ 
+   pkcheck is used to check whether a process, specified by
+-  either --process or --system-bus-name,
++  either --process (see below) or --system-bus-name,
+   is authorized for action. The --detail
+   option can be used zero or more times to pass details about action.
+   If --allow-user-interaction is passed, pkcheck blocks
+@@ -160,17 +163,25 @@
+   
+ 

Bug#725142: marked as done (pu: package totem-plugin-arte/3.1.2-1+deb7u1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:44:14 +
with message-id <20160221104414.gh6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#725142: pu: package totem-plugin-arte/3.2.1-1~wheezy1
has caused the Debian Bug report #725142,
regarding pu: package totem-plugin-arte/3.1.2-1+deb7u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
725142: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725142
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu


The current totem-plugin-arte package in Wheezy is unusable because of a 
changes on Arte's website.

My package is on mentors.debian.net:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/totem-plugin-arte

The version I'm proposing is directly based on the latest upstream release, 
which fix this problem and some other (small) issues.
Backporting the relevant commits as patches to the current wheezy version would 
bring most of the code from the new upstream version, so I thought adding a 
small patch to make the new version build with the old Totem from Wheezy was 
the right thing to do.


Here is the upstream changelog since 3.1.2 (the current Wheezy version), with 
some annotations.

-

2013 September 22th - Totem Arte Plugin 3.2.1

Changes since 3.2.0:
 * Fixed the extraction of https video links
 * Fixed preferences mnemonics in English

2013 September 10th - Totem Arte Plugin 3.2.0

Changes since 3.1.3:
 * Fix stream extraction from the new Arte website
 * Reimplementation of the removed Totem.CellRenderVideo -> could be reverted
 * New and more efficient primary video feed source (JSON) -> Now required
 * Support for low quality streams -> could be reverted
 * Minor bug fixes and translation updates

2012 December 9th - Totem Arte Plugin 3.1.3

Changes since 3.1.2:
 * Fix compilation with Vala 0.18 and Totem 3.6.0 -> REVERTED, see 
debian/patches

-

The new package also includes the harden binary that is already in experimental 
and Ubuntu since many months.


Here is the proposed debian/changelog:

totem-plugin-arte (3.2.1-1~wheezy1) stable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release
  * Add a patch to build against Totem 3.0 (revert an upstream commit)
  * Harden the binary, fix 2 lintian warnings
  * Bump Debian Policy to 3.9.4 (no change needed)

 -- Nicolas Delvaux   Wed, 02 Oct 2013 00:20:15 
+0200




Totem-plugin-arte is a leaf package and the current Wheezy version is unusable.
IMHO, this looks like a very low risk upgrade.


Regards,
Nicolas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 15:51:12 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 21:15 +0200, Nicolas Delvaux wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > A year later, the package is still broken in Stable.
> > 
> > Here is, yet again, a new debdiff.
> > Compared to the previous one, I edited a regex in order to be
> > compatible with a change that recently happened on the Arte Website.
> 
> Apologies for the delays. If this something you're still interested in
> fixing in wheezy, then please feel free to upload (with "wheezy" in the
> changelog rather than "stable").
> 
Apparently not; closing.

Cheers,
Julien--- End Message ---

Bug#699806: marked as done (pu: dlocate/1.02+deb7u1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:43:39 +
with message-id <20160221104339.gg6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3
has caused the Debian Bug report #699806,
regarding pu: dlocate/1.02+deb7u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
699806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699806
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package dlocate

dlocate has been neglected for quite some time now. I have collected
some patches to fix several minor but annoying bugs in the bugtracker
and fixed the manpages. I understand that these changes are not relevant
for security-related issues and I naturally accept if my unblock request
gets rejected. However, I think all these changes are nice to have and
bring the package into a much better shape for shipping with Wheezy.

I am attaching the debdiff between the version in testing and unstable.

Cheers,

Adrian

unblock dlocate/1.02+nmu3

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.7-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru dlocate-1.02/debian/changelog dlocate-1.02+nmu3/debian/changelog
--- dlocate-1.02/debian/changelog	2009-06-03 03:24:04.0 +0200
+++ dlocate-1.02+nmu3/debian/changelog	2012-12-29 14:34:22.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,28 @@
+dlocate (1.02+nmu3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix handling of multiple arguments for several commands (Closes: #563881).
+  * Fix dlocate return codes for several commands on exit (Closes: #564293).
+
+ -- John Paul Adrian Glaubitz   Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:32:54 +0100
+
+dlocate (1.02+nmu2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Add missing "--" when invoking grep command (Closes: #587179).
+  * Fix bash completion for package names in dlocate (Closes: # 658669).
+  * Fix incorrect exit code 0 on failed search (Closes: #689647).
+  * Fix parameter passing to dlocate_option_error() in dlocate (Closes: # 690758).
+
+ -- John Paul Adrian Glaubitz   Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:42:16 +0100
+
+dlocate (1.02+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix several mistakes in manpages (Closes: #586483, #692896, #696479).
+
+ -- John Paul Adrian Glaubitz   Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:47:08 +0100
+
 dlocate (1.02) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * fixed example in dlocate.1 man page again (Closes: #42)
diff -Nru dlocate-1.02/dlocate dlocate-1.02+nmu3/dlocate
--- dlocate-1.02/dlocate	2009-06-03 03:28:53.0 +0200
+++ dlocate-1.02+nmu3/dlocate	2012-12-29 14:30:19.0 +0100
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@
 ;;
 
 (-*)
-dlocate_option_error $1
+dlocate_option_error $p
 ;;
 
 (*)
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@
 FILES_REGEXP="($PKGS_REGEXP)"
 [ "$WORD_RE" = "-w" ] && FILES_REGEXP="\b$FILES_REGEXP\b"
 
-PKGS=$(echo "$PKGS" | sed -e "s/$SEPARATOR/ /")
+PKGS=$(echo "$PKGS" | sed -e "s/$SEPARATOR/ /g")
 
 if [ "$VERBOSE" = "1" ] ; then
 echo "PKGS:" $PKGS
@@ -277,15 +277,15 @@
 PREFIX="^([-a-zA-Z0-9_.+]+:|diversion by )"
 [ "$RE_TYPE" = "-G" ] && PREFIX="^([-a-zA-Z0-9_.+]+:\|diversion by )"
 
-[ "$VERBOSE" = "1" ] && echo RUNNING: $GREP $RE_TYPE $IGNORE_CASE "$PREFIX.*$FILES_REGEXP" "$DLOCATEDB"
-$GREP $RE_TYPE $IGNORE_CASE "$PREFIX.*$FILES_REGEXP" "$DLOCATEDB" | output_filter
-result=$?
+[ "$VERBOSE" = "1" ] && echo RUNNING: $GREP $RE_TYPE $IGNORE_CASE -- "$PREFIX.*$FILES_REGEXP" "$DLOCATEDB"
+$GREP $RE_TYPE $IGNORE_CASE -- "$PREFIX.*$FILES_REGEXP" "$DLOCATEDB" | output_filter
+result=${PIPESTATUS[0]}
 
 elif [ "$OPTION" = 'DEFAULT' ] ; then
 
-[ "$VERBOSE" = "1" ] && echo RUNNING: $GREP $RE_TYPE $IGNORE_CASE $WORD_RE "$PKGS_REGEXP" "$DLOCATEDB"
-$GREP $RE_TYPE $IGNORE_CASE $WORD_RE "$PKGS_REGEXP" "$DLOCATEDB" | output_filter
-result=$?
+[ "$VERBOSE" = "1" ] && echo RUNNING: $GREP $RE_TYPE $IGNORE_CASE -- $WORD_RE "$PKGS_REGEXP" "$DLOCATEDB"
+$GREP $RE_TYPE $IGNORE_CASE -- $WORD_RE "$PKGS_REGEXP" "$DLOCATEDB" | output_filter
+result=${PIPESTATUS[0]}
 
 elif [ "$OPTION" = '-s' ] 

Bug#814651: jessie-pu: package sitesummary/0.1.17+deb8u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 16:27 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Adam D. Barratt]
> > The comment for the prerm is wrong (twice) - it's disabling, not
> > enabling, the configuration and not checking for cgi.load.
> 
> Right.  It was wrong in the master branch and unstable too.  I've fixed
> the master branch, and will upload the fix later.

Thanks.

> > Other than that, please go ahead.
> 
> The fix for jessie is uploaded, and the changes available in the jessie
> branch in
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-edu/upstream/sitesummary.git >.

Flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#814651: jessie-pu: package sitesummary/0.1.17+deb8u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #814651 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package sitesummary/0.1.17+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
814651: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814651
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#814266: jessie-pu: package pagekite/0.5.6d-3+deb8u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 15:01 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Adam D. Barratt]
> > Please go ahead.
> 
> Thank you.  Uploaded, and a new branch jessie-update contain the
> changes on
> https://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/pagekite.git >.

Flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#814266: jessie-pu: package pagekite/0.5.6d-3+deb8u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #814266 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package pagekite/0.5.6d-3+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
814266: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814266
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#797192: marked as done (jessie-pu: package nova/2014.1.3-11 (CVE-2015-3241, #796109))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:36:56 +
with message-id <20160221103656.gf6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#797192: Hang on
has caused the Debian Bug report #797192,
regarding jessie-pu: package nova/2014.1.3-11 (CVE-2015-3241, #796109)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
797192: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797192
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hi,

I've prepared an update of nova for Jessie which fixes CVE-2015-3241.
This CVE is about DoS nova-compute machines by resizing and immediately
after it delete the VM, which makes nova-compute consume all CPU.

The package is available here:
http://sid.gplhost.com/jessie-proposed-updates/nova/

Please allow me to upload it to jessie-p-u.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)

P.S: As we speak, I'm preparing the update for Sid, it should be
ready soonish today, and it will include the point release update.
diff -Nru nova-2014.1.3/debian/changelog nova-2014.1.3/debian/changelog
--- nova-2014.1.3/debian/changelog	2015-03-11 08:48:55.0 +
+++ nova-2014.1.3/debian/changelog	2015-08-28 09:24:00.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+nova (2014.1.3-11+deb8u1) jessie-proposed-updates; urgency=medium
+
+  * CVE-2015-3241: Resize/delete combo allows to overload nova-compute. Applied
+upstream patch (Closes: #796109).
+
+ -- Thomas Goirand   Fri, 28 Aug 2015 11:10:06 +0200
+
 nova (2014.1.3-11) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * CVE-2015-0259: Websocket Hijacking Vulnerability in Nova VNC Server. Done
diff -Nru nova-2014.1.3/debian/patches/CVE-2015-3241_Resize_delete_combo_allow_to_overload_nova-compute.patch nova-2014.1.3/debian/patches/CVE-2015-3241_Resize_delete_combo_allow_to_overload_nova-compute.patch
--- nova-2014.1.3/debian/patches/CVE-2015-3241_Resize_delete_combo_allow_to_overload_nova-compute.patch	1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 +
+++ nova-2014.1.3/debian/patches/CVE-2015-3241_Resize_delete_combo_allow_to_overload_nova-compute.patch	2015-08-28 09:24:00.0 +
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+Description: CVE-2015-3241: Sync process utils from oslo for execute callbacks
+ The sync pulls in the following changes:
+ .
+  Ifc23325 Add 2 callbacks to processutils.execute()
+  I22b2d7b processutils: ensure on_completion callback is always called
+  I59d5799 Let oslotest manage the six.move setting for mox
+  I245750f Remove `processutils` dependency on `log`
+  Ia5bb418 Fix exception message in openstack.common.processutils.execute
+Author: Abhishek Kekane 
+Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/796109
+Origin: upstream, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/208876/
+Bug-Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/bugs/1387543
+Last-Update: 2015-08-28
+
+--- nova-2014.1.3.orig/nova/openstack/common/processutils.py
 nova-2014.1.3/nova/openstack/common/processutils.py
+@@ -112,6 +112,17 @@ def execute(*cmd, **kwargs):
+ :type shell:boolean
+ :param loglevel:log level for execute commands.
+ :type loglevel: int.  (Should be logging.DEBUG or logging.INFO)
++:param on_execute:  This function will be called upon process creation
++with the object as a argument.  The Purpose of this
++is to allow the caller of `processutils.execute` to
++track process creation asynchronously.
++:type on_execute:   function(:class:`subprocess.Popen`)
++:param on_completion:   This function will be called upon process
++completion with the object as a argument.  The
++Purpose of this is to allow the caller of
++`processutils.execute` to track process completion
++asynchronously.
++:type on_completion:function(:class:`subprocess.Popen`)
+ :returns:   (stdout, stderr) from process execution
+ :raises::class:`UnknownArgumentError` on
+ receiving unknown arguments
+@@ -127,6 +138,8 @@ def execute(*cmd, **kwargs):
+ root_helper = kwargs.pop('root_helper', '')
+ shell = kwargs.pop('shell', False)
+ loglevel = kwargs.pop('loglevel', logging.DEBUG)
++on_execute = kwargs.pop('on_execute', None)
++on_completion = kwargs.pop('on_completion', None)
+ 
+ if isinstance(check_exit_code, bool):
+ ignore_exit_code = 

Processed: Re: Bug#815356: jessie-pu: package ruby-standalone/0.5+deb8u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #815356 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package ruby-standalone/0.5+deb8u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
815356: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815356
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#815356: jessie-pu: package ruby-standalone/0.5+deb8u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + confirmed

On Sat, 2016-02-20 at 22:05 -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> I would like to upload a stable update for ruby-standalone, that makes
> it work correctly with bundler, which is a very important use case.

Please go ahead.

Regards,

Adam

Bug#793117: marked as done (jessie-pu: package python-memcache/1.53+2014.06.08.git.918e88c496-1+deb8u1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:33:22 +
with message-id <20160221103322.gd6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#793117: jessie-pu: package 
python-memcache/1.53+2014.06.08.git.918e88c496-1+deb8u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #793117,
regarding jessie-pu: package 
python-memcache/1.53+2014.06.08.git.918e88c496-1+deb8u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
793117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793117
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hi,

I would like to propose a stable upload for python-memcache. 

python-memcache's version currently in stable (1.53+2014.06.08.git.918e88c496-1)
is building python3-memcache though its code isn't fully python3
compatible. This python3 package is unusuable and shouldn't exist[0].

The upstream code have been ported to python3 in sid, but this fix 
shouldn't probably be backported since it would require an upstream code 
upgrade from 1.53 to 1.54 in Jessie.

The easiest solution is to make python-memcache stops building
python3-memcache in Jessie. This can be done with the attached fix.

The diff against 1.53+2014.06.08.git.918e88c496-1+deb8u1 is attached.

Best Regards,
 Hugo

[0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788561

-- 
  Hugo Lefeuvre (hugo6390)|www.hugo6390.org
4096/ ACB7 B67F 197F 9B32 1533 431C AC90 AC3E C524 065E
--- a/debian/changelog	2015-07-13 11:00:34.426439594 +0200
+++ b/debian/changelog	2015-07-13 11:00:49.106419709 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+python-memcache (1.53+2014.06.08.git.918e88c496-1+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium
+
+  * Team upload.
+  * debian/control, debian/rules:
+   - Don't build python3-memcache anymore, upstream's Python3 support
+ is too incomplete (Closes: #788561).
+
+ -- Hugo Lefeuvre   Sun, 12 Jul 2015 22:22:34 +0200
+
 python-memcache (1.53+2014.06.08.git.918e88c496-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream release.
--- a/debian/control	2015-07-13 11:00:34.426439594 +0200
+++ b/debian/control	2015-07-13 11:00:34.422439599 +0200
@@ -5,9 +5,7 @@
 Uploaders: Carl Chenet , Thomas Goirand 
 Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9),
python-all (>= 2.6.6-3),
-   python-setuptools,
-   python3-all,
-   python3-setuptools
+   python-setuptools
 Standards-Version: 3.9.5
 Homepage: http://www.tummy.com/Community/software/python-memcached/
 Vcs-Svn: svn://anonscm.debian.org/python-modules/packages/python-memcache/trunk/
@@ -23,14 +21,3 @@
  one or more, possibly remote, memcached servers.
  .
  This package contains the Python 2.x module.
-
-Package: python3-memcache
-Architecture: all
-Depends: python3-six, ${misc:Depends}, ${python3:Depends}
-Suggests: memcached
-Description: pure python memcached client - Python 3.x
- This software is a 100% Python interface to the memcached memory cache daemon.
- It is the client side software which allows storing values in one or more,
- possibly remote, memcached servers.
- .
- This package contains the Python 3.x module.
--- a/debian/rules	2015-07-13 11:00:34.426439594 +0200
+++ b/debian/rules	2015-07-13 11:00:34.422439599 +0200
@@ -1,22 +1,17 @@
 #!/usr/bin/make -f
 
 PYTHONS:=$(shell pyversions -vr)
-PYTHON3S:=$(shell py3versions -vr)
 
 UPSTREAM_GIT = git://github.com/linsomniac/python-memcached.git
 
 %:
-	dh $@ --buildsystem=python_distutils --with python2,python3
+	dh $@ --buildsystem=python_distutils --with python2
 
 override_dh_install:
 	set -e && for pyvers in $(PYTHONS); do \
 		python$$pyvers setup.py install --install-layout=deb \
 			--root $(CURDIR)/debian/python-memcache; \
 	done
-	set -e && for pyvers in $(PYTHON3S); do \
-		python$$pyvers setup.py install --install-layout=deb \
-			--root $(CURDIR)/debian/python3-memcache; \
-	done
 
 override_dh_clean:
 	dh_clean -O--buildsystem=python_distutils
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 17:34:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> 
> On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 15:04 +0200, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote:
> > python-memcache's version currently in stable 
> > (1.53+2014.06.08.git.918e88c496-1)
> > is building python3-memcache though its code isn't fully python3
> > compatible. This python3 package is unusuable and shouldn't exist[0].
> > 
> > The upstream code have been ported to python3 in sid, but this fix 
> > shouldn't probably be backported since 

Bug#796593: marked as done (pu: package emdebian-archive-keyring/2.0.4)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:34:21 +
with message-id <20160221103421.ge6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#796593: pu: package emdebian-archive-keyring/2.0.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #796593,
regarding pu: package emdebian-archive-keyring/2.0.4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
796593: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796593
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

The emdebian-archive-keyring package in jessie contains the old key
which was revoked when the emdebian server was compromised in November
2014.

A new server has since been set up and a new key used for the
cross-toolchain/cross-building archive which is still hosted
there. This is the recommended way to get cross-toolchains installed
for jessie (for pre-built architectures): 
https://wiki.debian.org/CrossToolchains#For_jessie_.28Debian_8.29

This is made much harder than it should be because manual key
downloading and checking is needed due to this package (version 2.0.4)
being essentially useless in jessie.

The 2.0.5 version in testing really should be in jessie too so that
people would have a convenient authenticated route to using the jessie
cross-toolchains archive.

AIUI I do not need to do a new upload if the package containing just
the necesary fix is already in unstable/testing. That is the case here.

Attached is the diff for 2.0.4 -> 2.0.5

(Note: I will be offline until 5th Sept - not sure what the schedule
for the next stable release is)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.8
  APT prefers oldstable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru emdebian-archive-keyring-2.0.4/0x97BB3B58.txt emdebian-archive-keyring-2.0.5/0x97BB3B58.txt
--- emdebian-archive-keyring-2.0.4/0x97BB3B58.txt	2014-11-27 09:26:06.0 +
+++ emdebian-archive-keyring-2.0.5/0x97BB3B58.txt	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
--BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
-Version: GnuPG v1
-
-mQGiBEY1QygRBACUM8ypZIqJu1O/jjmZJ2XmVHPUMygzcAOXfOsfLBaIz5UmYOCc
-22iFN5Milj4hEpgrVnyGgXZh1vA2xbxGZNdjMfge7z0Bvf93RM6gzVnU4EXWu4sW
-4nfyPH28/ChsA89mXFnS99zqsRfZNYjQdRCH4LByP7AnXojKU3gq1b4ydwCgzzBV
-izehffV2lW7LDv9NhMePhzMD/0mrIUPfCvp0wKXRSHuYaLZiuoI6gV4HrAxLqeo9
-+GXfBb6n6Fpl52fRGbBAtatZ9wDVJi8v7kFQTvX3vcYGYVKmjJBT2aOx7ZhYNXV2
-lncL6e8+b8gG8f+asV2JbdpZCR4KiDyko6VCWZswqpKytrgK+hK+ECS5Mre1Oy+Z
-RuaFBACJcxP4h4M0J1vY0wzlXUw81u+BNJkGanW57JIsP/mwvR4MqLfyi7tAmuPX
-L6/aWsLvLGYZlFJynZ+1mXXoRUevCGcEc9gK/dpTKVYLRsS0TtNXwaY4hwF7QpBb
-gh6Bx/TDBHYjADaYu2EZcwFI29kgwAfwAfyabB/hCfKHT12D5ohJBCARCgAJBQJU
-cueVAh0CAAoJELW3cgCXuztYfq0An07hWjCfb5DuCbWVYyF1Q/j56gBmAJ9x33CB
-dPq3IxPOiL3MdLh8tv1H07QcRW1kZWJpYW4gQXJjaGl2ZSBTaWduaW5nIEtleYhg
-BBMRAgAgBQJGNUMoAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtbdyAJe7
-O1gTpgCgv5hYIBB7STKXAzNkQzhDzvMrJM4AoMABwK3Q948TDKFKIWu2yDJ9KAjB
-iEUEEBECAAYFAkY3M/4ACgkQIWclcBdP7jX7HwCcDWmGKUTkRA+GA3d81BW7lwRz
-SPgAmL2SVYU8VK+TpwLzUbWn2EGkBUWIRgQQEQIABgUCRjZfwwAKCRCIAQlKKLyz
-45evAJ4qfetNIo1MWcqM8rA6OyN0vkFV/ACg8/5CZw4oLOHuq4+WIbbpHDiV37SI
-RgQQEQIABgUCRjZf2QAKCRCTsNWvqJf9AsixAJ9e3zbMLmBxi0dZng3MmiBF0ex6
-qgCcDWGwW16fPG+XN28ewH8k+WSoS0u5Ag0ERjVDKhAIAMPHsF7MCR/bgzmznXVX
-V1QuIDHR9NTAGqFiaGMBKK26rHSN8Wds3zPWR/MBvkCknn9MwW2a4B7Vrdz9RAg3
-cUYmSYbHBNDtCTV8b14fNAoc3nsjblgZ+/+0zDvR9ZNv3cUBaCqJ1hlZqZbOWi1X
-PTv2r2CRe2A6q9oGj54NmpSIO7EcH2yYcx0GTafY4ZDqZha3kmzLSq1gh2s5kph9
-NyB2pBu31pY3PDPKkxE6+ZAWb6oHZUaKOtr4aXnqLxYzSi6Wv3kS5xXS+ZbCv5lz
-/KlTTIlLRm86wvwRnqGqjBGH4knyB+VKtxlR/T+aRQxCMSIICYzpfvM+O8a+hH9Z
-+zMAAwYIAMFAqo9dmRfc7BPLhRxb9erSaEhxb05lwiDyzPP6B5hcK8t8S/L4k9Hw
-OXoYfnR7/GqUjSj4dYZ5uLlTLOASMpv+5Yq4EmPhuqKWM7MAK0uQXVsxSktswNHE
-Hb5c3H8VfQJvpUdelnJdSfqttKvz9Cm1rtPRKylIK/naQJlZ5XxuAcV+PDcWOHq6
-B2uV2aG5CGT2yVM9VjxIkMLBPGXxPjPIKKZky1TTdOdQdGvSyNOu4gd0o+4i07IZ
-SXBsHarFPTKGoAZ+YsKRJ3ODAKeKnYXIQQf/OmmHdkKOfRkVDogZyKHVhSNVEOZ4
-NyZwbjXc8FtKGOUYvXcpjuxqzqRckteISQQYEQIACQUCRjVDKgIbDAAKCRC1t3IA
-l7s7WNO0AJ0aws9mKLgL0CQKvAKs5UBmpgATXQCfdqJCUVSEsRcihgP8VfOpPeXm
-0Vs=
-=aGyf
--END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
diff -Nru emdebian-archive-keyring-2.0.4/1804772E.txt emdebian-archive-keyring-2.0.5/1804772E.txt
--- emdebian-archive-keyring-2.0.4/1804772E.txt	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ emdebian-archive-keyring-2.0.5/1804772E.txt	2015-07-15 17:51:31.0 

Bug#815400: transition: ros-ros-comm

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 21/02/16 10:09, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Hi,
> 
> we want to transition librosconsole to link against log4cxx instead of an
> internal print version. librosconsole exports these symbols, so other packages
> depend on the choice and we can't simply switch it. We went for a Soname bump
> because it's Debian internal anyhow, as upstream declined to add one.
> 
> The new version of ros-ros-comm is in experimental already.
> 
> Ben file:
> 
> title = "ros-ros-comm";
> is_affected = .depends ~ "librosconsole0d" | .depends ~ "librosconsole1d";
> is_good = .depends ~ "librosconsole1d";
> is_bad = .depends ~ "librosconsole0d";
> 
> We are maintainer of all reverse dependencies and we did test rebuilds already
> and have all needed patches prepared. All rdepends are listed here:
> 
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ros-ros-comm.html

Go ahead.

Cheers,
Emilio

Processed: Re: Bug#815400: transition: ros-ros-comm

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #815400 [release.debian.org] transition: ros-ros-comm
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
815400: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815400
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#792550: marked as done (jessie-pu: package ldap2zone/0.2-5+deb8u1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:31:28 +
with message-id <20160221103128.gc6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#792550: jessie-pu: package ldap2zone/0.2-5+deb8u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #792550,
regarding jessie-pu: package ldap2zone/0.2-5+deb8u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
792550: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792550
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Please consider accepting the following jessie-pu for package ldap2zone.

  * debian/patches:
+ Add 0009_support-ldapi-uris.patch. Accept ldapi:/// style URIs. (Closes:
  #792120).

This allows people to use ldapi:// style URIs with ldap2zone.

Accepting this change in jessie will be highly welcome and is relevant
for the Debian Edu development.

light+love
Mike

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.1
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 
'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
diff -Nru ldap2zone-0.2/debian/changelog ldap2zone-0.2/debian/changelog
--- ldap2zone-0.2/debian/changelog	2015-07-16 08:58:42.0 +0200
+++ ldap2zone-0.2/debian/changelog	2015-07-16 09:03:41.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+ldap2zone (0.2-5+deb8u1) jessie-proposed-updates; urgency=medium
+
+  * debian/patches:
++ Add 0009_support-ldapi-uris.patch. Accept ldapi:/// style URIs. (Closes:
+  #792120).
+
+ -- Mike Gabriel   Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:03:02 +0200
+
 ldap2zone (0.2-5) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Rewrite revert-broken-zones.patch to use named-checkzone to check
diff -Nru ldap2zone-0.2/debian/patches/0009_support-ldapi-uris.patch ldap2zone-0.2/debian/patches/0009_support-ldapi-uris.patch
--- ldap2zone-0.2/debian/patches/0009_support-ldapi-uris.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ ldap2zone-0.2/debian/patches/0009_support-ldapi-uris.patch	2015-07-16 09:02:16.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+commit 23c0324685aa4db47c5b30e7a16cceb8c3297c33
+Author: Petter Reinholdtsen 
+Date:   Sun Jul 12 09:27:12 2015 +0200
+
+Accept ldapi style URLs too (Closes: #792120).
+
+diff --git a/ldap2bind b/ldap2bind
+index 89f44bf..452cfd3 100755
+--- a/ldap2bind
 b/ldap2bind
+@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
+ [ -r /etc/default/ldap2zone ] && . /etc/default/ldap2zone
+ 
+ case "$LDAP_URI" in 
+-ldap://*|ldaps://*) ;; 
++ldap://*|ldaps://*|ldapi://*) ;;
+  *) LDAP_URI="ldap://${LDAP_URI}; ;; 
+  esac
+ 
diff -Nru ldap2zone-0.2/debian/patches/series ldap2zone-0.2/debian/patches/series
--- ldap2zone-0.2/debian/patches/series	2015-07-16 08:58:42.0 +0200
+++ ldap2zone-0.2/debian/patches/series	2015-07-16 09:02:35.0 +0200
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@
 avoid-signed-unsigned-warning.patch
 hardening.patch
 unused-variables.patch
+0009_support-ldapi-uris.patch
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 15:58:00 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
> 
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 09:09:13 +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> 
> > Please consider accepting the following jessie-pu for package ldap2zone.
> > 
> >   * debian/patches:
> > + Add 0009_support-ldapi-uris.patch. Accept ldapi:/// style URIs. 
> > (Closes:
> >   #792120).
> > 
> > This allows people to use ldapi:// style URIs with ldap2zone.
> > 
> > Accepting this change in jessie will be highly welcome and is relevant
> > for the Debian Edu development.
> > 
> It's not clear to me why that would warrant a stable update, please
> elaborate on why this is needed now.
> 
No reply since August, closing.

Cheers,
Julien--- End Message ---

Bug#787962: marked as done (jessie-pu: package pluma/1.8.1+dfsg1-2+deb8u1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:30:46 +
with message-id <20160221103046.gb6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#787962: jessie-pu: package pluma/1.8.1+dfsg1-2+deb8u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #787962,
regarding jessie-pu: package pluma/1.8.1+dfsg1-2+deb8u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
787962: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=787962
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

+  * debian/control:
++ Add D (pluma): python-gtksourceview2. (Closes: #785243).

Without this dependency, a couple of pluma plugins cannot
be activated -- they just get grayed out. Here is the list:

- External Tools
- Python Console
- Quick Open
- Snippets

It would be good to see this fixed for Debian 8.2.

light+love,
Mike

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 
'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
diff -Nru pluma-1.8.1+dfsg1/debian/changelog pluma-1.8.1+dfsg1/debian/changelog
--- pluma-1.8.1+dfsg1/debian/changelog	2014-05-05 12:50:48.0 +0200
+++ pluma-1.8.1+dfsg1/debian/changelog	2015-06-07 01:19:53.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+pluma (1.8.1+dfsg1-2+deb8u1) jessie-proposed-updates; urgency=medium
+
+  * debian/control:
++ Add D (pluma): python-gtksourceview2. (Closes: #785243).
+
+ -- Mike Gabriel   Sun, 07 Jun 2015 01:19:14 +0200
+
 pluma (1.8.1+dfsg1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/rules:
diff -Nru pluma-1.8.1+dfsg1/debian/control pluma-1.8.1+dfsg1/debian/control
--- pluma-1.8.1+dfsg1/debian/control	2014-04-22 14:40:07.0 +0200
+++ pluma-1.8.1+dfsg1/debian/control	2015-06-07 01:19:04.0 +0200
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
  pluma-common (= ${source:Version}),
  mate-desktop-common,
  iso-codes,
+ python-gtksourceview2,
 Recommends: zenity
 Provides: mate-text-editor
 Breaks: mate-text-editor (<< 1.5.0)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 15:45:19 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
> 
> On Sun, Jun  7, 2015 at 01:30:37 +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> 
> > +  * debian/control:
> > ++ Add D (pluma): python-gtksourceview2. (Closes: #785243).
> > 
> > Without this dependency, a couple of pluma plugins cannot
> > be activated -- they just get grayed out. Here is the list:
> > 
> > - External Tools
> > - Python Console
> > - Quick Open
> > - Snippets
> > 
> > It would be good to see this fixed for Debian 8.2.
> > 
> How essential are those plugins to the use of pluma?
> 
No reply since August, closing.

Cheers,
Julien--- End Message ---

Bug#785721: marked as done (jessie-pu: package mate-terminal/1.8.1+dfsg1-4+deb8u1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:28:56 +
with message-id <20160221102856.gz6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#785721: jessie-pu: package 
mate-terminal/1.8.1+dfsg1-4+deb8u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #785721,
regarding jessie-pu: package mate-terminal/1.8.1+dfsg1-4+deb8u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
785721: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785721
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

+  [ Martin Wimpress ]
+  * debian/patches:
+   + Add 0001_mate-terminal-wrapper.patch. Adds support for double quoted
+ strings. Adapted from gnome-terminal.wrapper. (Closes: #783000).

-> This update for mate-terminal in jessie replaces mate-terminal.wrapper
(written in Python) with one adapted from gnome-terminal.wrapper (written
in Perl) so that is now supports double quoted commands. This fixes the
following downstream (Ubuntu) issue:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mate/+bug/1445198

It may also fix the a similar issue in Debian, though untested.

About the language change (Python -> Perl). Martin and I (both of use do
a lot of Python development) both stared at the script for half a day and
could not find a simple way to support double quotes. So at the end of
the day, we chose to switch over to the Perl script (which upstream did,
as well).

light+love,
Mike


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 
'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
diff -Nru mate-terminal-1.8.1+dfsg1/debian/changelog mate-terminal-1.8.1+dfsg1/debian/changelog
--- mate-terminal-1.8.1+dfsg1/debian/changelog	2015-01-06 10:19:42.0 +0100
+++ mate-terminal-1.8.1+dfsg1/debian/changelog	2015-05-19 17:08:04.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+mate-terminal (1.8.1+dfsg1-4+deb8u1) jessie-proposed-updates; urgency=medium
+
+  [ Martin Wimpress ]
+  * debian/patches:
+   + Add 0001_mate-terminal-wrapper.patch. Adds support for double quoted
+ strings. Adapted from gnome-terminal.wrapper. (Closes: #783000).
+
+ -- Mike Gabriel   Tue, 19 May 2015 01:42:46 +0100
+
 mate-terminal (1.8.1+dfsg1-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * debian/mate-terminal.{postinst,prerm):
diff -Nru mate-terminal-1.8.1+dfsg1/debian/patches/0001_mate-terminal-wrapper.patch mate-terminal-1.8.1+dfsg1/debian/patches/0001_mate-terminal-wrapper.patch
--- mate-terminal-1.8.1+dfsg1/debian/patches/0001_mate-terminal-wrapper.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ mate-terminal-1.8.1+dfsg1/debian/patches/0001_mate-terminal-wrapper.patch	2015-05-19 17:06:40.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+Description: Adds support for double quoted strings.
+ Add 0001_mate-terminal-wrapper.patch, adapted from gnome-termnal.wrapper,
+ that adds support for double quoted strings. (Closes LP: #1445198).
+Author: Martin Wimpress 
+Bug-Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1445198
+
+--- mate-terminal-1.8.1+dfsg1.orig/mate-terminal.wrapper
 mate-terminal-1.8.1+dfsg1/mate-terminal.wrapper
+@@ -1,44 +1,81 @@
+-#!/usr/bin/env python
++#!/usr/bin/perl -w
+ 
+-import sys
+-import os
+-import subprocess
++my $login=0;
+ 
+-newargs = ['mate-terminal']
+-oldargs = sys.argv[1:]
+-
+-while True:
+-try:
+-arg = oldargs.pop(0)
+-
+-if arg == '-display':
+-os.environ['DISPLAY'] = oldargs.pop(0)
+-elif arg == '-name':
+-newargs.append('--window-with-profile=' + oldargs.pop(0))
+-elif arg == '-n':
+-sys.stderr.write('Set an icon in your profile')
+-elif arg == '-T' or arg == '-title':
+-newargs.append('-t')
+-newargs.append(oldargs.pop(0))
+-elif arg == '-ls' or arg == '+ls':
+-sys.stderr.write('Login shell not supported.  Set in your profile.')
+-elif arg == '-geometry':
+-newargs.append('--geometry=' + oldargs.pop(0))
+-elif arg == '-fn':
+-newargs.append('--font=' + oldargs.pop(0))
+-elif arg == '-fg':
+-newargs.append('--foreground=' + oldargs.pop(0))
+-elif arg == '-bg':
+-newargs.append('--background=' + oldargs.pop(0))
+-   

Bug#783708: marked as done (jessie-pu: package youtube-dl/2015.02.28-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:27:16 +
with message-id <20160221102716.gy6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#783708: jessie-pu: package youtube-dl/2015.02.28-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #783708,
regarding jessie-pu: package youtube-dl/2015.02.28-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
783708: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783708
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: jessie
Severity: normal

Dear Release Team,

youtube-dl is one of those packages that needs to be
frequently kept up to date with upstream in order to be
consistently useful.  The version currently in jessie
(2014.08.05-1+deb8u1) is failing for many Youtube downloads
(see for example bug #781180).

The package maintainer has uploaded a newer upstream version
(2015.02.28-1) to unstable which resolves the problem; please
could this be added to jessie-updates so that youtube-dl can
work well in jessie before the next point release?

The maintainer agrees with this idea (see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781180#25 ).

Thanks very much.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

-

ONLY AT VFEmail! - Use our Metadata Mitigator to keep your email out of the 
NSA's hands!
$24.95 ONETIME Lifetime accounts with Privacy Features!  
15GB disk! No bandwidth quotas!
Commercial and Bulk Mail Options!  
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 19:49:51 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

> On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 17:33 +, transylvania wrote:
> > Adam D. Barratt:
> > > If someone provides a source debdiff for a proposed package, which has
> > > been tested on Jessie, then we can certainly look at that.
> > 
> > Hello Adam,
> > 
> > Thanks for your reply.  I can confirm that the 2015.02.28-1 package
> > installs and works on jessie.
> > 
> > It's a new upstream version and so the source debdiff is quite large,
> > about 2.4MB; please can you confirm that it's OK to attach that here?
> 
> You can, although it won't reach the mailing list at that size.
> 
> Without looking at the diff, it often helps to filter the debdiff to
> exclude documentation, automatically generated files, test suite changes
> and so on. If you do so, please mention what you've filtered.
> 
> Depending on how frequently the package changes and how large future
> changes are likely to be, it may be that maintaining the package via
> -updates doesn't make sense, but we'll see.
> 
No followup since last April, closing.

Cheers,
Julien--- End Message ---

Processed: tagging 784373

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 784373 - moreinfo
Bug #784373 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package ceph/0.80.11-1 (pre 
approval)
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
784373: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784373
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#782190: marked as done (pu: package nginx/1.6.3-1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:25:57 +
with message-id <20160221102557.gx6...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#782190: pre-approve: nginx/1.6.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #782190,
regarding pu: package nginx/1.6.3-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
782190: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782190
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal


Hello,

I have prepared an upload for nginx (1.6.3-1) and I'd like to request a
pre-approval for jessie.

1.6.3 is the latest upstream stable bugfix release including 6 bug fixes[0].
One of them fixes a tcp nodelay issue with spdy that effectively makes spdy
unusuitable for production use.

Upstream already maintains a stable branch and has proven that it does
it well, backporting only what's absolutely needed. I believe it is
better for debian and nginx maintainers to follow suit and package 1.6.3
for jessie.

I am attaching a debdiff or the proposed upload. (I'll also file a bug report
for packaging 1.6.3 and include it the changelog).

Upstream changelog:

*) Feature: now the "tcp_nodelay" directive works with SPDY connections.

*) Bugfix: in error handling.
   Thanks to Yichun Zhang and Daniil Bondarev.

*) Bugfix: alerts "header already sent" appeared in logs if the
   "post_action" directive was used; the bug had appeared in 1.5.4.

*) Bugfix: alerts "sem_post() failed" might appear in logs.

*) Bugfix: in hash table handling.
   Thanks to Chris West.

*) Bugfix: in integer overflow handling.
   Thanks to Régis Leroy.

[0] tcp_nodelay is marked as a feature, but it's actually an important
bugfix

diff -Nru nginx-1.6.2/auto/unix nginx-1.6.3/auto/unix
--- nginx-1.6.2/auto/unix   2014-09-16 15:23:19.0 +0300
+++ nginx-1.6.3/auto/unix   2015-04-07 18:58:37.0 +0300
@@ -489,6 +489,7 @@
 ngx_type="time_t"; . auto/types/sizeof
 ngx_param=NGX_TIME_T_SIZE; ngx_value=$ngx_size; . auto/types/value
 ngx_param=NGX_TIME_T_LEN; ngx_value=$ngx_max_len; . auto/types/value
+ngx_param=NGX_MAX_TIME_T_VALUE; ngx_value=$ngx_max_value; . auto/types/value
 
 
 # syscalls, libc calls and some features
diff -Nru nginx-1.6.2/CHANGES nginx-1.6.3/CHANGES
--- nginx-1.6.2/CHANGES 2014-09-16 15:23:24.0 +0300
+++ nginx-1.6.3/CHANGES 2015-04-07 18:58:53.0 +0300
@@ -1,4 +1,23 @@
 
+Changes with nginx 1.6.3 07 Apr 2015
+
+*) Feature: now the "tcp_nodelay" directive works with SPDY connections.
+
+*) Bugfix: in error handling.
+   Thanks to Yichun Zhang and Daniil Bondarev.
+
+*) Bugfix: alerts "header already sent" appeared in logs if the
+   "post_action" directive was used; the bug had appeared in 1.5.4.
+
+*) Bugfix: alerts "sem_post() failed" might appear in logs.
+
+*) Bugfix: in hash table handling.
+   Thanks to Chris West.
+
+*) Bugfix: in integer overflow handling.
+   Thanks to Régis Leroy.
+
+
 Changes with nginx 1.6.2 16 Sep 2014
 
 *) Security: it was possible to reuse SSL sessions in unrelated contexts
diff -Nru nginx-1.6.2/CHANGES.ru nginx-1.6.3/CHANGES.ru
--- nginx-1.6.2/CHANGES.ru  2014-09-16 15:23:22.0 +0300
+++ nginx-1.6.3/CHANGES.ru  2015-04-07 18:58:47.0 +0300
@@ -1,4 +1,24 @@
 
+Изменения в nginx 1.6.3   07.04.2015
+
+*) Добавление: теперь директива tcp_nodelay работает для
+   SPDY-соединений.
+
+*) Исправление: в обработке ошибок.
+   Спасибо Yichun Zhang и Даниилу Бондареву.
+
+*) Исправление: при использовании директивы post_action в лог писались
+   сообщения "header already sent"; ошибка появилась в nginx 1.5.4.
+
+*) Исправление: в лог могли писаться сообщения "sem_post() failed".
+
+*) Исправление: в обработке хэш-таблиц.
+   Спасибо Chris West.
+
+*) Исправление: в обработке целочисленных переполнений.
+   Спасибо Régis Leroy.
+
+
 Изменения в nginx 1.6.2   16.09.2014
 
 *) Безопасность: при использовании общего для нескольких блоков server
diff -Nru nginx-1.6.2/debian/changelog nginx-1.6.3/debian/changelog
--- nginx-1.6.2/debian/changelog2014-12-01 13:12:00.0 +0200
+++ nginx-1.6.3/debian/changelog2015-04-09 11:00:03.0 +0300
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+nginx (1.6.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  [ Christos Trochalakis ]
+  * New upstream release.
+Fixes tcp nodelay issue in spdy module.
+
+ -- 

Bug#785047: vsftpd/3.0.2-17+deb8u1

[Jörg Frings-Fürst]

Am Sonntag, den 21.02.2016, 09:50 +0100 schrieb John Paul Adrian
Glaubitz:
> On 02/20/2016 11:09 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Doesn't look like that's happening.  Closing.
> 
> Sorry, I completely missed the pu updates Joerg prepared. That was
> not
> done intentionally, but it was rather somewhere lost in
> communication.
> 
> I'd be happy to take carre of vsftpd.
> 
> @Joerg: Could you re-upload the package to mentors?
> 

done.. [1]


> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 

CU
Jörg

[1] 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vsftpd/vsftpd_3.0.2-17+deb8u1.dsc
-- 
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB  30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D
GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D
GPG Key: 8CA1D25D
CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56

Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31).

Jörg Frings-Fürst
D-54538 Bausendorf

Threema: SYR8SJXB

IRC: j_...@freenode.net
 j_...@oftc.net

My wish list: 
 - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#798780: release.debian.org: Please let playonlinux migrate to testing

[Bertrand Marc]

Le 20/02/2016 22:53, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> Seems to be in testing now, closing.
> 
> Cheers,
> Julien

Hello Julien,

Indeed playonlinux migrated to testing, thanks to Markus Koschany who
"removed dependency on wine32|wine32-development again to ensure the
package can migrate to testing." in 4.2.9-2.

Ideally, this would only be temporary as playonlinux should really
depend on wine32|wine32-development.

Do you think we could find a solution to restore the dependency and let
playonlinux migrate to testing ?

Cheers,
Bertrand



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#815400: transition: ros-ros-comm

[Jochen Sprickerhof]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

we want to transition librosconsole to link against log4cxx instead of an
internal print version. librosconsole exports these symbols, so other packages
depend on the choice and we can't simply switch it. We went for a Soname bump
because it's Debian internal anyhow, as upstream declined to add one.

The new version of ros-ros-comm is in experimental already.

Ben file:

title = "ros-ros-comm";
is_affected = .depends ~ "librosconsole0d" | .depends ~ "librosconsole1d";
is_good = .depends ~ "librosconsole1d";
is_bad = .depends ~ "librosconsole0d";

We are maintainer of all reverse dependencies and we did test rebuilds already
and have all needed patches prepared. All rdepends are listed here:

https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ros-ros-comm.html

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Bug#785047: vsftpd/3.0.2-17+deb8u1

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz]

On 02/20/2016 11:09 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Doesn't look like that's happening.  Closing.

Sorry, I completely missed the pu updates Joerg prepared. That was not
done intentionally, but it was rather somewhere lost in communication.

I'd be happy to take carre of vsftpd.

@Joerg: Could you re-upload the package to mentors?

Thanks,
Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Bug#809319: jessie-pu: package sane-backends/1.0.24-8

[John Paul Adrian Glaubitz]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 02/21/2016 07:38 AM, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> I have no upload rights. So I ask my sponsor to upload it. But he
> has a lot of work in his job.
> 
> It's fine if someone can upload it. The package is on mentors[1].

I'm taking care of it right now. No worries.

Just got up. It's Sunday after all ;).

Adrian

- -- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
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=uejZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Processed: aces3: FTBFS on powerpc

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 813722 openmpi/1.10.2-5
Bug #813722 [src:openmpi] aces3: FTBFS on powerpc
Marked as found in versions openmpi/1.10.2-5.
> unblock 813128 by 813722
Bug #813128 [release.debian.org] transition: openmpi
813128 was blocked by: 813724 813725 813799 813498 813814 813951 813722
813128 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 813128: 813722
> merge 813722 814183
Bug #813722 [src:openmpi] aces3: FTBFS on powerpc
Bug #813722 [src:openmpi] aces3: FTBFS on powerpc
Added tag(s) sid and stretch.
Bug #814183 [src:openmpi] openmpi 1.10.2 is broken on powerpc
Merged 813722 814183
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
813128: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813128
813722: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813722
814183: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814183
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems