Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

[Adam D. Barratt]

On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 18:51 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Sat 2016-08-06 17:15:25 -0400, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Thanks; please feel free to upload that, with a small tweak:
> >
> > +publicsuffix (20160703-0+deb8u1) stable; urgency=medium
> > +
> > +  * prepare for stable-proposed-updates.
> >
> > "jessie" is generally preferred as the changelog distribution and maybe
> > "Upload to stable" or something similar?
[...]
> > Every couple of months is when we aim (not always successfully) to do a
> > stable point release, so that hopefully works out well all around.
> 
> I've never maintained this class of package before.  do i just do
> regular uploads to "jessie" as new versions of the package become
> available, or do i need to do a jessie-pu bug report for each one?

The latter, please.

Regards,

Adam

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

[Daniel Kahn Gillmor]

On Sat 2016-08-06 17:15:25 -0400, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Thanks; please feel free to upload that, with a small tweak:
>
> +publicsuffix (20160703-0+deb8u1) stable; urgency=medium
> +
> +  * prepare for stable-proposed-updates.
>
> "jessie" is generally preferred as the changelog distribution and maybe
> "Upload to stable" or something similar?

changed and uploaded (as a source-only upload; please let me know if
that causes trouble; i always prefer to do source-only uploads where the
build infrastructure supports it)

>> The git tree's jessie branch which i'm proposing is at commit ID
>> 6520ee81d3e2d73192e67685652ef6bccdb2e637, fwiw, so you don't have to
>> worry about it changing.
>
> Thanks for that, but we'd still prefer p-u bug reports to be
> free-standing.

no problem, just providing multiple ways to access the data.

> Every couple of months is when we aim (not always successfully) to do a
> stable point release, so that hopefully works out well all around.

I've never maintained this class of package before.  do i just do
regular uploads to "jessie" as new versions of the package become
available, or do i need to do a jessie-pu bug report for each one?

   --dkg


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#831335: jessie-pu: package publicsuffix/20160703-1

[Daniel Kahn Gillmor]

On Mon 2016-08-08 18:51:32 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Sat 2016-08-06 17:15:25 -0400, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Thanks; please feel free to upload that, with a small tweak:
>>
>> +publicsuffix (20160703-0+deb8u1) stable; urgency=medium
>> +
>> +  * prepare for stable-proposed-updates.
>>
>> "jessie" is generally preferred as the changelog distribution and maybe
>> "Upload to stable" or something similar?
>
> changed and uploaded (as a source-only upload; please let me know if
> that causes trouble; i always prefer to do source-only uploads where the
> build infrastructure supports it)

hm, it looks like jessie can't handle source-only uploads that generate
arch-indep packages, according to the rejection notice i just got.

That's a shame.  I guess i'll try again and include the arch-indep
binary in my upload.  Is there any chance that the jessie builders can
learn to handle such a thing or is that just for unstable?

--dkg


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # somehow these got removed after
> # https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833377;msg=29
> # ...
> block 833377 by 833753 811674 833770 833756 831207 833776 831096 831074 
> 833778 831149 831129 833773 831121 833780 833775
Bug #833377 [release.debian.org] transition: boost1.61
833377 was blocked by: 833794 833797
833377 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 833377: 833776, 831121, 833773, 833770, 833778, 
831074, 833753, 831207, 833756, 811674, 833780, 833775, 831096, 831129, and 
831149
> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
833377: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833377
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: cegui-mk2: FTBFS with Boost 1.61

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 833377 by 833797
Bug #833377 [release.debian.org] transition: boost1.61
833377 was blocked by: 833794
833377 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 833377: 833797
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
833377: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833377
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: freeorion: FTBFS with boost1.61

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> clone 833773 -1
Bug #833773 [src:freeorion] freeorion: FTBFS with boost1.61
Bug 833773 cloned as bug 833794
833377 was blocked by: 833773 833770 833756 833775 833776 831074 831149 833780 
833778 811674 831207 831129 833753 831121 831096
833377 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 833377: 833794; removed blocking bug(s) of 833377: 
833753, 811674, 833770, 833756, 831207, 833776, 831096, 831074, 833778, 831149, 
831129, 833773, 831121, 833780, and 833775
> reassign -1 src:boost1.61
Bug #833794 [src:freeorion] freeorion: FTBFS with boost1.61
Bug reassigned from package 'src:freeorion' to 'src:boost1.61'.
No longer marked as found in versions freeorion/0.4.5+git20160707-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #833794 to the same values 
previously set
> retitle -1 error: no type named 'types' in 'boost
Bug #833794 [src:boost1.61] freeorion: FTBFS with boost1.61
Changed Bug title to 'error: no type named 'types' in 'boost' from 'freeorion: 
FTBFS with boost1.61'.
> found -1 1.61.0+dfsg-2.1
Bug #833794 [src:boost1.61] error: no type named 'types' in 'boost
Marked as found in versions boost1.61/1.61.0+dfsg-2.1.
> forwarded -1 https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/12349
Bug #833794 [src:boost1.61] error: no type named 'types' in 'boost
Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/12349' from 
'https://github.com/freeorion/freeorion/issues/777'.
> affects -1 freeorion
Bug #833794 [src:boost1.61] error: no type named 'types' in 'boost
Added indication that 833794 affects freeorion
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
833377: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833377
833773: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833773
833794: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833794
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Blocking bugs

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 833377 by 831129 833773 833775 831074 831096 833776 831149 831207 
> 831121 833778 833780
Bug #833377 [release.debian.org] transition: boost1.61
833377 was blocked by: 833756 811674 833753 833773 833770
833377 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 833377: 831207, 833780, 831149, 833778, 831096, 
831121, 831129, 833775, 831074, and 833776
> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
833377: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833377
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: blocking bugs

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 833377 by 811674 833770 833773
Bug #833377 [release.debian.org] transition: boost1.61
833377 was blocked by: 833753 833756
833377 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 833377: 811674, 833770, and 833773
> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
833377: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833377
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: blocking bugs

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # boost1.61
> block 833377 by 833753 833756
Bug #833377 [release.debian.org] transition: boost1.61
833377 was not blocked by any bugs.
833377 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 833377: 833753 and 833756
> # icu57
> block 819530 by 833753 833754 833755 833756
Bug #819530 [release.debian.org] transition: icu
819530 was not blocked by any bugs.
819530 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 819530: 833754, 833756, 833755, and 833753
> # boost1.60 RM
> block 833757 by 833758 833759 833760
Bug #833757 [ftp.debian.org] RM: boost1.60 -- RoQA; superseded by boost1.61
833757 was not blocked by any bugs.
833757 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 833757: 833758, 833759, and 833760
> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
819530: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819530
833377: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833377
833757: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833757
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> forwarded 819530 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-icu.html
Bug #819530 [release.debian.org] transition: icu
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-icu.html'.
> --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
819530: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819530
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#833747: nmu: binutils (<< 2.27) dependencies

[Matthias Klose]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

please binNMU binutils (<< 2.27) dependencies: eztrace lush tulip, building with
binutils (>= 2.27).

Bug#833720: transition: libzhuyin

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 08/08/16 11:29, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Due to ibus-libzhuyin, libzhuyin transition and opencc transition
> (#833589) need to be done together. Since opencc transition starts, we
> need to start this transition as well.
> 
> Please tell me when I can do uploads to unstable, thanks.

That's fine. Go ahead.

Emilio

Processed: Re: Bug#833720: transition: libzhuyin

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #833720 [release.debian.org] transition: libzhuyin
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
833720: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833720
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#833720: transition: libzhuyin

[陳昌倬]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

Due to ibus-libzhuyin, libzhuyin transition and opencc transition
(#833589) need to be done together. Since opencc transition starts, we
need to start this transition as well.

Please tell me when I can do uploads to unstable, thanks.


Ben file:

title = "libzhuyin";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libzhuyin6" | .depends ~ "libzhuyin7";
is_good = .depends ~ "libzhuyin7";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libzhuyin6";

Dependency:

- ibus-libzhuyin: experimental version works


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 
'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

-- 
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) 
Debian Developer (https://nm.debian.org/public/person/czchen)
Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896  C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D
  BA04 346D C2E1 FE63 C790  8793 CC65 B0CD EC27 5D5B


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Bug#833589: transition: opencc

[Aron Xu]

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 7:13 PM, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)  wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 12:33:45PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 06/08/16 17:21, Aron Xu wrote:
>> >  - ibus-libzhuyin: experimental version works
>
> I will handle this package, thanks for the transition.
>

opencc is uploaded, please go ahead.

Regards,
Aron