Bug#890506: stretch-pu: package ntp/1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-3+deb9u2
On 23.02.2018 18:44, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi Adam, > On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 12:55 +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: >> I'd like to update ntp in Stretch to fix Bug#887385. There have been >> numerous >> reports about ntpd segfaulting with the libc6 update from >> stretch-proposed-updates or in sid. It does not happen on all >> machines (I for >> one did not see it once). >> >> There has been an upstream bug and an upstream patch to increase the >> stack size. This patch has been part of sid/buster for some weeks now >> and >> one of the reporters on the bug confirmed it being fixed. >> > > Please go ahead. Uploaded and ACCEPTed. Bernhard
Bug#891346: RM: jirc/1.0-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm I confirmed the information in #800450 that jirc works with the version of libpoe-filter-xml-perl in wheezy (sic). With the version of libpoe-filter-xml-perl in jessie and stretch it fails pretty early even on --help.
Bug#890935: transition: console-bridge
uploaded to unstable. On 23 Feb 2018 13:51, "Emilio Pozuelo Monfort"wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 23/02/18 12:14, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > > On 23/02/18 10:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >>> > >>> Please schedule binNMUs for the above mentioned packages on all > >>> architectures. > >> > >> First you need to upload console-bridge to unstable. Before doing that, > have you > >> tested that those packages build fine with the new console-bridge? > >> > > > > I ran ratt against the changes file and all the packages listed above > > passed the build in experimental (same versions than unstable) without > > any error. I assume that the next step is upload console-bridge to > > unstable. > > Yes, go ahead. > > Emilio >
Bug#884571: [Pkg-privacy-maintainers] Bug#884571: RM: torbrowser-launcher/0.1.9-1+deb8u3
Adam D. Barratt: > # Broken Depends: > onionshare/contrib: onionshare So I guess Jessie should first get the fix we applied to onionshare in testing/sid, i.e. move torbrowser-launcher to Recommends.
Re: Proposed (lib)curl switch to openssl 1.1
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:14:24AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi again, > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 06:16:34PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > So, despite Julien's valid objection that core library conflicts cause > > dist-upgrades to be more brittle, I think the right answer here is: > > > - keep all sonames as-is. > > - rename libcurl3 to libcurl4. > > - leave the package names of the other variants as-is. > > - *if* libcurl-gnutls.so.4 and libcurl-nss.so.4 sonames are known to exist > > elsewhere outside the Debian ecosystem, fix the symbol versions for > > libcurl3-gnutls and libcurl3-nss to use symbol aliases, so that CURL_FOO_4 > > is used as the preferred name and CURL_FOO_3 is for compatibility only. > > (This is only worth doing if this increases binary compatibility; > > otherwise it's better to maintain bidirectional binary compatibility for > > Debian-built binaries.) > > - change the symbol versions for libcurl4 to CURL_OPENSSL_4. > > > I would be willing to prepare a patch that implements this. > > I've done this now and raised an MP: > > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/curl/merge_requests/3 > > (I'm assuming there is no point in CURL_FOO_4 symbol version for > libcurl-gnutls and libcurl-nss, because these sonames come from a > Debian-specific patch and therefore there's no upstream binary compatibility > to be concerned about.) > > Thoughts on this? > > In terms of ABI changes, this appears to be a strict subset of what > Alessandro had proposed and would be binary-compatible for libcurl.so.4; so > at minimum, we will probably adopt this change in Ubuntu and proceed with > the transition ASAP there, even if Debian later decides to change the ABI > for gnutls and nss variants also. I'm fine with going ahead with just the libcurl3 -> libcurl4 transition for now. Julien: is this something that the Release Team would be ok with? As Steve pinted out before, libcurl3 has significantly lower usage than lubcurl3-gnutls so impact should be somewhat more limited. I'd like to go ahead and upload Steve's patch to experimental (which means NEW queue) soon, and then request the transition. Cheers signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#891285: stretch-pu: package inputlirc/23-2+b2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello release team, with maintainer's permission (Cc'd, see #879458) I'd like to fix the inputlirc package in the upcoming stretch point release, see debdiff below. Some background if I understood correctly: During build, inputlirc picks some information from a kernel header file. However, that header file was split in linux kernel commit v4.3-rc4-49-gf902dd893427, subsequently some definitions were no longer found. Obviously, the binNMU leading to 23-2+b2 was already done after the kernel header package in Debian was updated, resulting the the described behaviour. Kind regards, Christoph diff -u inputlirc-23/debian/changelog inputlirc-23/debian/changelog --- inputlirc-23/debian/changelog +++ inputlirc-23/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +inputlirc (23-2+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium + + * Include input-event-codes.h instead of input.h. Closes: #879458 +Thanks to Ingo Schneider for reporting the bug and providing the fix. + + -- Christoph BiedlSat, 24 Feb 2018 09:25:27 +0100 + inputlirc (23-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Set Architecture: linux-any, since inputlirc depends on the Linux input only in patch2: unchanged: --- inputlirc-23.orig/Makefile +++ inputlirc-23/Makefile @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ all: $(SBIN) -names.h: /usr/include/linux/input.h gennames +names.h: /usr/include/linux/input-event-codes.h gennames ./gennames $< > $@ inputlircd: inputlircd.c /usr/include/linux/input.h names.h signature.asc Description: PGP signature