Bug#965057: transition: libgc
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libgc.html Control: tags -1 + confirmed On 2020-07-15 12:14:06 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Packages build ok with the libgc from experimental, except for guile. Filed > patches to fix the guile builds with make 4.3, however guile-2.0 fails tests > on > amd64. guile-2.0 could be removed from testing, only has three rdeps on leaf > packages. guile-2.0 has no reverse dependencies in testing anymore, so I've added a removal hint. Are you going to take care of guile-2.2? Please go ahead with the upload to unstable. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#965971: transition: libgo
On 2020-07-21 19:31:49 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Two packages are built using gccgo, the binNMUs should be done with an extra > b-d > on gccgo (>= 4:10.1). > > uswgi > gitbrute binNMUs scheduled Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#965970: transition: libgphobos
On 2020-07-21 19:34:55 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 7/21/20 7:16 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > These packages need rebuilding for gdc-10. Maybe it's safe to add an extra > > b-d > > on gdc (>= 1:10.1) for the binNMUs. > > that should be: gdc (>= 4:10.1) I've scheduled the binNMUs. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Bug#965057: transition: libgc
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libgc.html Bug #965057 [release.debian.org] transition: libgc Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#965057 to the same value > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #965057 [release.debian.org] transition: libgc Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 965057: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965057 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#965972: transition: libasan
On 2020-07-21 19:32:51 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Two packages are built using the address sanitzer, the binNMUs should be done > with an extra b-d on gcc (>= 4:10.1). > > wlcs > goxel binNMUs scheduled Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#962237: perl_5.28.1-6+deb10u1 uploaded
Ouch - I just completely missed your previous response on this until I was reminded by your rescheduling email today. Uploaded now, hope it's in time. Best Dominic
Re: Upcoming stable point release (10.5)
Hi, On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 15:37 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2020-06-27 at 14:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > The next point release for "buster" (10.5) is scheduled for > > Saturday July 18th. Processing of new uploads into buster-proposed- > > updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. > > Unfortunately this has had to be delayed slightly. > > A new date will be announced soon. This will now be Saturday August 1st. Regards, Adam
Bug#965970: transition: libgphobos
On 7/21/20 7:16 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > These packages need rebuilding for gdc-10. Maybe it's safe to add an extra > b-d > on gdc (>= 1:10.1) for the binNMUs. that should be: gdc (>= 4:10.1)
Bug#965972: transition: libasan
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Two packages are built using the address sanitzer, the binNMUs should be done with an extra b-d on gcc (>= 4:10.1). wlcs goxel
Bug#965971: transition: libgo
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Two packages are built using gccgo, the binNMUs should be done with an extra b-d on gccgo (>= 4:10.1). uswgi gitbrute
Bug#965970: transition: libgphobos
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition These packages need rebuilding for gdc-10. Maybe it's safe to add an extra b-d on gdc (>= 1:10.1) for the binNMUs. a7xpg cheesecutter dub dustmite gunroar ii-esu mu-cade parsec47 projectl tatan titanion torus-trooper tumiki-fighters val-and-rick
Bug#961654: buster-pu: package bzip2/1.0.6-9.2~deb10u1
On Wed, 27 May 2020 11:56:07 +0200 "Santiago R.R." wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: buster > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Dear Release Managers, > > Since 1.0.6-9, bzip2 was built without the -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > CPPFLAG, and so it's not able to handle > 2GB files in 32-bit archs. > See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944557 > > I've uploaded a fixed version to unstable yesterday. It would be great > to fix it also in buster. Please, consider the attached debdiff. > Would it be OK for you to upload it? > > I've confirmed the issue is solved in an armhf machine running buster. … Dear RM, I would like to include another important bug fix in this upload. Attached you can find a refreshed debdiff that also address #965309 in buster: https://bugs.debian.org/965309 Would it be OK to upload it? Thanks, -- Santiago diff -Nru bzip2-1.0.6/debian/changelog bzip2-1.0.6/debian/changelog --- bzip2-1.0.6/debian/changelog2019-07-10 21:17:52.0 +0200 +++ bzip2-1.0.6/debian/changelog2020-07-21 10:36:47.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +bzip2 (1.0.6-9.2~deb10u2) buster; urgency=medium + + * Append -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 variable to buildflags, to renable handling +big files in 32-bit archs (Closes: #944557) + * debian/patches/40-bzdiff-l.patch: Fix bzdiff does not work when comparing +two bzip2 compressed files. Thanks to Joey Schulze . +(Closes: #965309) + + -- Santiago Ruano Rincón Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:36:47 +0200 + bzip2 (1.0.6-9.2~deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium * Rebuild for buster diff -Nru bzip2-1.0.6/debian/patches/40-bzdiff-l.patch bzip2-1.0.6/debian/patches/40-bzdiff-l.patch --- bzip2-1.0.6/debian/patches/40-bzdiff-l.patch2019-06-24 22:16:40.0 +0200 +++ bzip2-1.0.6/debian/patches/40-bzdiff-l.patch2020-07-21 10:32:51.0 +0200 @@ -2,10 +2,14 @@ This patch is far from sufficient. See the bug log for details. Bug-Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bzip2/+bug/735675 Origin: ubuntu, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bzip2/+bug/735675 +Reviewed-by: Santiago Ruano Rincón +Last-Update: 2020-07-20 a/bzdiff -+++ b/bzdiff -@@ -24,7 +24,11 @@ +Index: bzip2/bzdiff +=== +--- bzip2.orig/bzdiff bzip2/bzdiff +@@ -24,7 +24,11 @@ FILES= for ARG do case "$ARG" in @@ -18,12 +22,3 @@ *) if test -f "$ARG"; then FILES="$FILES $ARG" else -@@ -54,7 +58,7 @@ - exit 1 - } - bzip2 -cdfq "$2" > "$tmp" --bzip2 -cdfq "$1" | $comp $OPTIONS - "$tmp" -+bzip2 -cdfq "$1" | $comp "$OPTIONS" - "$tmp" - STAT="$?" - /bin/rm -f "$tmp";; - diff -Nru bzip2-1.0.6/debian/rules bzip2-1.0.6/debian/rules --- bzip2-1.0.6/debian/rules2019-06-24 22:16:40.0 +0200 +++ bzip2-1.0.6/debian/rules2020-07-21 10:31:21.0 +0200 @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS := hardening=+all DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND := -Wall -Winline DEB_CPPFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND := -D_REENTRANT +# This -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 is needed to make bzip2 able to handle > 2GB-size +# files in 32-bit archs. See #944557 +DEB_CPPFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND += -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk include /usr/share/dpkg/pkg-info.mk signature.asc Description: PGP signature
