Bug#996192: unblock: net-snmp/5.9.1+dfsg-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package net-snmp [ Reason ] net-snmp is not moving into bookworm due to a regression with pyagentx. However there is reason to believe this is due to a race condition in pyagentx test script https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pyagentx/-/merge_requests/2 [ Impact ] net-snmp will stay at 5.9, specifically the AES improvements will not be there and anything else that was added in the last year. [ Tests ] net-snmp passes all its autopkg tests see https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=net-snmp [ Risks ] I see no risk, the issue is pyagentx failing its tests. It's not a linking issue, pyagentx is pure python but uses snmpd to test itself. The problem is that if the agentx starts faster than snmpd the test fails because it cannot connect to the socket. [ Checklist ] [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing [ Other info ] unblock net-snmp/5.9.1+dfsg-3
Bug#996030: transition: libsidplayfp
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:45 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2021-10-10 17:25:10 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote: > > Small transition of libsidplayfp, affecting audacious-plugins, mpd and > > qmmp. > > I will upload its counterpart, sidplayfp when the transition is > > allowed to start. > > Please go ahead and while you're at it please also remove the > unnecessary Breaks+Replaces from libsidplayfp6. Correct, removed and uploaded. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS
Processed: Re: Bug#996030: transition: libsidplayfp
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #996030 [release.debian.org] transition: libsidplayfp Added tag(s) confirmed. > forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libsidplayfp.html Bug #996030 [release.debian.org] transition: libsidplayfp Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libsidplayfp.html'. -- 996030: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996030 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#996030: transition: libsidplayfp
Control: tags -1 confirmed Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libsidplayfp.html On 2021-10-10 17:25:10 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi RMs, > > Small transition of libsidplayfp, affecting audacious-plugins, mpd and qmmp. > I will upload its counterpart, sidplayfp when the transition is > allowed to start. Please go ahead and while you're at it please also remove the unnecessary Breaks+Replaces from libsidplayfp6. Cheers > > Regards, > Laszlo/GCS > -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Bug#996080: transition: pcl
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #996080 [release.debian.org] transition: pcl Added tag(s) confirmed. > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-pcl.html Bug #996080 [release.debian.org] transition: pcl Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-pcl.html'. -- 996080: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996080 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#996080: transition: pcl
Control: tags -1 confirmed Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-pcl.html On 2021-10-10 22:45:58 +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi release team, > > I would like to transition pcl. The autogenerated ben file looks fine > and ros-perception-pcl builds against the new version. For python-pcl I > will upload a fixed version myself. Please go ahead Cheers > > Cheers Jochen > -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#994086: marked as done (transition: netcdf)
Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2021 21:33:25 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#994086: transition: netcdf has caused the Debian Bug report #994086, regarding transition: netcdf to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 994086: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994086 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-netcdf.html Control: block -1 by 994003 991057 993992 The SONAME for NetCDF was bumped in 4.8.0 requiring a transition. Most rdeps built successfully, exception grace, gri, and ncl which FTBFS for unrelated reasons. Transition: netcdf libnetcdf18 (1:4.7.4-1) -> libnetcdf19 (1:4.8.1-1~exp1) The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows. adios (1.13.1-28.2) OK cmor (3.6.1-1) OK coda (2.22.1-1)OK dx (1:4.4.4-13) OK eccodes(2.23.0-1)OK exodusii (6.02.dfsg.1-8) OK gdal (3.3.2+dfsg-1)OK gerris (20131206+dfsg-19)OK grace (1:5.1.25-9) FTBFS (#994003) grads (3:2.2.1-4) OK gri(2.12.27-1) FTBFS (#991057) kst(2.0.8-4) OK labplot(2.8.2-1) OK libminc(2.4.03-3)OK libpdl-netcdf-perl (4.22-2) OK nco(5.0.1-1) OK ncview (2.1.8+ds-4) OK netcdf-cxx (4.3.1-3) OK netcdf-cxx-legacy (4.2-12) OK netcdf-fortran (4.5.3+ds-2) OK netcdf4-python (1.5.7-1) OK octave-netcdf (1.0.14-1)OK pymol (2.4.0+dfsg-2)OK r-cran-ncdf4 (1.17-2) OK r-cran-rnetcdf (2.5-2-1) OK ruby-netcdf(0.7.2-5) OK v-sim (3.7.2-8) OK abinit (9.2.2-1) OK cdftools (3.0.2-4) OK emoslib(2:4.5.9-7) OK etsf-io(1.0.4-5) OK ferret-vis (7.6.0-2) OK gmt(6.2.0+dfsg-1)OK gnudatalanguage(1.0.0-4) OK grass (7.8.5-2) OK harp (1.13-1) OK metkit (1.8.4-1) OK minc-tools (2.3.00+dfsg-6) OK ncl(6.6.2-8) FTBFS (#993992) oasis3 (3.mct+dfsg.121022-15)OK paraview (5.9.0-2) OK python-escript (5.6-3) OK vtk6 (6.3.0+dfsg2-8.1) OK vtk7 (7.1.1+dfsg2-10) OK vtk9 (9.0.1+dfsg1-8) OK lammps (20210122~gita77bb+ds1-2) OK magics++ (4.9.0-1) OK pyferret (7.6.3-3) OK qgis (3.16.10+dfsg-1) OK cdo(2.0.0~rc5-1) OK metview(5.13.0-1)OK Kind Regards, Bas --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2021-10-06 10:36:05 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2021-10-06 06:42:42, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > Testing still lacks a few rebuilt packages for this transition. > > > > labplot should migrated in two days. > > > > pymol will be rebuilt in unstable after it gets out the DELAYED > > according to #995666, although I don't see it at > > > > ftp://ftp.upload.debian.org/pub/UploadQueue/DELAYED/ > > You can find the deferred queue at https://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred.html > > Cheers > > > > > magics++ & metkit are blocked by eckit which is no longer built on 32bit > > architectures, and is waiting for ftpmaster to act on #993624. The old binaries have been removed from testing. Closing Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#993945: marked as done (transition: evolution-data-server)
Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2021 21:34:00 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#993945: transition: evolution-data-server has caused the Debian Bug report #993945, regarding transition: evolution-data-server to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 993945: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993945 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: moreinfo User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-evolution-data-server.html Control: block -1 by 992870 Control: block -1 by 993934 Control: block 991036 by -1 Control: block 993850 by -1 Another 6-month GNOME release cycle, another evolution-data-server ABI bump, you know how this works. This transition is not ready to go yet, so I'm marking it moreinfo. It should be done after the gnome-shell/mutter transition (#992870), and is entangled with libgweather (#993934); Jeremy Bicha recommended that we do libgweather first, or maybe they could go together if enough maintainer bandwidth is available. I am not an Evolution maintainer, and please don't assume I am a suitable contact person for this transition - I'm only opening the bug so that I can mark it as a blocker for issues that are fixed in GNOME 40 packages involved in this transition. Ben file: title = "evolution-data-server"; is_affected = .depends ~ /\b(libedataserver\-1\.2\-25|libedataserverui\-1\.2\-2)\b/ | .depends ~ /\b(libedataserver\-1\.2\-26|libedataserverui\-1\.2\-3)\b/; is_good = .depends ~ /\b(libedataserver\-1\.2\-26|libedataserverui\-1\.2\-3)\b/; is_bad = .depends ~ /\b(libedataserver\-1\.2\-25|libedataserverui\-1\.2\-2)\b/; --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2021-09-26 21:31:30 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-evolution-data-server.html > > On 2021-09-26 09:19:54 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-evolution-data-server.html > > > > This needs sourceful uploads of evolution-data-server, evolution, and > > evolution-ews. Then binNMUs for the rest. > > > > The libgweather transition completed. > > > > However, we probably want glib2.0 to migrate to testing first (now > > entangled with the libffi transition) since the rebuilds could easily > > end up with a dependency on the new glib. > > Please feel free to go ahead after glib2.0 migrated. The old binaries have been removed from testing. Closing Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#995743: RM: hardlink/0.3.2
Hi Chris, On 05-10-2021 00:17, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > please RM hardlink from testing, to allow util-linux to migrate. > src:util-linux now ships the hardlink program, and on upgrades hardlink > should get deconfigured/removed. See #992498 for additional background. Let's see if a rm hint works. I fear britney doesn't really understand the provides/conflicts/breaks combi to mean util-linux can replace it. Hence not closing this bug yet. Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#996086: marked as done (RM: pangox-compat/0.0.2-5.1)
Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2021 21:20:36 +0200 with message-id <02d3068d-c66e-df29-50e2-3d24efbbb...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#996086: RM: pangox-compat/0.0.2-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #996086, regarding RM: pangox-compat/0.0.2-5.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 996086: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996086 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm pangox-compat is dead upstream and should be removed from testing, or removed from Debian altogether (#947649), but it has been kept in testing by its high popcon score (the legacy libpango1.0-0 package depended on it, resulting in lots of installations). It can't be removed from unstable until drbd-doc stops depending on it or is removed (#993661), and then gtkmathview stops depending on it or is removed (#702011); but it can at least be removed from testing. smcv --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi Simon, On 11-10-2021 00:50, Simon McVittie wrote: > pangox-compat is dead upstream and should be removed from testing, or > removed from Debian altogether (#947649), but it has been kept in testing > by its high popcon score (the legacy libpango1.0-0 package depended on it, > resulting in lots of installations). Hint added. OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message ---
