Bug#1027935: marked as done (RM: ruby-bourne/1.6.0-3 ruby-mail-room/0.10.0+really0.0.9-2 ruby-terrapin/0.6.0-4)
Your message dated Thu, 5 Jan 2023 07:35:37 +0100 with message-id <73df9198-5f7e-f53c-b8ab-26809d9f6...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1027935: RM: ruby-bourne/1.6.0-3 ruby-mail-room/0.10.0+really0.0.9-2 ruby-terrapin/0.6.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1027935, regarding RM: ruby-bourne/1.6.0-3 ruby-mail-room/0.10.0+really0.0.9-2 ruby-terrapin/0.6.0-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1027935: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027935 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Please rm ruby-bourne from testing, as well as its two reverse depends (ruby-mail-room and ruby-terrapin). It will allow ruby-mocha to migrate to testing. ruby-bourne is unmaintained upstream and RC-buggy (#1027341). ruby-mail-room and ruby-terrapin are also RC buggy. They might still get fixed at some point, but it sounds better to let mocha (which is a rather core mocking library) migrate. Lucas --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi Lucas, On 04-01-2023 21:14, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Please rm ruby-bourne from testing, as well as its two reverse depends (ruby-mail-room and ruby-terrapin). It will allow ruby-mocha to migrate to testing. ruby-bourne is unmaintained upstream and RC-buggy (#1027341). ruby-mail-room and ruby-terrapin are also RC buggy. They might still get fixed at some point, but it sounds better to let mocha (which is a rather core mocking library) migrate. If I interpreted your request correctly, you didn't so much asked for the removal of the three ruby packages, but you wanted ruby-mocha not stalled on the autopkgtest regression. At this moment I preferred to hint ruby-mocha through and let autoremoval handle the removal as all three packages have RC bugs as you noted. For you the effect should be the same. Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message ---
Bug#1027959: transition: libkiwix
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: lego...@debian.org Hi, I'd like to do the transition for libkiwix (and sibling libzim) in time for bookworm, it's fully self-contained. I uploaded src:zimlib 8.1.0 to unstable last week, which unintentionally had a breaking change in it (sorry!). libkiwix 12.0.0 is waiting in experimental. Status of reverse dependencies for compatibility with new libkiwix+libzim: * zim-tools: needs binNUM for libzim 8.1.0 * python-libzim: fixed with 2.1.0, currently in unstable * kiwix-tools: fixed with 3.4.0, waiting in experimental * kiwix: fixed with 2.3.1, waiting in experimental Ben file: title = "libkiwix"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libkiwix11" | .depends ~ "libkiwix12"; is_good = .depends ~ "libkiwix12"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libkiwix11"; Thanks, -- Kunal
Processed: Re: Bug#1027853: transition: muparserx
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1027853 [release.debian.org] transition: muparserx Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1027853: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027853 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1027853: transition: muparserx
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Andreas On 2023-01-04 04:40:43 +0100, Andreas Bombe wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: mupars...@packages.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:muparserx > > This is still a package with a soname coupled to its release number, so > there isn't really anything significantly changed. > > It has genomicsdb, otb and qiskit-aer as rdepds and I successfully built > all three against the new version. For both genomicsdb and qiskit-aer > the build time testsuite completed without failures. otb does not appear > to have a testsuite. > > The auto-muparserx ben tracker appears correct. Please go ahead Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1027942: transition: poppler 22.12
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: popp...@packages.debain.org Control: block -1 by 1026040 Control: block -1 by 1026093 Poppler is now on a monthly release cycle. I request that we use poppler 22.12 for Debian 12 instead of poppler 22.08 from August. (This week, there was also a 23.01 release, but it's impractical for that update to be included in Debian 12.) I apologize for the late request. This transition is mostly done in Ubuntu, but completion is blocked there by the Qt transition and some other transitions. This transition will need a sourceful upload for dia and for ipe-tools. ipe-tools is fixed in Experimental. I can do NMUs for these 2 packages. inkscape fails to build on some architectures but that's not caused by the new poppler and the build failures didn't block the poppler 22.08 transition several months ago. Everything else should be binNMUable without an issue. This tracker is good: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-poppler.html Thank you, Jeremy Bicha
Processed: transition: poppler 22.12
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 1026040 Bug #1027942 [release.debian.org] transition: poppler 22.12 1027942 was not blocked by any bugs. 1027942 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1027942: 1026040 > block -1 by 1026093 Bug #1027942 [release.debian.org] transition: poppler 22.12 1027942 was blocked by: 1026040 1027942 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 1027942: 1026093 -- 1027942: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027942 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1027463: transition: clamav
On January 4, 2023 7:27:46 PM UTC, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: >Control: tags -1 confirmed > >Hi Scott > >On 2022-12-31 19:29:53 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: transition >> X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-clamav-devel.alioth-lists.debian.net >> >> As discussed in a separate email to the release team list yesterday, we, >> unfortunately have a need to do a late clamav transition. >> >> The clamav project now maintains specified releases with long term >> support. Currently we have 0.103 in stable/testing/unstable. We should >> be able to maintain clamav for the expected life of bullseye with 0.103. >> >> For bookworm we will need to transition to clamav 1.0/libclamav11 at >> some point and we believe it's better to do it now that during the >> freeze or even potentially after release. The move from 0.103 to 1.0 is >> more complicated that usual due to upstream switching from autorools to >> CMake and the introduction of Rust code into libclamav. >> >> The package is availalbe in experimental, but still needs some cleanup >> before it's ready for release. We will be working on this over then >> next couple of days and anticipate being ready for the transition >> mid-week. >> >> There are three reverse build-depends for libclamav-dev: >> >> * c-icap-modules >> * cyrus-imapd >> * pg-snakeoil >> >> I've test built all three with the clamav 1.0 packages in experimental >> with no issue. >> >> Additionally, there is libclamunrar in non-free that will also need to >> be updated. The clamav team will address that after the transition is >> done. > >Please go ahead. > >Cheers Thanks. Uploaded. Scott K
Bug#1027935: RM: ruby-bourne/1.6.0-3 ruby-mail-room/0.10.0+really0.0.9-2 ruby-terrapin/0.6.0-4
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Please rm ruby-bourne from testing, as well as its two reverse depends (ruby-mail-room and ruby-terrapin). It will allow ruby-mocha to migrate to testing. ruby-bourne is unmaintained upstream and RC-buggy (#1027341). ruby-mail-room and ruby-terrapin are also RC buggy. They might still get fixed at some point, but it sounds better to let mocha (which is a rather core mocking library) migrate. Lucas
Bug#1026254: Transition KDE PIM 22.12
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Patrick On 2022-12-30 02:32:48 +0100, Patrick Franz wrote: > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > > Hi, > > On Sun, 18 Dec 2022 13:01:08 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher > > Please remove the moreinfo tag once the transition is staged in > > experimental. > > KDE PIM was uploaded to experimental a week ago and has been built > successfully on all architectures except s390x where some packages are > still queued. However, I don't a see a reason why the builds should > fail. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Processed: Re: Bug#1026254: Transition KDE PIM 22.12
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1026254 [release.debian.org] Transition KDE PIM 22.12 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1026254: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026254 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1027463: transition: clamav
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1027463 [release.debian.org] transition: clamav Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1027463: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027463 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1027463: transition: clamav
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Scott On 2022-12-31 19:29:53 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-clamav-devel.alioth-lists.debian.net > > As discussed in a separate email to the release team list yesterday, we, > unfortunately have a need to do a late clamav transition. > > The clamav project now maintains specified releases with long term > support. Currently we have 0.103 in stable/testing/unstable. We should > be able to maintain clamav for the expected life of bullseye with 0.103. > > For bookworm we will need to transition to clamav 1.0/libclamav11 at > some point and we believe it's better to do it now that during the > freeze or even potentially after release. The move from 0.103 to 1.0 is > more complicated that usual due to upstream switching from autorools to > CMake and the introduction of Rust code into libclamav. > > The package is availalbe in experimental, but still needs some cleanup > before it's ready for release. We will be working on this over then > next couple of days and anticipate being ready for the transition > mid-week. > > There are three reverse build-depends for libclamav-dev: > > * c-icap-modules > * cyrus-imapd > * pg-snakeoil > > I've test built all three with the clamav 1.0 packages in experimental > with no issue. > > Additionally, there is libclamunrar in non-free that will also need to > be updated. The clamav team will address that after the transition is > done. Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1025056: marked as done (transition: numerical library transition: hypre / petsc / slepc / sundials)
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jan 2023 19:41:03 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1025056: transition: numerical library transition: hypre / petsc / slepc / sundials has caused the Debian Bug report #1025056, regarding transition: numerical library transition: hypre / petsc / slepc / sundials to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1025056: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025056 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: Anton Gladky We'd like to update the numerical library stack in time for the new stable release. Affected libraries are hypre2.25.0 -> 2.26.0 petsc/slepc3.17 -> 3.18 sundials 5.8.0 -> 6.4.1 Autotransitions are already generated: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-hypre.html https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-petsc.html https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-slepc.html https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-sundials.html Most of the dependent packages are under our control (Debian Science Team), octave is the main one outside our team. Updates have built fine in experimental and dependent packages are building successfully against them. Anton Gladky will upload the sundials update. Ben file: title = "numerical library transition: hypre / petsc / slepc / sundials"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libpetsc-real3.17" | .depends ~ "libpetsc-real3.18"; is_good = .depends ~ "libpetsc-real3.18"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libpetsc-real3.17"; etc --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2023-01-02 17:42:29 +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > Hi Drew > > On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 at 12:12, Drew Parsons wrote: > > Looks like deal.ii needs another binNMU against sundials 6.4.1+dfsg1-3 > > to catch the new libsundials-nvecparallel-mpi6 > > A binNMU was scheduled for 6.4.1+dfsg1-2 [1]. > > -3 shouldn't be relevant for building, however we hit a 'illegal > instruction' on the arm64 buildds. The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Bug#1027797: transition: aac-tactics 8.17.0-1
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Julien On 2023-01-03 14:33:32 +0100, julien.pu...@gmail.com wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: jpu...@debian.org > X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers > > > A new upstream version of aac-tactics is out ; it requires rebuilding a > depending package: > > nmu coq-relation-algebra_1.7.8-1+b3 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild because of > upload of aac-tactics=8.17.0-1' > dw coq-relation-algebra_1.7.8-1+b3 . ANY . -m 'aac-tactics >= 8.17.0- > 1' > > > I'm waiting for the "go!" signal to upload aac-tactics 8.17.0-1. Please go ahead Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Processed: Re: Bug#1027746: transition: log4cxx
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1027746 [release.debian.org] transition: log4cxx Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1027746: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027746 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1027797: transition: aac-tactics 8.17.0-1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1027797 [release.debian.org] transition: aac-tactics 8.17.0-1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1027797: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027797 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1027746: transition: log4cxx
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Tobias On 2023-01-02 19:21:01 +0100, Tobias Frost wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: log4...@packages.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:log4cxx > > Hi, > > I'm currently preparing for log4cxx13 -> log4cxx15 transition. > (SO_NAME 14 had been skipped by upstream) > > All it's r-depends builds fine, and there are only three, I anticipate > a smooth transition: > > R-Dependees are: > solarpowerlog ✔ > ros-rosconsole ✔ > ros-ros-comm ✔ Please go ahead. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1027127: marked as done (transition: zxing-cpp)
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jan 2023 19:40:06 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1027127: transition: zxing-cpp has caused the Debian Bug report #1027127, regarding transition: zxing-cpp to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1027127: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027127 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: zxing-...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:zxing-cpp Hi, the gstreamer 1.22 release as well as mediastreamer2 5.2 need zxing-cpp version 1.4. Currently there is 1.2 in unstable and 1.4 in experimental. Boyuan Yang, the maintainer of zxing-cpp told me to take care of this transition as they lack the time right now to to so themselves. I have rebuilt the reverse dependencies of libzxing-dev as listed here: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-zxing-cpp.html The one that FTBFS is libreoffice for which I submitted a bug here that is already fixed in unstable: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027048 Is it too late before the freeze to do this? Thanks! cheers, josch Ben file: title = "zxing-cpp"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libzxingcore1" | .depends ~ "libzxing2"; is_good = .depends ~ "libzxing2"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libzxingcore1"; --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2022-12-28 08:41:25 +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: zxing-...@packages.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:zxing-cpp > > Hi, > > the gstreamer 1.22 release as well as mediastreamer2 5.2 need zxing-cpp > version 1.4. Currently there is 1.2 in unstable and 1.4 in experimental. > Boyuan Yang, the maintainer of zxing-cpp told me to take care of this > transition as they lack the time right now to to so themselves. > > I have rebuilt the reverse dependencies of libzxing-dev as listed here: > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-zxing-cpp.html > > The one that FTBFS is libreoffice for which I submitted a bug here that > is already fixed in unstable: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027048 > > Is it too late before the freeze to do this? > > Thanks! It's done. Closing. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Bug#1027033: marked as done (transition: libsecp256k1)
Your message dated Wed, 4 Jan 2023 19:40:25 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1027033: transition: libsecp256k1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1027033, regarding transition: libsecp256k1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1027033: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027033 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition libsecp256k1 has a SONAME bump in 0.2.0-1 (experimental). The only reverse dependency that needs a fix for the transition is electrum (already uploaded to experimental). The other reverse dependencies bitcoin and ring FTBFS currently due to other issues. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2022-12-27 12:27:16 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > Hi Bastian > > On 2022-12-26 19:54:59 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > libsecp256k1 has a SONAME bump in 0.2.0-1 (experimental). > > The only reverse dependency that needs a fix for the transition is electrum > > (already uploaded to experimental). > > The other reverse dependencies bitcoin and ring FTBFS currently due to > > other issues. > > Please go ahead. The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---
Bug#1027127: transition: zxing-cpp
Hi, On 03-01-2023 17:29, Andreas Beckmann wrote: nmu mediastreamer2_1:5.2.0+dfsg-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against libzxing2" scheduled. Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: erlang_23.2.6+dfsg-1+deb11u1_arm64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: erlang_23.2.6+dfsg-1+deb11u1_armhf-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: erlang_23.2.6+dfsg-1+deb11u1_mips64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: erlang_23.2.6+dfsg-1+deb11u1_mipsel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: erlang_23.2.6+dfsg-1+deb11u1_s390x-buildd.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: erlang_23.2.6+dfsg-1+deb11u1_amd64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: erlang_23.2.6+dfsg-1+deb11u1_armel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: erlang_23.2.6+dfsg-1+deb11u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: erlang_23.2.6+dfsg-1+deb11u1_all-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: erlang_23.2.6+dfsg-1+deb11u1_i386-buildd.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: cwltool_3.0.20210124104916-3+deb11u1_all-buildd.changes ACCEPT
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: chromium_108.0.5359.124-1~deb11u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: chromium_108.0.5359.124-1~deb11u1_all-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: chromium_108.0.5359.124-1~deb11u1_amd64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: chromium_108.0.5359.124-1~deb11u1_arm64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: chromium_108.0.5359.124-1~deb11u1_armhf-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: chromium_108.0.5359.124-1~deb11u1_i386-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: chromium_108.0.5359.124-1~deb11u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: cwltool_3.0.20210124104916-3+deb11u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: erlang_23.2.6+dfsg-1+deb11u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gerbv_2.7.0-2+deb11u2_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gerbv_2.7.0-2+deb11u2_amd64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gerbv_2.7.0-2+deb11u2_arm64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gerbv_2.7.0-2+deb11u2_armel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gerbv_2.7.0-2+deb11u2_armhf-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gerbv_2.7.0-2+deb11u2_i386-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gerbv_2.7.0-2+deb11u2_mips64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gerbv_2.7.0-2+deb11u2_mipsel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gerbv_2.7.0-2+deb11u2_ppc64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: gerbv_2.7.0-2+deb11u2_s390x-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libcommons-net-java_3.6-1+deb11u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libcommons-net-java_3.6-1+deb11u1_all-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby-image-processing_1.10.3-1+deb11u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: ruby-image-processing_1.10.3-1+deb11u1_all-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_all-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_amd64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_arm64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_armel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_armhf-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_i386-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_mips64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_mipsel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: webkit2gtk_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_s390x-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wpewebkit_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_source.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wpewebkit_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_all-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wpewebkit_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_amd64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wpewebkit_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_arm64-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wpewebkit_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_armel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wpewebkit_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_armhf-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wpewebkit_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_i386-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wpewebkit_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_mips64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wpewebkit_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_mipsel-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wpewebkit_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: wpewebkit_2.38.3-1~deb11u1_s390x-buildd.changes ACCEPT
Processed: cwltool 3.0.20210124104916-3+deb11u1 flagged for acceptance
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package release.debian.org Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'release.debian.org' Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org' > tags 1025329 = bullseye pending Bug #1025329 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package cwltool/3.0.20210124104916-3+deb11u1 Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1025329: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1025329 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1025329: cwltool 3.0.20210124104916-3+deb11u1 flagged for acceptance
package release.debian.org tags 1025329 = bullseye pending thanks Hi, The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye. Thanks for your contribution! Upload details == Package: cwltool Version: 3.0.20210124104916-3+deb11u1 Explanation: add missing dependency on python3-distutils
Processed: Re: Bug#1027856: RM: wesnoth-1.14/1:1.14.17-2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1027856 RM: wesnoth-1.14 -- ROM; Package is superseded by wesnoth-1.16 Bug #1027856 [release.debian.org] RM: wesnoth-1.14/1:1.14.17-2 Changed Bug title to 'RM: wesnoth-1.14 -- ROM; Package is superseded by wesnoth-1.16' from 'RM: wesnoth-1.14/1:1.14.17-2'. > reassign 1027856 ftp.debian.org Bug #1027856 [release.debian.org] RM: wesnoth-1.14 -- ROM; Package is superseded by wesnoth-1.16 Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1027856 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1027856 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1027856: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027856 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1027856: RM: wesnoth-1.14/1:1.14.17-2
retitle 1027856 RM: wesnoth-1.14 -- ROM; Package is superseded by wesnoth-1.16 reassign 1027856 ftp.debian.org thanks On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 12:11 AM Paul Gevers wrote: > > Hi Vincent, > > On 04-01-2023 07:47, Vincent Cheng wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: rm > > > > src:wesnoth-1.14 has been superseded by wesnoth-1.16; please remove the > > former > > from the archive. Thanks! > > If you want it removed from the archive (which sounds logical) than the > bug should be reassigned to ftp.debian.org (and probably the title > should be adapted to their format). Filing an RM bug against > release.debian.org is what you should do if you want/need the package to > remain in unstable for whatever reason but the package should be removed > from testing (or stable). I think that's not what you meant, right? Whoops, thanks for pointing me in the right direction! Regards, Vincent
Processed: Fwd: Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 1027728 ftp.debian.org Bug #1027728 [release.debian.org] RM: monster-masher -- ROM; unmaintained upstream; last gnomecanvasmm rdep Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1027728 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1027728 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1027728: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027728 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1027856: RM: wesnoth-1.14/1:1.14.17-2
Hi Vincent, On 04-01-2023 07:47, Vincent Cheng wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm src:wesnoth-1.14 has been superseded by wesnoth-1.16; please remove the former from the archive. Thanks! If you want it removed from the archive (which sounds logical) than the bug should be reassigned to ftp.debian.org (and probably the title should be adapted to their format). Filing an RM bug against release.debian.org is what you should do if you want/need the package to remain in unstable for whatever reason but the package should be removed from testing (or stable). I think that's not what you meant, right? Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
