Bug#1040124: bookworm-pu: package mate-control-center/1.26.0-2+deb12u1

2023-07-01 Thread Mike Gabriel
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: mate-control-cen...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:mate-control-center

[ Reason ]
Various memleaks have been resolved plus a non-operational button
dialog unlock button in mate-time-admin.

[ Impact ]
Memory management has been improved.

[ Tests ]
Manual smoke tests on the local system.

[ Risks ]
Regressions in MATE's control center. Esp. in:

  * mouse settings UI
  * keyboard properties UI
  * default application properties UI
  * appearance settings UI
  * MATE theme settings UI
  * MATE keybindings UI
  * mate-time-admin

[ Checklist ]
  [x] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [x] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
  [x] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable

[ Changes ]
(Explain *all* the changes)

+  [ Martin Wimpress ]
+  * debian/patches:
++ Add 2002-remove_obsolete_lock_button.patch (LP: #1955339)

With recent versions of systemd, polkit is no longer used to request
authentication from users. Regular users can use `timedatectl` to modify
time without authentication,the lock button can be removed.

+  [ Mike Gabriel ]
+  * debian/patches:
++ Add various memleak fix patches (0007, 0008, 0009, 0010, 0011, 0013, 
0014,
++ 0016 and 0017). Cherry-picked from 1.26.1 upstream release. (Closes:
+  #1040019).

Bunch of memleaks fixes (see above for list of subcomponents).

[ Other info ]
None.
diff -Nru mate-control-center-1.26.0/debian/changelog 
mate-control-center-1.26.0/debian/changelog
--- mate-control-center-1.26.0/debian/changelog 2021-12-13 17:32:45.0 
+0100
+++ mate-control-center-1.26.0/debian/changelog 2023-07-01 07:28:02.0 
+0200
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+mate-control-center (1.26.0-2+deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium
+
+  [ Martin Wimpress ]
+  * debian/patches:
++ Add 2002-remove_obsolete_lock_button.patch (LP: #1955339)
+
+  [ Mike Gabriel ]
+  * debian/patches:
++ Add various memleak fix patches (0007, 0008, 0009, 0010, 0011, 0013, 
0014,
++ 0016 and 0017). Cherry-picked from 1.26.1 upstream release. (Closes:
+  #1040019).
+
+ -- Mike Gabriel   Sat, 01 Jul 2023 07:28:02 +0200
+
 mate-control-center (1.26.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * debian/control:
diff -Nru 
mate-control-center-1.26.0/debian/patches/0007-mouse-fix-memory-leak.patch 
mate-control-center-1.26.0/debian/patches/0007-mouse-fix-memory-leak.patch
--- mate-control-center-1.26.0/debian/patches/0007-mouse-fix-memory-leak.patch  
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ mate-control-center-1.26.0/debian/patches/0007-mouse-fix-memory-leak.patch  
2023-07-01 07:24:51.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+From e9aa9d485e8408a2f113ece4eca54f202962fb89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: rbuj 
+Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:15:31 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH 07/20] mouse: fix memory leak
+
+Signed-off-by: Mike Gabriel 
+---
+ capplets/mouse/mate-mouse-properties.c | 1 +
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
+
+diff --git a/capplets/mouse/mate-mouse-properties.c 
b/capplets/mouse/mate-mouse-properties.c
+index e057f7a..7ca4cf1 100644
+--- a/capplets/mouse/mate-mouse-properties.c
 b/capplets/mouse/mate-mouse-properties.c
+@@ -405,6 +405,7 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
+   context = g_option_context_new (_("- MATE Mouse Preferences"));
+   g_option_context_add_main_entries (context, cap_options, 
GETTEXT_PACKAGE);
+   capplet_init (context, , );
++  g_option_context_free (context);
+ 
+   activate_settings_daemon ();
+ 
+-- 
+2.39.2
+
diff -Nru 
mate-control-center-1.26.0/debian/patches/0008-keyboard-fix-memory-leak.patch 
mate-control-center-1.26.0/debian/patches/0008-keyboard-fix-memory-leak.patch
--- 
mate-control-center-1.26.0/debian/patches/0008-keyboard-fix-memory-leak.patch   
1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ 
mate-control-center-1.26.0/debian/patches/0008-keyboard-fix-memory-leak.patch   
2023-07-01 07:24:51.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+From e5952471d2964ddb815ca7e40380f3472cc338a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: rbuj 
+Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 13:18:23 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH 08/20] keyboard: fix memory leak
+
+Signed-off-by: Mike Gabriel 
+---
+ capplets/keyboard/mate-keyboard-properties.c | 1 +
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
+
+diff --git a/capplets/keyboard/mate-keyboard-properties.c 
b/capplets/keyboard/mate-keyboard-properties.c
+index ff389cf..4152759 100644
+--- a/capplets/keyboard/mate-keyboard-properties.c
 b/capplets/keyboard/mate-keyboard-properties.c
+@@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
+  GETTEXT_PACKAGE);
+ 
+   capplet_init (context, , );
++  g_option_context_free (context);
+ 
+   activate_settings_daemon ();
+ 
+-- 
+2.39.2
+
diff -Nru 
mate-control-center-1.26.0/debian/patches/0009-mate-da-capplet-fix-memory-leak.patch
 

Processed: bookworm-pu: package mate-control-center/1.26.0-2+deb12u1

2023-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> affects -1 + src:mate-control-center
Bug #1040124 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package 
mate-control-center/1.26.0-2+deb12u1
Added indication that 1040124 affects src:mate-control-center

-- 
1040124: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040124
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



NEW changes in stable-new

2023-07-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mailman3_3.3.8-2~deb12u1_all-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT



Bug#1040001: transition: r-base

2023-07-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2023-07-01 at 14:29 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:

> I've filed Bug#1040038 with the patch for r-graphics-api and updated
> branch r-api-graphic branch of dh-r[1] to match the suggested patch
> immediately once uploaded.

I've sent a suggestion to bug #1040038 for not hard-coding the API
number and extracting it from the header instead. Dirk also posted
an R-native version of what I suggested to the bug too.

The dh-r r-api-graphic branch also hard-codes the list of packages that
should get the graphics API dependency but that list will need manual
maintenance as packages add/drop use of R_GE_checkVersionOrDie.

The objdump tool can export the list of dynamically imported symbols,
that can be searched for use of R_GE_checkVersionOrDie and then if it
is, assume that it is called with R_GE_version and add the dependency.

   $ objdump -T debian/*/usr/lib/R/site-library/*/libs/*.so | grep 
R_GE_checkVersionOrDie
     DF *UND*     Base    
R_GE_checkVersionOrDie

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


NEW changes in stable-new

2023-07-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mailman3_3.3.8-2~deb12u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT



Processed: mailman3 3.3.8-2~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance

2023-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'

> tags 1038906 = bookworm pending
Bug #1038906 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package mailman3/3.3.8-1
Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1038906: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038906
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1038906: mailman3 3.3.8-2~deb12u1 flagged for acceptance

2023-07-01 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
package release.debian.org
tags 1038906 = bookworm pending
thanks

Hi,

The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into 
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.

Thanks for your contribution!

Upload details
==

Package: mailman3
Version: 3.3.8-2~deb12u1

Explanation: 



Processed: block 1028132 with 1040001

2023-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 1028132 with 1040001
Bug #1028132 [release.debian.org] transition: hunspell
1028132 was blocked by: 1028124
1028132 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1028132: 1040001
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1028132: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028132
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1039622: bookworm-pu: package nvidia-cuda-toolkit/11.8.0-5~deb12u1

2023-07-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
bunk@coccia:~$ cat 
/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/queue/reject/nvidia-cuda-toolkit_11.8.0-5~deb12u1_amd64-buildd.changes.reason

Version check failed:
Your upload included the binary package nvidia-openjdk-8-jre, version 
9.+8u372-ga-1~11.8.0-5~deb12u1, for amd64,
however experimental already has version 9.+8u362-ga-4~12.0.0-1.
Uploads to proposed-updates must have a lower version than present in 
experimental.
bunk@coccia:~$ 


That's a surprising reject reason, but a give-back might work if you
update the version in experimental.


cu
Adrian



NEW changes in stable-new

2023-07-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: 
mate-control-center_1.26.0-2+deb12u1_s390x-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT



Bug#1038820: transition: glibc 2.37

2023-07-01 Thread Matthias Klose

uploaded

On 01.07.23 16:55, Aurelien Jarno wrote:

Hi Matthias,

On 2023-07-01 14:16, Aurelien Jarno wrote:

On 2023-07-01 10:14, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:

Control: forwarded -1 
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.37.html
Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 2023-06-21 20:53:54 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gl...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:glibc

Dear release team,

I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.37. It has been
available in experimental for a bit more than a month and does not have
any known issue. It has been built successfully on all release
architectures and many ports architectures (technically 2.37-2 hasn't
been built yet on mipsel and mips64el due to the buildds lagging, but
2.37-1 has been built successfully).


Please go ahead.


Thanks, I have just uploaded it.


The arch:all build finished and got uploaded, so the glibc-source
package is now available in the archive. Matthias, could you please
upload cross-toolchain-base and cross-toolchain-base-ports using glibc
2.37?

Thanks,
Aurelien





NEW changes in stable-new

2023-07-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mate-control-center_1.26.0-2+deb12u1_all-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: 
mate-control-center_1.26.0-2+deb12u1_amd64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: 
mate-control-center_1.26.0-2+deb12u1_arm64-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: 
mate-control-center_1.26.0-2+deb12u1_armel-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: 
mate-control-center_1.26.0-2+deb12u1_armhf-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: 
mate-control-center_1.26.0-2+deb12u1_i386-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: 
mate-control-center_1.26.0-2+deb12u1_mips64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: 
mate-control-center_1.26.0-2+deb12u1_mipsel-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: 
mate-control-center_1.26.0-2+deb12u1_ppc64el-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: vm_8.2.0b-8+deb12u1_all-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT



Bug#1040001: transition: r-base

2023-07-01 Thread Paul Gevers

Hi Dirk,

On 01-07-2023 16:47, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:

So per upstream ("R Core" for short), this is clearly on the package
side. There is no ABI/API incompatibility: R offers graphics functions new
functionality, to use it one needs a rebuild _if a package decides to stop
and die on mismatch_.

I so filed three bug reports last weekend against three such packages
requesting a simple rebuild as that is in fact all it takes. (And
missed one that was added.)  These were quickly rebuilt.


While this may be true, in Debian we require that such packages express 
this relation. I understand that that's what we achieve with the 
proposal of Andreas. "Just rebuilding" is often the wrong solution (in 
Debian) if it doesn't express the relation properly.



So let me know what you think.  If the release team thinks we must rebuild
across 1100 r-* packages (of which likely 400-500 are Architecture: any)
then I will of course work with you.


I recognize that at this moment we might not need it to straighten 
things out, because of all the new version uploads, but I believe it's 
the right solution for the future, as this seems to be a recurring topic.


Paul


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#1040041: bookworm-pu: package dnf/4.14.0-3+deb12u1

2023-07-01 Thread Frédéric Pierret
Hello Aron,
I'm sorry for the delay, I'm just getting out of Holidays and other duties. If 
anything should be done, let me know.

Also, I rely a lot on Holger for pushing stuff, and I need to candidate for 
DM/DD, just need to find time to do that.

Best regards,
Frédéric

Le 1 juillet 2023 14:13:10 UTC, Aron Xu  a écrit :
>Package: release.debian.org
>Severity: normal
>Tags: bookworm
>User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>Usertags: pu
>X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org
>
>Hi,
>
>[ Reason ]
>Fix bug in stable release affecting dependent package (Bug #1034828,
>affecting src:dnf-plugins-core).
>
>[ Impact ]
>Unfixed bug, dnf-plugins-core will not work with default configuration.
>
>[ Tests ]
>dnf has a testsuite, run at build time.
>
>[ Risks ]
>Only change defaults to Debian's python dist-packages path, risk is minimal.
>
>[ Checklist ]
>  [x] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
>  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
>  [x] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
>  [x]  the issue is verified as fixed in unstable
>
>The proposed debdiff is identical to the version in unstable
>(4.14.0-4) except filtering out an indentation change in d/rules.
>
>[ Changes ]
>dnf encodes PYTNON_INSTALL_DIR into it's PLUGINPATH during build,
>which is not desired Debian's dist-packages path, thus packaged
>plugins are not found. This update changes it to a value corrospond to
>Debian defaults.
>
>Regards,
>Aron


Bug#1038820: transition: glibc 2.37

2023-07-01 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi Matthias,

On 2023-07-01 14:16, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2023-07-01 10:14, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: forwarded -1 
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.37.html
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> > 
> > On 2023-06-21 20:53:54 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: transition
> > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gl...@lists.debian.org
> > > Control: affects -1 + src:glibc
> > > 
> > > Dear release team,
> > > 
> > > I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.37. It has been
> > > available in experimental for a bit more than a month and does not have
> > > any known issue. It has been built successfully on all release
> > > architectures and many ports architectures (technically 2.37-2 hasn't
> > > been built yet on mipsel and mips64el due to the buildds lagging, but
> > > 2.37-1 has been built successfully).
> > 
> > Please go ahead.
> 
> Thanks, I have just uploaded it.

The arch:all build finished and got uploaded, so the glibc-source
package is now available in the archive. Matthias, could you please
upload cross-toolchain-base and cross-toolchain-base-ports using glibc
2.37?

Thanks,
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net



Bug#1040041: bookworm-pu: package dnf/4.14.0-3+deb12u1

2023-07-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed

On Sat, 2023-07-01 at 22:13 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> Fix bug in stable release affecting dependent package (Bug #1034828,
> affecting src:dnf-plugins-core).
> 

We generally prefer codenames - i.e. "bookworm" - rather than suites
(i.e. "stable") in changelogs.

Please go ahead.

Regards,

Adam



Bug#1040001: transition: r-base

2023-07-01 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel


This is not a bug in r-base, and does not warrant a transition.

I have written at some length about it, and (if I find some time) will expand
on it in blog post. I will also try to coordinate with upstream.

In short, R header GraphicsEngine.h [1] defines an integer constant declaring
the current versions capabilities.  Graphics device packages can then opt
into what they support using conditional code.  Or they can opt into checking
and aborting on any mismatch via R_GE_checkVersionOrDie (for 
'R_GraphicsEngine_*)

void R_GE_checkVersionOrDie(int version)
{
if (version != R_GE_version)
error(_("Graphics API version mismatch"));
}

Which some packages do. Note that the packages _load_ and _function_ (in a
limited sense).  They "simply" do not act as a graphics device, and alert the
user to rebuild the package.

So per upstream ("R Core" for short), this is clearly on the package
side. There is no ABI/API incompatibility: R offers graphics functions new
functionality, to use it one needs a rebuild _if a package decides to stop
and die on mismatch_.

I so filed three bug reports last weekend against three such packages
requesting a simple rebuild as that is in fact all it takes. (And
missed one that was added.)  These were quickly rebuilt.

And as a consequence the 'excuses' list for r-base is shrinking now just as
one could expect [3]. In particular a number of packages from the ggplot2
complex are now all green ... with the exception of s390x where eg ragg (used
often in unit tests) is awaiting a rebuild [4]. Once s390x rebuilds those
packages will turn green leading into to their dependents turning green/

So in short, in my view as maintainer, a transition is overkill and a waste
of resources, cpu cycles and otherwise. I am rather confident it will
straighten itself out.  (There may still be other issues with the
BioConductor release transition but I also expect those to be package-caused
and solvable.)

So let me know what you think.  If the release team thinks we must rebuild
across 1100 r-* packages (of which likely 400-500 are Architecture: any)
then I will of course work with you.

But I maintain that it is not caused by the package, and not needed, as it is
a set of client-package-local differences these packages opt-in upstream and
which are solvable with a simple rebuild of those packages.  Now, I
understand that _for simplicity_ we want to use this very blunt tool. But I
am old enough to remember that we also value engineering excellence.  As
there is no need for brute force, I advocate against it. No more, no less.

Cheers, Dirk




[1] For us at /usr/share/R/include/R_ext/GraphicsEngine.h
[2] In the sources at src/main/engine.c
[3] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=r-base
[4] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=r-cran-ragg

-- 
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#1040041: bookworm-pu: package dnf/4.14.0-3+deb12u1

2023-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #1040041 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package dnf/4.14.0-3+deb12u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
1040041: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040041
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1040041: bookworm-pu: package dnf/4.14.0-3+deb12u1

2023-07-01 Thread Aron Xu
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org

Hi,

[ Reason ]
Fix bug in stable release affecting dependent package (Bug #1034828,
affecting src:dnf-plugins-core).

[ Impact ]
Unfixed bug, dnf-plugins-core will not work with default configuration.

[ Tests ]
dnf has a testsuite, run at build time.

[ Risks ]
Only change defaults to Debian's python dist-packages path, risk is minimal.

[ Checklist ]
  [x] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [x] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
  [x]  the issue is verified as fixed in unstable

The proposed debdiff is identical to the version in unstable
(4.14.0-4) except filtering out an indentation change in d/rules.

[ Changes ]
dnf encodes PYTNON_INSTALL_DIR into it's PLUGINPATH during build,
which is not desired Debian's dist-packages path, thus packaged
plugins are not found. This update changes it to a value corrospond to
Debian defaults.

Regards,
Aron


dnf_4.14.0-3+deb12u1.debdiff
Description: Binary data


Bug#1040001: transition: r-base

2023-07-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again,

just a status update:

Am Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 01:45:11PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> 
> I think my piece is ready.  We just need to decide about a proper name
> of the virtual package.  I'll inject this into my proof of concept
> change of dh-r.  Than Dirk needs to upload another r-base package
> containing the r-graphics-api-VERSION.  This should not be a hard thing
> to do - Dirk just stayed silent about this change since we are
> discussing it.

I've filed Bug#1040038 with the patch for r-graphics-api and updated
branch r-api-graphic branch of dh-r[1] to match the suggested patch
immediately once uploaded.
 
Kind regards
   Andreas. 

[1] 
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/dh-r/-/tree/r-api-graphic?ref_type=heads 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Bug#1038820: transition: glibc 2.37

2023-07-01 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi Sebastian,

On 2023-07-01 10:14, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1 
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.37.html
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 2023-06-21 20:53:54 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gl...@lists.debian.org
> > Control: affects -1 + src:glibc
> > 
> > Dear release team,
> > 
> > I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.37. It has been
> > available in experimental for a bit more than a month and does not have
> > any known issue. It has been built successfully on all release
> > architectures and many ports architectures (technically 2.37-2 hasn't
> > been built yet on mipsel and mips64el due to the buildds lagging, but
> > 2.37-1 has been built successfully).
> 
> Please go ahead.

Thanks, I have just uploaded it.

Cheers,
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net



Bug#1040001: transition: r-base

2023-07-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul,

Am Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 07:48:16AM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> Anytime is good to ask for a transition, particularly when the transition is
> already ongoing.

:-)
 
> I don't think it should surprise anyone that we prefer it to be done right.
> Our preference is for option 1.

Thanks for confirming.

> However, if you can't get the pieces for
> that option in place in a reasonable time (say, a week or two, take some
> time to try),

I think my piece is ready.  We just need to decide about a proper name
of the virtual package.  I'll inject this into my proof of concept
change of dh-r.  Than Dirk needs to upload another r-base package
containing the r-graphics-api-VERSION.  This should not be a hard thing
to do - Dirk just stayed silent about this change since we are
discussing it.

> then we prefer to get *this* transition out of the way by
> means of option 2.

I personally think that we are in a good situation in the beginning of
the release cycle to do things right, which means option 1.  But it
depends from the r-base maintainer to cooperate here.

> I don't think it's in anybodies interest to waste time on
> option 3.

ACK.  I told Bas so who had spent quite some time to file bugs against
lots of r-cran-* packages which are all a consequence of the
not-yet-transition.
 
> > Sorry that this transition bug is that complex.  I would have loved if
> > it would went more coordinated but unfortunately that's not in my hands
> > and I simply try to reassemble the pieces.
> 
> Thanks for communicating with us, much appreciated.

Its always a pleasure to communicate with you. ;-)
 
> I'll try to set a placeholder transition tracker up soon; for now, by lack
> of something better, will reflect option 2. We can update that once we have
> the pieces for option 1.

Thanks a lot

   Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de



Processed: vm 8.2.0b-8+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance

2023-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'

> tags 1040033 = bookworm pending
Bug #1040033 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package vm/8.2.0b-8+deb12u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
1040033: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040033
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1040033: vm 8.2.0b-8+deb12u1 flagged for acceptance

2023-07-01 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
package release.debian.org
tags 1040033 = bookworm pending
thanks

Hi,

The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance
into the proposed-updates queue for Debian ${codename}.

Thanks for your contribution!

Upload details
==

Package: vm
Version: 8.2.0b-8+deb12u1

Explanation: disable byte compilation



NEW changes in stable-new

2023-07-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: mate-control-center_1.26.0-2+deb12u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: vm_8.2.0b-8+deb12u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT



Bug#1039867: marked as done (release.debian.org: Site uses old favicon.ico)

2023-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 1 Jul 2023 12:00:52 +0200
with message-id <5bef42d8-5bfe-3ea0-0776-2acea3912...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1039867: release.debian.org: Site uses old favicon.ico
has caused the Debian Bug report #1039867,
regarding release.debian.org: Site uses old favicon.ico
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1039867: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039867
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: nicholaschasti...@gmail.com

Hi,

the site https://release.debian.org uses an old version
of the debian favicon.ico that renders poorly on dark
backgrounds. Please use the same favicon.ico as https://www.debian.org

Note that this is also a problem on https://backports.debian.org and
https://search.debian.org. I have already attempted to alert the relevant
people for those sites.

Regards,

Nick.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Hi,

On 29-06-2023 03:39, Nick Hastings wrote:

Please use the same favicon.ico as https://www.debian.org


Done. Please verify after 10:30 UTC today.

Paul


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---


Processed: bookworm-pu: package vm/8.2.0b-8+deb12u1

2023-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> affects -1 + src:vm
Bug #1040033 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package vm/8.2.0b-8+deb12u1
Added indication that 1040033 affects src:vm

-- 
1040033: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040033
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Processed: Re: Bug#1038933: transition: octave

2023-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1038933 [release.debian.org] transition: octave
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/octave-58.html
Bug #1038933 [release.debian.org] transition: octave
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/octave-58.html'.

-- 
1038933: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038933
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1038933: transition: octave

2023-07-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/octave-58.html

On 2023-06-23 10:32:52 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: oct...@packages.debian.org, debian-oct...@lists.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:octave
> 
> Dear Release Team,
> 
> Please schedule a transition for the latest major upstream version of Octave,
> version 8. All the arch:any Octave addons need to be rebuild.

Please go ahead.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher



Processed: Re: Bug#1038820: transition: glibc 2.37

2023-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.37.html
Bug #1038820 [release.debian.org] transition: glibc 2.37
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.37.html'.
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1038820 [release.debian.org] transition: glibc 2.37
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
1038820: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038820
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1038820: transition: glibc 2.37

2023-07-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: forwarded -1 
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.37.html
Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 2023-06-21 20:53:54 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gl...@lists.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:glibc
> 
> Dear release team,
> 
> I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.37. It has been
> available in experimental for a bit more than a month and does not have
> any known issue. It has been built successfully on all release
> architectures and many ports architectures (technically 2.37-2 hasn't
> been built yet on mipsel and mips64el due to the buildds lagging, but
> 2.37-1 has been built successfully).

Please go ahead.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher



Bug#1039484: marked as done (transition: gpsd)

2023-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 1 Jul 2023 10:00:14 +0200
with message-id 
and subject line Re: Bug#1039484: transition: gpsd
has caused the Debian Bug report #1039484,
regarding transition: gpsd
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1039484: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039484
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: g...@packages.debian.org, b...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:gpsd

New version of gpsd 3.25 introduces changes in shared libraries API (and of 
course ABI)
soname is bumped from 28 to 30

All rdeps should be good to binNMU against the new libraries, after patching 
some of
them and asking the respective maintainers to upload to unstable.

The expected outcome is a smooth transition.

Ben file:

title = "gpsd";
is_affected = .depends ~ /\b(libgps28|libqgpsmm28)\b/ | .depends ~ 
/\b(libgps30|libqgpsmm30)\b/;
is_good = .depends ~ /\b(libgps30|libqgpsmm30)\b/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /\b(libgps28|libqgpsmm28)\b/;
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2023-06-28 22:00:45 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 2023-06-27 02:01:41 +0300, Boian Bonev wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Tue, 2023-06-27 at 00:13 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> > > 
> > > On 2023-06-26 13:24:57 +, Boian Bonev wrote:
> > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > Severity: normal
> > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > > > Usertags: transition
> > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: g...@packages.debian.org, b...@debian.org
> > > > Control: affects -1 + src:gpsd
> > > > 
> > > > New version of gpsd 3.25 introduces changes in shared libraries API 
> > > > (and of
> > > > course ABI)
> > > > soname is bumped from 28 to 30
> > > > 
> > > > All rdeps should be good to binNMU against the new libraries, after
> > > > patching some of
> > > > them and asking the respective maintainers to upload to unstable.
> > > 
> > > Have bugs for those issues been filed?
> > 
> > No, bugs were not filed.
> > 
> > I went the path of filing PRs and/or sending patches over email. All those 
> > are
> > already merged and the fixed packages have been uploaded.
> 
> Please go ahead

The old packages got removed from testing. Closing.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---


Bug#1038996: marked as done (transition: pantomime)

2023-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 1 Jul 2023 09:58:28 +0200
with message-id 
and subject line Re: Bug#1038996: transition: pantomime
has caused the Debian Bug report #1038996,
regarding transition: pantomime
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1038996: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1038996
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: pantom...@packages.debian.org, 
pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:pantomime
Control: block -1 with 1032830

On behalf of the GNUstep team I'd like to request a transition slot
for pantomime (libpantomime1.3 > 1.4).  Out of the two rdeps
lusernet.app builds successfully while gnumail will require a
sourceful upload due to incompatible API changes (#1032830).

The automatically generated Ben tracker [1] looks fine.

Thanks for your work.

[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-pantomime.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2023-06-25 20:02:48 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> Control: forwarded -1 
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-pantomime.html
> 
> On 2023-06-24 11:39:54 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: pantom...@packages.debian.org, 
> > pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> > Control: affects -1 + src:pantomime
> > Control: block -1 with 1032830
> > 
> > On behalf of the GNUstep team I'd like to request a transition slot
> > for pantomime (libpantomime1.3 > 1.4).  Out of the two rdeps
> > lusernet.app builds successfully while gnumail will require a
> > sourceful upload due to incompatible API changes (#1032830).
> 
> Please go ahead

That's done.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher--- End Message ---


Processed: Re: Bug#1039961: transition: libexecs

2023-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1039961 [release.debian.org] transition: libexecs
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
1039961: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039961
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1039961: transition: libexecs

2023-07-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 confirmed

On 2023-06-30 09:46:54 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: libex...@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:libexecs
> Control: submitter -1 Renzo Davoli 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'd like to ask for permission to carry out this small transition here:
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libexecs.html
> 
> All the relevant rev-deps are OK and binNMUs would take care of them.

Please go ahead

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher



Bug#1038115: transition: gdal

2023-07-01 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2023-06-29 05:26:04 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 6/23/23 10:45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> > On 6/21/23 12:31, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> > > On 6/20/23 23:49, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > > On 2023-06-15 17:15:27 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> > > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > > Severity: normal
> > > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > > > > Usertags: transition
> > > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: g...@packages.debian.org
> > > > > Control: affects -1 + src:gdal
> > > > > Control: forwarded -1
> > > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gdal.html
> > > > > Control: block -1 by 1030129 998833 1037920 984398 1037976
> > > > > 
> > > > > For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to GDAL 3.7.0.
> > > > 
> > > > Please go ahead.
> > > 
> > > gdal (3.7.0+dfsg-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is now built &
> > > installed on all release architectures.
> > 
> > Please also binNMU mysql-workbench which builds successfully now that
> > the ca-certificates-java workaround is in unstable.
> 
> mysql-workbench still needs to be rebuilt in unstable.

Scheduled

> r-base is blocking testing migration of r-cran-rgdal/r-cran-sf/r-cran-terra
> which in turn prevents the removal of libgdal32 from testing.

Scheduled rebuilds of those three packages in testing.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher



NEW changes in stable-new

2023-07-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: cpdb-libs_1.2.0-2+deb12u1_s390x-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: proftpd-dfsg_1.3.8+dfsg-4+deb12u1_s390x-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: 
texlive-bin_2022.20220321.62855-5.1+deb12u1_s390x-buildd.changes
  ACCEPT