Bug#697101: tpu: freerdp/1.0.1-1.1+deb7u1 (pre-approval)
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org wrote: 2013/1/7 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org: So yes I think I'd prefer an upload reverting the .symbols change. Unfortunately, simply reverting the .symbols change is not enough, as dpkg-gensymbols is passed -c4 option which makes freerdp FTBFS due to newly added symbols. What do you suggest? Lowering -c4 to -c3 to ignore the symbols change? Adjusting the patch to flag the recently added functions as static? I think changing the patch is the way to go. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKrtccMnZD2XoTCeB18bRLGv=ezrxpov3wvmj5s+r1z...@mail.gmail.com
[RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1
Hello, I've been trying to get around to finish d-i release but I've been failing; I am involved in a huge project at work and haven't had much free time et all so I couldn't finish it. I do need help to manage the missing steps and testing. Is someone willing to help on it? I'm sad to ask for it but I won't be able to take it by myself and do need your help. Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador ota...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKrzkwpPdzd1KUJ5t0eFF8jzBeAc+gn=zZPJRf6F=hy...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [RFH] Release of D-I Alpha1
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 16:06, Miguel Figueiredo el...@debianpt.org wrote: I do need help to manage the missing steps and testing. Is someone willing to help on it? Count with me for testing installation images. Can you elaborate remaining steps where we can help? To what we had for a1 basically: get CD images built (Steve, yey!); test them finish announce mail mail to to d-d-a if all above work I'm sad to ask for it but I won't be able to take it by myself and do need your help. I'm sure my opinion is shared with many others, we are glad to participate :) After a1: check new and current bugs that has known fixes or are easy to fix work on those start preparing a2 / b1 -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkr9o0lutzp9pkp2zg1vbrdv4nmeomgaqo_w9ttn4o0...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 13:04, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 14:51 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: I'm traveling but today tonight I'll upload the built installer. That was nearly two weeks ago now; what's the current status? Mostly OK; I need to do some tests and get last changes migrated to get images built using those changes. Were you aiming to include the recent base-installer changes regarding kernel selection? If so the upload probably shouldn't have been urgency=low... :-/ Yes, I do. base-installer os-prober partman-auto-lvm partman-partitioning Those ought to migrate. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKoHucmrmC2jqRfggT8WiBCEX=bpQEOmokJUZ3e+xqu5=w...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
I'm traveling but today tonight I'll upload the built installer. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br Em 26/03/2012 13:57, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk escreveu: On 25.03.2012 11:30, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 13:14 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 18:37 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 14:37 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: win32-loader Not done yet, pending confirmation from ftp-master that it's okay to do so before the corresponding files in /tools/ have been updated. On that note - ftp-master, any preferences for order? :-) Mark said it was okay to migrate, so I've added an unblock hint for tonight's britney run. win32-loader has now migrated. As it turns out, the files in /tools/ had inadvertantly been updated already (due to a bugette which has now been removed). Regards, Adam
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 09:34, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 14:55:00 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: I'd like to propose following timeline for alpha1 of installer: * until 03/14 get all translation-only changed udebs uploaded * until 03/14 get pending fixes commited uploaded * on 03/17 try to get the packages migrated to testing Done, except by the kernel we're depending on so we're waiting for the fixed 3.2 kernel be uploaded so we can migrate it to testing. * once the packages are migrated (depends on the item above) we do the upload of installer Waiting the kernel -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKpT2GectH2+tbj16pQ=hrRY=jabaajeq9g7vy2foem...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 09:49, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Waiting the kernel No you're not, the kernel is the same in wheezy and sid. I didn't see it migrated. I am uploading installer as other packages waiting here (nbd and win32-loader) are not in initrd. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkqk2219e9gs4p0kl6krikrdekbdsep7cwj--dguxl0...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 18:07, Didier Raboud o...@debian.org wrote: Would it be possible to have win32-loader migrated as part of d-i on 03/17 too? I'll ask for it with the other packages. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkri4kpj7vwbt-pl6yrqgy8z2cs5cwgt2hbnj+768sm...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
Hi Release Team, On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 14:55, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: * on 03/17 try to get the packages migrated to testing Please age the following packages: arcboot-installer brltty cdebconf cdrom-detect cdrom-retriever colo-installer debootstrap elilo-installer finish-install flash-kernel fonts-samyak fonts-smc grub-installer installation-report iso-scan mdcfg media-retriever net-retriever network-console nobootloader os-prober partman-auto partman-auto-crypto partman-auto-lvm partman-auto-raid partman-basicmethods partman-btrfs partman-crypto partman-efi partman-ext2r0 partman-ext3 partman-jfs partman-md partman-nbd partman-newworld partman-partitioning partman-prep partman-reiserfs partman-ufs partman-xfs partman-zfs pkgse prep-installer quik-installer rescue sibyl-installer silo-installer user-setup yaboot-installer zipl-installer linux-2.6 win32-loader Regards, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkp8xsrsxcri_spksfumgvjdt7_at_tdf+ayk56sdst...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 15:37, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: partman-ext2r0 Done. Note that the new source package appears to be full of .git cruft. Will check it. partman-nbd Not done. The files client.c, oef and opdr have all disappeared and a chunk of code has changed in resolv.c, without any mention in the changelog. Wouter can you comment on that? pkgse Did you mean pkgsel? yes, sorry. linux-2.6 Nope. It's plenty old enough, but FTBFS on s390*. There's no way it can migrate until that's fixed. Ok. win32-loader Not done yet, pending confirmation from ftp-master that it's okay to do so before the corresponding files in /tools/ have been updated. Ok. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkqrvz-5x-xrpw3s2myvhzsaqhcir9sskofnc5cuas1...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 16:47, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: * until 03/14 get all translation-only changed udebs uploaded * until 03/14 get pending fixes commited uploaded * on 03/17 try to get the packages migrated to testing Are there any non-installer-specific packages on that list that either haven't been uploaded yet, or have non-small changes that haven't been in unstable for very long? Not that I am aware of, except the change on installer itself that I want to do after a1 release to have it autobuilding. Does this also imply a new kernel upload to fix the mips* ext3-modules issue? (r18812 in kernel SVN) Dunno if we can consider it a blocker for a1 and we can do binNMU if needed later as well. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKorJ-ehRKFUQCBHLVrZ5NAONbCDOaQL7mvMhYatPD5=s...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 20:20, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 15:33:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: Dunno if we can consider it a blocker for a1 and we can do binNMU if needed later as well. It's fixed already. I'll do translation mass-upload tomorrow during day and night. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkrj0rgtczvhcdvrc+1dqsodvve8hebwdkrrwaqrhch...@mail.gmail.com
Proposal to get Wheezy Alpha1 done
Hello, I'd like to propose following timeline for alpha1 of installer: * until 03/14 get all translation-only changed udebs uploaded * until 03/14 get pending fixes commited uploaded * on 03/17 try to get the packages migrated to testing * once the packages are migrated (depends on the item above) we do the upload of installer If it all does well, we could have it done in two weeks ... I'd like to know if someone has any objection with the above otherwise I plan to start following it. Comments? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKoCe=vf39cwnpbbphjhgoibtt27ajqhapydfmjmwuz...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Automatically identify the suite to use for udeb fetching
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:18, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.ukwrote:
+BUILDD_TARGET=$(shell [[ -e /etc/buildd_target ]] sed
's,sid,unstable,g' /etc/buildd_target || echo )
+ifeq (${BUILDD_TARGET},)
+USE_UDEBS_FROM=$(shell grep -q '/sid$' /etc/debian_version echo
unstable || cat /etc/debian_version)
Right now, on a stable system, that will result in USE_UDEBS_FROM being
set to 6.0.4. That doesn't seem like it will do anything useful,
particularly as there's no such directory in dists/ (there's a
Debian6.0.4 symlink, but I imagine that trying to get apt to use that
is unlikely to work well).
Ok; I can fix this using lsb_release -c -s in case it is not unstable.
I realise that the plan is for it to be handled via the new variable, I
just wonder if there's an alternative approach that doesn't rely on
changes to every {old,}stable, testing and experimental build chroot. I
pondered suggesting parsing sources.list, but then realised that won't
work if sources.list.d files are in use.
I did a version that parsed sources.list before but it has too many
possible complications here.
This would allow us to have the experimental building working, using
experimental buildds, and use unstable for beta and rc releases. When
stable comes, buildds can set the suite according too.
Has this been discussed with the buildd folks yet, given they'd need to
be the ones adding all the flag files?
Only at Debconf; after that no. We ought to discuss this with them too.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Automatically identify the suite to use for udeb fetching
[ Please reply to debian-boot ]
To try to work out of box for most situations we use
/etc/debian_version information to detect from witch suite to
grab udebs from but allow for overriden by auto-builders.
After this change, following use-cases are covered:
- Building from UNRELEASED code: default to unstable;
- If /etc/buildd_target exists, use this for suite (to be used by
buildds)
- Otherise, use /etc/debian_version to detect the suite to use.
This would allow us to have the experimental building working, using
experimental buildds, and use unstable for beta and rc releases. When
stable comes, buildds can set the suite according too.
Comments?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
From 6a72e0607272838ffdc462fba0f06e429a14dfe6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 04:04:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Automatically identify the suite to use for udeb fetching
To try to work out of box for most situations we use
/etc/debian_version information to detect from witch suite to grab
udebs from but allow for overriden by auto-builders.
After this change, following use-cases are covered:
- Building from UNRELEASED code: default to unstable;
- If /etc/buildd_target exists, use this for suite (to be used by
buildds)
- Otherise, use /etc/debian_version to detect the suite to use.
---
debian/changelog |3 +++
debian/rules | 15 ---
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index e40cee1..188fb05 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -182,6 +182,9 @@ debian-installer (2011) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
[ Jurij Smakov ]
* Update kernel version to 3.2.0-1.
+ [ Otavio Salvador ]
+ * Automatically identify the suite to use for udeb fetching.
+
-- Jurij Smakov ju...@debian.org Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:20:41 +
debian-installer (20110106) unstable; urgency=low
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 60e2f41..385c6eb 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -3,14 +3,23 @@
ARCH=$(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH)
VERSION=$(shell LC_ALL=C dpkg-parsechangelog | grep ^Version: | cut -d ' ' -f 2)
DATE=$(shell echo $(VERSION) | cut -d '.' -f 1)
-SUITE=$(shell LC_ALL=C dpkg-parsechangelog | grep ^Distribution: | cut -d ' ' -f 2)
-ifeq (${SUITE},UNRELEASED)
+
+PKG_SUITE=$(shell LC_ALL=C dpkg-parsechangelog | grep ^Distribution: | cut -d ' ' -f 2)
+
+ifeq (${PKG_SUITE},UNRELEASED)
USE_UDEBS_FROM=unstable
+USE_PROPOSED_UPDATES=0
TRANSSTATUS=
BOOTMENU_BEEP=n
else
-USE_UDEBS_FROM=wheezy
+BUILDD_TARGET=$(shell [[ -e /etc/buildd_target ]] sed 's,sid,unstable,g' /etc/buildd_target || echo )
+ifeq (${BUILDD_TARGET},)
+USE_UDEBS_FROM=$(shell grep -q '/sid$' /etc/debian_version echo unstable || cat /etc/debian_version)
USE_PROPOSED_UPDATES=0
+else
+USE_UDEBS_FROM=${BUILDD_TARGET}
+USE_PROPOSED_UPDATES=1
+endif
TRANSSTATUS=translation-status
BOOTMENU_BEEP=y
endif
--
1.7.9
Bug#622134: transition: openssl 1.0.0
Hi Rene, On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:10, Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org wrote: ... That was all what was to prove. No one denied that sid might have picked up 1.0.0, but testing definitely isn't (and this isdnutils keeps openssl 0.9.8 in testing as the idnutils *there* *does* depend on 0.9.8) It seems that fixing the RC bug, in the isdnutils case, was the missing thing and now seems OK. So now it turns into the normal transition window as this blocker has been fixed. Have I missed anything? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkqkroufsysov40pc+vzr4kbzsvy2rwp61tq5sc+gkv...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [Parted-maintainers] Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 14:08, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 18:09 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2011/9/22 Arno Töll deb...@toell.net: To achieve that, we would need to backport at least the following bug fixes and improvements. Note #635627 is already on its way to p-u (#637020): Bug # -- package -- title 635384 -- parted -- detection of ZFS volumes (ZVOL) Colin et al, any chance this can make it to Squeeze point release? It's the last non-DI package in Arno's list. If you mean in to 6.0.3, is there any particular benefit to trying to push that particular update at this late stage in the process, given that the partman-* changes won't be included? Might it not make more sense to look at the remaining changes as a set for 6.0.4? For me, 6.0.4 seems more realistic as all that wouldn't need to be done in a rush. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkpmfsq0rcxhrkxtqo_dr8t34oxrsjp2bf1o1xdoqpy...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#637111: pu: package freebsd-libs/8.1-6
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 08:04, Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote: 2011/9/17 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk: On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 14:51 +, Robert Millan wrote: * Move libsbuf.so.0 to /lib (needed by /sbin/zfs and /sbin/zpool). (Closes: #637100) * Move libipx.so.2 to /lib (needed by ifconfig). Have the portions of this change which affect the udebs been run past the d-i team? They're in testing and being used for new builds already. In any case, D-I team please if you have any objection to libsbuf.so.0 and libipx.so.2 being in /lib, please let us know. These libraries are needed in /lib because zfs and zpool are linked with them, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636668#55 for the bug report. No problem from our POV. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKrFD8q4CVz4UtsA_7j4pA=qctptuszweg0qlqeebq6...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Removal of linux-modules-di-* packages
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:58, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: can the linux-modules-di-* packages be removed from unstable? They seem to be built against 2.6.30 anyway and hence not useful. If so I can file the RM bugs. Yes; those can be removed. Thanks by handling it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkqewuawwogd_wiybc6mtvvwf0m+o-jfp1fyjfc+cfl...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [RFC] Use of Built-Using in debian-installer
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 16:36, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote: On 07/30/2011 06:23 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: Basically it gather all udebs included on the initrd and puts this information in the Built-Using field of the binary package. Comments, welcome :-) Great start, though Built-Using expects source packages instead of binary (or udeb) packages. Mostly fixed in my local repository; will post it soon. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAP9ODKrBUFEN1GALcK3W9Psyir84frr=rqjrojk2uadpbjd...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Changes to Debian Installer release process
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 17:04, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote: ... * Debian Installer daily builds to be done from source uploads The daily builds will use the archive source for building so every time we do a change in unstable in a module that is included in initrd it will trigger a binNMU in all architectures replicating what we have in daily builds. When source changes in debian-installer source package are done, a new source upload will be required. Do the daily builds only uncover issues from building the initrd? A.k.a. will changes in packages other than the one in the initrd only have an effect on the install via genuine downloading from the archive at the time of the install? Mostly; the only addition situation we'll need to rebuild the installer is when the amount of translation changes for a specific language so we get the 'translation-status' file updated into the initrd. Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkpinxtg0z7neo1mye-jgrx_lh1tmry0_q3nm1g8z9e...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [RFC] Use of Built-Using in debian-installer
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 17:05, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 16:36, Luk Claes l...@debian.org wrote: On 07/30/2011 06:23 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: Basically it gather all udebs included on the initrd and puts this information in the Built-Using field of the binary package. Comments, welcome :-) Great start, though Built-Using expects source packages instead of binary (or udeb) packages. Mostly fixed in my local repository; will post it soon. So I got it done; please take a look at it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br control Description: Binary data
Re: [RFC] Use of Built-Using in debian-installer
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 17:54, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Looks sane from a quick look. Can we also see the code that generates this, maybe? I sent the two patches I have queued to push to mailing list; please comment on them. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkoeo0nn6wtlu+6aabr5qtb0+5_nd4emv46aaj3mxxk...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Changes to Debian Installer release process
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 22:12, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br): Mostly; the only addition situation we'll need to rebuild the installer is when the amount of translation changes for a specific language so we get the 'translation-status' file updated into the initrd. We might need to find a way to avoid rebuilding just because *one* language changed. Mostly because this happens really often..we don't really have control about the translator's schedule and they happen to commit things more or less randomly (with peaks when something is changed in a string, or when strings are added: some like to be 100% all time long..:-)). But this will change only when we upload the package to the archive so we can try to upload a set of packages with translation updates to avoid this. Basically the binNMU would be triggered when the translation status change for a language and since we work with percentage this will not change on every translation update. As I'm watching all this very regularly, we could maybe imagine something where the i18n coordinator can trigger an l10n-rebuild because (s)he notices that a given language changed significantly enough to be worth itor because it has been too much time since the last rebuild and many very small changes piled up. Or maybe if there's no initrd changes queue it to the end of week if nothing else changes? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odko0ent87kdj_cevexzwi+g+iedn8r9__kqgluzn7_u...@mail.gmail.com
[RFC] Use of Built-Using in debian-installer
Hello, During this night I got some nice progress on the stuff planned to debian-installer. I am adding the generated control file for review and comments. Basically it gather all udebs included on the initrd and puts this information in the Built-Using field of the binary package. Comments, welcome :-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br control Description: Binary data
[RFC] Suite to use for next upload - patch included
Hello,
I am considering to use unstable for next upload and for it I did a
try to get suite mostly (more details regarding translation-status
later) done.
Comments, welcome...
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
From 44f04757bac2ff38ecf796a9cf6a8c5252e4bdbe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 04:04:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Use upload suite as origin to udebs
---
debian/changelog |1 +
debian/rules |6 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 865ffdc..78c161b 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ debian-installer (2011) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
[ Otavio Salvador ]
* Update Linux kernel to 3.0.0-1
+ * Use upload suite as origin to udebs
-- Robert Millan r...@debian.org Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:34:48 +0200
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index a434c5f..a659a5e 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -9,8 +9,12 @@ USE_UDEBS_FROM=unstable
TRANSSTATUS=
BOOTMENU_BEEP=n
else
-USE_UDEBS_FROM=wheezy
+USE_UDEBS_FROM=$(SUITE)
+ifeq (,$(filter stable wheezy stable-proposed-updates wheezy-proposed-updates,${SUITE}))
USE_PROPOSED_UPDATES=0
+else
+USE_PROPOSED_UPDATES=1
+endif
TRANSSTATUS=translation-status
BOOTMENU_BEEP=y
endif
--
1.7.5.4
[RFC] Problems regarding automatic binNMUs
Hello, In debian-installer we have a status file that is used to warn the users depending if their language is not full translate. Currently when we prepare the release upload we run a script that downloads the source of all udebs and prepare a table of the level of translation to each language (example attached). With the use of binNMUs to gather new updates in unstable we will face a problem of how to update this file in the source. My current proposal is: * For each udeb upload: * DAK stores into a table the number of strings and the number of translations for each language * DAK stores a similar file into dists/foo/main/Translation-Status-udeb.txt with the proper values With it, the installer, during the build can download it and keep it updated regarding the translation status of every language automatically. Comments, welcome ;-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br translation-status Description: Binary data
Changes to Debian Installer release process
I used some of Debcamp and Debconf time this year to discuss the Debian Installer release process with some people and after talking with many people it seems we agreed on the following changes on Debian Installer release process and it would be interesting to receive feedback on those to see if anyone see a problem we didn't notice yet. * Official uploads to be built against unstable Currently when we do a source upload of debian-installer it gather all build-depends on /unstable/ but the udebs from /testing/. We want to get it change and all udebs be fetched from unstable so we will migrate it all to testing when ready and not before building as done currently. This is going to make easier to Debian Installer and Debian Release teams to coordinate the migration of packages to testing. Philipp will send a mail regarding this with more details later. * Linux kernel udebs to be built from linux source package We won't get rid of kernel-wedge instead linux source package will use it during the build process to produce all the kernel udebs from it. Ben will send a mail about this later with a more detailed description. * Debian Installer daily builds to be done from source uploads The daily builds will use the archive source for building so every time we do a change in unstable in a module that is included in initrd it will trigger a binNMU in all architectures replicating what we have in daily builds. When source changes in debian-installer source package are done, a new source upload will be required. * Debian Installer experimental builds With Linux kernel udebs built from linux source we have the possibility to get the installer built against the development kernel that will be available on experimental and this is quite important to us to be able to test all this before it is available in unstable to avoid bad surprises for us and users. This will also be a handy tool for us to play with not well tested or finished stuff without breaking installer to end users. For now, I think we will need to use an infra-structure similar of what we have today for daily builds for those. * Use of britney to handle package and installer migration This is the end of the process and some details are yet unknown how this is going to happen however but our goal is to make it happen since it will alleviate a lot the amount of work to make Debian Installer release to happen. It is important to notice that it is not a single-man effort but a coordinate and shared effort of Debian Kernel, Debian Release and Debian Installer teams to get all this done. Those changes are not going to happen at once but in a progressive process and at the end this is going to make the installer release process easier to understand and handle. Please share your ideas regarding those proposed changes so we can start looking on the required changes to accomplish all this. Thanks in advance, Regards, -- Otavio Salvador ota...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odko9_21zxolagenchnte8+xc1p4xr6vxnavugqcwekb...@mail.gmail.com
Re: d-i changes
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 16:50, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: ... * Later on d-i should be fixed not to have the Linux kernel and ABI version hardcoded. This is not currently considered critical because it does not happen too often. Some solution needs to be found that provides d-i with the right version to use (without the kernel flavour). This is one thing I prefer to not fix since it makes too easy to people to use d-i with untested kernel versions and this is a big problem specially with stable releases since people try to use d-i with newer kernels and this can resuing in different level of problems. Imagine that people could be using lenny installer with wheezy kernel and expect it to run since it built fine. So at least people know that they're changing a hardcoded value and then it's their responsability to deal with it. So the steps seem to be: ... 4. Profit and get rid of d-i releases and just handle d-i like any other package. Let's get rid of Otavio ;-) ... Well, this is my goal too so it will be much eaiser to deal with d-i and to have more people joining the development if it is made easier. Let's work for it to happen :-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkrsa71p1ywbc2zc7ng5f5gpidijewgoguo9fqqhzsf...@mail.gmail.com
Re: d-i decruft in sid
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:17, Mark Hymers m...@debian.org wrote: I fully agree with Christian; we just need to have the current release on sid and we really don't need to have the old ones. Ok, done. Thanks by handling it. Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTikWbMhsuUsr7209YywAb_e=-e5...@mail.gmail.com
Re: d-i decruft in sid
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 03:42, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: Quoting Joerg Jaspert (jo...@ganneff.de): Heyho we just noticed that the dists/sid dir is getting unreasonably large, its at 11gigabyte right now. Most of that due to a huge number of d-i versions we have. Can we decruft some of them? The more the better. This is sid/ right? If so, I don't really see why we need to keep version older than the last released, ie 20110106 (+b1). I fully agree with Christian; we just need to have the current release on sid and we really don't need to have the old ones. ... otavio mentioned a small VAC so his answer might be delayed. I am mostly recovered and handling the backlog I had during my VAC and recovering process. Please apologise my delay in replying to this thread. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=xbjkcvtxxtlz_0o6ymqpbw2l...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.32-31) for point release 6.0.1
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 05:18, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: ... That should be fine. That gives us time to include longterm release 2.6.32.30 and pick up a few other bug fixes. It would be nice if it can be done before since I'll do a surgery on 26th and need to travel for it on 24th or 25th. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTimoueanxN+CjQGSFLN3i0H1=euk5pbou0_9k...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 18:09, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: It looks like this got uploaded, but targeted at unstable where there's already a newer version, so it got rejected: Yes. I did it wrong :-( My fault. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=duGdtpn2tVfAKkHL6bvT4xXW_rp=piojov...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.32-31) for point release 6.0.1
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 18:19, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +, Otavio Salvador wrote: It depends on the ETA for 6.0.1. I'd a week before the targeted date assuming it builds fine on all arches. For a confort level, I'd say a cuple of weeks like a good time for we to update the installer for it. OK, so what's the targeted date? It doesn't depends on me. It is RMs' call. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=qj43n57nyn9zod8vmjngugykne3hum5rl_...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (2.6.32-31) for point release 6.0.1
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:53, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: ... I know that I need to upload in time for the installer team to rebuild the installer with the new kernel version, addressing the known issues with the kernel used in 6.0.0. Please could you let me know what the deadline is for that? ... It depends on the ETA for 6.0.1. I'd a week before the targeted date assuming it builds fine on all arches. For a confort level, I'd say a cuple of weeks like a good time for we to update the installer for it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTikHqk+28JYqnis5RF1oLVgRvEBcjJH=ped8z...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 18:10, Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com wrote: * Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br [2011-02-12 22:46]: I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following: There are two more updates I'd like to see in 6.0.1: - libdebian-installer: I added a one-liner to recognize a new ARM device. - colo-installer: bug fix to generate a correct config file. Without this fix, all installations of Debian on Cobalt fail. (Well, the installer works, but they will fail to boot the newly installed system). Please preparae and push the respective squeeze branches so we start uploading soon. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik1thsu4sgeketjwz4yka7qak6xeilg9s7is...@mail.gmail.com
Re: please unblock udev
No objection from our side. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik-4arhndeiqrjl49+r9_y6pfeg+1j+113vc...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [SRM] Seeking approval for hw-detect changes for 6.0.1
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 22:15, Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org wrote: ... Ping, any opinions on this? ... From my POV it seems fine. RM people? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTiksRAAw=gyikono+jhst5jmwagp2tdsuhhrm...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [SRM] Approval for xorg-server/2:1.7.7-13
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 20:30, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: ... Otavio/-boot@: the thread started here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/02/msg00286.html ... It is OK for us. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTikYmaEkzbmYXw4v=fqqrntrfrlfjs+nkuasa...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:19, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 22:46:07 +, Otavio Salvador wrote: ... Is there any chance we can update the apt-setup debconf templates to stop talking about volatile? I guess so. It is more a translation issue then a technical one. Christian? :-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=dwtcc+mqcpah38ydvxqxlkiqw1j_ceuv7z...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 21:02, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 21:52:53 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: In short, I know that volatile is now named squeeze-updates...but how is it called more generically? 'Urgent bug fixes', or something to that effect? They're not only bug fixes but also database updates and like. Important system updates? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikfqgx+_y+l_hdbijjfnwymwh9ozrwr3q0zt...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 00:41, Joey Hess jo...@debian.org wrote: Julien Cristau wrote: Is there any chance we can update the apt-setup debconf templates to stop talking about volatile? Since squeeze-updates (volatile) vs squeeze/updates (security) are now being seen as confusingly similar names -- And, since this thread demonstrates that we don't have an agreed on human-understandable name for it -- Perhaps we should determine what the suite will finally be called in wheezy, and use that name in d-i? +1 -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTik+OVUqEHQ8c5rEs5K4oeJ_1Kj2aoO=3wssa...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 23:13, Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org wrote: On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:46:07PM +, Otavio Salvador wrote: ... linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 This should probably be uploaded once the update kernel for 6.0.1 is available? Yes. But all kernel udebs will be uploaded again but sparc is the only one with a specific change for now. tasksel cdebconf debootstrap kernel-wedge Please include debian-installer as well, I've committed a patch targeting 6.0.1. Sure. Forgot to add it here. I will create the branch for it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktik_a--phigms4a-dleyh7jbxdizfwhatu7ob...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 02:52, Joey Hess jo...@debian.org wrote: Otavio Salvador wrote: grub-installer I don't see a squeeze branch, but assuming it's fixing the debconf title bug, all for it. humm. My bad. I am uploading the branch right now. tasksel I'd prefer to note remove software from packages in stable that users could already expect to get installed. #611951 can wait until wheezy. Any changes to desktop tasks are inherently dangerous, the KDE CD was barely made to fit at the very last minute (by dropping the release notes from it). So while I'm sad that #610790 didn't get fixed in squeeze (accessability is important), someone would need to do a lot of checking to get that in. :-( I agree with you. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi}oqazfdnxhul9wz_9rk6uo6zwgsbcrtiw...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 00:03, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 23:13 +, Jurij Smakov wrote: I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following: The below shouldn't be assumed to be an ack or nack for the particular uploads at this point. grub-installer There doesn't appear to be a squeeze branch for this listed on gitweb; for a stable update, the hurd fixes wouldn't be appropriate for instance. I uploaded the branch. My fault. Please take a look. tasksel Would this include all of the changes between 2.88 and 2.89, or just some subset? As I think I've mentioned before, changes which might affect what ends up on CD1 for any given CD set worry me, particularly given the last minute problems we had for 6.0.0 with getting the release notes on to the CDs and trying to get all of the packages required for KDE CD1 to fit on a single CD for some architectures. It is sad but I will agree with you. I will drop the branch :-( cdebconf debootstrap kernel-wedge Please include debian-installer as well, I've committed a patch targeting 6.0.1. I'd imagine this would want to be uploaded closer to the point release, or at least we'll need to rebuild it later on to pick up any further builds of lkdi-* or other udebs. cdebconf and debootstrap can go soon. installer itself neeeds lkdi. kernel-wedge I will wait a bit more to see if nothing important shows up to avoid doing another upload in a roll. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTim2uyugEnY=U6Z2V7n8_9nHRS8gQG37sMT-TO=p...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:57, Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com wrote: tasksel I'd prefer to note remove software from packages in stable that users could already expect to get installed. #611951 can wait until wheezy. I'd say xsane is installed rather *unexpectedly*. Having to save space by deleting the release notes and on the other hand installing two scanning applications is somehow hard to make clear to people... The problem here is that the CD layout will change completely and can bring or remove packages due this change. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimvv2rujbc_no39v2lx8-zugorpawr4thwtj...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 14:51, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote: IMHO console-setup should be uploaded as well to fix #610843. AFAIR it was agreed that this is 6.0.1 material when the bug first appeared. If you want I can prepare a branch and upload the fix. Please prepare the branch so near of 6.0.1 we do all the uploads. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimwgkejofuopqceef9zvxagolv8zrjrbekc6...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 15:15, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 15:51:50 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: IMHO console-setup should be uploaded as well to fix #610843. AFAIR it was agreed that this is 6.0.1 material when the bug first appeared. If you want I can prepare a branch and upload the fix. It needs to be fixed and tested in sid first. This is right. Samuel, can you upload console-setup (to sid) plz? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktiknddc6egrc2ug7lxia-jm1eupopxvsovcsd...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 19:49, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: My fault. Please take a look. Just the debconf title fix so far? That looks fine; thanks. Up to now, yes. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=cjk8vg7berge9bwkifnk+f7fnqkv0v7+1a...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 20:45, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote: I've created a squeeze branch for console-setup branched from the version in squeeze with only the change to fix #610843 and pushed this branch to the d-i repo. Thanks by doing that. Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTikb7musBnYnZpG=ymaptnegbs+tvapbreejz...@mail.gmail.com
Preparation of fixes to 6.0.1
Hello folks, I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following: grub-installer linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6 tasksel cdebconf debootstrap kernel-wedge Please take a look and comment on those. If you think anything is missing please say so. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTinTbvVOnR0xcET=0GMbA3rHO6Hkg48JQJYK6a=8...@mail.gmail.com
[semi-VAC] From 23th of Jan to 2rd of Feb
Hello, I am going to travel with my family and the connection will be uncertain so I preferred to notify the teams that could require any action from my side to not wait for me those days. For d-i specific issues I trust Joey, Colin and Christian for any need decision required to allow the Squeeze to happen. On 3rd of Feb I ought to be back and regularly online again. Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTikOChyLmdagQmSzUak7786mYXGyyvin5H=tc...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#606441: unblock: yaboot/1.3.13a-1squeeze1
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 19:52, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote: On 12/09/2010 10:27 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: I sponsored an uploaded of yaboot to testing-proposed-updates with the following changes to fix RC bugs: yaboot (1.3.13a-1squeeze1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low . * Team upload. * Get scsi, sata, and firewire drive info from sysfs as legacy /proc/scsi interface does not exist anymore. (Closes: #572869, #377097, #342833, #289201) * Use persistent device naming symlinks, UUID and LABEL tags instead of unix block device names. (Closes: #580455) * debian/copyright: Add copyright notice from ofpath. The package has to go thourgh t-p-u because there is a newer upstream version already uploaded to sid. I'm ok to approve this upload but I prefer to have an ack from Otavio (or boot folks) first. Please accept it however in the yaboot case I would prefer to try to get a newer version into squeeze after this fix has been done. So in my opinion we ought: - accept the t-p-u upload; - get those fixes into the sid one and if it proves stable get it into squeeze. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinth2_25mv=qrirymwmepvfpevvdw2=l23c2...@mail.gmail.com
Debian Installer required unblocks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, Please unblock and age following packages: user-setup hw-detect os-prober Thanks in advance, - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: CDFC6E4F Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.9 http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJM7S7SAAoJEOtw/vPN/G5PwpoQALuXvxkqTBQrAw0UhD70A/e9 dZvAV7u88w3wsmZOPzlPTQL4ZF42HIDi/HghcDm6CqXtB6YKPh6QppeatrMTSyE9 nEfEyS2o/ySpEprsg2RDXc+IxpyUNL9lrcu9v1Zjr4iy/5LUDMZtup/GjU+8Cd9y 9uB0YsUZQINots/iktGS7Qu6JaEdQZ0Po9rMLVQ/OfJOAjDrNOM9iZpQ5R+F1tdE WnZbiMd8HUMHK7dBmT1ZYgi0va5AMOR1tRMG8YzDDOfrz7DhSSmIWYzP8Yq+hVKc OUzewc7zs/IDTJdQeg2bhnyWb5HVobmOzbhmxolcgLc3dwnwis+BBuIeBHm6fl0R xDOIuiNDBAUokcCyV6jwtkafGBBqmBBGaL5E4kq05xrG1cMe42NeH3iqvfJn0vnz /7nPVZ02rzTJp8fZdBf46CC+G9eHzuBZ/J9oENnPZcQf+iHo34ANfH2ah1p5I3xI IHuW8HLdKTLmz5UG3Xm3lrIc4zybP24nT+KReGnTbpecRwFJ2DuauhMyFsvty/Nd mAjvwXupmPT8WZsq+7Mg9ZTuKRB0TydPd4JAF53YLzOqnjURqYaFQYB76N5pr0Ol k66Toq6izGc9MI1hpRiqVnIiUBZ+UBMa7biypW9y+uzgGq5Xiw/qELeB8228UOO4 etDKJwun+xlS8dKXpKqe =91PY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874ob6n3mu@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br
Re: new udebs
Hello, Sorry by the delay: debian-ports-archive-keyring btrfs-tools espeak isc-dhcp freebsd-libs freebsd-utils libbsd libfakekey libpciaccess libxrender matchbox-keyboard ufsutils zfsutils ttf-sinhala-lklug Those are auto. kfreebsd-kernel-di-amd64 kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386 Needs ack. However at this time, please do not unblock d-i affecting packages without coordinating with us. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikctqxj1pzoj582v_6vdv6gbfnvu5vz08xoe...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges
Maybe god ;-) On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote: On 20/10/2010 11:18, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: So I would suggest to use a name that is more likely to be unique. unique wrt. what? admin seems unique since not used in Debian yet. Happy hacking, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cbec179.6030...@dogguy.org -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=vdves+9hmzv4bsuxxl03zmqriqir2gbptd...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Call for testers: new yaboot package release
Hello, On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Benjamin Cama ben...@free.fr wrote: BTW, yaboot-installer will have to be fixed regarding amiga partition table numbering : it has been fixed upstream, and there's no need for a workaround anymore. (well, just reading from the patch; I don't have such a machine to test on) Once the version has been tested and we get an agreements with Debian Release team about accepting it into Squeeze we can fix yaboot-installeer. Debian Release Team, if users give possitive feedback about yaboot I think we ought to accept it into squeeze. yaboot has not received updating since long time and it was know broken for many situation. Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=fxn3jmvemjtwnsje3gue3sekotstaacg...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Unblock xserver-xorg-video-geode
Hello, On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 21:42 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:06 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: + /* Allocates shadow memory, and allocating a new space for Rotatation. it's spelled rotation. Where was this again? It's only a typo in the comment, but I could at least fix it in GIT. $ grep -ir rotatation xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.9/ xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.9/src/lx_display.c: /* Allocates shadow memory, and allocating a new space for Rotatation. I fixed it in master. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktim7qyht0fppkknhqh2qyyfhkgr6eenlrcvot...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Unblock xserver-xorg-video-geode
Hello, 2010/9/21 Martin-Éric Racine q-f...@iki.fi: Andres Salomon submitted a simple fix for this issue. Basically, we no longer check the panel bit. Instead, we only check if we're running on DCON-equipped hardware to make an exact match for the OLPC XO-1 configuration which, if found, will set the display to the XO-1's unique resolution. This has been committed upstream and could be added to the current 2.11.9 package as a patch and pushed as 2.11.9-3. Is there any other issue left to address, before this unblock request can be approved? Please prepare the package and let me know so I can sponsor it for you. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimmhq43y23syjcup88opfvpb-w3nzmmwgboy...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#594987: unblock: parted/2.3-2
Hello, On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: As far as I know, updating the udebs here will be safe, as there are no API or ABI changes. CCing -boot for confirmation. Looks good to me, pending ack from Otavio. Ack. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimcwo5b27yk6r1mzoy89exvxgugb=mwdchnv...@mail.gmail.com
Re: s390-tools unblock
Hello, On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Hi, s390-tools is preventing linux-2.6 from moving to testing. Otavio, is it ok to unblock it? It is safe.. unblock it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimuoewv2tp73tj89mzsjtpjb2womwvuhppj-...@mail.gmail.com
Re: udeb unblock: partman-md
Hello, On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: Hi, partman-md fixes an RC bug (#591917). Would it be ok to unblock it? Ack (just did it on IRC) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=tbv8hrns0wgr6tkxqwbzhtjmlrwohuj7jw...@mail.gmail.com
Unblock xserver-xorg-video-geode
Hello Please unblock it since it fixes many critical issues for users. TIA, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTinifKg,nfju7uzhcz=ybnz+k25cf8f+sdq...@mail.gmail.com
Unblock freerdp
Hello This release fixes VirtualBox RDP connection issues and other bugs, please unblock. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimmed5fuhodbvrsqlbjz0=qkdgrjjyyi5ipb...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Unblock xserver-xorg-video-geode
Hello,
I am adding Martin-Eric to CC so he can address those issues.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:51:39 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Please unblock it since it fixes many critical issues for users.
-Provides: ${xviddriver:Provides}, xserver-xorg-video-amd
+Provides: ${xserver:Provides}, xserver-xorg-video-amd
Please add xorg-driver-video to Provides.
Agreed.
I don't understand the change to lx_crtc_gamma_set.
This was a fix for gnome-screensaver.
Change: 2bcbc0b64091218d348ad9f699370e4bfde3948b
I can't review most of the EXA changes, but hey, what could possibly go
wrong...
+ /* DCON Panel specific resolution - OLPC's one */
+ if (pGeode-Output (OUTPUT_PANEL | OUTPUT_DCON)) {
The check kind of disagrees with the comment, this will match for an
OUTPUT_PANEL with isn't OUTPUT_DCON.
This matches the panels used in OLPC machines. It is the flag seted in
LXPreInit (lx_driver.c). It looks OK for me.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikj74w0yk_krjayncngk-jkwnk7idcqy-ndv...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Unblock xserver-xorg-video-geode
Hello, On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: I don't understand the change to lx_crtc_gamma_set. This was a fix for gnome-screensaver. Change: 2bcbc0b64091218d348ad9f699370e4bfde3948b I can see that, and the bug it references, and I still don't understand. Maybe it's just how the geode palette works, but I'd like a clearer explanation. :) Is it a requirement for the unblock? I am not involved on this change so I don't know all the background of it. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinchysgsby2uhev0od5me-upl_qmfsrdzsyo...@mail.gmail.com
Re: udeb unblocks: netcfg, libdebian-installer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes: busybox recently migrated to testing; this new version apparently has an incompatibility with the netcfg version currently in testing, so we were asked by Aurelien whether it would be possible to migrate netcfg as well. netcfg is on the cannot automatically migrate without approval udeb list and, in order to migrate it, the new version of libdebian-installer (which is also on the needs approval list) would also have to migrate at the same time. ack for netcfg and libdebian-installer. - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: CDFC6E4F Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.9 http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMb/ONAAoJEOtw/vPN/G5P7PsQAMvk7w6OKHdNlY7feguPQnrx Rns/iZiKVntuA+AjoHPb2obJmj+XFZ4SSj5hvww1Qyn0mFgjiXxzu0Y6iuqimaZ0 OQKK/XGZ/pZashfdajd+xKqLs69s6j8KDNj15ge+ub/wIAz/neNop5AXpmSeoP2E /YYqt3YHlauqVcz9+Ut/FnEXK8rliUJlkU3ibxgWYMj8xcwD799zPimWM/E4i4QQ zXX5Ey/fGlw/dKXAMEOu9sTOWMtGyl+n7MiXBMFkE0bZuOk20PQ6rowQ9TRdchuh 4tNP6AX7dXeQUVtD73PtH1c6S+YN4qv9KX/nQIPNXbgiscJSL/a2u6M6RmuB01ae aYLNoX5R2Zd/2eW24qqm8dF6LYJFWEINU/CNrkXjr1uxbOnVJpqX1zw2CMriRFyu fvovWi4howgRu7Hirfby2pyycBzxxGdDTIJtrryMjvCBTlImTO/Xahu6Rc3Fzv54 v1bxyPShQgBRPWpQsvtUGwv1HekYAQMDUrsYwsB/Gwmz2JpRCkEEz0KgxZmq0NAA 66+9+d2MXFU1AFp3BTwHe1jejWqU0LwM+ouJcjaGur6Lt6d30aFirOMKfU55bGhm ejXm/TFrErU1kVZ9hbVtvSIj/bOyWtI/YWffsTF2YlReMq+jMPluUiTMy/+DJdEs 2F9b8Y2Sd1beFpav+8q2 =9UnZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87mxsg6kiy@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br
Re: unblock busybox?
Hello, On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote: Quoting Paul Wise (p...@debian.org): Hi all, Would it be possible to unblock busybox? It has been waiting for 117 days with no RC bugs. If it is not unblocked then there will be no udhcpc/udhcpc packages in squeeze (there were in lenny). [I'm subscribed to -release, no need to CC] By reading the changelog, there are changes that could affect D-I, but I don't think they might break it: [ Otavio Salvador ] * [udeb] set executable bit in udhcpc script * [udeb] write a lease file for udhcpc response . [ Frans Pop ] * [udeb] disable CONFIG_CTTYHACK as it's no longer used in D-I. The most unknown effect is probably: [ Bastian Blank ] * New upstream release. ...but after 117 days, we would have known if something had been badly broken as this version is what we have in the daily builds. Otavio, any objections? Sure not; this is safe to be unblocked also because it is included on initrd. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimoqcgfxciryzrxewqsx9chd8p7mvhn6yz3i...@mail.gmail.com
Hints for Debian Installer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello RM team, We'll need another debian-installer build since powerpc is broken; then we can use this opportunity to fix those issues as well. Here goes a set of hints related to d-i: unblock bogl/0.1.18-3.1 unblock choose-mirror/2.32 # please age this one, it lacks few builds unblock console-setup/1.51 unblock gtk+2.0/2.18.6-1 # gtk in testing is already broken for d-i unblock localechooser/2.24 # please age this one Move to auto-section: localization-config Cheers, - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: CDFC6E4F Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLZuwgAAoJEOtw/vPN/G5P/JAP/jnPSPLvjDyPp4TGk561USC9 xfEF8CZM7SnL+ByKvlVt/dOPOIIs9kobwIXcRFn4gbB84RKoC2+kVMR827IjPw7M pdlslQIzAEQJSknowdG3j7Y53s//4LmrA8NC4lX6ep7h9pbu/kTBi1zcUK/rK+Nn KSLZdEKtzUoVQreXFQ4W3ub2uE06i+8sb4loTGM1+YdsM037SX0PFVfBQ2jGXiB1 MOXpc4/r5yKMirKbRswtjAd1HpUylzfdrdYxJMRoAPGMqLX1X5TzOv8dgR8u5IEa CnRSt9XEYW8jVRwPcmex8UkirNsxJgi1trAc0UbcLkzYsUARCGt2oczIl2c5PFb/ g9I7KsznyqduYuqNfqpjW5W8hM+NGy2JuODi1XrEghZBCjJq5HEZTUjVv6nAMnV9 acOP3gmlydFWRKAUtaUtT0hacQ24JiwRjYJhZw4M0lSlyPkpGBz+MxWqoz0MtdKu doY7p0ipCYYQGFPj7RtJv4uHVpyhP26ek8I8st1p0D/iZRkkoA0dlcJAMVQiZeDU qD/93mY8VQAD3UdE0SDisPwlt4rWeUhLv0KxIMNAJqpQo0WmNrSRqxpntncBLvIa hqP5l7dEZo817MsVnfyI68G2u4vS2LaTxbBEMjvMvSeXWmjZmJUqkPfb18hjxDYt jHjh8mVIPdKxN5XIQFji =FY0X -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#567182: gcc: Please add libgcc1-udeb for Debian Installer
Hello, On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote: I'm still not convinced that the (IMO minor) disadvantages of having a udeb in gcc are sufficient to treat gcc different from all other packages that provide udebs. With britney support it won't change anything for GCC maintainers since it will migrate automatically when it is ready (normal rules for testing) so I see no point in making it harder using an extra source. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please let brltty_4.1-3 enter testing
Hello Samuel, On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote: Adam D. Barratt, le Tue 05 Jan 2010 19:17:55 +, a écrit : On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 14:08 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: brltty_4.1-3 contains an important fix (and only that, along disabling java while the build-deps are being fixed) for the Debian Installer, could you let it enter testing to make sure it makes it for the first alpha release? Unfortunately, it also FTBFS on kfreebsd-*; specifically: In file included from ../../Programs/usb_kfreebsd.c:35: ../../Programs/usb_bsd.h: In function 'usbSetTimeout': ../../Programs/usb_bsd.h:34: error: 'USB_SET_TIMEOUT' undeclared (first use in this function) ../../Programs/usb_bsd.h:34: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../../Programs/usb_bsd.h:34: error: for each function it appears in.) and similar for another three USB_ constants. I know, but I was advised to ignore kFreeBSD at the time because porting wasn't so trivial and debian-boot wanted to release asap. That said, since then kFreeBSD started providing a legacy compatibility interface that can be used, shall I upload a version that just adds a patch using it? We're indeed in hurry for releasing however kFreeBSD is considered a release arch however I talked to RM and it is not possible to accept it in testing without it having been built for kFreeBSD so please upload it with the patch you mention and bump the priority of it to get it built and ready for testing soon. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Update of Linux 2.6.30?
Hello Ben, On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote: Although Linux 2.6.31 has been released, it has a number of known regressions and I think we will wait for 2.6.31.1 before uploading to unstable. Most of the kernel team will be meeting in Portland from 22-26 September and I would expect the first upload to be done after that. In the mean time, 2.6.30 has had more stable updates, and there are many other bugs with patches available (the most important being #541307). I propose that we should make another upload of 2.6.30, although this will change the kernel ABI. Please do; this allow us to get rid of the PAT bug :-) -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [stable] Adding bnx2x driver in 5.0.3
Hello dann, On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 4:04 PM, dann frazierda...@debian.org wrote: The bnx2x driver was disabled in lenny due to its use of non-free firmware. I have put together a patch that would reenable this driver in lenny's 2.6.26 kernel, making use of the firmware split-out patch that has gone upstream in Linux 2.6.31-rc releases (and is currently in use in the linux-2.6 2.6.30 packages in sid). Really good news :-) I'd like to see if we can enable the use of this driver in 5.0.3. As far as I can tell, the necessary steps would be: - Update the kernel (obviously) - planned for a p-u upload this week - Backport the necessary changes for firmware-nonfree from sid to add the firmware-bnx2x package - Update kernel-wedge/stable to include bnx2x if available (are there space issues here?) The space usage is neglitable and I think it can be done with a very small risk of regressions. Be sure to use the kernel-wedge of lenny for building it since we've changed kernel-wedge a lot during the 2.6.30 migration and it is not suitable for the lenny usage. - Update d-i in 5.0.3 to incorporate this driver Yes, you got the picture right. I offer help if required. Cheers, -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: unblock fontconfig?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org writes: On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 06:40:19PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: Hi all, fontconfig has been waiting 21 days for migration, perhaps it should be unblocked? No RC bugs were filed during that time. debian-boot, please approve, this is blocked due to a udeb. Ack! - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkpbLSMACgkQLqiZQEml+FUZ9QCfdBwsbCkzsavu8aK+JCAKYB8t qjEAnR8lfNINfu8SIFkgtiTjxoGLx27V =RjIt -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: please unblock libtextwrap 0.1-8 pciutils 1:3.1.3-1 (both with udebs)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Aníbal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org writes: On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 09:33:02AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: please unblock libtextwrap 0.1-8 pciutils 1:3.1.3-1 (both with udebs) Changes: libtextwrap (0.1-8) unstable; urgency=low . * Support cross building Patch by Neil Williams Closes: 480903 pciutils (1:3.1.3-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream version * DH level compatibility is 7 * Fix out-of-date-standards-version * Fix dh-clean-k-is-deprecated ping Ack - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkpbLa4ACgkQLqiZQEml+FUQ1QCgtOu2sn8IqNQmhoXMfddcZkpE SJ4An0ZDcvexIGhxYl90Bfo1seem5Vmd =Sjtm -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 martin f krafft madd...@debian.org writes: Please unblock mdadm 2.6.9-3 to that I can move 3.0 into unstable. Ack - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkpbLcIACgkQLqiZQEml+FViPACdG2XcYbKww7S1EeKs1mIHNa8+ FXsAnjmg4gDef+pU4FVbDukEsomnoPIb =pEr8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: please unblock hdparm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org writes: Hi all, Can hdparm please be unblocked? It is on permanent block since it produces a udeb, even though the udeb is not used by d-i, or within Debian. Ack; it can be added to the auto list. Cheers, - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkpbLekACgkQLqiZQEml+FWqMQCeP7Rrd7TYAvwEi3m5ULFCW4Qt qRUAnifmEM5oBQvqyfJOk4UZEX0eFwX+ =PSCb -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#533091: archive.gpg in amd64 netboot.tar.gz for etch
Hello Luk, On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Luk Claesl...@debian.org wrote: If it's binNMU safe, we could try a binNMU, otherwise it's best to either do a porter NMU if possible or a sourceful upload otherwise. Yeah, binNMU ought to work fine. Please go ahead with that. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Bug#533091: archive.gpg in amd64 netboot.tar.gz for etch
Hello Pascal,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:58 AM, Pascal
Vandeputtedebian-b...@asmodeus.be wrote:
[...]
# ls -al initrd-{amd64,i386}/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 pvdputte pvdputte 4148 2009-06-16 10:42
initrd-amd64/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 pvdputte pvdputte 5801 2009-06-16 10:42
initrd-i386/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg
You can see that the i386 archive.gpg file is clearly larger.
[...]
This is indeed a problem; probably the package were not up to date on
the used mirror :(
RM team,
Is there a way to update the installer in case?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: please unblock libpng 1.2.37-1 pciutils 1:3.1.2-5 (both with udebs)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Aníbal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org writes: please unblock libpng 1.2.37-1 pciutils 1:3.1.2-5 (both with udebs) Changes: libpng (1.2.37-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release Changes: pciutils (1:3.1.2-5) unstable; urgency=medium . * Update pci.ids with snapshot dated 2009-06-02 03:15:01 No objection - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkoywNsACgkQLqiZQEml+FWjvwCfbZ/G+28RySlG8PPs124Q4Fa1 8BAAn3VuSvnx2Bxcuh0jJN5NN1zsFYVI =OWet -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: please allow debian-edu-install 0.675 into testing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@freegeek.org writes: please allow debian-edu-install 0.675 into testing, which is blocked from migrating due to it's udebs. i do not believe the udebs are used in a default install, and thus shouldn't impact debian-installer. No objection - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkoywQcACgkQLqiZQEml+FX6kQCgp70aqVdOiLcEjh4V4nBbiYTs ULIAoLHcd8YF6c8kiDYkunv7xw0/zS7x =Gzd/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Upcoming Lenny Point Release
Hello, On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Holger Levsenhol...@layer-acht.org wrote: Hi, for Debian Edu it would be great if cdebconf would be updated to 0.141 in stable and new d-i initrds would be build, as we are using them directly and are being bitten by #508042, #507372 and #343119. Those bugs were fixed in 0.140, but due to #525209 0.141 is desirable. I'm not sure if it's realistic at all (though the changes are just bugfixes and translation updates), but it would be good to have an answer, so either Debian Edu can use unmodified d-i or we have to fix it ourselves, which would mean branching d-i and a whole lot of more work (for the years to come). I have no problem in prepare that fix for it however it needs a full d-i update to happen. If RM team is OK with it I can take a look at it and prepare the packages during this week. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please unblock atk1.0
2009/4/15 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org: Hi, atk1.0 (which has an udeb) is blocked and cannot enter testing at the moment. Would it be possible to unblock it? BTW, I don’t know whether this is possible, but it would be nice if the rules for udeb migration could be relaxed for a while, given the expected amount of updates. ATM they're really relaxed; more to the end of mounth they should be more restrict again since we'll probably be working at alpha1 images. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Permission to migrate cdebconf-terminal/0.4 for the directfb transition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es writes: Hello, I ve just pushed the directfb transition to testing, and I m looking into pushing the needed udeb packages as well (libcairo-directfb2-udeb, libgtk-directfb-2.0-0-udeb, etc.) Most of these belong to regular packages, i.e. not udeb-only. There are however two udeb-only packages. cdebconf-entropy has the same version in testing and unstable, so pushing the Bin-NMU should be just fine. Yes, all fine. cdebconf-terminal also needs pushing, though, but it s at 0.2 in testing and 0.4 in unstable. Is it okay to migrate it? If it is not, I ll migrate all the rest, and do a Bin-NMU of cdebconf-terminal/0.2 in testing. Yes. I belive we'll start to stabilize the installer after some work during April so don't need to worry about it right now. Please sync it. - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAknQEbUACgkQLqiZQEml+FUO0QCfZJh0dJoywxXaQqhsIdWsq+YQ YvgAoJuq1Xsu3jjaiZbJ/AhNfTWQp1yo =So0L -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: upcoming point releases
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com wrote: I'd like to add support for the D-Link DNS-323 to the upcoming point release: these patches were available before lenny was out, have been tested in the meantime by a number of people and are very small and low impact. The tools and kernel needed to support this device are already in lenny, so we just need to add some patches to the installer: - Add DNS-323 support to oldsys-preseed - Generate DNS-323 installer images. Can someone review these patches and give me the OK to apply? I see no problem on the attached patches and I belive them are low risk enough for us to add them. minix-modules is available so I see no problem et all. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please unblock emdebian-tools
Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes: Neil Williams wrote: Could emdebian-tools be unblocked please so that 1.6.0 can migrate into testing in a few days time? unblocked (Is there a different way to do this - iirc it is only because of the udeb which is not incorporated into d-i directly at this time - it's only used when d-i is used by Emdebian pre-seeding. I generally upload a new version of emdebian-tools quite soon after each previous version migrates into testing. Do I need to put the udeb into a different source package? It doesn't actually change more than once per release cycle.) Currently it's the only way, though we're working on changing that. Neil, I belive that the udeb could have the own source package so it could make your life easier (and our too). I second the idea of having it in a specific source package. -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: upcoming point releases
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes: Le dimanche 22 mars 2009 à 20:26 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit : Please have a look at the respective websites [0] [1] [2] for a more or less up-to-date status of the preparations. The installer team requested that gtk+ 2.12.12 made it soon enough for the d-i update, but I see it is still pending. Do you have any news about it? Yes SRM team, please handle it ASAP since we could get builds done in meanwhile for testing. - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAknG/fgACgkQLqiZQEml+FXz3QCeKn/dNsSjArMkCoAEHcd/8DWo +MoAoL6P2IKfoPeNnky4QSisymbJJUQc =ONNF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please unblock kbd/1.15-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes: Michael Schutte wrote: Hi -release, Please let kbd 1.15-1 (which builds kbd-udeb) migrate to testing. Cc-ing d-i list to see if it's ok to unblock it now. [...] Ack - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkmxgxcACgkQLqiZQEml+FWHxgCfU74Wh+iV34b+ApsRb+S+394j 6K0AoJeO6UhwpaI1cvhO+MHz6+8nEij+ =LRiW -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [RFC] Debian Installer related scripts suitable for moving
Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es writes: * Otavio Salvador [Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:10:34 -0300]: Hello, Hi, RM people has get in touch with me asking for which script we consider suitable for moving into release.debian.org. I'll note that our goal was/is to do whatever is needed to make your situation better in this regard. I think it was you who suggested this move would make things better for you, that's why I brought it back. We were at that time talking about the testing package status not being up to date and then we considered it was more logical to move it to a more appropriated place. IIRC this was the basis of our talking at that moment. Just clarifying this is not a Release Team must do it all! move. Sure. We're not considering it this way. Christian writes: Still, having it run under a developer account is a small weakness So, another option would be for d-i to have its own role account, accessible for d-i RMs and other selected people, and that way you can be in charge of maintaining your own scripts. I belive it works for us. Now, two things: It was make clear to RM team that we need to be able to fix the scripts by ourselfs and I belive that it shouldn't be a problem. Well, if the scripts are going to be run on ftp-master under the release role account, I don't think it's possible to grant you direct modification access *to the code*. So, in this regard, this indeed adds a further level of indirection, and if what you want is to be able to commit to the VCS and have the next run pick up that code without human intervention, maybe you should consider the d-i role acount route. OTOH, for scripts that obtain data from the archive, I can easily provide the initial code attacking the projectb database (rather than the mirror), and the code is public, and patches should be fairly fast to integrate. Additionally, if there are scripts that work against a static list of packages (rather than, say, a dynamic list like all packages providing udebs), then *that static list* can be fetched from the d-i SVN repo, for example, which should account for most of the updates needed, once the code is stable. So, really, please think it over, talk with us about which are your goals and constraints, and we try to figure out what works best for everybody, okay? Personally I belive that, after a small period of fixing, those scripts should ramain mostly unmodified for long time. I don't think we'd need to be able to push changes for next run. Most of things will appear as soon as we do the switch and then we'll be in touch to fix the remaning issues and getting it in a stable code. After that, I do belive we can use RM people as a proxy for getting things fixed. Even more due our nice collaboration we've been doing during Lenny and this new development cycle. The only ones that come to my head are: 1. testing summary (http://merkel.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/testing-summary.html) 2. building summary (http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/build-logs.html) There is also http://ftp-master.debian.org/d-i. Which has a planned revamp for ourselves, and I will move it to release.d.o at the same time. Yes but this output could be merged into the testing-summary. And, regarding #1 above, I confirm what I said on IRC: I am not able to maintain that, plus it doesn't work against the projectb database, so I'd rewrite it into something I can maintain: python + SQL + html templates. I have no objection on that. I'm used to Python and SQL and can help fixing things if required. So, I'll wait to hear from you regarding all of the above. I'll repeat that our goal is to make things better for you, and that you have to help us figure out what that entails. Sure. Before you start working on the scripts, give some time for people to comment. Cheers, -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
[RFC] Debian Installer related scripts suitable for moving
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, RM people has get in touch with me asking for which script we consider suitable for moving into release.debian.org. The only ones that come to my head are: 1. testing summary (http://merkel.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/testing-summary.html) 2. building summary (http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/build-logs.html) It was make clear to RM team that we need to be able to fix the scripts by ourselfs and I belive that it shouldn't be a problem. I'd like to know if someone belives that any other script should be moved or do not agree with the moving of any of the scripts above. Please people, comment on that. Cheers, - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkmsZ2kACgkQLqiZQEml+FVtvgCdE7+y7js0eAF43Bsno58WYml9 BJMAnilOdkL1pE36Zvd/VJHImfyS92KH =gslP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please unblock glib2.0 and gtk+2.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes: Hi, glib2.0 and gtk+2.0 should be ready to migrate to squeeze today. Since they contain udebs, they need manual handling. Could you please unblock them? Ack; since major issues has been solve I belive we're ok to go with it and get it more tested. Besides it needs to be solved to allow us to move 5.0.1 updates further. After that, the road is open for GTK+ 2.14 in unstable and GTK+ 2.12.12 in lenny, as discussed before. Ack. - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkmpcsEACgkQLqiZQEml+FXAswCeJSzujzjlt8/lmNFESiSCRjMn ax4An00yTgEB3RAB/qvhAVirE74zKykJ =R9qu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please unblock glib2.0 and gtk+2.0
Luk Claes l...@debian.org writes: Otavio Salvador wrote: Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes: Hi, glib2.0 and gtk+2.0 should be ready to migrate to squeeze today. Since they contain udebs, they need manual handling. Could you please unblock them? Ack; since major issues has been solve I belive we're ok to go with it and get it more tested. Besides it needs to be solved to allow us to move 5.0.1 updates further. After that, the road is open for GTK+ 2.14 in unstable and GTK+ 2.12.12 in lenny, as discussed before. Ack. unblocked What about pixman, cairo and pango1.0? Those can go too; we're not really worring a lot about squeeze installer in that moment since we're still not near of a installer release. I'll try to look at other blocked packages and send a list of the ones that could be hinted too. -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: please unblock mdadm 2.6.8-12-gb47dff6-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:33 AM, martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote: please unblock mdadm 2.6.8-12-gb47dff6-2 PS: why are udeb-providers blocked right after a stable release? They are always blocked (before, after and during the freeze) so that the installer team has to approve each unblock. CCing -boot. Ack - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkmqA+UACgkQLqiZQEml+FWtGACgiA7oD7ue0bhsxDetmyNYUQmV 1UcAn213iAVqDlx8aPzgYvx7G/ZPum52 =LHBw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: please approve / unblock libpng/1.2.35-1 (it has a udeb)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Aníbal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org writes: please approve / unblock libpng/1.2.35-1 Closes: 486415 516256 Changes: libpng (1.2.35-1) unstable; urgency=high . * New upstream release - http://secunia.com/advisories/33970/ Fix a vulnerability reported by Tavis Ormandy in which some arrays of pointers are not initialized prior to using malloc to define the pointers. Closes: #516256 - http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-5907 The png_check_keyword function in pngwutil.c in libpng, might allow context-dependent attackers to set the value of an arbitrary memory location to zero via vectors involving creation of crafted PNG files with keywords, related to an implicit cast of the '\0' character constant to a NULL pointer. * Don't build libpng3 when binary-indep target is not called. Closes: #486415 Ack. - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkmi4BUACgkQLqiZQEml+FX/WACfX4WvNGG3JLZb4dJcGtShPdtv 8vUAn1Ggh3+OQzBJSKjvEHF5vugnewjx =41YI -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: please approve / unblock xfsprogs/2.10.2-2 (udeb)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Aníbal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org writes: please approve / unblock xfsprogs/2.10.2-2 (udeb) Closes: 514072 Changes: xfsprogs (2.10.2-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Remove --enable-lib64=yes in Makefile (closes: #514072) Ack. - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkmi4CEACgkQLqiZQEml+FUWKgCgkh+7iLy8fKqkxM9dKZ5MZ/wZ n8QAoJmhVuVF1brtUxw+LBiT5nhiqqRU =LQmM -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: please approve / unblock pciutils/1:3.0.3-2 (udeb)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Aníbal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org writes: please approve / unblock pciutils/1:3.0.3-2 (udeb) Changes: pciutils (1:3.0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Upload to unstable * Put back Matthew Wilcox in uploaders * Update pci.ids with snapshot dated 2009-02-14 03:15:02 Ack. - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkmi4C8ACgkQLqiZQEml+FXMsgCglZ2BpTpU2iKpwVGAuZo9uGQz /BwAoLziTziJTElSy9cCEpwc7YO2nP+9 =xJVY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Please unblock libsdl1.2/1.2.13-4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net writes: On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:58:59AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Hi, Could you please allow libsdl1.2/1.2.13-4 to migrate into testing, if it is ok from a d-i PoV? It has no RC bug and is waiting for more than 100 days old. Any new on that? -- Aurelien JarnoGPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net Ack - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkmfIcoACgkQLqiZQEml+FXGugCgl9fHXAKdJbknYacHSiLZJRo9 gtYAnRIR2E73IibkCymbj2xaFV05eOV8 =fnK+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: please unblock klibc 1.5.15-1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 maximilian attems m...@stro.at writes: newer upstream version fixes fstype ext4 recognotion, plus minor bunch of stuff. No objection on a side note this version still saw a patch by ths applied. missing him!?! :( - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkmciewACgkQLqiZQEml+FXzEACfXYSlfv7YTW4gXvl6uSkwWCdP NCcAn2xwJFor3NQ1kr34ilS07Aglhh6h =8Hli -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes: ... * Broken graphical installer, until someone updates our GTK+ DirectFB patches ... Is all of that OK with the release team? - From d-i POV this is a serious issue since we will not allowed to test the graphical installer. I'd much prefer to hold it until the DirectFB patches are ready. - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkmYWDwACgkQLqiZQEml+FU3FQCgu7HoASRQ86u0eRK9ot1VPRT8 E/IAnAtvP2ytPuTbIBKJ/xh06qd8gnax =+c2p -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: GTK+ update proposal for stable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes: Hi, we’ve been having a new version of GTK+ targeted to lenny ready for a while, but refrained from uploading it because of the impact on the installer. Without testing the binaries myself I think this is the best time to do the update since we'll need to do a debian-installer update for 5.0.1 due the gpg key updating. However we'd need to check if it doesn't include regressions at directfb support even though being a bugfix release the risk is low. If the release team agrees in principle, I need of course broad testing of this package on lenny systems before even thinking of including it in a point release. Packages are available there: http://malsain.org/~joss/debian/gtk+/ - From d-i POV we just need to do tests with those binaries to avoid regressions; we could coodinate that together so we could give it a try and if we find any regression deal with it before doing ahead with the uploads. However I'd wait for SRM team agreement about it before start any test for it. Cheers, - -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - - E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br - - Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAkmYWq0ACgkQLqiZQEml+FX0iwCfYeo82PAL7ScUHv3tB2OQbHA2 wecAoL45+1cTvXKBOGS7jHR4zBhOiuOU =2Io0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
