Bug#683303: unblock: kvirc/4:4.1.3+20111124.svn5988-2

2012-09-12 Thread Raúl Sánchez Siles
  Hi!

  Thank you very much for the approval. Since I received the freeze exception 
confirmation I've been searching for an sponsor since I don't have upload 
rights.

  After some days pinging on several places I resorted to sponsorship-requests 
procedure though BTS. The bug number for this is: 687458 I'll let you know 
anyway when anything relevant happens.

  I hope someone hands over this.

  Regards,

-- 
 Raúl Sánchez Siles
-Proud Debian user-
Linux registered user #416098


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#683303: unblock: kvirc/4:4.1.3+20111124.svn5988-2

2012-08-04 Thread Raúl Sánchez Siles
El Sábado, 4 de agosto de 2012, Julien Cristau escribió:
 On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 18:31:39 +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
[...]
 
 Care to send a non-reversed debdiff?  That makes it kinda painful to
 read.

  Oops! Sorry. Find it attached now.
 
 Cheers,
 Julien

  Regards,

-- 
 Raúl Sánchez Siles
-Proud Debian user-
Linux registered user #416098
diff -Nru kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/changelog kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/changelog
--- kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/changelog	2011-11-24 13:26:20.0 +0100
+++ kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/changelog	2012-07-19 21:56:22.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+kvirc (4:4.1.3+2024.svn5988-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Updated debhelper build-depends to better cope with multiarch.
+  * Fix must not be Multi-Arch: same kvirc is Multi-Arch: foreign
+(Closes: #658058)
+  * Actually provide valid -dbg package. Added 30_upstream_build-g
+  * Fix Hardening flags missing. Applying suggested changes.
+(Closes: #669189) Thanks to Simon Ruderich.
+
+ -- Raúl Sánchez Siles rasas...@gmail.com  Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:56:08 +0200
+
 kvirc (4:4.1.3+2024.svn5988-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   The Land Equilibrium release.
diff -Nru kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/control kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/control
--- kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/control	2011-09-29 16:24:58.0 +0200
+++ kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/control	2012-07-18 18:09:05.0 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Source: kvirc
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 8.9.4),
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9),
  cmake (= 2.8.4+dfsg.1-3),
  kdelibs5-dev,
  libperl-dev,
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
  ${shlibs:Depends},
  ${misc:Depends}
 Suggests: kvirc-dbg (= ${binary:Version})
-Multi-Arch: same
+Multi-Arch: foreign
 Description: KDE-based next generation IRC client with module support
  A highly configurable graphical IRC client with an MDI interface,
  built-in scripting language, support for IRC DCC, drag  drop file
diff -Nru kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/patches/00_hardening_upstream.patch kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/patches/00_hardening_upstream.patch
--- kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/patches/00_hardening_upstream.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/patches/00_hardening_upstream.patch	2012-07-18 18:09:05.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+Description: Use build flags from environment (dpkg-buildflags).
+ Necessary for hardening flags.
+Author: Simon Ruderich si...@ruderich.org
+Last-Update: 2012-04-17
+
+--- kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988.orig/CMakeLists.txt
 kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/CMakeLists.txt
+@@ -220,8 +220,8 @@ ELSE()
+ 		ENDIF()
+ 		IF(CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_GNUCXX)
+ 			#force gdb options
+-			SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG --no-enforce-eh-specs -pipe --exec-charset=UTF-8 --input-charset=UTF-8 --no-implement-inlines --unit-at-a-time --fast-math)
+-			SET(CMAKE_C_FLAGS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG --no-enforce-eh-specs -pipe --exec-charset=UTF-8 --input-charset=UTF-8 --no-implement-inlines --unit-at-a-time --fast-math)
++			SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS ${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG --no-enforce-eh-specs -pipe --exec-charset=UTF-8 --input-charset=UTF-8 --no-implement-inlines --unit-at-a-time --fast-math)
++			SET(CMAKE_C_FLAGS ${CMAKE_C_FLAGS} -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG --no-enforce-eh-specs -pipe --exec-charset=UTF-8 --input-charset=UTF-8 --no-implement-inlines --unit-at-a-time --fast-math)
+ 			INCLUDE(CheckCXXCompilerFlag)
+ 			CHECK_CXX_COMPILER_FLAG(-fvisibility-inlines-hidden CXX_HAS_VIH_FLAG)
+ 			#gcc doesn't support visibility on PE/win32
diff -Nru kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/patches/30_upstream_build-g kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/patches/30_upstream_build-g
--- kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/patches/30_upstream_build-g	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/patches/30_upstream_build-g	2012-07-18 18:09:05.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+Description: Added compiler flag generating debug information.
+  With the current provided cmake flags, no debug information was generated in
+  the compilation. The proper flag is added to either CMAKE_C_FLAGS and
+  CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS.
+  .
+  This patch should be forwarded upstream.
+Author: Raúl Sánchez Siles rasas...@gmail.com
+Last-Update: 2012-03-15
+Origin: vendor, http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-kde/kde-extras/kvirc.git;a=blob_plain;f=debian/patches/30_upstream_build-g;hb=HEAD
+Forwarded: no
+---
+--- a/CMakeLists.txt
 b/CMakeLists.txt
+@@ -220,8 +220,8 @@
+ 		ENDIF()
+ 		IF(CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_GNUCXX)
+ 			#force gdb options
+-			SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS ${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG --no-enforce-eh-specs -pipe --exec-charset=UTF-8 --input-charset=UTF-8 --no-implement-inlines --unit-at-a-time --fast-math)
+-			SET(CMAKE_C_FLAGS ${CMAKE_C_FLAGS} -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG --no-enforce-eh-specs -pipe

Bug#683303: unblock: kvirc/4:4.1.3+20111124.svn5988-2

2012-07-30 Thread Raúl Sánchez Siles
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package kvirc

This is a resend/summary of [0] according to [1].

kvirc (4:4.1.3+2024.svn5988-2) unstable; urgency=low

   * Updated debhelper build-depends to better cope with multiarch.
   * Fix must not be Multi-Arch: same kvirc is Multi-Arch: foreign
 (Closes: #658058)
   * Actually provide valid -dbg package. Added 30_upstream_build-g
   * Fix Hardening flags missing. Applying suggested changes.
 (Closes: #669189) Thanks to Simon Ruderich.

Full source at [2], debdiff attached.

unblock kvirc/4:4.1.3+2024.svn5988-2

[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg01468.html
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/07/msg4.html
[2] 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kvirc/kvirc_4.1.3+2024.svn5988-2.dsc

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.4-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
diff -Nru kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/changelog kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/changelog
--- kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/changelog	2012-07-19 21:56:22.0 +0200
+++ kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/changelog	2011-11-24 13:26:20.0 +0100
@@ -1,14 +1,3 @@
-kvirc (4:4.1.3+2024.svn5988-2) unstable; urgency=low
-
-  * Updated debhelper build-depends to better cope with multiarch.
-  * Fix must not be Multi-Arch: same kvirc is Multi-Arch: foreign
-(Closes: #658058)
-  * Actually provide valid -dbg package. Added 30_upstream_build-g
-  * Fix Hardening flags missing. Applying suggested changes.
-(Closes: #669189) Thanks to Simon Ruderich.
-
- -- Raúl Sánchez Siles rasas...@gmail.com  Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:56:08 +0200
-
 kvirc (4:4.1.3+2024.svn5988-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   The Land Equilibrium release.
diff -Nru kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/control kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/control
--- kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/control	2012-07-18 18:09:05.0 +0200
+++ kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/control	2011-09-29 16:24:58.0 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Source: kvirc
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9),
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 8.9.4),
  cmake (= 2.8.4+dfsg.1-3),
  kdelibs5-dev,
  libperl-dev,
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
  ${shlibs:Depends},
  ${misc:Depends}
 Suggests: kvirc-dbg (= ${binary:Version})
-Multi-Arch: foreign
+Multi-Arch: same
 Description: KDE-based next generation IRC client with module support
  A highly configurable graphical IRC client with an MDI interface,
  built-in scripting language, support for IRC DCC, drag  drop file
diff -Nru kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/patches/00_hardening_upstream.patch kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/patches/00_hardening_upstream.patch
--- kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/patches/00_hardening_upstream.patch	2012-07-18 18:09:05.0 +0200
+++ kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/patches/00_hardening_upstream.patch	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
@@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
-Description: Use build flags from environment (dpkg-buildflags).
- Necessary for hardening flags.
-Author: Simon Ruderich si...@ruderich.org
-Last-Update: 2012-04-17
-
 kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988.orig/CMakeLists.txt
-+++ kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/CMakeLists.txt
-@@ -220,8 +220,8 @@ ELSE()
- 		ENDIF()
- 		IF(CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_GNUCXX)
- 			#force gdb options
--			SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG --no-enforce-eh-specs -pipe --exec-charset=UTF-8 --input-charset=UTF-8 --no-implement-inlines --unit-at-a-time --fast-math)
--			SET(CMAKE_C_FLAGS -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG --no-enforce-eh-specs -pipe --exec-charset=UTF-8 --input-charset=UTF-8 --no-implement-inlines --unit-at-a-time --fast-math)
-+			SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS ${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG --no-enforce-eh-specs -pipe --exec-charset=UTF-8 --input-charset=UTF-8 --no-implement-inlines --unit-at-a-time --fast-math)
-+			SET(CMAKE_C_FLAGS ${CMAKE_C_FLAGS} -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG --no-enforce-eh-specs -pipe --exec-charset=UTF-8 --input-charset=UTF-8 --no-implement-inlines --unit-at-a-time --fast-math)
- 			INCLUDE(CheckCXXCompilerFlag)
- 			CHECK_CXX_COMPILER_FLAG(-fvisibility-inlines-hidden CXX_HAS_VIH_FLAG)
- 			#gcc doesn't support visibility on PE/win32
diff -Nru kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/patches/30_upstream_build-g kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/patches/30_upstream_build-g
--- kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/patches/30_upstream_build-g	2012-07-18 18:09:05.0 +0200
+++ kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/patches/30_upstream_build-g	1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-Description: Added compiler flag generating debug information

Re: Request for kvirc freeze exception.

2012-07-23 Thread Raúl Sánchez Siles
 Hi!

  (Debian KDE Extras Team mail address corrected)

El Jueves, 12 de julio de 2012, Cyril Brulebois escribió:
 Hello,
 
 and thanks for checking with us.
 
 Raúl Sánchez Siles rasas...@gmail.com (06/07/2012):
Since I don't have upload rights I requested regular uploaders
  first, then kde- extras team for sponsoring. The situation was such
  that I failed to manage time left to freeze properly and upload didn't
  happen. Moreover upstream released the 4.2.0 version, which I'm
  proposing now and which differs slightly with my sponsoring requests.
  I'm asking now considering kvirc package 4:4.2.0-1 into wheezy, Taking
  into account [2], I'd like to support my petition on the following
  
  points:
· Bugs 658058 and 669189 matches multiarch and hardening flags release
goals, respectively.
 
 We could consider that.
 
· All packages generated are priority optional or extra, and
  
  therefore unlikely to harm any other parts of the system. There is no
  other debian package, excluding those generated by kvirc source
  package, that depends on it.
 
 Noted, but that alone won't make us give you carte blanche.
 
· New upstream release include a very high density of translation
  updates. For instance, full debdiff [3] shows 646 files changed, 99946
  insertions(+), 72202 deletions(-) whereas debdiff [4], excluding po
  dir shows 305 files changed, 5472 insertions(+), 6656 deletions(-)
 
 Even excluding translation updates (which is at least for now very OK
 according to our freeze policy), that's still huge.
 
· New upstream release starts 4.2.x major versions, Historically
  there have been 1 or 2 upstream minor revisions which we (debian) may
  profit from, specially as regards with security or serious issues. If
  4.2.0 is not deployed in Wheezy our base version will be
  4.1.3+2024.svn5988-1, based on a development snapshot. From the
  maintainers point of view, basing on a stable release is more than
  convenient.
 
 I can understand that, but that's unfortunate it got released so late as
 far as the wheezy freeze is concerned.
 
· One extra cosmetic-point is that this upload means zero bug
  package.  Something that I guess every package maintainer would like
  to see for his packaged stuff :)
 
 Sorry, but totally irrelevant. :p
 
 
 To summarize, not sure what to advise for this package. Surely the
 proposed changes are much larger than what I'd like at this point of the
 release cycle.
 
 Mraw,
 KiBi.

  Thanks for your answer. My apologise for the delay, vacancy were on its way.

  Given your answer and provided there are no other opinions here I decided to 
prepare a package[0] backporting just the points considered. This is the 
changelog:

 kvirc (4:4.1.3+2024.svn5988-2) unstable; urgency=low

   * Updated debhelper build-depends to better cope with multiarch.
   * Fix must not be Multi-Arch: same kvirc is Multi-Arch: foreign
 (Closes: #658058)
   * Actually provide valid -dbg package. Added 30_upstream_build-g
   * Fix Hardening flags missing. Applying suggested changes.
 (Closes: #669189) Thanks to Simon Ruderich.

[0] 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kvirc/kvirc_4.1.3+2024.svn5988-2.dsc

  Please, let me know if this approach is acceptable to you and if I can do 
anything else to help about this issue.

  Regards,

-- 
 Raúl Sánchez Siles
-Proud Debian user-
Linux registered user #416098
diff -Nru kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/changelog kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/changelog
--- kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/changelog	2012-07-19 21:56:22.0 +0200
+++ kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/changelog	2011-11-24 13:26:20.0 +0100
@@ -1,14 +1,3 @@
-kvirc (4:4.1.3+2024.svn5988-2) unstable; urgency=low
-
-  * Updated debhelper build-depends to better cope with multiarch.
-  * Fix must not be Multi-Arch: same kvirc is Multi-Arch: foreign
-(Closes: #658058)
-  * Actually provide valid -dbg package. Added 30_upstream_build-g
-  * Fix Hardening flags missing. Applying suggested changes.
-(Closes: #669189) Thanks to Simon Ruderich.
-
- -- Raúl Sánchez Siles rasas...@gmail.com  Thu, 19 Jul 2012 21:56:08 +0200
-
 kvirc (4:4.1.3+2024.svn5988-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   The Land Equilibrium release.
diff -Nru kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/control kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/control
--- kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/control	2012-07-18 18:09:05.0 +0200
+++ kvirc-4.1.3+2024.svn5988/debian/control	2011-09-29 16:24:58.0 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Source: kvirc
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 9),
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 8.9.4),
  cmake (= 2.8.4+dfsg.1-3),
  kdelibs5-dev,
  libperl-dev,
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
  ${shlibs:Depends},
  ${misc:Depends}
 Suggests: kvirc-dbg (= ${binary:Version})
-Multi-Arch: foreign
+Multi-Arch: same
 Description: KDE-based next generation IRC client with module support
  A highly configurable graphical IRC client with an MDI

Request for kvirc freeze exception.

2012-07-05 Thread Raúl Sánchez Siles
  Dear Release Managers:

  About a month ago I updated the kvirc package[0][1] to a newer version 
according 
to the following changelog entries:

kvirc (4:4.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
  * New upstream release.
  * Updated debhelper build-depends to better cope with multiarch.
  * Fix must not be Multi-Arch: same kvirc is Multi-Arch: foreign
(Closes: #658058)
  * Actually provide valid -dbg package. Added 30_upstream_build-g
  * Fix Hardening flags missing. Applying suggested changes.
(Closes: #669189) Thanks to Simon Ruderich.

  Since I don't have upload rights I requested regular uploaders first, then 
kde-
extras team for sponsoring. The situation was such that I failed to manage time 
left to freeze properly and upload didn't happen. Moreover upstream released 
the 
4.2.0 version, which I'm proposing now and which differs slightly with my 
sponsoring requests. I'm asking now considering kvirc package 4:4.2.0-1 into 
wheezy, Taking into account [2], I'd like to support my petition on the 
following points:

  · Bugs 658058 and 669189 matches multiarch and hardening flags release goals, 
respectively.
  · All packages generated are priority optional or extra, and therefore 
unlikely to harm any other parts of the system. There is no other debian 
package, excluding those generated by kvirc source package, that depends on it.
  · New upstream release include a very high density of translation updates. 
For 
instance, full debdiff [3] shows 646 files changed, 99946 insertions(+), 72202 
deletions(-) whereas debdiff [4], excluding po dir shows 305 files changed, 
5472 
insertions(+), 6656 deletions(-)
  · New upstream release starts 4.2.x major versions, Historically there have 
been 1 or 2 upstream minor revisions which we (debian) may profit from, 
specially 
as regards with security or serious issues. If 4.2.0 is not deployed in Wheezy 
our base version will be 4.1.3+2024.svn5988-1, based on a development 
snapshot. From the maintainers point of view, basing on a stable release is 
more 
than convenient.
  · One extra cosmetic-point is that this upload means zero bug package. 
Something that I guess every package maintainer would like to see for his 
packaged stuff :)

  I also offer to carry out any suggestion you may deem important in order to 
get 
package in shape for wheezy. In other words, I appreciate your advise on how to 
proceed.

  Thanks and best regards,

[0] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-kde/kde-extras/kvirc.git
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kvirc/kvirc_4.2.0-1.dsc
[2] http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
[3] http://trismegisto.no-ip.org/incoming/kvirc_testing-4.2.0.debdiff.xz 
(11879KiB uncompressed)
[4] http://trismegisto.no-ip.org/incoming/kvirc_testing-4.2.0-nopo.debdiff.xz 
(848KiB uncompressed) 



-- 
 Raúl Sánchez Siles
-Proud Debian user-
Linux registered user #416098


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [SRM] kvirc 4:4.0.4-1 for stable-proposed-updates [2nd attempt]

2011-05-10 Thread Raúl Sánchez Siles
  Hi Adam (et al.)

El Martes, 10 de Mayo de 2011, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
 Hi,
 
 On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 01:15 +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
Not strictly Monday (here) but at least I have a diff, available at
[0].
 
 Thanks for that, and apologies for not getting back to you sooner.

  I bet you had some other important things to deal with ;)
 
  I
  tried to remove all unnecessary changes from the former big diff. There
  are still some minor changes that could be added, but I preferred to go
  for the simplest version in order to have an assessment about the
  feasibility of this kind of patch. If you deem this, or something very
  similar, can be accepted I'll go on with the testing which shouldn't be
  very different to what we are testing right now.
  
To be honest skimming the patch took quite a while (as you may have
already
  
  noticed) and sure this is not a reason to accept it. What I'm trying to
  say is that I don't mind spending some more time on this and have it in
  shape for a Stable release which was our aim from the beginning.
 
 The updated diff is much more manageable; thanks.  Given the brevity of
 the changelog, would it be possible to tie the changes down to related
 bug reports, git commits, or something similar?  I did notice that some
 of the changes have ticket IDs included in the comments, but there's
 quite a number which don't.

  So far I've double checked the diff and seems I haven't hopefully overlooked 
any fixes. Regarding your traceability request I'll try my best to link those. 
I'll take a look at the changes with traceability in mind and I'll give you a 
time estimate when I'm ready.

  I've also have been running the proposed version on a Squeeze system and 
haven't seen any relevant issue so far.
  
 
 Regards,
 
 Adam

  Same...

-- 
 Raúl Sánchez Siles
-Proud Debian user-
Linux registered user #416098


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [SRM] kvirc 4:4.0.4-1 for stable-proposed-updates [2nd attempt]

2011-05-02 Thread Raúl Sánchez Siles
  Hello (again):

El Lunes, 25 de Abril de 2011, Raúl Sánchez Siles escribió:
   Hello:
 
 On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 04:58:26PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
  Hi,
  
  On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 19:39 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
   On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 15:13 +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
  We assume that you agree or at least you will consider translation
  changes.
   
   Assuming they're updated translations and apply to whatever set of
   changes we end up finally considering, we'll certainly look at them. 
   We tend not to add new translations but from the debdiff they all look
   like updates (fwiw, historically we've not really accepted updated
   translations either).
   
  Our plan is to work out a new diff that excludes these changes,
  we'll let you know

as soon as we have it ready for review. It's probably expected before
next week.
   
   Thanks, and for caring about fixing kvirc in Debian stable.
  
  Is there an updated ETA for that new diff?
 
   Thanks for your interest in this issue. I apologize for the longish
 delay. It's certainly not being an easy task, but I'm working on it. I'll
 need some more time, my previous estimate was obviously very optimistic.
 My figures now are at least a week more for a neat/tidy diff and then
 one more week for testing.
 
   I'm not intending to tightly engage this schedule since I'm having some
 real life overhead, but I'll try harder this time. Thanks for the
 patience.
 
   Regards,
 
  Regards,
  
  Adam

  Not strictly Monday (here) but at least I have a diff, available at [0]. I 
tried to remove all unnecessary changes from the former big diff. There are 
still some minor changes that could be added, but I preferred to go for the 
simplest version in order to have an assessment about the feasibility of this 
kind of patch. If you deem this, or something very similar, can be accepted 
I'll go on with the testing which shouldn't be very different to what we are 
testing right now.

  To be honest skimming the patch took quite a while (as you may have already 
noticed) and sure this is not a reason to accept it. What I'm trying to say is 
that I don't mind spending some more time on this and have it in shape for a 
Stable release which was our aim from the beginning.

[0] http://trismegisto.no-ip.org/incoming/kvirc_4.0.2-4.0.4_b.debdiff.lzma

  Regards,

-- 
 Raúl Sánchez Siles
-Proud Debian user-
Linux registered user #416098


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [SRM] kvirc 4:4.0.4-1 for stable-proposed-updates [2nd attempt]

2011-04-25 Thread Raúl Sánchez Siles
  Hello:

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 04:58:26PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 19:39 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
  On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 15:13 +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
 We assume that you agree or at least you will consider translation 
   changes.
  
  Assuming they're updated translations and apply to whatever set of
  changes we end up finally considering, we'll certainly look at them.  We
  tend not to add new translations but from the debdiff they all look like
  updates (fwiw, historically we've not really accepted updated
  translations either).
  
 Our plan is to work out a new diff that excludes these changes, we'll 
   let you know
   as soon as we have it ready for review. It's probably expected before 
   next week.
  
  Thanks, and for caring about fixing kvirc in Debian stable.
 
 Is there an updated ETA for that new diff?

  Thanks for your interest in this issue. I apologize for the longish delay.
It's certainly not being an easy task, but I'm working on it. I'll need some
more time, my previous estimate was obviously very optimistic. My figures now
are at least a week more for a neat/tidy diff and then one more week for
testing.

  I'm not intending to tightly engage this schedule since I'm having some real
life overhead, but I'll try harder this time. Thanks for the patience.

  Regards,
 
 Regards,
 
 Adam
 

-- 
Raúl Sánchez Siles


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110425155944.GG7550@trismegisto.universo



Re: [SRM] kvirc 4:4.0.4-1 for stable-proposed-updates [2nd attempt]

2011-03-31 Thread Raúl Sánchez Siles
  Hi Adam,

  Thanks for taking the time to tackle this.

On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:29:01PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Thu, March 31, 2011 10:54, you wrote:
  I'm a co-maintainer of KVIrc and upstream has just released a bugfix
  release for their stable branch (4.0). Debian Stable has 4.0.2 but
  4.0.4 fixes some serious problems:
  CRASH r4795 fix for a crash when opening join channels widget
  CRASH  #878 Crash by fuzzing
  CRASH  #879 Another crash through fuzzing
  REGR  #1010 Channellist Background problem with Gnome
  CRASH r5289 fix for a crash in /exec (related to #0164)
  REGR  #1068 Perl was updated to 5.12.2 +latest Kvirc (SVN)
  CRASH #1093 crash on /list
  CRASH r5476 fix for a crash in regchan.showlist()
  CRASH #1098 Crash while pasting new topic over old topic in topic bar
  REGR  r5576 backported relevant patches to fix addon installation
 
 From a quick scan through the above list, many of the changes sound okay
 in principle although, for example, the perl 5.12 changes aren't really
 relevant as squeeze does not (and will not) contain perl 5.12.

   We'll analyse the situation as with perl regards,
 
  and several translation updates. No other changes (except a few updated
  meta files, like the splash screen, some Windows/Mac-OS-X-only stuff which
  isn't affecting us but I didn't feel would warrant a repacking and some
  formatting changes) where made, as the debdiff at [0] shows
 [...]
  [0]
  http://dev.carbon-project.org/debian/kvirc/kvirc_4.0.2-4.0.4.debdiff.xz
 
 Having excluded the .po and .pot files, I'm still left with a diff of
 
 109 files changed, 1804 insertions(+), 1407 deletions(-)
 
 which is higher than we'd normally look at for a stable update.  A good
 proportion of this is presumably the formatting changes which you
 referred to.  However, many of these appear to be of this style:
 
 -   KviEngineListBoxItem::KviEngineListBoxItem(KviTalListWidget *
 lb,KviCryptEngineDescription * d,const char * modName)
 -   : KviTalListWidgetText(lb,d-szName)
 +   KviEngineListBoxItem::KviEngineListBoxItem(KviTalListWidget *
 pList, KviCryptEngineDescription * pDesc, const char * pcModName)
 +   : KviTalListWidgetText(pList,pDesc-m_szName)
 
 which is somewhat more than a formatting change, and makes the diff rather
 noisy and difficult to review.  I appreciate that simply updating to
 upstream's new stable release makes things much easier for you but in this
 case I really would prefer a targetted update containing just the changes
 related to the issues that you believe should be fixed in stable.

  We assume that you agree or at least you will consider translation changes.

  Our plan is to work out a new diff that excludes these changes, we'll let you 
know
as soon as we have it ready for review. It's probably expected before next week.

  Please, let us know if you have any comment on this.

 
 Regards,
 
 Adam
 

  Regards,

-- 
Raúl


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110331131349.GD2523@trismegisto.universo



Re: Bug#502459: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-1

2008-10-30 Thread Raúl Sánchez Siles
  Hello Mark:

  Thanks for caring about this.

El Miércoles 29 Octubre 2008, Mark Purcell escribió:
 On Monday 27 October 2008 09:17:22 Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers wrote:
  kdelibs (4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
     +++ Changes by Ana Beatriz Guerrero Lopez:

 [...]

     +++ Changes by Raúl Sánchez Siles:
  * konqueror: Crash on eBay page (Closes: #502459) with recently added
 
   63_fixed-layout-table.diff

 Ana, Raúl et al,

 While the RC bug (#502459) has been fixed in sid via the upload of kdelibs
 4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-1, this still leaves open the resolution of this RC bug for
 lenny. (4:3.5.9.dfsg.1-6)

 Options for resolution in lenny:

 1.  Upload a new kdelibs 3.5.9, say -7, with 63_fixed-layout-table.diff
 targeted at testing-proposed-updates, or

 2.  Convince debian-release that lenny should be released with kdelibs
 3.5.10 - currently in experimental.

 I suspect that option 1 maybe more successful.

 Mark

  As we all KDE users know, kdelibs plays a major role in the stability and 
usability of whole KDE3, the one to be released on Lenny. It is true that 
changing the released version from current Lenny's apparent 3.5.9 to sid's 
3.5.10 may startle anyone, but there isn't that striking change.

  Lenny's kdelibs version includes a branch pull which makes it almost 3.5.10, 
except some minor details as, e.g.: version number. This was included before 
the freeze. You can check out that in the move some big patches had been 
removed by the fact of providing 3.5.10.

I've done some work in order to show the differences between the lenny and 
sid versions. I took both sources, applied patches and analysed differences. 
The whole diffstat is attached as 9-10.diffstat where you can see all the 
file changes done. As you can see there changes haven't been very impressive. 
But after that, I refined the information, I used this command:

ff -rNup kdelibs-3.5.9.dfsg.1/ kdelibs-3.5.10.dfsg.1/ |
filterdiff -p1 -x '*debian*' |filterdiff -x '*.desktop' |
filterdiff -x *Makefile.in |filterdiff -p1 -x kdeui/kdepackages.h 
9-10.diff

  So I took out debian dir changes, desktop file changes, autotools generated 
Makefile.in and kdepackages.h file which is a file used as a helper to bug 
tracking, where versions and applications are defined. The result off all of 
this is easily readable and is attached as 9-10.diff.

  The changelog between sid and Lenny versions is also attached as 
9-10.changelog.  As well as the modifications implied when providing real 
3.5.10 and not 3.5.10 pretending to be 3.5.9, there are 3 groups of changes 
we may break down:

  · Major: 
#502459 fix
62_fix_googlemaps_backport.diff, IMHO as serious the previous one.

  · Relevant:
libcups build-deps update
cups init script name fix, which prevented restarting cups from KDE
buildprep fix which prevented double-compilation works (release goal).

  · Minor.
The rest. Altough some of them quite interesting to have.

  In summary, I think not only #502459 should be provided in Lenny but also 
the rest of changes should be studied/included.

  Feel free to answer whatever doubt you may have about this issue. Comments 
are also welcome.

  Regards,

-- 
 Raúl Sánchez Siles
-Proud Debian user-
Linux registered user #416098
 README 
 |2 
 admin/cvs.sh   
 |2 
 configure  
 |2 
 configure.in   
 |2 
 dcop/dcopidl/Makefile.in   
 |2 
 dcop/dcopidl2cpp/Makefile.in   
 |2 
 debian/changelog   
 |   33 
 debian/control 
 |6 
 debian/control.in  
 |4 
 debian/control.tmp 
 |6 
 debian/patches/01_kdelibs_branch_r828883.diff  
 |19934 --
 debian/patches/01_kdelibs_branch_r828883.diff.log  
 |  492 
 debian/patches/02_kate_regression_r777286.diff 
 |   14 
 debian/patches/02_kate_regression_r777286.diff.level-1.log 
 |1 
 debian/patches/03_start_kdeinit_integer_overflow.diff  
 |  117 
 debian/patches/03_start_kdeinit_integer_overflow.diff.level-1.log  
 |1 
 debian/patches/05_kate_debianchangelog_default_context_r799980.diff
 |  106 
 
debian/patches/05_kate_debianchangelog_default_context_r799980.diff.level-1.log 
|2 
 debian/patches/06_khtml_rendering_r786289.diff