Bug#664793: pu: package libcap2/1:2.19-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, the security team proposed to fix CVE-2011-4099 through p-u. I've prepared a fixed package at http://people.debian.org/~twerner/ based on a backport of the fix from unstable/testing. You can find additional information about the problem at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-4099. Please consider updating the squeeze version. Cheers, Torsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#645881: critical update 29 available
Hi Philipp, Am 19.10.2011 16:33, schrieb Philipp Kern: Or it's the removal of the package. we should remove sun-java5 from oldstable, too, if we are going to remove sun-java6 from (old)stable. But I do not have a strong opinion on that. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e9ef8bc.9080...@debian.org
Re: Future of sun-java6 package ?
Hi Sylvestru, On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote: Dalibor Topic just replied through his blog to one of my question about the update 27 of sun-java6 being available under the dlj license: http://robilad.livejournal.com/90792.html thanks for the pointer. rm of sun-java6 a target for wheezy if any security alerts come ? I think we should remove it from unstable soon. It is a good question on how to proceed with (old-)stable in case of security issues. We have kept sun-java5 for oldstable and maybe we can keep sun-java6 for both stable and oldstable. I've Cc-ed the release managers. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/calj2o_2ti6zs+gs3vo77avc6t9a6k9i1aa+lbyc0njtx1d3...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#629953: pu: package sun-java6/6.26-0squeeze1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, Oracle has updated the security baseline to 6.26 and that means we should update the package in stable and oldstable. They plan to do such updates every 3 or 4 months from now on. I've prepared an updated package at http://people.debian.org/~twerner/java/ based on Sylvestre's work for unstable. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110609202752.ga3...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#629989: opu: package sun-java6/6-26-0lenny1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: opu Hi, Oracle has updated the security baseline to 6.26 and that means we should update the package in stable and oldstable. They plan to do such updates every 3 or 4 months from now on. I've prepared an updated package at http://people.debian.org/~twerner/java/ based on Sylvestre's work for unstable. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110610045010.ga23...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#613723: pu: package sun-java6/6.22-1
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: Reports of real-world tests on stable systems (successful or otherwise) would be appreciated. I am running jvisualvm before uploading to detect any stupid mistakes. But I would be nice to have some nx server or something similar for (old)stable. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=qrfsvi3mjjk9vgkedeabcsnwlulacugzaj...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#613723: pu: package sun-java6/6.22-1
Hi, Am 17.02.2011 16:21, schrieb Julien Cristau: Do we have any idea what the new upstream releases include besides the security related stuff? Your diff doesn't say that. from the release notes: - OlsonData 2010o - Java DB 10.6.2.1 - other bug fixes: java_plugin - pogo games crashes AOL browser with 6u23 - Improved performance and stability / Java Hotspot VM 19.0 - Enhanced support for right-to-left languages / several bug fixes - Java VisualVM 1.3.1 - Additional Languages Support in Linux Systems - other bugfixes listed at http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/2col/6u23bugfixes-191074.html Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d5d4445.1050...@debian.org
Bug#613723: pu: package sun-java6/6.22-1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
the version 6.24-1 of the package contains important security related bugfixes.
I would take 6.24-1 from unstable and build a version 6.24-1~squeeze1 for
stable. All the changes in the unstable package are safe for stable. I am
attaching a source package diff between 6.22-1 ... 6.24-1.
Cheers,
Torsten
Index: debian/control
===
--- debian/control (Revision 13028)
+++ debian/control (Revision 13328)
@@ -4,11 +4,11 @@
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Uploaders: Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org, Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0.51~), lsb-release, po-debconf, defoma, unzip, bzip2, patch, libasound2, unixodbc, libx11-6, libxext6, libxi6, libxp6, libxt6, libxtst6, lib32asound2 [amd64], ia32-libs [amd64 ia64]
-Standards-Version: 3.8.4
+Standards-Version: 3.9.1
Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/sun-java6
Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-java/trunk/sun-java6
XS-Autobuild: yes
-Homepage: https://jdk-distros.dev.java.net
+Homepage: http://jdk-distros.java.net/
Package: sun-java6-jre
Section: non-free/java
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
Architecture: amd64 i386 lpia
Section: non-free/web
Priority: optional
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, sun-java6-bin (= ${source:Version}), firefox | firefox-2 | iceweasel | mozilla-firefox | iceape-browser | mozilla-browser | epiphany-gecko | epiphany-webkit | epiphany-browser | galeon | midbrowser | moblin-web-browser | xulrunner | xulrunner-1.9 | konqueror | chromium-browser | midori
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, sun-java6-bin (= ${source:Version}), firefox | firefox-2 | iceweasel | mozilla-firefox | iceape-browser | mozilla-browser | epiphany-gecko | epiphany-webkit | epiphany-browser | galeon | midbrowser | moblin-web-browser | xulrunner | xulrunner-1.9 | konqueror | chromium-browser | midori | google-chrome
Xb-Npp-Applications: ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384, 92650c4d-4b8e-4d2a-b7eb-24ecf4f6b63a
Xb-Npp-Name: The Java(TM) Plug-in, Java SE 6
Xb-Npp-MimeType: application/x-java-vm, application/x-java-applet, application/x-java-applet;version=1.1, application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.1, application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.2, application/x-java-applet;version=1.1.3, application/x-java-applet;version=1.2, application/x-java-applet;version=1.2.1, application/x-java-applet;version=1.2.2, application/x-java-applet;version=1.3, application/x-java-applet;version=1.3.1, application/x-java-applet;version=1.4, application/x-java-applet;version=1.4.1, application/x-java-applet;version=1.4.2, application/x-java-applet;version=1.5, application/x-java-applet;version=1.6, application/x-java-applet;jpi-version=1.6.0_07, application/x-java-bean, application/x-java-bean;version=1.1, application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.1, application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.2, application/x-java-bean;version=1.1.3, application/x-java-bean;version=1.2, application/x-java-bean;version=1.2.1, application/x-java-bean;version=1.2.2, application/x-java-bean;version=1.3, application/x-java-bean;version=1.3.1, application/x-java-bean;version=1.4, application/x-java-bean;version=1.4.1, application/x-java-bean;version=1.4.2, application/x-java-bean;version=1.5, application/x-java-bean;version=1.6, application/x-java-bean;jpi-version=1.6.0_07
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
Architecture: amd64 ia64
Section: non-free/web
Priority: optional
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ia32-sun-java6-bin (= ${source:Version}), firefox | firefox-2 | iceweasel | mozilla-firefox | iceape-browser | mozilla-browser | epiphany-gecko | epiphany-webkit | epiphany-browser | galeon | midbrowser | moblin-web-browser | xulrunner | xulrunner-1.9 | konqueror | chromium-browser | midori
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ia32-sun-java6-bin (= ${source:Version}), firefox | firefox-2 | iceweasel | mozilla-firefox | iceape-browser | mozilla-browser | epiphany-gecko | epiphany-webkit | epiphany-browser | galeon | midbrowser | moblin-web-browser | xulrunner | xulrunner-1.9 | konqueror | chromium-browser | midori | google-chrome
Description: The Java(TM) Plug-in, Java SE 6 (32-bit)
Java Plug-in enables applets written to the Java Platform 6
specification to be run in Mozilla and other web browsers.
Index: debian/control.in
===
--- debian/control.in (Revision 13028)
+++ debian/control.in (Revision 13328)
@@ -4,11 +4,11 @@
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Uploaders: Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org, Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0.51~), lsb-release, po-debconf, defoma, unzip, bzip2, patch, libasound2, unixodbc, libx11-6, libxext6, libxi6, libxp6, libxt6, libxtst6
Bug#613741: opu: package sun-java6/6-24-0lenny1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: opu Hi, please have a look at http://people.debian.org/~twerner/ for an (security) update of sun-java6 in oldstable. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110216224151.ga19...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#611117: unblock: apt/0.8.10.3
Hi, Am 29.01.2011 23:38, schrieb David Kalnischkies: Given that the feature was implemented on request for ftpmaster [0] I at least hope they (still) use apt-ftparchive (at least for this)… (and a quick grep over dak shows a few 'a-f generate' calls, but yeah, thats guessing, as the feature implementation was guesswork, but thats a different story… no answer is an answer…) yes, we are still using apt-ftparchive to generate the Packages, Sources and Contents files. Contents is still a major pita. Packages and Sources are okay since we have 16 CPU cores to run the code in parallel. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d4529f7.10...@debian.org
Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny
Hi Florian, On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote: I suppose we need to disable building the plugin on lenny (it's in a separate package there anyway, I think). Is there an easy way to do this? I think there is some code in debian/rules: ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH), alpha hppa sparc64)$(filter $(distrel), dapper)) with_plugin_pkg = no else with_plugin_pkg = yes endif Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTinX4wXJbSvLMcN8zNu5NuZp=oxde0ijomzqb...@mail.gmail.com
Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny
Hi, On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: How does that follow? These kinds of updates are sort of allowed for sun-java6 because it's non-free so there's no choice. That does not apply to openjdk, as far as I know. I think that openjdk is not that different. Oracle does not release small patches. They release several non-free binary tarballs (sun-java6) and a GPL-2 source tarball (openjdk). It is almost impossible to extract individual fixes from the source tarball. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinhnjw-my+iwdgiozdxuksmv4-vdu066cxu5...@mail.gmail.com
Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote: * Florian Weimer: AFAICT, Debian is actually shipping IcedTea releases, but those are re-rebranded as IcedTea. Sorry, re-rebranded as OpenJDK. Oracle occasionally releases source tarballs at http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk6/promoted/. The icedtea project adds some patches, a build system, and some smaller components like the browser plugin. All distributions use icedtea to build their binary packages. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=yQTqBWru0x6t3cTAYSWf51wxuexh-_3=qa...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#602593: pu: package sun-java6/6-22-0lenny1
Hi Adam, On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 11:19 +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: a new version of sun-java6 for stable is available at http://people.debian.org/~twerner/. There only seems to be a source package there. Have the binaries been built and tested? thanks for the reminder. The (tested) binary packages are now available from the same place. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinewaqzogfls-jjge+56kwhw5iwogxtzbmbf...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#602593: pu: package sun-java6/6-22-0lenny1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, a new version of sun-java6 for stable is available at http://people.debian.org/~twerner/. It fixes multiple security issues. We cannot patch the old upstream version because we have no source code for the non free package. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101106101912.20804.18070.report...@twerner
Bug#592421: unblock: groovy/1.7.4-1
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 20:52 +0200, Torsten Werner wrote: No. Do you want me to upload a version that fixes #580160 to testing? Yes, please (sorry for the delay :-/) I've uploaded version 1.7.0-4 to testing. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=h591eb9i7ciqa=t7izh4wdsrse-or+1fm2...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#592421: unblock: groovy/1.7.4-1
Hi Adam, On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: 317 files changed, 12971 insertions(+), 4237 deletions(-) which is saner but was still a pain to review. yes I agree. The changelog suggests that the fix for that bug was simply the addition of default-jdk to the dependencies. Is there something else which is specifically reliant on the new upstream version? (Other than not wanting to maintain an older version). No. Do you want me to upload a version that fixes #580160 to testing? Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktiÍmrspeb6ublsjnanlzhqbqzbjrya=s5u4...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#592697: unblock: java-common/0.40
reopen 592697 thanks Hi, thanks for unblocking 0.39 but my upload did not work as expected because the arch any packages got downgraded on mips. I have introduced an epoch for the arch any packages now. The upload includes the switch to openjdk on powerpcsce as discussed at http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/08/msg01138.html. The source diff can be seen at http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-java/?op=compcompare[]=%2ftrunk%2fjava-com...@12897compare[]=%2ftrunk%2fjava-com...@12931. Thanks, Torsten unblock java-common/0.40 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktim3s2guyrjfm8wrjnj3ko=7g8gvucwf4x8h3...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#593277: unblock: libhibernate3-java/3.5.2.Final-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libhibernate3-java It fixes the RC bug #593254 (conflict with hibernate-entititymanager). The diff can be seen at http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/libhibernate3-java.git;a=commitdiff;h=c772628999c6272b1e72d2e45e8f9366bcf11ef9. Thanks, Torsten unblock libhibernate3-java/3.5.2.Final-3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100816212702.ga18...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#593280: unblock: libcap2/1:2.19-3
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libcap2 The upload fixes the RC bug #593250 (needs versioned dependency on libpam-runtime). The diff can be seen at http://code.google.com/p/bollin/source/detail?r=4679. Thanks, Torsten unblock libcap2/1:2.19-3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100816215006.ga24...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny
Hi, On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote: * Philipp Kern: On 08/08/2010 11:21 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: Cool, it's based on OpenJDK 6b18. However, we can't upload it as-is because the version number is greater than the one in testing. apart from the fact that this could of course be solved by an upload to t-p-u in the worst case, it's the case that packages from proposed-updates that are newer than testing at point release time are then copied into testing. In this case, we don't want this behavior because the version currently in testing offers more features than the version which is about to be uploaded. the transition of the unstable package to testing should happen soon. I've filed #591998 and RM requests for all reverse (Build-)Depends. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin-gcq4mtamyitbyda4-lx+qbgsjx43gd28y...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#592421: unblock: groovy/1.7.4-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock the packages groovy, libjansi-java, libjansi-native-java, and libhawtjni-runtime-java The latest upstream minor release of groovy introduced 3 new Build-Depends: libjansi-java, libjansi-native-java, and libhawtjni-runtime-java that have been accepted into unstable recently. We failed to upload them right before the freeze but I think all 4 packages should be unblocked because: - they fix the RC bug #580160 and - for the long term maintainance of groovy in Squeeze it would make sense to have the current upstream release in testing. unblock groovy/1.7.4-1 unblock libjansi-java/1.4-1 unblock libjansi-native-java/1.0-1 unblock libhawtjni-runtime-java/1.0~+git0c502e20c4-1 Thanks, Torsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#592279: unblock: geronimo-validation-1.0-spec/1.1-2, geronimo-jacc-1.1-spec/1.0.1-1.1, and geronimo-jpa-2.0-spec/1.1-2
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock the packages geronimo-validation-1.0-spec, geronimo-jacc-1.1-spec, and geronimo-jpa-2.0-spec. The uploads just add the missing pom.xml files needed by reverse Build-Depends that use Maven for packaging like libhibernate3-java and is non-intrusive for other packages. The change has been tested for a while by the pkg-java team but we forgot to upload 3 packages before the freeze (or in case of the geronimo-jacc-*-spec a NMU was needed). Since libhibernate3-java already has a freeze exception it makes sense to unblock its reverse B-D to fix its build failures. Thanks, Torsten unblock geronimo-validation-1.0-spec/1.1-2 unblock geronimo-jacc-1.1-spec/1.0.1-1.1 unblock geronimo-jpa-2.0-spec/1.1-2 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: OpenJDK / default JDK for squeeze / issues on mips / open security issues for lenny
Hi, On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Tom Marble tmar...@info9.net wrote: On 07/28/2010 06:44 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: OpenJDK was just uploaded to unstable, based on the IcedTea6-1.8.1 release [1]. This version addresses some security issues, and this version should be shipped with squeeze A group of Debian Java developers met tonight and agreed that we would not advocate OpenJDK changes for squeeze. to avoid any misunderstandings: we want OpenJDK 6b18-1.8.1-1 in Squeeze (currently in unstable and unblocked). The steps that needs to be done: 1. File a partial removal request for mips. I'll do it. 2. Change default-jdk to point to gcj on mips. I can do that. 3. File an unblock request for java-common. (for me, too) Is the release team okay with that? Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktincmr4nsbxthtcdopi8no8yt8ou90qpqtseo...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#590312: RM: sun-java6/stable [ia64] -- ROM; arch ia64 cannot execute i386 binaries
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, I am filing 3 removal requests for - sun-java6/unstable [ia64] - sun-java6/stable [ia64] - sun-java5/stable [ia64] because the ia64 architecture on Debian cannot execute i386 binaries currently. Please check bug #563402 for more information. The package in unstable cannot transition to testing because of that issue and we have (ia64) packages with security issues in stable. Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100725202205.ga3...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#590313: RM: sun-java5/stable [ia64] -- ROM; arch ia64 cannot execute i386 binaries
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, I am filing 3 removal requests for - sun-java6/unstable [ia64] - sun-java6/stable [ia64] - sun-java5/stable [ia64] because the ia64 architecture on Debian cannot execute i386 binaries currently. Please check bug #563402 for more information. The package in unstable cannot transition to testing because of that issue and we have (ia64) packages with security issues in stable. Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100725202337.ga3...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#579681: pu: package sun-java5/1.5.0-22-0lenny1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, the non-free Sun JDKs often have security issues and can only be updated through new upstream versions since we do not have source code. 1.5.0-22 will be the last upstream update because this version has been declared EOL (end of life). The security team asked me to update the package through pu. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100429191455.ga2...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#579682: pu: package sun-java6/6-20-0lenny1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, the non-free Sun JDKs often have security issues and can only be updated through new upstream versions since we do not have source code. The security team asked me to update the package through pu. The new package is available at http://people.debian.org/~twerner/ and the debdiff at http://people.debian.org/~twerner/sun-java6.debdiff. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100429191751.ga2...@lumpi.twerner42.de
Bug#579681: pu: package sun-java5/1.5.0-22-0lenny1
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org wrote: the non-free Sun JDKs often have security issues and can only be updated through new upstream versions since we do not have source code. I forgot to mention that the new package is available at http://people.debian.org/~twerner/ and the debdiff at http://people.debian.org/~twerner/sun-java5.debdiff. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/r2pa90bfcf1004291221t29fdef0buf7feba80cc36d...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Making auto decruft easier for us and the release team
Joerg Jaspert schrieb: And if one made sure no-action actually follows its name. :) I am not aware of any problems in 'dak rm --no-action'. What's wrong with it? Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bd175fb.1050...@debian.org
Re: Making auto decruft easier for us and the release team
Hi, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl schrieb: The problems arise, when there are still some packages (build-)depending on the binary packages to be removed. I guess the correct thing for broken build-depends is to fill RC bugs against the affected packages, as they are (defacto) FTBFS. I've given up on filing bug reports because they got closed without fixing the problem. So, I'm open for ideas how to improve the workflow and making it easier for the release team and us (especially for me ;) We could add an option --verbose to cruft-report that actually runs the suggested commands with the --no-action option added (but only if the command is actually doing an rdep check). Everyone could see the details at http://ftp-master.debian.org/cruft-report-daily.txt as soon as we enable --verbose for the dinstall run. The release team may schedule binNMUs as needed. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bd06328.2030...@debian.org
Re: No migration of vzquota
Hi, Ola Lundqvist schrieb: I assume I file a bug against ftp.debian.org, right? yes: reportbug ftp.debian.org | ANAIS Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bcc24bb.1010...@debian.org
retitle 559789 to RM: libgnucrypto-java -- RoM; security issue, no rdeps, low popcon ...
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 retitle 559789 RM: libgnucrypto-java -- RoM; security issue, no rdeps, low popcon reassign 559789 ftp.debian.org retitle 566503 RM: libgnucrypto-java/stable -- RoM; security issue, no rdeps, low popcon # me and my mail client suck reassign 566503 release.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: quantlib 0.9.9 is nine days old but has not been built on any arch
Dirk Eddelbuettel schrieb: Maybe not. See r-cran-rquantlib still depends on QL 0.9.7. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: quantlib 0.9.9 is nine days old but has not been built on any arch
Adam D. Barratt schrieb: ftp-team: Please decruft libquantlib-0.9.9. # Broken Depends: quantlib-swig: quantlib-python [amd64 hurd-i386] quantlib-ruby [amd64] rquantlib: r-cran-rquantlib BinNMUs should be scheduled. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: any idea why xz-utils 4.999.9beta+20091016-1 and shogun 0.9.1-1 are not yet in unstable?
Hi, Luk Claes schrieb: The semi-automatic cruft removal seems to not have happened yet. yes, cruft-report is still broken due to the new arch: all handling. I am working on it. I'll remove liblzma0 and libshogun5 that after the next dinstall run. Let me know if you are aware of other cruft in unstable or experimental. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: any idea why xz-utils 4.999.9beta+20091016-1 and shogun 0.9.1-1 are not yet in unstable?
Hi Luk, Luk Claes schrieb: libming0, libprotobuf4 and libprotoc4, python-nautilusburn done, but the following packages need binNMUs: salasaga [alpha amd64 armel hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc] protobuf-c [mips] Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Recommendations regarding removal of emacs22
Hi Rob, Rob Browning schrieb: I'd like to consider the possiblity of removing emacs22 from Debian (unstable/testing), and so I thought I'd contact you first to see if this is likely to be feasible before we freeze next year. I have Cc-ed the release team. If so, how would you prefer I handle the process? Note that there are many rdepends, and I was planning to contact those maintainers next. Yes, please talk to the maintainers and file bug reports against their packages. You can file the removal request against ftp.debian.org as soon as all reverse (build) depends have been fixed or removed. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
calibre -- please remove from testing, long-standing RC bugs (was: Bug#547288: RM: calibre -- ROM; currently unmaintainable in Debian)
tags 547288 + wontfix thanks Hi Martin, Martin Pitt schrieb: After the recent discussion with Miriam I change my request to only remove calibre from testing, so that it won't go into stables until/unless the RC bugs get sorted out. the FTP team does not remove packages from testing because of RC bugs. That is the job of the release team (on Cc now). Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug #544478 ftp.debian.org: diff should not be extra in testing yet
Hi RMs, regarding this bug report: would it be an option to lower age-days for diffutils a bit? Cheers, Torsten attachment: email.vcf
Re: transition plan from libcap to libcap2
Hi Adeodato, On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es wrote: - vsftpd needs a binNMU scheduled on armel I have no idea why +b1 got rebuilt against libcap1, because libcap2 clearly got installed in the chroot. Anyway, built +b2 now successfully. - pulseaudio FTBFS on hppa and a bug report has already been filed: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520378 Feel free to NMU. ;-) the transition is done now. The old libcap source package has been removed from testing today. Thanks for your help, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: transition plan from libcap to libcap2
Hi Adeodato, there are still some issues regarding the libcap2 transition in unstable: - zorp needs binNMUs scheduled on all arches except armel because it has been built with an old version of libzorp* - vsftpd needs a binNMU scheduled on armel - quagga fails to build on sparc that looks like a buildd failure (sp...@buildd on Cc): https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=quaggaarch=sparcver=0.99.11-1%2Bb1stamp=1238271735file=logas=raw - pulseaudio FTBFS on hppa and a bug report has already been filed: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520378 Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: transition plan from libcap to libcap2
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es wrote: Thoughts? At any rate, whenever a libcap-dev 2.16-3 or higher hits unstable, please let us know and we’ll schedule the required Bin-NMUs. I have uploaded a new version of libcap2. Please binNMU: libzorpll 3.0.6.4.2+nmu1 muddleftpd 1.3.13.1-4.2 quagga 0.99.11-1 zorp 3.0.8-0.5 autodir 0.99.9-2 Would you be up to the task of tracking their results, and file bugs as appropriate (with some usertag, etc.)? I'll check the build logs. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: transition plan from libcap to libcap2
Hi Adeodato, On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es wrote: I would recommend in that case that the libcap2-dev package gets completely dropped (and not even kept as eg. a transitional package), provided that you make the new libcap-dev Provide: libcap2-dev, in order not to cause unnecessary FTBFSes. we have more packages that Build-Depends: libcap2-dev than packages that Build-Depends: libcap-dev now. Would your plan to completely drop libcap2-dev still work? If that is not a problem I am okay with dropping the package. Would you be up to the task of tracking their results, and file bugs as appropriate (with some usertag, etc.)? Sure. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
transition plan from libcap to libcap2
Hi, libcap is no longer maintained upstream and has been replaced by libcap2 which is supposed to be API compatible. There are some packages left that Build-Depend on libcap: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=libcap2;users=twer...@debian.org. My plan is to add a transitional binary package libcap-dev to the source package libcap2 until squeeze will be released and remove the source package libcap from unstable. After some binNMUs everything will be okay. The maintainer of libcap (Michael Vogt) agrees to the plan. Are there any problems with the proposed transition plan from the release managers point of view? Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
please unblock ejabberd
Hi, it fixes the Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507615 or the same upstream bug https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-817. Upgrades from Etch might break without the new patch we've got from the upstream developers. Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
please unblock mnogosearch
Hi, version 3.3.7-3 fixes the RC bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512569. The patch can be found in the bug report. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug #506977 FPC: copyright infringement in pre 2.2.2 sources
Hi, my suggestion is to remove fpc from oldstable and stable but unblock the unstable version 2.2.2-4 for lenny and trigger binNMUs for lazarus. What do you think? What is the correct way to remove packages from (old)stable? Should I file a bug report against ftp.debian.org or is it done by the SRM? Cheers, Torsten On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Marco van de Voort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Note: I'm the FPC core developer that also features in the Ubuntu correspondance. Carlos (the maintainer of this port) can confirm that, or have a look here: http://www.freepascal.org/aboutus.var The probable infringement was brought to our attention in early 2007. The infringement was made amenable mostly due to trivial means (variable names, fairly small procedures that were the same). The other side was really cooperative, and gave us time to clean up massively, without having to immediately pull all sources, and we employed at tool to identify potential problem sources, and found a lot more. So we cut real wide, and reengineered all potentially infringing code. (all in all a nontrivial amount). However because the infringement was so trivial, and relicensing counterproductive and confusion, it was decided to pull all releases. So in august, after 2.2.2 came out, we removed all older releases from our site, and assumed the mentioning of the copyright problems in our release manifest would be enough to warrant a swift upgrade. I hope it need no explanation that that was a pretty painful step, removing 10 years of history of our project. However, here we are now, 3-4 months after the release and the heads up, and the infringing code is still served from Debian servers. We are not happy with this. Note that it is also not fair to the other party who has been patient, and now could see the code still floating around. In short: please remove the old versions as soon as possible, or upgrade. Marco. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#475737: remove otrs2 from lenny?
Hi Thomas, On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: given that there seems to be limited interest in fixing the #475737 (3 weeks since reopen without further comments), how about removing otrs2 from lenny? I had sent the following reply to the list (but not to the bug) weeks ago but I did not get an answer so far: I agree that it is a FHS violation that will be fixed in unstable and that we have lived with the problem in sarge and etch but I do not agree that it is a security problem. That is why I ask for an exception for lenny. Let me quote from the bug report: ... every web application has read access to /etc/otrs/database.pm which means it can create havoc in the database, install stored procedures and so on. Every other webapp with a database has the same problem - not only otrs. It is the duty of the local admin to make sure that the installation is safe. I do not understand what is so special about otrs... It is not hard to modify foreign databases when it comes to webapps that are executed by the same httpd user and BTW stored procedures are executed in the context of the postgres user. I am sorry that the FHS issue cannot be fixed easily but the bug report came very late before the freeze. Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libjboss-serialization-java: please allow upload to t-p-u
Hi, the attached patch will fix Bug #503798. Cheers, Torsten jboss-ser.diff Description: application/text
glassfish: please allow upload to tpu
Hi, I want to upload glassfish to testing to fix bug #503775. The patch is attached. Cheers, Torsten glassfish.diff Description: application/text
please unblock java-access-bridge
Hi, version 1.23.0-3 fixes a RC bug only. Cheers, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please remove otrs2/2.2.7-2lenny1
Hi, On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It includes severe FHS violations and produces security problems with this, see #475737 for reference. I agree that it is a FHS violation that will be fixed in unstable and that we have lived with the problem in sarge and etch but I do not agree that it is a security problem. That is why I ask for an exception for lenny. Let me quote from the bug report: ... every web application has read access to /etc/otrs/database.pm which means it can create havoc in the database, install stored procedures and so on. Every other webapp with a database has the same problem - not only otrs. It is the duty of the local admin to make sure that the installation is safe. I do not understand what is so special about otrs... It is not hard to modify foreign databases when it comes to webapps that are executed by the same httpd user and BTW stored procedures are executed in the context of the postgres user. I am sorry that the FHS issue cannot be fixed easily but the bug report came very late before the freeze. Cheers, Torsten -- http://twerner.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fixing #494683
Hi On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We normally don't give t-p-u tickets without seeing a diff first. Though I guess you'll just add libapache2-reload-perl to the Recommends? (In tha case uploading is ok.) that would not help because libapache2-reload-perl is already recommended through libapache2-mod-perl2. The actual patch is attached now. Is it okay to upload? Cheers, Torsten -- http://twerner.blogspot.com Index: debian/changelog === --- debian/changelog (Revision 370) +++ debian/changelog (Revision 371) @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +otrs2 (2.2.7-2lenny1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low + + * Do not load the module Apache2::Reload if it is not installed. +(Closes: #494683) + + -- Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 23 Oct 2008 06:36:29 +0200 + otrs2 (2.2.7-2) unstable; urgency=high * Disable the patch permissions.diff again because OTRS can't work with such Index: debian/patches/apache.diff === --- debian/patches/apache.diff (Revision 370) +++ debian/patches/apache.diff (Revision 371) @@ -1,8 +1,23 @@ -Index: otrs2-2.2.0~beta2/scripts/apache2-httpd-new.include.conf +Index: otrs2-2.2.7/scripts/apache2-httpd-new.include.conf === otrs2-2.2.0~beta2.orig/scripts/apache2-httpd-new.include.conf 2007-04-17 00:16:07.0 +0200 -+++ otrs2-2.2.0~beta2/scripts/apache2-httpd-new.include.conf 2007-04-17 00:18:28.0 +0200 -@@ -25,11 +25,16 @@ +--- otrs2-2.2.7.orig/scripts/apache2-httpd-new.include.conf 2008-10-23 06:22:35.0 +0200 otrs2-2.2.7/scripts/apache2-httpd-new.include.conf 2008-10-23 06:30:33.0 +0200 +@@ -13,9 +13,11 @@ + # load all otrs modules + Perlrequire /usr/share/otrs/scripts/apache2-perl-startup.pl + +-# Apache::Reload - Reload Perl Modules when Changed on Disk +-PerlModule Apache2::Reload +-PerlInitHandler Apache2::Reload ++IfModule Apache2/Reload.pm ++ # Apache::Reload - Reload Perl Modules when Changed on Disk ++ PerlModule Apache2::Reload ++ PerlInitHandler Apache2::Reload ++/IfModule + PerlModule Apache2::RequestRec + + # set mod_perl2 options +@@ -25,11 +27,16 @@ ErrorDocument 404 /otrs/index.pl SetHandler perl-script PerlResponseHandler ModPerl::Registry
fixing #494683
Hi, I want to fix the bug through t-p-u. May I upload the package? Cheers, Torsten -- http://twerner.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please unblock enigmail
Hi, version 0.95.0+1-3.2 fixes an old RC bug. The diff is available at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=enigmail-0.95.0%2B1-3.2-nmu.diff;att=1;bug=501973. Cheers, Torsten -- http://twerner.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please unblock jwchat
Hi, please unblock version 1.0beta3-3 that has only documentation and translation updates. The debdiff output is attached. Thanks, Torsten -- http://twerner.blogspot.com diff -u jwchat-1.0beta3/debian/changelog jwchat-1.0beta3/debian/changelog --- jwchat-1.0beta3/debian/changelog +++ jwchat-1.0beta3/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +jwchat (1.0beta3-3) unstable; urgency=low + + * Clean up README.Debian. (Closes: #481320) + * Add brazilian debconf messages translation. (Closes: #481522) + * Add swedish debconf messages translation. (Closes: #494887) + * Add italian debconf messages translation. (Closes: #495780) + * Add russian debconf messages translation. (Closes: #495573) + * Add finnish debconf messages translation. (Closes: #496227) + + -- Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 24 Aug 2008 15:02:53 +0200 + jwchat (1.0beta3-2) unstable; urgency=low * Switch to debhelper 5. diff -u jwchat-1.0beta3/debian/README.Debian jwchat-1.0beta3/debian/README.Debian --- jwchat-1.0beta3/debian/README.Debian +++ jwchat-1.0beta3/debian/README.Debian @@ -14,13 +14,7 @@ * /etc/jwchat/config.js * /etc/apache2/sites-available/jwchat -which can be changed as needed. The following bugs have been reported to the -upstream developer: - - * http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1516458group_id=92011atid=599212 - * http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1523372group_id=92011atid=599212 - * http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1523422group_id=92011atid=599212 - +which can be changed as needed. Torsten Werner only in patch2: unchanged: --- jwchat-1.0beta3.orig/debian/po/pt_BR.po +++ jwchat-1.0beta3/debian/po/pt_BR.po @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +# jwchat Brazilian Portuguese translation +# Copyright (C) 2008 THE jwchat'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER +# This file is distributed under the same license as the jwchat package. +# Marcelo Jorge Vieira (metal) [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008. +# +msgid +msgstr pt_BR utf-8\n +Project-Id-Version: jwchat_1.0beta3-2\n +Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n +POT-Creation-Date: 2008-03-17 04:39+0100\n +PO-Revision-Date: 2008-05-02 11:54-0300\n +Last-Translator: Marcelo Jorge Vieira (metal) [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n +Language-Team: l10n portuguese [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n +MIME-Version: 1.0\n +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n + +#. Type: string +#. Description +#: ../templates:1001 +msgid The name of the virtual server used for apache2: +msgstr O nome do servidor virtual usado para o apache2: + +#. Type: string +#. Description +#: ../templates:1001 +msgid +The automatic apache2 configuration needs a name for a virtual server that +is used exclusively by jwchat. If you do not want any automatic +configuration, please answer 'none' here (without quotes). +msgstr +A configuração automática do apache2 precisa de um nome para um servidor +virtual que é usado exclusivamente pelo jwchat. Se você não quer qualquer +configuração automática, por favor, responda 'none' aqui (sem aspas). + +#. Type: string +#. Description +#: ../templates:2001 +msgid The URL of your jabber server: +msgstr A URL do seu servidor jabber: + +#. Type: string +#. Description +#: ../templates:2001 +msgid +Please enter the address where your jabber server can be reached. Usually +you can leave the default value unchanged if you have installed ejabberd +locally. +msgstr +Por favor, informe o endereço em que o seu servidor jabber pode ser alcançado. + Geralmente você pode deixar o valor padrão inalterado se você já instalou o +ejabberd localmente. only in patch2: unchanged: --- jwchat-1.0beta3.orig/debian/po/ru.po +++ jwchat-1.0beta3/debian/po/ru.po @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +# translation of ru.po to Russian +# Copyright (C) YEAR THE PACKAGE'S COPYRIGHT HOLDER +# This file is distributed under the same license as the PACKAGE package. +# +# Yuri Kozlov [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2008. +msgid +msgstr +Project-Id-Version: ru\n +Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n +POT-Creation-Date: 2008-03-17 04:39+0100\n +PO-Revision-Date: 2008-08-18 22:12+0400\n +Last-Translator: Yuri Kozlov [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n +Language-Team: Russian [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n +MIME-Version: 1.0\n +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n +X-Generator: KBabel 1.11.4\n +Plural-Forms: nplurals=3; plural=(n%10==1 n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10=2 n%10=4 (n%10010 || n%100=20) ? 1 : 2);\n + +#. Type: string +#. Description +#: ../templates:1001 +msgid The name of the virtual server used for apache2: +msgstr ÐÐ¼Ñ Ð²Ð¸ÑÑÑалÑного ÑеÑвеÑа Ð´Ð»Ñ apache2: + +#. Type: string +#. Description +#: ../templates:1001 +msgid +The automatic apache2 configuration needs a name for a virtual server that +is used exclusively by jwchat. If you do not want any automatic +configuration, please answer 'none' here (without quotes). +msgstr +ÐÐ»Ñ Ð°Ð²ÑомаÑиÑеÑкой наÑÑÑойки apache2 ÑÑебÑеÑÑÑ Ð¸Ð¼Ñ Ð²Ð¸ÑÑÑалÑного ÑеÑвеÑÐ
Re: Bug#492311: icedtea-gcjwebplugin should be moved to main ASAP
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/icedtea-gcjwebplugin_1.0+dak1-1.html There was some delay because of a bug in dak. I do not know if the release team is willing to unblock the package. Cheers, Torsten -- http://twerner.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please unblock mnogosearch
Hi, mnogosearch 3.3.7-2 just has translation updates. The debdiff is attached. Thanks, Torsten -- http://twerner.blogspot.com debdiff Description: Binary data
Re: Bug#474632: Bug #474632: josm: Should not enter testing
Hi Andreas, On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course, it would be helpful if the old Web APIs could stay around for ~2 years - which could be done by having converters for the old vs new api. AFAIK openstreetmap supports older APIs if possible. But sometimes they change the data model in a very incompatible way to enable new features that have been missing formerly. Cheers, Torsten -- http://twerner.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug #474632: josm: Should not enter testing
Hi, On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Giovanni Mascellani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: while an out-of-date josm wouldn't work for anyone. every Flickr client, the google data api, instant messager client that talk proprietory protocols and probably more packages have the same problem but we ship them in testing and stable anyway. I still think your bug report is not valid. I have set debian-release on Cc: to get their opinion about this issue. Cheers, Torsten -- http://twerner.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please hint libfwbuilder and fwbuilder into testing
Thanks, Torsten -- http://twerner.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Suitesparse transition
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the shogun developer (Sören) is still on vacation but I will contact him ASAP. Shogun has now been built on all important architectures except hppa where the buildd is very slow. I do not know what we can do here. Cheers, Torsten -- http://twerner.blogspot.com
broken buildd (was: Suitesparse transition)
Hi, please see http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=shogunarch=armver=0.5.1-1stamp=1205965767file=logas=raw: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 May 23 2007 /etc/alternatives/octave-config - /usr/bin/octave-config-2.1.71 That is fully broken. Who can be contacted about the problem? Cheers, Torsten -- http://twerner.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Suitesparse transition
[shogun] On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But given that arm and mips(el) FTBFSed anyway... the shogun developer (Sören) is still on vacation but I will contact him ASAP. Cheers, Torsten -- http://twerner.blogspot.com
Re: Bug#464019: Please binNMU rsstail in all archs
severity 464019 important tags 464019 + wontfix thanks On Feb 10, 2008 3:54 AM, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bug #464019 should be resolved - either by changing the package name of libmrss0, or by closing the bug as a wontfix - before these packages should be binNMUed; otherwise I have no way of knowing that there won't be another binNMU request a week from now when libmrss0 *does* get renamed. I lower the severity to important because the problem can be solved by rebuilding the dependent packages and I add the tag wontfix because I will implement a better solution sometimes in future but not very soon. Cheers, Torsten -- http://twerner.blogspot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mips and mipsel buildd's dysfunctional?
On Dec 22, 2007 6:25 AM, Soeren Sonnenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've seen this problem with older shlibdeps on i386 too. Back in November I asked Raphael Hertzog on how to fix it and he said I am doing the right thing [1] and it builds on all archs except mips and mipsel now. So yes I think it is not a bug in shogun this time, but was caused by the autobuilders using a dpkg version prior to 1.14.11. I have built the package on mips without any changes but I have no chance to build it on mipsel because there is no machine. It looks like that the buildds are somehow broken on both architectures. Cheers, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please binNMU newsbeuter on all arches
Hi, new (incompatible) upstream versions of libnxml and libmrss with versioned shlibs have been uploaded. A rebuild of newsbeuter is required because of that. Thanks, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please trigger rebuilds of opencv on !m68k
Hi, it should help fixing http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=427359. Thanks, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
problem with mips
Hi, erlang has been autobuilt on mips: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=erlang;ver=1%3A11.b.4-2;arch=mips;stamp=1176246046 but the package has never reached the mirrors. What is wrong? Can it be given back to the autobuilder? Cheers, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gcc plans for the lenny cycle
On 4/15/07, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't see any reason to not upgrade them all to important as of now (and we'll probably have some release goals again, and having compiles with gcc-x.y for all (future) x.y as goal seems like a good idea to me. Just a note: the new gcc-snapshot is missing on i386 and several other architectures. Cheers, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please unblock ejabberd again
Hi, it is yet another security fix because of an unexpected behaviour of adduser. Adduser always sets the permission of the home dir to world readable. Additionally the new ejabberd package restricts the permissions of the log directory which might be wrong on existing installations. Thanks, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please unblock stlport5
On 2/17/07, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This upstream update appears to include a significant number of unrelated changes. Please isolate the security fix for an upload to t-p-u (or testing-security). I have isolated the rope patch for the testing package. Should I upload the fixed package to testing? Cheers, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please unblock stlport5
On 2/20/07, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 09:44:48PM +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: I have isolated the rope patch for the testing package. Should I upload the fixed package to testing? Yes please. done (and no regression in the test suite) Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please unblock stlport5
Hi, it fixes a security bug: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-0803 and #410864, but it is an upstream update. Thanks, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please unblock stlport5
On 2/14/07, Noah Meyerhans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this bug also present in stable? The bug report content suggests that it may be, though it's not tagged as such. http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/22423 lists stlport5.0 and stable ships stlport4.6 only. Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please unblock jwchat
Hi, the package in testing has 2 bugs that are fixed in unstable: - wrong header XS-Vcs-Svn in debian/control - does not enable proxy_http in debian/postinst which is necessary for apache2.2 The diff is attached. Thanks, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ Index: debian/control === --- debian/control (.../1.0beta2-12) (Revision 2301) +++ debian/control (.../1.0beta2-13) (Revision 2301) @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Uploaders: Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.16), cdbs, quilt Build-Depends-Indep: po-debconf -XS-Vcs-Svn: svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-maint/deb-maint/jwchat/trunk +XS-X-Vcs-Svn: svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-maint/deb-maint/jwchat/trunk Standards-Version: 3.7.2 Package: jwchat Index: debian/postinst === --- debian/postinst (.../1.0beta2-12) (Revision 2301) +++ debian/postinst (.../1.0beta2-13) (Revision 2301) @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ ucf --three-way --debconf-ok $tempfile $apachefile db_stop a2enmod proxy + a2enmod proxy_http a2ensite jwchat invoke-rc.d apache2 force-reload fi Index: debian/changelog === --- debian/changelog (.../1.0beta2-12) (Revision 2301) +++ debian/changelog (.../1.0beta2-13) (Revision 2301) @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +jwchat (1.0beta2-13) unstable; urgency=low + + [ Torsten Werner ] + * Fix a bug in debian/control (XS-X-Vcs-Svn). + + [ Martin Lohmeier ] + * enable proxy_http, thanks Thadeu Cascardo, closes #404931 + + -- Martin Lohmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:39:11 +0100 + jwchat (1.0beta2-12) unstable; urgency=medium [ Sune Vuorela ]
please unblock magicrescue
Hi, the package missed a Build-Depends which is fixed now in unstable. Thanks, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please unblock yaws because of security issues
Hi, On 1/14/07, Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/14/07, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm, so every time a user upgrades a package, he gets to see this message? Is that really needed? We will fix that in future versions, but I don't think it is a problem in etch because yaws was not part of sarge. I have uploaded version 1.65-4 that fixes this problem and adds the missing Depends: openssl Is it possible to unblock the package? Regards, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please unblock yaws because of security issues
On 1/14/07, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmmm, so every time a user upgrades a package, he gets to see this message? Is that really needed? We will fix that in future versions, but I don't think it is a problem in etch because yaws was not part of sarge. Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please unblock yaws because of security issues
Hi, I have uploaded yaws 1.65-3 that fixes an unreported bug regarding ssl key distribution. Please unblock it. The debdiff output is attached. Thanks, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ changes.debdiff Description: Binary data dsc.debdiff Description: Binary data
Re: Please unblock kqemu
On 1/3/07, Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: because then someone cries 'iih, i don't use udev, go away with these files'? You can use ucf to create config files conditionally. Regards, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please unblock cpufire-applet
Hello, the package has been accepted for unstable right before the freeze. After some arm build problems it is now ready for etch and there are no bugs. May you accept the package for the etch release, please? Thanks, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please unblock scilab
On 12/17/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Appears to have been unblocked by Andi. Thanks! Autobuilding non-free packages still takes a long time, though. Cheers, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: please unblock scilab
On 12/15/06, Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course you should upload that to unstable. Done, but it contains 3 extra minor fixes: - change a comment - enable debugging symbols which is useful when the build fails - explicitely disable java which has already automatically been disabled on autobuilders because there are no Build-Depends on java more verbose: [ Sylvestre Ledru ] * Add debian/patches/javasci.diff to translate a comment in English, because a French accent triggered a FTBFS with gcj-4.1. . [ Aurélien GÉRÔME ] * Update debian/patches/build.diff to fix a FTBFS on alpha architecture: use built-in memory allocation functions on 64-bit architectures. (Closes: #402736) * Conform to the policy by using -g -Wall in CFLAGS and FFLAGS, but not touching optimisation flags. * Disable Java interface by default. Cheers, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/
please unblock scilab
Hi, scilab is almost ready for etch but it needs a very small patch for the alpha build. The package is build on every architecture except alpha. Should I upload the patched version to unstable and may you unblock the new version, please? The actual patch is: --- deb-maint/scilab/trunk/debian/patches/build.diff (original) +++ deb-maint/scilab/trunk/debian/patches/build.diff Thu Dec 14 23:16:10 2006 @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ LIEEELIB= AC_CHECK_LIB(ieee,main,[LIEEELIB=-lieee]) + case $host in -+ ia64-*-linux-gnu|x86_64-*-linux-gnu) ++ alpha-*-linux-gnu|ia64-*-linux-gnu|x86_64-*-linux-gnu) + MALLOC=malloc.o + ;; + esac Cheers, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
please unblock wmforkplop
The package missed the freeze by one day and the version in unstable fixes bug #398526. It has no open bugs other than this one. Cheers, Torsten -- blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/ homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how to get erlang 11.b.2-4 into testing?
Hi,
the changes between testing and unstable are:
* Fixed erlang-base and erlang-base-hipe prerm scripts.
(these are really minor fixes)
* Introduce erlang-depends to calculate ${erlang-*:Depends} for packages
that Build-Depend on erlang.
* Setting urgency to medium because this revision does not change any
existing functionality but it is important for future backports to etch.
(that would make backporting to etch much easier for packages based on
erlang and this does not touch any existing packages)
* Added IPv6 name resolution patch by Mikael Magnusson (closes: #399628)
(that adds ipv6 support)
The package is not build on every architecture for obscure reasons
(the current etch version has been built):
- alpha and sparc: the buildds have problems with unixodbc which is in
testing (!)
- mipsel: both 'libncurses5-dev: already installed (5.5-5)' and
'cannot find -lncurses' are in the build log, huh?
Maybe a simple rebuild on those architectures is enough?
Cheers,
Torsten
--
blog: http://twerner.blogspot.com/
homepage: http://www.twerner42.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: getting erlang into testing
Hi Steve, 2006/7/11, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 07:44:47PM +0200, Torsten Werner wrote: may you help getting erlang into testing, please? This requires removal of those binary packages by the ftp team, then. You'll want to file a bug against ftp.debian.org. we still need help with erlang. 32 days ago I have submitted a bug report against ftp.debian.org to remove the old packages: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=377877. Unfortunately nothing happened except there are packages waiting for erlang: http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=erlang . The current packages in testing should not be released with etch since they are buggy. The packages in sid are quite good but cannot enter testing because bug #377877 does not get fixed for unknown reasons. Is there anything we can do to get that thing resolved? Regards, Torsten -- http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
getting erlang into testing
Hello, may you help getting erlang into testing, please? It has been build on all architectures except m68k and 10 days are over. The binary package erlang-base-hipe is build on 2 fewer arches then before but this was done intentionally. Please Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] when answering. Thanks, Torsten -- http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: getting erlang into testing
On 7/11/06, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This requires removal of those binary packages by the ftp team, then. You'll want to file a bug against ftp.debian.org. Thanks, Torsten -- http://www.twerner42.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Should multi-gnome-terminal go away?
Steve Langasek wrote: If the maintainer agrees that this package should not be included with sarge, then it is of course reasonable to drop it (preferably with a transition package providing an upgrade path to gnome-terminal, if that's the appropriate replacement). It depends on the year, when sarge will be released. :-) Too many people are still using MGT today because of some of its outstanding features that are not implemented in gnome2's terminal emulator. I will MGT for sarge and ask for removal from etch if nobody takes over the package. Regards, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Should multi-gnome-terminal go away?
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Torsten Werner wrote: It depends on the year, when sarge will be released. :-) Too many people are still using MGT today because of some of its outstanding features that are not implemented in gnome2's terminal emulator. I will MGT for sarge and ask for removal from etch if nobody takes over the package. I was unaware of this. I guess I should have checked its popcon rank :) Personally, I have used both and found the new gnome-terminal to be generally superior. But I guess OPMMV (other people's mileage may vary) and they may actually like it better. ... 'I will MGT' should be read as 'I will maintain MGT'... Regards, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
scilab in sarge
Hello, please release scilab with sarge, because the 'grave' bug is not really grave and I have already changed the severity. Thanks, Torsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
