Bug#1024322: transition: dpdk
On 2022-12-22 20:43:20 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2022-12-22 20:16:36 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Dec 2022 14:52:30 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher > > wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > > > Hi Luca > > > > > > On 2022-12-17 02:12:56 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo > > > > > > > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 19:49, Sebastian Ramacher > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > > > > > > > On 2022-11-17 14:27:25 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > > > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > X-Debbugs-CC: > > pkg-dpdk-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org z...@debian.org > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Thomas and Release Team, > > > > > > > > > > > > As we did for Bullseye, we are proposing the following plan to > > allow > > > > > > Bookworm to ship with the latest LTS versions of DPDK and OVS. > > This > > > > > > will let us make use of the full LTS support windows for both > > projects, > > > > > > as we have done for the past few releases. > > > > > > > > > > > > Upload OVS built from git (with new sonames/package renames if > > > > > > necessary), new OVN, DPDK 22.11 in early-to-mid December to > > unstable, > > > > > > ideally before the 16th as we go on vacation after that, to > > finish the > > > > > > transition. > > > > > > > > > > > > Then, after OVS 3.1 releases in February, upload it unstable > > (no > > > > > > soname/transition required, as only bug fixes will go in at > > that > > > > > > point). The upstream release might happen before or after the > > > > > > 2023/02/12 soft freeze, and if it is after we will ask for an > > > > > > exception. > > > > > > > > > > > > Would this plan work for everyone? > > > > > > > > > > Sounds like that should work like last time. Please remove the > > moreinfo > > > > > tag once dpdk is ready for the upload to unstable. > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > We are now ready. dpdk, openvswitch and ovn are ready in > > experimental. > > > > uhd and collectd in unstable will need a simple binary rebuild and > > are > > > > already compatible. > > > > > > Please go ahead > > > > Only src:uhd has been rebuilt, please rebuild src:collectd too (it only > > has Recommends instead of Depends as it's a plugin-based software, so > > it won't show in apt rdepends et al). > > I'll schedule those builds once dpkd migrated. Otherwise the rebuilds > migrate before the recommends can be satisfied in testing. collect has been rebuilt. There's one remaining issue: openvswitch is causing autopkgtest regressions in ovn-octavia-provider on the 32 bit architectures. https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/i386/o/ovn-octavia-provider/29661632/log.gz Cheers > > Cheers > -- > Sebastian Ramacher > -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1024322: transition: dpdk
On 2022-12-22 20:16:36 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Sat, 17 Dec 2022 14:52:30 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher > wrote: > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > Hi Luca > > > > On 2022-12-17 02:12:56 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo > > > > > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 19:49, Sebastian Ramacher > wrote: > > > > > > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > > > > > On 2022-11-17 14:27:25 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > > > Severity: normal > > > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > X-Debbugs-CC: > pkg-dpdk-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org z...@debian.org > > > > > > > > > > Hello Thomas and Release Team, > > > > > > > > > > As we did for Bullseye, we are proposing the following plan to > allow > > > > > Bookworm to ship with the latest LTS versions of DPDK and OVS. > This > > > > > will let us make use of the full LTS support windows for both > projects, > > > > > as we have done for the past few releases. > > > > > > > > > > Upload OVS built from git (with new sonames/package renames if > > > > > necessary), new OVN, DPDK 22.11 in early-to-mid December to > unstable, > > > > > ideally before the 16th as we go on vacation after that, to > finish the > > > > > transition. > > > > > > > > > > Then, after OVS 3.1 releases in February, upload it unstable > (no > > > > > soname/transition required, as only bug fixes will go in at > that > > > > > point). The upstream release might happen before or after the > > > > > 2023/02/12 soft freeze, and if it is after we will ask for an > > > > > exception. > > > > > > > > > > Would this plan work for everyone? > > > > > > > > Sounds like that should work like last time. Please remove the > moreinfo > > > > tag once dpdk is ready for the upload to unstable. > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > We are now ready. dpdk, openvswitch and ovn are ready in > experimental. > > > uhd and collectd in unstable will need a simple binary rebuild and > are > > > already compatible. > > > > Please go ahead > > Only src:uhd has been rebuilt, please rebuild src:collectd too (it only > has Recommends instead of Depends as it's a plugin-based software, so > it won't show in apt rdepends et al). I'll schedule those builds once dpkd migrated. Otherwise the rebuilds migrate before the recommends can be satisfied in testing. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1024322: transition: dpdk
On Sat, 17 Dec 2022 14:52:30 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > Hi Luca > > On 2022-12-17 02:12:56 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo > > > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 19:49, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > > > On 2022-11-17 14:27:25 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > > Severity: normal > > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > > > Usertags: transition > > > > X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-dpdk-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org z...@debian.org > > > > > > > > Hello Thomas and Release Team, > > > > > > > > As we did for Bullseye, we are proposing the following plan to allow > > > > Bookworm to ship with the latest LTS versions of DPDK and OVS. This > > > > will let us make use of the full LTS support windows for both projects, > > > > as we have done for the past few releases. > > > > > > > > Upload OVS built from git (with new sonames/package renames if > > > > necessary), new OVN, DPDK 22.11 in early-to-mid December to unstable, > > > > ideally before the 16th as we go on vacation after that, to finish the > > > > transition. > > > > > > > > Then, after OVS 3.1 releases in February, upload it unstable (no > > > > soname/transition required, as only bug fixes will go in at that > > > > point). The upstream release might happen before or after the > > > > 2023/02/12 soft freeze, and if it is after we will ask for an > > > > exception. > > > > > > > > Would this plan work for everyone? > > > > > > Sounds like that should work like last time. Please remove the moreinfo > > > tag once dpdk is ready for the upload to unstable. > > > > Hi, > > > > We are now ready. dpdk, openvswitch and ovn are ready in experimental. > > uhd and collectd in unstable will need a simple binary rebuild and are > > already compatible. > > Please go ahead Only src:uhd has been rebuilt, please rebuild src:collectd too (it only has Recommends instead of Depends as it's a plugin-based software, so it won't show in apt rdepends et al). -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Re: Bug#1024322: transition: dpdk
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1024322 [release.debian.org] transition: dpdk Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1024322: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024322 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1024322: transition: dpdk
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Luca On 2022-12-17 02:12:56 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 19:49, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > On 2022-11-17 14:27:25 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: transition > > > X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-dpdk-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org z...@debian.org > > > > > > Hello Thomas and Release Team, > > > > > > As we did for Bullseye, we are proposing the following plan to allow > > > Bookworm to ship with the latest LTS versions of DPDK and OVS. This > > > will let us make use of the full LTS support windows for both projects, > > > as we have done for the past few releases. > > > > > > Upload OVS built from git (with new sonames/package renames if > > > necessary), new OVN, DPDK 22.11 in early-to-mid December to unstable, > > > ideally before the 16th as we go on vacation after that, to finish the > > > transition. > > > > > > Then, after OVS 3.1 releases in February, upload it unstable (no > > > soname/transition required, as only bug fixes will go in at that > > > point). The upstream release might happen before or after the > > > 2023/02/12 soft freeze, and if it is after we will ask for an > > > exception. > > > > > > Would this plan work for everyone? > > > > Sounds like that should work like last time. Please remove the moreinfo > > tag once dpdk is ready for the upload to unstable. > > Hi, > > We are now ready. dpdk, openvswitch and ovn are ready in experimental. > uhd and collectd in unstable will need a simple binary rebuild and are > already compatible. Please go ahead Cheers > > Kind regards, > Luca Boccassi > -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1024322: transition: dpdk
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 19:49, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 2022-11-17 14:27:25 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-dpdk-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org z...@debian.org > > > > Hello Thomas and Release Team, > > > > As we did for Bullseye, we are proposing the following plan to allow > > Bookworm to ship with the latest LTS versions of DPDK and OVS. This > > will let us make use of the full LTS support windows for both projects, > > as we have done for the past few releases. > > > > Upload OVS built from git (with new sonames/package renames if > > necessary), new OVN, DPDK 22.11 in early-to-mid December to unstable, > > ideally before the 16th as we go on vacation after that, to finish the > > transition. > > > > Then, after OVS 3.1 releases in February, upload it unstable (no > > soname/transition required, as only bug fixes will go in at that > > point). The upstream release might happen before or after the > > 2023/02/12 soft freeze, and if it is after we will ask for an > > exception. > > > > Would this plan work for everyone? > > Sounds like that should work like last time. Please remove the moreinfo > tag once dpdk is ready for the upload to unstable. Hi, We are now ready. dpdk, openvswitch and ovn are ready in experimental. uhd and collectd in unstable will need a simple binary rebuild and are already compatible. Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
Processed: Re: Bug#1024322: transition: dpdk
Processing control commands: > tags -1 -moreinfo Bug #1024322 [release.debian.org] transition: dpdk Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1024322: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024322 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#1024322: transition: dpdk
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #1024322 [release.debian.org] transition: dpdk Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1024322: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024322 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1024322: transition: dpdk
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2022-11-17 14:27:25 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-dpdk-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org z...@debian.org > > Hello Thomas and Release Team, > > As we did for Bullseye, we are proposing the following plan to allow > Bookworm to ship with the latest LTS versions of DPDK and OVS. This > will let us make use of the full LTS support windows for both projects, > as we have done for the past few releases. > > Upload OVS built from git (with new sonames/package renames if > necessary), new OVN, DPDK 22.11 in early-to-mid December to unstable, > ideally before the 16th as we go on vacation after that, to finish the > transition. > > Then, after OVS 3.1 releases in February, upload it unstable (no > soname/transition required, as only bug fixes will go in at that > point). The upstream release might happen before or after the > 2023/02/12 soft freeze, and if it is after we will ask for an > exception. > > Would this plan work for everyone? Sounds like that should work like last time. Please remove the moreinfo tag once dpdk is ready for the upload to unstable. Cheers > > Bullseye tickets for reference: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974588 > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974667 > > -- > Kind regards, > Luca Boccassi -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1024322: transition: dpdk
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-dpdk-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org z...@debian.org Hello Thomas and Release Team, As we did for Bullseye, we are proposing the following plan to allow Bookworm to ship with the latest LTS versions of DPDK and OVS. This will let us make use of the full LTS support windows for both projects, as we have done for the past few releases. Upload OVS built from git (with new sonames/package renames if necessary), new OVN, DPDK 22.11 in early-to-mid December to unstable, ideally before the 16th as we go on vacation after that, to finish the transition. Then, after OVS 3.1 releases in February, upload it unstable (no soname/transition required, as only bug fixes will go in at that point). The upstream release might happen before or after the 2023/02/12 soft freeze, and if it is after we will ask for an exception. Would this plan work for everyone? Bullseye tickets for reference: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974588 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974667 -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
