Bug#1061608: bullseye-pu: package compton/compton_1-1+deb11u1
On Sat, 2024-02-03 at 10:31 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2024-02-01 at 06:30 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Sat, 2024-01-27 at 10:25 +, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > * Remove 'Recommends' for 'picom' which is a fork of compton, thus > > > another X11 compositor. > > > We should not be installing two packages of this type when only one > > > asked for by the user. > > > > The same comment on the changelog wording applies here as for the > > bookworm update, but please go ahead. > > I noticed that the bullseye update has been uploaded (with the original > wording, but) but not the bookworm one. > > For the record, as bullseye and bookworm currently have the same > package version, we cannot accept the bullseye version without the > bookwork version being available in at least p-u first. > > Regards, > > Adam Hi, Sponsor has just uploaded the bookworm update. Regards Phil -- Playing the game for the games sake. Web: * Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/PhilWyett * Website: https://kathenas.org * Social Debian: https://pleroma.debian.social/kathenas/ * Social Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kathenasorg/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1061608: bullseye-pu: package compton/compton_1-1+deb11u1
On Thu, 2024-02-01 at 06:30 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sat, 2024-01-27 at 10:25 +, Phil Wyett wrote: > > * Remove 'Recommends' for 'picom' which is a fork of compton, thus > > another X11 compositor. > > We should not be installing two packages of this type when only one > > asked for by the user. > > The same comment on the changelog wording applies here as for the > bookworm update, but please go ahead. I noticed that the bullseye update has been uploaded (with the original wording, but) but not the bookworm one. For the record, as bullseye and bookworm currently have the same package version, we cannot accept the bullseye version without the bookwork version being available in at least p-u first. Regards, Adam
Bug#1061608: bullseye-pu: package compton/compton_1-1+deb11u1
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sat, 2024-01-27 at 10:25 +, Phil Wyett wrote: > * Remove 'Recommends' for 'picom' which is a fork of compton, thus > another X11 compositor. > We should not be installing two packages of this type when only one > asked for by the user. The same comment on the changelog wording applies here as for the bookworm update, but please go ahead. Regards, Adam
Processed: Re: Bug#1061608: bullseye-pu: package compton/compton_1-1+deb11u1
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #1061608 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package compton/compton_1-1+deb11u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1061608: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061608 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#1061608: bullseye-pu: package compton/compton_1-1+deb11u1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: comp...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:compton
[ Reason ]
* Remove 'Recommends' for 'picom' which is a fork of compton, thus another X11
compositor.
We should not be installing two packages of this type when only one asked for
by the user.
* Also changed maintainer to me as I am this for the package and any queries
should be
aimed at myself and n0t the QA group.
[ Impact ]
The user will get two X11 compositors plus dependencies when they only wished
for compton
alone. We should never install not asked for packages on a users system.
[ Tests ]
The fix has been extensively tested by me.
I have done build, install and upgrade tests with no negative results.
[ Risks ]
None.
[ Checklist ]
[X] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
[X] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
[X] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
[X] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable
[ Other info ]
Unsure of validity to be a 'oldstable-pu', but will submit as I believe
something that
affects the user in this way is of importance.
Regards
Phil
--
Playing the game for the games sake.
Web:
* Debian Wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/PhilWyett
* Website: https://kathenas.org
* Social Debian: https://pleroma.debian.social/kathenas/
* Social Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/kathenasorg/
diff -Nru compton-1/debian/changelog compton-1/debian/changelog
--- compton-1/debian/changelog 2020-12-16 15:06:50.0 +
+++ compton-1/debian/changelog 2024-01-26 20:10:45.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+compton (1-1+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium
+
+ * New maintainer. (Closes: #960779)
+ * Neither recommend or suggest picom. It is a fork of compton,
+so a separate product. (Closes: #1061558).
+
+ -- Phil Wyett Fri, 26 Jan 2024 20:10:45 +
+
compton (1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* QA upload.
diff -Nru compton-1/debian/control compton-1/debian/control
--- compton-1/debian/control 2020-12-16 15:06:50.0 +
+++ compton-1/debian/control 2024-01-26 20:10:18.0 +
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Source: compton
Section: x11
Priority: optional
-Maintainer: Debian QA Group
+Maintainer: Phil Wyett
Build-Depends:
asciidoc,
debhelper-compat (= 13),
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@
Depends:
${misc:Depends},
${shlibs:Depends}
-Recommends: picom
Description: compositor for X11, based on xcompmgr
compton is a compositor for X11, based on xcompmgr. In addition to shadows,
fading and translucency, compton implements window frame opacity control,
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
