Bug#1069943: Bug#1031888: emacs-nox: bullseye-security update fails to install on mips64el
On Thu, 2024-05-16 at 17:01 +0100, Sean Whitton wrote: > control: reopen 1031888 > > Hello Adam, > > On Fri 21 Apr 2023 at 10:19am +01, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [...] > > With my DSA hat on, I'm not aware of it having been confirmed to > > fix > > the issue on bullseye. I'm happy to test an updated package in the > > meantime. (FWIW the update isn't in p-u currently because of this > > issue.) > > I have prepared an update for bullseye incorporating upstream's fix > for the memory leak. > I would be grateful if you could test whether the mips64el > installation is still reproducible. > > As deb11u3 is already in p-u and tagged, I've versioned this deb11u4. > I've pushed it to the fix-1031888 branch of salsa:rlb/deb-emacs.git. > I've built a 27.1+1-3.1+deb11u4~1.gbp4104c1 package, and confirmed that it installs cleanly over +deb11u2 on mipsel-osuosl-01. I then checked the version numbers, and realised that +deb11u2 was the version that was previously failing. Checking back, all of the debian.org systems that were affected by the bug are either down or have already been upgraded to bookworm, so I'm afraid I no longer have a useful test environment for #1031888. Regards, Adam
Bug#1069943: Bug#1031888: emacs-nox: bullseye-security update fails to install on mips64el
control: reopen 1031888 Hello Adam, On Fri 21 Apr 2023 at 10:19am +01, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 12:08 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 02:04:19PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: >> > Version: 1:28.2+1-11 >> > >> > Hello, >> > >> > On Sun 26 Feb 2023 at 09:41PM +02, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> > >> > > While I suspect they are the same, there is no proof that this >> > > leak is >> > > actually the same as the mips64el installation issue. >> > >> > Looks like it was. >> >> If this was confirmed, could the fix go into the next point release, >> which would require a -pu request+upload today (or early tomorrow)? >> > > With my DSA hat on, I'm not aware of it having been confirmed to fix > the issue on bullseye. I'm happy to test an updated package in the > meantime. (FWIW the update isn't in p-u currently because of this > issue.) I have prepared an update for bullseye incorporating upstream's fix for the memory leak. I would be grateful if you could test whether the mips64el installation is still reproducible. As deb11u3 is already in p-u and tagged, I've versioned this deb11u4. I've pushed it to the fix-1031888 branch of salsa:rlb/deb-emacs.git. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature
