Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3
Hi, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote (08 Sep 2014 22:50:44 GMT) : Sure, will do once I am back from vacation. I am currently in Japan until next week. Will get back to this after my journey. Ping? Cheers, -- intrigeri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/85bnohpc8s@boum.org
Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 11:18:43PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote (08 Sep 2014 22:50:44 GMT) : Sure, will do once I am back from vacation. I am currently in Japan until next week. Will get back to this after my journey. Ping? You want an unblock for Wheezy? -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141108222311.gb18...@physik.fu-berlin.de
Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3
Hi, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote (08 Nov 2014 22:23:11 GMT) : You want an unblock for Wheezy? I realize the subject is misleading (and the bug title was changed since then), but #699806 is actually a wheezy pu bug you filed. And, two months ago, you said you would upload the package shortly. Hence this friendly ping :) Cheers, -- intrigeri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/858ujlnvvq@boum.org
Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 11:57:29PM +0100, intrigeri wrote: I realize the subject is misleading (and the bug title was changed since then), but #699806 is actually a wheezy pu bug you filed. And, two months ago, you said you would upload the package shortly. Hence this friendly ping :) Well, you're absolutely right, but I somehow forgot it after I came back from Japan and I was just wondering whether it will still make sense to make an upload when we're now in the Jessie freeze already. -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141108230043.ga19...@physik.fu-berlin.de
Processed: Re: Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3
Processing control commands: tag -1 confirmed Bug #699806 [release.debian.org] pu: dlocate/1.02+deb7u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 699806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699806 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.u699806.141001305723161.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3
Control: tag -1 patch Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-04-28): On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 16:47 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On 04/27/2013 04:45 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Apologies for not getting back to you about this again sooner. Unfortunately it's now too late to get these fixes in to r0, but I do think we should consider whether some of them are appropriate for a stable update at a later point. Sounds like a great idea. So, I should push that to wheezy-proposed-updates after the release? I haven't done any stable updates before, that's why I'm asking :). I think it's worth a review after the release of the requests we've postponed, before we ack them. I'll aim to do that in the couple of weeks after the release (after a couple of days recuperation), but feel free to ping us if you don't hear anything. I've just had a look. I think it looks mostly good to me, I'm just not an expert for the following parts: - PIPESTATUS, - bash completion, so a second pair of eyes would be appreciated for those. It doesn't look like many bugs were reported lately, so I guess we could indeed consider dlocate for wheezy-proposed-updates; since that would be a rebuild of 1.02+nmu3 for wheezy, we would probably welcome a changelog entry on top of the current source package, using the following version: 1.02+nmu3~deb7u1. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3
Processing control commands: tag -1 patch Bug #699806 [release.debian.org] pu: dlocate/1.02+deb7u1 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #699806 to the same tags previously set -- 699806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699806 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b699806.138049182223607.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3
On Sat, 2013-04-27 at 16:47 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On 04/27/2013 04:45 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Apologies for not getting back to you about this again sooner. Unfortunately it's now too late to get these fixes in to r0, but I do think we should consider whether some of them are appropriate for a stable update at a later point. Sounds like a great idea. So, I should push that to wheezy-proposed-updates after the release? I haven't done any stable updates before, that's why I'm asking :). I think it's worth a review after the release of the requests we've postponed, before we ack them. I'll aim to do that in the couple of weeks after the release (after a couple of days recuperation), but feel free to ping us if you don't hear anything. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1367171759.13168.138.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 699806 = pu retitle 699806 pu: dlocate/1.02+deb7u1 thanks On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 13:34 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: dlocate has been neglected for quite some time now. I have collected some patches to fix several minor but annoying bugs in the bugtracker and fixed the manpages. I understand that these changes are not relevant for security-related issues and I naturally accept if my unblock request gets rejected. However, I think all these changes are nice to have and bring the package into a much better shape for shipping with Wheezy. Apologies for not getting back to you about this again sooner. Unfortunately it's now too late to get these fixes in to r0, but I do think we should consider whether some of them are appropriate for a stable update at a later point. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1367073955.13168.68.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3
On 04/27/2013 04:45 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Apologies for not getting back to you about this again sooner. Unfortunately it's now too late to get these fixes in to r0, but I do think we should consider whether some of them are appropriate for a stable update at a later point. Sounds like a great idea. So, I should push that to wheezy-proposed-updates after the release? I haven't done any stable updates before, that's why I'm asking :). Cheers, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/517be51f.9060...@physik.fu-berlin.de
Processed: Re: Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). usertags 699806 = pu Usertags were: unblock. Usertags are now: pu. retitle 699806 pu: dlocate/1.02+deb7u1 Bug #699806 [release.debian.org] unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3 Changed Bug title to 'pu: dlocate/1.02+deb7u1' from 'unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 699806: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699806 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.136707396526332.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3
On 02/11/2013 08:30 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Hmm. I'm instinctively reluctant to prop up dlocate if the current maintainer isn't taking care of it and it needs deeper work. On the other hand, if it is mature and we simply need to maintain the status quo, then perhaps propping up is all it needs. It has one issue with Multi-Arch [1], but it runs fine otherwise and more people seem to be using it again after I closed some of the bugs [2]. Put less gently I suppose the question is: does dlocate deserve its place in Wheezy and just needs this little tidying up, or should we consider removing it? I would say, yes. It also has some additional nice little helper scripts for holding and unholding packages etc. I might be willing to adopt dlocate in the future if no one else steps up. Cheers, Adrian [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658222 [2] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=dlocate -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/512031df.7030...@physik.fu-berlin.de
Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 01:34:54PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: dlocate has been neglected for quite some time now. I have collected some patches to fix several minor but annoying bugs in the bugtracker and fixed the manpages. I understand that these changes are not relevant for security-related issues and I naturally accept if my unblock request gets rejected. However, I think all these changes are nice to have and bring the package into a much better shape for shipping with Wheezy. Hmm. I'm instinctively reluctant to prop up dlocate if the current maintainer isn't taking care of it and it needs deeper work. On the other hand, if it is mature and we simply need to maintain the status quo, then perhaps propping up is all it needs. Put less gently I suppose the question is: does dlocate deserve its place in Wheezy and just needs this little tidying up, or should we consider removing it? (Note I make no comment on the diff at this stage, I have not looked at it in any detail.) -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#699806: unblock: dlocate/1.02+nmu3
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dlocate
dlocate has been neglected for quite some time now. I have collected
some patches to fix several minor but annoying bugs in the bugtracker
and fixed the manpages. I understand that these changes are not relevant
for security-related issues and I naturally accept if my unblock request
gets rejected. However, I think all these changes are nice to have and
bring the package into a much better shape for shipping with Wheezy.
I am attaching the debdiff between the version in testing and unstable.
Cheers,
Adrian
unblock dlocate/1.02+nmu3
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.7-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru dlocate-1.02/debian/changelog dlocate-1.02+nmu3/debian/changelog
--- dlocate-1.02/debian/changelog 2009-06-03 03:24:04.0 +0200
+++ dlocate-1.02+nmu3/debian/changelog 2012-12-29 14:34:22.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,28 @@
+dlocate (1.02+nmu3) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix handling of multiple arguments for several commands (Closes: #563881).
+ * Fix dlocate return codes for several commands on exit (Closes: #564293).
+
+ -- John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:32:54 +0100
+
+dlocate (1.02+nmu2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Add missing -- when invoking grep command (Closes: #587179).
+ * Fix bash completion for package names in dlocate (Closes: # 658669).
+ * Fix incorrect exit code 0 on failed search (Closes: #689647).
+ * Fix parameter passing to dlocate_option_error() in dlocate (Closes: # 690758).
+
+ -- John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:42:16 +0100
+
+dlocate (1.02+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix several mistakes in manpages (Closes: #586483, #692896, #696479).
+
+ -- John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de Fri, 21 Dec 2012 11:47:08 +0100
+
dlocate (1.02) unstable; urgency=low
* fixed example in dlocate.1 man page again (Closes: #42)
diff -Nru dlocate-1.02/dlocate dlocate-1.02+nmu3/dlocate
--- dlocate-1.02/dlocate 2009-06-03 03:28:53.0 +0200
+++ dlocate-1.02+nmu3/dlocate 2012-12-29 14:30:19.0 +0100
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@
;;
(-*)
-dlocate_option_error $1
+dlocate_option_error $p
;;
(*)
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@
FILES_REGEXP=($PKGS_REGEXP)
[ $WORD_RE = -w ] FILES_REGEXP=\b$FILES_REGEXP\b
-PKGS=$(echo $PKGS | sed -e s/$SEPARATOR/ /)
+PKGS=$(echo $PKGS | sed -e s/$SEPARATOR/ /g)
if [ $VERBOSE = 1 ] ; then
echo PKGS: $PKGS
@@ -277,15 +277,15 @@
PREFIX=^([-a-zA-Z0-9_.+]+:|diversion by )
[ $RE_TYPE = -G ] PREFIX=^([-a-zA-Z0-9_.+]+:\|diversion by )
-[ $VERBOSE = 1 ] echo RUNNING: $GREP $RE_TYPE $IGNORE_CASE $PREFIX.*$FILES_REGEXP $DLOCATEDB
-$GREP $RE_TYPE $IGNORE_CASE $PREFIX.*$FILES_REGEXP $DLOCATEDB | output_filter
-result=$?
+[ $VERBOSE = 1 ] echo RUNNING: $GREP $RE_TYPE $IGNORE_CASE -- $PREFIX.*$FILES_REGEXP $DLOCATEDB
+$GREP $RE_TYPE $IGNORE_CASE -- $PREFIX.*$FILES_REGEXP $DLOCATEDB | output_filter
+result=${PIPESTATUS[0]}
elif [ $OPTION = 'DEFAULT' ] ; then
-[ $VERBOSE = 1 ] echo RUNNING: $GREP $RE_TYPE $IGNORE_CASE $WORD_RE $PKGS_REGEXP $DLOCATEDB
-$GREP $RE_TYPE $IGNORE_CASE $WORD_RE $PKGS_REGEXP $DLOCATEDB | output_filter
-result=$?
+[ $VERBOSE = 1 ] echo RUNNING: $GREP $RE_TYPE $IGNORE_CASE -- $WORD_RE $PKGS_REGEXP $DLOCATEDB
+$GREP $RE_TYPE $IGNORE_CASE -- $WORD_RE $PKGS_REGEXP $DLOCATEDB | output_filter
+result=${PIPESTATUS[0]}
elif [ $OPTION = '-s' ] ; then
DCTRL_REGEXP=^($PKGS_REGEXP)$
@@ -316,48 +316,60 @@
'-L')
if [ -s $DPKG_INFO/$PKG.list ] ; then
cat $DPKG_INFO/$PKG.list
+result=$?
else
echo Package $PKG not installed or $PKG.list is empty. 2
+result=1
fi
;;
'-ls')
if [ -s $DPKG_INFO/$PKG.list ] ; then
xargs -r ls -ldF $DPKG_INFO/$PKG.list
+result=$?
else
echo Package $PKG not installed or $PKG.list is empty. 2
+result=1
fi
;;
'-du')
if [ -s $DPKG_INFO/$PKG.list ] ; then
du -sck $(cat $DPKG_INFO/$PKG.list | xargs -r ls -1dF | grep -v @$\|/$ )
+result=$?
