Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7

2013-06-07 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le jeudi, 6 juin 2013 23.21:52, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
 On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 21:41 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
  win32-loader (0.7.4.7+deb7u1) stable; urgency=low
  
* Post-Wheezy release rebuild to update the embedded dependencies.
 
 Please go ahead; thanks.

Uploaded, thanks.

OdyX


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7

2013-06-07 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending

On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 11:31 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
 Le jeudi, 6 juin 2013 23.21:52, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
  On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 21:41 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
   win32-loader (0.7.4.7+deb7u1) stable; urgency=low
   
 * Post-Wheezy release rebuild to update the embedded dependencies.
  
  Please go ahead; thanks.
 
 Uploaded, thanks.

and flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1370630349.26493.7.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org



Processed: Re: Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7

2013-06-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 tags -1 + pending
Bug #706598 [release.debian.org] pu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7+deb7u1
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
706598: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706598
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b706598.13706303573714.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7

2013-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 tags -1 + confimred
Unknown tag/s: confimred.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid 
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed 
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore lenny 
lenny-ignore squeeze squeeze-ignore wheezy wheezy-ignore jessie jessie-ignore.

Bug #706598 [release.debian.org] pu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7+deb7u1
Requested to add no tags; doing nothing.

-- 
706598: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706598
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b706598.137055371913098.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7

2013-06-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confimred

On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 21:41 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
 I have now uploaded 0.7.4.8 to unstable and would like to get win32-loader 
 0.7.4.7+deb7u1 with the following changelog (no other change to source) as 
 follows:
 
 win32-loader (0.7.4.7+deb7u1) stable; urgency=low
 
   * Post-Wheezy release rebuild to update the embedded dependencies.

Please go ahead; thanks.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1370553712.15198.16.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org



Processed: Re: Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7

2013-06-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 retitle -1 pu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7+deb7u1
Bug #706598 [release.debian.org] tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7
Changed Bug title to 'pu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7+deb7u1' from 'tpu: 
win32-loader/0.7.4.7'

-- 
706598: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706598
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b706598.137028851719363.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7

2013-06-03 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Control: retitle -1 pu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7+deb7u1

Hi Julien,

Le jeudi, 2 mai 2013 17.38:03, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
 Le jeudi, 2 mai 2013 15.08:05, Julien Cristau a écrit :
  I think come back for r1.
 
 Fair enough. An upload to unstable would be good to have anyway, no? People
 could then test it with pre-release-almost-wheezy material before the
 stream of updates to unstable starts to flow.

I have now uploaded 0.7.4.8 to unstable and would like to get win32-loader 
0.7.4.7+deb7u1 with the following changelog (no other change to source) as 
follows:

win32-loader (0.7.4.7+deb7u1) stable; urgency=low

  * Post-Wheezy release rebuild to update the embedded dependencies.

 -- Didier Raboud o...@debian.org  Mon, 03 Jun 2013 21:31:52 +0200

Can I go ahead with the upload?

Thanks in advance, cheers,

OdyX


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201306032141.53280.o...@debian.org



Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7

2013-05-02 Thread Didier Raboud
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: tpu

Hi dear Release Team,

I just got reminded that win32-loader embeds various other packages and
that it would be great to have its subparts updated for the Wheezy
release; namely, from it's current Built-Using field:

cpio (= 2.11-8)
= 2.11+dfsg-0.1, same in unstable/testing
debian-archive-keyring (= 2012.4)
= No change
gnupg (= 1.4.12-4)
= 1.4.12-7, same in unstable/testing
grub2 (= 1.99-22.1)
= 1.99-27+deb7u1 in testing, 1.99-27.1 in unstable
gzip (= 1.5-1.1)
= No change
ipxe (= 1.0.0+git-20120202.f6840ba-3)
= No change
loadlin (= 1.6e-2)
= 1.6f-1

So grub2 being different in testing is the reason why win32-loader's
no-change rebuild would have to go through t-p-u. Of course I can upload
a no-change rebuild to unstable first to fulfill the version
constraints.

win32-loader needs an FTP-master action for the debian/tools/* change;
and it will need to also be handled on release day.

What do you think ?

Cheers,

OdyX

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 
'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_CH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_CH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130502082622.3347.42906.reportbug@gyllingar



Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7

2013-05-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was 
jcris...@debian.org).
 usertag 706598 = pu
Usertags were: tpu.
Usertags are now: pu.
 tag 706598 + wheezy
Bug #706598 [release.debian.org] tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7
Added tag(s) wheezy.
 On Thu, May  2, 2013 at 10:26:22 +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
  Package: release.debian.org
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
  Severity: normal
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
  User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
  Usertags: tpu
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
Too many unknown commands, stopping here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
706598: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706598
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.136750008826987.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7

2013-05-02 Thread Julien Cristau
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 706598 = pu
tag 706598 + wheezy

On Thu, May  2, 2013 at 10:26:22 +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:

 Package: release.debian.org
 Severity: normal
 User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
 Usertags: tpu
 
There's no such usertag.

 Hi dear Release Team,
 
 I just got reminded that win32-loader embeds various other packages and
 that it would be great to have its subparts updated for the Wheezy
 release; namely, from it's current Built-Using field:
 
 cpio (= 2.11-8)
   = 2.11+dfsg-0.1, same in unstable/testing
 debian-archive-keyring (= 2012.4)
   = No change
 gnupg (= 1.4.12-4)
   = 1.4.12-7, same in unstable/testing
 grub2 (= 1.99-22.1)
   = 1.99-27+deb7u1 in testing, 1.99-27.1 in unstable
 gzip (= 1.5-1.1)
   = No change
 ipxe (= 1.0.0+git-20120202.f6840ba-3)
   = No change
 loadlin (= 1.6e-2)
   = 1.6f-1
 
 So grub2 being different in testing is the reason why win32-loader's
 no-change rebuild would have to go through t-p-u. Of course I can upload
 a no-change rebuild to unstable first to fulfill the version
 constraints.
 
 win32-loader needs an FTP-master action for the debian/tools/* change;
 and it will need to also be handled on release day.
 
 What do you think ?
 
I think come back for r1.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#706598: tpu: win32-loader/0.7.4.7

2013-05-02 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le jeudi, 2 mai 2013 15.08:05, Julien Cristau a écrit :
  Usertags: tpu
 
 There's no such usertag.

Damn. Trying to get inspiration from existing requests doesn't work well 
apparently.

  What do you think ?
 
 I think come back for r1.

Fair enough. An upload to unstable would be good to have anyway, no? People 
could then test it with pre-release-almost-wheezy material before the stream 
of updates to unstable starts to flow.

Cheers,

OdyX


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.