Bug#711736: pu: package vimperator/3.3-2

2015-01-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt

On 2014-01-21 22:12, Francois Marier wrote:

On 2014-01-21 at 18:20:32, intrigeri wrote:

Cyril Brulebois wrote (23 Sep 2013 04:02:26 GMT) :
 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-06-09):
 Control: tags -1 + moreinfo wheezy

 it's been 3+ months now.

... and now 7+ months.


Sorry, I've obviously dropped the ball here.

If anybody wants to take this bug over and prepare/test a package for
stable, I'd be happy to review and sponsor if needed.


It doesn't look like anything happened in the meantime.

Do we know what's required to make the package work with the current 
iceweasel in wheezy?


Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/696599aab63af722cd6cd4531b612...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Bug#711736: pu: package vimperator/3.3-2

2015-01-17 Thread Francois Marier
On 2015-01-17 at 12:14:21, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
 It doesn't look like anything happened in the meantime.
 
 Do we know what's required to make the package work with the current
 iceweasel in wheezy?

Now that stable and unstable are tracking the same version of iceweasel, I'm
guessing we need to upload the unstable version of iceweasel as a stable
wheezy update.

Francois

-- 
Francois Marier   identi.ca/fmarier
http://fmarier.org  twitter.com/fmarier


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150117173852.ge1...@akranes.dyndns.org



Bug#711736: pu: package vimperator/3.3-2

2014-01-21 Thread intrigeri
Hi,

Cyril Brulebois wrote (23 Sep 2013 04:02:26 GMT) :
 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-06-09):
 Control: tags -1 + moreinfo wheezy

 it's been 3+ months now.

... and now 7+ months.

 Is it still compatible with Iceweasel 10.0, which is still in stable
 for the moment at least?

 Same question with s/10/17/ now I guess…

... and soon with Iceweasel 24, presumably.

François: ping?

Cheers,
--
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85zjmpp7z3@boum.org



Bug#711736: pu: package vimperator/3.3-2

2014-01-21 Thread Francois Marier
On 2014-01-21 at 18:20:32, intrigeri wrote:
 Cyril Brulebois wrote (23 Sep 2013 04:02:26 GMT) :
  Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-06-09):
  Control: tags -1 + moreinfo wheezy
 
  it's been 3+ months now.
 
 ... and now 7+ months.

Sorry, I've obviously dropped the ball here.

If anybody wants to take this bug over and prepare/test a package for
stable, I'd be happy to review and sponsor if needed.

Francois


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140121221203.ga9...@isafjordur.dyndns.org



Bug#711736: pu: package vimperator/3.3-2

2013-09-22 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Francois,

Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-06-09):
 Control: tags -1 + moreinfo wheezy

it's been 3+ months now.

 On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 19:13 +1200, Francois Marier wrote:
  Iceweasel 17 got pushed to stable through a security update.
 
 It's currently not actually made it to stable itself fwiw, as it FTBFS
 on several architectures.

stable-new has 17.0.8esr-2~deb7u1 now, available everywhere AFAICS.

  The version of iceweasel-vimperator that's in stable is not
  compatible with Iceweasel 17 and the security team has suggested I
  uploaded an updated package to stable-proposed.
  
  The package I would be uploading is simply the one that's currently
  in unstable (upstream release 3.7.1). It is compatible with
  Iceweasel up to 21 so it should be good for a while.
 
 Is it still compatible with Iceweasel 10.0, which is still in stable
 for the moment at least?

Same question with s/10/17/ now I guess…

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#711736: pu: package vimperator/3.3-2

2013-06-09 Thread Francois Marier
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Iceweasel 17 got pushed to stable through a security update.

The version of iceweasel-vimperator that's in stable is not compatible with
Iceweasel 17 and the security team has suggested I uploaded an updated
package to stable-proposed.

The package I would be uploading is simply the one that's currently in unstable
(upstream release 3.7.1). It is compatible with Iceweasel up to 21 so it should
be good for a while.

Francois


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20130609071313.29674.58541.report...@isafjordur.dyndns.org



breakage by iceweasel 17 (was Re: Bug#711736: pu: package vimperator/3.3-2

2013-06-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi,

On Sonntag, 9. Juni 2013, Francois Marier wrote:
 Iceweasel 17 got pushed to stable through a security update.
 
 The version of iceweasel-vimperator that's in stable is not compatible with
 Iceweasel 17...

same with xul-ext-foxyproxy-standard (#711739) - I wonder how many other 
packages are broken by the iceweasel 17 update...


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: breakage by iceweasel 17 (was Re: Bug#711736: pu: package vimperator/3.3-2

2013-06-09 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sonntag, 9. Juni 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
 same with xul-ext-foxyproxy-standard (#711739) - I wonder how many other
 packages are broken by the iceweasel 17 update...

I've rescheduled all xul-ext* packages on piuparts.d.o for retesting and am 
currently investigating whether to also reschedule all logs with the string 
iceweasel in them...




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Processed: Re: Bug#711736: pu: package vimperator/3.3-2

2013-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 tags -1 + moreinfo wheezy
Bug #711736 [release.debian.org] pu: package vimperator/3.3-2
Added tag(s) wheezy and moreinfo.

-- 
711736: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711736
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b711736.137077346411664.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#711736: pu: package vimperator/3.3-2

2013-06-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo wheezy

On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 19:13 +1200, Francois Marier wrote:
 Iceweasel 17 got pushed to stable through a security update.

It's currently not actually made it to stable itself fwiw, as it FTBFS
on several architectures.

 The version of iceweasel-vimperator that's in stable is not compatible with
 Iceweasel 17 and the security team has suggested I uploaded an updated
 package to stable-proposed.
 
 The package I would be uploading is simply the one that's currently in 
 unstable
 (upstream release 3.7.1). It is compatible with Iceweasel up to 21 so it 
 should
 be good for a while.

Is it still compatible with Iceweasel 10.0, which is still in stable for
the moment at least?

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1370771975.14818.6.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org