Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1

2015-04-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 00:49 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
 Hi Adam (2015.03.28_21:09:54_+0200)
  Argh, this somehow fell through the cracks again. :-(
 
 And then I put this off for two weeks, and it's now out of date.
 
 New revision, including the 8.0 change, but not 7.0, as discussed. Based
 on #782668:

That looks fine, thanks.

[...]
 Apologies for the age of this bug. I get lazy sometimes.

I can't exactly complain...

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1429978609.18212.22.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk



Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1

2015-04-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Stefano Rivera wrote:
 +- Correct EOL date of Debian 6.0 Squeeze to 2014-05-31.

FWIW, Debian 6 Squeeze is supported for at least 5 years (i.e. 2016-02-06) and
most likely until Wheezy is no longer supported (i.e. 2016-04-24).

cf http://wiki.debian.org/LTS

-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150416090058.gb6...@home.ouaza.com



Re: Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1

2015-04-16 Thread Stuart Prescott
Hi Raphael,

 +- Correct EOL date of Debian 6.0 Squeeze to 2014-05-31.
 
 FWIW, Debian 6 Squeeze is supported for at least 5 years (i.e. 2016-02-06)
 and most likely until Wheezy is no longer supported (i.e. 2016-04-24).
 
 cf http://wiki.debian.org/LTS

There is an on-going confusion in the wider Debian community about whether 
squeeze is still supported or EOL.

The squeeze-lts work does not cover all of squeeze -- there are significant 
limitations in the packages and archs covered. It would be inappropriate to 
indicate to users that other archs were supported by saying that squeeze is 
still a supported release. 

From the very first line of the wiki page you linked to:

LTS (Long Term Support) is a project for providing security
patches after oldstable reached its end of life. 

which would agree with distro-info-data in stating that squeeze is EOL.

As much as squeeze-lts is a great initiative, it's not true to say that 
squeeze is still a supported release. I guess that makes it EOL and it wants 
an EOL date that reflects when that change happened: 2014-05-31

Stuart

-- 
Stuart Prescotthttp://www.nanonanonano.net/   stu...@nanonanonano.net
Debian Developer   http://www.debian.org/ stu...@debian.org
GPG fingerprint90E2 D2C1 AD14 6A1B 7EBB 891D BBC1 7EBB 1396 F2F7




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/mgo2uv$ofa$1...@ger.gmane.org



Re: Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1

2015-04-16 Thread Raphael Hertzog
[ Moving it to -lts to continue the discussion ]

Hi,

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Stuart Prescott wrote:
  cf http://wiki.debian.org/LTS
 
 There is an on-going confusion in the wider Debian community about whether 
 squeeze is still supported or EOL.

Where did you notice any confusion?

 The squeeze-lts work does not cover all of squeeze -- there are significant 
 limitations in the packages and archs covered. It would be inappropriate to 
 indicate to users that other archs were supported by saying that squeeze is 
 still a supported release. 

It's also inappropriate to say that it's EOL when 98% of the users who
are using amd64/i386 are still covered.

Yes there are packages which are unsupported in Squeeze but very much
like there are unsupported packages in Wheezy right now:

Squeeze:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/debian-security-support.git/plain/security-support-ended.deb6
Wheezy:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/debian-security-support.git/plain/security-support-ended.deb7
+ chromium cf https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776904

It's just that the list expands over time as more and more packages
get unsupportable when upstream no longer supports them. And we try to
avoid this by backporting newer upstream version when there's no other
solution (we did this recently for wireshark in squeeze). (And we would
love to shorten the list of unsupported packages if we had more
resources)

 From the very first line of the wiki page you linked to:
 
 LTS (Long Term Support) is a project for providing security
 patches after oldstable reached its end of life. 
 
 which would agree with distro-info-data in stating that squeeze is EOL.

Or that we should rephrase our description. We are working hand in hand
with security team to provide a continuity in security support. EOL is in
2016 but in the interim, there are restrictions in what is truly
supported.

 As much as squeeze-lts is a great initiative, it's not true to say that 
 squeeze is still a supported release. I guess that makes it EOL and it wants 
 an EOL date that reflects when that change happened: 2014-05-31

I disagree. But I really don't care about distro-info so I will not
discuss this further in this context.

That said I believe it's important to clarify the situation of squeeze.
Your EOL description is misleading (and not really thankful of the work
that Debian LTS team members have put into Squeeze).

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150416140223.gb18...@home.ouaza.com



Re: Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1

2015-04-16 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 04:02:23PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
 Yes there are packages which are unsupported in Squeeze but very much
 like there are unsupported packages in Wheezy right now:

Also, all other distros with long support have some level of reduced
support over time, see for example the requirements for
fixes in RHEL in it's later support stages, so having a few packages
not supported in squeeze-lts is fairly common.

We shouldn't label the LTS phase as second class.

Cheers,
Moritz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150416160236.GB7902@pisco.westfalen.local



Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1

2015-04-16 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Raphael (2015.04.16_11:00:58_+0200)
 FWIW, Debian 6 Squeeze is supported for at least 5 years (i.e. 2016-02-06) and
 most likely until Wheezy is no longer supported (i.e. 2016-04-24).
 
 cf http://wiki.debian.org/LTS

We could hack that in, but we should really support LTS separately. This
is #782685.

SR

-- 
Stefano Rivera
  http://tumbleweed.org.za/
  +1 415 683 3272


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150416164917.ga3...@bach.rivera.co.za



Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1

2015-04-15 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Adam (2015.03.28_21:09:54_+0200)
 Argh, this somehow fell through the cracks again. :-(

And then I put this off for two weeks, and it's now out of date.

New revision, including the 8.0 change, but not 7.0, as discussed. Based
on #782668:

diff -Nru distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian/changelog 
distro-info-data-0.26~deb7u1/debian/changelog
--- distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian/changelog   2013-10-21 
11:13:46.0 -0400
+++ distro-info-data-0.26~deb7u1/debian/changelog   2015-04-15 
18:35:51.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+distro-info-data (0.26~deb7u1) stable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Backport updates up to 0.26:
+- Correct EOL date of Debian 6.0 Squeeze to 2014-05-31.
+- Correct Debian 8 version (was 8.0).
+- Update EOL date of Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal to 2014-05-16.
+- Update EOL date of Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtai to 2014-01-27.
+- Add Ubuntu 14.10, Utopic Unicorn.
+- Add Ubuntu 15.04, Vivid Vervet.
+- Add Debian 9 and 10 codenames (with provisional creation dates).
+
+ -- Stefano Rivera stefa...@debian.org  Sun, 26 Oct 2014 14:14:45 -0700
+
 distro-info-data (0.17~deb7u1) stable; urgency=low
 
   * Add Ubuntu 14.04, Trusty Tahr. (Closes: #726696, 727020)
diff -Nru distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian.csv 
distro-info-data-0.26~deb7u1/debian.csv
--- distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian.csv 2013-10-21 10:58:51.0 
-0400
+++ distro-info-data-0.26~deb7u1/debian.csv 2015-04-15 18:29:12.0 
-0400
@@ -9,8 +9,10 @@
 3.1,Sarge,sarge,2002-07-19,2005-06-06,2008-03-30
 4.0,Etch,etch,2005-06-06,2007-04-08,2010-02-15
 5.0,Lenny,lenny,2007-04-08,2009-02-14,2012-02-06
-6.0,Squeeze,squeeze,2009-02-14,2011-02-06,2014-05-04
+6.0,Squeeze,squeeze,2009-02-14,2011-02-06,2014-05-31
 7.0,Wheezy,wheezy,2011-02-06,2013-05-04
-8.0,Jessie,jessie,2013-05-04
+8,Jessie,jessie,2013-05-04,2015-04-25
+9,Stretch,stretch,2015-04-25
+10,Buster,buster,2018-07-01
 ,Sid,sid,1993-08-16
 ,Experimental,experimental,1993-08-16
diff -Nru distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/ubuntu.csv 
distro-info-data-0.26~deb7u1/ubuntu.csv
--- distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/ubuntu.csv 2013-10-21 10:58:51.0 
-0400
+++ distro-info-data-0.26~deb7u1/ubuntu.csv 2015-04-15 18:29:34.0 
-0400
@@ -15,7 +15,9 @@
 11.04,Natty Narwhal,natty,2010-10-10,2011-04-28,2012-10-28
 11.10,Oneiric Ocelot,oneiric,2011-04-28,2011-10-13,2013-05-09
 12.04 LTS,Precise Pangolin,precise,2011-10-13,2012-04-26,2017-04-26
-12.10,Quantal Quetzal,quantal,2012-04-26,2012-10-18,2014-04-18
-13.04,Raring Ringtail,raring,2012-10-18,2013-04-25,2014-01-25
+12.10,Quantal Quetzal,quantal,2012-04-26,2012-10-18,2014-05-16
+13.04,Raring Ringtail,raring,2012-10-18,2013-04-25,2014-01-27
 13.10,Saucy Salamander,saucy,2013-04-25,2013-10-17,2014-07-17
 14.04 LTS,Trusty Tahr,trusty,2013-10-17,2014-04-17,2019-04-17
+14.10,Utopic Unicorn,utopic,2014-04-17,2014-10-23,2015-07-23
+15.04,Vivid Vervet,vivid,2014-10-23,2015-04-23,2016-01-23

Apologies for the age of this bug. I get lazy sometimes.

SR

-- 
Stefano Rivera
  http://tumbleweed.org.za/
  +1 415 683 3272


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150415224907.ga3...@bach.rivera.co.za



Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1

2015-03-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 06:19 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
 Hi Adam (2015.01.06_22:11:55_+0200)
  To summarise discussions from IRC, Julien pointed out that there are a
  number of other places where we still refer to Wheezy as 7.0, including
  the Release Notes and debian-installer-netboot-images. Combined with the
  fact that this would be a change in stable, I think we should leave the
  Wheezy package as-is in terms of referring to Wheezy as 7.0.
 
 Does that apply to only Wheezy, or Jessie too?

Argh, this somehow fell through the cracks again. :-(

I'm more okay with having the change in Jessie, so let's leave that as
is.

As per my earlier message, please feel free to go ahead with an upload
of the most recently proposed changes (other than the 7.0-7).

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1427569794.1708.24.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk



Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1

2015-01-07 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Adam (2015.01.06_22:11:55_+0200)
 To summarise discussions from IRC, Julien pointed out that there are a
 number of other places where we still refer to Wheezy as 7.0, including
 the Release Notes and debian-installer-netboot-images. Combined with the
 fact that this would be a change in stable, I think we should leave the
 Wheezy package as-is in terms of referring to Wheezy as 7.0.

Does that apply to only Wheezy, or Jessie too?

SR

-- 
Stefano Rivera
  http://tumbleweed.org.za/
  +1 415 683 3272


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150108041908.gw3...@bach.rivera.co.za



Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1

2015-01-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed

On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 08:35 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
 Hi Adam (2015.01.02_18:49:41_+0200)
  Apologies for the delay in getting back to you regarding this. I think
  when I previously looked at the request I assumed that we meant the
  maintainers, rather than also the Release Team.
 
 It meant everyone. But the RT have the final say, so mostly you :)

:)

 I also canvassed Benjamin's vote, and he thinks we should do 7.0 - 7.

To summarise discussions from IRC, Julien pointed out that there are a
number of other places where we still refer to Wheezy as 7.0, including
the Release Notes and debian-installer-netboot-images. Combined with the
fact that this would be a change in stable, I think we should leave the
Wheezy package as-is in terms of referring to Wheezy as 7.0.

Please feel free to go ahead with an upload containing the remainder of
the changes from your most recent proposed diff (2014-11-01).
Unfortunately the window for the 7.8 point release has now closed, but
we could potentially look at a wheezy-updates release afterwards.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1420575115.23186.9.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk



Processed: Re: Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1

2015-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #746946 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
746946: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746946
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b746946.142057512515613.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1

2015-01-05 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Adam (2015.01.02_18:49:41_+0200)
 Apologies for the delay in getting back to you regarding this. I think
 when I previously looked at the request I assumed that we meant the
 maintainers, rather than also the Release Team.

It meant everyone. But the RT have the final say, so mostly you :)

I also canvassed Benjamin's vote, and he thinks we should do 7.0 - 7.

He also thinks we should roll in 0.24 changes (Debian 9 + 10) but I
think that should get into testing first, and he hasn't done anything to
make that happen...

 I agree that 7.0 is wrong, although it does always worry me changing
 stuff like this. If it's unlikely to have been used, maybe just an
 explicit mention somewhere obvious would suffice, so that people notice
 and can amend things if they are relying on it?

How obvious? A NEWS.Debian entry?

SR

-- 
Stefano Rivera
  http://tumbleweed.org.za/
  +1 415 683 3272


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1

2015-01-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 03:02 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
[...]
   I'd argue that 8 would be right for Jessie and 7.0 somewhat wrong for
   Wheezy, hence I'd tend to agree to the change. Stefano, where is this
   used?
  
  I don't know of anything that uses the --release flag (or that data).
  
  It's possible that people use it in their own scripts, but this isn't
  something that's very useful for automated tasks. The codenames tend to
  be the important bit.
 
 We still need to make a decision on this bit. I've left that patch in,
 for now.

Apologies for the delay in getting back to you regarding this. I think
when I previously looked at the request I assumed that we meant the
maintainers, rather than also the Release Team.

I agree that 7.0 is wrong, although it does always worry me changing
stuff like this. If it's unlikely to have been used, maybe just an
explicit mention somewhere obvious would suffice, so that people notice
and can amend things if they are relying on it?

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1420217381.25545.8.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk



Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1

2014-12-28 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi 746946 (2014.11.01_03:02:58_+0200)
 We still need to make a decision on this bit. I've left that patch in,
 for now.

Ping?

SR

-- 
Stefano Rivera
  http://tumbleweed.org.za/
  H: +27 21 461 1230 C: +27 72 419 8559


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141228115425.ga27...@purcell.lan



Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1

2014-10-31 Thread Stefano Rivera
Control: retitle -1 wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1

Oops, I dropped the ball on this, and now we have more updates to do.

  I'd argue that 8 would be right for Jessie and 7.0 somewhat wrong for
  Wheezy, hence I'd tend to agree to the change. Stefano, where is this
  used?
 
 I don't know of anything that uses the --release flag (or that data).
 
 It's possible that people use it in their own scripts, but this isn't
 something that's very useful for automated tasks. The codenames tend to
 be the important bit.

We still need to make a decision on this bit. I've left that patch in,
for now.

Updated debdiff:

diff -Nru distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian/changelog 
distro-info-data-0.23~deb7u1/debian/changelog
--- distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian/changelog   2013-10-21 
08:13:46.0 -0700
+++ distro-info-data-0.23~deb7u1/debian/changelog   2014-10-26 
14:23:16.0 -0700
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+distro-info-data (0.23~deb7u1) stable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Backport updates up to 0.23:
+- Add Ubuntu 15.04, Vivid Vervet (with provisional release date).
+- Correct EOL date of Debian 6.0 Squeeze to 2014-05-31.
+- Update EOL date of Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal to 2014-05-16.
+- Add Ubuntu 14.10, Utopic Unicorn.
+- Update EOL date of Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtai to 2014-01-27.
+- Use just the stable release version without the point release suffix,
+  i.e. 6.0 for squeeze, 7 for wheezy, and 8 for jessie. (Closes: #724557)
+
+ -- Stefano Rivera stefa...@debian.org  Sun, 26 Oct 2014 14:14:45 -0700
+
 distro-info-data (0.17~deb7u1) stable; urgency=low
 
   * Add Ubuntu 14.04, Trusty Tahr. (Closes: #726696, 727020)
diff -Nru distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian.csv 
distro-info-data-0.23~deb7u1/debian.csv
--- distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/debian.csv 2013-10-21 07:58:51.0 
-0700
+++ distro-info-data-0.23~deb7u1/debian.csv 2014-10-26 14:14:41.0 
-0700
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
 3.1,Sarge,sarge,2002-07-19,2005-06-06,2008-03-30
 4.0,Etch,etch,2005-06-06,2007-04-08,2010-02-15
 5.0,Lenny,lenny,2007-04-08,2009-02-14,2012-02-06
-6.0,Squeeze,squeeze,2009-02-14,2011-02-06,2014-05-04
-7.0,Wheezy,wheezy,2011-02-06,2013-05-04
-8.0,Jessie,jessie,2013-05-04
+6.0,Squeeze,squeeze,2009-02-14,2011-02-06,2014-05-31
+7,Wheezy,wheezy,2011-02-06,2013-05-04
+8,Jessie,jessie,2013-05-04
 ,Sid,sid,1993-08-16
 ,Experimental,experimental,1993-08-16
diff -Nru distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/ubuntu.csv 
distro-info-data-0.23~deb7u1/ubuntu.csv
--- distro-info-data-0.17~deb7u1/ubuntu.csv 2013-10-21 07:58:51.0 
-0700
+++ distro-info-data-0.23~deb7u1/ubuntu.csv 2014-10-26 14:23:23.0 
-0700
@@ -15,7 +15,9 @@
 11.04,Natty Narwhal,natty,2010-10-10,2011-04-28,2012-10-28
 11.10,Oneiric Ocelot,oneiric,2011-04-28,2011-10-13,2013-05-09
 12.04 LTS,Precise Pangolin,precise,2011-10-13,2012-04-26,2017-04-26
-12.10,Quantal Quetzal,quantal,2012-04-26,2012-10-18,2014-04-18
-13.04,Raring Ringtail,raring,2012-10-18,2013-04-25,2014-01-25
+12.10,Quantal Quetzal,quantal,2012-04-26,2012-10-18,2014-05-16
+13.04,Raring Ringtail,raring,2012-10-18,2013-04-25,2014-01-27
 13.10,Saucy Salamander,saucy,2013-04-25,2013-10-17,2014-07-17
 14.04 LTS,Trusty Tahr,trusty,2013-10-17,2014-04-17,2019-04-17
+14.10,Utopic Unicorn,utopic,2014-04-17,2014-10-23,2015-07-23
+15.04,Vivid Vervet,vivid,2014-10-23,2015-04-30,2016-01-30

SR

-- 
Stefano Rivera
  http://tumbleweed.org.za/
  H: +27 21 461 1230 C: +27 72 419 8559


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141101010258.go3...@bach.rivera.co.za



Processed: Re: Bug#746946: wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1

2014-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 retitle -1 wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1
Bug #746946 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.20~deb7u1
Changed Bug title to 'wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1' from 
'wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.20~deb7u1'

-- 
746946: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746946
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b746946.14148037828060.transcr...@bugs.debian.org