Bug#774819: unblock: neutron/2014.1.3-10

2015-01-10 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/10/2015 01:06 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
 Hi Thomas,
 
 On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 12:17:47AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
 Yet another patch that needs to enter Jessie.
 
 Closing this bug, as this upload has been superseded by yet another upload.
 
 Could you please make sure that the next unblock request(s) for your packages
 contain the remaining changes you want to get into jessie and that they are
 tested before you file an unblock request? Also, once packages are unblocked,
 it's preferable to let them migrate to jessie before uploading additional
 changes. This avoids the need to review the same changes again.  Obviously
 this only applies if the unblocked version doesn't introduce new issues in
 jessie.
 
 If the number of uploads for these packages doesn't go down, it's unclear if
 these packages are suitable for a stable release.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Ivo

Hi Ivo,

Yes, I am sorry that I had to do some new uploads. I have found another
issue with openstack-pkg-tools and systemd. In fact, it's James Page
from Canonical who did (Canonical is also adopting openstack-pkg-tools
for their packaging of OpenStack): if using systemd, daemons were not
automatically started on the first install because dh_installinit was
called before dh_systemd_enable in the rules file. As a consequence, I
did another round of uploads. Then I have found some inconsistencies in
the whole OpenStack suite (like the project/configure_db flag having
different values and some more...), which I have fixed. There's also
some more bugs which were filled in the BTS which I fixed.

As you wrote above, I do prefer to run a new battery of test before
asking for unblocks. This will take a bit of time, and I will let you
know soon when I'm done.

I'm sorry if this is a bit late in the release process, and also to have
wasted some of your time, but I really hope to improve quality of the
packages here (while keeping changes as minimal as possible).

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54b1c041.9070...@debian.org



Bug#774819: unblock: neutron/2014.1.3-10

2015-01-07 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hi,

Yet another patch that needs to enter Jessie.

By default, to be policy compliant, Neutron should *not* handle
the database bits of Neutron, unless the user explicitely asks
for it on the Debconf prompts. I'm not sure why Neutron had a
different behavior/debconf default value, but this patch fixes
the issue there.

Please unblock neutron/2014.1.3-10.

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)
diff -Nru neutron-2014.1.3/debian/changelog neutron-2014.1.3/debian/changelog
--- neutron-2014.1.3/debian/changelog	2015-01-06 21:40:25.0 +
+++ neutron-2014.1.3/debian/changelog	2015-01-07 23:10:06.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+neutron (2014.1.3-10) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Sets neutron/configure_db default value to false (Closes: #770944).
+
+ -- Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org  Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:05:56 +0100
+
 neutron (2014.1.3-9) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Build-depends on openstack-pkg-tools (= 21~) to ensure we have the sysv-rc
diff -Nru neutron-2014.1.3/debian/neutron-common.templates neutron-2014.1.3/debian/neutron-common.templates
--- neutron-2014.1.3/debian/neutron-common.templates	2015-01-06 21:40:25.0 +
+++ neutron-2014.1.3/debian/neutron-common.templates	2015-01-07 23:10:06.0 +
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
 
 Template: neutron/configure_db
 Type: boolean 
-Default: true
+Default: false
 _Description: Set up a database for Neutron?
  No database has been set up for Neutron to use. Before continuing, you should
  make sure you have the following information: