Bug#862941: binNMUs needed for multiple arm64 packages (#850814)
On 2017-05-19 01:52 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > Hey folks, > > As first discussed a while back, we've had a bug in gold which caused > some broken builds of some arm64 packages. These were mostly in > backports, with a few example in the early life of stretch. Now that > #850814 is fixed and we have an updated binutils in stable too, I've > re-scanned the archive for arm64 binaries with broken alignment. Please > binNMU the following (I hope I got the syntax right!): > > Backports: > > nmu haskell-cabal_1.22.4.0-2~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports -m "Rebuild > with fixed binutils" > nmu haskell-hierarchical-clustering_0.4.6-1~bpo8+1 . arm64 . > jessie-backports -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" > nmu haskell-http_4000.2.20-3~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild > with fixed binutils" > nmu haskell-mtl_2.2.1-2~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with > fixed binutils" > nmu haskell-network_2.6.2.1-3~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m > "Rebuild with fixed binutils" > nmu haskell-network-uri_2.6.0.3-3~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m > "Rebuild with fixed binutils" > nmu haskell-old-locale_1.0.0.7-2~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m > "Rebuild with fixed binutils" > nmu haskell-old-time_1.1.0.3-2~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m > "Rebuild with fixed binutils" > nmu haskell-parsec_3.1.9-4~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild > with fixed binutils" > nmu haskell-prettyclass_1.0.0.0-4~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m > "Rebuild with fixed binutils" > nmu haskell-random_1.1-3~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild > with fixed binutils" > nmu haskell-stm_2.4.4-4~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with > fixed binutils" > nmu haskell-text_1.2.1.3-2~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild > with fixed binutils" > nmu haskell-zlib_0.5.4.2-4~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild > with fixed binutils" > nmu systemd_230-7~bpo8+2 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with fixed > binutils" > nmu wine-development_2.0.3~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild > with fixed binutils" > > Unstable: > > nmu wine-development_2.0.3 . arm64 . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" > > Experimental: > > nmu wine-development_2.8-1 . arm64 . experimental . -m "Rebuild with fixed > binutils" > nmu wine-2.0.1-1 . arm64 . experimental . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" OK. All scheduled. (couple of version typos sorted) > I'm *guessing* all the Haskell packages might involve triggering more > rebuild of all the rdeps too, not sure... Hopefully someone with haskell clue will advise here... Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#862941: binNMUs needed for multiple arm64 packages (#850814)
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hey folks, As first discussed a while back, we've had a bug in gold which caused some broken builds of some arm64 packages. These were mostly in backports, with a few example in the early life of stretch. Now that #850814 is fixed and we have an updated binutils in stable too, I've re-scanned the archive for arm64 binaries with broken alignment. Please binNMU the following (I hope I got the syntax right!): Backports: nmu haskell-cabal_1.22.4.0-2~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" nmu haskell-hierarchical-clustering_0.4.6-1~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" nmu haskell-http_4000.2.20-3~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" nmu haskell-mtl_2.2.1-2~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" nmu haskell-network_2.6.2.1-3~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" nmu haskell-network-uri_2.6.0.3-3~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" nmu haskell-old-locale_1.0.0.7-2~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" nmu haskell-old-time_1.1.0.3-2~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" nmu haskell-parsec_3.1.9-4~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" nmu haskell-prettyclass_1.0.0.0-4~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" nmu haskell-random_1.1-3~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" nmu haskell-stm_2.4.4-4~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" nmu haskell-text_1.2.1.3-2~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" nmu haskell-zlib_0.5.4.2-4~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" nmu systemd_230-7~bpo8+2 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" nmu wine-development_2.0.3~bpo8+1 . arm64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" Unstable: nmu wine-development_2.0.3 . arm64 . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" Experimental: nmu wine-development_2.8-1 . arm64 . experimental . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" nmu wine-2.0.1-1 . arm64 . experimental . -m "Rebuild with fixed binutils" I'm *guessing* all the Haskell packages might involve triggering more rebuild of all the rdeps too, not sure... -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.8 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-0.bpo.1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
