Bug#909412: transition: libpodofo
Ah and please remember to also binNMU scribus-ng in experimental :) On Tue, 2 Oct 2018, 5:00 p.m. Mattia Rizzolo, wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 04:46:11PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > Yes. That (openssl) is going to block other larger transitions from > starting as > > well, so I'd rather have this one, which is small and doesn't conflict > with > > anything, ready to go in while openssl gets fixed. Thanks for checking > in any case. > > Alright, uploaded! > > -- > regards, > Mattia Rizzolo > > GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. > more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : > Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` > Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- >
Bug#909412: transition: libpodofo
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 04:46:11PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Yes. That (openssl) is going to block other larger transitions from starting > as > well, so I'd rather have this one, which is small and doesn't conflict with > anything, ready to go in while openssl gets fixed. Thanks for checking in any > case. Alright, uploaded! -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#909412: transition: libpodofo
On 02/10/2018 16:07, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 09:50:15AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Please go ahead. > > Are you sure you want to go ahead even if this is going to get stuck in > unstable thanks to openssl 1.1.1 (as it will pick a versioned dependency > on that). Yes. That (openssl) is going to block other larger transitions from starting as well, so I'd rather have this one, which is small and doesn't conflict with anything, ready to go in while openssl gets fixed. Thanks for checking in any case. Cheers, Emilio
Bug#909412: transition: libpodofo
On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 09:50:15AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Please go ahead. Are you sure you want to go ahead even if this is going to get stuck in unstable thanks to openssl 1.1.1 (as it will pick a versioned dependency on that). -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#909412: transition: libpodofo
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 23/09/2018 11:06, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libpodofo.html > > > I'd like to do the libpodofo mini transition. > > I've test built the 4 rdeps and they all built fine with 0.9.6. Please go ahead. Emilio
Processed: Re: Bug#909412: transition: libpodofo
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #909412 [release.debian.org] transition: libpodofo Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 909412: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909412 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#909412: transition: libpodofo
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libpodofo.html I'd like to do the libpodofo mini transition. I've test built the 4 rdeps and they all built fine with 0.9.6. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'` Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
