Bug#991703: unblock: openjdk-11/11.0.12+7-2

2021-08-01 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi,

On 01-08-2021 16:02, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I've just uploaded openjdk-11-jre-dcevm/11.0.12+7-1 which fixes the issue.
> 
> Should I file an unblock request?

Yes, please. Please elaborate on the items I asked last time a bit too,
like how the source is literately the same (and if not, how not). Just
for the avoidance of doubt.

Paul



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#991703: unblock: openjdk-11/11.0.12+7-2

2021-08-01 Thread Emmanuel Bourg

Hi Paul,

Le 2021-07-30 15:29, Paul Gevers a écrit :


Matthias is asking for an unblock of openjdk-11, but it breaks
openjdk-11-jre-dcevm. Are you in the position to fix this soon?


I've just uploaded openjdk-11-jre-dcevm/11.0.12+7-1 which fixes the 
issue.


Should I file an unblock request?

Emmanuel Bourg



Bug#991703: unblock: openjdk-11/11.0.12+7-2

2021-07-30 Thread Emmanuel Bourg

Hi Paul,

Le 2021-07-30 15:29, Paul Gevers a écrit :


Matthias is asking for an unblock of openjdk-11, but it breaks
openjdk-11-jre-dcevm. Are you in the position to fix this soon?


I'll give it a look. I was considering a stable update after the release
but if it's still time to update it before the release I'll do it.



As I understand it, this version is a release version. I would have
expected from you that you're on top of this and that you would have
uploaded openjdk-11-jre-dcevm already. Otherwise I'm not sure if it
makes sense to ship openjdk-11-jre-dcevm in a stable release anyways,
because it will constantly be broken by newer versions of openjdk-11. 
Or

am I misunderstanding the situation?


DCEVM is a development tools, it's not the end of the world if it lags
a bit behind OpenJDK. Fortunately it's not always broken by OpenJDK 
updates.


Emmanuel Bourg



Bug#991703: unblock: openjdk-11/11.0.12+7-2

2021-07-30 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Emmanuel,

On 30-07-2021 14:41, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please unblock openjdk-11, the next openjdk-11 security release. That could be
> done as a security update as well, the unblock would just avoid that extra 
> work.
> 
> The only packaging change is to mark the early-access version in the Debian
> package versions, which is a no-op for the final release build.

Matthias is asking for an unblock of openjdk-11, but it breaks
openjdk-11-jre-dcevm. Are you in the position to fix this soon?

As I understand it, this version is a release version. I would have
expected from you that you're on top of this and that you would have
uploaded openjdk-11-jre-dcevm already. Otherwise I'm not sure if it
makes sense to ship openjdk-11-jre-dcevm in a stable release anyways,
because it will constantly be broken by newer versions of openjdk-11. Or
am I misunderstanding the situation?

Paul



OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#991703: unblock: openjdk-11/11.0.12+7-2

2021-07-30 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Am Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 02:41:35PM +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-CC: secur...@debian.org
> 
> Please unblock openjdk-11, the next openjdk-11 security release.

And for context: openjdk-11 also follows the upstream releases within
buster-security already, so moving this to testing will also fix the
current situation where stable has a higher version than testing.

Cheers,
 Moritz



Bug#991703: unblock: openjdk-11/11.0.12+7-2

2021-07-30 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-CC: secur...@debian.org

Please unblock openjdk-11, the next openjdk-11 security release. That could be
done as a security update as well, the unblock would just avoid that extra work.

The only packaging change is to mark the early-access version in the Debian
package versions, which is a no-op for the final release build.

The debdiff is a bit large, I put it at
https://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/openjdk.debdiff.xz

openjdk-11 (11.0.12+7-2) unstable; urgency=high

  * OpenJDK 11.0.12+7 build (release).
  * Security fixes:
- JDK-8256157: Improve bytecode assembly.
- JDK-8256491: Better HTTP transport.
- JDK-8258432, CVE-2021-2341: Improve file transfers.
- JDK-8260453: Improve Font Bounding.
- JDK-8260960: Signs of jarsigner signing.
- JDK-8260967, CVE-2021-2369: Better jar file validation.
- JDK-8262380: Enhance XML processing passes.
- JDK-8262403: Enhanced data transfer.
- JDK-8262410: Enhanced rules for zones.
- JDK-8262477: Enhance String Conclusions.
- JDK-8262967: Improve Zip file support.
- JDK-8264066, CVE-2021-2388: Enhance compiler validation.
- JDK-8264079: Improve abstractions.
- JDK-8264460: Improve NTLM support.
  * Encode the early-access status into the package version. LP: #1934895.

 -- Matthias Klose   Wed, 21 Jul 2021 09:03:54 +0200

openjdk-11 (11.0.12+6-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * OpenJDK 11.0.12+6 build (early access).

 -- Matthias Klose   Wed, 07 Jul 2021 12:00:44 +0200

openjdk-11 (11.0.12+4-1) unstable; urgency=medium

  * OpenJDK 11.0.12+4 build (early access).
  * Don't apply the m68k-support patch, needs an update.

 -- Matthias Klose   Thu, 27 May 2021 11:37:31 +0200