Please let fonts-liberation migrate to testing

2013-08-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath 
Dear release team,

src:fonts-liberation_1.07.2-7 is currently stuck in unstable. Britney
hesitates to let it migrate to testing, because it does not provide the
ttf-liberation transitional package anymore. However, that transition
has been done in the previous release cycle, so please allow its
migration.

Thank you!

- Fabian



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1376991988.7512.166.ca...@kff50.ghi.rwth-aachen.de

Re: Please let fonts-liberation migrate to testing

2013-08-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois 
Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com (2013-08-20):
 Dear release team,
 
 src:fonts-liberation_1.07.2-7 is currently stuck in unstable. Britney
 hesitates to let it migrate to testing, because it does not provide the
 ttf-liberation transitional package anymore. However, that transition
 has been done in the previous release cycle, so please allow its
 migration.

Many packages still want ttf-liberation badly:

kibi@franck:~$ dak rm -Rn -b ttf-liberation -s testing
Will remove the following packages from testing:

ttf-liberation |   1.07.2-6 | all

Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org

--- Reason ---

--

Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
freedink: freedink-engine
gcstar: gcstar
gosa: gosa
moovida-plugins-bad: moovida-plugins-bad
openwalnut: libopenwalnut1
osgearth: osgearth
sisu: sisu-pdf
spotweb: spotweb
tasksel: task-hungarian-desktop
xbmc: xbmc

# Broken Build-Depends:
liquidsoap: ttf-liberation
navit: ttf-liberation

Dependency problem found.

Mraw,
KiBi.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130820100840.gd27...@mraw.org

Re: Please let fonts-liberation migrate to testing

2013-08-20 Thread Christian PERRIER 
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
 Fabian Greffrath fab...@greffrath.com (2013-08-20):
  Dear release team,
  
  src:fonts-liberation_1.07.2-7 is currently stuck in unstable. Britney
  hesitates to let it migrate to testing, because it does not provide the
  ttf-liberation transitional package anymore. However, that transition
  has been done in the previous release cycle, so please allow its
  migration.
 
 Many packages still want ttf-liberation badly:

 tasksel: task-hungarian-desktop

THe fix for that one is pending. I'll upload a new tasksel to get rid
of this.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Please let fonts-liberation migrate to testing

2013-08-20 Thread Julien Cristau 
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:46:28 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:

 Dear release team,
 
 src:fonts-liberation_1.07.2-7 is currently stuck in unstable. Britney
 hesitates to let it migrate to testing, because it does not provide the
 ttf-liberation transitional package anymore. However, that transition
 has been done in the previous release cycle, so please allow its
 migration.
 
No, the transition is not done.  If you want the new version to
migrate, bring the transitional package back until you've updated the
rdeps.  (This whole renaming game with font packages seems entirely
pointless...)

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Please let fonts-liberation migrate to testing

2013-08-20 Thread Christian PERRIER 
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
 On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:46:28 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
 
  Dear release team,
  
  src:fonts-liberation_1.07.2-7 is currently stuck in unstable. Britney
  hesitates to let it migrate to testing, because it does not provide the
  ttf-liberation transitional package anymore. However, that transition
  has been done in the previous release cycle, so please allow its
  migration.
  
 No, the transition is not done.  If you want the new version to
 migrate, bring the transitional package back until you've updated the
 rdeps.  (This whole renaming game with font packages seems entirely
 pointless...)

It is not:
- consistency with other distros
- stupidly naming packages after the format of the font file
- not having font as part of the name of a font package

So, no, it is not pointless.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature