Re: Please consider cpufreqd 1.2.3-1 for Sarge
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 08:25:17PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: Uploaded and waiting to build. Thanks again for your time. Approved Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please consider cpufreqd 1.2.3-1 for Sarge
Hi Mattia, On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 06:16:15PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:54:54PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:08:26PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: I uploaded a new upstream (oh well, upstream is me) of cpufreqd. It fixes 3 memomry leaks and a segfault, changes are really trivial (diff is included below). There are no bugs in the BTS regarding those issues. Approved. Sorry to come up with cpufreqd again: I built 1.2.3-2 that adds one more debconf template translation (Vietnamese) but before uploading I'd like to hear thoughts about the possibility to push it again in order not to block 1.2.3-1 from entering sarge. A snippet from changes file ,--- | Closes: 310147 310149 | Changes: | cpufreqd (1.2.3-2) unstable; urgency=high | . |* Added Vietnamese debconf translation (closes: #310147) |* Corrected a typo in debconf templates (also cleared in translations) | (closes: #310149) `--- Also, is urgency=high ok in case of positive answers? Please use urgency=medium for translation uploads. This added translation should be ok and template fix should be fine, but you'll have to upload it soon to get it in in time. :) Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Please consider cpufreqd 1.2.3-1 for Sarge
On 5/23/05, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Mattia, On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 06:16:15PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: [...] A snippet from changes file ,--- | Closes: 310147 310149 | Changes: | cpufreqd (1.2.3-2) unstable; urgency=high | . |* Added Vietnamese debconf translation (closes: #310147) |* Corrected a typo in debconf templates (also cleared in translations) | (closes: #310149) `--- Also, is urgency=high ok in case of positive answers? Please use urgency=medium for translation uploads. This added translation should be ok and template fix should be fine, but you'll have to upload it soon to get it in in time. :) Fine, I'll be back to you this evening when I'll have a usable ftp/ssh connection thanks -- mattia :wq!
Re: Please consider cpufreqd 1.2.3-1 for Sarge
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 11:20:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi Mattia, [...] A snippet from changes file ,--- | Closes: 310147 310149 | Changes: | cpufreqd (1.2.3-2) unstable; urgency=high | . |* Added Vietnamese debconf translation (closes: #310147) |* Corrected a typo in debconf templates (also cleared in translations) | (closes: #310149) `--- fixed urgency to medium [...] This added translation should be ok and template fix should be fine, but you'll have to upload it soon to get it in in time. :) Uploaded and waiting to build. Thanks again for your time. PS: I'll be available on #debian-bugs for the next few hours if anything needs urgent attention (/nick malattia) -- mattia :wq! signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Please consider cpufreqd 1.2.3-1 for Sarge
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:54:54PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:08:26PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: I uploaded a new upstream (oh well, upstream is me) of cpufreqd. It fixes 3 memomry leaks and a segfault, changes are really trivial (diff is included below). There are no bugs in the BTS regarding those issues. Approved. Sorry to come up with cpufreqd again: I built 1.2.3-2 that adds one more debconf template translation (Vietnamese) but before uploading I'd like to hear thoughts about the possibility to push it again in order not to block 1.2.3-1 from entering sarge. A snippet from changes file ,--- | Closes: 310147 310149 | Changes: | cpufreqd (1.2.3-2) unstable; urgency=high | . |* Added Vietnamese debconf translation (closes: #310147) |* Corrected a typo in debconf templates (also cleared in translations) | (closes: #310149) `--- Also, is urgency=high ok in case of positive answers? thanks -- mattia :wq! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please consider cpufreqd 1.2.3-1 for Sarge
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:08:26PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: I uploaded a new upstream (oh well, upstream is me) of cpufreqd. It fixes 3 memomry leaks and a segfault, changes are really trivial (diff is included below). There are no bugs in the BTS regarding those issues. Approved. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
