Re: nodejs 0.2.0 supported upstream as a stable version

2010-08-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt 
On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 00:22 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
 On 22/08/2010 00:11, Julien Cristau wrote:
  On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 23:25:49 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
  
  I don't attach debdiff between 0.1.102-1 and 0.2.0-1, since
  the changes are only upstream changes.
 
  This doesn't follow.  If you want us to consider the update, then please
  send the diff you're considering.
 
 Sorry, debdiff attached.

I've unblocked the new version, after verifying that the package links
against the Debian v8 package rather than the embedded copy.

I realise that the benchmarking (via make benchmark) isn't used in the
package build, but its use of hard-coded filenames in /tmp makes me
uneasy.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1282488556.26197.7004.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

nodejs 0.2.0 supported upstream as a stable version

2010-08-21 Thread Jérémy Lal 
Hi,
the nodejs package has seen a lot of evolutions through the
0.1.x releases. As promised by upstream author Ryan Dahl,
version 0.2 will be supported on its own branch, without
API changes.
Unfortunately it's been released after squeeze freeze,
however i (with advice from my mentor Dave Beckett) think
it would be much better if nodejs 0.2.0-1 was allowed to go
into squeeze.
I don't attach debdiff between 0.1.102-1 and 0.2.0-1, since
the changes are only upstream changes.

Kind regards,
Jérémy Lal


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c70445d.9020...@edagames.com

Re: nodejs 0.2.0 supported upstream as a stable version

2010-08-21 Thread Julien Cristau 
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 23:25:49 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:

 I don't attach debdiff between 0.1.102-1 and 0.2.0-1, since
 the changes are only upstream changes.
 
This doesn't follow.  If you want us to consider the update, then please
send the diff you're considering.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature