Re: RFS: unicorn, ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio

2014-06-09 Thread Hleb Valoshka
On 6/9/14, Christian Hofstaedtler z...@debian.org wrote:
 I've uploaded unicorn, ruby-kgio and ruby-gettext.

Thanks!

 Passed over ruby-tzinfo because I'm not sure what the version bump
 means for rdepends like rails (looks like they might break). Have
 you checked that both versions of rails still work with 1.2.x?

No, I don't use rails. But I according to tzinfo's changelog 1.2.0 and
1.2.1 are merely a bugfix releases and shouldn't break anything. But
let's wait for Antonio.

 It'd help if the ruby-aggregate git were in a state that would allow
 releasing. Could you look at that, please?

Is it impossible to make release 0.2.2-1+b1? If not, I'll prepare
0.2.2-2, it has some pending changes.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAAB-KcmR=pe8k9fa718gikmo+fgpeschxbxdkx4h6xff9br...@mail.gmail.com



Re: RFS: unicorn, ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio

2014-06-09 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
* Hleb Valoshka 375...@gmail.com [140609 21:35]:
 On 6/9/14, Christian Hofstaedtler z...@debian.org wrote:
  It'd help if the ruby-aggregate git were in a state that would allow
  releasing. Could you look at that, please?
 
 Is it impossible to make release 0.2.2-1+b1? If not, I'll prepare
 0.2.2-2, it has some pending changes.

The only thing I can do is a sourceful upload of, say, 0.2.2-1.1 --
afterall ruby-aggregate is an arch:all package, so there's no binNMU
process for it.

-- 
 ,''`.  Christian Hofstaedtler z...@debian.org
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   7D1A CFFA D9E0 806C 9C4C  D392 5C13 D6DB 9305 2E03
  `-



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature