Re: Bug#845081: Bug##845081: wmbiff FTBFS on s390x: test failure
On 12/02/2016 12:58 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:44:05AM -0500, Doug Torrance wrote: On 12/02/2016 09:26 AM, Bastian Blank wrote: You know, Debian actually has a s390x porter machine. You can use it to test such problems. Yeah, I've used porterboxes in the past. I'm not a DD or DM, and the process of getting porterbox access is kind of a headache. If this fix doesn't work, I'll go that route. Oh, I'm sorry. I missed that you only got a guest user; they are not marked specially on db.debian.org. No worries. It looks like the signed short problem was fixed, but the build is still failing [1], so I'll be applying for porterbox access after all. :) Doug [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=wmbiff=s390x=0.4.30-1=1480698922
Re: Bug#845081: Bug##845081: wmbiff FTBFS on s390x: test failure
Hi Doug On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:44:05AM -0500, Doug Torrance wrote: > On 12/02/2016 09:26 AM, Bastian Blank wrote: > >You know, Debian actually has a s390x porter machine. You can use it to > >test such problems. > Yeah, I've used porterboxes in the past. I'm not a DD or DM, and > the process of getting porterbox access is kind of a headache. If > this fix doesn't work, I'll go that route. Oh, I'm sorry. I missed that you only got a guest user; they are not marked specially on db.debian.org. Bastian -- Love sometimes expresses itself in sacrifice. -- Kirk, "Metamorphosis", stardate 3220.3
Re: Bug#845081: Bug##845081: wmbiff FTBFS on s390x: test failure
On 12/02/2016 09:26 AM, Bastian Blank wrote: On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:37:23AM -0500, Doug Torrance wrote: Thanks for your reply! I've changed all the shorts to uint16_t's -- hopefully this works! You know, Debian actually has a s390x porter machine. You can use it to test such problems. Yeah, I've used porterboxes in the past. I'm not a DD or DM, and the process of getting porterbox access is kind of a headache. If this fix doesn't work, I'll go that route. Doug
Re: Bug#845081: Bug##845081: wmbiff FTBFS on s390x: test failure
Hi Doug On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:37:23AM -0500, Doug Torrance wrote: > Thanks for your reply! > I've changed all the shorts to uint16_t's -- hopefully this works! You know, Debian actually has a s390x porter machine. You can use it to test such problems. Regards, Bastian -- Actual war is a very messy business. Very, very messy business. -- Kirk, "A Taste of Armageddon", stardate 3193.0
Re: Bug#845081: Bug##845081: wmbiff FTBFS on s390x: test failure
On 11/24/2016 08:25 AM, Bastian Blank wrote: On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:46:27PM -0500, Doug Torrance wrote: Error connecting: Invalid argument connect(0.0.3.255:-7907) failed: Invalid argument I would start here. The IP/port information is converted incorrectly. I assume it's this function: | static int ipv4_sock_connect(struct in_addr *address, short port) short is signed and incapable of carrying a port. Thanks for your reply! I've changed all the shorts to uint16_t's -- hopefully this works! Doug
