Thats ok, then development will stay on my own gitlab instance and official
mirrors nonetheless are hosted by tuxfamily.
I just released v0.2 and would like to package it and push it to debian repos.
However I have no idea how to do it right. Is there some guide?
The output will be multiple packages:
- libcausal-cpp.deb
- libcausal-cpp-dev.deb
- libcausal-cpp-examples.deb (examples shall stand alone, since they are nice
to just play with... gol implementation n stuff. probably also splitting them
up once and putting them into packages like causal-gol.deb)
- causalviz-cpp.deb (analyzes causal structure and renders it into graphviz dot
graphs... in v0.2 defunct)
And in future also:
- libcausal-d.deb
- libcausal-dev.deb
- libcausal-examples.deb
BR
Ralph
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, September 3, 2020 10:25 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
> I have just added you into the Debian Science Group on salsa.
>
> Usually salsa is used to maintain the packaging stuff, but the upstream is
> hosted mostly
> on github/gitlab and similar.
>
> Best regards
>
> Anton
>
> Am Mi., 2. Sept. 2020 um 10:20 Uhr schrieb Ralph Alexander Bariz
> :
>
>> Hi Anton,
>>
>> Since I'm using Debian(in truth Parrot OS, a Debian Testing based
>> derivative) its just natural, that I want to take care to get it into Debian
>> repositories. Also I want to get it away from my quite insecure own gitlab
>> instance, having it on Debian Salsa Git would be perfect. Also I'd like to
>> pass ownership, or at least get some push from somewhere else making it
>> impossible to (get forced to) re-license it. Who knows where home-office
>> rules of theese times lead to, just want to be sure it stays AGPL. Also for
>> sure I'd like to join the team.
>>
>> BR Ralph
>>
>> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>> On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 9:35 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ralph,
>>>
>>> thanks for the introduction. Could you please shortly formulate how the
>>> Debian Science Team can be useful for you?
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Anton
>>>
>>> Am So., 30. Aug. 2020 um 14:13 Uhr schrieb Ralph Alexander Bariz
>>> :
>>>
Hi all,
My name is Ralph Alexander Bariz. I've written a, I think quite usable,
proof of concept for a runtime which should introduce a new kind of
algorithmic dedicated to the graph oriented modeling and execution of
complex non-linear systems.
Please see
https://gitlab.ralph.or.at/causal-rt/wiki/-/blob/ralph/debconf/debconf.odp
Please see the C++ POC Implementation
https://gitlab.ralph.or.at/causal-rt/causal-cpp
I request to move over the whole project group to salsa
https://gitlab.ralph.or.at/causal-rt
My salsa username is "udet".
Below I've written, for people interested in the why and probably a way to
some kind of new discrete and, error-resistant discretely, executable
physics, the thesis. I would also like this post to be seen as an official
pre-publication of this thesis.
Thanks.
Preface:
I'm system analytics and architect, no mathematician. So this wont contain
a lot of numerical math what probably also is not necessary but instead
the results of a structural analysis of what Germans call "Wirklichkeit".
While this journey begun with working out a methodology to model and
execute symmetric interaction simulations on GPU's utilizing definite
integrals I was not convinced it could allow to model and execute the
aimed complex systems observed to be real.
It continued passing by actor model systems which were more what I seek
for but still very data oriented while lacking for a definition of "the
how".
At that time I came into contact with Werner Heisenberg's and Hans-Peter
Dürr's "last assumption" defining a virtual entity they called "Wirks".
This, for me, was the key to understand what we seem to have missed all
the time. Here a discrepancy between the German and the English language
got very obvious. While a certain understanding of "the how" seems to be
deeply integrated into German language, the English language seems to
completely lack it. This discrepancy gets most obvious when thinking about
the classic definition of causality in both languages. While the English
language defines causality as the implication cause -> effect, while cause
and effect are both about the "what", the German definition is
"Ursache"(cause) -> "Wirkung" while "Wirkung" is not about the "what" but
about the "how". Also one might note, the English "reality" covers the
German "Realität" but not the German "Wirklichkeit" while the reality is
about the set of all being and the "Wirklichkeit" is the set of all
happening.
When trying to model this thought of a "Wirks" there came up a few
implications which made such a model very attractive not only
