Bug#474909: Build maxima with sbcl for lenny?
Package: maxima Version: 5.13.0-3.1 Followup-For: Bug #474909 Maybe this is the same bug as #467474? At least it looks the same to me. Although the build failure happens in a slightly different place for me, I still have a FTBFS with gcl 2.6.7-36.1 and gcc 4.3.1-2. It now seems to die the first time gcl is called gcl -batch -eval '(progn (load ../lisp-utils/defsystem.lisp) (compiler::emit-fn t) (funcall (intern (symbol-name :operate-on-system) :mk) maxima :compile :verbose t) (compiler::make-all-proclaims */*.fn */*/*/*.fn))' \ gcl -batch -eval '(progn (load ../lisp-utils/defsystem.lisp) (funcall (intern (symbol-name :operate-on-system) :mk) maxima :load :verbose t) (when (fboundp (quote si::sgc-on))(si::sgc-on t)) (si:save-system binary-gcl/maxima))' Warning: REQUIRE is being redefined. /bin/sh: line 1: 15042 Segmentation fault gcl -batch -eval '(progn (load ../lisp-utils/defsystem.lisp) (compiler::emit-fn t) (funcall (intern (symbol-name :operate-on-system) :mk) maxima :compile :verbose t) (compiler::make-all-proclaims */*.fn */*/*/*.fn))' On the other hand, if I specify ./configure --enable-sbcl make make check it seems to be OK. What do people think about building maxima with sbcl for lenny? I read that it is supposed be not as fast, but I can't compare since with sbcl the testsuite takes about 40s (Thinkpad X61s, core 2 duo 1.6GHz), while the gcl version (binary package from sid) crashes with seg fault half way through. I have the feeling Camm (the maintainer) is really busy right now, but if you could OK the idea of building maxima with sbcl for lenny, that would be great. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-trunk-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages maxima depends on: ii gnuplot-nox 4.2.2-1A command-line driven interactive ii libc6 2.7-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgmp3c2 2:4.2.2+dfsg-3 Multiprecision arithmetic library ii libice6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libncurses5 5.6+20080621-2 shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline5 5.2-3 GNU readline and history libraries ii libsm62:1.0.3-2 X11 Session Management library ii libx11-6 2:1.1.4-2 X11 client-side library ii libxaw7 2:1.0.4-2 X11 Athena Widget library ii libxext6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxmu6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous utility library ii libxt61:1.0.5-3 X11 toolkit intrinsics library Versions of packages maxima recommends: ii gv1:3.6.4-3 PostScript and PDF viewer for X ii maxima-share 5.13.0-3.1 A computer algebra system -- extra -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#474909: Build maxima with sbcl for lenny?
David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: maxima Version: 5.13.0-3.1 Followup-For: Bug #474909 Maybe this is the same bug as #467474? At least it looks the same to me. Although the build failure happens in a slightly different place for me, I still have a FTBFS with gcl 2.6.7-36.1 and gcc 4.3.1-2. It now seems to die the first time gcl is called gcl -batch -eval '(progn (load ../lisp-utils/defsystem.lisp) (compiler::emit-fn t) (funcall (intern (symbol-name :operate-on-system) :mk) maxima :compile :verbose t) (compiler::make-all-proclaims */*.fn */*/*/*.fn))' \ gcl -batch -eval '(progn (load ../lisp-utils/defsystem.lisp) (funcall (intern (symbol-name :operate-on-system) :mk) maxima :load :verbose t) (when (fboundp (quote si::sgc-on))(si::sgc-on t)) (si:save-system binary-gcl/maxima))' Warning: REQUIRE is being redefined. /bin/sh: line 1: 15042 Segmentation fault gcl -batch -eval '(progn (load ../lisp-utils/defsystem.lisp) (compiler::emit-fn t) (funcall (intern (symbol-name :operate-on-system) :mk) maxima :compile :verbose t) (compiler::make-all-proclaims */*.fn */*/*/*.fn))' On the other hand, if I specify ./configure --enable-sbcl make make check it seems to be OK. What do people think about building maxima with sbcl for lenny? Personally I think that having a slow maxima package is better than no package at all, but I have no expertise in gcl. I read that it is supposed be not as fast, but I can't compare since with sbcl the testsuite takes about 40s (Thinkpad X61s, core 2 duo 1.6GHz), while the gcl version (binary package from sid) crashes with seg fault half way through. There are open bugs keeping the sid version of gcl out of lenny. Is it possible that the bug that is keeping gcl out of testing is also causing the maxima build failures? I have the feeling Camm (the maintainer) is really busy right now, but if you could OK the idea of building maxima with sbcl for lenny, that would be great. Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#474909: Build maxima with sbcl for lenny?
David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip maxima problems]
I have the feeling Camm (the maintainer) is really busy right now, but
if you could OK the idea of building maxima with sbcl for lenny, that
would be great.
If that is the case, the RC bugs filed against the following of his packages
could do with some assistance:
#486974: atlas: FTBFS: Error: symbol `dp2dpGuBLm_N_loop2dpGuBLm' is already
defined
#475170: [axiom] Unuseable on amd64 - fails to start
#488082: cxref: Install preconfiguration fails (only 9 days old)
#487435: gcl: FTBFS [amd64]: cannot trap sbrk
#469178: gclcvs 2.7.0-84 uninstallable: requires exact obsolete version of
binutils-dev
#475676: gclcvs_2.7.0-84(sparc/unstable): Error: TYPE-ERROR :DATUM #OBJNULL
:EXPECTED-TYPE VAR NIL
#484983: FTBFS: LaTeX Error: \begin{document} ended by \end{theindex}
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
