Re: spyder/3.1.0 in Stretch
On Sun, 2017-01-22 at 09:14 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Hello Ghislain > > > A snapshot release of jedi 0.10 was recently uploaded. > > > yes :( I hope that it will not break rdepends... > > > It has been released yesterday alongside qtpy-1.2.1. Could you sponsor > > its upload, please? > > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/python-qtpy.git > > no problem, is it possible for you to upload into mentors. > then I will do the job. https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-qtawesome/python-qtawesome_0.4.3-1.dsc https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-qtpy/python-qtpy_1.2.1-1.dsc > hopefully it will be before the 25th. I am currently testing a build of the spyder packages with version 3.1.1. Ghis
Re: spyder/3.1.0 in Stretch
On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 18:46 +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 17:00 +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 16:51 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > > Hello Ghislain > > > > > > it is ok for the taurus upstream to work with 3.1.0 > > > > Great news. Meanwhile, I got the green light from Piotr to prepare a > > new update for src:python-jedi. > > Ok, this is blocked for now (although I have a working package) because > the packaging repository is in a bad state currently. A snapshot release of jedi 0.10 was recently uploaded. > > > So can you prepare the qtawesome package. > > > > I have yet to hear from Carlos on a specific issue arising with 0.4.x [1]. > > > > [1] https://github.com/spyder-ide/qtawesome/issues/64 > > > > He promised to look into it today. > > It should be released today, and I'll be ready to package it straight-away. It has been released yesterday alongside qtpy-1.2.1. Could you sponsor its upload, please? https://anonscm.debian.org/git/python-modules/packages/python-qtpy.git I will take care of qtawesome later today or tomorrow. > > > > > I will prepare the spyder package and I woud like to upload this as soon > > > as possible to let them enought time in order to fix taurus. > > > before the 25th > > > > Hopefully, we can make this work timewise. > > Carlos mentioned that they are planning to release a first bugfix > release (spyder/3.1.1) in a "couple of days". Not much news on that front yet. Cheers, Ghis
Re: spyder/3.1.0 in Stretch
On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 17:00 +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 16:51 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > Hello Ghislain > > > > it is ok for the taurus upstream to work with 3.1.0 > > Great news. Meanwhile, I got the green light from Piotr to prepare a > new update for src:python-jedi. Ok, this is blocked for now (although I have a working package) because the packaging repository is in a bad state currently. > > So can you prepare the qtawesome package. > > I have yet to hear from Carlos on a specific issue arising with 0.4.x [1]. > > [1] https://github.com/spyder-ide/qtawesome/issues/64 > > He promised to look into it today. It should be released today, and I'll be ready to package it straight-away. > > > I will prepare the spyder package and I woud like to upload this as soon as > > possible to let them enought time in order to fix taurus. > > before the 25th > > Hopefully, we can make this work timewise. Carlos mentioned that they are planning to release a first bugfix release (spyder/3.1.1) in a "couple of days". Ghis
Re: spyder/3.1.0 in Stretch
On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 16:51 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Hello Ghislain > > it is ok for the taurus upstream to work with 3.1.0 Great news. Meanwhile, I got the green light from Piotr to prepare a new update for src:python-jedi. > So can you prepare the qtawesome package. I have yet to hear from Carlos on a specific issue arising with 0.4.x [1]. [1] https://github.com/spyder-ide/qtawesome/issues/64 He promised to look into it today. > I will prepare the spyder package and I woud like to upload this as soon as > possible to let them enought time in order to fix taurus. > before the 25th Hopefully, we can make this work timewise. Ghis
Re: spyder/3.1.0 in Stretch
On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 12:19 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > Even better, I should be able to the a team-upload since I am a member of > > the DPMT too. > > Argh, python-jedi is still on svn :-(. Is it ok if I seek sponsorship > > directly to you once the fix for jedi is tested? > > I think that you should contact the current maintainer in order to see if > this NMU is ok for him. > Then I can sponsorise the upload or if he is ok it can do it. > > let's see. I sent our request to the upstream maintainer, also cc'd to the DPMT mailing-list. > > Is that something you can do already using spyder/3.1.0 in a Python 3 > > venv, or does it have to be with the packaged version? > > I contacted the taurus upstream and I will see his response. > If this is a blocker for taurus, I can not affort an upload of spyder 3.1. :(( Considering they have a test suite and a sanely crafted setup.py, it should be straightforward to test taurus in a venv with the newly released spyder version, no? Ghis
Re: spyder/3.1.0 in Stretch
On Wed, 2017-01-18 at 11:55 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Hello, > > > Thanks for sponsoring python-qtpy/1.2.0 earlier today. If all goes well > > with upstream, I should also have an update to python-qtawesome ready > > today, which should make all b-deps satisfied for the just released > > spyder/3.1.0. > > Could you prepare an NMU of python-jedi in order to have the autocompletion > available in Stretch ? Even better, I should be able to the a team-upload since I am a member of the DPMT too. Argh, python-jedi is still on svn :-(. Is it ok if I seek sponsorship directly to you once the fix for jedi is tested? > ok for me with spyder/3.1.0, it is just that we should check that it works > with taurus whcih is important for the > synchrotron radiation community. Is that something you can do already using spyder/3.1.0 in a Python 3 venv, or does it have to be with the packaged version? > > Shall we try to get this version of spyder out for Stretch then? I am > > using it extensively these days, so I could test it thoroughly in time > > before the 25th. Please let me know. > > I would says that it will be easier to support spyder 3.1.x than 3.0.x for > stretch. > So let's try :) I agree with that. Ghis
spyder/3.1.0 in Stretch
Hi Fred, Thanks for sponsoring python-qtpy/1.2.0 earlier today. If all goes well with upstream, I should also have an update to python-qtawesome ready today, which should make all b-deps satisfied for the just released spyder/3.1.0. Shall we try to get this version of spyder out for Stretch then? I am using it extensively these days, so I could test it thoroughly in time before the 25th. Please let me know. (Happy new year if I forgot btw) Cheers, Ghis
