Bug#938397: marked as done (ros-rosinstall: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:34:36 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#938397: fixed in ros-rosinstall 0.7.8-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #938397,
regarding ros-rosinstall: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
938397: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938397
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:ros-rosinstall
Version: 0.7.8-2
Severity: normal
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2removal

Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html

Your package either build-depends, depends on Python2, or uses Python2
in the autopkg tests.  Please stop using Python2, and fix this issue
by one of the following actions.

- Convert your Package to Python3. This is the preferred option.  In
  case you are providing a Python module foo, please consider dropping
  the python-foo package, and only build a python3-foo package.  Please
  don't drop Python2 modules, which still have reverse dependencies,
  just document them.
  
  This is the preferred option.

- If the package is dead upstream, cannot be converted or maintained
  in Debian, it should be removed from the distribution.  If the
  package still has reverse dependencies, raise the severity to
  "serious" and document the reverse dependencies with the BTS affects
  command.  If the package has no reverse dependencies, confirm that
  the package can be removed, reassign this issue to ftp.debian.org,
  make sure that the bug priority is set to normal and retitle the
  issue to "RM: PKG -- removal triggered by the Python2 removal".

- If the package has still many users (popcon >= 300), or is needed to
  build another package which cannot be removed, document that by
  adding the "py2keep" user tag (not replacing the py2remove tag),
  using the debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org user.  Also any
  dependencies on an unversioned python package (python, python-dev)
  must not be used, same with the python shebang.  These have to be
  replaced by python2/python2.7 dependencies and shebang.

  This is the least preferred option.

If the conversion or removal needs action on another package first,
please document the blocking by using the BTS affects command, like

  affects  + src:ros-rosinstall

If there is no py2removal bug for that reverse-dependency, please file
a bug on this package (similar to this bug report).

If there are questions, please refer to the wiki page for the removal:
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal, or ask for help on IRC
#debian-python, or the debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org mailing list.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ros-rosinstall
Source-Version: 0.7.8-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ros-rosinstall, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 938...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jochen Sprickerhof  (supplier of updated ros-rosinstall 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:18:21 +0200
Source: ros-rosinstall
Architecture: source
Version: 0.7.8-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers 

Changed-By: Jochen Sprickerhof 
Closes: 938397
Changes:
 ros-rosinstall (0.7.8-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix ancient-python-version-field
   * Bump policy version (no changes)
   * switch to debhelper-compat and debhelper 12
   * add Salsa CI
   * Drop Python 2 (Closes: #938397)
   * Add d/clean
Checksums-Sha1:
 cb839edd966a35b77eddb571b626fe7b6fab61ec 2272 ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3.dsc
 a701b8724f051ef616f55716dc6f4418ead189fc 4504 
ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3.debian.tar.xz
 01b602dcfb928620d595a61bb767b51e601e3208 7874 
ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 9cd57365954279a8cad542f4fd7a836285d714e5102a6a4226ca17179ff950b8 2272 
ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3.dsc
 05411dbef9ccff284861618923e01fcd74a34c194af644816daff3a89fb5770f 

Bug#935927: Suggests instead of comment of Python2 only packages? (Was: debian-science: migrate all python dependencies to their python3 variant)

[Sandro Tosi]

Hey Andreas and others

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 5:51 AM Andreas Tille  wrote:
> Regarding your change:
>
> Switch every python dependency to Python3 (removing packages no longer
> available, commenting out python2-only packages); Closes: #935927
>
> I'm wondering whether it would not be better to rather
>
> Suggests: python2-only
>
> packages.

i'm not very familiar on how people uses this tasks packages, but if
(say) 90% of the python modules are python3-only, how can you use that
10% that's python2 only? you cant write code unless it's very
specialized to that specific module and uses *none* of the py3k-only
packages; most likely that module will get removed if there is no py3k
support or if there is, we're gonna remove the py2 package anyway.

the reason i left them as comment is for the science team to
"remember" they used to be there and decide at a later time what to
do: is the package still in Debian and been ported to py3k? add it
back. was it removed? remove the commented line.

>  If the packages are commented out they become absolutely
> invisible while per policy suggested packages do not need to exist and
> thus the metapackages would not block a removal of the packages
> themselves.

the way we're tracking the removal (via
http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html) considers also the
Suggests fields as a rdeps. Also i dont see anything about not being
avaible as a valid state in
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#binary-dependencies-depends-recommends-suggests-enhances-pre-depends
for suggests

> Since you felt a need to change this in Git I guess you are interested
> in a soonish upload.

indeed i am :)

>  So if we have some consensus about the item above
> I'll upload to get the changes applied.

i gave you my opinion, but i'm happy with whatever the team comes up
about it, if that means we can upload soon :)

Cheers,
-- 
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#941259: marked as done (e-antic FTBFS on alpha due to enforced absence of libflint-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:34:06 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#941259: fixed in e-antic 0.1.3+ds-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #941259,
regarding e-antic FTBFS on alpha due to enforced absence of libflint-dev
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
941259: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941259
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: e-antic
Version: 0.1.3+ds-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs

e-antic FTBFS on alpha during the configure stage with [1]:

checking flint/flint.h usability... no
checking flint/flint.h presence... no
checking for flint/flint.h... no
configure: error: flint header not found

flint has now been built on Alpha so debian/control can be updated to
build-depend on libflint-dev on Alpha.  Also openmp functions on Alpha
so the disabling of openmp is not necessary in debian/rules.  I attach
a patch that attends to both of these matters.  With the patch e-antic
builds to completion on Alpha.

Cheers,
Michael.

[1] 
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=e-antic=alpha=0.1.3%2Bds-2=1565125004=0
diff -urp e-antic-0.1.3+ds/debian/control e-antic-0.1.3+ds_new/debian/control
--- e-antic-0.1.3+ds/debian/control	2019-07-12 03:35:23.0 +1200
+++ e-antic-0.1.3+ds_new/debian/control	2019-09-27 20:16:42.117758125 +1200
@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ Build-Depends:
  autoconf-archive, gnulib,
  libgmp-dev,
  libmpfr-dev,
- libflint-dev [!alpha !m68k !sh4 !x32],
- libflint-arb-dev [!alpha !m68k !sh4 !x32]
+ libflint-dev [!m68k !sh4 !x32],
+ libflint-arb-dev [!m68k !sh4 !x32]
 Standards-Version: 4.4.0
 Homepage: https://github.com/videlec/e-antic/
 Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/e-antic.git
diff -urp e-antic-0.1.3+ds/debian/rules e-antic-0.1.3+ds_new/debian/rules
--- e-antic-0.1.3+ds/debian/rules	2019-06-21 05:20:36.0 +1200
+++ e-antic-0.1.3+ds_new/debian/rules	2019-09-27 20:47:57.992018094 +1200
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ export ACLOCAL_PATH=/usr/share/gnulib/m4
 
 DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)
 
-ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH), alpha-linux-gnu mipsel-linux-gnu))
+ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH), mipsel-linux-gnu))
 DEB_PKG_EANTIC_OPENMP=no
 else
 DEB_PKG_EANTIC_OPENMP=yes
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: e-antic
Source-Version: 0.1.3+ds-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
e-antic, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 941...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jerome Benoit  (supplier of updated e-antic package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:18:49 +
Source: e-antic
Architecture: source
Version: 0.1.3+ds-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers 

Changed-By: Jerome Benoit 
Closes: 941259
Changes:
 e-antic (0.1.3+ds-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * FTBFS fix release (Closes: #941259), see below.
   * Debianization:
 - debian/{control,rules}, permit alpha port for flint.
Checksums-Sha1:
 8702a34d62168f288675d567f5a634d35b880ac4 2844 e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3.dsc
 e5d6f8aa13f9cc45af4ac13fb304122a8f2e2648 7788 e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3.debian.tar.xz
 8ee5a7bc2b1067727a290852625069d2fa79172b 6844 
e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 813dd11208a480750f4787211b3fbc394436bf7339df2600905e3821af91fa0e 2844 
e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3.dsc
 0c5029deec718fa4eda15ea0e6b10204b8df44ad4287c2e739c0824e816facb4 7788 
e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3.debian.tar.xz
 94f20fc63ce5cf248e396bd27b474ca573b125eb912805299c5ca59ca8132d48 6844 
e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3_source.buildinfo
Files:
 68f0cc979353b402d60cc2d2118119f0 2844 math optional e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3.dsc
 eeb892006c92eebde823dcab975ab8f3 7788 math optional 
e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3.debian.tar.xz
 8ace1eccb90a4949af582f9e39e49d1a 6844 math optional 
e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQRJBAEBCgAzFiEEriiuFXEN/x2H5adiP5IZpn82xosFAl2ONw8VHGNhbGN1bHVz

Bug#940679: cython3: generated code does out of bounds reads in with-dict (subclass of) cdef class

[Rebecca N. Palmer]

Control: reassign -1 cython3
Control: affects -1 python3-pandas python3-skimage
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
Control: retitle -1: cython3: generated code does out of bounds reads in 
with-dict (subclass of) cdef class

No, it is a proper Timedelta-sized space (144 bytes, not a _Timedelta's 
128).  The bug is that Cython is treating the tp_dictoffset slot (128 
bytes from the start of Timedelta) as the *start of* a PyDictObject (48 
bytes, so won't fit here) when it's actually a *pointer to* the 
PyDictObject.

This only happens when tp_dictoffset is nonzero, i.e. either a cdef
class with an instance dict (non-default but allowed), or a normal
Python class inheriting from a cdef class.

This appears to be fixed upstream (though they only seem to have noticed 
that they weren't checking whether the pointer was NULL, not that they 
weren't treating it as a pointer at all):

https://github.com/cython/cython/commit/253c25a902aef2c54de31baa22af73d0dbad2a06#diff-32655df5c2097cca93b52a2ff7583bef

I haven't checked whether this patch can be applied to our Cython 
version.  As it has been released upstream and there is already a 
request for the new upstream version (#941021), packaging this is
probably a better use of time.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#940679: cython3: generated code does out of bounds reads in with-dict (subclass of) cdef class

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 cython3
Bug #940679 [src:pandas] pandas: random test crashes
Bug reassigned from package 'src:pandas' to 'cython3'.
No longer marked as found in versions pandas/0.23.3+dfsg-6.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #940679 to the same values 
previously set
> affects -1 python3-pandas python3-skimage
Bug #940679 [cython3] pandas: random test crashes
Added indication that 940679 affects python3-pandas and python3-skimage
> tags -1 fixed-upstream
Bug #940679 [cython3] pandas: random test crashes
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> retitle -1: cython3: generated code does out of bounds reads in with-dict 
> (subclass of) cdef class
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.


-- 
940679: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940679
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#875150: Should we file a removal bug?

[Moritz Mühlenhoff]

On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 07:57:47AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:48:24PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:05:17PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez 
> > Meyer wrote:
> > > Hi! It seems there is no activity on this bug, should we file a removal 
> > > bug?
> > 
> > Adding the last two uploaders to CC.
> 
> ... as well as Uploaders in d/control in CC.
>  
> > Is anyone of you planning to upload a Qt5 compatible release candidate of 
> > qtiplot?
> > Otherwise we'll file a removal bug as we're closing in on the Qt5 
> > removalnow.
> > 
> > (Upload also happen to experimental to avoid a later roundtrip through NEW 
> > when a final
> > 1.0 comes out)
> 
> While the website[1] is announcing
> 
> 2019/09/18 - QtiPlot 1.0.0-rc10 release available. New features and 
> improvements: 
> 
> (without mentioning a Qt 5 port explicitly :-() the download area[2]
> does not contain any source download of this.  It seems upstream changed
> to a closed source model since you can only download binaries with
> restricted functionality or you need to buy a license.

I've just filed a removal bug.

Cheers,
Moritz

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:18:49 +
Source: e-antic
Architecture: source
Version: 0.1.3+ds-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers 

Changed-By: Jerome Benoit 
Closes: 941259
Changes:
 e-antic (0.1.3+ds-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * FTBFS fix release (Closes: #941259), see below.
   * Debianization:
 - debian/{control,rules}, permit alpha port for flint.
Checksums-Sha1:
 8702a34d62168f288675d567f5a634d35b880ac4 2844 e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3.dsc
 e5d6f8aa13f9cc45af4ac13fb304122a8f2e2648 7788 e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3.debian.tar.xz
 8ee5a7bc2b1067727a290852625069d2fa79172b 6844 
e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 813dd11208a480750f4787211b3fbc394436bf7339df2600905e3821af91fa0e 2844 
e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3.dsc
 0c5029deec718fa4eda15ea0e6b10204b8df44ad4287c2e739c0824e816facb4 7788 
e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3.debian.tar.xz
 94f20fc63ce5cf248e396bd27b474ca573b125eb912805299c5ca59ca8132d48 6844 
e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3_source.buildinfo
Files:
 68f0cc979353b402d60cc2d2118119f0 2844 math optional e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3.dsc
 eeb892006c92eebde823dcab975ab8f3 7788 math optional 
e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3.debian.tar.xz
 8ace1eccb90a4949af582f9e39e49d1a 6844 math optional 
e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=4ouM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processing of e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3.dsc
  e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3.debian.tar.xz
  e-antic_0.1.3+ds-3_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#941279: libbenchmark1: libbenchmark should be built in release mode

[Christian Biesinger]

Package: libbenchmark1
Version: 1.4.1-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation? I was using libbenchmark for the first time 
and got this message:

***WARNING*** Library was built as DEBUG. Timings may be affected.

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?

   As a benchmarking library it would probably be better to build in release, 
for better
   timings

   * What outcome did you expect instead?

  That the library was built with:
  cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
or even
  cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DBENCHMARK_ENABLE_LTO=true


*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.37-5+deb10u2rodete2-amd64 (SMP w/72 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_USER, TAINT_OOT_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages libbenchmark1 depends on:
ii  libc6   2.28-10
ii  libgcc1 1:8.3.0-6
ii  libstdc++6  8.3.0-6

libbenchmark1 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages libbenchmark1 suggests:
pn  libbenchmark-tools  

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processing of ensmallen_2.10.3-1_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

ensmallen_2.10.3-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ensmallen_2.10.3-1.dsc
  ensmallen_2.10.3.orig.tar.xz
  ensmallen_2.10.3-1.debian.tar.xz
  ensmallen_2.10.3-1_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

ensmallen_2.10.3-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:00:43 +0100
Source: ensmallen
Architecture: source
Version: 2.10.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers 

Changed-By: Barak A. Pearlmutter 
Changes:
 ensmallen (2.10.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version
Checksums-Sha1:
 8ef709920e037b3095c41b922f73514859668481 2031 ensmallen_2.10.3-1.dsc
 b8c380fc515aad8edcbb7b16bccfe829e8c441a5 1025572 ensmallen_2.10.3.orig.tar.xz
 2543a67bd88fbb1ad58fcb743e1186e38b5d8087 4004 ensmallen_2.10.3-1.debian.tar.xz
 fc39c24f243294e2c54c4e5461453e65c3704422 7364 
ensmallen_2.10.3-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 b0731a20014d2fe824e567181a5388c3c929d6b23e667e06fd4cba60e314f203 2031 
ensmallen_2.10.3-1.dsc
 de4d1ed0631f2e23f21fdaa7f1d4859e1f5712323c7f28b22c70028cdabd5853 1025572 
ensmallen_2.10.3.orig.tar.xz
 a469bad81b1e63f8223e93adbdecb9cc7fe14c4fc542c1e22e985def6bc66405 4004 
ensmallen_2.10.3-1.debian.tar.xz
 28719d6edec40b81def2e25505453609b401c6d619263f62b48c6bafdce630e5 7364 
ensmallen_2.10.3-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 ea521beecba57aaf16a46e141b43d055 2031 libs optional ensmallen_2.10.3-1.dsc
 6322ddf587adb62342c6a7b182590b74 1025572 libs optional 
ensmallen_2.10.3.orig.tar.xz
 9400f5241fa5a5d176484a1c3e1bd26e 4004 libs optional 
ensmallen_2.10.3-1.debian.tar.xz
 43eca6d53e151c2b23c4fe950bc56713 7364 libs optional 
ensmallen_2.10.3-1_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=JvFh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processing of mlpack_3.2.0-1_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

mlpack_3.2.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  mlpack_3.2.0-1.dsc
  mlpack_3.2.0.orig.tar.xz
  mlpack_3.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
  mlpack_3.2.0-1_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

mlpack_3.2.0-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:49:04 +0100
Source: mlpack
Architecture: source
Version: 3.2.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers 

Changed-By: Barak A. Pearlmutter 
Closes: 925779
Changes:
 mlpack (3.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * new upstream version
 - builds on GCC 9.x (closes: #925779)
   * bump policy
   * patch spelling error
Checksums-Sha1:
 816448b3f76dde014e294a27b112d730c3f754ab 2336 mlpack_3.2.0-1.dsc
 d948e53adb0ab261ee322c927320abb9e0c20244 2489636 mlpack_3.2.0.orig.tar.xz
 e1b46385f2a04334d0a85aa17891b8fae9e34be1 10592 mlpack_3.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 3105651b24ecf9b0412891577d0e25f414513d76 11757 mlpack_3.2.0-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 041f931fdfbd674cd7dd7299524cd95943d93765aa7728bd7f4c5aab972e9d42 2336 
mlpack_3.2.0-1.dsc
 d336cdde888f9296e9443b95978a378f7031433fdad1276ba857ef5c1d961d33 2489636 
mlpack_3.2.0.orig.tar.xz
 297a531c9d9862c789a3d0085c54fbc374666a69f981e03a54bf69a6aeb1a0e5 10592 
mlpack_3.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 2a017fc1d3583d5a0e6b287d744ce8ae83046d33ce1a0fe20b8ecbf1a908746a 11757 
mlpack_3.2.0-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 fb91d394343886aa10b5411e0a9e9c2b 2336 libs optional mlpack_3.2.0-1.dsc
 f8b9badcfcbe6416ae70d6242da3180a 2489636 libs optional mlpack_3.2.0.orig.tar.xz
 3ad146490f18e1400854cb5151dd9645 10592 libs optional 
mlpack_3.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 697afd0a4b6c0eeacfe49fc800cd2274 11757 libs optional 
mlpack_3.2.0-1_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=0viA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#925779: marked as done (mlpack: ftbfs with GCC-9)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:35:27 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#925779: fixed in mlpack 3.2.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #925779,
regarding mlpack: ftbfs with GCC-9
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
925779: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925779
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:mlpack
Version: 3.0.4-1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-9

Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the package it
was filed for.  If a fix in another package is required, please
file a bug for the other package (or clone), and add a block in this
package. Please keep the issue open until the package can be built in
a follow-up test rebuild.

The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
gcc-9/g++-9, but succeeds to build with gcc-8/g++-8. The
severity of this report will be raised before the bullseye release,
so nothing has to be done for the buster release.

The full build log can be found at:
http://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/gcc9-20190321/mlpack_3.0.4-1_unstable_gcc9.log
The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report.

To build with GCC 9, either set CC=gcc-9 CXX=g++-9 explicitly,
or install the gcc, g++, gfortran, ... packages from experimental.

  apt-get -t=experimental install g++ 

Common build failures are new warnings resulting in build failures with
-Werror turned on, or new/dropped symbols in Debian symbols files.
For other C/C++ related build failures see the porting guide at
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-9/porting_to.html

GCC 9 also passes the linker option --as-needed by default; typical
build issues are passing libraries before object files to the linker,
or underlinking of convenience libraries built from the same source.

[...]
make -f src/mlpack/methods/det/CMakeFiles/mlpack_det.dir/build.make 
src/mlpack/methods/det/CMakeFiles/mlpack_det.dir/build
make[4]: Entering directory '/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu'
[ 27%] Building CXX object 
src/mlpack/methods/det/CMakeFiles/mlpack_det.dir/det_main.cpp.o
cd /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/mlpack/methods/det && /usr/bin/c++ 
 -DARMA_NO_DEBUG -DBOOST_TEST_DYN_LINK -DHAS_OPENMP -DNDEBUG 
-I/<>/src -I/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/mlpack/..  
-g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat 
-Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wall -Wextra 
-ftemplate-depth=1000 -O3 -fopenmp   -DBINDING_TYPE=BINDING_TYPE_CLI 
-std=gnu++11 -o CMakeFiles/mlpack_det.dir/det_main.cpp.o -c 
/<>/src/mlpack/methods/det/det_main.cpp
In file included from /<>/src/mlpack/methods/det/dt_utils.hpp:147,
 from /<>/src/mlpack/methods/det/det_main.cpp:15:
/<>/src/mlpack/methods/det/dt_utils_impl.hpp: In function 
'mlpack::det::DTree* mlpack::det::Trainer(MatType&, size_t, 
bool, size_t, size_t, bool) [with MatType = arma::Mat; TagType = int]':
/<>/src/mlpack/methods/det/dt_utils_impl.hpp:189:3: error: 'folds' 
not specified in enclosing 'parallel'
  189 |   for (omp_size_t fold = 0; fold < (omp_size_t) folds; fold++)
  |   ^~~
/<>/src/mlpack/methods/det/dt_utils_impl.hpp:187:11: error: 
enclosing 'parallel'
  187 |   #pragma omp parallel for default(none) \
  |   ^~~
/<>/src/mlpack/methods/det/dt_utils_impl.hpp:192:33: error: 
'testSize' not specified in enclosing 'parallel'
  192 | const size_t start = fold * testSize;
  | ^~~~
/<>/src/mlpack/methods/det/dt_utils_impl.hpp:187:11: error: 
enclosing 'parallel'
  187 |   #pragma omp parallel for default(none) \
  |   ^~~
/<>/src/mlpack/methods/det/dt_utils_impl.hpp:194:61: error: 
'cvData' not specified in enclosing 'parallel'
  194 | * testSize, (size_t) cvData.n_cols);
  |  ~~~^~
/<>/src/mlpack/methods/det/dt_utils_impl.hpp:187:11: error: 
enclosing 'parallel'
  187 |   #pragma omp parallel for default(none) \
  |   ^~~
/<>/src/mlpack/methods/det/dt_utils_impl.hpp:222:5: error: 
'minLeafSize' not specified in enclosing 'parallel'
  222 | cvDTree.Grow(train, cvOldFromNew, useVolumeReg, maxLeafSize,
  | ^~~
/<>/src/mlpack/methods/det/dt_utils_impl.hpp:187:11: error: 
enclosing 'parallel'
  187 |   #pragma omp parallel for default(none) \
  |   ^~~
/<>/src/mlpack/methods/det/dt_utils_impl.hpp:222:5: error: 
'maxLeafSize' not specified in enclosing 'parallel'
  222 | cvDTree.Grow(train, 

Bug#825847: marked as done (python3-pandas-lib: Regression - NotImplementedError: parse_dates keyword of read_excel is not implemented)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 27 Sep 2019 22:45:06 +0100
with message-id <98546502-637c-c1b2-5374-e87fa3878...@zoho.com>
and subject line Fixed by upstream
has caused the Debian Bug report #825847,
regarding python3-pandas-lib: Regression - NotImplementedError: parse_dates 
keyword of read_excel is not implemented
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
825847: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825847
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python3-pandas-lib
Version: 0.18.0+git114-g6c692ae-1
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***

In python3-pandas{-lib} version 0.18.0+git114-g6c692ae-1 (as is in testing
currently), I get the following error:

NotImplementedError: parse_dates keyword of read_excel is not implemented

When I downgrade to version 0.17.1-3 (which was in testing previously), it
works fine.

This is upstream issue https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/12683.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.5.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages python3-pandas-lib depends on:
ii  libc6   2.22-9
ii  libgcc1 1:6.1.1-4
ii  libstdc++6  6.1.1-4
ii  python3 3.5.1-3
ii  python3-numpy [python3-numpy-abi9]  1:1.11.0-1

python3-pandas-lib recommends no packages.

python3-pandas-lib suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

Version: 0.20.3-1

(actually 0.20.1 but we never had that)

See linked upstream bug for details.--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#935343: eficas: Qt4 removal from Bullseye

[Moritz Mühlenhoff]

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 11:25:56PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 11:00:10PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> > Source: eficas
> > Version: 6.4.0-1-2
> > Severity: important
> > User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: qt4-removal
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > As you might know, we the Qt/KDE team are going to remove Qt 4 in Bullseye
> > cycle, as announced in [1].
> > 
> > In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on
> > the Qt4 libraries have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed
> > from the Debian repositories.
> > 
> > Your package still uses Qt 4, via the Python bindings (PyQt4).
> > 
> > Therefore, please take the time and:
> > 
> > - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt 5 /
> >   PyQt5 port of your application;
> > - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there 
> > are
> >   suitable alternatives for your users;
> > - if there is a Qt 5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it;
> > - if both the Qt 4 and the Qt 5 versions already coexist in the Debian
> >   archives, consider removing the Qt 4 version.
> 
> Per https://www.code-aster.org/forum2/viewtopic.php?id=22738 is obsolete
> and won't get ported.
> 
> Is this accurate? Does anyone of the maintainers intend to port it themselves?
> Otherwise let's remove it as we're moving forward with the Qt4 removal now.

I've now filed a removal bug.

Cheers,
Moritz 

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processing of ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2.dsc
  ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2.debian.tar.xz
  ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:12:03 +0200
Source: ros-rosdep
Architecture: source
Version: 0.16.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers 

Changed-By: Jochen Sprickerhof 
Closes: 938395
Changes:
 ros-rosdep (0.16.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * remove cruft in d/watch
   * Drop Python 2 (Closes: #938395)
   * Add d/clean
   * Install default sources.list
Checksums-Sha1:
 65542d334d8f3977453e135f4962f30d248d079f 2202 ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2.dsc
 29a26e6a8816c86a7c57e873d5466a92f951f19a 4672 ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 3b4b0e389b3844e7dc96489c4bc3cb0ede9642e6 6803 
ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 2fccac62bcac403e3861f7af6bee853a2c58b6b9d479b9f9d175ad2a444c6dec 2202 
ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2.dsc
 25e71348eaddcff823e06a1f367181a940290db4446720b61d144de688cb844c 4672 
ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 2afa47b1675350a012ee6d41a46cc150621afaa8ff418485332f60466c4578c7 6803 
ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 c32fef5a0aa11e66064ab538f739f971 2202 python optional ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2.dsc
 81eee2253ea69de75f03e3e991c27276 4672 python optional 
ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 f7914ef578e53b9470cd1915299e5d25 6803 python optional 
ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEc7KZy9TurdzAF+h6W//cwljmlDMFAl2N7r4ACgkQW//cwljm
lDNxmRAAmCQ3ny8pnXDu+WPOSpEn4+RGDjYOZBMrSA29c/ICL8G/YifsSYn0AFn/
JNMeBK+Yfj2qDHCMBdZzK4siFJ0sog+NEzC1wbJD+NQ3MQYlNloA1Dvjqpx7Fhr3
VMQVxjvl+3sDBfM9Q+0VtSqpgk9aM99GKIDoSte5TPu9LKNtcgQlGokznMd27MHb
ep5mRh8HY1/RkENoSE5l/Snok4BGGY29moptCwnDSLXr53sT9qICRvA8gicWlkrG
kW4YAXJDDBy6YUTDW9rJEHDLC7U+5Sm7iKqyNrNFWumyTlIo1U2PIAchI0pU/ZqU
r3Cy9Mm9MvG4HRI2IB84LK9v08FiwpFqYbXvn+gfgCJbU6Tr5WhyCJs1Bx8PjZot
/aOSp5LiChldkDEcfOHknX2pHb1TV4OgSrpV42aolVcSyBMmQQCZtCgo6ESACQZ5
9rnV+iZuexNOO5fGRScnUTy5YrEhqaWByd3ekfgLhJB7Va7F9bIO6Q5LbKDaFdO8
HesdDoe0jyXzKcaAd/0aTkuub7ay2UTI0GueLs0OEiy0lZ/jXjrdnk54WJDH8Gs1
rUWtRkKceWdeEO19qzVixM6EbcxmCrUbTwaFYpH2Z2JP2CeVxDrAofCARmkTTUGC
VbE3pDePwQ8oGmSxb2sENsZBD4+9CZD9/UXscb0l1OZSFYpDakU=
=Y90/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#941259: e-antic FTBFS on alpha due to enforced absence of libflint-dev

[Michael Cree]

Source: e-antic
Version: 0.1.3+ds-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs

e-antic FTBFS on alpha during the configure stage with [1]:

checking flint/flint.h usability... no
checking flint/flint.h presence... no
checking for flint/flint.h... no
configure: error: flint header not found

flint has now been built on Alpha so debian/control can be updated to
build-depend on libflint-dev on Alpha.  Also openmp functions on Alpha
so the disabling of openmp is not necessary in debian/rules.  I attach
a patch that attends to both of these matters.  With the patch e-antic
builds to completion on Alpha.

Cheers,
Michael.

[1] 
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=e-antic=alpha=0.1.3%2Bds-2=1565125004=0
diff -urp e-antic-0.1.3+ds/debian/control e-antic-0.1.3+ds_new/debian/control
--- e-antic-0.1.3+ds/debian/control	2019-07-12 03:35:23.0 +1200
+++ e-antic-0.1.3+ds_new/debian/control	2019-09-27 20:16:42.117758125 +1200
@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ Build-Depends:
  autoconf-archive, gnulib,
  libgmp-dev,
  libmpfr-dev,
- libflint-dev [!alpha !m68k !sh4 !x32],
- libflint-arb-dev [!alpha !m68k !sh4 !x32]
+ libflint-dev [!m68k !sh4 !x32],
+ libflint-arb-dev [!m68k !sh4 !x32]
 Standards-Version: 4.4.0
 Homepage: https://github.com/videlec/e-antic/
 Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/e-antic.git
diff -urp e-antic-0.1.3+ds/debian/rules e-antic-0.1.3+ds_new/debian/rules
--- e-antic-0.1.3+ds/debian/rules	2019-06-21 05:20:36.0 +1200
+++ e-antic-0.1.3+ds_new/debian/rules	2019-09-27 20:47:57.992018094 +1200
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ export ACLOCAL_PATH=/usr/share/gnulib/m4
 
 DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)
 
-ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH), alpha-linux-gnu mipsel-linux-gnu))
+ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH), mipsel-linux-gnu))
 DEB_PKG_EANTIC_OPENMP=no
 else
 DEB_PKG_EANTIC_OPENMP=yes
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#935927: Suggests instead of comment of Python2 only packages? (Was: debian-science: migrate all python dependencies to their python3 variant)

[Andreas Tille]

Hi Sandro,

thanks a lot for your fixes to the Debian Science metapackages.

Regarding your change:

Switch every python dependency to Python3 (removing packages no longer
available, commenting out python2-only packages); Closes: #935927

I'm wondering whether it would not be better to rather

Suggests: python2-only

packages.  If the packages are commented out they become absolutely
invisible while per policy suggested packages do not need to exist and
thus the metapackages would not block a removal of the packages
themselves.

Since you felt a need to change this in Git I guess you are interested
in a soonish upload.  So if we have some consensus about the item above
I'll upload to get the changes applied.

Kind regards and thanks again

   Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#938395: marked as done (ros-rosdep: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:35:34 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#938395: fixed in ros-rosdep 0.16.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #938395,
regarding ros-rosdep: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
938395: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938395
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:ros-rosdep
Version: 0.15.2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2removal

Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html

Your package either build-depends, depends on Python2, or uses Python2
in the autopkg tests.  Please stop using Python2, and fix this issue
by one of the following actions.

- Convert your Package to Python3. This is the preferred option.  In
  case you are providing a Python module foo, please consider dropping
  the python-foo package, and only build a python3-foo package.  Please
  don't drop Python2 modules, which still have reverse dependencies,
  just document them.
  
  This is the preferred option.

- If the package is dead upstream, cannot be converted or maintained
  in Debian, it should be removed from the distribution.  If the
  package still has reverse dependencies, raise the severity to
  "serious" and document the reverse dependencies with the BTS affects
  command.  If the package has no reverse dependencies, confirm that
  the package can be removed, reassign this issue to ftp.debian.org,
  make sure that the bug priority is set to normal and retitle the
  issue to "RM: PKG -- removal triggered by the Python2 removal".

- If the package has still many users (popcon >= 300), or is needed to
  build another package which cannot be removed, document that by
  adding the "py2keep" user tag (not replacing the py2remove tag),
  using the debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org user.  Also any
  dependencies on an unversioned python package (python, python-dev)
  must not be used, same with the python shebang.  These have to be
  replaced by python2/python2.7 dependencies and shebang.

  This is the least preferred option.

If the conversion or removal needs action on another package first,
please document the blocking by using the BTS affects command, like

  affects  + src:ros-rosdep

If there is no py2removal bug for that reverse-dependency, please file
a bug on this package (similar to this bug report).

If there are questions, please refer to the wiki page for the removal:
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal, or ask for help on IRC
#debian-python, or the debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org mailing list.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ros-rosdep
Source-Version: 0.16.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ros-rosdep, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 938...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jochen Sprickerhof  (supplier of updated ros-rosdep 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:12:03 +0200
Source: ros-rosdep
Architecture: source
Version: 0.16.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers 

Changed-By: Jochen Sprickerhof 
Closes: 938395
Changes:
 ros-rosdep (0.16.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * remove cruft in d/watch
   * Drop Python 2 (Closes: #938395)
   * Add d/clean
   * Install default sources.list
Checksums-Sha1:
 65542d334d8f3977453e135f4962f30d248d079f 2202 ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2.dsc
 29a26e6a8816c86a7c57e873d5466a92f951f19a 4672 ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 3b4b0e389b3844e7dc96489c4bc3cb0ede9642e6 6803 
ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 2fccac62bcac403e3861f7af6bee853a2c58b6b9d479b9f9d175ad2a444c6dec 2202 
ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2.dsc
 25e71348eaddcff823e06a1f367181a940290db4446720b61d144de688cb844c 4672 
ros-rosdep_0.16.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 2afa47b1675350a012ee6d41a46cc150621afaa8ff418485332f60466c4578c7 6803 

Processing of ros-rospack_2.5.3-2_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

ros-rospack_2.5.3-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ros-rospack_2.5.3-2.dsc
  ros-rospack_2.5.3-2.debian.tar.xz
  ros-rospack_2.5.3-2_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

ros-rospack_2.5.3-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:35:16 +0200
Source: ros-rospack
Architecture: source
Version: 2.5.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers 

Changed-By: Jochen Sprickerhof 
Closes: 938399
Changes:
 ros-rospack (2.5.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Move to Python 3 (Closes: #938399)
Checksums-Sha1:
 38f12a4399fc7b144bae77cf8685a62ea6792651 2337 ros-rospack_2.5.3-2.dsc
 6523328e2b1997f09a8c9f66bcf42d8bc5c3e0da 5828 ros-rospack_2.5.3-2.debian.tar.xz
 d4467ebb0760e34b65239430afe96621f0b8735b 8535 
ros-rospack_2.5.3-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 0208ebd656c24279d46881a601374779b86db33524959f30842d206cefed1dc1 2337 
ros-rospack_2.5.3-2.dsc
 7d9b83b418539d3dc78e00eb5053e34bca64f74b027631ccbdf7bfae17530a10 5828 
ros-rospack_2.5.3-2.debian.tar.xz
 a49b428d616dbaf45e5632a81d178ba82da651f501a4870fea7660cd2a23d81b 8535 
ros-rospack_2.5.3-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 235d93b67d2c841ba66b55628eabbb1b 2337 libs optional ros-rospack_2.5.3-2.dsc
 ac3b77227cd1878ad5ca906b5e855db5 5828 libs optional 
ros-rospack_2.5.3-2.debian.tar.xz
 ea9a7850636ba4af41af86ccc93f9f0b 8535 libs optional 
ros-rospack_2.5.3-2_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=fP8f
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#938399: marked as done (ros-rospack: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:04:38 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#938399: fixed in ros-rospack 2.5.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #938399,
regarding ros-rospack: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
938399: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938399
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:ros-rospack
Version: 2.5.3-1
Severity: normal
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2removal

Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html

Your package either build-depends, depends on Python2, or uses Python2
in the autopkg tests.  Please stop using Python2, and fix this issue
by one of the following actions.

- Convert your Package to Python3. This is the preferred option.  In
  case you are providing a Python module foo, please consider dropping
  the python-foo package, and only build a python3-foo package.  Please
  don't drop Python2 modules, which still have reverse dependencies,
  just document them.
  
  This is the preferred option.

- If the package is dead upstream, cannot be converted or maintained
  in Debian, it should be removed from the distribution.  If the
  package still has reverse dependencies, raise the severity to
  "serious" and document the reverse dependencies with the BTS affects
  command.  If the package has no reverse dependencies, confirm that
  the package can be removed, reassign this issue to ftp.debian.org,
  make sure that the bug priority is set to normal and retitle the
  issue to "RM: PKG -- removal triggered by the Python2 removal".

- If the package has still many users (popcon >= 300), or is needed to
  build another package which cannot be removed, document that by
  adding the "py2keep" user tag (not replacing the py2remove tag),
  using the debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org user.  Also any
  dependencies on an unversioned python package (python, python-dev)
  must not be used, same with the python shebang.  These have to be
  replaced by python2/python2.7 dependencies and shebang.

  This is the least preferred option.

If the conversion or removal needs action on another package first,
please document the blocking by using the BTS affects command, like

  affects  + src:ros-rospack

If there is no py2removal bug for that reverse-dependency, please file
a bug on this package (similar to this bug report).

If there are questions, please refer to the wiki page for the removal:
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal, or ask for help on IRC
#debian-python, or the debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org mailing list.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ros-rospack
Source-Version: 2.5.3-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ros-rospack, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 938...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jochen Sprickerhof  (supplier of updated ros-rospack 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:35:16 +0200
Source: ros-rospack
Architecture: source
Version: 2.5.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers 

Changed-By: Jochen Sprickerhof 
Closes: 938399
Changes:
 ros-rospack (2.5.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Move to Python 3 (Closes: #938399)
Checksums-Sha1:
 38f12a4399fc7b144bae77cf8685a62ea6792651 2337 ros-rospack_2.5.3-2.dsc
 6523328e2b1997f09a8c9f66bcf42d8bc5c3e0da 5828 ros-rospack_2.5.3-2.debian.tar.xz
 d4467ebb0760e34b65239430afe96621f0b8735b 8535 
ros-rospack_2.5.3-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 0208ebd656c24279d46881a601374779b86db33524959f30842d206cefed1dc1 2337 
ros-rospack_2.5.3-2.dsc
 7d9b83b418539d3dc78e00eb5053e34bca64f74b027631ccbdf7bfae17530a10 5828 
ros-rospack_2.5.3-2.debian.tar.xz
 a49b428d616dbaf45e5632a81d178ba82da651f501a4870fea7660cd2a23d81b 8535 
ros-rospack_2.5.3-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 235d93b67d2c841ba66b55628eabbb1b 2337 libs 

Processing of ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3.dsc
  ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3.debian.tar.xz
  ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:18:21 +0200
Source: ros-rosinstall
Architecture: source
Version: 0.7.8-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers 

Changed-By: Jochen Sprickerhof 
Closes: 938397
Changes:
 ros-rosinstall (0.7.8-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix ancient-python-version-field
   * Bump policy version (no changes)
   * switch to debhelper-compat and debhelper 12
   * add Salsa CI
   * Drop Python 2 (Closes: #938397)
   * Add d/clean
Checksums-Sha1:
 cb839edd966a35b77eddb571b626fe7b6fab61ec 2272 ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3.dsc
 a701b8724f051ef616f55716dc6f4418ead189fc 4504 
ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3.debian.tar.xz
 01b602dcfb928620d595a61bb767b51e601e3208 7874 
ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 9cd57365954279a8cad542f4fd7a836285d714e5102a6a4226ca17179ff950b8 2272 
ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3.dsc
 05411dbef9ccff284861618923e01fcd74a34c194af644816daff3a89fb5770f 4504 
ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3.debian.tar.xz
 3a70850a019db9ffa6a94bc30a1b19f98e531c76b8509279a099e2d140855084 7874 
ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3_source.buildinfo
Files:
 265eec1ecfc107751868e3dce32c5ebf 2272 python optional 
ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3.dsc
 19e778a7c279aab7f9852538d978fcc2 4504 python optional 
ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3.debian.tar.xz
 958f8ea7e70bcb5eb8aab0eab44d8824 7874 python optional 
ros-rosinstall_0.7.8-3_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=NUh2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#938321: marked as done (qtiplot: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:21:22 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#941285: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #938321,
regarding qtiplot: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
938321: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938321
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:qtiplot
Version: 0.9.8.9-18
Severity: normal
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2removal

Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html

Your package either build-depends, depends on Python2, or uses Python2
in the autopkg tests.  Please stop using Python2, and fix this issue
by one of the following actions.

- Convert your Package to Python3. This is the preferred option.  In
  case you are providing a Python module foo, please consider dropping
  the python-foo package, and only build a python3-foo package.  Please
  don't drop Python2 modules, which still have reverse dependencies,
  just document them.
  
  This is the preferred option.

- If the package is dead upstream, cannot be converted or maintained
  in Debian, it should be removed from the distribution.  If the
  package still has reverse dependencies, raise the severity to
  "serious" and document the reverse dependencies with the BTS affects
  command.  If the package has no reverse dependencies, confirm that
  the package can be removed, reassign this issue to ftp.debian.org,
  make sure that the bug priority is set to normal and retitle the
  issue to "RM: PKG -- removal triggered by the Python2 removal".

- If the package has still many users (popcon >= 300), or is needed to
  build another package which cannot be removed, document that by
  adding the "py2keep" user tag (not replacing the py2remove tag),
  using the debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org user.  Also any
  dependencies on an unversioned python package (python, python-dev)
  must not be used, same with the python shebang.  These have to be
  replaced by python2/python2.7 dependencies and shebang.

  This is the least preferred option.

If the conversion or removal needs action on another package first,
please document the blocking by using the BTS affects command, like

  affects  + src:qtiplot

If there is no py2removal bug for that reverse-dependency, please file
a bug on this package (similar to this bug report).

If there are questions, please refer to the wiki page for the removal:
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal, or ask for help on IRC
#debian-python, or the debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org mailing list.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.8.9-18+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package qtiplot has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941285

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#914241: marked as done (qtiplot: Using scripts crashes qtiplot)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:21:22 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#941285: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #914241,
regarding qtiplot: Using scripts crashes qtiplot
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
914241: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914241
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qtiplot
Version: 0.9.8.9-17+b1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

when I try to use scripts written in python with qtiplot, the software
crashes with a segmentation fault. 

This bug is really annoying because it costs me quite much time to do
everything without scripts.

This bug seems to be similar or the same as #740146, which I reported
about 11 months ago and it is still not fixed in the version from
yesterday.

Maybe this time someone reads it and takes action...

Günter Frenz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.18.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=de:en_US (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages qtiplot depends on:
ii  libalglib3.11  3.11.0-3
ii  libboost-system1.67.0  1.67.0-10
ii  libc6  2.27-8
ii  libgcc11:8.2.0-9
ii  libgl1 1.1.0-1
ii  libgl2ps1.41.4.0+dfsg1-2
ii  libglu1-mesa [libglu1] 9.0.0-2.1
ii  libgsl23   2.5+dfsg-5
ii  libgslcblas0   2.5+dfsg-5
ii  libmuparser2v5 2.2.3-6
ii  liborigin2-1v5 2:20110117-2
ii  libpng16-161.6.34-2
ii  libpython2.7   2.7.15-4
ii  libqt4-network 4:4.8.7+dfsg-17
ii  libqt4-opengl  4:4.8.7+dfsg-17
ii  libqt4-qt3support  4:4.8.7+dfsg-17
ii  libqt4-svg 4:4.8.7+dfsg-17
ii  libqt4-xml 4:4.8.7+dfsg-17
ii  libqtassistantclient4  4.6.3-7+b1
ii  libqtcore4 4:4.8.7+dfsg-17
ii  libqtexengine1 0.3-3
ii  libqtgui4  4:4.8.7+dfsg-17
ii  libstdc++6 8.2.0-9
ii  libtamuanova-0.2   0.2-4+b1
ii  python 2.7.15-3
ii  python-sip [sip-api-12.5]  4.19.13+dfsg-1
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.11.dfsg-1

Versions of packages qtiplot recommends:
pn  qt-assistant-compat  
ii  qtiplot-doc  0.9.8.9-17

qtiplot suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
---
Günter Frenz
Börschgasse 16a, D-51143 Köln
(h) gu...@guefz.de, gu...@freenet.de
(w) f...@gso-koeln.de
---




pgpPHrUoeisXv.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.8.9-18+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package qtiplot has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941285

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#642082: marked as done (qtiplot: failed to open opj files)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:21:22 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#941285: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #642082,
regarding qtiplot: failed to open opj files
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
642082: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642082
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qtiplot
Version: 0.9.8.4-2
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

Trying to open opj files in qtiplot is not possible.
It gives an error message explaining that this operation requires to use
Qtiplot pro version...

Not being able to open opj files makes Qtiplot completly useless!




-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages qtiplot depends on:
ii  libalglib-2.6.0   2.6.0-3 
ii  libc6 2.13-18 
ii  libgcc1   1:4.6.1-4   
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]  7.11-5  
ii  libgl2ps0 1.3.6-1 
ii  libglu1-mesa [libglu1]7.11-5  
ii  libgsl0ldbl   1.15+dfsg-1 
ii  libmuparser0debian1   1.34-2  
ii  liborigin2-1  2:20110117-1+b1 
ii  libpng12-01.2.46-3
ii  libpython2.6  2.6.7-3 
ii  libqt4-network4:4.7.3-5   
ii  libqt4-opengl 4:4.7.3-5   
ii  libqt4-qt3support 4:4.7.3-5   
ii  libqt4-svg4:4.7.3-5   
ii  libqt4-xml4:4.7.3-5   
ii  libqtassistantclient4 4.6.3-3 
ii  libqtcore44:4.7.3-5   
ii  libqtexengine10.3-2   
ii  libqtgui4 4:4.7.3-5   
ii  libstdc++64.6.1-4 
ii  libtamuanova-0.2  0.2-1   
ii  python2.6.7-3 
ii  python-qt44.8.3-4 
ii  python-sip4.12.4-1
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.3.4.dfsg-3

Versions of packages qtiplot recommends:
ii  qt-assistant-compat  4.6.3-3

qtiplot suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.8.9-18+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package qtiplot has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941285

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#882367: marked as done (Included help for function expression entry contains an error)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:21:22 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#941285: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #882367,
regarding Included help for function expression entry contains an error
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
882367: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882367
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qtiplot
Version: 0.9.8.9-16 

QtiPlot contains documentation for the available functions within the muparser 
package.
It appears when a column value is set (column header context menu "Set column 
values"
and choosing the log function from the drop down menu).

However, the documentation for the log function is wrong.  At least current 
versions
of muparser [1] specify it as the natural logarithm, not the decimal logarithm.

I tested the expression log(10) with Buster's version of muparser and it 
evaluates
to log_e(10)\approx2.3, not log_{10}(10.0)=1.0.

I tried to modify all translations accordingly.

[1] 
http://beltoforion.de/article.php?a=muparser=en=features=idDef2#idDef2
Only in qtiplot-0.9.8.9-working: debian
diff -r -u qtiplot-0.9.8.9/qtiplot/src/scripting/muParserScripting.cpp 
qtiplot-0.9.8.9-working/qtiplot/src/scripting/muParserScripting.cpp
--- qtiplot-0.9.8.9/qtiplot/src/scripting/muParserScripting.cpp 2012-11-07 
17:11:32.0 +0100
+++ qtiplot-0.9.8.9-working/qtiplot/src/scripting/muParserScripting.cpp 
2017-11-21 20:19:03.616750339 +0100
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
   { "invf", 3, NULL, NULL, invf, QObject::tr("invf(x, m, n):\n Inverse 
F-Distribution with m and n degrees of freedom.") },
   { "invt", 2, NULL, invt, NULL, QObject::tr("invt(x, n):\n Inverse 
t-distribution with n degrees of freedom.") },
   { "ln", 1, NULL,NULL,NULL, QObject::tr("ln(x):\n Calculate natural logarithm 
log_e.") },
-  { "log", 1, NULL,NULL,NULL, QObject::tr("log(x):\n Calculate decimal 
logarithm log_10.") },
+  { "log", 1, NULL,NULL,NULL, QObject::tr("log(x):\n Calculate natural 
logarithm log_e.") },
   { "log10", 1, NULL,NULL,NULL, QObject::tr("log10(x):\n Calculate decimal 
logarithm log_10.") },
   { "log2", 1, NULL,NULL,NULL, QObject::tr("log2(x):\n Calculate binary 
logarithm log_2.") },
   { "min", -1, NULL,NULL,NULL, QObject::tr("min(x,y,...):\n Calculate minimum 
of all arguments.") },
Only in qtiplot-0.9.8.9-working/qtiplot/src: TAGS
diff -r -u qtiplot-0.9.8.9/qtiplot/translations/qtiplot_cn.ts 
qtiplot-0.9.8.9-working/qtiplot/translations/qtiplot_cn.ts
--- qtiplot-0.9.8.9/qtiplot/translations/qtiplot_cn.ts  2012-11-07 
17:11:32.0 +0100
+++ qtiplot-0.9.8.9-working/qtiplot/translations/qtiplot_cn.ts  2017-11-21 
20:59:20.073507619 +0100
@@ -21502,9 +21502,9 @@
 
 
 log(x):
- Calculate decimal logarithm log_10.
+ Calculate natural logarithm log_e.
 log(x):
- 计算以10为底的对数。
+ 计算自然对数（以e为底的对数）。
 
 
 
diff -r -u qtiplot-0.9.8.9/qtiplot/translations/qtiplot_cz.ts 
qtiplot-0.9.8.9-working/qtiplot/translations/qtiplot_cz.ts
--- qtiplot-0.9.8.9/qtiplot/translations/qtiplot_cz.ts  2012-11-07 
17:11:32.0 +0100
+++ qtiplot-0.9.8.9-working/qtiplot/translations/qtiplot_cz.ts  2017-11-21 
21:01:00.890178064 +0100
@@ -13069,9 +13069,9 @@
 
 
 log(x):
- Calculate decimal logarithm log_10.
+ Calculate natural logarithm log_e.
 log(x):
- Počítá desetinný logaritmus log_10.
+ Počítá přirozený logaritmus log_e
 
 
 exp(x):
diff -r -u qtiplot-0.9.8.9/qtiplot/translations/qtiplot_de.ts 
qtiplot-0.9.8.9-working/qtiplot/translations/qtiplot_de.ts
--- qtiplot-0.9.8.9/qtiplot/translations/qtiplot_de.ts  2012-11-07 
17:11:32.0 +0100
+++ qtiplot-0.9.8.9-working/qtiplot/translations/qtiplot_de.ts  2017-11-21 
21:04:07.666851735 +0100
@@ -22246,9 +22246,9 @@
 
 
 log(x):
- Calculate decimal logarithm log_10.
+ Calculate natural logarithm log_e.
 log(x):
- Zehnerlogarithmus log_10.
+ Natürlicher Logarithmus log_e.
 
 
 log10(x):
diff -r -u qtiplot-0.9.8.9/qtiplot/translations/qtiplot_el.ts 
qtiplot-0.9.8.9-working/qtiplot/translations/qtiplot_el.ts
--- qtiplot-0.9.8.9/qtiplot/translations/qtiplot_el.ts  2012-11-07 
17:11:32.0 +0100
+++ qtiplot-0.9.8.9-working/qtiplot/translations/qtiplot_el.ts  2017-11-21 
21:04:44.620186454 +0100
@@ -12944,9 +12944,9 @@
 
 
 log(x):
- Calculate decimal logarithm log_10.
+ Calculate natural logarithm log_e.
 log(x):
-Υπολογισμός δεκαδικού λογάριθμου log_10.
+Υπολογισμός φυσικού λογάριθμου log_e.
 

Bug#681535: marked as done ([qtiplot] qtiplot crahes on startup with siplib error message)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:21:22 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#941285: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #681535,
regarding [qtiplot] qtiplot crahes on startup with siplib error message
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
681535: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681535
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: qtiplot
Version: 0.9.8.8-5+b1
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

qtiplot crashes with the following error message during startup:

qtiplot: 
/build/buildd-sip4_4.13.3-2-amd64-4XEr_m/sip4-4.13.3/siplib/siplib.c:10965: 
sipEnumType_alloc: Zusicherung »(((currentType)->td_flags & 0x0007) == 
0x0003)« nicht erfüllt.


I tested qtiplot versions 0.9.8.8-5+b1 and 0.9.8.8-2 with different 
combinations of  python-sip (4.13.3-2 and 4.12.3-1), all with the same 
result.
The much older qtiplot 0.9.8.4.2 does not start due to incompatibilities 
with the installed python version.



Timo


--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64

Debian Release: wheezy/sid
500 testing snapshot.debian.org
500 testing ftp.utexas.edu
500 testing ftp.debian-multimedia.org
500 testing debian.rub.de

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
-+-===
libalglib-2.6.0 (>= 2.6.0) | 2.6.0-6
libc6 (>= 2.4) | 2.13-33
libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1) | 1:4.7.1-2
libgl1-mesa-glx | 8.0.3-1
OR libgl1 |
libgl2ps0 | 1.3.6-1
libglu1-mesa | 8.0.3-1
OR libglu1 |
libgsl0ldbl (>= 1.9) | 1.15+dfsg-1
libmuparser2 (>= 2.1.0) | 2.1.0-3
liborigin2-1 | 2:20110117-1+b2
libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.13-4) | 1.2.49-1
libpython2.7 (>= 2.7) | 2.7.3~rc2-2.1
libqt4-network (>= 4:4.5.3) | 4:4.8.2-1
libqt4-opengl (>= 4:4.5.3) | 4:4.8.2-1
libqt4-qt3support (>= 4:4.5.3) | 4:4.8.2-1
libqt4-svg (>= 4:4.5.3) | 4:4.8.2-1
libqt4-xml (>= 4:4.5.3) | 4:4.8.2-1
libqtassistantclient4 (>= 4.6.3) | 4.6.3-4
libqtcore4 (>= 4:4.7.0~beta1) | 4:4.8.2-1
libqtexengine1 (>= 0.3) | 0.3-3
libqtgui4 (>= 4:4.6.1) | 4:4.8.2-1
libstdc++6 (>= 4.6) | 4.7.1-2
libtamuanova-0.2 (>= 0.2) | 0.2-2
zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4) | 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13
python-qt4 | 4.9.1-5
python-sip (>= 4.9-1) | 4.13.3-2
python (>= 2.6.6-7~) | 2.7.3~rc2-1


Recommends (Version) | Installed
==-+-===
qt-assistant-compat | 4.6.3-4
qtiplot-doc | 0.9.8.8-5


Package's Suggests field is empty.








--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.8.9-18+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package qtiplot has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941285

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#935343: marked as done (eficas: Qt4 removal from Bullseye)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:21:52 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#941288: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #935343,
regarding eficas: Qt4 removal from Bullseye
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
935343: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=935343
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: eficas
Version: 6.4.0-1-2
Severity: important
User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qt4-removal

Hi!

As you might know, we the Qt/KDE team are going to remove Qt 4 in Bullseye
cycle, as announced in [1].

In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on
the Qt4 libraries have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get removed
from the Debian repositories.

Your package still uses Qt 4, via the Python bindings (PyQt4).

Therefore, please take the time and:

- contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt 5 /
  PyQt5 port of your application;
- if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are
  suitable alternatives for your users;
- if there is a Qt 5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it;
- if both the Qt 4 and the Qt 5 versions already coexist in the Debian
  archives, consider removing the Qt 4 version.

Porting from Qt 4 to 5 is much easier than it was to port from Qt 3 to 4.
Please see [2] for the general porting instructions, and [3] for some
Python-specific differences.

The removal is being tracked in [4]. My intention is to bump the severity
of this bug to RC soon, like it is already the case with other Qt 4 removal
bugs.

[1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/08/msg6.html
[2]: https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html
[3]: https://www.riverbankcomputing.com/static/Docs/PyQt5/pyqt4_differences.html
[4]: https://wiki.debian.org/Qt4Removal

--
Dmitry Shachnev


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6.4.0-1-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package eficas has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941288

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#741626: marked as done (qtiplot: Fits processed under Fit Wizard give wrong results)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:21:22 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#941285: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #741626,
regarding qtiplot: Fits processed under Fit Wizard give wrong results
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
741626: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=741626
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: qtiplot
Version: 0.9.8.8-5+b1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

starting from Wheezy, qtiplot gives wrong fit results when using the
Fit Wizard.

Here is my dataset (which I use to test qtiplot since 2007):

   x_iy_is_is_i: error of y_i (standard deviation)
   --
   0.68   3.92   0.41
   1.81   6.80   0.67
   2.57  10.24   0.80
   3.41  12.15   0.92
   4.85  16.02   1.10
   5.76  19.94   1.20
   6.90  21.83   1.31
   7.84  26.61   1.39
  ---

Go for a (linear) maximum likelihood fit

   y = a*x + b

The correct results, following well-known rules, are

   a = 3.055892 +/- 0.129601
   b = 1.770606 +/- 0.410934

   chi^2 / doF = 2.694952 / 6.00 = 0.449159

These results were produced by qtiplot as well (always using
"instumental weighting") -- up to Squeeze (qtiplot-0.9.8-1).

In Wheezy (qtiplot-0.9.8.8-5+b1), using the Fit Wizard, I obtain

   a = 3.1003594093891e+00 +/- 1.8592231846202e-01
   b = 1.5497365804245e+00 +/- 7.7928406686591e-01
   Chi^2/doF = 4.3061339571571e-01

which is pretty much off the correct values.

This is reproducably so, whenever the Fit Wizard is used, no matter
whether the "Built-in" linear function is chosen or a "User defined"
function of the same form (and "Instrumental Weighting" in all cases).

It should be noted that the correct result is still obtained with the
"Fit Linear" option selected directly in then "Analysis" menu (without 
recourse the the Fit Wizard).


Exactly the same thing happens in Ubuntu-12.04 (which has the same qtiplot
version as Wheezy).

The Fit Wizard is crucial, however, for fit functions beyond the set
of Built-ins and for a precise control of the fit procedure, especially in
the non-linear case.
And a program for scientific data analysis should not produce wrong results,
of course.
Hence the severity of "important".

It looks like a degression within the Fit Wizard, not the fit code itself.
Any idea or workaround?

A fix would be highly appreciated.
If you need more info or help in testing, please let me know.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.4
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.6.11-X86_64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages qtiplot depends on:
ii  libalglib-2.6.0   2.6.0-6
ii  libc6 2.13-38+deb7u1
ii  libgcc1   1:4.7.2-5
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]  8.0.5-4+deb7u2
ii  libgl2ps0 1.3.6-1
ii  libglu1-mesa [libglu1]8.0.5-4+deb7u2
ii  libgsl0ldbl   1.15+dfsg.2-2
ii  libmuparser2  2.1.0-3
ii  liborigin2-1  2:20110117-1+b2
ii  libpng12-01.2.49-1
ii  libpython2.7  2.7.3-6
ii  libqt4-network4:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii  libqt4-opengl 4:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii  libqt4-qt3support 4:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii  libqt4-svg4:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii  libqt4-xml4:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii  libqtassistantclient4 4.6.3-4
ii  libqtcore44:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii  libqtexengine10.3-3
ii  libqtgui4 4:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii  libstdc++64.7.2-5
ii  libtamuanova-0.2  0.2-2
ii  python2.7.3-4+deb7u1
ii  python-qt44.9.3-4
ii  python-sip4.13.3-2
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.7.dfsg-13

Versions of packages qtiplot recommends:
pn  qt-assistant-compat  
ii  qtiplot-doc  0.9.8.8-5

qtiplot suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Regards,
Burkhard Bunk.
--
 b...@physik.hu-berlin.de  Physics Institute, Humboldt University
 fax:++49-30 2093 7628 Newtonstr. 15
 phone:  ++49-30 2093 7980 12489 Berlin, Germany
--
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.8.9-18+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package qtiplot has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we 

Bug#816232: marked as done (eficas: please make the build reproducible)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:21:52 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#941288: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #816232,
regarding eficas: please make the build reproducible
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
816232: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816232
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: eficas
Version: 6.4.0-1-1.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: environment
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org

Hi!

While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that eficas could not be built reproducibly.
It uses the shell-builtin 'echo' which behaves differently depending on
the used shell.

The attached patch fixes this by using printf instead.

Regards,
 Reiner

[1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index 67b8cdb..8fdb109 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_ARGS_ALL += --no-compile \
 	--install-lib=/usr/share/pyshared
 
 build/eficas::
-	echo '#!/bin/sh\npython /usr/share/pyshared/Aster/qtEficas_aster.py $$*\n' > eficasQt
+	printf '#!/bin/sh\npython /usr/share/pyshared/Aster/qtEficas_aster.py $$*\n' > eficasQt
 	
 install/eficas::
 # Configuration


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6.4.0-1-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package eficas has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941288

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#655498: marked as done (eficas pollutes Python module namespace)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:21:52 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#941288: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #655498,
regarding eficas pollutes Python module namespace
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
655498: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=655498
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Source: eficas
Version: 2.0.3-1-1
Severity: normal

eficas ships a number of public Python modules with very generic names: 
Extensions, Misc, Tools, Validation, convert, generator etc.


Are these modules supposed to be used by anything that eficas itself? If 
no, then please move them into a private directory.


--
Jakub Wilk


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6.4.0-1-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package eficas has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941288

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#740146: marked as done (qtiplot: Qtiplot exits when scripting language changed to python)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:21:22 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#941285: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #740146,
regarding qtiplot: Qtiplot exits when scripting language changed to python
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
740146: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740146
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qtiplot
Version: 0.9.8.8-5+b1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

   * What led up to the situation? changed scripting language to python
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)? See above
   * What was the outcome of this action? Qtiplot crashed, error message was 
"qtiplot: 
/build/buildd-sip4_4.13.3-2-amd64-4XEr_m/sip4-4.13.3/siplib/siplib.c:10965: 
sipEnumType_alloc: 
Assertion `(((currentType)->td_flags & 0x0007) == 0x0003)' failed.
Aborted"

   * What outcome did you expect instead? Normal operation



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.4
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages qtiplot depends on:
ii  libalglib-2.6.0   2.6.0-6
ii  libc6 2.13-38+deb7u1
ii  libgcc1   1:4.7.2-5
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]  8.0.5-4+deb7u2
ii  libgl2ps0 1.3.6-1
ii  libglu1-mesa [libglu1]8.0.5-4+deb7u2
ii  libgsl0ldbl   1.15+dfsg.2-2
ii  libmuparser2  2.1.0-3
ii  liborigin2-1  2:20110117-1+b2
ii  libpng12-01.2.49-1
ii  libpython2.7  2.7.3-6
ii  libqt4-network4:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii  libqt4-opengl 4:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii  libqt4-qt3support 4:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii  libqt4-svg4:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii  libqt4-xml4:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii  libqtassistantclient4 4.6.3-4
ii  libqtcore44:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii  libqtexengine10.3-3
ii  libqtgui4 4:4.8.2+dfsg-11
ii  libstdc++64.7.2-5
ii  libtamuanova-0.2  0.2-2
ii  python2.7.3-4+deb7u1
ii  python-qt44.9.3-4
ii  python-sip4.13.3-2
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.7.dfsg-13

Versions of packages qtiplot recommends:
ii  qt-assistant-compat  4.6.3-4
ii  qtiplot-doc  0.9.8.8-5

qtiplot suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.8.9-18+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package qtiplot has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941285

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#549536: marked as done (qtiplot contains embedded code copies of zlib, liborigin, and added qwtplot3d in this version)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:21:22 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#941285: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #549536,
regarding qtiplot contains embedded code copies of zlib, liborigin, and added 
qwtplot3d in this version
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
549536: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549536
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qtiplot
Version: 0.9.7.8-1
Severity: important

Policy 4.13 pretty strongly suggests avoiding code copies.  This most recent
version goes the wrong direction and adds another code copy and drops use of
the package from the archive.  All three of these packages exist in Debian and
should be used instead of local copies.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers karmic-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'karmic-updates'), (500, 'karmic-security'), (500, 
'karmic-backports'), (500, 'karmic')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-11-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.8.9-18+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package qtiplot has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941285

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#549468: marked as done (qtiplot: Origin 6 and 8 compatibility issues)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:21:22 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#941285: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #549468,
regarding qtiplot: Origin 6 and 8 compatibility issues
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
549468: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549468
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qtiplot
Version: 0.9.7.8-1
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

I know that liborigin2, which is part of qtiplot 0.9.7.8, officially supports
Origin 7.5 formats at the moment only. However, I made some testing with
Origin projects created with Origin 6.0, 7.5 and 8.0. All projects contain
100 datapoints for X, ranging from 1 to 100, and the value of Sin(X) for
the Y column. I plotted the Y column in Origin and saved the project file.

The Origin project files can be found here:



The project created with Origin 7.5 can be imported into qtiplot without any
problems, as expected. For the Origin 8.0 project, qtiplot rejects the file
import, claiming that the version of the project file is unknown.

For the Origin 6.0 project file, however, the result is interesting. The
worksheet is imported correctly except for the fact, that the X column
is interpreted as Y as well, so one ends up with two Y columns and thus
plotting does not work. Once I set the affected column back to X, the
worksheet can be plotted properly. I presume this might be a smaller issue
only so that a small patch could enhance compatibilty with Origin 6.0

I will also create an identical project file with Origin 5.0 once I can
get hold of the Origin 5.0 install media and put the project files into
the location above.

Adrian


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages qtiplot depends on:
ii  libc6  2.9-25GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc11:4.4.1-4 GCC support library
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl 7.5.1-1   A free implementation of the OpenG
ii  libglu1-mesa [libglu1] 7.5.1-1   The OpenGL utility library (GLU)
ii  libgsl0ldbl1.13+dfsg-1   GNU Scientific Library (GSL) -- li
ii  libmuparser0   1.28-3fast mathematical expressions pars
ii  liborigin2-1   1:06042009-1  library for reading OriginLab Orig
ii  libpng12-0 1.2.39-1  PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt4-assistant   4:4.5.2-2 Qt 4 assistant module
ii  libqt4-network 4:4.5.2-2 Qt 4 network module
ii  libqt4-opengl  4:4.5.2-2 Qt 4 OpenGL module
ii  libqt4-qt3support  4:4.5.2-2 Qt 3 compatibility library for Qt 
ii  libqt4-svg 4:4.5.2-2 Qt 4 SVG module
ii  libqt4-xml 4:4.5.2-2 Qt 4 XML module
ii  libqtcore4 4:4.5.2-2 Qt 4 core module
ii  libqtgui4  4:4.5.2-2 Qt 4 GUI module
ii  libqwt5-qt45.2.0-1   Qt4 widgets library for technical 
ii  libstdc++6 4.4.1-4   The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  python-central 0.6.11register and build utility for Pyt
ii  python-qt4 4.4.4-6   Python bindings for Qt4
ii  python2.5  2.5.4-1   An interactive high-level object-o
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-15 compression library - runtime

qtiplot recommends no packages.

qtiplot suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.8.9-18+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package qtiplot has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941285

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 

Bug#875150: marked as done ([qtiplot] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:21:22 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#941285: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #875150,
regarding [qtiplot] Future Qt4 removal from Buster
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
875150: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875150
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: qtiplot
Version: 0.9.8.9-16
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qt4-removal


Hi! As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4
as [announced] in:

[announced] 


Currently Qt4 has been dead upstream and we are starting to have problems
maintaining it, like for example in the [OpenSSL 1.1 support] case.

[OpenSSL 1.1 support] 

In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on
the Qt4 libraries have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get
removed from the Debian repositories.

Therefore, please take the time and:
- contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5
port of your application
- if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are
suitable alternatives for your users
- if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it
- if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian
archives, consider removing the Qt4 version

= Porting =

Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we
know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less
painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4.

We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4.

Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever
you start porting your application.

[migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtbasedstuff.html
[apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html

For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE
team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org

The removal is being tracked in 

Lisandro,
on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.8.9-18+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package qtiplot has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941285

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#941288: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 6.4.0-1-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package eficas has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941288

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#875158: marked as done ([qtexengine] Future Qt4 removal from Buster)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:20:47 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#941286: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #875158,
regarding [qtexengine] Future Qt4 removal from Buster
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
875158: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=875158
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: qtexengine
Version: 0.3-3
Severity: wishlist
User: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qt4-removal


Hi! As you might know we the Qt/KDE team are preparing to remove Qt4
as [announced] in:

[announced] 


Currently Qt4 has been dead upstream and we are starting to have problems
maintaining it, like for example in the [OpenSSL 1.1 support] case.

[OpenSSL 1.1 support] 

In order to make this move, all packages directly or indirectly depending on
the Qt4 libraries have to either get ported to Qt5 or eventually get
removed from the Debian repositories.

Therefore, please take the time and:
- contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5
port of your application
- if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there are
suitable alternatives for your users
- if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it
- if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian
archives, consider removing the Qt4 version

= Porting =

Some of us where involved in various Qt4 to Qt5 migrations [migration] and we
know for sure that porting stuff from Qt4 to Qt5 is much much easier and less
painful than it was from Qt3 to Qt4.

We also understand that there is still a lot of software still using Qt4.

Don't forget to take a look at the C++ API changes page [apichanges] whenever
you start porting your application.

[migration] http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/packagingqtbasedstuff.html
[apichanges] http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/sourcebreaks.html

For any questions and issues, do not hesitate to contact the Debian Qt/KDE
team at debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org

The removal is being tracked in 

Lisandro,
on behalf of the Qt4 maintainers
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.3-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package qtexengine has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941286

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#664140: marked as done (qtiplot crashes if libqt3-mt is installed)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:21:22 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#941285: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #664140,
regarding qtiplot crashes if libqt3-mt is installed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
664140: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664140
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qtiplot
Version: 0.9.8.8-5
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these lines ***

The situation is activated by the instalation of libqt3-mt (as requested, for 
example, by lprof)

After libqt3-mt is installed runing qtiplot Analisys->Fit Wizard leads to a 
crash, it also oddly afects multi-peak fits.

Removing libqt3-mt gives back the correct behavior



-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_PT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_PT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages qtiplot depends on:
ii  libalglib-2.6.0   2.6.0-6
ii  libc6 2.13-27
ii  libgcc1   1:4.6.3-1
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1]  7.11.2-1
ii  libgl2ps0 1.3.6-1
ii  libglu1-mesa [libglu1]7.11.2-1
ii  libgsl0ldbl   1.15+dfsg-1
ii  libmuparser0debian1   1.34-2
ii  liborigin2-1  2:20110117-1+b1
ii  libpng12-01.2.47-1
ii  libpython2.7  2.7.2-8
ii  libqt4-network4:4.7.4-2
ii  libqt4-opengl 4:4.7.4-2
ii  libqt4-qt3support 4:4.7.4-2
ii  libqt4-svg4:4.7.4-2
ii  libqt4-xml4:4.7.4-2
ii  libqtassistantclient4 4.6.3-3
ii  libqtcore44:4.7.4-2
ii  libqtexengine10.3-3
ii  libqtgui4 4:4.7.4-2
ii  libstdc++64.6.3-1
ii  libtamuanova-0.2  0.2-2
ii  python2.7.2-10
ii  python-qt44.9.1-1
ii  python-sip4.13.2-1
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.6.dfsg-2

Versions of packages qtiplot recommends:
ii  qt-assistant-compat  4.6.3-3
ii  qtiplot-doc  0.9.8.8-3

qtiplot suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.8.9-18+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package qtiplot has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941285

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#936471: marked as done (eficas: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 28 Sep 2019 05:21:52 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#941288: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #936471,
regarding eficas: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
936471: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936471
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:eficas
Version: 6.4.0-1-2
Severity: normal
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2removal

Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html

Your package either build-depends, depends on Python2, or uses Python2
in the autopkg tests.  Please stop using Python2, and fix this issue
by one of the following actions.

- Convert your Package to Python3. This is the preferred option.  In
  case you are providing a Python module foo, please consider dropping
  the python-foo package, and only build a python3-foo package.  Please
  don't drop Python2 modules, which still have reverse dependencies,
  just document them.
  
  This is the preferred option.

- If the package is dead upstream, cannot be converted or maintained
  in Debian, it should be removed from the distribution.  If the
  package still has reverse dependencies, raise the severity to
  "serious" and document the reverse dependencies with the BTS affects
  command.  If the package has no reverse dependencies, confirm that
  the package can be removed, reassign this issue to ftp.debian.org,
  make sure that the bug priority is set to normal and retitle the
  issue to "RM: PKG -- removal triggered by the Python2 removal".

- If the package has still many users (popcon >= 300), or is needed to
  build another package which cannot be removed, document that by
  adding the "py2keep" user tag (not replacing the py2remove tag),
  using the debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org user.  Also any
  dependencies on an unversioned python package (python, python-dev)
  must not be used, same with the python shebang.  These have to be
  replaced by python2/python2.7 dependencies and shebang.

  This is the least preferred option.

If the conversion or removal needs action on another package first,
please document the blocking by using the BTS affects command, like

  affects  + src:eficas

If there is no py2removal bug for that reverse-dependency, please file
a bug on this package (similar to this bug report).

If there are questions, please refer to the wiki page for the removal:
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal, or ask for help on IRC
#debian-python, or the debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org mailing list.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6.4.0-1-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package eficas has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941288

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

pandas 0.23.3+dfsg-7 MIGRATED to testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the pandas source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 0.23.3+dfsg-4
  Current version:  0.23.3+dfsg-7

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#941285: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

   qtiplot | 0.9.8.9-18 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, 
mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
qtiplot-doc | 0.9.8.9-18 | all

--- Reason ---
RoQA; Depends on Qt4, upstream went closed-source
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 941...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/941285

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#941288: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

eficas |  6.4.0-1-2 | source, all

--- Reason ---
RoQA; Depends on Qt4
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 941...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/941288

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#941285: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 0.9.8.9-18+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package qtiplot has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941285

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#941286: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

libqtexengine-dev |   0.3-3+b2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, 
mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libqtexengine1 |   0.3-3+b2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, 
mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
qtexengine |  0.3-3 | source

--- Reason ---
RoQA; dead upstream, depends on qt4
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 941...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/941286

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#941286: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 0.3-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package qtexengine has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941286

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers