Typo in Changelog (was: Re: Accepted freeimage 3.17.0+ds1-3 (source) into unstable)
Hi, On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 07:20:47PM +, Ghislain Antony Vaillant wrote: >[ Ghislain Antony Vaillant ] >* Fix CVE-2016-5864: apply patch from wheezy-security. > Thanks to Salvatore Bonaccorso, Balint Reczey and Chris Lamb > (Closes: #839827) There is a typo in the CVE ID. Can you please fix that in the packaging repo so that it will be fixed in a future upload? CVE-2016-5684. Thanks for your work, Regards, Salvatore -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Processed: Re: [Debian-science-sagemath] Bug#840481: singular-ui: segfault when piping to stdin
Processing control commands: > tags -1 upstream Bug #840481 [singular-ui] singular-ui: segfault when piping to stdin Added tag(s) upstream. > forwarded -1 https://www.singular.uni-kl.de:8005/trac/ticket/775 Bug #840481 [singular-ui] singular-ui: segfault when piping to stdin Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://www.singular.uni-kl.de:8005/trac/ticket/775'. -- 840481: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840481 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#840481: [Debian-science-sagemath] Bug#840481: singular-ui: segfault when piping to stdin
Control: tags -1 upstream Control: forwarded -1 https://www.singular.uni-kl.de:8005/trac/ticket/775 Ximin Luo: > Package: singular-ui > Version: 4.0.3-p3+ds-1 > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > Some extra Sagemath test cases are failing since we upgraded to Singular 4; > minimal test case: > > $ echo '12345*54321;' | Singular > [ fails spectacularly ] > > but it works if you run `Singular` and type it in manually. Presumably the > pipe > version also worked with Singular 3 before. > Workaround is to call `Singular -b` instead of `Singular`; I will prepare a patch for Sage shortly. X -- GPG: ed25519/56034877E1F87C35 GPG: rsa4096/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE https://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#840481: singular-ui: segfault when piping to stdin
Package: singular-ui Version: 4.0.3-p3+ds-1 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Some extra Sagemath test cases are failing since we upgraded to Singular 4; minimal test case: $ echo '12345*54321;' | Singular [ fails spectacularly ] but it works if you run `Singular` and type it in manually. Presumably the pipe version also worked with Singular 3 before. X -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (300, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages singular-ui depends on: ii libc6 2.24-3 ii libflint-2.5.2 2.5.2-9 ii libgcc1 1:6.1.1-11 ii libgmp102:6.1.1+dfsg-1 ii libmpfr43.1.5-1 ii libntl279.9.1-3 ii libreadline77.0-1 ii libsingular44.0.3-p3+ds-1 ii libstdc++6 6.1.1-11 ii libtinfo5 6.0+20160917-1 ii singular-data 4.0.3-p3+ds-1 Versions of packages singular-ui recommends: ii singular-modules 4.0.3-p3+ds-1 Versions of packages singular-ui suggests: pn singular-doc -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 840454 https://github.com/linbox-team/fflas-ffpack/issues/45 Bug #840454 [src:fflas-ffpack] fflas-ffpack: FTBFS: several tests fail Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/linbox-team/fflas-ffpack/issues/45'. > forwarded 840455 https://github.com/linbox-team/fflas-ffpack/issues/45 Bug #840455 [src:fflas-ffpack] fflas-ffpack: FTBFS on sparc64: test-pluq-check uncaught FailureTrsmCheck Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/linbox-team/fflas-ffpack/issues/45'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 840454: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840454 840455: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840455 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Processing of freeimage_3.17.0+ds1-3_source.changes
freeimage_3.17.0+ds1-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: freeimage_3.17.0+ds1-3.dsc freeimage_3.17.0+ds1-3.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#840461: openfoam: FTBFS (32-bit): ambiguous overload for 'operator<<'
Hi Aaron, thanks for the notice and the tip! OpenFOAM has just entered an archive and I will try to fix FTBFSs on 32-bit platforms. Regards Anton 2016-10-11 20:25 GMT+02:00 Aaron M. Ucko: > db/dictionary/functionEntries/codeStream/codeStream.C:200:44: error: > ambiguous overload for 'operator<<' (operand types are 'Foam::Ostream' and > 'off_t {aka long int}') > > The problem is that, on these architectures, off_t is formally long > whereas int32_t (for which an operator<< variant exists) is formally > int; although the types are de facto equivalent on these > architectures, C++ insists on treating them as distinct. > > I would suggest adding explicit long and unsigned long variants on > these architectures (but not 64-bit architectures, on which they'll > duplicate the existing [u]int64_t variants.) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#840462: openfoam: FTBFS on m68k: mpi.h: No such file or directory
Source: openfoam Version: 4.0+dfsg1-3 Severity: important Justification: fails to build from source The m68k build of openfoam failed: PstreamGlobals.H:41:17: fatal error: mpi.h: No such file or directory #include The issue appears to be that debian/rules assumes that mpi-defaults-dev yields OpenMPI; although that's thankfully valid for all release architectures nowadays, the non-release architectures m68k and sh4 both still use MPICH. Could you please take a look? Thanks! -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#840461: openfoam: FTBFS (32-bit): ambiguous overload for 'operator<<'
Source: openfoam Version: 4.0+dfsg1-3 Severity: important Justification: fails to build from source Builds of openfoam for 32-bit architectures have been failing: db/dictionary/functionEntries/codeStream/codeStream.C: In static member function 'static void (* Foam::functionEntries::codeStream::getFunction(const Foam::dictionary&, const Foam::dictionary&))(Foam::Ostream&, const Foam::dictionary&)': db/dictionary/functionEntries/codeStream/codeStream.C:200:44: error: ambiguous overload for 'operator<<' (operand types are 'Foam::Ostream' and 'off_t {aka long int}') The problem is that, on these architectures, off_t is formally long whereas int32_t (for which an operator<< variant exists) is formally int; although the types are de facto equivalent on these architectures, C++ insists on treating them as distinct. I would suggest adding explicit long and unsigned long variants on these architectures (but not 64-bit architectures, on which they'll duplicate the existing [u]int64_t variants.) Could you please take a look? Thanks! -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#840458: linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra, charpoly}
Source: linbox Version: 1.4.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) The i386 build of linbox failed: ../build-aux/test-driver: line 107: 16085 Illegal instruction "$@" > $log_file 2>&1 FAIL: test-cra [...] ../build-aux/test-driver: line 107: 16135 Illegal instruction "$@" > $log_file 2>&1 FAIL: test-charpoly Could you please take a look? Thanks! -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#840457: linbox: FTBFS w/fflas-ffpack 1.x: No package 'fflas-ffpack' found
Source: linbox Version: 1.4.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Builds of linbox on architectures that still have fflas-ffpack 1.6.0-1 due to #840454 have been failing: checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for FFLAS_FFPACK... no configure: error: Package requirements (fflas-ffpack) were not met: No package 'fflas-ffpack' found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Please version the build dependency on fflas-ffpack to ensure you get a version that ships fflas-ffpack.pc. (Alternatively, if the 1.6.0 API is sufficient for your purposes, you could explicitly set FFLAS_FFPACK_{CFLAGS,LIBS}.) Thanks! -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#840455: fflas-ffpack: FTBFS on sparc64: test-pluq-check uncaught FailureTrsmCheck
Source: fflas-ffpack Version: 2.2.2-2 Severity: important Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) The latest fflas-ffpack build for the non-release architecture sparc64 encountered one architecture-specific error in addition to the multi-architecture Modular errors I just reported as #840454: FAIL: test-pluq-check = terminate called after throwing an instance of 'FailureTrsmCheck' FAIL test-pluq-check (exit status: 134) Could you please take a look? Thanks! -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#833023: marked as done (linbox: B-D on libgivaro-dev (<< 3.8.0), but sid has 4.0.1-3)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:00:01 +0100 with message-id <6e114640-7ae8-5f91-1ebd-631e9d881...@debian.org> and subject line Fixed in version 1.4.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #833023, regarding linbox: B-D on libgivaro-dev (<< 3.8.0), but sid has 4.0.1-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 833023: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833023 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Source: linbox Version: 1.3.2-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) linbox Build-Depends on an obsolete version of libgivaro-dev which is no longer availabe in sid. Andreas --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Control: fixed -1 1.4.2-1 This was fixed in version 1.4.2-1.--- End Message --- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#811990: marked as done (linbox: FTBFS with GCC 6: call overloaded is ambiguous)
Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 08:34:23 +0100 with message-id <6272ba5f-6717-9201-0219-6f8250d02...@debian.org> and subject line Fixed in version 1.4.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #811990, regarding linbox: FTBFS with GCC 6: call overloaded is ambiguous to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 811990: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811990 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: linbox Version: 1.3.2-1.1 Severity: important User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-6 gcc-6-overloaded-ambiguous This package fails to build with GCC 6. GCC 6 has not been released yet, but it's expected that GCC 6 will become the default compiler for stretch. Note that only the first error is reported; there might be more. You can find a snapshot of GCC 6 in experimental. To build with GCC 6, you can set CC=gcc-6 CXX=g++-6 explicitly. You may be able to find out more about this issue at https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/changes.html > sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.67.0 (26 Dec 2015) on dl580gen9-02.hlinux ... > /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. > -I../.. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2-g -DNDEBUG -U_LB_DEBUG > -DDISABLE_COMMENTATOR -I/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu > -I/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat > -Werror=format-security -c -o diophantine-solver.lo diophantine-solver.C > libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -Wdate-time > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2 -g -DNDEBUG -U_LB_DEBUG -DDISABLE_COMMENTATOR > -I/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu -I/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu -g -O2 > -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -c > diophantine-solver.C -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/diophantine-solver.o > In file included from ../../linbox/vector/vector-domain-gf2.h:59:0, > from ../../linbox/vector/vector-domain.h:1293, > from ../../linbox/matrix/matrix-domain.h:42, > from ../../linbox/matrix/sparse.h:75, > from ../../linbox/blackbox/sparse.h:57, > from ../../linbox/blackbox/lambda-sparse.h:29, > from ../../linbox/algorithms/rational-solver.h:43, > from ../../linbox/algorithms/diophantine-solver.h:29, > from diophantine-solver.C:25: > ../../linbox/field/gf2.h: In function 'void std::swap(std::_Bit_reference, > std::_Bit_reference)': > ../../linbox/field/gf2.h:985:14: error: redefinition of 'void > std::swap(std::_Bit_reference, std::_Bit_reference)' > inline void swap(stdBitReference __x, stdBitReference __y) > ^~~~ > > In file included from /usr/include/c++/6/vector:65:0, > from ../../linbox/util/debug.h:42, > from ../../linbox/algorithms/rational-solver.h:38, > from ../../linbox/algorithms/diophantine-solver.h:29, > from diophantine-solver.C:25: > /usr/include/c++/6/bits/stl_bvector.h:112:3: note: 'void > std::swap(std::_Bit_reference, std::_Bit_reference)' previously defined here >swap(_Bit_reference __x, _Bit_reference __y) noexcept >^~~~ > > In file included from ../../linbox/matrix/blas-matrix.h:1196:0, > from ../../linbox/blackbox/compose.h:34, > from ../../linbox/algorithms/rational-solver.h:44, > from ../../linbox/algorithms/diophantine-solver.h:29, > from diophantine-solver.C:25: > ../../linbox/matrix/blas-matrix.inl: In member function 'void > LinBox::BlasMatrix<_Field>::transpose()': > ../../linbox/matrix/blas-matrix.inl:866:24: error: call of overloaded > 'swap(size_t&, size_t&)' is ambiguous > std::swap(_row,_col); > ^ --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Control: fixed -1 1.4.2-1 This was fixed in version 1.4.2-1.--- End Message --- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Hello
Hello My name is Gloria Pelaez from Australian am Living in Manila. l am 29 years old. l really need your assistance. My husband died two years ago and the family members want to kill me and my children and seat on the inheritance he left for us with bank here in Philippines, l am now in a hiding place with my kids and the documents of inheritance is with us. Please help us to have this fund transferred to your country and we will fly to join you. l will be waiting for your reply Gloria Pelaez -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Processing of gli_0.8.1.1+ds1-2_amd64.changes
gli_0.8.1.1+ds1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gli_0.8.1.1+ds1-2.dsc gli_0.8.1.1+ds1-2.debian.tar.xz libgli-dev_0.8.1.1+ds1-2_all.deb libgli-doc_0.8.1.1+ds1-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers