Bug#853029: mpi-default-dev: update mpi defaults for m68k and sh4 to openmpi?

[Drew Parsons]

Package: mpi-default-dev
Version: 1.8
Severity: normal

This bug report follows on from #833425
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833425

openmpi now builds on m68k and sh4.

For various reasons it could be convenient if the Debian default
mpi on these architectures could be updated from mpich to openmpi.

The specific reason that bothers me is that mpich does not provide
mpi-fort.pc, while openmpi does.  This prevents mumps from building on
m68k and sh4 (with blacs-mpi also affected). 

Cheers,
Drew


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages mpi-default-dev depends on:
ii  libopenmpi-dev  2.0.2~git.20161225-9

mpi-default-dev recommends no packages.

mpi-default-dev suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#852995: givaro: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)

[Doug Torrance]

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/linbox-team/givaro/issues/38

On 01/28/2017 01:49 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:

I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
but it failed:


[...]
  debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --with autoreconf
dh_testdir -i
dh_update_autotools_config -i
dh_autoreconf -i
libtoolize: putting auxiliary files in AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR, 'build-aux'.
libtoolize: copying file 'build-aux/ltmain.sh'
libtoolize: putting macros in AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIRS, 'macros'.
libtoolize: copying file 'macros/libtool.m4'
libtoolize: copying file 'macros/ltoptions.m4'
libtoolize: copying file 'macros/ltsugar.m4'
libtoolize: copying file 'macros/ltversion.m4'
libtoolize: copying file 'macros/lt~obsolete.m4'
configure.ac:149: installing 'build-aux/compile'

[... snipped ...]

ERROR a4 != a6
ERROR a7 != a8
ERROR a9 != a10
ERROR a1 != a3
ERROR a4 != a7
ERROR a2 != a5
ERROR a1 != a9
FAIL test-crt (exit status: 1)


Thanks for your report!  This issue is apparently known already to 
upstream -- see the GitHub issue above.


--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#852995: givaro: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> forwarded -1 https://github.com/linbox-team/givaro/issues/38
Bug #852995 [src:givaro] givaro: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://github.com/linbox-team/givaro/issues/38'.

-- 
852995: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852995
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

ompl_1.2.1+ds1-1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Debian FTP Masters]

binary:libompl12 is NEW.
binary:libompl12 is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
 or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processing of ompl_1.2.1+ds1-1_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

ompl_1.2.1+ds1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ompl_1.2.1+ds1-1.dsc
  ompl_1.2.1+ds1.orig.tar.gz
  ompl_1.2.1+ds1-1.debian.tar.xz
  libompl-dev_1.2.1+ds1-1_amd64.deb
  libompl12-dbgsym_1.2.1+ds1-1_amd64.deb
  libompl12_1.2.1+ds1-1_amd64.deb
  ompl-demos_1.2.1+ds1-1_all.deb
  ompl_1.2.1+ds1-1_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: r-cran-zelig_5.0-13-1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Andreas Tille]

Hi ftpmasters,

it seemed this mail slipped through.  You kindly accepted r-cran-zelig
but r-cran-survey and r-cran-aer remain in new queue.  It would be nice
if you could consider the latter two soon to not let r-cran-zelig
uninstallable in unstable and keeping QA-people busy filing bug reports
about this.

Kind regards

   Andreas.

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:49:26AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi ftpmasters,
> 
> just a note for this package:  Despite this package is not new and you
> might consider fastprocessing please note that it needs two
> (Build-)Depends that are currently in the new queue (r-cran-survey and
> r-cran-aer).
> 
> The package somehow escaped my general overhaul of all R packages -
> possibly since it was not (yet) team maintained and the source package
> name did not followed the r-cran-* naming scheme.  Both is fixed now.
> 
> I confirm that I understand that its to late for the next stable release
> I just want to make sure that the dependencies will be accepted before
> this package.
> 
> Happy new year to all ftpmasters and thanks for your work
> 
>   Andreas.
> 
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 09:34:04AM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> > source:r-cran-zelig is NEW.
> > 
> > Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
> > from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
> > OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
> > 
> > Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
> > free to browse the NEW queue[1].
> > 
> > If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
> > member of the ftpteam.
> > 
> > If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.
> > 
> > [1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> >  or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports
> > 
> > -- 
> > debian-science-maintainers mailing list
> > debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
> > 
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de
> 
> -- 
> debian-science-maintainers mailing list
> debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
> 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#852995: givaro: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)

[Santiago Vila]

Package: src:givaro
Version: 4.0.2-5
Severity: important

Dear maintainer:

I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
but it failed:


[...]
 debian/rules build-indep
dh build-indep --with autoreconf 
   dh_testdir -i
   dh_update_autotools_config -i
   dh_autoreconf -i
libtoolize: putting auxiliary files in AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR, 'build-aux'.
libtoolize: copying file 'build-aux/ltmain.sh'
libtoolize: putting macros in AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIRS, 'macros'.
libtoolize: copying file 'macros/libtool.m4'
libtoolize: copying file 'macros/ltoptions.m4'
libtoolize: copying file 'macros/ltsugar.m4'
libtoolize: copying file 'macros/ltversion.m4'
libtoolize: copying file 'macros/lt~obsolete.m4'
configure.ac:149: installing 'build-aux/compile'

[... snipped ...]

ERROR a4 != a6
ERROR a7 != a8
ERROR a9 != a10
ERROR a1 != a3
ERROR a4 != a7
ERROR a2 != a5
ERROR a1 != a9
FAIL test-crt (exit status: 1)


Testsuite summary for Givaro 4.0.2

# TOTAL: 62
# PASS:  61
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  1
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0

See tests/test-suite.log
Please report to jean-guillaume.du...@imag.fr

Makefile:1904: recipe for target 'test-suite.log' failed
make[6]: *** [test-suite.log] Error 1
make[6]: Leaving directory '/<>/tests'
Makefile:2010: recipe for target 'check-TESTS' failed
make[5]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 2
make[5]: Leaving directory '/<>/tests'
Makefile:2535: recipe for target 'check-am' failed
make[4]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[4]: Leaving directory '/<>/tests'
Makefile:1797: recipe for target 'check-recursive' failed
make[3]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory '/<>/tests'
Makefile:579: recipe for target 'check-recursive' failed
make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/<>'
dh_auto_test: make -j1 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2
debian/rules:41: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_test' failed
make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
debian/rules:52: recipe for target 'build-indep' failed
make: *** [build-indep] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-indep gave error exit status 2


This is just how the build ends, not necessarily the relevant part.

I've put several build logs here:

https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/givaro/

If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use reassign and 
affects,
so that this is still visible in the page for this package.

The bug should be reproducible with sbuild on a single CPU virtual machine,
provided you try enough times (as the failure happens randomly).

(Note: Failure rate is very low, around 1%, it might be more interesting to skip
trying to reproduce it and instead look at the build logs and try to guess how
it may happen).

Thanks.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Otkriće Teslinih torzionih polja na Bosanskim piramidama

[Piramida Sunca]

Bosanske piramide NEWSLETTER 

















 


Kosmički internet

OTKRIĆE TESLINIH TORZIONIH POLJA NA BOSANSKIM PIRAMIDAMA

Piše: dr. Semir Osmanagić

Abstrakt: Snimljeni energetski fenomeni iznad Bosanske piramide Sunca traže drugačiju definiciju piramida u odnosu na konvencionalna, dogmatska objašnjenja. Piramide su energetski pojačivači koji su slali i primali informacije preko Sunca. Otkriće Teslinih stojećih valova iznad vrha Bosanske piramide Sunca, koji se kreću brzinama većim od brzine svjetlosti, pri čemu ne gube snagu pri prolasku kroz kosmička tijela, omogućavaju koncept postojanja kosmičkog interneta i gotovo trenutnu
intergalaktičku komunikaciju u Univerzumu.

***

Prije petnaest godina sam pisao o o ulozi Maja kao “kosmičkih urara” u svojim knjigama i civilizaciji čiji je cilj bio usklađivanje frekvencija naše Planete sa Suncem, Tu moju, u to vrijeme hipotezu, urednici Wikipedije su iskoristili kao “argument za diskreditaciju”.  Moja istraživanja i argumenti da su piramide građene širom svijeta, a da su najstarije piramide ujedno i superiorne, dovelo je d situacije da egiptolozi stvore zid odbojnosti prema meni. Moje tvrdnje da je Bosanska piramida Sunca najstarija piramida na svijetu izazvala je reakciju najuticajnijeg egiptologa na svijetu Zahi Hawasa da nam dugi niz godina onemogući pristup vodećim svjetskim naučnim TV kanalima.  Naši dokazi o najstarijem i najkvalitetnijem betonu na svijetu, pronađenom na Bosanskoj piramidi Sunca, te postojanju najveće mreže prahistorijskih tunela izazvali su pisanje peticija Europske arheološke asocijacije protiv
našeg istraživanja.

Naravno, vrijeme i naučni argumenti potvrđuju da smo mi bili u pravu, a oni u krivu.

Dakle, već se piše nova historija, ne samo Europe, već i čitavog svijeta.

No, nisu samo knjige historije pogrešne u našem obrazovnom sistemu. Pogrešno nas uče, ili bolje reći, programiraju, u svim temeljnim oblastima znanja.

Fizičari, astronomi i geolozi… ustrajavaju da je kosmos nastao Teorijom velikog praska iz ništavila i da se danas ubrzano širi. Biolozi i dalje podržavaju darvinizam i teže da je život nastao iz neorganske materije, da evolucija uzrokuje razvoj živih vrsta i da je čovjek nastao od majmuna. U krivu su. Život je nastao intervencijom na našoj Planeti, vrste se mijenjaju u dugom periodu kroz eksperimente gdje evolucija igra minornu ulogu, a homo sapiens je plod genetskog inžinjeringa. I, naravno, mi nismo niti prva niti najrazvijenija civilizacija u historiji Planete.

Filozofija, fizika, matematika
i inžinjerska znanja mogu objasniti kosmos, nastanak naše Planete, i života na zemlji. Ali, uz konvencionalna znanja potrebno je da se deprogramiraju i otvore prema duhovnim znanjima i sakralnoj geometriji, kako bi shvatili energetsku bit svog živog i neživog svijeta

***

Postavimo se u ulogu Kreatora kosmosa. Iz centra Univerzuma započinjemo stvaranje velikog broja galaksija. U ovom momentu pretpostavka je da u našem kosmosu postoji oko 400 milijardi galaksija. Procjene o broju galaksija se inače stalno povećavaju u proteklih nekoliko decenija.

Svaka galaksija ima veliki broj zvjezdanih sistema. Primjera radi, naša galaksija Mliječni put je do prije desetak godina imala procjenu na 100 milijardi zvijezda, sada se pak govori o 400 milijardi zvijezda. Među tih 400 milijardi nalazi se i naše Sunce.

Svaka zvijezda ima nekoliko planeta. Mi smo primjera radi, treća planeta u Sunčevom sistemu. Nadalje, planete vrlo često imaju svoje mjesece,
nekada jedan ,nekada nekoliko desetina, itd.

Vratimo se ulozi Kreatora. Ako smo stvorili ovako ogroman i složen sistem, s gotovo beskonačno mnogo kosmičkih objekata, kako  njima upravljati, kako pratiti stanje “zdravlja” na svim objektima, kako uspostaviti efikasan komunikacijski sistem?

Ajnštajnova fizika nas uči da je najveća brzina u svemiru, brzina svjetlosti. Gotovo 300.000 km u sekundi je sasvim dovoljna za naše zemaljske pojmove. Ali, svjetlosti od Zemlje do našeg Sunca treba gotovo osam minuta putovanja. To je već dosta sporo. Do nekoliko najbližih zvijezda svjetlosti treba desetak godina. Do udaljenijih zvijezda u našoj galaksiji, svjetlosti treba nekoliko stotina ili čak nekoliko hiljada godina. Putovanje do mnogih drugih galaksija traje znatno duže.

Kreatoru bi brzina svjetlosti bila vrlo nepraktična i prespora ako želi trenutnu komunikaciju sa svim kosmičkim “podanicima”.

Postoji li brzina veća od brzine
svjetlosti? Prema Ajnštajnu, ni jedan object sa realnom masom irovanja ne može dostići brzinu svjetlosti. Međutim, čitavom novom valu nezavisnih istraživača, ograničenja brzine svjetlosti nisu prepreka za postojanje još većih brzina.  Za njemačkog fizičara prof.dr. Konstantina Meyla to su čestice neutrina, koji putuju većom brzinom. O tome nam je govorio 2014. u Visokom.

Za niz drugih istraživača, među kojima je najprominentniji Nikola Tesla, skalarni valovi, ili stojeći valovi, nastali interakcijom torzionih polja koja imaju daleko veću brzinu od brzine 

ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 17:13:02 +0100
Source: ros-catkin-pkg
Binary: python-catkin-pkg
Architecture: source
Version: 0.2.10-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers 

Changed-By: Jochen Sprickerhof 
Description:
 python-catkin-pkg - Low-level build system macros for Robot OS -- Python module
Changes:
 ros-catkin-pkg (0.2.10-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Add patch for catkin_create_pkg
Checksums-Sha1:
 73862ab5001fa1cee8f5fd16f97ad2938991568a 2259 ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5.dsc
 edb127cd8f0953e4779c6f77ab552ece0cd6e16c 4296 
ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5.debian.tar.xz
 56bbac229b9886d5d41b1ddecbbefe36a43ea755 5797 
ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 56c04c1389857d89f6f3ecf0d95b569da0bd3741df3388e5f44fb90ff67f6e7a 2259 
ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5.dsc
 169e82e4e3ff0fa88e050d1f6f4501bf79b21e5cc831a382c9e8157f38d0 4296 
ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5.debian.tar.xz
 784fa8cda5d096d65620e811eeaa0da0315f4777aa289a0fe34a5361b3e0a2e3 5797 
ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5_source.buildinfo
Files:
 36f7a7806f2917891c9387dd15043273 2259 python optional 
ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5.dsc
 4aa91c942c6d9a639dbe40d0f2d7e575 4296 python optional 
ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5.debian.tar.xz
 a768b725964018ba7e1a296661dee3af 5797 python optional 
ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5_source.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=IcUq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processing of ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5.dsc
  ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5.debian.tar.xz
  ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

sdformat 4.2.0-1 MIGRATED to testing

[Debian testing watch]

FYI: The status of the sdformat source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 4.1.1-1
  Current version:  4.2.0-1

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See https://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5_source.changes REJECTED

[Debian FTP Masters]

ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5.dsc: Invalid size hash for 
ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10.orig.tar.gz:
According to the control file the size hash should be 44289,
but ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10.orig.tar.gz has 43715.

If you did not include ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10.orig.tar.gz in your upload, a 
different version
might already be known to the archive software.



===

Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.


-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processing of ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5.dsc
  ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5.debian.tar.xz
  ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-5_source.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processed: Add ITPs as blockers

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 852925 by 850622 805257
Bug #852925 [src:r-cran-zelig] r-cran-zelig: FTBFS: unsatisfiable 
build-dependencies: r-cran-survey, r-cran-aer
852925 was not blocked by any bugs.
852925 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 852925: 850622 and 805257
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
852925: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852925
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#845972: A fix for the bug

[Anton Gladky]

Hi,

thanks for you fix! If we apply this patch, all dependent
packages should be checked, whether they do not fail.
It will definitely not happen before the release.

Best regards

Anton


2017-01-26 11:55 GMT+01:00  <1...@gmx.us>:
> Hi,
>
> The only thing that has to be done to fix this bug is add the tag,
> -DVTK_CUSTOM_LIBRARY_SUFFIX:STRING="", when configuring using cmake.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> debian-science-maintainers mailing list
> debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#852906: numexpr: FTBFS: Test failures

[Antonio Valentino]

Hi,
the RC bug #852906 has been fixed and a new version of the debian
package for numexpr (2.6.1-4) is now available [1,2].

Can anyone please upload it?


[1] git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/numexpr.git
[2]
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/numexpr/numexpr_2.6.1-4.dsc

-- 
Antonio Valentino

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processed: Tagging #852906 as pending

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 852906 + pending
Bug #852906 [src:numexpr] numexpr: FTBFS: Test failures
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
852906: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852906
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#852925: r-cran-zelig: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: r-cran-survey, r-cran-aer

[Lucas Nussbaum]

Source: r-cran-zelig
Version: 5.0-13-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170128 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> +--+
> | Install package build dependencies  
>  |
> +--+
> 
> 
> Setup apt archive
> -
> 
> Merged Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), dh-r, r-base-dev (>= 3.0), 
> r-cran-sandwich, r-cran-mass, r-cran-survival, r-cran-vgam, r-cran-jsonlite, 
> r-cran-plyr, r-cran-dplyr, r-cran-quantreg, r-cran-geepack, r-cran-mcmcpack, 
> r-cran-coda, r-cran-amelia, r-cran-matchit, r-cran-maxlik, r-cran-survey, 
> r-cran-aer
> Filtered Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10), dh-r, r-base-dev (>= 3.0), 
> r-cran-sandwich, r-cran-mass, r-cran-survival, r-cran-vgam, r-cran-jsonlite, 
> r-cran-plyr, r-cran-dplyr, r-cran-quantreg, r-cran-geepack, r-cran-mcmcpack, 
> r-cran-coda, r-cran-amelia, r-cran-matchit, r-cran-maxlik, r-cran-survey, 
> r-cran-aer
> dpkg-deb: building package 'sbuild-build-depends-r-cran-zelig-dummy' in 
> '/<>/resolver-Ym1Ft4/apt_archive/sbuild-build-depends-r-cran-zelig-dummy.deb'.
> dpkg-scanpackages: warning: Packages in archive but missing from override 
> file:
> dpkg-scanpackages: warning:   sbuild-build-depends-core-dummy 
> sbuild-build-depends-r-cran-zelig-dummy
> dpkg-scanpackages: info: Wrote 2 entries to output Packages file.
> Ign:1 copy:/<>/resolver-Ym1Ft4/apt_archive ./ InRelease
> Get:2 copy:/<>/resolver-Ym1Ft4/apt_archive ./ Release [963 B]
> Ign:3 copy:/<>/resolver-Ym1Ft4/apt_archive ./ Release.gpg
> Get:4 copy:/<>/resolver-Ym1Ft4/apt_archive ./ Sources [599 B]
> Get:5 copy:/<>/resolver-Ym1Ft4/apt_archive ./ Packages [677 B]
> Fetched 2239 B in 0s (216 kB/s)
> Reading package lists...
> W: No sandbox user '_apt' on the system, can not drop privileges
> Reading package lists...
> 
> Install r-cran-zelig build dependencies (apt-based resolver)
> 
> 
> Installing build dependencies
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Reading state information...
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  sbuild-build-depends-r-cran-zelig-dummy : Depends: r-cran-survey but it is 
> not installable
>Depends: r-cran-aer but it is not 
> installable
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> apt-get failed.

The full build log is available from:
   http://aws-logs.debian.net/2017/01/28/r-cran-zelig_5.0-13-1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#852906: numexpr: FTBFS: Test failures

[Lucas Nussbaum]

Source: numexpr
Version: 2.6.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170128 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part (hopefully):
> 
> ==
> FAIL: test_scalar2_long_none_POW_TESTS_4066 (__main__.TestExpressions)
> --
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "numexpr/tests/test_numexpr.py", line 1032, in method
> return func()
>   File "numexpr/tests/test_numexpr.py", line 605, in method
> assert np_exception is None, msg
> AssertionError: expected numexpr error not raised for expression '(a+1)**-7'
> 
> --
> Ran 5441 tests in 5.671s
> 
> FAILED (failures=24)
> debian/rules:59: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_test' failed

The full build log is available from:
   http://aws-logs.debian.net/2017/01/28/numexpr_2.6.1-3_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers